Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sumant B. Patel
Inertia Forces
Floor Slab
Foundations
Soil
Earthquake Shaking
BASE SHEAR
VB = AhW
Where, Ah =Horizontal Seismic Co-efficient (Explained in subsequent slides) W =Seismic weight of the building
It is a factor to obtain the design spectrum depending on the perceived maximum seismic risk characterized by Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) in the zone in which the structure is located. The basic zone factors included in this standard are reasonable estimate of effective peak ground acceleration.
intensity and magnitude lies in the fact that magnitude of an earthquake is determined based on measuring the ground motion with instruments (seismographs), whereas the intensity of an earthquake is determined based on observations of earthquake effects on building structures and human perceptions.
Near
For example, Canada's largest historic earthquake, the Queen Charlotte Island earthquake of August 22, 1949 was characterized with magnitude 8.1 on the Richter scale. The same earthquake was characterized with MMI intensities ranging from III to over VII, as illustrated in the gure in next slide.
As an illustration of MMI intensity of VII or higher in the area close to the epicenter of this earthquake "cows were knocked off their feet, and a geologist with the Geological Survey of Canada working on the north end of Graham Island could not stand up. In Prince Rupert (MMI intensity VI), "windows were shattered and buildings swayed."
It depends on types of Soil and time period of the building. e.g. : Hard Soil (Rocky) , Medium Soil and Soft Soil
CENTRE OF MASS
The point through which the resultant of the masses of a system acts. This point corresponds to the centre of gravity of masses of system.
CENTRE OF MASS
10m
4m
20 kN/m2
I
10 kN/m2
II
8m
A
20m
III
Let origin be at point A, and the coordinates of the centre of mass be at (X, Y) Total mass = M1 + M2 + M3 = 20x10x4 + 10x10x4 + 10x20x4 (Weight) = 800 + 400 + 800 = 2000kN CoM = (9.0, 6.8) X = (800x5 + 400x15 + 800x10) / (2000) = 9.0 m
CENTRE OF STIFFNESS
system acts.
CENTRE OF STIFFNESS
10m
2 1m
4m
2.8m
8m
A
A B
20m
Let Column stiffness about X-direction is 4k and about Ydirection is k Therefore, k1 = k2 = 3k and kA = kB = kC = 8k
CENTRE OF STIFFNESS
10m
2 1.47m
4m
8m
A
A B
20m
k1 = 3k, k2 = 6k
kA = kB = 8k, kC = 5k Eccentricities X = (8k x 10 + 5k x 20) / ( 8k + 8k + 5k) = x8.57m e = 0.43m Y = (6k x8) / ( 3k + 6k) = 5.33m ey = 1.47m
and
Twist
(b) Three-storey building Even if vertical members are placed uniformly in plan of building, more mass on one side causes the floors to twist.
Rope swings and buildings, both swing backand-forth when shaken horizontally. The former are hung from the top, while the latter are raised from the ground.
Wall
These columns are more vulnerable Vertical members of buildings that move more horizontally sustain more damage.
(c) Buildings with walls on two/one sides (in plan) Buildings have unequal vertical members; they cause the building to twist about a vertical axis.
SHEAR WALL
RC Walls
Shear wall is a stiff element and attracts more forces. Ideally, Shear wall should be on the periphery.
Plan
Foundation
RC Shear Wall
Reinforced concrete shear walls in buildings an excellent structural system for earthquake resistance.
SHEAR WALL
20m
B
8m
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
SHEAR WALL
20m
B
8m
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
F = 100 kN k1 = k7 = 120k , k2 = k3 = = k6 = 8k
ki = 2 x 120k + 5 x 8k = 240k + 40k = 280k F1 = (120/280) x 100 = 42.86 kN , F2 = (8/280) x 100 = 2.86 kN
A FIELD EXAMPLE
CONFIGURATION
If we have a poor conguration to start with, all the engineer can do is to provide a band-aid improve a basically poor solution as best as he can. Conversely, if we start-off with a good conguration and reasonable framing system, even a poor engineer cannot harm its ultimate performance too much.
Henry Degenkolb, Earthquake Engineer ,USA
CONFIGURATION
(a) Simple Plan ::good (a) too tall (c) too large in plan
Buildings with one of their overall sizes much larger or much smaller than the other two, do not perform well during earthquakes.
(b) Corners and Curves :: poor (c) Separation joints make complex plans into simple plans Simple plan shape buildings do well during earthquakes.
CONFIGURATION
(a) Setbacks
(e) Discontinuing Structural Members Sudden deviations in load transfer path along the height lead to poor performance of buildings.
POUNDING
Pounding can occur between adjoining buildings due to horizontal vibrations of the two buildings.
Fus e
d = 1 + 2
(a)
Short Column
Regular Column
Tall Column
Sloped Ground
Shor t
Long Portion of column restrained from moving Tall Column: Attracts smaller horizontal force
Short columns are stiffer and attract larger forces during earthquakes this must be accounted for in design. Short columns effect in RC buildings when partial height walls adjoin columns the effect is implicit here because infill walls are often treated as non-structural elements.
0.6m
3 m
Source: Wakabayashi,M., Design of Earthquake-Resistant Buildings, McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, USA
Effective height of column over which it can bend is restricted by adjacent walls this short-column effect is most severe when opening height is small.
REFERENCES
1) IS:1893 (Part1) 2002 2) Earthquake Tips, IIT Kanpur and BMTPC -New Delhi 3) British Columbia Institute of Technology
http://commons.bcit.ca/civil/students/earthquakes/ unit1_03.htm
THANK YOU