Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jacobs,
Jane.
The
death
and
life
of
great
American
cities,
Vintage
books
edition,
1992,
(origin
version
1961),
New
York
different
scales
in
the
city.
My
role
is
not
to
author
the
total
design
of
final
outcome,
but
rather
direct,
facilitate
and
respond
to
changing
inspirations
and
opportunities
in
the
project
throughout
the
process.
Project
Premise:
Multi-Scaled
Propositions,
Moments
in
the
City
The
focus
of
the
project
is
to
conceive
a
new
adaptation
to
the
city
through
the
collective
imagination.
I
can
begin
by
introducing
architectural
moments
into
the
city
that
are
framed
within
their
context.
These
moments
will
materialize
in
the
form
of
collages;
photographic
in
the
way
they
capture
instances
of
new
imagined
impressions
of
the
city.
Collages
of
city
scenes
will
aim
to
inspire
new
opportunities
within
the
city,
reconstructing
the
street
to
consider
potentials
and
points
of
departure.
Collages
can
be
constructed
by
combining
contemporary
images
of
Toronto
with
its
historical
imagery,
images
from
other
cities
and
new
ideas
(propositions)
for
architecture,
public
space,
and
transportation.
The
collages
can
act
as
the
primary
point
of
departure,
first
to
deconstruct
the
street
as
means
to
reinterpret
the
city,
and
understand
it
from
the
point
of
view
of
a
pedestrian.
These
insertions
will
be
situated
through
media
that
enable
an
interactive
discourse
to
take
shape,
for
instance,
a
blog.
The
gathering
and
amalgamation
of
a
diverse
variety
of
opinion
in
the
methodology
will
influence
and
negotiate
the
basis
and
benefit
of
any
specific
insertion.
In
this
way,
feedback
I
receive
from
the
blog,
will
inspire
further
advances
into
the
project.
What
is
the
role
of
Toronto
as
a
model
for
new
imagination?
From
an
architectural
scale
to
an
urban-scaled
project,
there
is
much
to
learn
from
Toronto
and
other
Canadian
cities.
Torontos
urban
landscape
-
the
vastness
of
its
sprawl,
the
disability
of
its
uneconomical
transportation
system,
the
unchanged
scars
of
post-war
development
have
made
it
a
significant
target
of
criticism
and
simultaneously,
an
extraordinary
prospect
of
potentiality
for
hopeful
and
passionate
citizens.
The
site
chosen
in
Toronto
will
be
situated
around
historical
and
current
controversial
urban
issues,
with
program(s)
that
appeal
to
the
desires
and
fundamental
needs
of
surrounding
communities
and
the
greater
region
of
Toronto.
The
programs
will
become
concrete
following
the
process
of
insertion
and
feedback,
encompassing
a
reflection
of
the
collective
contemporary
desires
for
the
city,
and
embodying
multiple
scales.
These
scales
will
respond
to
individual
space,
public
space
and
the
interaction
of
various
spaces
through
a
consideration
of
circulation
and
its
shared
affects
on
the
site
and
city
(ie.
the
dwelling,
the
street
as
public
space,
circulation
modeling).
Bentley, I. (1999). Urban transformations: power, people, and urban design. London: Routledge (pp. 239-273).
range
of
surfaces.3
This
type
of
discussion
empathizes
with
the
notion
of
many
individuals
acting
across
a
landscape
each
with
their
own
individual
motives
balanced
by
the
range
of
opportunity
that
the
urban
landscape
can
provide.
These
perspectives
reveal
that
no
single
opinion
can
resolve
society,
nor
design
an
environment
that
is
meaningful
to
everyone
all
the
time.
History
has
exposed
modernist
egoist
planning
strategies
and
architecture
have
led
to
desolate
spaces,
and
monotonous
neighbourhoods,
void
of
interaction
nor
ecologically
sensitive.
Corner
regards
the
failings
of
twentieth
century
planning
as
the
absolute
impoverishment
of
the
imagination
with
regard
to
the
optimized
rationalization
of
development
practices
and
capital
accumulation.4
However,
he
does
not
fall
short
of
conveying
a
deep
sense
of
hope
in
the
possibility
of
design,
specifically
what
he
refers
to
as
landscape
urbanism.
He
regards
the
landscape
as
a
horizontal
surface
or
"field"
of
action.
These
surfaces
constitute
the
urban
field
when
considered
across
a
wide
range
of
scales,
from
the
sidewalk
to
the
street
to
the
entire
infrastructural
matrix
of
urban
surfaces.5
The
urban
scale
engages
not
only
the
physical
surfaces,
but
also
society
across
a
collection
of
scales,
which
are
relentlessly
in
flux.
There
are
numerous
amplitudes
at
which
we
engage
and
identify
with
society,
ranging
from
our
experience
of
intimate
space,
such
as
the
dwelling,
to
our
overall
perception
of
ourselves
as
citizens
or
belonging
to
a
place,
from
the
scale
of
the
neighbourhood
to
the
city.
These
are
the
scales
at
which
we
in
part
define
our
existence.
Our
sense
of
self
is
based
wholly
on
context
and
how
we
receive
the
contextual
impact
of
our
surroundings.
We
form
these
strange
bubbles
of
individual
existence;
which
embody
our
most
immediate
encounter
with
architecture
and
the
built
environment.
Physically
we
share
the
links
between
these
bubbles
as
we
move
from
place
to
place,
and
socially
we
share
these
links
Wall,
A.
(1999).
Programming
the
urban
surface.
In
J.
Corner
(Ed.),
Recovering
landscape
:
essays
in
contemporary
landscape
architecture
(pp.
233).
4
Corner,
J.
(2006).
Terra
fluxus.
In
C.
Waldheim
(Ed.),
The
landscape
urbanism
reader
(pp.
32).
5
Corner,
J.
(2006).
Terra
fluxus.
In
C.
Waldheim
(Ed.),
The
landscape
urbanism
reader
(pp.
30).
through
varying
discourses.
Discourse
enables
us
to
form
collective
perceptions
as
means
for
change
and
action.
In
the
case
of
this
project,
these
scales
can
be
examined
from
an
architectural
to
an
urban
scale
as
initial
moments
that
can
develop
through
discourse
into
a
concrete
proposition.
The
result
of
this
exploration
will
depend
greatly
on
the
feedback
received
throughout
the
process
of
investigation.
However,
it
will
encompass
an
architectural
project
that
illustrates
a
re-approach
first
to
the
private
space
of
the
individual
and
then
its
context
(made
up
of
many
individuals
and
their
environment),
in
which
the
architectural
artifact
does
not
operate
alone,
but
as
a
result
of
relationships
to
the
systems
that
support
it,
and
this
process
includes
forms
of
social
communication
(which
becomes
the
central
tool
for
the
process).
Solomon, Lawrence. 2007. Toronto sprawls: a history. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, (p.16).
and
the
project
I
propose
will
attempt
to
establish
moments
or
architectures
within
the
gaps
of
these
hot
spots.
I
would
like
to
look
at
Spadina
Avenue
as
a
point
of
significant
potential
for
a
site,
given
its
historical
and
social
context.
Spadina
was
saved
in
the
60s
by
a
citizen
based
opposition
group
who
rallied
against
the
proposal
to
create
the
Spadina
Expressway
which
would
grant
automobile
users
in
the
suburbs
convenient
access
to
the
city.
This
proposal
would
have
split
the
city,
cause
segregation
and
destroy
many
homes
and
local
businesses,
and
in
turn
devastate
local
culture.
The
deconstruction
of
Spadina
reveals
much
about
Toronto,
if
we
observe
and
analyze
various
parts
of
the
street
and
their
relationships
to
the
city.
Concentrating
on
the
downtown
portion
of
the
street,
Spadina
moves
from
the
controlled
historic
expression
of
U
of
T
buildings,
through
an
unkempt
area
of
local
businesses
into
the
bustling
china
town
area.
It
cuts
through
the
fashion
district
and
entering
a
strange
void
of
nearly
nothing
except
a
parking
lot
following
a
couple
of
gas
stations
towards
condos
that
seem
impermeable
at
grade
as
it
crosses
over
the
CN
rail
lines.
After
the
bridge
it
is
cut
by
the
Gardiner
Expressways
merging
lanes
and
overhead
highway,
and
ends
at
the
harbour.
There
is
a
notable
disconnect
from
the
vibrant
part
of
Spadina
to
that
of
the
harbour,
clearly
severed
by
the
Gardiner.
(Refer
to
Appendix
A.
Spadina).
Notably,
Spadina
has
been
characterized
as
a
street
of
action,
dominated
by
its
role
as
a
transportation
route,
early
on
becoming
a
main
tramway,
and
expanding
in
width
to
accommodate
more
vehicles.
What
is
the
implication
of
transportation
on
the
life
of
the
street
and
the
urban
matrix?
We
can
observe
Spadina
as
a
site
for
the
junction
of
many
actions
and
possibilities.
We
can
look
at
the
street
within
the
context
of
Christine
Boyers,
The
City
of
Collective
Memory,
whereby
she
engages
the
city
with
respect
to
layers
of
history
and
memory
that
create
a
matrix
of
differences
in
expression
and
opportunity.
She
states:
Different
layers
of
historical
time
superimposed
on
each
other
or
different
architectural
strata
(touching
but
not
necessarily
informing
each
other)
no
longer
generate
a
structural
city
but
merely
illuminate
an
experience
an
experience
of
diversity.7
Boyer
furthermore
observes
the
city
through
various
visual
models:
the
traditional
city,
the
city
as
a
work
of
art,
the
city
as
a
panorama,
and
the
city
as
a
spectacle.
All
of
these
models
tend
towards
notions
of
emergence
to
gain
grounds
and
reconcile
with
collective
imaginations.
Boyer
notions
of
the
city
reveal
opportunities
for
how
to
envision
the
artifact,
whereby
my
first
artifacts
will
act
to
collage
these
noted
collisions
in
possibilities
that
Spadina
presents.
Boyer,
M.
Christine.
1994.
The
city
of
collective
memory:
its
historical
imagery
and
architectural
entertainments.
Cambridge,
Mass:
MIT
Press
(p.19).
elaborate
on
my
method,
perhaps
gaining
the
skills
to
create
new
modes
of
feedback
generation.
The
methodology
will
likely
evolve
along
with
the
design
process.
10
List
of
Sources:
Beesley,
Philip,
Paola
Poletto,
and
Catherine
Molnar.
2008.Ourtopias:
cities
and
the
role
of
design.
[Cambridge,
Ont.]:
Riverside
Architectural
Press.
Bentley,
I.,
Alcock,
A.,
Murrain,
P.,
McGlynn,
S.,
&
Smith,
G.
(1985).
Responsive
environments.
London:
Architectural
Press.
Bentley,
I.
(1999).
Urban
transformations:
power,
people,
and
urban
design.
London:
Routledge.
Boyer,
M.
Christine.
1994.
The
city
of
collective
memory:
its
historical
imagery
and
architectural
entertainments.
Cambridge,
Mass:
MIT
Press.
Carmona,
M.,
&
Tiesdell,
S.
(Eds.).
(2007).
Urban
design
reader.
Oxford
and
Burlington
MA:
Architectural
Press.
Corner,
J.
(2006).
Terra
fluxus.
In
C.
Waldheim
(Ed.),
The
landscape
urbanism
reader.
Princeton
NJ:
Princeton
Architectural
Press.
Emergence.
RadioLab.
New
York
Public
Radio.
New
York,
NY:
WNYC,
July
15,
2008.
Fainstein,
S.
(1999).
Can
we
make
the
cities
we
want?
In
R.
A.
Beauregard
&
S.
Body-Gendrot
(Eds.),
The
urban
moment.
Thousand
Oaks
CA:
Sage
Harris,
Richard.
1996.
Unplanned
suburbs:
Toronto's
American
tragedy,
1900
to
1950.
Baltimore:
Johns
Hopkins
University
Press.
Hayden,
Dolores.
1995.
The
power
of
place:
urban
landscapes
as
public
history.
Cambridge,
Mass:
MIT
Press.
Hensel,
M.,
Menges,
A.,
and
Wienstock,
M.
(2004).
Emergence
in
Architecture.
Architectural
Design,
74(3),
6-9.
Jacobs,
J.
(1961).
The
death
and
life
of
great
American
cities.
New
York:
Vintage
Books.
Johnson,
Steven.
(2001).
Emergence:
the
connected
lives
of
ants,
brains,
cities,
and
software.
New
York:
Scribner.
Keith,
Michael,
and
Steve
Pile.
1993.
Place
and
the
politics
of
identity.
London:
Routledge.
Lynch,
K.
(1981).
Good
city
form.
Cambridge
MA:
MIT
Press.
Marshall,
R.
(2009).
The
elusiveness
of
urban
design:
the
perpetual
problem
of
definition
and
role.
In
A.
Krieger
&
W.
S.
Saunders
(Eds.),
Urban
design.
Minneapolis:
University
of
Minnesota
Press.
Osbaldeston,
Mark.
2008.
Unbuilt
Toronto:
a
history
of
the
city
that
might
have
been.
Toronto:
Dundurn
Press.
Relph,
E.
(1997).
Sense
of
place.
In
S.
Hanson
(Ed.),
Ten
geographic
ideas
that
changed
the
world.
New
Brunswick
NJ:
Rutgers
University
Press
11
Rossi,
Aldo,
and
Peter
Eisenman.
1982.
The
architecture
of
the
city.
Cambridge,
Mass:
MIT
Press.
Rowe,
Colin,
and
Fred
Koetter.
1978.
Collage
city.
Cambridge,
Mass:
MIT
Press.
Sewell,
John.
2009.
The
shape
of
the
suburbs:
understanding
Toronto's
sprawl.
Toronto:
University
of
Toronto
Press.
Sol-Morales
Rubi,
Ignasi,
and
Sarah
Whiting.
1997.Differences:
topographies
of
contemporary
architecture.
Cambridge,
Mass:
MIT
Press.
Solomon,
Lawrence.
2007.
Toronto
sprawls:
a
history.
Toronto:
University
of
Toronto
Press.
Talen,
E.,
&
Ellis,
C.
(2002).
Beyond
relativism:
reclaiming
the
search
for
good
city
form.
Journal
of
Planning
Education
and
Research,
22(1).
Wall,
A.
(1999).
Programming
the
urban
surface.
In
J.
Corner
(Ed.),
Recovering
landscape
:
essays
in
contemporary
landscape
architecture.
New
York:
Princeton
Architectural
Press.
12
APPENDIX A. SPADINA