Professional Documents
Culture Documents
deformable body
particle modeling
DEM analysis
MATHEMATICAL INTERPLETATION OF MATHEMATICAL INTERPLETATION OF RIGID-BODY SPRING MODEL RIGID-BODY SPRING MODEL
Non-Overlapping Functions for Discretization
ordinary FEM u1 DEM u1 u2
u2
PARTICLE DISCRETIZATION FOR PARTICLE DISCRETIZATION FOR FUNCTION AND DERIVATIVE FUNCTION AND DERIVATIVE
Discretization of Function f(x) in terms of { (x)}
f d ( x ) = f ( x )
form of discretization
g id ( x ) = g i ( x )
form of discretization
E f ({f }) = (f ( x ) f d ( x )) 2 ds
V
minimize Ef
f =
1 V ds V
f ds
g i =
1 V ds
( ds )f
V ,i
xn
mother points
xn+1
df ( x ) = g( x ) = g ( x ) dx
y n-1 yn y n+1
middle point of neighboring mother points average slope of interval for is coefficient of characteristic function
function and derivative are discretized in terms of sets of non-overlapping characteristic functions, such that function and derivative are uniform in Voronoi blocks and Delaunay triangles,
COMPARISON OF PARTICLE DISCRETIZATION COMPARISON OF PARTICLE DISCRETIZATION WITH ORDINARY DISCRETIZATION WITH ORDINARY DISCRETIZATION
f1 f2 f3
f1
x1 f2
f1 f2 f3
+
particle discretization
=
x2
f3 x3
derivative of particle discretization coincides with slope of plane which is formed by linearly connecting Voronoi mother points
PARTICLE DISCRETIZATION TO PARTICLE DISCRETIZATION TO CONTINUUM MECHANICS PROBLEM CONTINUUM MECHANICS PROBLEM
Conjugate Functional
J (u , ) = ij ij 1 ijcijkl kl ds 2
V
ij = ij
u i = u i
hypo-Voronoi for displacement Delaunay for stress: coefficients are analytically obtained by stationarizing J
x1
([k
[k12 ] = [k
direct 12
]T = [k ij ] ji
indirect 12
)
2 x2 3 x3
] + [k
cut two springs of direct and indirect interaction together or separately, according to certain failure criterion of continuum
0.000520
0.000510
J-integral
0.000500
3 A 1 Q B
Number of Elements
uniform tension
0.006
0.004
0.002
d
0.002
0.000 2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
0.000 5 10
104
103
102
NDF
displacement norm:
d =
|| u u || dv || u || dv
2 B 2 B
case b
DIFFERENCE IN CRACK GROWTH: DIFFERENCE IN CRACK GROWTH: DISTRIBUTION OF NORMAL STRAIN DISTRIBUTION OF NORMAL STRAIN
case a
case b
Brazilian test
SIMULATION OF FOUR POINT BENDING TEST SIMULATION OF FOUR POINT BENDING TEST
four point bending test
FOUR POINT BENDING WITH FOUR POINT BENDING WITH IDEARLY HOMOGENEOUS MATERIALS IDEARLY HOMOGENEOUS MATERIALS
FEM- puts two source of local heterogeneity, 1) mesh quality for particle discretization and 2) crack path along Voronoi boundary. An ideally homogeneous material which is modeled with best mesh quality sometimes fail to simulate crack propagation.
Failure Analysis
simple but robust treatment of failure Monte-Carlo simulation for studying local heterogeneity effects on failure - candidates of failure patterns are pre-determined by spatial discretization