Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jennifer L. Wagner
Online Project Coordinator
What is a WIKI??
• With the availability of a wiki 24/7/365 from pretty much anywhere, you
have the opportunity to connect with anyone you wish....from your
classroom to the world.
• A wiki is as easy to use as any word processing program.
• It is free (most of the time) with the availability of adding text, images,
video, links, feeds, and more.
• It is editable but also you can trace the edits (or revisions) to see who has
added/subtracted data.
• You can select who you wish to collaborate with by invitation (which
allows security) or you can open it to anyone.
• You can roll back to prior edits if necessary.
• A simple SAVE updates the page instantly on the internet.
• Some people challenge the validity of "wikispaces" as a legitimate source.
By creating your own wiki, you are able to verify your data for accuracy
and create an accurate portal of information for your audience.
PB Wiki: http://pbwiki.com/education.wiki
Wikispaces: http://www.wikispaces.com/site/for/teachers
Media Wiki: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki
WetPaint: http://www.wetpaint.com/wiki?zone=cyoGoEdu2
Zoho:
http://wiki.zoho.com/jsp/wikilogin.jsp?serviceurl=%2Fregister.do
• http://educationalwikis.wikispaces.com/Examples+of+educational+wikis
• http://k12online07.wikispaces.com/
• http://davidwarlick.com/wiki/pmwiki.php
• http://www.budtheteacher.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
• http://salutetoseuss.wikispaces.com/
• http://chriscraft.pbwiki.com/
• http://globalexplorers.wikispaces.com/
• http://www.wikiineducation.com/display/ikiw/Home
• http://www.techlearning.com/story/showArticle.php?articleID=191801354
• http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7004.pdf
• http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0452.pdf
• http://homepage.mac.com/charlenechausis/wikis.html
Wiki Comparision
http://www.wikimatrix.org/
Wikipedia Concerns:
1. Wikipedia -- is inaccurate???
The British science journal Nature facilitated a study that examined the
comparative accuracy of scientific entries in Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia
Britannica in December of 2005. Nature found the two sources to contain a
similar amount of errors, with each having 4 serious errors relating to
misinterpretations of important concepts in the pairs of articles reviewed. A
considerable amount of minor errors were also found in Wikipedia and Britannica
according to Nature: "Reviewers also found many factual errors, omissions or
misleading statements: 162 and 123 in Wikipedia and Britannica, respectively.
(http://www.opsi.gov.uk/advice/poi/power-of-information-review.pdf pg 10)
That is not to say that you will not find valuable and accurate information in
Wikipedia; much of the time you will. However, Wikipedia cannot guarantee
the validity of the information found here. The content of any given article
may recently have been changed, vandalized or altered by someone whose
opinion does not correspond with the state of knowledge in the relevant fields.
(http://ig.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer)