57 views

Uploaded by Sai Sandeep

- Llb
- 101294773-Training-Report-in-220-Kv-Sub-Station-of-Dtl.pdf
- Need of This Project
- EC GATE2016 31st Jan'16 Afternoon Session
- BHEL Project Report
- Amish tripathi
- LED-Dot-Matrix-Display
- Gate ECE Previous Year Papers
- Training Report on Substation
- CFOA_AD844.pdf
- solved problems in electric motors
- Bhel Project Report Cj
- Electric Machinery 6Ed Fitzgerald_ Kingsley_ Uman - C2
- nptel
- Control Systems-syllabus
- 1001 Solved Problems in Electrical Engineering, Part 4
- VI Sem ECE Assignments
- Sandeep Maheshwari E-Book
- 2. MATCHED FILTER
- Gate Plan (ECE).pdf

You are on page 1of 9

Lesson 20

Matched Filter

Principle of matched filter (MF); Properties of a matched filter; SNR maximization and minimization of average symbol error probability; Schwartzs Inequality; Certain structural modification and simplifications of the correlation receiver are possible by observing that, (a) All orthonormal basis functions j s are defined between 0 t Tb and they are zero outside this range . (b) Analog multiplication, which is not always very simple and accurate to implement, of the received signal r(t) with time limited basis functions may be replaced by some filtering operation. Let, h j (t ) represent the impulse response of a linear filter to which r(t) is applied. Then, the filter output y j (t ) may be expressed as:

y j (t ) = r ( ) h j (t )d

Now, let, h j (t ) = j (T t ), a time reversed and time-shifted version of j (t ) .

4.20.1

Now, y j (t ) =

r ( ). j [T (t )]d

r ( ). j (T + t )d

4.20.2

y j (T ) =

Let us recall that j (t ) is zero outside the interval 0 t T . Using this, the above equation may be expressed as, y j (T ) = r ( ) j ( )d

0 T

( ). j ( )d

4.20.3

0 T

4.20.4

The important expression of (Eq.4.20.4) tells us that the j th correlation output can equivalently be obtained by using a filter with h j (t ) = j (T t ) and sampling its output at t = T.

The filter is said to be matched to the orthonormal basis function j (t ) and the alternation receiver structure is known as a matched filter receiver. The detector part of the matched filter receiver is shown in [Fig.4.20.1].

0 (t) 0

2T

0 (t) h (t)

t

t=T Filter h1 (t ) = 1 (T t )

r1

h2 (t ) = 2 (T t )

r2

Observation vector r

r (t ) rN

hN (t ) = N (T t )

Matched filters

Sample at t = T

Fig. 4.20.1: The block diagram of a matched filter bank that is equivalent to a Correlation Detector A physically realizable matched filter is to be causal and h j (t ) = 0 for t < 0. Note that if j (t ) is zero outside 0 t T , h j (t ) = j (T t ) is a causal impulse response.

We note that a filter which is matched to a known signal (t ), 0 t T , is characterized by an impulse response h(t) which is a time reversed and delayed version of (t ) i.e. 4.20.5 h(t ) = (T t )

In the frequency domain, the matched filter is characterized (without mach explanation at this point), by a transfer function, which is, except for a delay factor, the complex conjugate of the F.T. of (t ) , i.e. ( f ) = ( f ) exp( j 2 fT ) 4.20.6

Property (1) : The spectrum of the output signal of a matched filter with the matched signal as input is, except for a time delay factor, proportional to the energy spectral density of the input signal. Let, 0 ( f ) denote the F.T. of the filter of output 0 (t ) . Then, 0 ( f ) = ( f ) ( f )

= ( f )( f ) exp( j 2 fT )

= ( f )

2

exp( j 2 fT )

4.20.7

Property (2): The output signal of a matched filter is proportional to a shifted version of the autocorrelation function of the in the input signal to which the filter is matched. This property follows from Property (1). As the auto-correlation function and the energy spectral density form F.T. pair, by taking IFT of (Eq.4.20.7), we may write, 4.20.8 0 (t ) = R (t T )

R (0) = 0 (t ) = Energy of (t ).

4.20.9

Property (3): The output SNR of a matched filter depends only on the ratio of the signal energy to the psd of the white noise at the filter input.

Let us consider a filter matched to the input signal (t ) . From property (2), we see that the maximum value of 0 (t ) at t = T is 0 (t T ) = E . Now, it may be shown that the average noise power at the output of the matched N N0 2 2 filter is given by, E[n (t )] = 4.20.10 ( f ) df = 20 .E 2 The maximum signal power = 0 (T ) = E 2 .

E2 2E ( SNR ) max = = N0 E N0 2 Note that SNR in the above expression is a dimensionless quantity.

2

Hence,

4.20.11

This is a very significant result as we see that the SNRmax depends on E and N0 but not on the shape of (t ) . This means a freedom to the designer to select specific pulse shape to

optimize other design requirement (the most usual requirement being the spectrum or, equivalently, the transmission bandwidth) while ensuring same SNR.

Property (4): The matched-filtering operation may be separated into two matching condition: namely, spectral phase matching that produces the desired output peak at t = T and spectral amplitude matching that gives the peak value its optimum SNR. ( f ) = ( f ) exp[ j ( f )] 4.20.12

The filter is said to be matched to the signal (t ) in spectral phase if the transfer function of the filter follows: ( f ) = ( f ) exp[ j ( f ) j 2 fT ] 4.20.13 Here ( f ) is real non-negative and T is a positive constant. The output of such a filter is,

0 (t ) =

'

( f ) ( f ) .exp[ j 2 f (t T )df

Note that, (t ) (t ) is real and non-negative. Spectral phase matching ensures that all spectral components of 0 ' (t ) add constructively at t = T and thus cause maximum value of the output:

0 (T ) =

'

( f ) ( f ) df . 0 ' (t )

4.20.14

For spectral amplitude matching, we choose the amplitude response ( f ) of the filter to shape the output for best SNR at t = T by using ( f ) = ( f ) . The standard matched filter achieves both these features.

Let, h(t) be the impulse response of a linear filter and x(t ) = (t ) + (t ), 0 t T : is the input to the filter where (t ) is a known signal and (t ) is an additive white noise sample function with zero mean and psd of (N0/2) Watt/Hz. Let, (t ) be one of the orthonormal basis functions. As the filter is linear, its output can be expressed as, y(t) = 0(t) + n(t), where 0(t) is the output due to the signal component (t) and n(t) is the output due to the noise component (t).[Fig. 4.20.2].

(t )

+ +

(t )

White noise

h(t)

y(t)

Sample at t = T

Fig. 4.20.2: A matched filter is fed with a noisy basis function to which it is matched

We can now re-frame the requirement of minimum probability of error (or maximum likelihood detection) as: The filter should make power of 0 (t ) considerably greater (in fact, as large as possible) compared to the power of n(t) at t = T. That is, the filter should maximize the output signal-to-noise power ratio [(SNR)0] 2 0 (T ) max E[n 2 (t )] The following discussion shows that the SNR is indeed maximized when h(t) is matched to the known input signal (t ) . Let,

( f ) : F.T. of known signal (t ) ( f ) : Transfer function of the linear filter. 0 ( f ) = ( f ) ( f )

and

0 (t ) =

( f )( f ) exp( j 2 ft )df

2

4.20.15

0 (T ) =

( f )( f ) exp( j 2 fT )df

4.20.16

Let, SN(f) : Power spectral density of noise at the output of the linear filter. So, N 2 S N ( f ) = 0 . ( f ) 2 Now, the average noise power at the output of the filter

4.20.17

= E[n 2 (t )] =

S N ( f )df

N = 0 2

( f ) df

2

4.20.18

Form Eq. 4.20.16 and 4.20.18, we can write an expression of the output SNR as:

( SNR )0 =

2 (T )

2

E[n (t )]

( f ). ( f ) exp( j 2 fT )df

N0 2

4.20.19 ( f ) df

2

Our aim now is to find a suitable form of H(f) such that (SNR)0 is maximized. We use Schwarzs inequality for the purpose.

Schwarzs Inequality

Let x(t ) and y (t ) denote any pair of complex-valued signals with finite energy, i.e.

x(t ) y (t )dt

4.20.20

The equality holds if and only if y (t ) = k .x (t ), where k is a scalar constant. This implies, y (t ) x(t ) = k .x(t ) x (t ) a real quantity. Now, applying Schwarzs inequality on the numerator of (Eq.4.20.19), we may write,

2

( f )( f ) exp( j 2 fT )df

( f ) df

( f ) df

4.20.21

2 ( SNR )0 N0

( f ) df

4.20.22

Now, from Schwarzs inequality, the SNR is maximum i.e. the equality holds, when opt ( f ) = ( f ).exp( j 2 fT ). [Assuming k = 1, a scalar)

We see, hopt (t ) =

( f ) exp[ j 2 (T t )]df

4.20.23

4.20.24

hopt (t ) =

= (T t )

hopt (t ) = (T t )

This relation is the same as we obtained previously for a matched filter receiver. So, we can infer that, SNR maximization is an operation, which is equivalent to minimization of average symbol error (Pe) for an AWGN Channel.

Example #4.20.1: Let us consider a sinusoid, defined below as the basis function:

t 0t T T cos wct. t 0 ( t ) = 2 cos wc t. T t 2T T 0 else.

Problems

Q4.20.1) Under what conditions matched filter may be considered equivalent to an optimum correlation receiver? Q4.20.2) Is a matched filter equivalent to an optimum correlation receiver if sampling is not possible at the right instants of time? Q4.20.3) Explain the significance of the fact that a matched filter ensures maximum output signal-to-noise ratio.

- LlbUploaded bysdiv92
- 101294773-Training-Report-in-220-Kv-Sub-Station-of-Dtl.pdfUploaded byMunish Gaur
- Need of This ProjectUploaded byThomas Baker
- EC GATE2016 31st Jan'16 Afternoon SessionUploaded byRavi Raj
- BHEL Project ReportUploaded byVKM2013
- Amish tripathiUploaded byamber19995
- LED-Dot-Matrix-DisplayUploaded byapi-19668076
- Gate ECE Previous Year PapersUploaded bynaveenbabu19
- Training Report on SubstationUploaded byAbhishek Dave
- CFOA_AD844.pdfUploaded byfullstop1027_4915190
- solved problems in electric motorsUploaded bysumithra
- Bhel Project Report CjUploaded byChandrajeet Singh
- Electric Machinery 6Ed Fitzgerald_ Kingsley_ Uman - C2Uploaded byபிரசன்னகுமார் ஆனந்தன்
- nptelUploaded byHarpreet Singh Bedi
- Control Systems-syllabusUploaded byeeenct22
- 1001 Solved Problems in Electrical Engineering, Part 4Uploaded byKim Patrick Jaro Guevarra
- VI Sem ECE AssignmentsUploaded byManoj Varma
- Sandeep Maheshwari E-BookUploaded byPrasoon Goel
- 2. MATCHED FILTERUploaded byTaha
- Gate Plan (ECE).pdfUploaded bylavsvnit
- 10.1.1.300.2539.pdfUploaded byAbdulbasitHamza
- Analysis of Finite Wordlength EffectsUploaded bykrajasekarantuti
- chapter11.pdfUploaded bykannan1045
- OutageUploaded byKuldeep Kumar
- Generator Capability CurveUploaded byarputharaju_k
- Analysis of ECG Signal by Polynomial ApproximationUploaded byEditor IJRITCC
- AnalysisWMFilters PranamUploaded bybovonto
- ECR2013_C-1658Uploaded byPero Kvržica
- summer training report on unnao sub stationUploaded byShailendra Yadav

- HelloUploaded bySai Sandeep
- Branch PredictorUploaded bySai Sandeep
- Cormen Sol set 5Uploaded bySai Sandeep
- Hello WorldUploaded bySai Sandeep
- Hello WorldUploaded bySai Sandeep
- Reading MaterialUploaded bySai Sandeep
- Midterm 2011Uploaded bySai Sandeep
- verilog--solnUploaded bygannoju423
- chapter-3 op ampUploaded bymubs73
- Binary TreesUploaded byblack Snow
- flip flopUploaded byNeryo Condori Q
- flip flopUploaded byNeryo Condori Q
- Gruber's Complete GRE Guide 2012Uploaded bynaveen_m01
- Linked List BasicsUploaded bygbland
- Verilog Chap 4Uploaded bySai Sandeep

- 12_Importing_Shipment_Data_KeyUploaded byKévin Delarue
- Nintendo- Game Boy ColorUploaded byJohn Raj Peresath
- Photoshop Tips and ShortcutsUploaded byGabriel
- NetScaler_Exchange2010Uploaded byacerking
- ocpjp 6 free mock exam practice questionsUploaded byapi-255260651
- Ahmed_Abubaker_CV.pdfUploaded byAhmed AbuBaker
- Objects First Bluej PDFUploaded byAngela
- Project Management AssignmentUploaded byRabia Kazmi
- Well ArchitectUploaded bySandesh Chavan
- Littelfuse_TVS_Diode_Catalog.pdfUploaded byjesus
- Building an Image Processing Pipeline With PythonUploaded byyamabushi
- Nasa AviationUploaded byRaj Mukherjee
- Is a GrafUploaded byTaty Anny Fonseca
- Tally and GSTUploaded byKannan S
- 43i9-Acoustic Echo CancellationUploaded byIJAET Journal
- PresentationUploaded byRobertH[AU]
- Wii Backup Manager - CompleteSoftmodGuideUploaded byDocMaster
- DESIGN OF RESIDUE-TO-BINARY CONVERTER FOR A NEW 5-MODULI SUPERSET RESIDUE NUMBER SYSTEMUploaded bysankarjishnu_2028573
- Configuring a Wireless RoutersUploaded byRaj
- lecture06-standards.pdfUploaded bysamtec32
- Attachment 3 - Checklist of Handover IssueUploaded byFurqan Ahmad
- PhysRevX.6.031007Uploaded bySuryaMohan
- BPP of Goods Receipt MIS-MMMUploaded bymeddebyounes
- Baseline Hydraulic Wrist and Forearm Dynamometer User ManualUploaded byphcproducts
- DSSUploaded byAman Khalid
- BME 461 ManualUploaded byMohmmad P.Alshorman
- User ManualUploaded bybkit_n_hai
- Datasheet 74ls74Uploaded byminhquyen_130689
- JCGM_100_201X_CDUploaded byfitri puspa
- July 2010Uploaded byKatrena Patterson Blackson