You are on page 1of 3

CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS VERIFICATION OF DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN FROM LIFT STATION NO.

3
1

TOTAL INPUT FLOW TO LS


diameter of incoming pipe D= = Velocily of flow in between 1.0 m/s & 1.50 m/s For RTR adopt Velocity (GRAVITY) TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM GRAVITY(FULL) V= Q(pipe)= 1.00 0.636 m/s cubic-mter/sec 900 0.900 mm m

TOTAL OUTPUT FLOW FROM PUMPS


TOTAL NO. OF PUMPS OPERATIONAL PUMPS STANDBY PUMPS DISCHARGE FROM ONE(1) PUMP = = = Q(pump)= = RISING MAIN DIA FOR PUMPS = = VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM PUMP V= V= TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM THREE(3) PUMPS Q(pumps)= 5 3 2 250 0.250 400 0.400 Q/A 1.99 0.750 NO. NO. NO. L/S cubic-mter/sec MM M M/S M/S cubic-mter/sec

DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN
VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM PUMP TOTAL RUNOFF V= Q(pipe)= 1.99 0.636 M/S cubic-mter/sec

3.1

CALCULATED DIA DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN D(forcemain)= = 0.638 638 m mm

3.2

AS BUILT DIAMETER DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN D(forcemain)= = 0.700 700 m mm OK

NOTE: CALCULATED DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN IS LESS THAN AS BUILT DIAMETER 3.3 CALCULATION OF THE VELOCITY OF FLOW FOR EXISTING (AS BUILT DIAMETER) DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN (EXISTING) TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM GRAVITY(FULL) VELOCITY IN THE EXISTING FORCEMAIN D(forcemain)= Q(pipe)= V= 0.700 0.636 1.65 m cubic-mter/sec M/S

OK

NOTE: VELOCITY IS LESS THAN RECOMMENDED VELOCITY OF FORCEMAIN I.E 3 M/S PEAK CONDITIONS 4 4.1

RECOMMENDATION:
ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON INCOMING FLOW TO LIFT STATION: IF THE GRAVITY LINE OF 900 MM DIAMETER DELIVER THE CALCULATED RUNOFF ( 0.636 CUBIC- METER/SEC) TO THE LIFT STATION NO.2 AND 3 PUMPS ARE WORKING AT A TIME WITH THEIR FULL CAPACITY OF 0.75 CUBIC -METER/SEC THEN WORKING EFFICENCY AND HEAD OF WATER IN STATION WILL BE CONTROLLED AND NO OVERFLOW WILL BE OCCURED.

4.2 4.2.1 4.2.1

DETAILED HYDRAULIC STUDY OF STORM NETWORK WILL BE REQUIRED .


EFFICENCY OF PUMPS EFFICENCY OF NETWORK SYSTEM (COLLECTION POINTS)

CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS VERIFICATION OF DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN FROM LIFT STATION NO.2
1

TOTAL INPUT FLOW TO LS


diameter of incoming pipe TO LS D= = Velocily of flow in between 1.0 m/s & 1.50 m/s For RTR adopt Velocity (GRAVITY) TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM GRAVITY(FULL) V= Q(pipe)= 1.00 1.131 m/s cubic-mter/sec 1200 1.200 mm m

TOTAL OUTPUT FLOW FROM PUMPS


TOTAL NO. OF PUMPS OPERATIONAL PUMPS STANDBY PUMPS DISCHARGE FROM ONE(1) PUMP = = = Q(pump)= = RISING MAIN DIA FOR PUMPS = = VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM PUMP V= V= TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM THREE(3) PUMPS Q(pumps)= 5 3 2 352 0.352 500 0.500 Q/A 1.79 1.056 NO. NO. NO. L/S cubic-mter/sec MM M M/S M/S cubic-mter/sec

DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN
VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM PUMP TOTAL RUNOFF V= Q(pipe)= 1.79 1.131 M/S cubic-mter/sec

3.1

CALCULATED DIAMETER DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN D(forcemain)= = 0.896 896 m mm

3.2

AS BUILT DIAMETER UP TO 30 M DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN D(forcemain)= = 1.000 1000 OK m mm

NOTE: CALCULATED DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN IS LESS THAN AS BUILT DIAMETER 3.3 CALCULATION OF THE VELOCITY OF FLOW FOR EXISTING (AS BUILT DIAMETER) DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN (EXISTING) TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM GRAVITY(FULL) VELOCITY IN THE EXISTING FORCEMAIN D(forcemain)= Q(pipe)= V= 1.000 1.131 1.44

m cubic-mter/sec M/S OK

NOTE: VELOCITY IS LESS THAN RECOMMENDED VELOCITY OF FORCEMAIN I.E 3 M/S PEAK CONDITIONS 3.4

PROPOSED DIAMETER OF 700 MM NEXT TO 1000 MM DIA UPTO 155 M IN LENGTH CONNECT TO EXISTING 700 MM DIA DIAMETER OF FORCEMAIN D(forcemain)= = TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM GRAVITY(FULL) VELOCITY IN THE EXISTING FORCEMAIN Q(pipe)= V= 0.700 700 1.131 2.94 m mm cubic-mter/sec M/S OK

NOTE: VELOCITY IS LESS THAN RECOMMENDED VELOCITY OF FORCEMAIN I.E 3 M/S PEAK CONDITIONS 4 4.1

RECOMMENDATION:
ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON INCOMING FLOW TO LIFT STATION: IF THE GRAVITY LINE OF 1200 MM DIAMETER DELIVER THE CALCULATED RUNOFF ( 1.131 CUBIC- METER/SEC) TO THE

LIFT STATION NO.2 AND 3 PUMPS ARE WORKING AT A TIME WITH THEIR FULL CAPACITY OF 1.056 CUBIC -METER/SEC THEN WORKING EFFICENCY AND HEAD OF WATER IN STATION WILL BE CONTROLLED AND NO OVERFLOW WILL BE OCCURED. 4.2 DETAILED HYDRAULIC STUDY OF STORM NETWORK WILL BE REQUIRED .

4.2.1 EFFICENCY OF PUMPS 4.2.2 EFFICENCY OF NETWORK SYSTEM (COLLECTION POINTS)

You might also like