Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AGENDA
Introductions
Rules of the Road Meeting Goals Project History What We Considered
PROJECT HISTORY
Turkey Thicket Park
Included in DPR Play-DC Initiative for outdoor space upgrades during 2013. Design concept by Studio 39 developed in December 2012 based on community input.
N
BROOKLAND COMMUNITY MEETING MARCH 23, 2013
PROS:
Potentially more space for surface parking School has closer and easier access to playing fields
Shifting of park amenities provides a more flexible design School has proper classroom orientation for natural light and energy efficiency Shared school facilities provides for expansion of recreation center through shared use of amenities
CONS:
DPR 2013 Play DC park upgrades delayed until 2014 Potential increase in traffic along 10th St Park areas will be closed at times for school building construction Secure access point required between school population and rec center population Increased project budget due to demolition and rebuild of interior and exterior rec center amenities Areas within rec center will require temporary closure to construct reconfiguration & connection to school
BROOKLAND COMMUNITY MEETING MARCH 23, 2013
PROS:
School in close proximity to rec center to provide access to amenities Provides physical separation between school and rec center Students have easy access to playing fields School has better access to light and views School entrance on less active street
CONS:
Less green space available for park use Additional exterior park facilities are involved in large construction project requiring extensive periods of closure for construction Project budget must be increased to demolish and rebuild outdoor rec areas and address site topography
BROOKLAND COMMUNITY MEETING MARCH 23, 2013
PROS:
School located at civic end of site
School has ideal classroom orientation for natural light and energy efficiency Parking lots centrally located for possible shared use during non-school hours Provides physical separation between school and rec center School location is closer to Metro
CONS:
Outdoor park space is reduced with less flexibility for outdoor space design and layout North end of site has topography changes which poses issues and additional costs for constructing playing fields All exterior park facilities are involved in the construction project, requiring extensive periods of closure for construction
Project budget must be increased to demolish and rebuild outdoor rec areas and address site topography
BROOKLAND COMMUNITY MEETING MARCH 23, 2013
PROS:
Additional open space added between school and tennis courts Provides physical separation between school and rec center Additional space available for parking or play-space Minimal impact to 2013 Play-DC upgrades School has civic presence on Michigan Ave
CONS:
No Drop-off to offset street traffic on Mich. Ave. School constructed in close proximity to smaller scale houses
PROS:
School pickup and drop off drive helps alleviate traffic problems on streets Rec center would not experience any construction related closures School construction will have little impact on park and rec center Provides separation between school and rec center School has civic presence on Michigan Ave School can be built with budgeted funds
CONS:
Limited site area available for surface parking School building abuts tennis courts and enclosure fence
Next Steps
Posting of the presentation on the DGS website Collect additional comments from this presentation DGS to make recommendation to DPR and DCPS DGS, DPR and DCPS make final decision Next community meeting (Notification of Decision)