Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bangladesh
December 2011
The Fund for Peace is an independent, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) non-profit research and educational organization that works to prevent violent conflict and promote sustainable security. We promote sustainable security through research, training and education, engagement of civil society, building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. A leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the Fund for Peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing states. Our objective is to create practical tools and approaches for conflict mitigation that are useful to decision-makers.
Copyright 2011 The Fund for Peace. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent from The Fund for Peace.
Country Profiles Series Editor J. J. Messner Country Profile Written by Kristen Blandford and Raphal Jaeger The Fund for Peace Publication FFP : CCPPR11BD (Version 12R) Circulation: PUBLIC
The Fund for Peace 1720 I Street NW 7th Floor Washington, D.C. 20006 T: +1 202 223 7940 F: +1 202 223 7947 www.fundforpeace.org
www.fundforpeace.org
Profile
Bangladesh
Numbers
Pressures
Failed States Index Score Failed States Index Rank Average Indicator Score Year-on-Year
Capacity
Core 5 + 2 Average Score Core 5 + 2 Rank
Combined
Capacity Minus Pressures
94.4
Maximum 120
25th
of 177 countries
7.9
Maximum 10
-1.7
Improvement
3.5
Maximum 10
139th
of 177 countries
-4.4
Pressures Assessment:
Capacity Assessment:
Alert
Weak
Outlook
Political instability, natural disasters, lack of nec e ss ar y r es ou rc es, i nt er na ti on al dependence, and poor economic policies are key factors preventing Bangladesh from realizing its economic potential. Corruption and impunity among the police and civil services inspire fear and instability throughout the country. Although such pressures are still apparent and present, the country is attempting to reduce their effects with a focus on more educational services and economic reforms. The consolidation of the democratically elected government for another year is a positive development for the c o u nt r y s s t a b i l i t y . P o li ti c a l factionalization seems to be a pressure that will not dissipate quickly, but the governments recent efforts and the international communitys support will hopefully keep the country on its gradual incline towards social, economic, and political improvement.
Comparative Statistics
Population GDP Per Capita (PPP) US$
Qatar D.R. Congo
Life Expectancy
Median Age
158,500,000
China Seychelles 1,339,000,000 86,500
1,585
US
23.5
Japan Swaziland
US
years
82.6 years 39.6 years
64.1
Japan Uganda
years
44.6 years 15.0 years
$ 91,379 $ 319
www.fundforpeace.org
Indicators
8.3
36th Poor
Year-on-Year Trend
6.5
52nd Weak
Year-on-Year Trend
9.2
9th Poor
Year-on-Year Trend
8.1
10th Poor
Year-on-Year Trend
8.4
30th Poor
Year-on-Year Trend
7.7
30th Weak
Year-on-Year Trend
Steady
5-Year Trend
Steady
5-Year Trend
Worsened
5-Year Trend
Improved
5-Year Trend
Improved
5-Year Trend
Steady
5-Year Trend
Improved
Worsened
Steady
Improved
Improved
Worsened
Bangladeshs Demographic Pressures score improved slightly as the government stepped up its food security program.
Bangladesh has an estimated 6 million workers abroad, including over 80,000 professionals who are expected to leave Libya. Bangladeshs Human Flight score decreased as economic growth returned to pre-global crisis levels.
The latest flooding has forced more than 10,000 people to flee their homes in 2011. In addition, 200,000 refugees from Myanmar live in the country, including 30,000 in two official camps.
The
Uneven
Development
indicator
The Group Grievance score increased 0.3 points due to attacks against ethnic minorities in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. A recent bill enabled the Hindu minority to reclaim its property taken under a controversial law enacted by the government in the 1960s.
Bangladeshs Poverty and Decline score improved slightly as growth in the nonagricultural sectors fueled increased consumption.
www.fundforpeace.org
Bangladesh
8.0
42nd Weak
Year-on-Year Trend
8.0
41st Weak
Year-on-Year Trend
7.1
59th Weak
Year-on-Year Trend
7.9
30th Weak
Year-on-Year Trend
8.9
19th Poor
Year-on-Year Trend
6.2
88th Weak
Year-on-Year Trend
Steady
5-Year Trend
Improved
5-Year Trend
Improved
5-Year Trend
Steady
5-Year Trend
Steady
5-Year Trend
Steady
5-Year Trend
Improved
Worsened
Improved
Improved
Steady
Steady
The Legitimacy of the State score remained high at 8.0, reflecting the fragile stability maintained by the current government. The next general elections are scheduled for 2013.
The Security Apparatus score remained stable as the number of vigilante killings decreased.
The Factionalized Elites score remained high due to the intense rivalry between Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia.
Bangladeshs
Public
Services
score
The Human Rights score improved, as the government made commitments address issues in the country. to
Cycling through successive military coups and unstable governments, Bangladesh is currently ruled by an interim emergency government. While elections in 2008 represented significant improvement in the countrys adherence to democratic principles, subsequent infighting and rampant corruption has hindered political progress. The prevalence of corruption, extrajudicial killings by security forces, violence against women, and attacks against the media and political opposition are serious concerns.
www.fundforpeace.org
The large chart represents a magnified portion of the full scale, shown below:
120
106 90 104
Alert
60 102 30 100 0 98 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
96
94 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Multi-Indicator Comparison
Pressures
Pressures better than average
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Capacities
Capacity lower than average
0 10 20 30
Average of all 177 countries Somalia: Worst Performer Austria: Best Performer
A visual representation of the proportion of the total pressure and capacity scores that are contributed by each individual indicator. Each color within the bar chart corresponds to the colors of the 12 Failed States Index (pressure) indicators and the 7 Core 5+2 (capacity) indicators. Guidelines are also provided to demonstrate the average score for all 177 countries, as well as the extremes of best and worst performers.
www.fundforpeace.org
Bangladesh
4.9
Moderate
2.1
Weak
4.0
Weak
3.0
Weak
1.7
Poor
6.7
Good
2.1
Weak
Israel Georgia
Argentina 4.0
Low Capacity
2.0
This chart compares pressures with capacities by comparing the Failed States Index score (representing pressures) with an average indicator score for the Core 5+2 (representing capacity). Note that the capacity score is an average, as not all countries have been assessed for all Core 5+2 indicators as yet, due to insufficient data. (Note that the capacity measures are still under development.)
Libya Paraguay
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Myanmar
C.A.R. Zimbabwe
Somalia
Low Pressure
20
40
60
80
100
High Pressure
120
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
+2
+4
+6
+8
www.fundforpeace.org
www.fundforpeace.org
FFP : CCPPR11BD