note goran rudling has assisted the 4corners naming and blaming the victims show and doesnt

see why this is ethically wrong. he writes today: I think you should know me by now. I do not have any pictures of the women involved. If I had I would never have handed them over. Period. I took some pictures of buildings in Stockholm that were needed for the documentary. todays mess: From: mary rose lenore eng <maryeng1@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:10 PM Subject: Fwd: Naming and Picturing Rape Victims to Tar and Feather them To: Objectivisor McFact <amiobjective@gmail.com>, anderson@mail.law.cuny.edu, claes.borgstrom@advbyra.se, brenda.auterman@usdoj.gov

relevant Assange Case and the need for Internationalized Rape Shield i find it fascinating that two out of three assange's Swedish "experts" support naming of victims see also brita sundberg support for cyberbullying by rixstep http://braingarbagedystopie.blogspot.com/2012/11/goran-rudling-rape-victim-bashing-for.html redacted version: Mary, I think you should know me by now. I do not have any pictures of the women involved. If I had I would never have handed them over. Period. I took some pictures of buildings in Stockholm that were needed for the documentary. Firstly. I still think Rape Victim X is Q. I've spent long time looking over the evidence and there is no other conclusion to be drawn. Secondly Rape Victim X is a public figure. She was a candidate for Kommunfullmktige. Regarding Rape Victim Y's name. I do not think it makes any difference if her name is on my blog or not. It is not the name in itself that makes the difference. It is what is said in connection to the name. If you have found anything that you think should not appear on my blog tell me and I will look into it. You are not a rape victim for reporting a crime. You are a victim if you are raped whether or not the crime is reported and whether or not the offender is convicted.

Gran and a while back. note he calls me Babe even though i have told him this makes me uncomfortable way back in February. From: Gran Rudling <goran.rudling@samtycke.nu> Date: Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:59 PM Subject: A Rose is a Rose is a Rose is a Mary Lenore To: mary rose lenore eng <maryeng1@gmail.com>

I will do what I can to get the really stupid people here like Jen. It takes longer than I think. But I will get there. What I want you to do is do not in any shape or form tell anyone of our conversations. DO NOT PUBLISH MY EMAILS WITHOUT ASKING ME FIRST. Remember I am on your side. I was before we even met. I just didn't know it. In order to be effective I need info on Australia rape shield law. And UK rape shield law. If you have it, send it. If you don't look for someone that might know. I still remember the Swedish chef talk. I am writing a post of the puppet show on balconies. Christine is a puppet show Fhrer. I have this pix that along with Julian's pix on balcony will be great. I want to write a Mad Magazine piece. We'll get there Baby. Bear with me.

mary rose lenore eng skrev 2012-09-15 05:44: feel free to leak this or publish or share mix and distort! On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:43 PM, mary rose lenore eng <maryeng1@gmail.com> wrote: most horrifying of late: her inclusion on 4corners australia documentary which names photographs and blames the victim. she began to attack a victim, and i turned it off. infuriating. there rape shield law in australia and she should be disbarred for assisting criminal stalking and retaliation against the victims.

assange of course prototed this show. most notable: absence she acts like rape is not a big issue in international llaw. she ignores it. one day she finally tweeted about vatican catholic child rapist priests. i tweeted back---nice to see you tweeting against rape. she is gagged from a huge aspect of international rape law pertaing to rwanda and well covered by women under siege the new non-profit. the canberra document section 21 is very fallacious to attack the rape victims behavior as fabricated character damage to indicate they were not rape. it shows an immature look at the law and the study of victim behavior. shock is very common and coverring up for the criminal especially when social and professional demands weigh in. ill think more about it. when assange tweeted "Never censor child Porn" i quizzed everyone and wrote smthng like "suigenerisjen is not stupid enough to promote assange's pro-child porn theories during the rape case" and also when assange was promoting his character attacks on th girls in the swedish sex book i noticed' suigenerisjen is not promoting the redefining rape as free love book for assange. it was critical to me, she is gagged, she rape shield violates, but there are certain extremely stupid things assange does that she will not duplicate. i believe she is trying to distance herself---though as blocked---i dont see her tweets so much anymore. so it works like this too: she is pro-censorship. the neonazi issue on SVA may be part of why she blocked me too.

or my mad letters. here is her getting trapped in

http://www.scribd.com/doc/88424796/honor-killing-theory-via-phyllis-chesler-moving-beyondthe-wikileaks-scene-honor-killing-theory http://braingarbagedystopie.blogspot.com/2012/04/honor-killings-theory-via-phyllis.html shall i ask objectiviser---or the committee???? i have been defending jen against being called "babe" lawyer by PGPBoard who doesnt seem to get why this is sexist or harassing and condescending. better to keep it intellectual. also since i am against sexism and sexual harassment---it is awful to destroy credibility by stooping to that level altho PGPB makes many good points otherwise. she and jules walked arm in arm dec 5 at westminster hall after the debate. which was a little too much info for me---but they are possibly good friends or whatever. if i were them---i would be careful in public about crossing the romantic-professional line esp in public observed by braingarbage. sarah harrison was supposedly assange's girlfriend b4 he went to sweden---and she took him back after the mess. he was very disrespectful to her july 2 at the troxy with zizek. article PT FAIL pomo bogan or smthng.

will think hard on it. good luck. smthngs brewing On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Gran Rudling <goran.rudling@samtycke.nu> wrote: Hey there Rose is a Rose, Looking at doing something on Jennifer. The Canberra statement. Do you have any material where you think Jen has been silly or used twisted logic, lies? If so I'd like to see. Home at last for some sleep Gran

mary rose lenore eng skrev 2012-09-15 01:37: http://braingarbagedystopie.blogspot.com/2012/09/comment-for-wikiwatchorguk.html wrote this same old boring story for wikiwatch.co.uk

they think highly of you and speak of you on twitter a lot. they are very good.

great article. sent thru twitter. On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Gran Rudling <goran.rudling@samtycke.nu> wrote: New one on newsmill. Naomi stuff. Your quote is in there -Skickat frn min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Urskta min fordighet. mary rose lenore eng <maryeng1@gmail.com> skrev: so good newsmill funny too---wall of lies!