You are on page 1of 8

Are we better off than in 2008?

The answer is yes - Gerald McKinstry

7/16/13 9:55 PM

Subscribe to Newsday
LONG ISLAND

Today's paper

My Newsday

Islip, NY

84

Register

Log in

wants to get cooking with one of these 26 easy summer recipes.

search newsday.com

Long Island

Sports

Entertainment

News

Lifestyle

Business

Health

Opinion

Jobs

Cars

Real Estate
Columnists

More

Take the Podium

Viewsday

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon Roundup

Letters to the editor

Submit your letter

Gerald McKinstry
41 Comments
Like

Opinion > Columnists


21 Tweet 0

McKinstry: Are we better off than in 2008? The answer is yes


September 6, 2012 5:41 PM By GERALD MCKINSTRY
advertisement | advertise on newsday

Newsday Opinion features


Jimmy Margulies cartoons

Cartoonists react to Egypt's coup

National cartoon roundup

Photo credit: AP, 2008 | Local 869 Financial Secretary David Edgar, center, speaks to a crowd of hundreds of UAW workers during a protest against plant closings in front of Chrysler World Headquarters in Auburn Hills, Mich.

Most popular
Stories Photos

Gerald McKinstry

One morning during a meeting last week in Tampa, Fla., Republican strategist Frank Luntz gave the New York State Republican Party a painting of former President Ronald Reagan. The portrait of the conservative icon sat in front of the podium in the ballroom of the hotel where the state delegation was staying. In

Feds: LIer had 24 pounds of coke, $3M cash


8:51 PM

http://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/gerald-mckinstry/mckinstry-are-we-better-off-than-in-2008-the-answer-is-yes-1.3960022

Page 1 of 8

Are we better off than in 2008? The answer is yes - Gerald McKinstry

7/16/13 9:55 PM

speech after speech from the likes of state party chairman Edward Cox, former Sen. Alfonse D'Amato and House Speaker John Boehner, there were references to Reagan: on the economy, unemployment and Iran, to name a few. Gerald McKinstry
Gerald McKinstry is a member of the Newsday editorial board. bio | email | twitter

Cops: Man in 20s drowns in 8-foot deep pool


28 m ago 7:59 PM 8:54 PM

Five taken to hospital after Westbury crash Cops: Mom drove drunk after nanny attack LI hospital ranked among top in U.S., again
6:09 PM

But the most memorable Reaganism was his famous remark during a debate with President Jimmy Carter: "Are you better off today than you were four years ago?" We're hearing it a lot these days. Paul Ryan asked it. So did Mitt Romney. The simple answer: We are better off. But how quickly we can forget.

Latest Columns
McKinstry: School district gets creative to raise cash McKinstry: Housing saga gets past an obstacle McKinstry: East Ramapo's delayed maintenance will cost McKinstry: Sharp lines in Westchester's housing war McKinstry: Tax cap is working, but where's mandate relief?

Four years ago, the housing market imploded. Financial markets plunged after the subprime mortgage crisis. Lehman Brothers collapsed. The U.S. auto industry was on the verge of failure and the government took control of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. President George W. Bush pushed for a $700-billion economic stimulus package that was eventually approved. We were fighting wars on two fronts, in Iraq and Afghanistan. U.S. combat forces left Iraq in 2011. Former President Bill Clinton on Wednesday covered many of these areas during his 48-minute speech at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., and answered that gnawing question to thunderous applause. "When President Barack Obama took office, the economy was in free fall. It had just shrunk 9 full percent of GDP. We were losing 750,000 jobs a month," Clinton said. "Are we doing better than that today? The answer to that is yes." At a campaign stop in downtown Detroit earlier this week, Vice President Joe Biden summed it in simple terms: "You want to know whether we're better off? I've got a little bumper sticker for you: 'Osama bin Laden is dead and General Motors is alive.'" To be clear, things are better, but we're not where we want, or need, them to be. Not on jobs, education, energy or even our place in the world. The economy is improving, but there's still a way to go. Gasoline prices remain high, wages are stagnant and unemployment is hovering around 8.3 percent. An estimated 12.8 million people are still out of work. Those people aren't better off. And maybe that's the Republican goal -- to attract disaffected voters. But that won't solve their problems. In the remaining eight weeks of this campaign, the candidates must present more than their vision for America. We need to hear a real path to getting the economy humming, on stable ground and getting people back to work, among so many other challenges. The "better off" question worked for Reagan more than three decades ago. It won't work for Romney. If Republicans want a Romney Revolution, they are going to have to start asking different questions -- and then have some answers. Gerald McKinstry is a member of the Newsday editorial board. User rating:
(8) Click to rate

advertisement | advertise on newsday

Wine Tour Long Island


LIVinoTours.com Long Island Limo Wine Tours Reserve Now- $389 (all inclusive)

2013 Best Skin Tighteners


www.SkinCareSearch.com/FaceLifting An Unbiased Review List of The Top Performing Skin Tighteners In 2013

Ulster County Wineries


www.UlsterCountyAlive.com Explore Some of NY's Finest Wineries. Get Info Here.

Comments Please log in to comment. Civility matters; click here to read our commenting guidelines.
http://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/gerald-mckinstry/mckinstry-are-we-better-off-than-in-2008-the-answer-is-yes-1.3960022 Page 2 of 8

Are we better off than in 2008? The answer is yes - Gerald McKinstry

7/16/13 9:55 PM

Log in

41 comments
Comments for this thread are now closed.

Share

Newest

Community nomoretaxes

10 months ago

New york is still the liberal infested sewar that it always was.


eklci

Share
10 months ago

Most people I know are NOT better off. Many have had to take pay cuts or frozen wages. Many have lost work for long periods of time and some are still unemployed. The Obama administration's response to all of this has been to reward those whose actions precipitated the crisis. The author points out that the situation was bad in 2008, but neglects to mention that from 2006 to 2008 (and from 2008 to 2010) both houses of Congress were controlled by Democrats. So Republicans AND Democrats brought us to this place. Neither really has the credibility to bring us out of it, but Obama has had four years and not adequately or competeently addressed the jobs issue. So maybe it's time for Romney as the lesser of two evils. (Best yet would be a third party, but little chance of that happening!)
1

Share

nomoretaxes

10 months ago

Only Government employees and welfare recipuents are better off now than before.

Share reaganwasarat
>

nomoretaxes 10 months ago

Al Qaeda was very well of 8 years ago ( because of their benefactor GWB ) now they are pretty much irrelevant.

Share nomoretaxes
>

reaganwasarat 10 months ago

Until something happens. Better not sleep with the lights off

Share reaganwasarat
>

nomoretaxes 10 months ago

In the last decade right wing hate groups have committed more acts of terror and killed more people in the US then any other group, yet no body is investigating them.

Share
>

nomoretaxes

reaganwasarat 10 months ago

There is no such thing as right wing hate gorups. Hate groups by theier choice of violence are left wing. EG KKK

Share
Page 3 of 8

http://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/gerald-mckinstry/mckinstry-are-we-better-off-than-in-2008-the-answer-is-yes-1.3960022

Are we better off than in 2008? The answer is yes - Gerald McKinstry

7/16/13 9:55 PM

Share
>

reaganwasarat

nomoretaxes 10 months ago

The KKK was an extremely conservative group, they were Christian fundamentalist. Much of the Christian Right leadership of today has ties to the KKK of old. Your complete lack of political understanding is mind boggling.


hemcole
>

Share

nomoretaxes 10 months ago

well said. unions were never supposed to be for government employees. they are negotiating with the people they help to elect. This is a joke.

Share reaganwasarat
>

hemcole 10 months ago

Why were Government employes never suppose to be union members?


seldendennis
>

Share
nomoretaxes 10 months ago

And our troops who are no longer in Iraq. And young adults 19-25 who have health care. And auto workers who have jobs. And people who America was torturing. However gov't workers have seen their collective bargaining rights eliminated, wages reduced and and their jobs decreased. By what measure do you call them or welfare recipuents (sic) better off?

Share nomoretaxes
>

seldendennis 10 months ago

Auto workers have guarentted health benefits but no jobs. Nor do the 19-25 year olds have jobs. IT's just like europe healthcae for all jobs for none. Welfare recipients got cost of living increases from Cuomo or did you forget about that.


GRE999

Share
>

seldendennis 10 months ago

"However gov't workers have seen their collective bargaining rights eliminated, wages reduced and and their jobs decreased." Collective bargaining my eye, these GOVERNMENT employees, they work for us, the TAX PAYER. Why do they even have a union? How much bigger would you like the goverment to be? They are already one, if not the largest employer in the US.

Share jerm00ny
>

GRE999 10 months ago

Yes they are and remember who the person was that expanded the government workforce to its highest level in years... His name was George W Bush...


nomoretaxes
>

Share
seldendennis 10 months ago

Unions had few if any cuts during the last 4 years. The victories against unions are few and minimal at best. The 19-25 may have healthcare but now they can't get jobs wo how are they better off? . Welfare recipients got increases and government workers got
http://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/gerald-mckinstry/mckinstry-are-we-better-off-than-in-2008-the-answer-is-yes-1.3960022 Page 4 of 8

Are we better off than in 2008? The answer is yes - Gerald McKinstry

7/16/13 9:55 PM

raises over the last few years. Few if any pay for their benefits too. They're definitly better off unlike the taxpayer who gets the bill from rising property taxes.

Share rscurtis
>

nomoretaxes 10 months ago

True. A 19-25 year old shouldn't even need health care.

Share
>

nomoretaxes

rscurtis 10 months ago

occaisonally they do.

Share
>

seldendennis

nomoretaxes 10 months ago

You are not aware of what went on with Scott Walker. In Wisconsin? Repug governors have been after unions relentlessly. Do you think 19-25's had better job prospects four years ago? NO. All workers WORK for their benefits, they were never given free. Rising property taxes will get worse if we cut off Fed and state aid, which will happen if we squeeze the federal gov't.

Share
>

nomoretaxes

seldendennis 10 months ago

Wisconsin is a great start. Einstein where do you think the federal and state aid comes from. Do you think that there is someone in albany exreting Money. Property taxes rises because public employees keep expecting more and more. IT's time to give them less and less. The auto workers union got 25 billion in undeserved taxpayer funds to bail out thier benefit funds. They should have waited in line like the rest of the creditors for their share.


GRE999

Share

10 months ago

1-Please stop calling Chrysler one of the big 3 American automakers and please call it one the big Italian (FIAT) automakers! 2-If you think were better off now then you obviously are not a small business owner on Long Island. As an owner that supplies his employees with fully funded health benefits I can tell you that my health insurance costs have gone up by a minimum of 20% since Obamacare was announced - not implemented but announced! Cut the BS and give us tort reform and straighten out the health insurance industry in order to give all Americans affordable health care, not a national health care system

Share jerm00ny
>

GRE999 10 months ago

The issue with health care in this country is that it is a business. That is the problem. Not the care of its citizens but to make money... What is wrong with that picture?

Share
>

seldendennis

GRE999 10 months ago

You clearly state that you health costs went op BEFORE Obamacare was implemented. Yet you still blame it. Do facts matter at all to Repugs?
http://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/gerald-mckinstry/mckinstry-are-we-better-off-than-in-2008-the-answer-is-yes-1.3960022 Page 5 of 8

Are we better off than in 2008? The answer is yes - Gerald McKinstry

7/16/13 9:55 PM

implemented. Yet you still blame it. Do facts matter at all to Repugs?

Share GRE999
>

seldendennis 10 months ago

As per a typical democrat, read what I posted again, the health care costs started rising after Obamacare was announced and not yet implemented! Stop foaming at the mouth long enough to read the post. Insurance companies started raising rates in advance of the implementation of Obamacare!

Share
>

nomoretaxes

seldendennis 10 months ago

The health care costs continue to go up too. Obamacare is an unmitigated disaster. Meanwhile the purchasing power of the dollar has also gone down in the last three years and continues to decline.


reaganwasarat

Share

10 months ago

It is funny that when people talk about gas prices being that they never mention that driving the price of gas UP was the REAL reason we invaded Iraq. Since 1960 there has been a direct correlation between the price of gas and the net profits of the oil industry. When prices go up, so do profits. If we had not invaded Iraq, Saddam Hussein would be flooding the market with cheap oil right now. The price of gas would be very low and so would the profits of Exxon/Mobil.


wayne231

Share

10 months ago

This question is so stupid, it all depends on who got the handouts and the bailouts, very few are better off today than they were would be my guess...

Share reaganwasarat
>

wayne231 10 months ago

Actually this question is a matter of perception. The GOP wants you to think of it in a narrow scope and not look at the bigger picture, i.e. how secure did you feel 4 years ago compared to today. 4 years ago no one's job was secure because no one knew how bad the recession/depression was going to get. No one knew how many companies would go under. When you see companies like Citi, AIG, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers and Bear Sterns going bankrupt no one could safely say that the company they were working for wouldn't also go under. All one knew for sure is that massive lay offs were coming. So if you look at the question of how secure did you feel 4 years ago compared to now, most people would say that they are doing better.

Share jerm00ny
>

reaganwasarat 10 months ago

Well said...


Swordfish

Share

10 months ago

No growth, no jobs, no pipeline, no leadership, no budget - Obama should be toast. But McKinstry, what is your problem - are you Joe Biden's lost brother or something?

Share
Page 6 of 8

http://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/gerald-mckinstry/mckinstry-are-we-better-off-than-in-2008-the-answer-is-yes-1.3960022

Are we better off than in 2008? The answer is yes - Gerald McKinstry

7/16/13 9:55 PM


libslant

Share
10 months ago

What is McKinstry smoking?


Jettech

Share
10 months ago

That is the most ridiculous argument I have ever heard.

Share seldendennis
>

Jettech 10 months ago

Repugs always think reality is ridiculous.


reaganwasright

Share
10 months ago

The question is at what cost. Was it worth 30 billion which taxpayers will not get back to save GM when an organized bankruptcy would have done the same, rather than hand the company over to Obama's UAW buddies.Was the stimulius spending all borrowed money do much of anything except for helping state blcck grants that went to assist their employee pension funds. As we know their were no "shovel ready jobs", nor is this teh 1930's. Also, credit should be given to theBush Treasury Sectry who really did much to put a lid on a banking crisis, not govt. If you can give me specifics that Obama did to get us out of that mess, I would like to here them! But Congress did give permission basically to flood the system with cash, which of course inflates the currency but at least stabilized the situation. ARe we better off, not really, we are still looking at 375,000 new claims a month!, many of the jobs found are low paying service jobs and the underemployment rate is 14%. And since we do not include the couple of million who just took early retirement or disability, or passed thier 99 weeks, the real unemployment rate is higher. The point is business still does not have a clear path as where we are going, and healthcae costs for business has sky rocketed in the past 2 years. BHO has yet to offer any clear tax policy, and has added tons of regs that put a hampter any business development. The unemployment rate is somewhat better, but when you add the cost of energy, housing is still underwater, job growth is non existant, and personal incomes and wealth down, we at beast are not worse, but not much better. Only capitalism and private enterprise can lift us out, and we need a new President who recogonozies that.

Share reaganwasarat
>

reaganwasright 10 months ago

Reagen was a rat.


jerm00ny

Share
>

reaganwasright 10 months ago

"many of the jobs found are low paying service jobs and the underemployment rate is 14%" - Good Point Reagan. We have outsourced many of the other jobs. Just pay attention to how Altschuler made his fortune by outsourcing WHITE COLLAR JOBS to asia. He's a proud american... In my eyes he's a traitior to the AMerican working class.


schrubs1

Share
>

reaganwasright 10 months ago

The loans and TARPS were paid back with interest. US made money on it, saved jobs and industries. Is that against repub goals?

Share

http://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/gerald-mckinstry/mckinstry-are-we-better-off-than-in-2008-the-answer-is-yes-1.3960022

Page 7 of 8

Are we better off than in 2008? The answer is yes - Gerald McKinstry

7/16/13 9:55 PM

seldendennis

>

schrubs1 10 months ago

Yes! Their stated goal is to make Obama a one term President. Anything that helps the country goes against that goal.

Share schrubs1
>

seldendennis 10 months ago

And the repub obstruction of the Obama jobs plan goes along with that. Keep millions unemployed so Obama looks bad.


rm11518

Share

10 months ago

Let's see, no new wars to kill more Americans. No stock market crash. Another housing crash? Nope. Hmmm..., based on these few things alone I'd say we are better off.
1

Share
>

volks 1 UR1

rm11518 10 months ago

SHARE SOME OF THE DRUGS YOU TAKE.

Share

10 months ago

Stop drinking when you write.

Share

Services

Our Network
Explore Long Island am New York The Hometown Shopper CareerBuilder Optimum MSG Varsity Long Island Towns Newsday Cars Newsday Homes News 12 Newsday Connect

Join us on Facebook

Join us on Twitter

Sign up for news alerts

Sign up for newsletters

Get our Apps

Newsday mobile

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Your ad choices | Terms of Service | Contact Newsday | Careers | Media Kit | Advertise with Newsday | Help | Copyright 2013 Newsday. All rights reserved.

Hide Toolbar

Submit

RSS

Today's most popular

My headlines

Register

Log in

http://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/gerald-mckinstry/mckinstry-are-we-better-off-than-in-2008-the-answer-is-yes-1.3960022

Page 8 of 8

You might also like