Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SuperStructure
Design (Above
Ground Works)
GeoStructConsultants
ENB471DesignofConcrete
StructuresandFoundations
Consultants
AmandaCarroll06373658
ChungHooi06903258
PhuongPham06364942
TshingLiew06911072
MarkMendoza05756596
TimothyWood06876668
Table of Contents
ExecutiveSummary.......................................................................................................................................4
1.0Introduction............................................................................................................................................5
2.0DesignPhilosophy...................................................................................................................................6
2.1AssumptionsMade.............................................................................................................................6
2.2GravityLoadBearingElementsandLateralLoadResistingFrames...................................................6
2.2.1LayoutReasoning&Considerations............................................................................................6
3.0ComparativeAnalysis..............................................................................................................................8
3.1DesignConsiderations.........................................................................................................................8
3.2GroundFloor.....................................................................................................................................10
3.2.1BandBeamandSlab..................................................................................................................10
3.2.2BeamandSlab............................................................................................................................10
3.2.3Ribbed(Waffle)Slab..................................................................................................................11
3.3Recommendations............................................................................................................................11
3.4TypicalFloorPlateforLevels1to3..................................................................................................12
3.4.1FlatPlate....................................................................................................................................12
3.4.2FlatSlab......................................................................................................................................12
3.4.3Recommendation.......................................................................................................................13
3.5PlantRoomSlab................................................................................................................................13
3.5.1Recommendation.......................................................................................................................13
4.0BuildingLoadings..................................................................................................................................15
4.1VerticalLoads....................................................................................................................................15
4.2WindLoads........................................................................................................................................16
4.3EarthquakeLoads..............................................................................................................................17
5.0DetailedStructureDesign.....................................................................................................................18
5.1PostTension.....................................................................................................................................18
5.2ReinforcedConcrete.........................................................................................................................20
5.2.1SlabSupportSystem..................................................................................................................20
5.2.2DistributionofMoments(Slab).................................................................................................21
5.2.3BendingMoments&ShearForces(Beams)..............................................................................21
5.2.4ReinforcementRequirements....................................................................................................21
5.2.5ReinforcementDetails...............................................................................................................21
2
6.0ColumnandCoreWallLoads...............................................................................................................22
6.1CoreWallDesign...............................................................................................................................22
6.2ColumnDesign..................................................................................................................................24
7.0CostEstimations....................................................................................................................................30
7.1FoundationsConcreteFormWork.................................................................................................30
7.2ExternalWallandFoundations.........................................................................................................30
7.3Costs..................................................................................................................................................30
7.3.1Parking.......................................................................................................................................30
7.3.2ExternalWalls............................................................................................................................30
7.3.3ConcreteWork...........................................................................................................................31
8.0References............................................................................................................................................32
9.0Appendices............................................................................................................................................33
9.1Appendix1DesignLayout..............................................................................................................34
9.2Appendix2ComparativeAnalysis..................................................................................................35
9.3Appendix3BuildingLoads.............................................................................................................36
9.4Appendix4DetailedStructuralDesign..........................................................................................37
9.4.1Appendix4.1Posttensioned................................................................................................38
9.4.2Appendix4.2ReinforcedConcrete.......................................................................................39
9.5Appendix5LoadbearingDesign...................................................................................................40
9.5.1Appendix5.1Corewall.........................................................................................................41
9.5.2Appendix5.2Column.............................................................................................................42
9.6Appendix6CostEstimation...........................................................................................................43
Executive Summary
GeoStructconsultinghasreceivedandreviewedNewsteadDevelopmentsproposeddesignofthenew
building located at 26 Commercial Road Newstead as Requested. Since then, a professional sub
structural analysis report (Below ground works) has been submitted highlighting recommendations,
accurateCostestimationsanddesignsoffoundation,retentionsystems,andslabspecifications.
Hence, in following this up, GeoStruct has prepared a professional superstructural analysis report
(above ground works) which has improved and made necessary changes to the previously submitted
substructuralanalysis.
Ultimately,thissuperstructurereportconsistsof:
a design philosophy report which highlights appropriate layouts of vertical load bearing
elementscompatiblewiththearchitecturalscheme,
a comparative study forthe floorsthatthroughoutthe building, various loadsthatwillexert
uponthebuilding,
details of structural designs including support systems and distribution of moments for slabs
andbeams,
detailsandrequirementsforreinforcement,
columnandreinforcementspecificsanddesign,and
anaccurateoverallcostestimation
1.0 Introduction
TheprincipalsofGeoStructConsultantshavereviewedabriefgiventothecompanybyNewstead
Developmentsforthedesignofthenewoffice/commercialbuildingat26CommercialRoadNewstead,
andarerequiringthefollowinginorderforthecompanytoprepareafullsubmissiontoNewstead
Developments.
Thesuperstructurereportiscontainedwithin.Thesubstructurereportisincludedinaseparatebinder.
In addition to the design of the superstructure, the design philosophy report will be used to help
illustrateandpointoutvariouslocationsofbothgravityloadbearingelementsandlateralloadresisting
frameandreasonsbehindthechoicesandconsiderationsmade.
Standardsareperfectlyreliable,
columnpositioningwerethesamethroughOfficelevels(levels13),
thebuildingwouldalwaysbeusedforitsintendedpurpose,and
Thetransferbeamsareconsistentintermsofsize
2.2 Gravity Load Bearing Elements and Lateral Load Resisting Frames
Basedonthearchitecturalscheme,appropriatelocationsoftheverticalloadbearingelementssuchas
thebeamshasbeenindentifiedforthegroundfloorandcanbeseeninAppendix1usingacolourcoding
system; beams have been indentified in pink. Other vertical load bearing elements and lateral load
resistingframessuchascolumnsandshear/corewallscanalsobeseeninAppendix1astheytooare
colourcodedandcanbeindentifiedusingtheledgedofcolourcodesshowninontheillustration.
Inadditiontothis,moreaccuratedrawingarrangementsillustratingtheschematicdesignsforthefloor
platesshowingthelocationofloadbearingelementssuchasbeams,columnsandwallscanalsobeseen
inAppendix1,whichillustratestheseelementsinasectionalviewfromSouthtoNorthandEasttoWest
ofthebuilding.
2.2.1 Layout Reasoning & Considerations
Reasons for the placement of beams suggest the nature of the columns that exist in the provided
architectural scheme. In this case for the above ground works, it can be divided into three sections
wherefloorshaddifferentstructurallayoutsanddesign.Thesethreesectionsincludethegroundfloor,
theplantroomandofficefloors(levels13).
In terms of the ground floor, beams were places where necessary depending on the locations of the
columnsand shear/corewalls that existedonboththe basementandground floorlevelsthemselves.
These beams will not only provide the support for the concrete slabs, but in some cases support for
thosewhereopeningssuchasexhaustventsandwherecantileversystemsexist.Othercasesforwhere
beamshavebeenadoptedsuggesttheinconsistencyofcolumnlocationsbetweenvariousfloors;hence
transfer beams are used. One example highlighted in pink can be seen in Appendix 1 in between
sections57andHXnexttothebikehanginglockers.Considerationsandreasonsforthenecessary
adoption of a wider beam located illustrated in Appendix 1 between sections 59, MN highlights the
presenceofacantileversupportsystem.
Intermsoftheofficefloorsandtheplantroomhowever,investigationsfoundthatflatslabswithdrop
panels and flat plates were sufficient enough to meet the design and as a result these systems were
adoptedandcanbeseeninAppendix1illustratedinpurple.Neverthelessitisrecommendedthatflat
platesshould be adopted. Reasonsforadopting such asystemsuggestthatthatnotonlyworkssince
manyofthecolumnsfromlevels13alignandthattheplantroomdoesnotholdsignificantweight,but
itisalsomorecosteffectiveintermsofmaterialsusedoverbeamsandusingflatslabswithdroppanels.
Intermsoflateralloadresistingframes,theadoptionofashearwallisnecessarytotakelateralloads.
Nevertheless, using core walls will help tremendously in resisting lateral loads such as wind. Reasons
suggestingthishighlightsthefactthatthetherearetwocoresinthebuildingthatrunthroughalllevels
of the building and down into the lowest basement. This creates a back bone sort of idea for the
buildingandwillgreatlyenhanceitslateralloadresistingcapabilities.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Architectural
Generale.g.space
requirements&
appearance
FloorzoneThickness
Services
Penetrations
Structural
1. Strength
Construction
1. Generale.g.
constructionmethod
2. Deflection
2. Formwork
3. Cantilevers
3. Reinforcement
4. Vibration
4. Joints
5. CrackControl
Table1DesignConsiderations(CCAA,2003)
Anotherdesignconsiderationistheproposedspansizesoftheslabswhichwillberequiredcomponent
todeterminetheslabthicknessforeachfloor.Themaximumspansizeisapprox8.74mandthisvalue
willbeusedasworstcasetodeterminetheslabthickness.
Anotherdesignconsiderationistodeterminewhichconcretestrengtheningtechniquewillbe
implemented.Thetwooptionsarereinforcedconcreteandprestressedorinthiscaseposttension
concrete.Theaimsofbothtechniquesaretostrengthentheweaknessofconcretewhichisitstensile
strength.Reinforcedconcreteachievesthisbysimplypouringconcreteoverrebarandsteelmeshes.
Whereasposttensionconcreteusesamoresophisticatedmethodwhereconcreteispouredovera
steeltendonandoncetheconcretehasgainedstrengthbutbeforetheserviceloadsareapplied,the
cablesarepulledtight,ortensioned,andanchoredagainsttheouteredgesoftheconcrete.
Nonethelessposttensionedconcretehasmoreadvantagesoverreinforcedconcretewhendealingwith
amultistoreybuilding.
1. Usageofprestressedconcretetranslatestominimalconstructioncostsascomparedtothe
usageofreinforcedconcrete
2. Prestressedconcretemakesuseofthinnerslabs,thenthefloorthicknesssavingscanbe
transformedintoadditionalfloors
3. Usageofprestressedconcreteoftentranslatestoanincreasedfloorspaceinestablishments
4. Areabletospangreaterdistanceswithminimalslabthicknesses
Duetotheattractiveadvantagesofposttensionedconcreteslabstheyarehighlyrecommendedtobe
usedespeciallyinhigherlevels.
3.2 Groun
nd Floor
nsiderationw
whendesigniingthegroundfloorsysttem:
Twomajjorconsideraationsaretaakenintocon
structuralandconstruction.Themajorstructuralconside
erationistheefactthatth
hegroundflo
oorneedsa
ofthebuildin
ngseeninAp
ppendix1.The
largeloaadbearingcaapacityduetthearchitectturallayouto
construcctionconsideerationtaken
nisthefacttthatduetotthelocationandeaseofaccessibilityofthe
construcctingthegro
oundfloormeansthereisspotentialfo
orsavingsecconomically..Thethreeproposed
floorsysstemsfortheegroundfloo
orare:
1. BandBeamandSlab
2. BeamandSllab
3. Ribbed(wafffle)Slab
3.2.1 Band Beam and Slab
ngtoCement&ConcreteeAssociation
nofAustraliaa(2003)con
nsistsofaseeriesof
Thissysttemaccordin
parallel,wideshallow
wbeams(kn
nownasband
dbeamsortthickenedslaabbands)withthefloorslab
bisdesignedasacontinu
uousslab,wiiththe
spanningtransverselybetweenttheband.TThefloorslab
ninFigure1.
shallowbandbeamsscarryingallloadsfromttheslabseen
Figu
ure1Bandbeamandsslab
(CCAA,2
2003)
3.2.2 Beam
m and Slab
dingtoCemeent&ConcreeteAssociatiionofAustraalia(2003)cconsistsofbe
eams
Thissysttemisaccord
framingintocolumn
nsandsuppo
ortingslabsspanningbetweenthebeeamsseenintheabovefigure.Itisaa
ditionalsyste
em.Therelaativelydeepb
beamsprovideastifffloo
orcapableoflongspans,,andableto
o
verytrad
resistlatteralloads.
10
0
3.2.3 Ribbe
ed (Waffle) Slab
dingtoCemeent&ConcreeteAssociatio
onofAustralia(2003)consistsofeq
qually
Ribbedffloorsaccord
spacedrribsareusuaallysupporteeddirectlybyycolumns.Th
heyareeitheeronewaysspanningsystemsknown
n
asribbedslaboratw
wowayribbedsystemkn
nownasaw
waffleslab.TThisfloorsysstemcanbeseenin
Figure2below.
Figu
ure2Ribbe
edslab
(CCAA,2
2003)
3.3 Recom
mmendattions
ppendix2,th
hefloorslabsystemreco
ommended
AftercomparingtheeadvantagessanddisadvaantagesinAp
ndslabsystem
mwithaslab
bthicknesso
of200mman
ndatotalthickness(slab+beam)of
isthebaandbeaman
450mmwithbeamw
widthof1200mm,which
hexceedstheerecommen
ndationfromCement&C
Concrete
pendix2.Itiismorethan
nadequateto
ohandletheeloadsfrom
AssociattionofAustralia(2003)ggraphsinApp
theuppeerfloors.Theeotherreaso
onsarethessimplicityofformworkm
meaningsavin
ngsinconstrructioncostss
aswellaasthebeamssbeingofshallownatureecreatingmo
oreroomun
nderthefloor.
whybandbeamslabwasnotchosenwasthefacttthatpenetrrationsthebeamsfor
Themajorreasonsw
designwhereelargeductssarelocated
d
largeductsaredifficculttohandlee.Thisisanissuewitharrchitecturald
bwerentchosenbecausseofthehigh
hformworkcostsandlow
wfirerating.
ontheggroundfloor..Ribbedslab
orecommend
dedthatmixxturesofposttensionandreinforced
dslabsareussedforthegroundfloor.
Itisalso
InAppen
ndix1,locatiionswhererreinforcedslaabsareused
dareduetotthislocationhavinganin
ncrease
numberofvarietyonthedimensionsofslab
bsizes.Thisw
wouldmeanitwillbeeassiertoconstrruct
mplermetho
odofstrengttheningandconstruction
nofconcrete
e.
reinforcedconcreteinthisareaduetoitssim
uipmentand
dmaterialssiinceitson
Reinforccedconcreteeisalsomoreecosteffectiiveintermsoflabor,equ
groundffloorandnottheupperllevels.
11
1
Figu
ure3FlatP
Plate
(CCAA,2
2003)
3.4.2 Flat S
Slab
Aflatslaabisaonew
wayortwow
waysystemw
withthickeningsintheslaabatthecolumnsandlo
oadbearing
walls(drroppanels)((Cement&C
ConcreteAsso
ociationofA
Australia,200
03).Thesedrroppanelsreeducethe
affectso
ofpunchingsshearandbeendingstresssesthereforeeathinnerslabcanbeused.Anexam
mpleis
shownin
nFigure4.
12
2
Figu
ure4Flatslab
(CCA
AA,2003)
3.4.3 Recom
mmendatio
on
nthebuildin
ngsconstructtion.Botharresimpleto
Bothfloorsystemsaaremorethaanadequatetobeusedin
ndertheslab
bwhichmeaansmoreheightinbetweeenfloors.H
However
formworkandhavenobeamsun
headvantageesanddisad
dvantagesinAppendix2tthemostsuiitablefloor
afteranalyzingandccomparingth
wouldbetheeflatplateo
onlybecausethedroppanelsinthefllatslabsyste
emmayinterrferewith
systemw
servicesofthefloorss.
Nonetheelesseventh
houghtheflaatplatesysteemisrecomm
mendedamoreintensiveestructuralaanalysisis
neededtobeunderttakentoenssurethereisnopunchinggshearissues.Thishoweeverisquicktorectifyif
omesanissu
ue.Posttenssionslabsforrtheselevelsswillbeused
dduetobetterconstrucctioncosts
thisbeco
andotheeradvantageesoverreinfforcedconcreetewhichwasexplained
dearlierinth
hissection.
Ithasbeeendecidedthatapostttensiondesiggnedslabwithaslabthiccknessof220
0mmwhenttakingthe
imposed
dloadas3kP
Pa,asseenin
nthegraphinAppendix 2,willbechosen.
designisdoesnotpassthestructuralcheckstheneitheraflatslabdesignbeusedorshear
strengtheningofthecolumnsisimplemented.
Ithasbeendecidedthataposttensiondesignedslabwithaslabthicknessof240mmwhentakingthe
imposedloadas5kPa,asseeninthegraphinAppendix2,willbechosen.
14
Level
1.2G+1.5Q
PlantRoom
714840
200
858108
Level3
565656
120
678967.2
Level2
565656
120
678967.2
Level1
565656
120
678967.2
GroundLevel
627816
160
753619.2
BasementB1
497280
100
Table3:DeadandLiveLoads
Column TributaryArea
31
61
32
24
33
32
34
62
35
65
36
30
37
20
38
43
39
46
40
19
596886
15
Vdes,=Vr*Md*Mz,cat*Ms*Mt
VRisfoundwithinsection3,Table3.1.BrisbaneisshowntobeinregionB.Calculatingfor
serviceability,V500isused.ThetableprovidesavalueofVR=57
Mdisfoundwithinsection3.3.2.Avalueof0.95isusedforcalculatingshearforcesandbase
overturningmoments.
MSandMTarepresumedtobeavalueof1.
Mz,catvalueisdeterminedbytable4.1(A).Withtheinformationprovided,itisknownthatwe
areinTerraincategory3.TheMz,catvaluechangesforeachfloorlevel.Forheightvalues
inbetweentheonesprovidedinthetable,alinearrelationshipisimplied.
Usingtheinformationabove,Vsit,canbecalculatedby57*0.95*Mz,cat.Allresultsareshownwithinthe
excelspreadsheetpreviouslymentioned.
WindPressureisdeterminedbythefollowingformula:p=0.6*Vdes,^2*Cfig*Cdyn.Thefollowingare
known:
air=1.2
Cdyn=1
AllKfactors=1
Therefore,thewindpressurevalues(p)canbecalculatedforeachfloorandareshownintheexcel
spreadsheet.
ThenextstepoutlinedwithinthestandardsistocalculateCfig.TocalculateCfig,theCp,evaluesforboth
thewindwardandleewarddirectionsneedtobedetermined.Thesevaluesareshownintables5.2(A)
and5.2(B)respectively.Cp,eforwindwardis0.7and0.5forleeward.Sincethewindwardwallisthe
worstcasesituation,itisusedtocalculatethecriticalpressureforeachlevel.Combinedpressurefor
eachlevelcanthenbecalculatedbymultiplyingcriticalpressurebycombinedCfig.Lateralforceoneach
levelcanthenbecalculatedbymultiplyingthecombinedpressureofeachlevelbytheareaofthelevel.
ThefinalsresultsareshowninTable4below:
16
Level
GL
1stFloor
2ndFloor
3rdFloor
P
(kPa)
1.86
2.11
2.33
2.54
LoadWidth(m)
4.425
3.75
3.75
4.375
Length(m)
A(m^2)
51
225.675
51
191.25
51
191.25
51
223.125
F=Sum(PzAz)
PzAz(kN)
418.836341
403.022593
445.418132
566.284281
1833.56
Table4:LateralForceonEachFloor,F
AS1170.42007:EarthquakeactionsinAustralia
Section2.2DesignProcedure
(a)Importancelevel
(b)Probabilityfactor(kp)&hazardfactor(Z)
(c)Whetherdomesticstructure
(d)Sitesubsoilclass
(e)Earthquakedesigncategory(EDC)
(f)DesigninaccordancewithSection5.
TheearthquakeloadingswerecalculatedusingMicrosoftExcelandcanbeviewedintheAppendix3.
Theimportancelevelwasdeterminedtobe2andtheprobabilityandhazardfactorsweredetermined
fromtablesinAS1170.4.Theannualprobabilityofexceedance(P)was1/500sofromTable3.1itwas
determinedtheprobabilityfactoris1.Fromtable3.2,theBrisbanehazardfactorwasdeterminedtobe
0.05.
ItwasassumedthatthesoilclassisBeRockbecausethecoresaresupportedbyrock.Thenextstepin
thedesignprocedureistoperformtheEDCIIStaticCheck.Sincetheheightofthebuildingislessthan
15meters,theFiformulamustbeused.ThecoefficientscanallbedeterminedusingAS1170.4except
fortheseismicweightofthestructureateachlevelwhichiscalculatedusingthefollowingformula:Wi=
Gi+cQiwherecis0.3.Thedeadandliveloadsarecalculatedinothersectionsofthereport.
Fiiscalculatedforeachindividuallevelandarealladdedtogethertodeterminethebaseshearthat
needstobedesignedfor.Thebaseshearforthisbuildingcametoatotalof1370.16kN.
17
5.0 De
etailed Sttructure Design
5.1 Po
ost Tensio
on
As previiously discusssed in Section 3.3, a posttensioneed slab would be an appropriate ch
hoice for the
e
North/W
Westsideoftthebuilding..Thetwostrripsdesigned
dforcanbevvisuallynoteedinFigure5
5.Theirgridss
areX15
5andY15.
Figure1d
design
Figu
ure5DesiggnStrips
oingsomebaasiccalculatiions,theinittialslabdeptthwascalcu
ulatedtobe 150mm.Assketchofthe
e
Afterdo
tendonprofilecanb
beseeninFiggure6.Forth
hespreadsheeetcalculatio
ons,seeApp
pendix4.1.
Figure6Tendo
onProfile
18
8
Theverrticalpointssofcontrafflexturefor span1is104mm,span2and3is59mm,an
ndspan4iss
92mm. These vallues assisteed in calcu
ulating the drape heights which in turn assisted in
n
whatspacingg.
calculattingthestraandsrequireedandatw
TheImm
mediatelossseswereccalculatedttobe25.4%
%andthelo
ongtermlo
osseswere 15.9%(see
e
Append
dix 4.1). Ho
owever, forr ease of caalculations they were rounded to
t 20% totaal and 10%
%
immediiate.Ifthe truelosses wereused
d,itwouldrreducethe JackingForrceandintturnreducee
theload
dsonthesslab.Thusin
neffect,byyusingthe roundedvaaluesitisusingahigherfactoroff
safety.
Afterkn
nowing thee spacing off the tendo
ons, load caases can be found. The
ese load caases includee
deadlo
oad,superim
mposeddeaadload,liveloadand prestressin
ngforces.TThese casesswerethen
n
runthro
oughtheprrogramSpaceGass.
utputs of th
he program
m gave the action forrce for ben
nding, sheaar and defllections forr
The ou
ultimate,serviceab
bility,andattransfer/h
hogging.Afttercheckinggthattheccapacitiesandstrength
h
oftheb
beamareOK,thefollow
wingsummariescanbe
emade;
32MP
Paconcrete
412.7
7diastrandssat2mcentres
Largestdeflectio
onis7.46mm
m
MomentCapacitty=54kNm
UltimateBendinggStrength((Mu)=35.8
8kNm
Pointofconcreteecrushingaattransfer==2551kN
Ultimate Shear Strength is 146kN; Ultimate
ShearratTransferis108kN.
Noad
dditionalreiinforcementisrequired.
19
9
5.2 Re
einforced Concrete
Figgure7Rein
nforcedconccretetransfe
erbeam
5.2.1 Slab S
Support Sysstem
Theslab
bwillbesupp
portedbytw
wowaybandbeams1200
0mmwidean
nd250mmthick,witha2
200mmslab
ontop.TThisexceedssthesuggesttionsfromSeection3.3an
ndAppendix2.Theanalyysedbeamishighlighted
inFiguree7.Thetwowaybandbeamswillbeeattachedto
otwowayslaabswhicharrestrongerthanone
wayslab
bsanddontdeflectasm
much.Theyhavepotentiaaltorsionalcrackingduetothetwow
waybending
momenttsandthisw
willrequirem
momentresisstingreinforccementinbo
othdirectionsasshowninAppendix
4.2(b)..
20
0
Thebendingmoments,Mx*andMy*,are51kNmand35kNm,respectively.Thedistributionofmoments
throughtheslabiscoveredinAppendix4.2(b).
Themaximumnegativemomentis2743kNmatnode3oftheSpaceGassprintoutandtheshearforceat
thatpointis1017kN.Themaximumpositivemomentis1870kNmatthepointwiththecolumnabove
andtheshearforceatthispointis3912kN.ThespreadsheetandSpaceGassprintoutareshownin
Appendix4.2.
Theslabthicknessis200mmandthebeamis1200mmwideand250mmdeep.Thecoverforfire
resistanceof120minutesis50mmwhichisaccountedforinthecalculations.Themaximumdeflection
was25.9mmatthegroundfloorcolumn.Creep,shrinkageandcrackingarealsotakenintoaccount.The
reinforcementrequirementsareN12barsat110mmspacing(onelayer)forbothdirectionsintheslab,
20N36barsat110mmspacing(twolayers)forthetopofthetransferslab,and20N30barsat110mm
spacing(twolayers)forthebottomofthebandbeam.Themidspancalculationswereusedmostlyasa
referenceandtodoublecheckthatthemaximumswereattheMax.Neg.MomentandMax.Pos.
Moment.ThecalculationsanddrawingsareshowninAppendix4.2.
TheseareshowninAppendix4.2.
21
HeightZ(m)
16.35(L3)
12.6(L2)
8.85(L1)
5.1(G)
BaseShear
BaseMoment
Wind(AS1170.2)
WuE/N WuN/S
Earthquake(AS1170.4)
EuE/W
EuN/S
Fy
Fx
Fx(kN) Fx(kN)
Fx(kN)
(kN)
(kN)
Fy(kN)
466.35
566.28
623.7
187.11 187.11
623.7
366.81
445.41
373.23
11.96 11.96
373.23
331.91
403.02
244.03
73.2
73.2
244.03
344.92
418.83
129.19
38.75 38.75
129.19
1509.99 1833.54 1370.15 311.02 311.02 1370.15
16947.78 20573.6 17718.72 4055.4 4055.4 17718.72
Table5:WindandEarthquakeValues
Thefactorsthatneedtobeconsideredwhendesigningacorewallinclude:
LocalDesignofCoreWalls
DesignLoadPerMetreofWall,N*
DesignAxialStrengthofWallPerMetre
WorstCaseforShear
WorstCaseforBending
EstimateAsinBoundaryElements
EstimateforRemainingVerticalReinforcement
WorstCompressionStress
WorstTensionStress
Checksweredoneforeachcasewhenrequiredandthedesignpassedallchecks.Thefullcalculations
canbeviewedinAppendix5.1.Figure8showsthegeneralshapeofthedesignedcorewallalongwithits
boundaryelementsinthetopsection.
22
Figure8:CoreWaallDesign
23
3
6.2 Co
olumn Dessign
Generally,columnsp
pickupthevverticalloadssoneachfloorand,togeetherwithan
nylateralforces
ntothefootiing.Theload
dinthe
produceedbywindorearthquakee,eventuallyytransferallforcesdown
columnisminimumattheroofaandmaximum
oadiscarried
dbyboththeeconcrete
matfootinglevel.Thelo
barsofcolum
mn.Thecolum
mnsizehasd
designedtob
beconstantalltheway
andtheembeddedrreinforcingb
ooffromfoo
oting.
tothero
AS3600
0:2009Sectio
on10:DesignofColumnforStrength
handServiceeabilityarem
mostlyusediinthedesign
n
oftheco
olumninthissproject.TheClausesthisdesignuseedarelistedbelow:
Clause10.1.3.2ShortCo
olumn
Clause10.5.2Radiusofggyration
Clause10.1.2Minimumbendingmo
oment
Clause10.6.2.2Squashload
Clause10.7.1Limitationonlongitudinalsteel
Clause10.7.3Confinemeenttotheco
ore
oflongitudin
nalreinforcem
ment
Clause10.7.4Restrainto
pressionpoin
nt
Clause10.6.2.3Decomp
Clause10.6.2.5Balancepoint
Figurre9Colum
mnLayout
Theminimumandultimatemom
mentwereussedintheco
olumndesign
nareatLevel1(southern
nportionof
ding).
thebuild
24
4
Plantlevel 1
3750mm
L3
3750mm
L2
3750mm
L1
5100mm
GL
7500mm
7500mm
7500
7500mm
7500mm
7500
5954mm
Figure10SectionalElevationAlongGridX
Basically,thematerialpropertiesusedare40MPaofcompressivestrength(fc)and500MPaofyield
strength.Thecolumnsizeisassumedtobe500mmby500mmfortheloadcomputationoncolumnat
grid3X(internal).Beforecheckingthecolumnsizewhetheritisadequateforthedesignbyusingthe
ultimateloadandminimumandultimatemoment,thereareseveralelementsareneededfor
determiningtheultimateload,forinstantbandbeamsize,slabthickness,deadandliveload.Thefull
calculationsareprovidedinAppendix5.2.
Firstofall,therearegoingtobetwodifferentcolumnsizeswhichisonefortheinternalandedge
respectively.Fortheinternalcolumndesign,theloadoncolumnatgrid3xisperformedinthedesign
aswellasthefollowingresultsareusedtoplotthestrengthlineforcolumnsectionormomentand
interactiongraph.Theresultsusedtoplotthestrengthinteractioncurveareshownbelow:
25
Ultimateload,N*
3427kN
Minimummoment,M*min
43kNm
Squashload,Nuo
7898kN
Purebendingmoment,Muo 176kNm
Balancepoint,Nub
2619kN
Balancepoint,Mub
552kNm
Decompressionpoint,Nu
5311kN
Decompressionpoint,Mu
420kNm
Table6Strengthinteraction
Belowistheresultofthestrengthinteractioncurve:
GraphPoints
Xaxis
Yaxis
SquashLoadPoint
0
7898
DecompressionPoint(D)
420
5311
BalancePoint(B)
552
2619
PureBendingPoint
176
0
Table7Strengthinteractionresults
26
Figure11Columnstrrengthdiagraam
Mb
M*
71.393
32 kN.m
71.393
32 kN.m
Nu
740
00
Nu
444
40
0.85N
Nu
377
74
N*
3426.87
74
kN
kN
kN
kN
from
graph
0.85N
Nu>N*OK
K
Tablee7Column
nstrength
Therefore,theresulttofthestren
ngthinteracttioncurvesh
howsthatthecolumnsizzeiswithinth
hecurve
whichm
meansthecolumnsizeisadequatefortheminimu
umbendingmoment.Fu
urthermore,
reinforcementbarsaarealsoinclu
udedinthed
design,for500mmby50
00mmcolum
mnsize,wearregoingto
numbersofYY20barwhichistheprim
maryreinforcementasweellasusing50mmcover,sincethe
use12n
momentt,M*iswithinthestrenggthinteractio
ondiagramtthereforetheereisincreasecolumncaapacityby
secondaaryreinforcementisnotrequiredininternalcolumn.(RDH,pL.1)
27
7
50mm
12Y20
500mm
500mm
Figure12ColumnCrosssection
Forcolumnatgrid5x,thefirstattemptwasusing500mmby300mmcolumnsize,duetotheMbisout
oftheinteractioncurve;thereforefurtherincreasingcolumncapacityisrequiredbyincreasingcolumn
sizeandreinforcement.ThefinalresultisshownbelowandthefullcalculationisprovidedinAppendix
5.2.
28
ColumnStrength
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
0
Mb
M*
Nu
Nu
0.85Nu
N*
200
590.7
590.7
8000
4800
4080
1756
400
600
800
1000
1200
kN.m
kN.m
kN
fromgraph
kN
kN
kN
0.85Nu<N*NOTOK
Figure13andTable8Columnstrength
Hence,weincreasedthesizeto600mmby450mmaswellasincreaseprimaryreinforcementand
secondaryreinforcementtoenhancethecolumncapacity.Theresultsareshowninthespreadsheetin
Appendix5.2.Thecoveris50mmandwillbeusing10N28.Thesectionviewofthereinforcementdetail
isshowninFigure14.
10N28
600mm
450mm
Figure14ColumnCrosssection
29
Initialestimatesofthetotalcostofthebuilding,forthepurposeofdeterminingthemaximumpossible
designfeeisrequired.However,thispartoftheprojectdiscussesthesubstructuredesignsothetotal
costsofallbelowgroundworksisgiveninthisreport.TherelevantRawlinsonextractsweretakenand
putintoaMicrosoftExcelspreadsheetinordertodeterminethetotalsubstructurecosts.Thetotal
costswascalculatedtobe$6,629,238.11(seeAppendix6)andtheprocesstodeterminethisfinal
amountisshownbelow.
7.3 Costs
7.3.1 Parking
TherewillbetwolevelsofundergroundparkinginthismultistoreyconcretebuildingcalledB1andB2.
Theareaforeachlevelwascalculatedtobeapproximately1500meterssqperlevel.Thereinforced
concreteconstruction,includingdeskover,mechanicalventilation,firesprinklersandlandscapingtotop
ofdeckforeachlevelis$1417.5persqmetersotheoverallcostsperlevelwascalculatedtobe$2126
250.Thereforethetotalcostsforparkingconstructionis$4252500.Itisassumedthattheexcavation
costsareincludedinthesecosts.
7.3.2 External Walls
Theareasoftheexternalwallswerecalculatedtobe580meterssqoneachlevelasmentionedbefore.
Fortheinsituconcretewalls,25MPareinforcedconcretewallsformedinClass4formworkand
30
reinforcedattherateof100kg/cummeterwereusedandtheywereselectedtobe150mmthick.The
totalcostingfortheseinsituconcretewallscametoatotalof$852600forallfivelevels.Theformwork
itselfdonetoonefaceinClass2costed$13746perlevelandthetotalcostingcametoatotalof$68
730.Thisisreinforcedbyincreasingthewallthicknessby25mmforevery10kgrcum.
Surfacefinishesandappliedfinisheswerethefinalstepsfortheseexternalwalls.Thewallsneedtobe
acidetchedwhichinvolvesallowingthereactionofadilutesolutionofhydrochloricacidtotheconcrete
surface,thenrinsingoffwithwater.Theacidchemicallyreactswiththesurface,dissolvingitand
allowingitandotherwatersolublecontaminantstobewashedaway.Totalcostsforacidetchingcame
to$104400.Cementrenderingtoonefacealsoneedstobecompletedandthiswillcostatotalof$130
500.
7.3.3 Concrete Work
Concreteneedstobedeliveredtothesitebeforeanyworkcancommence.Todeterminehowmuch
concretewasneeded,thetotalvolumeofslabs,columnsandpilesperlevelwascalculated.Itwas
determinedthatitwouldbemostcosteffectivetouse32MPaconcretewhichcosts$142percubic
meter.Thereforethetotalcostingforconcreteneededatthesitecametoatotalof$372992.82.
Thevolumeoffoundationbeamsandingroundstripfootingswerecalculatedintheexternalwalland
foundationssectionabove.Thesevolumeswerethenjustmultipliedbythepricepercubicmeterof
eachcomponentand25MPareinforcedconcretewasselectedasthiswouldbethemostcosteffective.
Thetotalscostsoffoundationbeamscameto$2656.6andthetotalcostsforthestripfootingscameto
$44820.
Finally,theconcreteworkforsuspendedslabs,stairsandfillingmustbeaddressed.Itwasdecidedto
use150mmthicksuspendedslabsthatcost$219percubicmeter.Thetotalcostsforalllevelscametoa
totalof$492750asitwascalculatedthatthevolumeofeachslabisapproximately300meterscubed
perlevel.Itwasassumedthatthevolumeofstairsforeachvolumeis50meterscubedandthepriceper
cubicmeteris$265.Thereforethetotalcostsforstairscameto$92750forthewholebuilding.The
piersneedfillingforthissubstructureandareonlyinthebottomtwobelowgroundlevels.Thetotal
costsforthepierfillingcameto$176610.
31
8.0 References
CementandConcreteAssociationofAustralia.2003.GuidetoLongSpanConcreteFloors.
http://www.concrete.net.au/publications/pdf/Longspan%20Floors.pdf(accessedbetweenMay10andMay20,
2011).
AustralianStandards.2002.AS/NZS1170.1:2002.
http://www.saiglobal.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/online/Script/OpenDoc.asp?name=AS%2FNZS+1170%2E1%3A
2002&path=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Esaiglobal%2Ecom%2FPDFTemp%2Fosu%2D2011%2D05%2D22%2F8638031
145%2F1170%2E1%2D2002%28%2BA2%29%2Epdf&docn=AS926477837210(accessedMay14,2011).
AustralianStandards.2011.AS/NZS1170.2:2011.
http://www.saiglobal.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/online/Script/OpenDoc.asp?name=AS%2FNZS+1170%2E2%3A
2011&path=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Esaiglobal%2Ecom%2FPDFTemp%2Fosu%2D2011%2D05%2D22%2F8638031
145%2F1170%2E2%2D2011%2Epdf&docn=AS0733798054AT(accessedMay15,2011).
AustralianStandards.2007.AS/NZS1170.4:2007.
http://www.saiglobal.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/online/Script/OpenDoc.asp?name=AS+1170%2E4%2D2007&p
ath=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Esaiglobal%2Ecom%2FPDFTemp%2Fosu%2D2011%2D05%2D22%2F8638031145%2F
1170%2E4%2D2007%2Epdf&docn=AS073378349XAT(accessedMay16,2011).
AustralianStandards.2009.AS36002009.
http://www.saiglobal.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/online/Script/OpenDoc.asp?name=AS+1170%2E4%2D2007&p
ath=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Esaiglobal%2Ecom%2FPDFTemp%2Fosu%2D2011%2D05%2D22%2F8638031145%2F
1170%2E4%2D2007%2Epdf&docn=AS073378349XAT(accessedMay17,2011).
32
9.0 Appendices
33
34
35
36
38
39
42
43