 Ain Sofea binti Mohd Hasim AD100126

 Nurul Khusna binti Mohd Salleh AD100123

 Nurulhidayah binti Kamjai AD100178
 Hazlinda binti Hashim AD100078
 Syafiqah Adawiyah binti Abdullah AD100171
 Noor Azira Said AD060097
. This was open fore and
aft, and it had a set of
louvers at the front. The
louvers opened as the shoe
moved forward, allowing
the box to move easily
through the water
 Several small flaps is used in the louver rather than one big one because
the shoe has to move backwards a distance roughly equal to the height
of the flaps in order to close them. The smaller the flaps, the faster the
closure.
 In the full-size shoes the flaps were pivoted at the bottom, so that their
buoyancy would cause them naturally to close the right way up.
 The swiveling rods on which the flaps were mounted were a very loose
fit in the holes in the sides of the box, to avoid any possible problems
with the wood swelling when it got wet.
 During testing we found that the buoyancy of the box gave the shoe a
tendency to capsize, so we bolted in a steel weight at the bottom of the
shoe, which fixed the problem but increased inertia.
 Made of a lightweight, buoyant material, such as
Styrofoam or plastic.
 safe for use in the water.
 can be made with particular toe and sole designs to
simulate the toe.
 to provide a shoe which is adapted to be loosely worn
on the foot to permit the wearer to walk through
water .
 to minimize production costs.
 Light
 Low cost
 High stability
 Eco- friendly
 Easy to manufactured
 Too simple design
 Not long lasting.
 Less protection to feet.