Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cau 1: Lam sach d lieu nh the nao? Loai cac phieu co nhieu o trong?
Cau 2: Xac nh gia tr tin cay cua cac thanh phan trong thang o: Cronbach Alpha
Yeu cau: 2
Item-Total Statistics
W1 W2 W3 W4
Yeu cau: kiem tra KMO and Bartlett's Test; ieu kien:
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. >0.5 Cumulative % Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings >50% Initial Eigenvalues: L gi tr phng sai tch ra c ca mi nhn t. V mong mun ca phn tch nhn t l ti a ho phng sai nn gi tr ti thiu ca phng sai l 1. Initial Eigenvalues: >1 Factor loading: >0.4 Pattern Matrix(a) Factor SUP SUP1 T3 SUP3 T1 T2 SUP4 COW4 1 0.820 0.811 0.622 0.583 0.499 0.431 0.287 2 3 4
0.239 0.886
-0.274
0.244
gioi trinh do LDPT trung cap cao dang dai hoc nam 6.22 6.61 6.33 5.35 nu 5.78 7.00 5.10 5.45
Cau 5: Tong hp (cong bien): long trung thanh cua nhan vien; mc o thoa man vi cong viec, ong nghiep, lanh ao, tien lng, c hoi ao tao, thang tien. Transform -> compute trong phan target variables: cong cac bien, chia so lng cac bien.
Cau 6: Kiem nh t-test (1 bien metric, 1 bien non- metric) one sample: so vi ket qua cua nam trc 4.2, nam nay co at mc cai thien ang ke khong? (analyze compare means one sample t - tests)
N sloy 131
Mean 5.7163
One-Sample Test Test Value = 4.2 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference sloy t 18.449 df 130 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 Mean Difference 1.51628 Lower 1.3537 Upper 1.6789
Paired sample t-test: Toi thoa man trong quan he vi ong nghiep hn hay thoa man vi lanh ao hn? Thoa man vi lng hn hay thoa man vi cong viec hn? (analyze compare means paired sample t - tests)
Independent t-tests: nam trung thanh hn hay n trung thanh cao hn? (analyze compare means independent sample t tests Lu : So snh thu nhp bnh qun gia nam v n khng ph hp vi loi kim tra ny, v khc bit v thu nhp bnh qun c th chu nh hng bi cc yu t nh hc vn, ch khng ch chu nh hng ca gii tnh. Trong tnh hung nh vy, nn bo m rng s khc bit cc yu t khc khng lm tng cng hay gim nh s khc bit ng k ca trung bnh.
Group Statistics
Cau 8: Kiem nh Chi bnh phng: bien nh danh. (analyze-nonparametric testschi-square OK) (giong praired t test bien la metric). CBNV thch quan diem thich dong vien vat chat hay tinh than (non metric)? 1. Dong vien vat chat. 2. Dong vien tinh than
10
quandiem Observed N 46 100 146 Test Statistics quandiem 19.973 1 Expected N 73.0 73.0 Residual -27.0 27.0
Chi-Square(a) df
Asymp. Sig. .000 a 0 cells (.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is 73.0.
(phai ln > 5)
ong c vat chat va tinh than khong giong nhau Cau 9 : Kiem nh ty le- phep kiem nh z (giong one sample test- metric bien so) Anh ch mong muon chnh sach nhan s nao can thay oi au tien. Vi 1: lng, 2: thng; 3: anh gia nhan vien; 4: ao tao,v.v 0: khong phai lng Analyze nonparamitric tests binomalnhap gia tr kiem tra: 60% p<0.05.
Binomial Test Category mong doi N Observed Prop. 0.712329 0.287671 1 Test Prop. 0.6 Asymp. Sig. (1-tailed) 0.003135
Cau 12: Moi quan he gi ahai bien nh danh- Kiem nh t-test (2 bien non- metric): Co moi quan he gia chc 11
12
mong muon * chucdanh Crosstabulation Count Truong phong 36 15 16 12 26 105 Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .198 .213 .303 chucdanh Ban Giam doc 39 7 14 16 18 94
mong muon
thu nhap -so 1 thu nhap -so 2 thu nhap-so 3 thu nhap-so 4 thu nhap-so 5
Total
df 8 8 1
a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.66.
Cau 10: So sanh trung bnh am ong: Kiem nh ANOVA: (1 bien metric, 1 bien non- metric) theo phan phoi chuan Co s khac biet ve mc o trung thanh theo trnh o hoc van?
13
Test of Homogeneity of Variances strungthanh Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. 0.454242 3 387 0.714446
14
33 154 391
4.8 4.8 5
Sum of Squares Between Groups Within Groups Total 13.32846 155.449 168.7775
df 3 387 390
F 11.06068
Sig. 5.56E-07
Std. Error
Sig.
TCap
caodang
daihoc+
TCap 0.100425 0.09837 0.737309 caodang 0.162069 0.138194 0.644425 daihoc+ 0.452978 0.097641 2.84E-05 LDPT -0.10043 0.09837 0.737309 caodang 0.061644 0.122161 0.957959 daihoc+ 0.352553 0.073209 1.25E-05 LDPT -0.16207 0.138194 0.644425 TCap -0.06164 0.122161 0.957959 daihoc+ 0.290909 0.121574 0.080128 LDPT -0.45298 0.097641 2.84E-05 TCap -0.35255 0.073209 1.25E-05 caodang -0.29091 0.121574 0.080128 The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Bound Bound -0.15339 0.354242 -0.1945 0.51864 0.201042 0.704914 -0.35424 0.153392 -0.25356 0.376846 0.163658 0.541448 -0.51864 0.194502 -0.37685 0.253559 -0.02278 0.604599 -0.70491 -0.20104 -0.54145 -0.16366 -0.6046 0.02278
non- metric) khong theo phan phoi chuan Co s khac biet ve mc o no lc co gang cua nhan vien theo cac cong ty thuoc ca ckhu vc khac nhau? (analyze-nonparametric tests K independence samples )
15
Test Statistics(a,b) Snoluc Chi-Square df Asymp. Sig. a b 9.561538 4 0.048498 Kruskal Wallis Test Grouping Variable: khu vuc
T choi gia thuyet Ho Co s khac biet ve mc o no lc co gang cua nhan vien thuoc cac khu vc khac nhau Cau 13: Moi quan he gia hai bien nh lng (metric): Long trung thanh va s hai long cua nhan vien Analyze correlate bivariate
16
Correlations shailong shailong strungthanh Pearson Correlation 1 0.634233 Sig. (2-tailed) 1.59E-47 N 417 410 Pearson Correlation 0.634233 1 Sig. (2-tailed) 1.59E-47 N 410 417 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
strungthanh
**
Cau 14: Hoi quy anh hng cua cac yeu to thoa man vi cong viec en long trung thanh cua CBNV?
17
18
Histogram
50
40
Frequency
30
20
0 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
19
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
20