International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS)

Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: editor@ijettcs.org, editorijettcs@gmail.com Volume 1, Issue 2, July August 2012 ISSN 2278-6856

Analysis of Personalized Ontology & Emergence of Web Information Gathering

B. Nirupama1, Vijaya Lakshmi Kakulapati2
1,2

Department of Computer Science Engineering, Sridevi Womens College of Engineering, India

Abstract: Ontology is widely used to represent user profiles

as knowledge description personalized web information gathering. However the information of user profiles represents patterns either global or local knowledge base information, according to our analysis many models represents global knowledge. In this paper ontology system is used to recognize and reasoning over user profiles, world knowledge base and user instance repositories. This work also compares the analysis of existing system and ontology with other research areas is more efficient to represent

Keywords: Ontology, user profiles, Image processing, software Engineering

SECTION I
Introduction: Personalization of information access indeed to face considerable growth of data heterogeneity of the roles and needs to the rapid development of mobile system becomes important to propose a personalized system able to provide user with relevant information need. System must into account the different characteristics of the user and all contextual situations that influence his behavior during his interaction with information system. A generic model of profile access according to which the personalization system is articulated based mainly on profiles context users preferences. Profiles are knowledge containers context defines a set of parameters that characterize the environment of the system user preferences represent the expectations of the user. Ontology is best the candidate for representing knowledge about users to have a shared understanding between people or software agents of terms and their relations a controlled vocabulary. Ontologies have been proven and effective information means for modeling a user context can be very useful tool because they may present an overview of the domain related to a specific area of interest and used for browsing query refinement, provides rich semantics for humans to work with required formalism for computers to perform mechanical processing. Ontology is used to model the user profile has already been proposed in various applications like web search [3], [2] and personal information management [1]. However, up to this point, ontologies modeling user profiles are application-specific, with each one having been created specifically for a particular domain. Taking into account the continuing incorporation of ontologies in new applications, there is Volume 1, Issue 2 July-August 2012

an emerging need for a standard ontology that will model user profiles; this standard ontology will facilitate the communication between applications and serve as reference point when profiling functionalities need to be developed. Over the past decade growth of information available on the web gathering useful information from the web has become a challenging issue for users. Web users expect more intelligent systems to gather the useful information from the large size of web related data sources, user profiles represent the concept models possessed by users when gathering web information. A concept model is implicitly either local or global analysis method is effective for gathering the global knowledge. Multidimensional ontology mining method specificity for analyzing the concept specified machine-readable documents.

SECTION II
2. Survey on Ontology: Ontology is a extraction and a subtask of information extraction is a type of information retrieval is automatically extract structured information from unstructured relevant concepts and relations from a given data sets from ontology. It retrieves data based on the local or global does not consider on the primary key gathers data based on the user name in local profile if two persons have same name it will retrieve both the information. For capturing the user information needs user profiles were used in web information gathering, user profile is a collection of data associated to a specific personal data associated to a specific user. A profile refers to the explicit digital representation of a persons identity can also consider as the computer representation of a user model. User profiles are categorized into interviewing semi-interviewing non-interviewing, interviewing profiles are considered perfect for user profiles they are acquired by using manual techniques such as questionnaries interviewing users and analyzing use classified training sets. Users read each document and gave a positive or negative advice to the document against a given topic semi-interviewing use profiles are acquired by semiautomated techniques with limited user involvement usually provides users with a list of categories and ask user for interesting categories example is the web training set acquisition model introduced by Tao et al which extracts training sets from the web based on user feedback categories. Non interviewing techniques do not involve Page 225

International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS)

Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: editor@ijettcs.org, editorijettcs@gmail.com Volume 1, Issue 2, July August 2012 ISSN 2278-6856
users at all but ascertain user interests instead acquire user profiles by observing user activity and behavior. 3.3.Ontology in Software Engineering:Modelling ontology is a tedious task always important to demonstrate can gain by applying ontologies in software engineering, the current advent of logic based formalisms in the context of the semantic web effort is an important factor. Activities by the W3C and others have helped to flesh out standards like RDF or OWL receive increasing attention by tool builders and users. Important factor is the flexibility of ontologies with information integration as a major use case, ontologies are well to combine information from various sources and infer new factors and also the flexibility. Further promoted by the"web"focus of current ontology approaches due to the fact that software systems also get increasingly web-enabled and must thuscope with data from heterogeneous sources that may not be known at developmenttime, software engineers seek technologies that can help in this situation. Thus,experts in the field like Grady Booch are expecting semantic web technology to beone of the next big things in the architecture of web-based applications [40]. Also, theweb makes it easier to share knowledge. Having URIs as globally unique identifiers,it is easy to relate ones ontology to someone else's conceptualization. This in turnencourages interoperability and reuse.Regarding more Software Engineering-specific advantages, ontologies makedomain models first order citizens. While domain models are clearly driving the coreof every software system, their importance in current Software Engineering processesdecreases after the analysis phase. The core purpose of ontologies is by definition theformal descriptions of a domain and thus encourages a broader usage throughout thewhole Software Engineering lifecycle.

SECTION III
3.1. Interaction Between Semantic web and Ontology: Semantic web mining aims to combine the development of semantic web and web mining, web mining extracts information from the content of the pages its structure of relationships and users browsing records. Very important portion of semantic web is the ontologies represented as a set of concepts and their relevant interrelations for certain domains of knowledge Sentiment analysis is opinion mining is responsible for classifying words, texts or documents of opinion and works in tagging and their components which indicate if the expression is positive negative or neutral and in the field of the subjectivity of texts as well. Web intelligence is research aimed at exploration of the fundamental interactions between artificial intelligence advanced engineering and information technology is a general term referring to new area example such as informatics of the brain, IA human level and classics such as engineering knowledge representation planning discovery data extraction. 3.2. Image processing Ontology: Ontology widely used for designing high level scene interpretation that provides the primitives and the concepts at the physical level correspond to the effects of the acquisition components on the digital image representation analysis of the various components of a standard acquisition system lighting environment optical system sensor analog to digital converter and storage gives the list of their possible effects example such as sensor optical system can generate illumination geometry and blur defects on images.

SECTION IV
4.1. Knowledge base:The world knowledge base must cover an exhaustive range of topics, since users may come from different backgrounds. The structure of the world knowledge base used in this research is encoded from the LCSH references. The LCSH system contains three types of references: 1. Broader term- The BT references are for two subjects describing the same topic, but at different levels of abstraction (or specificity). In our model, they are encoded as the is-a relations in the world knowledge base. 2. Used-for- The UF references in the LCSH are used for many semantic situations, including broadening the semantic extent of a subject and describing compound subjects and subjects subdivided by other topics. When object A is used for an action, becomes a part of that action (e.g., a fork is used for dining); when A is used for another object, B, A becomes a part of B (e.g., a wheel is used for a car). These cases can be encoded as the part-of relations. 3. Related term- The RT references are for two subjects related in some manner other than by hierarchy. Page 226

Figure shows the effects generated on image representation by various components of a standard image acquisition system provides the physical level of the ontology.

Image retrieval results identifies the nine categories of concepts blur, noise, colorimetry, illumination, geometry, photometry, sampling,quantization and storage only primitives that have a genuine manifestation in the input images should be provided. Volume 1, Issue 2 July-August 2012

International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS)

Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: editor@ijettcs.org, editorijettcs@gmail.com Volume 1, Issue 2, July August 2012 ISSN 2278-6856
They are encoded as the related-to relations in our world knowledge base. 4.2. Ontology Learning Environment: The subjects of user interest are extracted from the WKB via user interaction. A tool called Ontology Learning Environment (OLE) is developed to assist users with such interaction. Regarding a topic, the interesting subjects consist of two sets: positive subjects are the concepts relevant to the information need, and negative subjects are the concepts resolving paradoxical or ambiguous interpretation of the information need. Thus, for a given topic, the OLE provides users with a set of candidates to identify positive and negative subjects. These candidate subjects are extracted from the WKB. Who are not fed back as either positive or negative from the user, become the neutral subjects to the given topic. 4.3. Ontology mining: Ontology mining discovers interesting and on-topic knowledge from the concepts, semantic relations, and instances in ontology. Ontology mining method is introduced: Specificity and Exhaustively. Specificity (denoted spe) describes a subjects focus on a given topic. Exhaustively (denoted exh) restricts a subjects semantic space dealing with the topic. This method aims to investigate the subjects and the strength of their associations in ontology. In User Local Instance Repository, User background knowledge can be discovered from user local information collections, such as a users stored documents, browsed web pages, and composed/received emails. Algorithm to be applied is given below fact that only users know their interests and preferences perfectly. Baseline Model demonstrated the noninterviewing user profiles, a users interests and preferences are described by a set of weighted subjects learned from the users browsing history. These subjects are specified with the semantic relations of superclass and subclass in ontology. When an OBIWAN agent receives the search results for a given topic, it filters and re-ranks the results based on their semantic similarity with the subjects. The similar documents are awarded and reranked higher on the result list. Web modelwas the implementation of typical semi interviewing user profiles. It acquired user profiles from the web by employing a web search engine. The feature terms referred to the interesting concepts of the topic. The noisy terms referred to the paradoxical or ambiguous concepts with disadvantages such as the using web documents for training sets has one severe drawback: web information has much noise and uncertainties. As a result, the web user profiles were satisfactory in terms of recall, but weak in terms of precision. There was no negative training set generated by this model compare to this, world knowledge and a users local instance repository (LIR) are used in the proposed model. An LIR is a users personal collection of information items. From a world knowledge base, we construct personalized ontologies by adopting user feedback on interesting knowledge. A multidimensional ontology mining method, Specificity and Exhaustively, is also introduced in the proposed model for analyzing concepts specified in ontologies. The users LIRs are then used to discover background knowledge and to populate the personalized ontologies. Proposed analysis have benefits Compared with the TREC model, the Ontology model had better recall but relatively weaker precision performance. The Ontology model discovered user background knowledge from user local instance repositories, rather than documents read and judged by users. Thus, the Ontology user profiles were not as precise as the TREC user profiles.The Ontology profiles had broad topic coverage. The substantial coverage of possibly-related topics was gained from the use of the WKB and the large number of training documents. Compared to the web data used by the web model, the LIRs used by the Ontology model were controlled and contained less uncertainties. Additionally, a large number of uncertainties were eliminated when user background knowledge was discovered. As a result, the user profiles acquired by the Ontology model performed better than the web model.

SECTION V
5. Comparative Study:The TREC model was used to demonstrate the interviewing user profiles, which reflected user concept models perfectly. For each topic, TREC users were given a set of documents to read and judged each as relevant or non-relevant to the topic. The TREC user profiles perfectly reflected the users personal interests, as the relevant judgments were provided by the same people who created the topics as well, following the Volume 1, Issue 2 July-August 2012

SECTION VI
6. CONCLUSION The proposed ontology system provides a solution to emphasizing global or local knowledge in a computational model and applied to the design of web information gathering systems. The model also has extensive contributions to thefields of Information Page 227

International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS)

Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: editor@ijettcs.org, editorijettcs@gmail.com Volume 1, Issue 2, July August 2012 ISSN 2278-6856
Retrieval, web Intelligence, RecommendationSystems, and Information Systems and reviews the ontology with software engineering, image processing retrieval compares with previous model. Our work extends, will investigate the methods thatgenerate user local instance repositories to match therepresentation of a global knowledge base. The presentwork assumes that all user local instance repositories havecontent-based descriptors referring to the subjects, however,a large volume of documents existing on the web maynot have such contentbased descriptors.

B.Nirupama pursuing M.Tech Computer Science Engineering from Sridevi Womens college of Engineering B.Tech Information Technolgy from JayaPrakesh Narayana College of Engineering. Her research areas include Data mining Cloud Computing. Vijayalakshmi Kakulapati Ph.D M.Tech currently she is the Head of the Deaprtment of Computer Science Engineering and having 20years of Academic Experience. Her research areas includes Information Retrieval Systems, Web Mining, Operating Systems, Unix Administration, attended National Conference and published more than 15 International Journals and life member of various technical bodies like IEEE ACM CSI ISTE.

REFERENCE
[1] V. Katifori,, A. Poggi,. M. Scannapieco, T. Catarci, & Y. Ioannidis (2005). OntoPIM: how to rely on a personal ontology for Personal Information Management. In Proc. of the 1st Workshop on The Semantic Desktop. [2] S. Lawrence, (2000). Context in web search. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 23(3):25-32 [3] J. Trajkova, S. Gauch, Improving Ontology-based User Profiles, Proc. of RIAO 2004, University of Avignon (Vaucluse), France, April 26-28, 2004, pp. 380-389 [4] Amato G., Staraccia U., User profile modellin and applications to digital libraries, Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Research and avanced technology for digital libraries, p. 184-187, 1999. [5] Bouzeghoub M., Kostadinov D., Lart et dfinition dun modle flexible de profils, Actes de la 2me confrence en personnalisation de linformation : aperu de ltat de recherche dinformations et applications CORIA2005, Grenoble, France, 2005 [6] C. Hudelot, N. Maillot, and M. Thonnat. Symbol Grounding for Semantic Image Interpretation: From Image Data to Semantics. In IEEE Int. Workshop on Semantic Knowledge in Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 18, Beijing, China, 2005. [7] J. Hunter. Adding Multimedia to the Semantic Web Building an MPEG-7 Ontology. In Int. Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS), pages 261281, Stanford, CA, 2001. [8] Oberle, D.: Semantic Management of Middleware, Volume I of The Semantic Web and Beyond Springer, New York (2006) [9] Mayank, V., Kositsyna, N., Austin, M.: Requirements Engineering and the Semantic Web, Part II. Representation, Management, and Validation of Requirements and System-Level Architectures. Technical Report. TR 2004-14, University of Maryland (2004) [10] Decker, B., Rech, J., Ras, E., Klein, B., Hoecht, C.: Selforganized Reuse of SoftwareEngineering Knowledge supported by Semantic Wikis. In: Proc. of Workshop on SemanticWeb Enabled Software Engineering (SWESE). November (2005) Volume 1, Issue 2 July-August 2012

Page 228