Journal of Global Marketing, 24:5868, 2011 Copyright c Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0891-1762 print / 1528-6975

online DOI: 10.1080/08911762.2011.545720

The Effects of Corporate-Brand Credibility, Perceived Corporate-Brand Origin, and Self-Image Congruence on Purchase Intention: Evidence From Chinas Auto Industry
Yongqiang Li Xuehua Wang Zhilin Yang

ABSTRACT. This study aims to investigate the effects of corporate-brand credibility, perceived corporate-brand origin, and self-image congruence on purchase intention. A cross-city survey of Chinas automobile industry was conducted in four major Mainland cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chengdu). Results reveal that corporate-brand credibility, perceived corporate-brand origin, and selfimage congruence have direct positive impacts on purchase intention. Furthermore, corporate-brand credibility and self-image congruence both act as moderating variables in the relationship between corporate-brand origin and purchase intention. Corporate-brand credibility is more signicant in inuencing consumers purchase intention toward the brand than perceived corporate-brand origin. KEYWORDS. Brand credibility, brand origin, self-image congruence, purchase intention, China

During the past decade, corporate branding has been receiving increasing attention due to more intensied competition, lack of differentiation, and rapid growth of the service economy (Fombrun, 1996). An important research area in understanding how to build well-reputed corporate brands focuses on credibility. The credibility of a corporate brand is a key factor inuencing a companys success (Goldsmith, Lafferty, & Newell, 2000). Prior research has established that the more credible a corporate brand, the

higher is the purchase intention toward the brand (e.g., Winters, 1988). Brand origin refers to the effect of a brands country of origin (COO) on consumers (Ahmed & dAstous, 1995; Johansson, Douglas, & Nonaka, 1985; Kim & Chung, 1997; Thakor, 1996; Thakor & Lavack, 2003). Prior research in this eld indicates that consumers in developing countries or areas prefer foreign brands from more developed economies, because these foreign brands represent social status, high quality,

The authors gratefully acknowledge a grant from the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong SAR (Project 9041618, CityU 152110) and a grant from City University of Hong Kong (CityU SRG Project 7002255) for nancial support. Yongqiang Li, PhD, is Professor in the Department of Marketing, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Xuehua Wang, PhD, is Assistant Professor in the Department of Marketing, School of International Business Administration, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China. Zhilin Yang, PhD, is Associate Professor in the Department of Marketing, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong. Address correspondence to Zhilin Yang, PhD, Department of Marketing, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave., Kowloon, Hong Kong. E-mail: mkzyang@cityu.edu.hk
58

Li, Wang, and Yang

59

and fashion (Papadopoulos, 1993; Verlegh & Steenkamp, 1999). Consumers often confuse brand origin to various degrees (Zhuang, Wang, Zhou, & Zhou, 2008), especially for foreignsounding names in Mainland China. This study does not intend to investigate corporate brands real origins but to examine the effect of consumers perceived brand origin on purchase intention. Hence, an interesting question arises as to which trait, either corporate-brand credibility or perceived corporate-brand origin, is more signicant in inuencing consumers purchase intention; few studies have answered this question (e.g., Wang & Yang, 2008; Zhuang et al., 2008). A case in point involves a Chinese company, previously named the Sanlu Group, that illegally produced the toxic infant formula that was exposed in 2008. This group has recently changed its corporate brand to a foreign sounding one, Ballad Co., the effect of which still remains undocumented, calling for more research to investigate consumers perceptions toward corporatebrand credibility and corporate-brand origin. Consumers often compare the brand image with their own images in making a purchase. Consumer behavior literature has pointed out that self-image congruence with product/brand image can inuence brand preference, brand choice, customer satisfaction, and purchase intention (Sirgy et al., 1997). Thus, it is desirable to examine the effect of self-image congruence with corporate-brand on purchase intention. Kressmann et al. (2006) further nd that self-image congruity can motivate consumers to process product- and/or brand-related information, resulting in higher product/brand involvement. However, few studies have investigated self-image congruence with corporate brand, together with corporate-brand credibility and perceived corporate-brand origin on purchase intention. Therefore, the objectives of this study are twofold: rst, to investigate the main effects of corporate-brand credibility, perceived corporate-brand origin, and self-image congruence on purchase intention; and, second, to compare the signicance of corporate-brand credibility and perceived corporate-brand origin on purchase intention. Our research context

is in China, a major emerging economy. With successful replications, our results can be generalized to other similar economies.

CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND AND DEVELOPMENT OF HYPOTHESES Corporate-Brand Credibility

Source credibility refers to the degree to which the receiver believes the source has relevant knowledge and/or expertise and thus trusts the information offered by the source (Ohanian, 1990). Source credibility is considered an important factor inuencing attitudes and purchase intention (Lutz et al., 1983). Ohanian (1990) suggests a three dimensional construct to measure an endorsers source credibility (i.e., expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness). Corporate credibility plays an important role in inuencing consumer purchase intentions (Lafferty, Goldsmith, & Newell, 2002). Previous studies have examined corporate credibility from three perspectives (i.e., advertiser credibility) (MacKenzie & Lutz, 1989), advertiser reputation (Goldberg & Hartwick, 1990), and an important factor inuencing corporate reputation (Fombrun, 1996) (i.e., corporate credibility). Corporate credibility refers to the extent to which consumers and other stakeholders believe in the companys trustworthiness, expertise, and likeableness, which contributes to a corporations whole image (Fombrun, 1996). Keller (2003) suggests that corporate brands indicate common product/brand associations, benets, values, attitudes, relationships, and corporate credibility. In this study, we focus only on corporate-brand credibility, which is consumers belief in a rms brand. With regard to the three components of corporate-brand credibility, expertise denes the degree to which a corporate brand possesses relevant knowledge and skills; trustworthiness refers to the degree to which a corporate brand is thought to be an honest source of products, services and other information; and likeableness means the degree to which a corporate brand is valued by consumers in terms of sympathetic behavior, perseverance, smartness,

60

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL MARKETING

and other personality-related characteristics (Hovland, Janis, & Kelley, 1953; Keller, 2003). It is suggested that corporate-brand credibility can be used to evaluate the companys products/services, hence affecting consumers purchase intention (Fombrun, 1996). Strong and positive corporate-brand credibility can enhance overall brand image and positively inuence brand equity, resulting in higher purchase intention (Aaker & Joachimsthaler, 2000). Consistent with Winters (1988) and Davis (1994), both of whom nd that perceived credibility of a corporation would be positively related to sales, we hypothesize that: H1: The more favorable the corporate brands credibility is, the more likely is the purchase intention of a brand.

Corporate-Brand Origin
Country-of-origin (COO) effect refers to the degree to which consumers use the country where a product is manufactured as an extrinsic cue to make purchasing decisions (Cordell, 1992; Kwok, Uncles, & Huang, 2006; Papadopoulos, 1993). COO can affect consumers decision making in various ways, including product evaluation (Al-Sulaiti & Baker, 1998; Han & Terpstra, 1988; Haubl, 1996; Yasin, Noor, & Mohamad, 2007), quality perception (Johansson & Thorelli, 1985), and purchase intention (Heslop &Papadopoulos, 1993; Hong & Wyer, 1989). With the continuing globalization of markets, many global companies have sourced from multiple countries; therefore, it is more and more difcult to identify a products COO by manufacturing location (Clarke, Owens, & Ford, 2000). In contrast, the impact of brand origin has been increasingly greater on consumer purchase intention than has manufacturing origin (Papadopoulos, 1993). Brand origin research investigates the effect that COO of brands has on consumers (cf. Ahmed & dAstous, 1995; Johansson et al., 1985; Kim & Chung, 1997; Thakor, 1996; Thakor & Lavack, 2003). Zhou and Hui (2003) nd that brand origin can affect consumers perceptions of quality, as well as attitudes and purchase intentions. In emerging

economies, consumers prefer foreign brands to local brands because of their positive symbolic meanings, such as modernity and the high social status associated with foreign brands (Zhou & Belk, 2004). Thus, if a country is positive in terms of a certain image association with respect to specic product category dimensions, which are signicant to brand consideration, then consumers would hold more favorable and positive attitudes toward these brands, resulting in higher purchase intention toward products of this category from that country (Roth & Romeo, 1992). As pointed out by Hsieh, Pan, and Setiono (2004), consumers attitudes toward brand origin image can affect their brand purchase intention. Lin and Chen (2006), for instance, observe that brand origin image is signicantly positively related to consumers purchase intention through providing empirical evidence for the purchase of insurance and catering services. Thus, we hypothesize that: H2: Perceived corporate-brand origin tends to be positively related to purchase intention. Consumers do not make a purchase based only on perceived corporate-brand origin. Compared with corporate-brand origin, consumers may place more emphasis on corporate-brand credibility, which can provide them greater and more specic assurance about quality and functions (e.g., Goldsmith et al., 2000). Consumers may develop various associations, even feelings, about a corporate brand, such as perceptions of corporate-brand personality characteristics, which form a part of corporate-brand image and enhance corporate-brand credibility. For instance, a public utility company may be personied as a responsible, traditional, and middleaged man. Hence, we hypothesize that: H3: Corporate-brand credibility tends to be more signicant in inuencing consumers purchase intention toward the brand than perceived corporate-brand origin.

Self-Image Congruence
Based on self-image congruity theory, the congruence between consumers self-image and

Li, Wang, and Yang

61

the brand-user image can partially affect consumer behavior (Sirgy et al., 1997). Selfcongruity types can be classied into four types (Sirgy, 1982), based on four types of self-concept (i.e., actual, ideal, social, and ideal social congruity). Actual congruity refers to the congruence between an individuals actual self and how they think a typical user of a certain brand should be. In the same manner, ideal congruity is the comparison between the attributes of a typical brand user and how consumers would like to be (ideal congruity); social congruity is between the attributes of a typical brand user and how they think signicant others consider them; ideal social congruity compares the attributes of a typical brand user with how they want to be seen by signicant others. High self-congruity occurs if a brand-user image matches an individuals self-image (Sirgy et al., 1997), and vice versa. Evidence for the effect of self-image congruence on brand choice, preference, and loyalty is also provided in marketing literature (e.g., Ericksen & d Sirgy, 1992; Sirgy, 1985; Sirgy, Grewal, & Mangleburg, 2000; Sirgy & Johar, 1999). Prior studies also show that self-image congruence results in better product evaluation, greater satisfaction, and even higher purchase intention (e.g., Ericksen & Sirgy, 1992; Sirgy, 1985; Sirgy et al., 2000; Sirgy & Johar, 1999). However, substantive evidence is lacking for self-image congruence with corporate-brand images. In line with prior ndings on the positive inuence of self-image congruence on purchase intention, we hypothesize that: H4: The higher the perceived degree of selfimage and corporate-brand image congruity, the more likely the purchase intention is toward the brand.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Questionnaire and Measures

The questionnaire consisted of two sections. The rst part measured four factors (corporatebrand credibility, perceived corporate-brand origin, self-image congruence, and purchase intention; see the Appendix); the second part recorded

the demographic information pertaining to the respondents. The questionnaire was originally in English; then it was translated and backtranslated into Chinese until acceptable translation accuracy was achieved. Corporate-brand credibility was measured by adapting Newell and Goldsmith (2001)s and Ohanian (1990)s scales. Four items, such as I trust the corporation and The corporation makes truthful claims, measure how trustworthy consumers perceive the company to be. Another four items, such as The corporation is skilled in what they do and The corporation has great expertise, evaluate how much expertise a company possesses. Likeability was measured by three items including The corporatebrand is very attractive, I like the corporate brand very much, and The corporate-brand is classy. Thus, 11 items with anchors ranging from 1 (absolutely disagree) to 7 (absolutely agree), with a Cronbachs alpha reliability coefcient of .89, were used for measurement. Roth and Romeo (1992)s scale was adapted to measure corporate-brand origin. Respondents were asked to indicate the extent to which they agreed that the corporate brand possessed the following characteristics [i.e., innovativeness (using new technology), good design (appearance and style), prestige (status and reputation), and workmanship (reliability, durability, craftsmanship, and quality)]. Nine items with anchors ranging from 1 (absolutely disagree) to 7 (absolutely agree), with a Cronbachs alpha reliability coefcient of .90, were used for measurement. Self-image congruence was measured by adapting Sirgy et al. (1997)s 7-point scale with a Cronbachs coefcient alpha of .91, which has been extensively used in prior research (e.g., OCass & Grace, 2008). Respondents were required to compare their self-images with the corporate-brand image in responding to the selfimage congruence scale items, which include The corporate-brand image is consistent with my self-image, The corporate-brand image reects who I am, People similar to me use such a corporate brand, Other users are very much like me, and This corporate-brand image is a mirror image of me. A 7-point Likert item with 1 meaning absolutely impossible and 7 meaning absolutely possible was used to measure

62

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL MARKETING

purchase intention (e.g., Dodds, Monroe, & Grewal, 1991). In addition, because product knowledge has been identied as a potential factor inuencing purchase intention, we incorporated it as a control variable. Product knowledge was measured by using a 7-point semantic differential scale to respond to the sentence Please circle one of the numbers below to describe your familiarity with cars with the anchors being not at all familiar and extremely familiar (Brucks, 1985).

allows for a validity assessment of the measures used. The t indices ( 2 /df = 1.83, p = .000, goodness-of-t index [GFI] = .91, adjusted goodness-of-t index [AGFI] = .92, conrmatory t index [CFI] = .95, normed t index [NFI] = .93, root mean squared error of approximation [RMSEA] = .04) suggest a good t of the measurement model. All items loaded signicantly (critical ratio [CR] > 1.96) on their corresponding constructs. Therefore, evidence of trait validity is provided for the dependent measures (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988).

Pilot Study
A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the content validity of the measurement scales contained in the questionnaire. Content validity can be assessed by a group of judges or experts who decide whether the test represents all of the content of a particular construct (Judd, Smith, & Kidder, 1991). After evaluation by four academicians and ve local professionals in this eld, some items were reworded based on their feedback. Subsequently, the questionnaire was administered to 50 local consumers who were recruited through a local newspaper advertisement. They were required to answer, review, and critique the questionnaire. On completion of this task, they were compensated with RMB50 (approximately US$7.4). All 50 questionnaires were useful; the questionnaire was then revised and nalized based on their feedback.

Data Collection and Sample

We conducted the survey in four major Mainland cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, and Guangzhou), which enjoy a higher income per capita and a better standard of living than other cities in Mainland China, indicating that there should be more potential automobile buyers and owners in these locations, thus providing a more solid statistical foundation. Survey brands were the major auto company brands in China, including FAW Volkswagen, Shanghai General Motors, Guangzhou Honda, Tianjin Toyota, Dongfeng Nissan, FAW Mazda, BHMC, Dongfeng Citroen, Changan Ford, Shanghai Volkswagen, and Dongfeng Peugeot. We used random sampling in recruiting respondents through a large research agency. A total of 800 questionnaires were distributed in this study. Each respondent was interviewed by a well-trained interviewer, in person, and required to answer all questions contained in the questionnaire, and, on completion of this task, received RMB100 (approximately US$14.7) as nominal compensation. Finally, 477 usable cases with a response rate of 59.6% were collected. There were 225 female (47.2%) and 252 male (52.8%) respondents. The respondents ages were mainly older than 30 years (69.8%). Most of them had junior college diplomas or higher (66.0%). Their careers fell primarily into two categories: business and research. Most respondents had a personal monthly income of more than RMB5000 (45.8%; approximately US$735.3)

Reliability and Validity

The reliability of constructs used was tested by using Cronbachs coefcient alpha, which ranged from .89 to .91, much larger than the standard of .7 (Churchill, 1979; Nunnally, 1978). Since all measures were based on prior relevant literature and were often used or adapted in research (e.g., Lin & Chen, 2006), evidence of content validity was provided. To test validity issues, measures (productbrand personality, corporate-brand credibility, subjective product knowledge, and purchase intention) were subjected to a conrmatory factor analysis (CFA) through AMOS 5.0. The CFA

Li, Wang, and Yang

63

and a monthly household income of more than RMB8000 (53.4%; approximately US$1176.5).

ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

Hierarchical regression analysis was used to test hypotheses, after controlling for gender, age, education level, personal/household monthly income, career/working industry, and product knowledge. Gender, education, and industry were dummied in the regression analysis. The averages of scale items of each construct were used as inputs in the regression analysis. Finally, a total of four regression models were developed, as presented in Table 1. H1 predicted that corporate-brand credibility would be positively related to purchase intention. According to model 1, the R 2 change is 11% and is statistically signicant at the p < .001 level with a positive standardized regression coefcient (.31) of corporate-brand credibility, hence supporting H1.

H2 hypothesized that corporate-brand origin exerted a positive inuence on purchase intention. Based on models 2 and 3, the R 2 change is 4.0% (p < .001) with a positive standardized regression coefcient (.18) of product-brand personality, indicating that corporate-brand origin is signicantly and positively related to purchase intention. Thus, H2 is supported. It was predicted by H3 that corporate-brand credibility was more important to consumers than perceived corporate-brand origin. As shown in model 3, the standardized regression coefcient of corporate-brand credibility (.25) is much larger than that of corporate-brand origin (.18), indicating that corporate-brand credibility is more important to consumers than perceived corporate-brand origin. Therefore, H3 is supported. H4 hypothesized a positive relationship between self-image congruence and purchase intention. According to models 3 and 4, the R 2 change for self-image congruence is 4% and the standardized regression coefcient is .23 for self-image congruence. Thus, H4 is supported.

TABLE 1. Hierarchical Regression Analysis Results

Explanatory Variables Gender Age Education level Career Personal monthly income Household monthly income Subjective product knowledge Corporate-brand credibility Model 1 Model 2 (.31)1 (.40)2 Corporate-brand origin Model 3 (.25)1 (.28)2 (.19)1 (.22)2 Self-image congruence Model 4 (.22)1 (.24)2 (.15)1 (.19)2 (.23)1 (.27)2 3.58 13.41 (p < .001) .34 .04 .29 .000

Constant F

R2 R 2 change Adj R 2 Overall model p -value

1.98 10.27 (p < .001) .15 .15 .13 .000

2.54 10.70 (p < .001) .26 .11 .22 .000

3.79 9.85 (p < .001) .30 .04 .25 .000

Note. 1 standardized regression coefcient; 2 unstandardized regression coefcient.

64

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL MARKETING

DISCUSSION
This paper aims to investigate the effects of corporate-brand credibility, corporate-brand origin, and self-image congruence on purchase intention. Results reveal that these three independent variables are all positively related to purchase intention. Furthermore, we nd that consumers attach more importance to corporatebrand credibility than to corporate-brand origin. Implications for research as well as practice will be discussed. First, the more credible a corporate brand, the higher is the purchase intention, which is in line with prior research on corporate-brand credibility (e.g., Lafferty et al., 2002). As pointed out by one of our respondents: Its very important for me to choose a credible and responsible company, because what Im concerned (about) is after-sales service; especially when there is any fatal problem with the car, the company wouldnt make an excuse. Corporate-brand credibility partially contributes to overall corporate credibility. Lafferty and Goldsmith (1999) observe that corporate credibility is positively related to purchase intention. Second, perceived corporate-brand origin perceptions are also positively related to purchase intention. Consumers in emerging economies, such as China, prefer products/brands originating from developed countries or regions, because of the stereotyped image associated with foreign brands such as high social status, modernity, and cosmopolitanism (e.g., Zhou & Belk, 2004). Thus, many Chinese rms use foreign-sounding names to confuse consumers about their brand origins so as to enhance their perceived foreign-brand origin effect. For instance, the percentage of brand origin misperception for Jasonwood, a local Chinese casual wear brand, reached an astonishing 75% (Zhuang et al., 2008). However, consumers tend to perceive local brands to be foreign brands or foreign brands to be local brands because of their confusion about the brand origins. As stated earlier, the producer of the toxic infant formula, Sanlu Group, also changed its original name to a foreign sounding one (Ballad Co.) to make use of this foreign brand origin effect, since foreign brands

typically represent rigid product tests and high quality. However, this strategy takes effect only when consumers do not know that Ballad Co. is merely a transformation of the original Sanlu Group. Thus, brand knowledge may be a potential moderator between perceived brand origin and purchase intention (Zhuang et al., 2008). Assuming brand knowledge is held constant, the question becomes which trait, between corporate-brand credibility and perceived corporate-brand origin, is more important to consumers. Results reveal that the standardized regression coefcient of corporate-brand credibility is much larger than that of perceived corporate-brand origin, indicating that consumers do attach more importance to corporate-brand credibility than to perceived corporate-brand origin. Finally, the more congruent an individuals self-image is with corporate-brand image, the higher the purchase intention tends to be, which is also consistent with prior research (e.g., Ericksen & Sirgy, 1992; Sirgy & Johar, 1999). Similarly, other research studies nd that selfimage congruence would inuence consumers in terms of brand preference, loyalty, and satisfaction (e.g., Chebat, Sirgy, & St-James, 2006; Sirgy, 1985). For instance, Chebat et al. (2006) recently suggest that shopping mall managers should customize the malls image to match the self-image of the target audience.

Managerial Implications
This study also generates useful implications for rms when making decisons about corporate branding. It is of perennial importance to enhance a corporate brands credibility. Ways of doing so include company-brand endorsement strategies and brand line campaigns. For instance, rms can increase the strength, favorability, and uniqueness of their corporate brands through prominent logo displays on product packaging. Using publicity measures is also benecial in building good corporate-brand images. Sego (2002) nds that when a company is linked to a social issue, involvement with the social issue will increase for credible companies. Further, compared to corporate-brand credibility, corporate-brand origin is perceived as less

Li, Wang, and Yang

65

signicant in inuencing purchasing intention, indicating that emphasizing the brand origin may not be as effective as it was in China. Instead, corporate-brand credibility is still the most important issue to consumers. In addition, it is also important for companies to understand that self-image congruence is also signicantly related to purchase intention. Companies need to conduct research on the meanings of specic brand image elements and effectively communicate the desired elements to targeted consumers. For instance, Chinese consumers prefer to attach prestige and social status to car purchase. In addition, it is also desirable to investigate different local markets for guidance.

research to further study the effects of each dimension of corporate-brand origin on purchase intention so as to give more insights into relevant phenomena. Finally, we recognize that there are other unexplored factors inuencing consumer purchase intention, such as personality characteristics, social contexts, and peer pressure. Further research ought to examine more relevant variables so as to offer a more comprehensive understanding in this regard. REFERENCES
Aaker, D., & Joachimsthaler, E. (2000). Brand leadership. New York, NY: The Free Press. Ahmed, S. A., & dAstous, A. (1995). Comparison of country of origin effects on household and organizational buyers product perceptions. European Journal of Marketing, 29(3), 3551. Al-Sulaiti, K. I., & Baker, M. (1998). Country-of-origin effects: A literature review. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 16(3), 150199. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411423. Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(2), 116. Chebat, J. C., Sirgy, M. J., & St-James V. (2006). Upscale image transfer from malls to stores: A self-image congruence explanation. Journal of Business Research, 59(12), 12881296. Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 6473. Clarke, I., Owens, M., & Ford, J. B. (2000). Integrating country of origin into global marketing strategy: A review of US marking statutes. International Marketing Review, 17(2), 114126. Cordell, V. V. (1992). Effects of consumer preferences for foreign sourced products. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2), 251269. Davis, J. J. (1994). Consumer response to corporate environmental advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11(2), 2547. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brands, and store information on buyers product evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307319. Ericksen, M. K., & Sirgy, M. J. (1992). Employed females clothing preference, self-image congruence, and career anchorage. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(5), 408422.

Limitations and Future Research

Limitations of this study directing future research need to be noted. First, our study may suffer from self-generated validity problems (Feldman & Lynch, 1988). Informants are very likely to know what answers we are looking for simply by seeing how the questions are framed in the survey. Future research should use steps suggested by Feldman and Lynch (1988) such as extensive pretests and eld experiments to handle this problem. Second, brand knowledge may act as a potential moderator in the relationship between perceived corporate brand origin and purchase intention. Further research should include this variable. Third, brand involvement has been identied as a potential factor that inuences consumers purchase decisions. Although auto purchase in itself is a high-involvement situation, there might exist different degrees of brand involvement, which may result in various attitudes, thus inuencing purchase behavior. In addition, some respondents may be highly preferential toward the car brand they currently use, thus biasing the sample. Therefore, future research should further investigate brand involvement. Fourth, we did not consider car prices or word-of-mouth effect in our study. Price is an important determinant for car purchase; wordof-mouth can also signicantly inuence purchase intention. Hence, future research need to incorporate these two constructs to provide additional insights. Fifth, it is also desirable for future

66

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL MARKETING

Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421435. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Goldberg, M. E., & Hartwick, J. (1990). The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 172179. Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 4354. Han, C. M., & Terpstra, V. (1988). Country-of-origin effects for uni-national and bi-national products. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(2), 235255. Haubl, G. (1996). A cross-national investigation of the effects of country of origin and brand name on the evaluation of a new car. International Marketing Review, 13(5), 7697. Heslop, L. A., & Papadopoulos, N. (1993). Product-country images: Impact and role in international marketing. New York, NY: Haworth. Hong, S. T., & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Effects of country-oforigin and product attribute information on product evaluation: An information processing perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 175187. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communications and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Hsieh, M. H., Pan, S. L., & Setiono, R. (2004). Product-, corporate-, and country-image dimensions and purchase behavior: A multicountry analysis. Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 251270. Johansson, J. K., Douglas, S. P., & Nonaka, I. (1985). Assessing the impact of country of origin on product evaluations: A new methodological perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(4), 388396. Johansson, J. K., & Thorelli, H. B. (1985). International product positioning. Journal of International Business Studies, 16(3), 5775. Judd, C. M., Smith, E. R., & Kidder, L. H. (1991). Research methods in social relations (6th ed.). New York, NY: Rinehart and Winston. Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Kim, C. K., & Chung, J. Y. (1997). Brand popularity, country image and market share: An empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 361 386. Kressmann, F. M., Sirgy, J., Herrmann, A., Huber, F., Huber, S., & Lee, D. J. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of self-image congruence on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 955964.

Kwok, S., Uncles, M., & Huang, Y. (2006). Brand preferences and brand choices among urban Chinese consumers. Asia Pacic Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 18(3), 163172. Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibilitys role in consumers attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 109116. Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., & Newell, S. J. (2002). The dual credibility model: The inuence of corporate and endorser credibility on attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(3), 112. Lin, L. Y., & Chen, C. S. (2006). The inuence of the country-of-origin image, product knowledge and product involvement on consumer purchase decisions: An empirical study of insurance and catering services in Taiwan. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(5), 248 265. Lutz, R. J., MacKenzie, S. B., & Belch, G. E. (1983). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: Determinants and consequences. In R. P. Bagozzi & A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, vol. 10 (pp. 532539). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude-towardthe-ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 4865. Newell, S. J., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52(3), 235247. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. OCass, A. G., & Grace, D. (2008). Understanding the role of retail store service in light of self-image-store image congruence. Psychology & Marketing, 25(6), 521 537. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 3952. Papadopoulos, N. G. (1993). What product and country images are and are not. In N. G. Papadopoulos & L. Heslop (Eds.), Product-country images: Impact and role in international marketing (pp. 338). New York, NY: International Business Press. Roth, M. S., & Romeo, J. B. (1992). Matching product category and country image perceptions: A framework for managing country-of-origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3), 477497. Sego, T. (2002). When brands and social issues are linked: The relationship between company credibility, company liking, and issues intentions. American Marketing Assosication Conference Proceedings, 13, 171.

Li, Wang, and Yang

67

Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287301. Sirgy, M. J. (1985). Self-image/product image congruity and consumer decision-making. International Journal of Management, 2(4), 4963. Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., & Mangleburg, T. (2000). Retail environment, self-image congruence, and retail patronage: An integrative model and a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 49(2), 127138. Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T. F., Park, J., Chon, K. S., Claiborne, C. B., Johar, J. S., & Berkman, H. (1997). Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(3), 229241. Sirgy, M. J., & Johar, J. S. (1999). Toward an integrated model of self-image congruence and functional congruence. European Advances in Consumer Research, 4, 252256. Thakor, M. V. (1996). Brand origin: Conceptualization and review. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(3), 2739. Thakor, M. V., & Lavack, A. M. (2003). Effect of perceived brand origin associations on consumer perceptions of quality. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 12(6), 394407.

Verlegh, P. W. J., & Steenkamp, J. E. M. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521546. Wang, X., & Yang, Z. (2008). Does country-of-origin matter in the relationship between brand personality and purchase intention in emerging economies? Evidence from Chinas auto industry. International Marketing Review, 25(4), 458474. Winters, L. C. (1988). Does it pay to advertise to hostile audiences with corporate advertising? Journal of Advertising Research, 28(3), 1118. Yasin, N. M., Noor, M. N., & Mohamad, O. (2007). Does image of country-of-origin matter to brand equity? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16(1), 38 48. Zhou, N., & Belk, R.W. (2004). Chinese consumer readings of global and local advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising, 33(3), 6376. Zhou, L., & Hui, M.K. (2003). Symbolic value of foreign products in the Peoples Republic of China. Journal of International Marketing, 11(2), 3658. Zhuang, G., Wang, X., Zhou, L., & Zhou, N. (2008). Asymetric effects of brand origin confusion: Evidence from the emerging market of China. International Marketing Review, 25(4), 441457.

68

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL MARKETING

Appendix. Measures and Items

Measures and Items Purchase Intention Absolutely impossible/absolutely possible (1 to 7) Corporate-Brand Origina Innovativeness (which means using new technology) Good appearance Good style Status Reputation Reliability Durability Craftsmanship Quality Corporate-Brand Credibilitya I trust the corporation. The corporation makes truthful claims. The corporation is honest. I do not believe what the corporation tells me. The corporation is skilled in what they do. The corporation has great expertise. The corporation has a great amount of experience. The corporation does not have much experience. The corporate-brand is very attractive. I like the corporate brand very much. The corporate-brand is classy. Self-Image Congruencea The corporate-brand image is consistent with my self-image. The corporate-brand image reects who I am. People similar to me use such a corporate brand. Other users are very much like me. This corporate-brand image is a mirror image of me. Product Knowledge Not at all familiar/extremely familiar (1 to 7)
Note. a Measured on a scale from 1 (absolutely disagree) to 7 (absolutely agree).

Source Dodds et al. (1991) Roth and Romeo (1992)

Newell and Goldsmith (2001); Ohanian (1990)

Sirgy et al. (1997)

Brucks (1985)

Copyright of Journal of Global Marketing is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.