10.1.0.0/16 .2 .

1
Router 2

.2
.2 12.1.0.0/16
Router 1

10.2.0.0/16

10.3.0.0/16

.1

+ 10.1.0.0/16 is same major net as sourcing of update 10.2.0.0/16 ?

-Yes: are they have same subnet mask? - Yes : advertise the subnet 10.1.0.0/16 + 12.1.0.0 /16 is same major net as sourcing of update 10.2.0.0/16 ? - No: Summarize to 12.0.0.0 to advertise Send update

+ Is 12.0.0.0 same major net as receiving interface 10.2.0.0/16 ?

-No: do any of this major net exist in RT? - No : Router 2 apply major net 12.0.0.0/8 to RT + 10.1.0.0 /16 same major net as receiving interface 10.2.0.0/16 ? - Yes:Router 2 apply mask of receiving interface (/16) to subnet Receive update

Same major
Y N

Summarize to major
Y

Same major

Subnet in RT

Same mask
Y

Advertise update

Install route using receiving mask interface

Install major route

Discontiguous network 172.16.0.0/16 .1

Router 2

10.2.0.0/16

.2
.2 10.1.0.0/16
Router 1

.1

+ 10.1.0.0/16 is same major net as sourcing of update 172.16.0.0/16 ? + Is 10.0.0.0 same major net as receiving interface 172.16.0.0/16 ? -No:Summarize to 10.0.0.0 to advertise -No: do any of this major net exist in RT known from interfaces other than that which received the update? - Yes : Router 2 ignore the update

Using debug ip rip to see update

Static route:
ip route network [ mask ] { address | interface } [ distance ] [ permanent ]

On Router 1: ip route 10.2.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.16.0.1 On Router 2 ip route 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.16.0.2