BA Hons Dance Performance 2009-10

Assessment feedback Collaborative PracticesDevised Performance- Body Project Student: Konstantina Alexopoulou Comments (1st Marker) Mariza Vinieratou 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

2. Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

3. Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

4. Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection. Excellent Very Good Good Concern

5. Evidence of the ability to formulate a critical framework to enable a reflection on your emergent methods of practice including the ability to document, analyse and reflect on practice (including students own practice), with reference to formative influences, critical and evaluative strategies and working processes Excellent Very Good Good Concern

6. Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process Excellent Very Good Good Concern

Additional comments: Although this was a very good first presentation and was clear that the group was able to understand what it means to engage with research in the studio, Konstandina needs to focus and work more on her technical and performing skills. She collaborated very well with the rest of the students in her group and showed a great maturity towards the work that needed to be done. She now needs to connect her exploration to a wider context for performance, look into works of different choreographers and demonstrate a more direct engagement with current professional practice in relation to her work. Suggested mark (first marker); Signed: Date: 10th November 2010 56

2nd Marker FOR MODERATION/ NOT FOR STUDENTS Name of 2nd Marker: Dimitris Tsioukas Student: Konstantina Alexopoulou Please rate as EXCELLENT, VERY GOOD, GOOD, CONCERN next to each criteria 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided: GOOD 2. Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge: GOOD 3. Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work: CONCERN 4. Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection: GOOD 5. Evidence of the ability to formulate a critical framework to enable a reflection on your emergent methods of practice including the ability to document, analyse and reflect on practice (including students own practice), with reference to formative influences, critical and evaluative strategies and working processes: GOOD 6. Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process: GOOD Further comments: Konstantinas participation was vivid and active. There is room for improvement though regarding processual work during research in the studio. She needs to enhance, enrich and develop more her ideas. Suggested Mark: 54 Signed: Date: 10th November 2010

MODERATED RESULTS First Marker: Suggested mark (second marker) _________ Agreed Mark (if applicable) _________ ________

____________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ____________________

(signature of first marker) (signature of second marker) (date finalised)

(date finalised)