Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Global
Emerging Markets Not Untouched: Many large emerging markets face slowing growth and macroeconomic policy or rebalancing challenges. This is even as emerging market economies generally are showing impressive resilience to tough global conditions and are outperforming developed countries. US Recovery Uncertain: The weak US recovery reflects the gradual rebalancing of the economy, such as the unwinding of excessive household debt and the housing market correction, rather than a permanent downshift in the growth rate of the economy. Risks include uncertainty regarding fiscal policy and the diminished capacity for significant fiscal and monetary policy stimulus. Outlooks Turn More Negative: The proportion of ratings with negative outlooks roughly doubled in the last six months in the sovereign, international public finance, financial institution and insurance sectors. The root cause is the eurozone sovereign crisis, which continues to percolate through to other sectors and, to an increasing extent, other regions. By contrast, greater stability was shown in US public finance, corporates and infrastructure. Downturn Exceeds Expectations: The combination of continued downgrades and rising negative outlooks illustrates that the depth and magnitude of the downturn has exceeded initial expectations. There does not appear to be a credible plan that has convinced markets that sovereigns, and in some cases their banking systems, have the resources or ability to put their fiscal, financial and asset quality on a sustainable path to long-term repair. Eurozone Sovereigns Pressured: The eurozone crisis, which threatens both the global economic and credit outlook, had a strong impact on sovereign rating outlooks. Fitch believes the crisis is likely to be prolonged. Downward pressure on eurozone sovereign ratings will persist until European leaders articulate a credible and substantive road-map towards greater fiscal, financial and political integration. Rating Mix Weakens Further: The universe of highest grade ratings (AAA and AA) continues to shrink, with all eight global sectors experiencing reductions since the end of 2010. The sharpest decline occurred in international public finance, where eurozone sovereign downgrades had a negative knock-on effect and the high-grade rating segment halved to 26%. For other sectors, the reduction was in the single-digit percentage point range.
Figure 1
Related Research
Appendix Eurozone webpage
Analysts
Monica Insoll +44 20 3530 1060 monica.insoll@fitchratings.com Mariarosa Verde +1 212 908 0791 mariarosa.verde@fitchratings.com Trevor Pitman (Regional Credit Officer EMEA and APAC) +44 20 3530 1059 trevor.pitman@fitchratings.com Eileen Fahey (Regional Credit Officer US) +1 312 368 5468 eileen.fahey@fitchratings.com
a
Rating Outlooks
Negative outlooks (% of portfolio) 60
Corporates US Publ Fin SF Intl Publ Fin Sovereign Finl Inst Infrastructure
45 30
15 0 Q307
Q108
Q308
Q109
Q309
Q110
Q310
Q111
Q311
Q112
(Quarter/year)
Source: Fitch
www.fitchratings.com
23 July 2012
The systemic crisis engulfing the eurozone continues to threaten the global economic and credit outlook. The near-term risk of a Greek exit from the euro and subsequent potential severe contagion to other countries has fallen following Greek parliamentary elections in June. However, the crisis is likely to be prolonged and downward pressure on eurozone sovereign ratings is unlikely to diminish until European leaders articulate a credible and substantive roadmap towards greater fiscal, financial and political integration. New shocks centred on the eurozone are slowing the global recovery, which is creating a more difficult backdrop for sovereign credit. Fitch and consensus projections for global growth have been revised down successively over the past 12 months. Fitch forecasts global GDP growth to slow to just 2.2% in 2012 from 2.7% in 2011, before gradually firming to 2.8% in 2013 and 3.1% in 2014. Risks are skewed to the downside, though lower oil prices could offer some respite.
Figure 2 Figure 3
Negative Outlooks
(% of portfolio) 40 30 20 10 0
Q307 Q108 Q308 Q109 Q309 Q110 Q310 Q111 Q311 Q112
Rating Distribution
As at 30 Jun 2012
EM All B 20% CCC & below 1%
DM
Developed Markets
Eurozone debt crisis intensifies again
Intensification of eurozone crisis. Comment 1 Global economic recovery stalls. Comment 2 Sharp and sustained fall in commodity prices would create winners and losers.
The severity of the eurozone debt crisis intensified again in Q212 with weakening growth prospects, accelerating private sector capital outflows from so-called peripheral countries, high sovereign bond yields and a rising political backlash against austerity. At their summit on 28-29 June, EU leaders announced some positive policy steps that eased downward pressure on eurozone sovereign ratings somewhat. These included measures to increase the flexibility of providing financial support to member states as well as plans to create a 'single supervisory mechanism' for banks, which could be an important step towards a form of banking union. Implementation risk is high. Meanwhile, governments must deliver fiscal consolidation and structural reforms to underpin confidence in debt sustainability and medium-term growth prospects (See Fitch: Summit Eases Near-Term Pressures on Euro Sovereign Ratings). There has been a dramatic deterioration in Spains credit-worthiness this year owing to the increased cost of bank recapitalisation, deeper recession, upward revisions of fiscal deficits and targets, rising projections of the public debt ratio and tightening funding conditions. Spains size and potential contagion to Italy makes it more systemically important than Greece and more symptomatic of fundamental design flaws in Economic and Monetary Union. The near-term risk of a Greek exit from the euro has fallen following the victory of New Democracy in Greeces second parliamentary elections this year and the formation of a new government that is supportive of the EUR173bn EU-IMF programme. However, the economic contraction is continuing apace and the country's liquidity position is deteriorating, underscoring the urgency of reaching agreement with the EU/IMF on the programme and a resumption of disbursements. Fiscal austerity and painful structural reform combined with a strong opposition led by the Syriza political party means risks remain acute.
Emerging Markets
Impressive economic resilience
Emerging market (EM) economies are generally continuing to show impressive resilience to tough global conditions and to outperform developed countries. However, several large EMs, including China, India, Brazil and Turkey, are facing slowing growth and macroeconomic policy or rebalancing challenges. Global economic and financial uncertainty and the potential for severe shocks highlight the importance of strong buffers in terms of government balance sheets, external finances, and robust policy frameworks for EM sovereign credit profiles. Major commodity producers with weaker balance sheets and policy frameworks would face more difficult circumstances in the event of a further and sustained drop in international commodity prices.
Public Finance US
Figure 4 Figure 5
Negative Outlooks
(% of portfolio) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Q307 Q108 Q308 Q109 Q309 Q110 Q310 Q111 Q311 Q112
Rating Distribution
Rev. supported Tax supported All
As at 30 Jun 2012
B 0.3% BB 1.8% BBB 8.2% A 26.4% AA 49.8% CCC & below 0.3% AAA 13.2%
Key Risks
Rising healthcare, pension and other benefit related costs. Downshifting of state responsibilities to local governments. Weak real estate market. Slow economic recovery.
Negative Outlooks
(% of portfolio) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Q409 Q110 Q210 Q310 Q410 Q111 Q211 Q311 Q411 Q112 Q212
Rating Distribution
As at 30 Jun 2012
AAA 12% AA 14%
B 8% BB 17%
A 23%
Source: Fitch
Developed Markets
For IPF, Negative Outlooks now outnumber Stable Outlooks, suggesting that more downgrades are likely. As many subnationals depend on central governments for transfers of varying but significant proportions of their revenues, their ratings are often closely linked to those of the sovereign where they are located. At times of financial stress, the ties often become stronger as central governments may seek additional controls over the expenditure of subnationals, and subnationals themselves may seek to borrow from the sovereign if access to the markets is either too expensive or not available. Deterioration in the ratings of Italy and Spain in H112 has resulted in subnationals in these countries being downgraded but also in ratings compression, with about half of subnational ratings now rated at the level of the sovereign. Reflecting the sovereign ratings, virtually all are on Negative Outlook. In view of the sovereigns remaining on Negative Outlook, further downgrades cannot be excluded and the economic climate, including central government transfers to subnationals, could worsen. Access to financing has become more restricted. Regions and municipalities with special status in these countries continue to be rated above the sovereign in view of their legally enshrined tax raising powers. Subnationals in more highly rated eurozone countries have seen substantial stability in their ratings which, barring any sovereign downgrades, Fitch expects to continue. However as Belgium and France, together with the non-eurozone UK have Negative Outlooks, the possibility of downgrades remains. There has been some pressure on revenues and subnationals are seeking to cut expenses and capital investment in response to smaller central government transfers. Expenses linked to the provision of statutory services may prove harder to cut, limiting flexibility. The downgrades of Italy and Spain explain the large decrease in AA ratings in the past year and the increase in A, BBB and BB rating. Upgrading some of the lowest-rated issuers in Europe has led to a decrease in B ratings.
Key Risks
Ratings of some eurozone subnationals closely linked to sovereign. In eurozone, smaller central government transfers puts pressure on subnational budgets. Rigidities in expenditure may hamper financial flexibility.
Emerging Markets
In Russia structural improvements in management and the economy contributed to upgrades for four regions in H112 and two further regions have a Positive Outlook. Poland, Romania, Turkey also have subnationals with a Positive Outlook, as do Nigeria and Korea. For Poland, Romania, Russia and Turkey, economic growth is likely to slow in 2012, so any upgrades would be selective. In Mexico around a quarter of the National ratings are on Negative Rating Watch or Outlook, often as a result of worsening debt burdens, indicating downgrades are possible. Rating outlooks in other countries suggest greater stability.
Financial Institutions
Figure 8 Figure 9
Negative Outlooks
EMEA (% of portfolio) 60 45 30 15 0
Q307 Q108 Q308 Q109 Q309 Q110 Q310 Q111 Q311 Q112
Rating Distribution
NA All
As at 30 Jun 2012
CCC & below 1% B 11% BB 14% AAA 1% AA 6%
EM
A 32%
Source: Fitch
Key Risks
Support for banks may pressure sovereign resources and ratings, creating a negative feedback cycle that makes implementation of corrective actions difficult. Austerity measures by sovereigns may produce additional pressure on economies or add to duration of economic weakness. Incremental funding remains highly reliant on secured and or government related sources.
Developed Europe
The risks facing banks in developed Europe remain heightened. The rating outlook is decidedly negative for banks in the peripheral countries, with more stability in the remainder of the region. An improvement in the economic picture will likely accompany credible and durable solutions for the sovereign and bank problems across the region. The recently completed summit of EU leaders offered promise that solutions to the more difficult aspects of the eurozone crisis can be found. But such solutions will take time and are accompanied by execution and implementation challenges. The Greek elections also removed the immediate risk of a disorderly and highly disruptive set of events being put in motion. However, intermediate risks remains due to the lack of a defined plan for Greece. In Spain, there is heightened concern for property markets. The resulting impact on bank solvency is evidence that banks cannot escape the challenges in peripheral countries although the degree of rating impact will vary based on the strength of the sovereign. Fitchs stress tests for Spains banks highlight that the largest banks have the resources to withstand significant further write-offs although the entire bank system requires additional resources. A recently announced programme to provide EUR100bln for Spains banks would cover needs identified in Fitchs extreme stress, but will not in itself return stability to bank ratings in the country.
North America
The credit outlook for US banks continues to be stable. Challenges remain in the form of still weak conditions surrounding residential real estate, funding markets where conditions have improved but have not returned to pre-crisis levels and an operating environment dominated by weak growth and high unemployment. Steps taken to build capital and liquidity should allow banks to meet heightened regulatory standards and to navigate what could be an uneven economic recovery. However, compliance with such standards and adjusting to restrictions on business activities has raised expense levels and pressured revenue growth. Canadian banks continue to demonstrate consistent and relatively robust performance. The Canadian residential real estate market has been a source of growth and some trends in home prices have mirrored those in other markets that later were proven to have real estate bubbles. Fitch has stress-tested the major Canadian banks for a sharp correction in home prices and capital levels have proven to provide an acceptable buffer. However, implications for a correction in real estate prices could have implications beyond the recognition of credit losses as a real estate contraction may manifest in lower consumer spending levels or higher unemployment across construction or related sectors.
Emerging Markets
EM banks remain a bright spot relative to banks in developed markets. Banks are exhibiting solid performance and are maintaining appropriate buffers in the face of decelerating economic growth in some key markets. The dominance of locally sourced funds providing majority of funding needs adds another level of stability and a layer of insulation from the more disrupted developed markets. Earnings capacity and capital levels remain sufficient to absorb expected
Outlook Trend
Most sector outlooks across the globe are stable Markets with negative sector outlooks include Italy, Russia and French Life.
Insurance
Eurozone concerns are the primary risk that could lead to increased downgrade activity during the balance of 2012. A hypothetical Greek exit from the euro, if orderly, would be expected to have limited impact on insurers, which are less exposed than banks to related contagion risks because of insurers' ability to share losses with policyholders and their lower reliance on shortterm funding. However, a hypothetical disorderly Greek exit could lead to contagion risks that could materially impact European insurers ratings. Many European insurers hold significant asset allocation in sovereign and bank debt creating vulnerability to any weakness in credit quality or liquidity of these securities. Potentially offsetting some potential future stress would be a temporary relaxation of capital requirements by the regulators. Significant disruptions in global capital markets could adversely impact non-European insurance company ratings. Insurers in Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain are mostly rated at the same level as the sovereign which, in all cases, remains on Negative Outlook. This signals a risk of further downgrades. In early June 2012, Fitch downgraded the Insurer Financial Strength rating of Mapfre to BBB to align it with the sovereign rating on Spain.
Figure 10 Figure 11
Key Risks
Sovereign risk contagion. Low interest rates. Regulatory capital changes. Uncertain pricing cycle uplift.
Negative Outlooks
EMEA (% of portfolio) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Q307 Q108 Q308 Q109 Q309 Q110 Q310 Q111 Q311 Q112
Rating Distribution
NA All
As at 30 Jun 2012
B BB 1.0% 3.0% AAA 0.5% AA 8.9%
BBB 36.9%
A 49.8%
Source: Fitch
Source: Fitch
Life
Fitch does not anticipate any meaningful risk from a potential run on eurozone life insurers by policyholders in the event of consumer panic, because insurers' exposure to guaranteed surrender values is minimal. Insurance companies can, and do, impose significant surrender penalties - which deter policyholders and mitigate the impact on the balance sheet Globally, life insurers face earnings pressure, as low interest rates are dampening profitability. Compounding this pressure on earnings is an increase in hedging costs. The recent extension of Operation Twist by the US Federal Reserve is likely to add to this margin pressure. US and Japanese life insurers continue to see modest improvements in their balance sheets, as capital and asset quality continue to rebound from their recent low points.
Non-Life
Operating results in 2012 to date have recovered from last year, when the industry was hit by large catastrophe losses. Competitive underwriting conditions continue to impact underwriting results. Workers compensation, the largest US casualty business line, should improve its weak performance of recent years but is not likely to generate an underwriting gain.
Outlook Trend
Increase in negative outlooks. Slowdown in pace of US upgrades.
Corporates
Figure 12 Figure 13
Negative Outlooks
EMEA (% of portfolio) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Q307 Q108 Q308 Q109 Q309 Q110 Q310 Q111 Q311
Rating Distribution
EM All
NA
As at 30 Jun 2012
CCC & below 1.8% B 15.8% AAA 0.1% AA 1.7% A 19.7%
Key Risks
European recession; slow growth also in US and EM. US federal budget impasse. Acute financial crisis.
Q112
Source: Fitch
North America
The outlook trend for credit quality for North American corporates is becoming more negative as lower growth in the US, China and other EMs, as well as the developing recession in Europe, are bound to have a negative impact on revenues and profitability. As many companies have geographically diversified their sales, exposure to Europe is significant in several sectors, such as automotive and manufacturing. A European recession would mainly put pressure on low sub-investment grade entities while investment grade companies should remain less affected. Homebuilding activity in the US has begun to increase from historic lowsand may have hit bottom and begun to recover. Housing starts are up 26% over 2011 year-to date (through May), a large enough number to be unambiguously positive and significant. However, these increases are from levels so low that it will be several years before housing makes its normal contribution to GDP.
EMEA
Fitchs base case forecasts for EMEA corporates continue to include anaemic growth assumptions. Corporates continue to be cautious with capital expenditure, share buyback commitments and, for some, cash dividends are being reduced (whether through scrip or general dividend cuts). The liquidity profiles for peripheral eurozone corporate issuers are adequate, with the majority having sufficient liquidity until 2014. Although 60% of the peripheral portfolio is on RWN or Negative Outlook, this is dominated by utilities in Italy and Spain in turn, reflecting government interference in their remuneration framework. Issuer and sectorspecific factors, rather than EU sovereign downgrades, have been and are expected to be the core driver of adverse corporate rating actions.
Asia-Pacific
The Asian engine is slowing but still remains a strong growth story for corporates. Many business profiles have been adjusted to focus on domestic and regional growth opportunities, at the expense of lower growth developed markets. Slower growth in China continues to have an impact on the region but the rated universe constitutes the best-in-class companies.
High Yield
Buoyant US high-yield bond issuance in H112 has provided strong support for refinancing. As issuer credit profiles have stabilized in recent quarters, slightly tighter market conditions may limit access, especially for lower rated companies. Investor demand should remain relatively
The Credit Outlook July 2012
Global infrastructure and project finance ratings outlooks are broadly unchanged since January 2012, with some new negative outlooks reflecting regional, industry or asset specific stress. Region-related outlook change is focussed in Europe and specifically in the southern region. Industry-related outlook changes centre primarily on merchant power assets in the United States.
Figure 14 Figure 15
Negative Outlooks
NA (% of portfolio) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Q309 Q409 Q110 Q210 Q310 Q410 Q111 Q211 Q311 Q411 Q112 Q212
Rating Distribution
EM All
WE
As at 30 Jun 2012
B 5% BB 8% CCC & below 2% AAA 4% AA 22%
A 36%
Source: Fitch
Key Risks
Recession spreading in Europe. Low growth in the US and Latin America. Government budget pressure destabilising project cash flows.
EMEA
Continuing economic and financial stresses within Europe are eroding the core stability of the infrastructure sector. Medium-term prospects for infrastructure assets vary significantly and are driven by a combination of the economic and political dynamic of respective countries, and the relative essentiality of the asset. This is seen primarily in large mature transportation networks in southern Europe where Fitch has revised its outlooks to negative from stable. Having performed in the first downturn, the new recession is now affecting even these stronger assets. Regional airports with high leverage and large refinance requirements have a negative outlook in contrast to the large gateways where the outlook remains stable. The outlook for the renewable energy sector in Europe is stable/negative on concerns that government budget pressures may induce revisions in subsidy, support and incentive regimes. Similarly, although public sector grantors continue to meet obligations on social infrastructure projects, budget pressures can lead to delayed payment or increased dispute.
Negative Outlooks
EMEA (% of portfolio) 50 40 30 20 10 0
Q109 Q209 Q309 Q409 Q110 Q210 Q310 Q410 Q111 Q211 Q311 Q411 Q112 Q212
Rating Distribution
NA All
As at 30 Jun 2012
CCC & below 15% B 9% BB 11% BBB 14% A 16% AA 10%
AAA 25%
(Quarter/year)
Note: the data in Figure 16 reflects numbers of tranches giving bias to thinner subordinated tranches at the expense of thicker senior tranches. Subordinated tranches are more likely to have Negative Outlooks, while senior ones are more likely to have a Stable Outlook. Furthermore, senior tranches are usually paid down first, which will increase the proportion of subordinated tranches. Ratings that have moved into distressed categories are not assigned Outlooks. This also affects the relative proportions of Outlooks Source: Fitch
US
Key Risks
Further deterioration in eurozone sovereign issues. Lack of sustained economic recovery in US.
In US Structured Finance (SF), the expectation is for continued stabilisation in the outlook for rating performance. However the pace is now less certain than at the beginning of the year. Economic recovery in the US has slowed, and improvement in unemployment has stalled. Moreover, the negative impact of eurozone volatility on domestic capital markets is more persistent than many anticipated. These factors have risen in relative importance and increased downside risk. ABS should continue to demonstrate the highest level of rating stability among the four major SF sectors while uncertainty on the pace of recovery in the housing market will continue to weigh on RMBS ratings. ABS rating outlooks remain stable or positive for most core sectors, with the exception of student loans. Auto loan ABS rating outlooks remain positive, reflecting low delinquencies, strong used-vehicle values, rapid amortisation of the capital structures, and higher credit enhancement of recent vintages. Credit card ABS continues to have stable rating outlooks, driven by favourable asset performance trends. Downside risk for credit card ABS from a renewed downturn is mitigated by strong credit enhancement and robust structures. In contrast, US federal (FFELP) and private student loan ABS generally continue to have negative rating outlooks. AAAsf ratings on public student loan transactions are typically linked to the US sovereign rating (AAA/Negative) due to government guarantee of the collateral, while private student loan transactions continue to be negatively impacted by high unemployment rates and limited job prospects for recent graduates and aggressive structuring of pre-recession transactions. CMBS rating outlooks continue to be largely stable for higher-rated classes, and current ratings incorporate assumptions of incremental stresses to asset performance and refinancing availability. Negative outlooks are concentrated in lower-rated classes, which are more vulnerable to volatility from underperforming properties. Commercial real estate fundamentals are generally continuing to improve; however trends remain mixed both in terms of property types as well as markets. Multifamily and hotel properties have generally shown faster improvement relative to other property types, such as non-core office properties and retail malls in secondary markets. The long legal final maturity dates of most US CMBS allow an extended period for workout and refinancing of underlying property loans.
10
EMEA
2012 has seen further deterioration in the European economy particularly within the peripheral eurozone countries. Sovereign downgrades have led to rating caps on the maximum achievable SF rating above the sovereign being implemented in Greece, Ireland, Portugal and most recently Spain. Many senior SF rated tranches in these countries remain on negative outlook reflecting heightened sovereign risk, regardless of asset performance. While low interest rates have helped to support the performance to date of certain underlying SF assets, it is expected that the systemic crisis in the eurozone, absent any credible plan for resolution, will continue have an adverse impact on growth prospects and ultimately on the underlying collateral performance. In the event a Greek euro exit becomes probable, the contagion effect and likely impact upon the wider economy would put pressure on SF ratings, particularly in the peripheral countries Prospects for unemployment will continue to be the key driver of consumer ABS performance. In the UK, increasing unemployment will place upward pressure on delinquency and charge-off levels for credit card ABS, reversing some of the improvement reported since 2009. In Germany, a reduction in unemployment is expected to support strong auto ABS performance. The rating outlook is stable for UK and stable to positive for German auto ABS. Fitch maintains a negative outlook for Italian and Spanish consumer ABS transactions, mainly driven by sovereign and counterparty issues rather than by immediate asset performance concerns. The rating outlook is stable for RMBS from most core countries of which the UK and the Netherlands are the largest. The rating outlook for RMBS for periphery eurozone countries is negative, taking into account sovereign and counterparty risk. With increasing pressure on the periphery, Fitch expects a further deterioration in RMBS performance in Portugal, Greece, Spain, Ireland, and, to some degree, Italy. Although mortgage loans in these markets are predominantly variable rate and interest rates are at historical lows, high and still rising unemployment and the increasing effect of austerity measures are expected to translate into higher arrears in the second half of 2012 and into 2013. The expiry of forbearance measures in Italy and restrictions on repossessions in Ireland are embedded in the agencys assumptions but the volatile situation could see changes to such measures in peripheral countries and could alter Fitchs expectations. Refinance risk continues to be the key concern in CMBS. With banks restricting new lending, pressure is mounting on borrowers and servicers to secure alternative refinancing by maturity. While non-banks such as insurers and fund managers are weighing opportunities to lend on prime collateral, this is unlikely to be sufficient to absorb loans secured by
11
Covered Bonds
Since the start of the year rating actions on sovereigns and banks in several eurozone countries caused corresponding downgrades of covered bonds. Countries that have been particularly affected are Cyprus, Greece, Italy and Spain, where most covered bonds remain on rating watch negative with the potential for further deterioration. Also, Fitch has published Exposure Draft: Global Covered Bonds Rating Criteria in which the agency presents potential changes to its rating methodology. If all key proposals were to be implemented then a possible 22 further programmes would be downgraded by one to two notches. The outlook for covered bond programmes in the rest of Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand is stable. Overall, the sector shows strong credit fundamentals, with 84 out of 127 programmes rated AAA and 15 in the AA category. In addition, the sector enjoys continued support from global markets and regulation: global investors show a preference for secured debt, new covered bond legislation is due to be passed in several countries and central bank facilities as well as capital regulation treatment favour covered bonds over securitisation and unsecured debt. Risks mainly stem from sovereign finances and the stability of the local banking systems.
12
Public Finance - US
U.S. Public Power Peer Study -- June 2012 (June 2012) Update on California Redevelopment Agencies (June 2012) California Water Agencies (June 2012) Local Fiscal Stress and State Intervention (June 2012) Capital Expenditure Trends Among Nonprofit Hospitals (May 2012) 2011 Median Ratios for U.S. Public Colleges and Universities (May 2012) For-Profit Hospital Quarterly Diagnosis: Fourth-Quarter 2011 (April 2012) Illinois Property Tax Exemption Battle (April 2012) Improving Comparability of State Liabilities (April 2012) Governors Budget a Mixed Bag for California School Districts (March 2012) Ohio School Districts Under Continued Financial Strain (February 2012) U.S. Public Finance Rating Actions 2011 (January 2012) State Housing Finance Agencies Statistical Information (January 2012) 2012 U.S. Public Finance Outlooks (January 2012)
13
Financial Institutions
US Banking Quarterly Comment: 1Q12 (June 2012) 1Q12 Bank Capital Ratios (June 2012) Greek Exit Scenario for Eurozone Banks (June 2012) The Credit Crisis Four Years On (June 2012) Chinese Banks: Growth of Broad Credit Decelerating But Still Outpacing GDP (June 2012) Japanese Banking Prudential Regulations (May 2012) EM Banking System Datawatch (May 2012) U.S. Banks Deferred Tax Assets (May 2012) Captive Finance Companies (May 2012) Global Bank Rating Trends Q112 (April 2012) Improving Funding Profile for French Banks (April 2012) French Banks Progress on Deleveraging (April 2012) Major Portuguese Banks: Portuguese Banks Remain on Shaky Ground (March 2012) Higher Real Estate Coverage for Spanish Banks (March 2012) U.S. Banks C&I Lending Trends (No Cause for Near-Term Concern, Despite Expected Credit Deterioration) (March 2012) U.S. Banks - CCAR Preview (March 2012) European Banks Use of LTRO (February 2012) U.S. Banking Quarterly Review: 4Q11 (Now For the Cost Cutting) (February 2012) U.S. Housing and Bank Balance Sheets (February 2012) Fitch Core Capital: The Primary Measure of Bank Capitalisation (January 2012)
Insurance
European Insurers Capable of Withstanding Orderly Greek Exit (June 2012) Healthcare Reform Update - Insurance (June 2012) Japanese Life Insurers: Capital Adequacy Improving Steadily (June 2012) Workers' Compensation Insurance Market Update (June 2012) Nordic Insurance: A Strong Industry Set for Growth (May 2012) 2012 Hurricane Season: A Desk Reference for Insurance Investors (May 2012) Title Insurers 2011 Risk-Adjusted Capital Adequacy (May 2012) Asia-Pacific Catastrophes Highlight Limitations in Risk Assessment (May 2012) U.S. Insurance Broker Industry Sector Credit Factors (May 2012) 2012 Global Reinsurance Update (April 2012) Property/Casualty Insurers' Financial Leverage and Debt-Servicing Capacity (April 2012) Commercial Lines Underwriting Performance (April 2012) UK Life Insurers Sheltered from Eurozone Peripherals (March 2012) Insurer Ratings Drop Modestly Over 2007-10, Now Stable (March 2012) Life Insurers' Investment Portfolios (Results of Fitchs Year-End 2010 Survey) (March 2012) Eurozone Sovereign Risks - Impact on Insurers (February 2012) EU Captive Market at Risk From Solvency II (January 2012)
14
Structured Finance
Assessing Tax Risk in German Structured Finance Transactions (June 2012) U.S. Credit Card ABS Stress Test (June 2012) Fitch RMBS Performance Metrics (June 2012) Fitch RMBS Loss Metrics (June 2012) Credit Crisis Four Years on Summary Report (June 2012) EMEA Auto ABS Primer (June 2012) Lending Standards Still Key to Australian Mortgage Delinquency Rates (June 2012) Consumer Over-Indebtedness in France on the Rise (June 2012) U.S. CMBS Stress Test (June 2012) European CMBS Loan Maturity Bulletin - June 2012 (June 2012)
15
16
Credit Policy
Ratings Under Eurozone Country Redenomination (May 2012) Risk Radar (April 2012)
17
18
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE.
Copyright 2012 by Fitch, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. One State Street Plaza, NY, NY 10004.Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings, Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitchs factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third-party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitchs ratings should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided as is without any representation or warranty of any kind. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion is based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at anytime for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
19