You are on page 1of 25

Chapter

Chapter44

Personality and
Values

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S
E L E VTWELFTH
E N T HEDITION
E D I T I O N
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. WWW.PRENHALL.COM/ROBBINS PowerPoint
PowerPoint Presentation
Presentation
All rights reserved. by
by Charlie
Charlie Cook
Cook
What
What is
is Personality?
Personality?

Personality
The sum total of ways in which an individual reacts
and interacts with others.

Personality Traits
Enduring characteristics Personality
Personality
that describe an Determinants
Determinants
individual’s behavior. • •Heredity
Heredity
• •Environment
Environment
• •Situation
Situation

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–2


The
The Myers-Briggs
Myers-Briggs Type
Type Indicator
Indicator

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)


A personality test that taps four characteristics and
classifies people into 1 of 16 personality types.

Personality
PersonalityTypes
Types
• •Extroverted
Extrovertedvs.
vs.Introverted
Introverted(E(Eor
orI)I)
• •Sensing
Sensingvs.
vs.Intuitive
Intuitive(S
(Sor
orN)
N)
• •Thinking
Thinkingvs.
vs.Feeling
Feeling(T
(Tor
orF)
F)
• •Judging
Judgingvs.
vs.Perceiving
Perceiving(P(Por
orJ)J)

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–3


Myers-
Myers-
Briggs
Briggs
Sixteen
Sixteen
Primary
Primary
Traits
Traits

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–4


Locus
Locus of
of Control
Control
Locus of Control
The degree to which people believe they
are masters of their own fate.

Internals
Individuals who believe that they
control what happens to them.

Externals
Individuals who believe that
what happens to them is
controlled by outside forces
such as luck or chance.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–5


Self-Esteem
Self-Esteem and
and Self-Monitoring
Self-Monitoring

Self-Esteem (SE)
Individuals’ degree of liking
or disliking themselves.

Self-Monitoring
A personality trait that measures
an individuals ability to adjust
his or her behavior to external,
situational factors.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–6


Risk-Taking
Risk-Taking
 High Risk-taking Managers
– Make quicker decisions
– Use less information to make decisions
– Operate in smaller and more entrepreneurial
organizations
 Low Risk-taking Managers
– Are slower to make decisions
– Require more information before making decisions
– Exist in larger organizations with stable environments

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–7


Personality
Personality Types
Types
Type A’s
1. are always moving, walking, and eating rapidly;
2. feel impatient with the rate at which most events take place;
3. strive to think or do two or more things at once;
4. cannot cope with leisure time;
5. are obsessed with numbers, measuring their success in
terms of how many or how much of everything they acquire.

Type B’s
1. never suffer from a sense of time urgency with its
accompanying impatience;
2. feel no need to display or discuss either their achievements
or accomplishments;
3. play for fun and relaxation, rather than to exhibit their
superiority at any cost;
4. can relax without guilt.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–8
Personality
Personality Types
Types

Proactive Personality
Identifies opportunities,
shows initiative, takes
action, and perseveres
until meaningful change
occurs.
Creates positive change
in the environment,
regardless or even in
spite of constraints or
obstacles.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–9


Values
Values
Values
Basic convictions that a specific
mode of conduct or end-state of
existence is personally or socially
preferable to an opposite or
converse mode of conduct or
end-state of existence.

Value System
A hierarchy based on a ranking
of an individual’s values in terms
of their intensity.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–10
Importance
Importance of
of Values
Values

 Provide understanding of the attitudes,


motivation, and behaviors of individuals and
cultures.
 Influence our perception of the world around us.
 Represent interpretations of “right” and “wrong.”
 Imply that some behaviors or outcomes are
preferred over others.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–11


Types
Types of
of Values
Values –-
–- Rokeach
Rokeach Value
Value Survey
Survey

Terminal Values
Desirable end-states of
existence; the goals that a
person would like to achieve
during his or her lifetime.

Instrumental Values
Preferable modes of behavior
or means of achieving one’s
terminal values.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–12


Values
Valuesinin
the
the
Rokeach
Rokeach
Survey
Survey

Source: M. Rokeach, The Nature of Human


Values (New York: The Free Press, 1973).

E X H I B I T 3–1
E X H I B I T 3–1

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–13


Values
Valuesin in
the
the
Rokeach
Rokeach
Survey
Survey
(cont’d)
(cont’d)

Source: M. Rokeach, The Nature of Human


Values (New York: The Free Press, 1973).

E X H I B I T 3–1 (cont’d)
E X H I B I T 3–1 (cont’d)

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–14


Mean
MeanValue
ValueRankings
Rankingsof of
Executives,
Executives,Union
Union
Members,
Members,and
andActivists
Activists

Source: Based on W. C. Frederick and J. Weber, “The Values of


Corporate Managers and Their Critics: An Empirical Description and
Normative Implications,” in W. C. Frederick and L. E. Preston (eds.)
Business Ethics: Research Issues and Empirical Studies (Greenwich,
CT: JAI Press, 1990), pp. 123–44.

E X H I B I T 3–2
E X H I B I T 3–2

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–15


Dominant
Dominant Work
Work Values
Values in
in Today’s
Today’s Workforce
Workforce

E X H I B I T 3–3
E X H I B I T 3–3

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–16


Values,
Values, Loyalty,
Loyalty, and
and Ethical
Ethical Behavior
Behavior

Ethical Values and


Behaviors of Leaders

Ethical
Ethical Climate
Climate in
in
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–17
Hofstede’s
Hofstede’s Framework
Framework for
for Assessing
Assessing Cultures
Cultures

Power Distance
The extent to which a society accepts that
power in institutions and organizations is
distributed unequally.
low distance: relatively equal distribution
high distance: extremely unequal distribution

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–18


Hofstede’s
Hofstede’s Framework
Framework (cont’d)
(cont’d)
Individualism Collectivism
The degree to which A tight social framework in
people prefer to act as which people expect
individuals rather than others in groups of which
a member of groups. they are a part to look
after them and protect
them.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–19


Hofstede’s
Hofstede’s Framework
Framework (cont’d)
(cont’d)

Achievement
The extent to which societal
values are characterized by
assertiveness, materialism and
competition.

Nurturing
The extent to which societal
values emphasize relationships
and concern for others.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–20


Hofstede’s
Hofstede’s Framework
Framework (cont’d)
(cont’d)

Uncertainty Avoidance
The extent to which a society feels threatened by
uncertain and ambiguous situations and tries to
avoid them.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–21


Hofstede’s
Hofstede’s Framework
Framework (cont’d)
(cont’d)
Long-term Orientation
A national culture attribute
that emphasizes the future,
thrift, and persistence.

Short-term Orientation
A national culture attribute that
emphasizes the past and
present, respect for tradition,
and fulfilling social obligations.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–22


Achieving
Achieving Person-Job
Person-Job Fit
Fit

Personality-Job Fit
Theory (Holland)
Personality
PersonalityTypes
Types
Identifies six personality
types and proposes that ••Realistic
Realistic
the fit between personality ••Investigative
Investigative
type and occupational
••Social
Social
environment determines
satisfaction and turnover. ••Conventional
Conventional
••Enterprising
Enterprising
••Artistic
Artistic

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–23


Holland’s
Holland’s
Typology
Typologyof
of
Personality
Personality
and
and
Congruent
Congruent
Occupations
Occupations

E X H I B I T 4–2
E X H I B I T 4–2

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–24


Relationships
Relationships
among
among
Occupational
Occupational
Personality
Personality
Types
Types

Source: Reprinted by special permission of the publisher, Psychological


Assessment Resources, Inc., from Making Vocational Choices, copyright 1973, E X H I B I T 4–3
1985, 1992 by Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. E X H I B I T 4–3

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–25

You might also like