Professional Documents
Culture Documents
, 2 ,1
4 ,3
(CB1, CB2&CB3)
(CB8, CB9 and CB10)
Group A
GroupD
Group
Parametric study
A
Specimen
CB1,CB2&CB3
CB8,CB9&CB10
Size of column
CB1&CB8
CB2&CB9
CB3&CB10
A
D
ACI 318-95
A
D
Cement
Fine Aggregate
Coarse Aggregate
(Sand)
Water/Cement
(Gravel)
Ratio
All
dimensions
mm.
in
Fusion Bonded Steel Bars
Epoxy Coated Steel Bars
Normal High Grade Steel Bars
(FS).
(ES).
(NS).
COLUMN
Type of coat
Stirrups
Stirrups
Type of coat
Longitudinal
FS
NS
ES
NS
FS
ES
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
8
NS
8mm
16mm
Longitudinal
Reinforcements
16mm
Depth
300mm
200 mm
Width
200mm
200 mm
8mm
Stirrups
Type of coat
NS
Bottom
16mm
3
CB10
Top
Reinforcements Cross-section
16mm
CB2
CB3
CB8
CB9
Depth
2
3
4
5
400mm
CB1
Width
SPECIMEN
Crosssection
200mm
SERIAL
BEAM
1.75
3.5
0.55
Strain Gauges
Linear Variable Displacement Transducer (L V D T)
Data Acquisition
80
Displacement (cm)
60
40
20
0
-20
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
-40
-60
-80
Cycle No.
(CB3)
Yield Displacement
Displacement
Specimens
y (cm)
y (cm)
y (cm)
at Failure
Compression
Tension
Considered
f(cm)
Groups
CB1
1.15
1.2
1.175
CB2
1.0
0.9
0.95
Load(tons)
Group
(A)
CB3
1.2
1.0
1.0
CB8
1.5
1.1
1.1
3.5
4
2
3.8
-60
-40
0
-2 0
-20
20
40
60
-4
3.6
-6
-8
Group
4.5
Displacement(mm)
1200
1.2
Stiffness
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1
11
13
15
17
Cycle No.
0
1
11
13
15
Cycle No.
Stiffness Degradation, (C B 1)
17
(D)
CB9
1.1
1.23
CB10
1.1
1.0
5
4
1.1
4.5
1.05
5.2
CB1
Displacement
Ductility
Factor
( f / y )
2.98
CB2
4.0
Load (tons)
Groups
Specimens
1
0
-0.01
-0.005
-1 0
0.005
-2
0.01
Group
(A)
0.015
Maximum
Drift Ratio
( f/L)
2.8
3.04
-3
-4
-5
6
6
0
-10
-5
10
15
20
25
30
-2
Load, (tons)
Load, (tons)
0
-10
-5
10
15
20
25
30
-2
-4
-4
-6
-6
-8
-8
Steel Strain,(
Steel Strain,(
Strain
,
Group
(D)
CB3
3.6
2.88
CB8
4.09
3.6
CB9
4.09
3.6
CB10
4.95
4.16
7
6
Crack Load
5
Load(tans)
Ultimat load
4
3
2
1
0
1
10
Fig.(13):Comparison between Ultimate Load and crack load for Different Specimens.
CB1,CB2&CB3
(CB8,CB9&CB10
(ACB3)
Load(ton)
Groups
Specime
ns
Compress
ion
side
Group
(A)
Tensio
Failure
Failure
cycle
Load(ton)
n side
CB1
6.557
6.846
15
4.338
CB2
5.717
5.558
15
3.512
CB3
6.56
6.85
15
3.204
CB8
4.323
4.07
15
2.95
CB9
4.087
4.024
15
3.022
CB10
3.812
4.027
17
3.153
Group
(D)
Load (tons)
Load (tons)
5
8
0
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
-2
2
1
0
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
-1
-2
-4
-3
-6
-4
-8
-5
Displacement (mm)
Displacement (mm)
CB1(F. S. Reinf.)
Stiffness
Stiffness
0.8
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
1
0
1
11
13
15
11
13
15
17
Cycle No.
17
Cycle No.
800
Energy Dissipation
(ton.mm)
Energy Dissipation
(ton.mm)
900
1000
800
600
400
200
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1
0
1
11
13
15
17
11
13
15
17
19
Cycle No.
Cycle No.
CB1(F.S.Reinf.)(col.30*30)
6
CB8(F.S.Reinf.)(col.20*20)
CB2(E.S.Reinf.)(col.30*30)
Load (ton)
CB9(E.S.Reinf.)(col.20*20)
CB3(N.S.Reinf.)(col30*30)
CB10(N.S.Reinf.)(col.20*20)
0
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
-2
-4
-6
-8
Displacement (mm)
280
1200
CB1(F.S.Reinf.)(col.30*30)
0.9
CB8(F.S.Reinf.)(col.20*20)
CB2(E.S.Reinf.)(col.30*30)
0.8
CB9(E.S.Reinf.)(col.20*20)
CB1(F.S.Reinf.)(col.30*30)
CB8(F.S.Reinf.)(col.20*20)
CB2(E.S.Reinf.)(col.30*30)
CB9(E.S.Reinf.)(col.20*20)
CB3(N.S.Reinf.)(col.30*30)
CB10(N.S.Reinf.)(col.20*20)
0.7
CB3(N.S.Reinf)(col.30*30)
800
Stiffness
Energy Dissipation
(ton.mm)
1000
CB10(N.S.Reinf.)(col.20*20)
600
0.6
0.5
0.4
400
0.3
0.2
200
0.1
0
0
1
11
13
15
17
19
Cycle No.
11
13
15
17
Cycle No.
IDARC
IDARC
325
60
40
8
Load (tons)
Load (tonS)
6
4
2
0
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
-2
-4
20
0
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
-20
Theoritical
-6
Experimental
-40
-8
Displacement (mm)
-60
Disblacement(mm)
(ANSYS)
ANSYS10
Experimental
Analytical
Results
Results
Specimens
Column
(20x20)
Pult (Ton)
Ana./Exp.
Pult (Ton)
ve
4.03
3.225
0.80
ve
3.81
3.125
0.82
(CB10)
(Comparison
Specimens
Analytical
Analytical
(ANSYS) /
Column
(20x20)
(CB10)
Results
Results
(IDARC)
(ANSYS)
Pult
Pult
(Ton)
( IDARC)
(Ton)
ve
5.75
3.225
0.56
ve
5.62
3.125
0.556
36
5
4
4
Experimental
Theoritical
2
1
0
-60
-40
-20
20
40
-1
-2
-3
-4
Displacement(mm)
60
Load(tons)
Load(tons)
-80
1
-60
-40
-20
0
-1 0
20
40
60
80
-2
-3
-4
-5
Displacement(mm)
(Analytical Hysteresis Loop Envelope of Load Versus Displacement, and
Comparison between Experimental and Analytical Results).
(IDARC) (ANSYS)
(Plastic
Hinge
slippage
Fusion Bonded Steel Bars
Epoxy Coated Steel Bars
(ANSYS)
6. References:
1- ACI-ASCE Committee 352, "Recommendations for Design of Beam- Column
Joints in Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Structures.", ACI Journal, Vol.82, No.3, MayJune 1995
2- A. J. Kappos, "Dynamic Loading and Design of Structures" Published by Spon
Press , London, 2003.
3- ASTM (1989),"Standard Specification for Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel
Bars,"(ASTM A 775M-89a) 1989 Annual
Book
for ASTM
6- Park, Y. J., Ang, A.-S., and Wen, Y.K., "Seismic Damage Analysis and DamageLimiting Design of R/C Building" Civil Engineering Studies, Technical Report No. SRS
516, University of Illinois, Urbana 1995.
7- Park, Y. J., Reinhorn A. M., Kunnath S. k., "IDARC: Inelastic Damage Analysis
of Reinforced Concrete Frame-Shear-Wall Structures" Technical Report NCEER-870008, State University of New York at Buffalo1998.