1st WORKSHOP OF ANEE /August 24th 2012

Asian Network for Environment and Energy

Dr.LeHungAnh HoChiMinhCityUniversityofIndustry

HoChiMinhCity,August24th 2012

1. Introduction 2. 2 Methodology 3. Results 4. Conclusion

INTRODUCTION
Cultivationandproductionofnatural rubberhasahistoryofover170years Rubbertrees(Hevea brasiliensis) Rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) werebroughtbyFrenchintoVietnam from1878 Thefirstrubbermanufacturing The first rubber manufacturing companyinLongKhanh DongNai wasestablishedin1907 RubberplantationareaVietnamwas Rubber plantation area Vietnam was upto834.2000hain2011,11.4% highercomparedto2010. Rubbercompaniesproduced811,600 Rubber companies produced 811 600 tonnes oflatex

INTRODUCTION

For1tonofnaturalrubber:20 40m ofwastewaterand1 2m 40 m3 of wastewater and 12 m3 ofsludge g g Usingorganicfertilizerfor rubbertree:1200 2500kg /ha/year

RUBBER SLUGDE QUALITY Parameter P pH Total N Total P2O5 Total K2O Organic Matter C:N Moisture mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg g g mg/kg % Unit U i Rubber l d R bb sludge 6.04 3.61 9.32 9 32 2.02 49.48 7.8:1 78,8

RUBBER SLUDGE QUALITY

Element Unit Rubber sludge Limit Values Limit Values Limit Values of Poland of Germany of Korea

Pb Cd Cr Ni Hg As

mg/kg g g mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

3.35 0.13 27.67 35,02 35 02 0.035 0.38

500 10 500 100 5 -

200 3 300 100 5 -

150 5 300 50 2 5

COMPOSTING PROCESS

C:NRatio20 40:1 Moisture5060% pH5.5 9.0

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

SludgefromXuan Laprubberfactory

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

CoconutFiber(Coir)

RiceHusk

WaterHyacinth

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Buckets:30liter,insulationwrap,drainageholesatthebottom Buckets: 30 liter insulation wrap drainage holes at the bottom Compostingtime:6weeks Mixing:everyweek

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Heap:1.5m3,onwaterproofcement,coveredbycanvas p , p , y Compostingtime:6weeks Mixing:everyweek

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Experiment1
Formula CT1.1 CT1.2 Coir (%) 0 5 Sludge(%) 100 95
laboratoryscale

CT1.3 10 90

CT1.4 15 85

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Experiment2
Formula CT2.1 CT2.2 CT2.3 CT2.4 MO No Biosystem Biomix Trichoderma

laboratoryscale

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Experiment3 p
Formula
Addition MO

CT3.1 CT3.2
No No Ricehusk Rice husk Biomix

CT3.3
Water Water hyacinth Biomix

CT3.4
Coir Biomix

Formula
Addition MO

CT3.5
Ricehusk Biosystem

CT3.6
Water hyacinth Biosystem

CT3.7
Coir Biosystem

pilotscale

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

DuringComposting
Temperature pH Moisture Settlementof soilorganism il i

Color

Smell

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Compostqualitycontrol l l
pH Moisture M it C:NRatio Organic Matter TotalN Total N TotalP TotalK l HelpfulMO Helpful MO Coliform Salmonella S l ll

RESULTS

Maturecompostwithwormsettlement

Compostqualityinexperiment1 Compost quality in experiment 1

Parameter P t
pH Total C (%) Total N (%) C:N ratio Total P (P2O5) (%) Total K (K2O) (%) Moisture (%) Helpful Microorganism (cfu/g) Coliform (cfu/g)

CT 1.1 0% Coir 6.3 19.87 1.54 6.6:1 7.64 2.98 2 98 55.85 5.6 5.6106 4.9 4.9107

CT 1.2 5% Coir 6.4 25.64 1.76 14.5:1 8.25 2.94 2 94 60.28 8.9 8.9107 4.1 4.1106

CT 1.3 10% Coir 6.2 25.90 1.74 14.8:1 7.58 2.93 2 93 57.35 7.3 7.3107 5.0 5.0101

CT 1.4 15% Coir 6.2 33.93 1.81 18.7:1 8.04 3.03 3 03 50.03 7.7 7.7107 6.1 6.1101

Standard of Germany 6.06.0-7.0 > 15% 0.5% 1010-20:1 0.3% 0.5% 45% -

< 1000 MPN

Compostqualityinexperiment2 Compost quality in experiment 2

Parameter P Add of MO Mix pH Total C (%) Total N (%) C:N Ratio Total P (P2O5) (%) Total K (K2O) (%) Helpful Microorganism g (cfu/g) Coliform (cfu/g) CT 2 1 2.1 No 6.2 33.24 1.72 1 72 19.3:1 7.64 2.3 6.7 6.7105 2.3 2.3102 CT 2 2 2.2 Biosystem 6.35 32.18 1.87 1 87 17.2:1 8.37 2.98 8.03 8.03108 6.34 6.34101 CT 2 3 2.3 Biomix 6.20 35.06 1.75 1 75 19.9:1 8.28 2.87 8.3 8.3107 5.0 5.0101 CT 2 4 2.4 Trichoderma 6.20 39.9 1.76 1 76 22.7:1 8.76 2.91 7.2 7.2107 3.1 3.1102

Compostqualityinexperiment3 Compost quality in experiment 3

CT 3.1
Parameter P t
pH Total C (%) Total N (%) C:N ratio Total P (P2O5) (%) Total K (K2O) (%) Moisture (%) Helpful Microorganism (cfu/g) Coliform (cfu/g)

CT 3.2
Biomix Ricehusk 6.4 26.5 1.28 20.6:1 7.0 2.08 2 08 56.0 7.6 7.6107 Not found

CT 3.3
Biomix Water Ci. 6.3 33.0 2.09 15.7:1 8.5 2.25 2 25 59.2 6.8 6.8107 Not found

CT 3.4
Biomix Coir 6.2 31.2 1.67 18.7:1 8.04 1.81 1 81 57.0 7.2 7.2107 Not found

6.2 18.7 1.84 10.2:1 8.19 1.85 1 85 51.6 5.9 5.9106 1.6 1.6101

Standard of Germany 6.06.0-7.0 > 15% 0.5% 1010-20:1 0.3% 0.5% 45% -

< 1000 MPN

Compostqualityinexperiment3 Compost quality in experiment 3

CT 3.1 Parameter
p pH Total C (%) Total N (%) C:N ratio Total P (P2O5) (%) Total T t l K (K2O) (%) Moisture (%) Helpful Microorganism (cfu/g) Coliform (cfu/g)

CT 3.5 Biosystem Ricehusk 6.4 27.9 1.62 17.3:1 6.14 1.98 50.0 7107 Not found

CT 3.6 Biosystem Water Ci. 6.45 34.6 1.78 19.4:1 8.44 2.55 50.3 6.5 6.5107 Not found

CT 3.7 Biosystem Coir 6.45 31.3 1.60 19.5:1 8.13 2.85 53.4 6107 Not found

6.2 18.7 1.84 10.2:1 8.19 1.85 51.6 5.9 5.9106 1.6 1.6101

Standard of Germany 6.06.0-7.0 > 15% 0.5% 1010-20:1 0.3% 0.5% 0 5% 45% -

< 1000 MPN

CONCLUSIONS RubbersludgeisperfectlysuitedasaInput materialforcompostproduction Tooptimizethecompostingprocessofsludge carbonrichandstructuredmaterialsmustbe added:Coir(1015%),alsogivegoodresultssuch aswaterhyacinth(4%),ricehusk(5%) ComparedtothecompoststandardofGermany, compostfromrubbersludgehavehighercontent oforganicmatter,N,P,Ksignificantly

Further research
1. Examinationthesludgecomposton g growthofrubberplants p 2. Composthygienestandards Pathogenicbacteriologyand phytopathogens h t th 3. Developmentthemethodsfor measurementofmaturityandplant y p growthperformanceofcomposts