Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TOPICS COVERED
Changes in the advertising today as compared to the earlier days specially in
Television, the use of humor, the dotcom advertising.
OBJECTIVES
1. To view the changes in advertising today as compared to the earlier days.
2. To examine the different areas where this impact is felt like humor.
Ask any advertising professional who has been around long enough, and he’ll tell you
Indian advertising – advertising on television, especially – has undergone a significant
transformation over the past eight to 10 years. The execution has definitely got better,
we’re told. (Which is partly a function of the technologies available today.) And we’ve
gained yards in the ideas department too, they insist. Like how? Well, our commercials
are more engaging and clutter-breaking nowadays… and a lot funnier.
Yes, everyone agrees that we’re making more funny commercials today than we were a
decade ago. But does this across-the-board humour work, or does it only generate more
clutter? And even if one were not to debate the merits of humourous advertising, is this
the only change Indian television commercials have witnessed? What about a change in
communication formats, in and across product categories? What about changes in the
manner in which Indian brands tell product stories? Or changes in the use of mnemonics,
the use of ‘product windows’ and, say, the portrayal of women in Indian commercials?
Although perhaps less obvious, there have been changes in most of these components of
advertising, as revealed by a recent study – ‘The Non-fiction of Indian Advertising, 1993-
2001’ – conducted by FCB-Ulka Advertising. Sharing some of the findings of the study
with agencyfaqs! Richa Arora, vice-president – strategic planning, FCB-Ulka, says, “The
purpose behind the study was to see how exactly the content in Indian television
advertising has evolved from the early 90s. We all know there have been changes, but
little of that was quantifiable. This study shows that advertising seems to be acquiring a
certain sameness, and it also shows a startling scale of opportunity to do things
differently.”
As a starting point, the agency made a compilation of over 1,000 television commercials
from 1993 to 2001. These commercials were classified under eight category heads – Food
& Beverages, Personal Care, Household Durables, Lifestyle/Apparel/Fashion,
Automotive, Household Products, Pharmaceutical and Services. Each commercial was
then mapped onto various relevant dimensions of advertising where possible changes
could have occurred. These included the nature of storylines, the use of ‘Hinglish’ and
mnemonics, product windows, the use of humour, the type of protagonist, the nature of
payoffs (rational or emotional) and the portrayal of women.
“The agency did not use any criteria for selecting the advertised brands, nor did we do
any sort of filtering,” Arora informs, “We just took all the ads from TV Ad Indx’s
quarterly tapes from 1993 onwards. All we wanted was a single credible source, and I
believe these tapes are a broad representation of spends, as the ads in these tapes cover
70-to-80 per cent of spends in this country.”
The findings of the study are a mixture of the expected and the unexpected. Let’s first
take pure product-centric advertising… that is, commercials that tend to pan on the
product, 30 seconds on 30. In 1993, this kind of advertising constituted 24 per cent of all
commercials aired. However, by 2001, the figure had fallen to 11 per cent (which is 11
per cent too much, many creatives would groan). The study also shows that with a
decline in product-centric advertising, there was a fall in the number of ads with no
narrative storyline (from 51 per cent in ’93 to 29 per cent in 2000). The reading could be
that product-centric ads make less of a narrative, which, perhaps, affects their recall.
“In contrast, categories like Foods and Personal Care are using more and more rational
cues as support, be it Cadbury chocolates with ‘doodh ki shakti’ or the fruit vitamin-
based Poppins,” says the study. Explaining this, Arora says, “Automotive and Durables
have a status connotation, so the communication tends to become emotional. However,
one crème or one moisturizer is almost as good as another, so you need a rational
argument to push your case.”
Interestingly, the study notes that commercials having a ‘purely functional payoff’ (which
could range from product displays to commercials with a promise rooted in problem-
solution) have only marginally declined from 62 per cent in 1993 to 53 per cent in 2001.
“This is because, typically, communication for utility products, business products and
dotcoms has been, by and large, based on a functional payoff,” the study concludes.
“Examples of a pure functional payoff are more common than we think, be it the
Pepsodent ‘matka’ ad symbolizing ‘long-lasting germ fighting strength’, or Epson
printers offering ‘clarity’.” But what is most surprising is that today, ads with ‘testimonial
formats’ constitute just 4 per cent of all commercials. “It is more the lavish media spends
of the Vims, the Ariels and the Doves of the world that make testimonials seem more
common than they really are,” the study proffers an explanation.
Vis-à-vis the portrayal of women, the study reveals that, “While the rise in the portrayal
of women sans ‘typically traditional values’ was up from 55 per cent in 1993 to 79 per
cent in 2001, the change in their appearance was more marginal. The ‘modern look’ was
up from 48 per cent to 56 per cent.” The study also notes that, “The relatively more
conservative depiction of women is what typifies the F&B category. In 2001, F&B ads
portraying women with traditional values were 20 per cent, versus only 13 per cent across
other categories (a similar trend was apparent in 1993). It seems as if women in F&B ads
find greater favour in their ‘Annapurna’ roles even in modern times.”
Speaking about this facet of the study, Arora reveals that other studies done by FCB-Ulka
suggest that there is more outward (appearance-wise) change among Indian women and
less change in their traditional values. “What our studies have shown is that the package
has changed, but the core has not,” she says. “However, advertising seems to reflect the
opposite. The ‘look’ is one area where quite a change has happened, so it is surprising
that advertisers choose to keep the relatively conservative look, even today. There seems
to be, so to say, a gap between advertising and reality.”
During the time the Indian consumer was making a switchover from an auditory medium
(radio) to a visual one (television), radio jingles used to double to form the backbone of
commercials too. Remember ‘Washing powder Nirma’ and ‘Videocon washing
machine’? Well, nothing’s changed. Jingle-based ads were as high as 45 per cent in 1993.
In 2001, the figure is still at 43 per cent – when internationally, jingle-based ads
constitute around 2 per cent of the total. Adds weight to one professional theory that ours
is a culture tuned to the oral-auditory tradition.
One ‘common knowledge’ that the study corroborates pertains to the increase of humour
in Indian advertising. In 1993, only 28 per cent of all commercials were humour-based.
Today (2001), almost every second ad tries to tickle the funny bone – 46 per cent of all
ads are (or at least try to be) funny. “It’s almost a ‘humour herd’ out there,” says the
study. Of course, the idea is not to say ‘No’ to humour, especially if humour sells. “The
trick may lie in creating a distinct brand of humour within the genre, so that that humour
becomes a kind of a signature for the brand,” Arora points out. The way The Economist
uses ‘intellectual humour’, or the way Fox Sports uses exaggerated, absurd humour.
Arora admits that this is a “first-cut analysis” of the findings. “This was more to take a
macro look at the industry and the advertising we are doing,” she says. “Based on this,
we are now planning to study the more interesting constituents in greater detail… things
like ZEWS, testimonials, mnemonics. We will also now look at things at a category level,
and I am sure there will be valuable information we can unearth for our clients.”
Alaque Padamsee
The ad guru on what Indian advertising will be like in the new millennium
Ad guru Martin Sorrell once said the days are over for small and medium agencies
in India.
Everyone's selling out because survival's becoming tough. Smaller agencies do not count
any more.
All agencies have one standard complaint: Clients today ask for the moon.
I tend to agree. But there's also a continuous shakeout process.
The issue of `objectionable' ads on the telly has however once again pitchforked into the
limelight the need to have a separate body to monitor content on television channels on
the lines of the content bureau as envisaged in the still-pending Communication
Convergence Bill.
"We cannot always get involved in such things and the need for an outside body
monitoring content has again been made," a senior official of India's information and
broadcasting ministry told indiantelevision.com earlier today, emphasising that the notice
from the ministry to TV channels and also the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) on
ads of fairness cream and soaps is a stop-gap measure.
Three days ago, several TV channels got notices from the I&B ministry to take off the air
ads relating to products which claimed to lighten the colour of the skin after usage. The
move came after the All India Democratic Women's Association had petitioned the
government, a Left party dominated organisation, that such ads were biased against the
dark-skinned girl child.
Is this fair?
One such `objectionable' ad features two girl friends bantering amongst themselves how
the usage of two bars of soap of a particular brand for a period of eight weeks would
make one of them (dark skinned compared to her friend who is very fair) fair and lovely.
The dark-skinned girl takes up the offer, turns into a fair-skinned Cinderella and loses the
bet of Rs 20 (cost of soaps). The friend now, of course, does not want her boyfriend to
see her `lovely' friend closely.
There's more. In another ad, a girl is unable to land a handsome groom due to her dark
complexion, but her use of a fairness cream helps her hook a good looking guy. Another
has a girl who lands a job as an airhostess after using a fairness product and is able to
make up for her father's regret of not having a son to look after him
Fair enough?
"It is ads like these which can upset anybody. Are the companies trying to say that it is a
sin to be dark-skinned in a country like India (where a majority of the population are
various shades of brown)? Especially when even educated people pray for fair daughters
and daughters-in-law," the government official said, pointing out that in recent times
cases of girl infanticide too has increased alarmingly.
The government official also said that the TV channels have been given 14 days time to
take the necessary steps on the notice, including petitioning the government on it too.
"We understand that channels have business policies and taking off the air ads cannot be
done overnight. The IBF too has been asked to look into the matter and take steps to
expedite the matter," the official added. Fair enough?
VISA's joyride with Mr. Bond
West meets East seemed to be theme of VISA's much appreciated television commercial
starring the suave Pierce "Bond" Brosnan and Zhang
Ziyi, the svelte actress who portrayed the rebellious
martial arts exponent in the blockbuster Crouching
Tiger, Hidden Dragon with aplomb. The memorable
TV commercial for the Asia Pacific region was
created by VISA's ad agency BBDO.
The charming and enigmatic Brosnan seemed to be a
perfect foil to the the "wild" Zhang in the 60-second
nail-biting, action packed commercial. Of course, the
typical Bond brand of humour and the famed facial expressions which have become a
hallmark of Brosnan's Bond character are all there in this roller-coaster drive of an
advertisement. However, two things stand out and threaten to overshadow the superstars -
the 'tuk tuk' and its driver!
Advertising folklore has it that the TVC was shot
with over 200 crew, 100 extras and more than 100
cars and trucks to reconstruct a Chinatown setting
with markets and traffic jams. Realism at its best in
order to reflect the ethos and culture of the Oriental!
The commercial opens to the setting of a typical
street in the crowded city of Bangkok with Brosnan
caught in Bangkok's famous traffic jam. Brosnan is
racing against time to make it to his latest heartthrob
Zhang. He abandons his sleek limousine and hitches a ride with a tuk tuk driver. The
driver, who is an avid film watcher and a typical Bond fan, gets carried away with Bond's
on-screen persona. He embarks upon the "ride of his life" and the sophisticated Mr. Bond
has to tag along. Brosnan empathises with his bravado and decides to humour him by
joining in.
What follows is a nerve-wrecking journey along the
streets of Bangkok as the obsessed driver crashes
through billboards, restaurants and crowded markets.
The "duo" - should we include the tuk tuk and say
"trio" - leave a trail of destruction in their wake as
they traverse through the lanes, bylanes and streets -
not a trace of cemented avenues or four-lane
concretised roads. Mercifully, the journey comes to
an end and the debonair Brosnan is delivered to the
doorstep of his beloved - at least for the time being.
It is then that tragedy strikes! The tuk tuk falls apart
even as the driver and the urbane, refined and
polished Brosnan escape without a scratch - or
should we say "shaken but not stirred". The thorough
gentleman that he is, a grateful Brosnan whips out his
VISA card and offers to pay for the damages!
The commercial ends on a humourous note as
Brosnan discovers the tuk tuk driver waiting and
wooing him for another ride on his brand new turbo-
powered vehicle. The unbeatable gusto and charming
smile of the tuk tuk driver will remain etched in
memory for years. The punch line "All it takes" is
VISA!
The TVC conveys that life is full of
possibilities and the power to make
things happen lies in the hands of the consumer - with VISA to assist
the consumer. The advertisement highlights the versatility and power of
VISA and is in line with the global "All it takes" brand advertising
campaign. The advertisement exudes energy and confidence with bold
and distinctive images - representing the vitality of VISA.
VISA International's South Asia country manager Santanu Mukherjee
says: "We believe this advertisement will reinforce VISA's brand image
as a leader in India. By combining our international association with the James Bond
movie Die Another Day and bringing together international celebrities like Pierce
Brosnan and Zhang Ziyi, who have a strong appeal across Asia and India, we hope to
provide memorable and entertaining advertising. The advertisement aims at providing
extraordinary surprises to ordinary everyday situations like a traffic jam!"
An excellent script laced with humour, the
unmistakable charm of Brosnan and the rustic
simplicity of an "ordinary" human being being
elevated to sublime heights in the presence of an icon
has delivered another winner for the global brand!
Summary
In this short lesson we have tried to take a quick glance at : changes that are visible in the
advertising today as compared to the earlier days specially in Television, the increasing use
of humor in commercials and the dotcom advertising.
Assignments
1. What do you think are the Indian advertising trends today? How does it differ from the
earlier times? Write a note with examples.