1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Patrick Stevenson, Martha Stevenson, and DOES 1 through X, Inclusive, c/o 38545 Alva Drive Cherry Valley, California Postal Zone 92223 In Pro Se

FILE ON DEMAND FOR THE RECORD

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BANNING COURT

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ) SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC ) HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP FKA ) COUNTRY WIDE HOME LOAN ) SERVICING, LP FOR THE ) HARBORVIEW 2006-5 TRUST. ) ) Plaintiffs and Cross-Defendants ) ) ) vs. ) ) ) Patrick Stevenson, Martha ) Stevenson, and DOES 1 through X, ) Inclusive. ) ) Defendants and Cross-Complainants ) )

Case No. BAC 1200623

VERIFIED NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

COMES NOW, the humans, Patrick Stevenson and Martha Stevenson, (NOT PATRICK STEVENSON and MARTHA STEVENSON, governmentally created non -human UPPER CASE Strawman names, a specific legal distinction being made) filing this, their timely VERIFIED NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL, regarding Case No. BAC 1200623.
1

29

VERIFIED NOTICE OF TIMELY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

30 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Since there is no signed Appealable Judgment, Order, or Ruling in the record, a regular NOTICE OF APPEAL would be premature under the One Final Judgment Rule. As of the date of this document, the record shows absolutely no wet-ink signature Appealable Judgment, Order, or Ruling by a constitutionally valid Superior Court of the State of California, Court of Record, Judge, with a mandated Clerks - Seal of Court, nor a constitutionally valid and timely Filed REMITITUR. Appellant Patrick Stevenson and Martha Stevenson is hereby submitting this, their NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL, regarding a Notice of a Court Trial, rather than the DEMANDED TRIAL BY JURY, wherein the judge merely maintains order, and the jury of peers judge BOTH the Law and the Facts, as the last in the original American System of Checks and Balances, pursuant to the American and California Constitutional Law of the Land, and its Common-Law Constitutionally prescribed Court of Record, as there is absolutely no admissible evidence in the Appealable Record that would place Patrick Stevenson and Martha Stevenson or their private land under any type of

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Administrative-Law, Law of the Sea and its Roman Civil Equity Law, in an Administrative Law Tribunal (ALT). Do the above mentioned Facts, a regular NOTICE OF APPEAL, under the one Final Judgment Rule is premature, This leaves Patrick Stevenson and Martha Stevenson no alternative, but to File this VERIFIED NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL according to the fact pattern of this matter, and the well settled legal definition presented below. INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL DEFINED (BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY Seventh EDITION Page 94.) "An appeal that occurs before the trial court's final ruling on the entire case. Some interlocutory appeals involve legal points necessary to the determination of the case, while others involve collateral orders that are wholly separate from the merits of the action. Cf. FINAL JUDGMENT RULE." Among other issues, the Respondents Three Day Notice to Pay or Surrender Possession, dated 4/12/2012 AGAIN names a fictitious name that is not in any contract the opposition holds, PLUS a Subject Matter Jurisdictional Challenge was timely made to both the Plaintiff and to the Court, with absolutely no timely response placed into the instant record, pursuant to the well-settled Case Law generously presented within such Subject Matter Jurisdictional Challenge. The Accused AGAIN, respectfully Demands a good-faith Superior Court, Appellate Department, or California Appellate Court Hearing and Ruling with a Demanded Statement of Facts
2

29

VERIFIED NOTICE OF TIMELY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

30 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

and Conclusion of Law regarding ALL of the issues that will be timely presented in a future Filed APPELLANTS OPENING BRIEF, according to a Briefing Schedule to be issued by such Appellant Department or Appellate Court. Executed by the voluntary act of Our own hands in the Cherry Valley Township and dated this fourteenth day of the eighth month, in the year two thousand and twelve, Anno Domini, in the two-hundred and thirty-sixth year of the Independence of America.

Patrick Stevenson, Appellant in Pro Se

Martha Stevenson, Appellant in Pro Se

3 29

VERIFIED NOTICE OF TIMELY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

30 31

1 2 3 4

VERIFICATION
We, the undersigned, declare that: We have read the foregoing VERIFIED NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL, and know the contents thereof.

5 6 7 8 9 10

We are parties to the above entitled action or proceeding, and certify that the matters stated therein are facts of Our own knowledge. Executed by the voluntary act of Our own hands in the Cherry Valley Township and dated this fourteenth day of the eighth month, in the year two thousand and twelve, Anno Domini, in the two-hundred and thirty-sixth year of the Independence of America.

11 12 13

Patrick Stevenson, Appellant in Pro Se

14 15 16

Martha Stevenson, Appellant in Pro Se

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 29

VERIFIED NOTICE OF TIMELY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

30 31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PROOF OF SERVICE BY FAX

I live in Riverside County, state of California. I'm of the age of 18 and not a party to the within action I live in Cherry Valley, California. I served the following document entitled, VERIFIED NOTICE OF

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL, by Fax from a local UPS Store, and addressed as follows:

RENEE BELCASTRO, SBN 270492 MICHEAL J. KRAHENBUHL, SBN 271021 MICHEAL M. BAKER, SBN 273232 PETE DUNCAN, LLP 4375 Jutland Drive Suite 200; P.O. Box 17934 San Diego, California 92177-0934 Executed by the voluntary act of my own hand in Cherry Valley Township, in the California Republic, and dated this fourteenth day of the eighth month, in the year two thousand and twelve, Anno Domini, in the two-hundred and thirty-sixth year of the Independence of America.

5 29

VERIFIED NOTICE OF TIMELY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

30 31