Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thomas A. Lamb 2806 Howe Place #1 Anchorage, Alaska 99517 E-mail: tlamb775@aol.com Telephone: 907-306-5855
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3AN-12- 09961 CI ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
Mitt Romney,
13
Defendants
14 15
Plaintiff Thomas A. Lamb, pro se, pursuant to Alaska Civil Rule 77 (k) moves this court
17 18 19 20
to reconsider its order dated October15th, 2012 denying Plaintiffs motion for expedited consideration of the Plaintiffs Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. This motion is supported by Plaintiffs affidavit in Support of Motion for Reconsideration for Expedited Consideration.
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated this ____ day of October, 2012 ____________________ ____________________ Thomas A. Lamb
Lawsuit RomneyObama- 1
1 2 3 4 5 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that on this 16th day of October, 2012 I caused a copy of the foregoing to be served by certified First Class mail to the following parties known address: Obama for America P.O. Box 803638 Chicago, Il 60680 Romney for President P.O. Box 149756 Boston, Ma 02114-9756
________________________________
7
Thomas A. Lamb
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Lawsuit RomneyObama- 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Thomas A. Lamb 2806 Howe Place #1 Anchorage, Alaska 99517 E-mail: tlamb775@aol.com Telephone: 907-306-5855
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3AN-12- 09961 CI ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
Mitt Romney,
13
Defendants
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
AFFIDAVIT OF THOMAS A. LAMB IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION
Thomas A. Lamb, pro se, duly sworn, deposes and states: 1. 2. I am the Plaintiff in the above captioned case. On September 26th, 2012, I sent a summons and complaint of the above
captioned case via certified First Class Mail to the Defendants listed P.O. Box. 3. On October 9th, 2012, I received the certified receipt that the Obama
campaign picked up the above captioned complaint and summons on October 4th, 2012. I received a returned mailing of the complaint that was sent to the Romney campaign also on October 9th, 2010. The reason for delivery was no such number. See Exhibit A
Lawsuit RomneyObama- 3
1 2 3 4 5
4.
A call was made to the Romney campaign notifying them that a complaint
was sent and returned. I left my contact phone number. No return call has been made to me since October 16th, 2012. 5. campaign. As of October 16th, I have not received a response from the Obama
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
6.
On October 11th, 2012, I mailed First Class certified mail a Motion For
Expedited Consideration, a proposed Court order with the motion, an Affidavit Supporting the Motion For Expedited Consideration which indicated that a summons and complaint was sent to the Defendants on September 26th, 2012 and Defendant Barack Obama received the summons and complaint on October 4th, 2012 and the summons and complaint sent to Defendant Mitt Romney was returned and both had not responded, another copy of the summons and complaint to the Defendant Mitt Romney; a Memorandum In Support of Motion For Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, a Motion For Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Romney, and a proposed Court order supporting the Plaintiffs position. See Exhibit A.
Thomas A. Lamb
Lawsuit RomneyObama- 4
1 2 3
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3AN-12- 09961 CI ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Plaintiff,
6
vs.
7
Mitt Romney,
9
Defendants
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED that the expedited consideration of the Motion For Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney is GRANTED. Any opposition to the motion is due .
Date
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Lawsuit RomneyObama- 5
1 2 3
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3AN-12- 09961 CI ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Plaintiff,
6
vs.
7
Mitt Romney,
9
Defendants
10 11
Thomas A. Lamb, Plaintiff moves this court to reconsider its order issued on October
15 16
15th, 2012 denying the Plaintiffs motion for expedited consideration. (See http://www.courtrecords.alaska.gov/eservices/casedetail.page.5?x=1zagxqekJFmI14qduR9cQdP
17
BpwOS5-9h7byB6*D024c)
18
According to Civil Rule 4(e) and 5(f) and the Plaintiff provided the court with proof of
19
service of the summons and complaint via the affidavit in support of the Motion For Expedited
20
Consideration.
21
To ensure that this Court is not misperceiving the proof of service of the pleadings in this
22 23
case, Exhibit A has been submitted with the Plaintiffs affidavit and this memorandum and motion.
24
Time has become a factor in this case and the time line from the demand letter, the filing
25
of the complaint after the nominating process for the Democratic and Republican presidential
26 27 28
candidates, the defendants can respond to the complaint within 20 days after the Defendants receive the complaint.
Lawsuit RomneyObama- 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Defendant Barack Obama received the complaint on October 4th 2012. That would allow the Defendant to respond by November 1st 2012. As for the Defendant Mitt Romney, accordingly the summons and complaint had to be sent again via what amounts to be the pony express from Alaska to the Lower 48. The general election is on November 6th, 2012 which does not allow for a timely appeal or response to an order to produce the records and allow the public to view and digest the information. The Plaintiff has put his trust in the process but to no avail, the Defendants have ignored the requests or are using the allowable time in hope that time will run out rendering this case moot. The importance of this case is justified by new revelations as mentioned in the Plaintiffs pleadings that pointed to Obamas Organizing for America aiding in voter fraud; the director who engaged in the act was fired. (See http://www.click2houston.com/news/DNC-workeraccused-of-telling-people-how-to-vote-twice/-/1735978/16969646/-/ofwihsz/-/index.html) And the revelation that Barack Obama may have committed fraud by claiming to be a foreign student. In a published story from PBS about an interview done on June 27, 2012, an old school mate of Barack Obama tells of how Barry told students that he would be going back to Indonesia where his family lived. (See http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/governmentelections-politics/choice-2012/the-frontline-interview-kristen-caldwell/) This case is one of a serious matter and questions need to be answered through this court. In fairness, the Defendants should answer the motion on producing records by the 26th of October, 2012. A corrected copy of page 1 of the Plaintiffs Memorandum in Support of Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney has been sent with this new round of motion practice.
Lawsuit RomneyObama- 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
CONCLUSION Accordingly this court can grant the order for an expedited consideration. Dated this ____ day of October, 2012 ____________________ ____________________ Thomas A. Lamb
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that on this 16th day of October, 2012 I caused a copy of the foregoing to be served by certified First Class mail to the following parties known address: Obama for America P.O. Box 803638 Chicago, Il 60680 Romney for President P.O. Box 149756 Boston, Ma 02114-9756
________________________________
19
Thomas A. Lamb
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Lawsuit RomneyObama- 8