The question is phrased by analogy with the way Kant phrased his question "How are synthetic a priori judgements possible?" in both cases, usuarry"(jeenfaken forgrantM-i"lr-tlfe one-case by Kant that synthetic priori judgments were possible, and in the other case in contemporary philosophical literature that contingent statements of identity are ible.
The question is phrased by analogy with the way Kant phrased his question "How are synthetic a priori judgements possible?" in both cases, usuarry"(jeenfaken forgrantM-i"lr-tlfe one-case by Kant that synthetic priori judgments were possible, and in the other case in contemporary philosophical literature that contingent statements of identity are ible.
The question is phrased by analogy with the way Kant phrased his question "How are synthetic a priori judgements possible?" in both cases, usuarry"(jeenfaken forgrantM-i"lr-tlfe one-case by Kant that synthetic priori judgments were possible, and in the other case in contemporary philosophical literature that contingent statements of identity are ible.