You are on page 1of 18

Chapter 6

Buckling of columns
4 Full lectures.
Buckling is a stability problem
Buckling of centrally loaded column with simple supports
Found buckling loads
Did the same for more complex supports
Eccentric loads not a stability problem
Briey looked at more complex supports
Found maximum stress in an eccentrically loaded beam (secant formula)
32
Buckling is one of the most common modes of failure in structural engineering. In this
course we will look at buckling of columns only
1
. Buckling is an interesting problem
because it is a stability problem and stability problems are always interesting(!). This is
because they involve solutions to dierential equations that infer serious changes to the
system. For example, when we have two adjacent streams of uid owing at dierent
speeds, an unstable shear layer forms and the two streams eventually mix (see gure 6.1).
FAST
SLOW
Figure 6.1: Mixing layer: the top half of the uid is moving faster than the lower half.
The dye released at the centreline shows that the ow is stable for a while, then the ow
becomes unstable and develops those beautiful patterns. When things go unstable, it is
usually beautiful for a little while then the system can explode and turn ugly!
This is the same for a column. It will go unstable as we will see. When unstable it has
nice sinusoidal buckling modes, but in reality, those modes will last for a brief time before
the column will collapse.
Before we look at real columns, let us try to understand the concept of buckling as a
stability problem. To this end, we will investigate a simplied column consisting of two
rigid beams with simple supports, joined together with a torsion spring as shown in the
gure below. The torsion spring has a spring constant of
R
which relates the torsion (or
moment) ot the angle of rotation via M = 2
R
(the 2 in this formula is needed when
is dened as in gure 6.2, i.e., when the spring is loaded equally from both ends). The
free body diagram in gure 6.2 allows us to write the bending moment balance,

M = 0 = M P, (6.1)
1
Buckling of thin plates is considered in many textbooks and is also an important design issue
33

P
L / 2
L / 2
P

P
M
Figure 6.2: Approximation to a loaded column. Two rigid beams (solid black) are joined
with a torsion spring, with rotational spring constant,
R
.
where is the horizontal displacement of the spring. For small angles, L/2 so that,
2
R
P
L
2
= 0
_
1 P
L
4
R
_
= 0. (6.2)
One solution is, of course, = 0. This means the structure is in equilibrium when = 0,
ALWAYS, REGARDLESS of P. The other solution is
P
cr
=
4
R
L
, (6.3)
which gives a value for the load which will cause an angular rotation other than 0. So,
there are three possibilities:
i. 0 < P < P
cr
: Stable equilibrium. i.e. no buckling at all.
ii. P = P
cr
: Neutral equilibrium.
iii. P > P
cr
: Unstable equilibrium. i.e. will buckle if perturbed.
Note that in all cases, the column will not buckle by itself. It will need a perturbation
(like a material imperfection, or a sieways bump) to buckle. This is true of all column
34
bending, although it is of no practical interest, since there will always be a perturbation
in a real system to cause buckling.
Let us know move on to a more realistic case: a continuous beam with length L, elastic
modulus, E, and moment of inertia, I. See gure 6.3. The free body diagram on the right
y
P
L
P
M
x
Figure 6.3: More realistic column under load P.
shows the case where the beam has deected by some amount, y. The moment balance
will show

M = 0 = M + Py
M = Py.
Using the well-known bending moment equation for small deection, y,
y

=
M
EI
=
P
EI
y,
we can write easily nd the dierential equation for buckling of a simply-supported col-
umn:
y

+
P
EI
y = 0. (6.4)
This equation is a second-order, homogeneous, constant-coecient, linear O.D.E. which
is easily solved.
35
Now we can see a major dierence between column loading and simple bending as shown
in gure 6.4. The bending moment for simple bending is only a function of x. This is the
orthogonal direction to the deection. Whereas, for the column, the bending moment is a
function of the deection, y. This gives a circular eect: as deection increases, bending
P
L / 2
x
P
x
M =
Px
2
(0 < x < L/2) M = Py
Figure 6.4: Comparison between column loading and bending.
moment increases, which increases the deection... seems like a pretty good description
of an UNSTABLE process.
Lets keep playing with equation 6.4: we replace P/EI with k
2
, so that our deection
O.D.E becomes
y

+ k
2
y = 0. (6.5)
First-year (second?) maths tells us the solution to such an equation is of the form
y = Asin(kx) + Bcos(kx), (6.6)
because k
2
> 0 (i.e., eigenvalues of equation 6.5 must be complex). A and B are found
from boundary conditions, which are
y(0) = 0 = Bcos 0 B = 0
y(L) = 0 = Asin(kL) A = 0 or kL = n. (6.7)
36
The second result is interesting. If A = 0, then we have the seemingly trivial case where
there is no deection. However, this is not trivial! It is, in fact, the opposite. It is the most
useful case where the column actually holds the load and doesnt buckle! Unfortunately
there is the other solution that says
k =
n
L
, n = 1, 2, 3, ...
_
P
EI
=
n
L
P =
_
n
L
_
2
EI (6.8)
Note that n = 0 otherwise P = 0 now that would be the trivial case. So what does
this last equation mean? P is just a load, right? The values of P given by equation 6.8
must be special. They are. If P is not equal to one of the solutions to equation 6.8, then
A = 0 and the column does not buckle as
y = Asin
nx
L
. (6.9)
So, when P is a solution to equation 6.8, A is unknown (could be anything) and, therefore,
in reality would become large so that the column fails. But there are lots (innite)
solutions to equation 6.8!
Since we now know P as a solution to equation 6.8 causes buckling, let us refer to these
solutions as critical loads,
P
cr
=
n
2

2
L
2
EI. (6.10)
When P > P
cr
the column buckles. These critical loads clearly increase as n increases, so
the lowest critical load is given by n = 1, the lowest possible value of n. This will be
P
cr
=

2
L
2
EI. (6.11)
Note that the value of n determines the mode of buckling. Equation 6.11 gives the
critical load for mode 1 buckling and the corresponding buckled shape is
y = Asin
x
L
. (6.12)
The mode shape of buckling is shown on the left-hand-side of gure 6.5 There are some
interesting points to raise now:
The critical load depends on EI and L
2
. Therefore, making a column longer will
decrease the resistance to buckling dramatically.
37
n = 2
P P
L / 2
n = 1
Figure 6.5: Mode 1 and 2 buckled columns. These will be the initial shapes the column
takes before failure (by cracking or yielding).
EI is exural rigidity. Increasing this parameter will help increase strength in
buckling. To increase I, move material away from the centroid from a cross-sectional
point of view as shown in the gure below.
Stronger materials buckle the same as weaker materials. Only stiness and shape
are important. i.e., a material that has a higher yield stress will not help strengthen
against buckling.
In reality, for a simply supported beam with no other constraints except those at the ends,
this will be the one and only mode of buckling. This is because once this load has been
exceeded (in reality) the column has failed and will not hold any more load in a useful
way. However, theoretically, if the load is higher than the critical load for rst mode
buckling, the column will not buckle unless the load reaches the second mode, n = 2:
P
cr
= 4

2
L
2
EI and y = Asin
2x
L
. (6.13)
This critical load is 4 times higher than the rst mode, so it would be good if we could force
our column to choose mode 2, rather than mode 1. Is this possible? Yes! If we physically
inhibit the column so mode 1 cannot occur (e.g. gure 6.6). Adding these supports at the
centre of the column is a simple way to increase the resistance to buckling. This is not
really surprising, however. All we have really achieved is to create two columns on top
38
6.1. COLUMNS WITH MORE COMPLEX SUPPORTS
n = 2
P
L / 2
Figure 6.6: A column that is supported at its centre so that it cannot buckle with mode
1 shape. Thus, mode 2 is the rst possible mode of buckling and the buckling load is 4
times higher than it would be without supports.
of each other, each with half the length of the original. i.e., we have eectively have two
half-length columns and we already knew that halving the length increases the critical
buckling load by 4 times. Interesting, nonetheless.
6.1 Columns with more complex supports
The previous section gave us the general steps to solving column problems:
1. Obtain experession for bending moment in the buckled state.
2. Solve dierential equation, EIy

= M.
3. Apply boundary conditions for y and y

.
39
6.1. COLUMNS WITH MORE COMPLEX SUPPORTS
6.1.1 Fixedfree
Let us rst consider the case of a xed support with free top essentially an axially
loaded cantilever as shown in gure 6.7. The free body diagram allows us to write down
P
L
P
L

P
P
y
A
M
L
Figure 6.7: A column that is supported at its centre so that it cannot buckle with mode
1 shape. Thus, mode 2 is the rst possible mode of buckling and the buckling load is 4
times higher than it would be without supports.
the moment balance to nd the bending moment in the column,

M
A
= M P + Py
M = P( y).
Again letting k
2
= P/EI, we get a dierential equation that looks like
y

+ k
2
y = k
2
. (6.14)
This is still a linear O.D.E, but it is no longer homogeneous. This is not really a problem
for Melbourne Uni engineers who are blessed with the innate ability to solve such equa-
tions. We simply add the homogeneous solution (equation 6.6) to the particular solution,
which is (you should be able to prove this easily) and end up with
y = Asin(kx) + Bcos(kx) + , (6.15)
40
6.1. COLUMNS WITH MORE COMPLEX SUPPORTS
where is the deection at the top of the beam as shown in gure 6.7. The boundary
conditions are a little more detailed as compared with the simple supports,
y(0) = 0 y

(0) = 0 y(L) = . (6.16)


Applying these gives
y(0) = B + = 0 B =
y

(0) = 0 A = 0
y(L) = = (1 cos(kL)) cos(kL) = 0
The last condition is the one that will tell us what the critical loads are. Clearly the
solutions to this equation are
= 0 and kL =
(2n 1)
2
, n = 1, 2, 3, ... (6.17)
The second solution reveals the critical load because k
2
= P/EI,
_
P
EI
L =
(2n 1)
2
corresponding mode shape y =
_
1 cos
_
(2n 1)
2L
x
__
. (6.18)
The rst mode is
y =
_
1 cos
x
2L
_
, (6.19)
which will occur if the load is greater than
P
cr
=

2
4L
2
EI. (6.20)
This load is 4 times less than the critical load for a simply supported column. That
means that a xed-free column is much weaker than the simply supported case. That is
pretty obvious, right? Now, there is something interesting here. If we look at gure 6.8, it
appears that mode 1 buckling of a xed-free column of length L, is identical to the mode
1 buckling of a simply supported column of length, 2L. In fact, if replace L with 2L in
the critical load for a simply supported column (n = 1),
P
cr
=

2
(2L)
2
EI =

2
4L
2
EI, (6.21)
so even the critical load is the same!
41
6.1. COLUMNS WITH MORE COMPLEX SUPPORTS
2L
L
P

P
Figure 6.8: Mode 1 buckling of a xedfree column. The right-hand gure shows this
column behaves like a simply supported beam of length 2L.
This brings us to the concept of eective length of a column, L
e
. For complex supports,
we can dene an L
e
such that we can use the simple support buckling load prediction
with L = L
e
, i.e.,
P
cr
=
n
2

2
L
2
e
EI, (6.22)
Furthermore, we dene a constant K such that L
e
= KL for the complex supported
column. In the case of xed-free supports, K = 2.
Again, there are more modes to consider. With the xed-free supports, the mode 2
buckling is quite interesting and is illustrated in gure 6.9. In this case, the mode 2
buckling load is,
P
cr
=

2
16L
2
EI, (6.23)
6.1.2 Fixedpinned suppport
The next example is a statically indeterminate load case. We do not need to know what
the reactions are if we are interested in buckling, so we will leave them as variables.
Figure 6.10 illustrates the problem. From a moment balance it is possible to show that
42
6.1. COLUMNS WITH MORE COMPLEX SUPPORTS
n = 2
L
P

L / 3
n = 1
Figure 6.9: Mode 1 and mode 2 buckling.
the bending moment anywhere along the column is
M = Py + R(L x). (6.24)
The dierential equation for buckled shape will then be
y

+ k
2
y = R(L x), (6.25)
which is really not much more complex than the xedfree problem (if you have to nd a
particular solution, then or R(Lx) are not much dierent in complexity). The result
is
y = Asin(kx) + Bcos(kx) +
R
P
(L x). (6.26)
With the boundary conditions
y(0) = 0 y

(0) = 0 y(L) = 0, (6.27)


we get the following relationships for A, B and R:
B +
RL
P
= 0, Ak
R
P
= 0 and Atan(kL) + B = 0. (6.28)
From these you can show that B = AkL so that the deection can be written as
y = A(sin kx kLcos kx + k(L x)) , (6.29)
and the last boundary condition given in equation 6.8 becomes
Atan(kL) = AkL
kL = tan(kL)
43
6.1. COLUMNS WITH MORE COMPLEX SUPPORTS
o
P
L
P
L
y
R
R
A
M
Figure 6.10: The xedpinned column. The right-hand gure shows the deection curve
as well as the reaction forces and moments.
which has a minimal solution of kL = 4.4934, giving minimum buckling load of
P
cr
=
2.046
2
L
2
EI. (6.30)
Thus, this support type is stronger than the simple support case. Again, this is pretty
obvious it is more supported. Finally, simple algebra gives us the eective length for
this support type:
L
e
=
1

2.046
L K = 0.699
6.1.3 Fixed-xed support
The nal support type we will consider is the xedxed case, where the column is rigidly
held at both ends. In this case, both supports support a moment as well as a reaction
force (although the reaction force at each support is zero owing to the symmetry of the
problem). It can be shown that the bending moment in the column is
M = Py + M
o
, (6.31)
44
6.2. COLUMNS WITH ECCENTRIC LOADS
L
P
L
P
Figure 6.11: The xedxed column. The right-hand gure shows the deection curve.
where M
o
is the reaction moment. By integrating the resulting dierential equation, we
arrive at a deection curve
y =
M
o
P
_
1 cos
_
2n
L
x
__
. (6.32)
It is, therefore, evident that L
e
= 0.5L for the xedxed conguration. That is, K = 0.5.
In summary of the complex supports analysis:
If K < 1, system is stronger than the simply suppported case. That is, it will buckle
under a higher load than the simply supported case.
If K > 1, the system is weaker than the simply supported case.
6.2 Columns with eccentric loads
We will now look at the case where a load is not centralised on the column. That is, the
load is oset from the neutral axis of the column by an amount, e. If you think about it, it
is very likely that real columns will experience such a loading case. Figure 6.12 illustrates
the problem. It is shown that an eccentric load, P, may be replaced with a centralised
45
6.2. COLUMNS WITH ECCENTRIC LOADS
y
M
o
M
o
L L
P
e
P
P
Figure 6.12: The eccentrically loaded column. The right-hand gure shows the deection
curve and end conditions.
load of the same magnitude with the addition of a moment, M
o
= Pe. With this new
conguration, we can easily nd the bending moment in the column:

M = 0 = M
o
+ P(y) M
M = P(e y)
From EIy

= M and k
2
= P/EI, you can show that
y

+ k
2
y = k
2
e. (6.33)
The solution to this equation is simply,
y = Asin(kx) + Bcos(kx) + e, (6.34)
which we can reduce using our boundary conditions:
y(0) = 0 = B + e B = e
y(L) = 0 = Asin(kL) e cos(kL) + e A = e tan
_
kL
2
_
. (6.35)
Since we all remember our half-angle identities, there is hardly any point in reminding (!)
that
1 cos x
sin x
= tan
1
2
x. (6.36)
46
6.2. COLUMNS WITH ECCENTRIC LOADS
Therefore, the deection of the column is given explicitly by
y = e
_
tan
_
kL
2
_
sin(kx) + cos(kx) 1
_
. (6.37)
Now see a big dierence between central loading and eccentric loading. That is, under an
eccentric load, a column ALWAYS deects in the manner described by 6.37. In contrast
to central loading, equation 6.37 has no unknown constants in it. This means that eccen-
trically loaded columns have no critical load and will fail by bending stresses exceeding
the yield stress of a material.
From equation 6.37 we can determine the maximum deection, which is simply
= y(L/2) = e
_
sec
kL
2
1
_
. (6.38)
Recall that k
2
= P/EI and that, if e = 0, the load that would buckle the column is
P
cr
/EI =
2
/L
2
. So we could rewrite k
2
as
k
2
=

2
L
2
P
P
cr
, (6.39)
which allows us to write the deection in terms of load
= e
_
sec
_

2
_
P
P
cr
_
1
_
. (6.40)
This is nice because the deection is a function of the load as a fraction of P
cr
and if
P = P
cr
then the eccentrically loaded column has surely failed.
6.2.1 Eccentric loading with more complex supports
This little section is added for completeness, since we looked at other supports for the
centrally loaded column.
Fixedxed: There can be no eccentric load in this case as both supports are rigid.
No matter where the load is applied, the rigid support will simply push evenly on
the whole column!
Fixedpinned: This is a little complicated... you need to go back to the bending
moments and nd deection O.D.E. again. You could show that the end result is,
y = e
_
tan
kL
2
sin kx + cos kx 1 + k tan
kL
2
(L x)
_
. (6.41)
47
6.3. MAXIMUM STRESS IN A COLUMN
Fixedfree: The situation is similar to the centrally loaded column. There we found
we could just replace L with 2L in all equations. You do the same for eccentric
loading.
6.3 Maximum stress in a column
When a column is eccentrically loaded, there are two components making up the maximum
stress,

max
=
P
A
+
M
max
c
I
. (6.42)
The rst is simply due to the axial load, while the second is due to the bending moment
in the column. Note that c is the distance from the neutral axis to the extreme edge of
the cross-section of the beam. M
max
will obviously occur where the deection is greatest,
which, for the simply supported column is at x = L/2 (the following applies to simply
supported column only). This maximum deection, is given by equation 6.40 and
M
max
= P + Pe
= Pe
_
sec
_
L
2
_
P
EI
_
1
_
+ Pe
= Pe sec
_
L
2
_
P
EI
_
= Pe sec
_
L
2r
_
P
EA
_
,
where r is the radius of gyration, dened by I = Ar
2
(A is the cross-sectional area).
Including this in the maximum stress calculation, we arrive at the famous Secant Formula:

max
=
P
A
_
1 +
ec
r
2
sec
_
L
2r
_
P
EA
__
. (6.43)
The eccentricity ratio is dened as ec/r
2
. It is a non-dimensional measure of the
eccentricity.
The slenderness ratio is dened as L/r.
When
max
exceeds the yield stress, the column fails (hopefully trivial).
48
6.3. MAXIMUM STRESS IN A COLUMN
Note that if e = 0, then failure occurs when P = P
cr
and

max
=
P
A
=

2
E
(L/r
2
)
. (6.44)
This is the absolute maximum stress possible in a centrally loaded column.
With these points in mind, gure 6.13 roughly illustrates the secant formula.
Figure 6.13: Curves of the secant formula for selected eccentricities.
49

You might also like