Professional Documents
Culture Documents
revolutions. To bridge the conceptual gap between the two I will bring
individuals. I will explain what coherence means, how it works and why
the world’s cultures and social groups reject the shade of Islamic
now challenged the near-universal cultural variants that reject this type
of aggression. And also within the small towns and villages in which
or death of members of both groups. I will argue that there are varying
dynamics. To begin this paper I shall briefly run through past attempts
explicate the main theories devised in the 20th century that were
of each theory of science and culture I have listed above to show how
am attempting to flesh out. Along the way I will also use a variety of
and John Millar who postulated that societies move through a series of
four stages; hunting and gathering, pastoralism and nomadism,
Hobbes proclaimed that life before civilization was “nasty, brutish and
culture and society being the pinnacle of this progress. This line of
In the latter half of the 19th century Karl Marx proposed his theory of
understand human nature and the progress of social life was to analyze
society. Ideology was the term he used to describe this expression that
can be seen manifest in the arts, political and social institutions. The
intellectual life.”
mainly due to the fact that the Origin of Species came out eleven years
after Marx wrote The Communist Manifesto. Marx was most influenced
components.
(Atran, 2002). This has created one of the most heated debates in
science of the 20th century. On one side of the debate you have
ideas are rarely imitated with high fidelity and if anything mutation of
scientific theory. On the other hand, the challenges meme theory faces
Dual-Inheritance Theory
his concept of population thinking, which Ernst Mayr called his key
acquire beliefs and values from the people around them, and you can’t
states Boyd and Richerson in their book Not By Genes Alone. Culture is
period lasting from 1.8 million to 10,000 B.C.). The cost/benefit ratio of
Up to this point the paper the word culture has yet to be defined. I will
use the definition Boyd and Richerson give, stating simply that “culture
the traits to digest starch and lactose, respectively (wiki). Boyd and
Richerson are also very skeptical of Dawkin’s meme theory and state,
are sorely mistaken (Hull, 1988). Critics are foremost mistaken about
biological evolution and the role genes play. “Genes do not function in
nature.
Cohen, whom argue that the South (in America) is more violent
acquired beliefs about personal honor that are different from their
1915 the homicide rate in the south was ten times the current rate for
than they would in northern cities and towns. Their findings suggest
a bar fight, but not any more likely to kill the individual behind the
counter when robbing a liquor store from a similar robbery in the north.
settles regions and livestock were easy to steal. Nesbit and Cohen
same over a period of time) and a variety of forces (the processes that
forces. The two random forces they name are cultural mutation and
making is only understood by a few elders, and they happen to die, the
cultural variants allowing individuals to build boats die out. Drift, like
when thinking about such an entity. Parents need not teach their
children that ghosts and demons can hear, see and interact with
bias” is the term that describes the ease of this kind of cultural variant
Evolution”…
complicated motives and this brings us, once again, to the limits
I will return to this problem and Boyd and Richerson’s theory to support
claims I will make later in this paper. For now I turn to Thomas Kun’s
philosopher David Hull, I will show why we can view the scientific
enterprise as composed of cultural and conceptual variants, subject to
scientific paradigms, and how this can help our understanding of the
weight concerning the nature of truth and the nature of the scientific
progress has replaced the hope of ever reaching a “true”, static model
of the universe.
collect empirical data and see how it fits into the current paradigm that
science is operating within. This is what Kuhn calls puzzle solving, and
most scientists spend their entire career doing it. Anomalies begin to
pose. When enough scientists have accepted that this new model is
needed and coherent enough for further use, a “paradigm shift” and
shifts show that new theories are not just incompatible with old
(Kuhn, 1962).
David Hull has picked up where Kuhn has left off in the sense of
Scientists act like individuals in social groups act. They treat their
close “kin” with greater altruism and create alliances with like-minded
scientists, while they compete with other scientists and their theories,
much more accurately than do cultural ideas. This is for the benefit of
the scientific community. But that’s not to say cultural variants don’t
replicate with a fair amount of high fidelity, its just noting that the
concepts can still be seen as cultural variants, but the necessity for
hierarchy that science exhibits. The crux of this idea is that science is
Cultural Paradigms
variants that replicate with high fidelity (As Scott Atran brilliantly
cement, build skyscrapers, and fly commercial airline jets are also a
structure and system. But where can we take this analogy when
their function. Variants, like genes, act in concert with one another, a
fact shown by Hull, and like genes give rise to complex structures.
a given group. The more prevalent the variant, the higher the probably
one the main criteria that Kuhn said were necessary for scientific
progress was that scientists see coherence in the data being collected.
Individuals, I argue, also aim for the same coherence in their own lives.
Lancelot Law Whyte, who worked with Einstein on his theory of special
mind called the conscious and the unconscious. He saw the goal of
testing by creating order where there is none, thus giving rise to order
postulates that the state all humans are in before order is achieved is
information, and how this accounts for change and conflict, both
theorized in the early 20th century that conflict and rebellion are
Scientific anomalies consist of data that doesn’t fit with the current
these at large, and only until enough have accumulated will scientists
violent physical force against blacks in the south stems from, and
resolution. Examples like this can been seen throughout the history of
counties like North Korea and the United States demonstrates this. For
Conclusion
theories are presented and kept organized. The same cannot be said
fitness, changing so rapidly that one-day Jews and Germans are living
relatively peacefully together and the next day Jews are being
be counted in seconds!
and how this applies to a theory of social change and conflict based on
Thomas Kuhn’s model of scientific revolutions. “One of the most
scientific enterprise, that no one else had before him. With this