Professional Documents
Culture Documents
\
|
=___________
Ultimate Tensile Strength
u
3.45 BHN = __________ MPa.
M.E.Ss P.I.I.T., NEWPANVEL MECHANICAL &AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS STRENGTHOF MATERIALS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
EXPERIMENT NO. 5
IZOD IMPACT TEST
Aim: a. To observe the behaviour of specimen under Izod Impact Load.
b. To measure the amount of energy absorbed by the specimen using Impact Testing Machine.
Apparatus: Impact Testing Machine (Pendulum type), Specimen of mild steel material.
Theory:
Toughness is a measure of the amount of energy a material can absorb before fracturing. It becomes of
engineering importance when the ability of a material to withstand an impact load without fracturing is considered.
Impact test conditions were chosen to represent those most severe relative to the potential for fracture, viz.,
(1) deformation at a relatively low temperature, (2) a high strain rate (i.e., rate of deformation), and (3) a triaxial
stress state (which may be introduced by the presence of a notch). The impact test is a common method which
measures the impact energy (notch toughness).
A material possessing a large amount of impact resistance is said to be a tough material. Toughness is the
ability of the material to resist both fracture and deformation. Toughness is different from either strength or
ductility. To be tough, a material must be both fairly strong and fairly ductile to resist both cracking and bending
under impact loading.
Impact testing machines usually take the form of a pendulum which is carried to strike a sudden blow
against the test specimen in a certain standard manner. The energy absorbed from the swinging pendulum by the
specimen is taken as the impact energy value of the material used. The load is applied as an impact blow from a
weighted pendulum hammer that is released from a cocked position at a fixed height "h". The specimen is positioned
at the base as shown. Upon release, a knife edge mounted on the pendulum strikes and fractures the specimen at the
notch, which acts as a point of stress concentration for the high velocity impact blow. The pendulum continues its
swing, rising to a maximum height "h", which is lower than "h". Based on the difference between h and h, the
energy absorption of the specimen is computed.
Notches are provided in the impact specimen to increase the stress concentration and the tendency to
fracture.
Procedure:
1. Set the pointer to the maximum energy level on the scale when the pendulum is freely suspended.
2. Raise the pendulum hammer to the required height. Release it allowing a free swing and observe the
initial energy.
3. Raise the pendulum again to the same height as before and clamp it and set the point to the maximum
energy on the scale.
4. Place the specimen as a vertical cantilever beam at the bottom in the anvil so that the notch faces the
hammer and is half inside and half above the top surface of the anvil.
5. Release the hammer by operating the mechanism. The hammer strikes the specimen and breaks or
bends the specimen.
6. Note the final reading on the scale.
7. Calculate the shock absorbing capacity.
Conclusions:
1. The specimen bends and breaks, or partially bends and breaks indicating different degrees of
toughness.
2. Notch is placed facing the hammer resembling a cantilever beam, so that failure occurs in the tensile
zone corresponding to the maximum stress concentration zone.
3. Shock absorbing capacity under impact loading of mild steel material is found to be _________ J.
M.E.Ss P.I.I.T., NEWPANVEL MECHANICAL &AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS STRENGTHOF MATERIALS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
Loading Arrangement Specimen Dimensions
Experimental Set-up: IZOD IMPACT TESTING MACHINE
Observation Table:
Sr. No. Material Initial Energy IE
(J)
Final Energy FE
(J)
Shock Absorbing
Capacity
(Toughness)
FE-IE (J)
M.E.Ss P.I.I.T., NEWPANVEL MECHANICAL &AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS STRENGTHOF MATERIALS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
EXPERIMENT NO. 6
CHARPY IMPACT TEST
Aim: a. To observe the behavior of specimen under Charpy Impact Load.
b. To measure the amount of energy absorbed by the specimen using Charpy Testing Machine.
Apparatus: Impact Testing Machine (Pendulum type), Specimen of mild steel material.
Procedure: The procedure for this test is similar to that of Izod Impact Test. The difference here is that the striking
energy is much more greater, and the specimen is kept as a simply supported beam and placed on the anvil
so that the notch faces opposite direction to the striking edge of the hammer. Here, the same V-notch may
be used for the specimen, or use can be made of a U-notch at half the depth value. Stress concentration is
produced at the notch to a greater extent which induces the failure to take place at that location.
Conclusions:
1. The shock absorbing capacity of mild steel material =_______ J.
2. The specimen bends and breaks, or partially bends and breaks indicating different degrees of
toughness.
Loading Arrangement
Observation Table:
Sr. No. Material Initial Energy IE
(J)
Final Energy FE
(J)
Shock Absorbing
Capacity
(Toughness)
FE-IE (J)
M.E.Ss P.I.I.T., NEWPANVEL MECHANICAL &AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS STRENGTHOF MATERIALS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
EXPERIMENT NO. 7
FLEXURE TEST ON TIMBER BEAM USING UTM
Aim: a. To observe the bending phenomenon of a rectangular timber beam for given loading, till fracture occurs.
b. To compare flexure of timber beams of same cross section, but with different orientations.
c. To determine the bending strength, elastic modulus of the material.
Apparatus: Timber beams, Universal Testing Machine, Supports, Spanner for tightening, Loading tool, Scale.
Theory: Bending (flexure) tests on smooth (unnotched) bars of material are commonly used, as in various
ASTM (American Standard for Testing & Materials) standard test methods for flat metal spring material,
and for concrete, natural building stone, wood, plastics, and glass. Bending tests are especially needed to
evaluate the tension strength of brittle materials; as such materials are difficult to test in simple uniaxial
tension due to cracking in the grips. The specimens usually have rectangular cross sections and may be
loaded in either three-point bending or four-point bending. Here, we use 3-point bending for the
experiment.
In bending, note that the stress varies through the depth of the beam in such a way that yielding
first occurs in a thin surface layer. This results in the load versus deflection curve not being sensitive to the
very beginning of yielding. Also, if the stress-strain curve is not linear, as after yielding, the simple elastic
bending analysis is not valid. Hence, bending tests are most meaningful for brittle materials that have
approximately linear stress-strain behavior up to the point of fracture.
For materials that do have approximately linear behavior, the fracture stress may be estimated
from the failure load in the bending test using simple linear elastic beam analysis.
I
y M.
=
where, M=Bending Moment, y=half depth of beam, I=moment of inertia of c/s area about the neutral axis.
f
() is usually identified as the bend strength or the flexural strength or rupture modulus in bending.
Yield strengths in bending are also sometimes evaluated. Here, load corresponding to fracture is
replaced by load corresponding to a strain offset at the beginning of yielding.
The elastic modulus may also be obtained from a bending test. In a 3-point bending test, using
linear-elastic analysis, the maximum deflection occurs at the mid-span.
EI
PL
48
3
=
The value of E may then be calculated from the slope (dP/dy) of the initial linear portion of the
load versus deflection curve.
|
.
|
\
|
=
d
dP
I
L
E
48
3
Elastic moduli derived from bending are generally reasonably close to those from tension or
compression tests of the same material, but there are possibilities of several discrepancies.
Procedure:
1. Take two timber beams of same length and same size.
2. Support the first beam on simple supports, and place it symmetrically.
3. Fix the loading tool in the jaws of the middle crosshead of UTM.
4. Adjust the load pointer such that it is at zero position when the tool just touches the beam centrally.
5. Note down the initial scale reading.
6. Operate the control valve, and gradually apply the load at a consistent rate.
7. Note down the different loads and the corresponding scale readings till the specimen shows first sign
of crack.
8. Stop the loading, operate the release valve.
9. Repeat the experiment for other beam having same cross section but with different orientation.
10. Compute the results and compare the two orientations.
M.E.Ss P.I.I.T., NEWPANVEL MECHANICAL &AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS STRENGTHOF MATERIALS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
Results and Conclusions:
1. ORIENTATION 1:
1. Elastic Modulus (E) =_______ MPa.
2. Flexural Strength () = ______ MPa.
2. ORIENTATION 2:
1. Elastic Modulus (E) =_______ MPa.
2. Flexural Strength () = ______ MPa.
3. The values of E and for both orientations are found to be more or less same. Hence,
E=_______MPa and =______MPa may be taken as the average values for timber material.
4. Orientation 2 is found to withstand a greater amount of load even though the cross section dimensions
are same, which is due to a greater value of the area moment of inertia, signifying more resistance to
bending. Conversely, for the same amount of load, orientation 2 is found to consist of less amount of
induced bending stress compared to the other orientation. Hence, the orientation 2 is preferred for
safe design.
Loading of specimen: Orientation 1 Orientation 2
Observations:
1. Length of the specimen (L) =_____ mm.
2. Width of the specimen (W) =_____ mm.
3. Thickness of the specimen (T) =_____ mm.
4. Distance of the extreme-most fiber from neutral axis (y
1
) =______ mm, (y
2
) =______mm.
5. Maximum load to fracture (P) =______ kN.
6. Initial Scale Reading (S
0
) =______ mm.
7. Slope of P- curve = ________ N/mm.
Observation Table: (for both orientations, draw separate tables).
Sr. No. Load P (kN) Scale Reading S
i
(mm) Deflection at mid-span
= S
i
S
0
(mm)
Calculations:
1. Maximum Bending Moment (at mid-span) =M =P.L/4 =__________ N-mm. (calculate for both
orientations i.e., M
1
and M
2
).
2. Area Moment of Inertia =I =AB
3
/12 =_________ mm
4
.
(Note: Here, A = Length of parallel edge of c/s, to the Neutral Axis; and B = Length of
perpendicular edge. Calculate I for both the orientations i.e. I
1
and I
2
).
3. Flexure Strength
I
y M.
= =_________ MPa. (calculate for both orientations).
4. Modulus of Elasticity = |
.
|
\
|
=
d
dP
I
L
E
48
3
=________ MPa. (calculate for both orientations).
P
P/2 L P/2
y
1
y
2
M.E.Ss P.I.I.T., NEWPANVEL MECHANICAL &AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS STRENGTHOF MATERIALS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
EXPERIMENT NO. 8
TENSILE TEST ON THIN ALUMINIUM ROD USING TENSILE TESTING MACHINE
Aim: To conduct tensile test on thin aluminium rod using tensile testing machine so as to achieve the following
objectives:
1. To plot stress-strain curve.
2. To observe elastic and plastic zones.
3. To determine the stresses corresponding to Proportional Limit, Elastic Limit, Yield points, Ultimate
Strength and Fracture (Breaking) Strength.
4. To determine Modulus of Elasticity, Poissons Ratio, and measure of Ductility.
5. To determine the Modulus of Resilience and Fracture Toughness.
Apparatus: Tensile Testing Machine, thin aluminium rod, vernier calipers, allen key, scale.
Procedure:
1. Measure the diameter of the aluminium rod.
2. Take a suitable gauge length so that it may be fixed between jaws of the tensile testing machine.
3. Adjust the scale and load setting of the machine.
4. Mark initial scale reading corresponding to zero load.
5. Gradually increase the load by putting the machine on. The movement of bottom jaw of the machine
is electrically operated instead of the hydraulic action as seen in UTM.
6. Note down the intermediate loads and the corresponding scale readings till fracture occurs.
7. Unload the specimen after fracture.
8. Rejoin the pieces, and measure the final length and the diameter of the specimen.
Results and Conclusions:
1. The following important stress values have been found out:
a. Yield Stress (
y
) = ______ MPa
b. Ultimate Tensile Strength (
u
) =______ MPa
c. Fracture (Breaking) Stress (
f
) = ______ MPa
2. Youngs Modulus of Elasticity (E) =Slope of linear - curve = ______ MPa
3. Poissons Ratio () =______ (till
u
not exceeded).
4. Ductility:
a. % Reduction in c/s area =_______ %
b. % Elongation =_______%
5. Modulus of Resilience (U
R
) =____ J
6. Modulus of Toughness (U
T
) =____ J
7. Ductility measured as % reduction in area, is based on the minimum diameter at fracture and so is a
measure of highest strain along gauge length. But, ductility measured as % elongation at fracture, is an
average over an arbitrary chosen length (gauge length). % reduction in area is not affected by
arbitrariness of L/d ratio, and hence is a more fundamental measure of ductility than is the elongation.
8. Ductile materials are tougher than Brittle materials.
Aluminium Rod Specimen:
Length L d
M.E.Ss P.I.I.T., NEWPANVEL MECHANICAL &AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS STRENGTHOF MATERIALS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
Experimental Set-up: TENSILE TESTING MACHINE
Observations:
1. Diameter of the bar (d) =_____ mm
Area (A) =______ mm
2
2. Gauge length of the bar (l) =_____ mm.
3. Initial Scale Reading (S
0
) =_____ mm.
4. Reduced diameter of the bar (d) =_____ mm.
Area (A) =_______ mm
2
5. Final Gauge length of the bar (l) =______mm.
6. Diameter of bar (till
u
not exceeded) =d
u
=_______mm.
Observation Table:
Sr. No.
Load
P (kN)
Scale Reading
S
i
(mm)
Elongation
l = S
i
S
0
(mm)
Stress
= P/A (MPa)
Strain
= l / l
Calculations:
1. Poissons Ratio () =Lateral Strain / Linear Strain (till
u
not exceeded) =(d/d)/ (l/l) = ________
2. Ductility:
a. % Reduction in c/s area =[(AA)/A] x 100 = _______ %
b. % Elongation =[(ll)/l] x 100 =_______%
3. Modulus of Resilience (U
R
) =Amount of elastic energy which a material can absorb
= (
E
2
/2E) =____ J
4. Modulus of Toughness (U
T
) =Amount of energy which a material can absorb prior to fracture
(
f
x ) = ____ J
M.E.Ss P.I.I.T., NEWPANVEL MECHANICAL &AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS STRENGTHOF MATERIALS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
EXPERIMENT NO. 9
TORSION TEST ON DUCTILE MATERIAL USING TORSION TESTING MACHINE
Aim: To conduct torsion test on mild steel shaft using torsion testing machine so as to achieve the following
objectives:
1. To plot torque-angular deflection (T-) curve.
2. To determine the shear modulus (G).
3. To estimate the shear strength () and fracture strength (
max
).
4. To observe the failure zone.
Apparatus: Torsion testing machine, mild steel rod, vernier callipers, scale.
Theory: Tests of round bars loaded in simple torsion are relatively easy to conduct, and unlike tension tests
they are not complicated by the necking phenomenon. The angle of twist , which is proportional to shear
strain, is generally increased at a constant rate. Torque T, which is of course related to shear stress, is
measured as the test proceeds. Within the initial linear-elastic behavior portion of the test, the shear
modulus G is proportional to the slope (dT/d) and so can be evaluated.
Fracture strength values are subject to a similar situation as in bending tests, namely that non-
linear stress-strain behavior may result in stresses calculated based on linear-elastic behavior not being
accurate. This limitation can be overcome by testing thin-walled tubes in torsion, for which the error is
always small. However, even for solid bars in torsion, the test results may be useful for comparing the
strength and ductility of various materials.
Procedure:
1. Measure the diameter d and length l of the specimen.
2. Fix the specimen between the two jaws of the machine tightly, and adjust the pointer to zero of the
twisting moment scale, and to zero of the angle-of-twist disc.
3. Apply the torque and record the torques and the corresponding angle of twists.
4. Record the twisting moment at fracture, and observe the failure zone of the specimen.
Results and Conclusions:
1. Shear modulus (Modulus of Rigidity, G) =_________ MPa.
2. Fracture strength (Shear Strength,
max
) =________ MPa.
3. In a torsion test, brittle materials fail on planes of maximum tension, which occur at 45 to both the
specimen axis and the specimen surface. This produces a helical spiral fracture. In contrast, ductile
materials generally fail on planes of maximum shear, that is, on planes transverse and longitudinal to
the specimen axis, as for the mild steel material.
Mild Steel Specimen:
Length L d
M.E.Ss P.I.I.T., NEWPANVEL MECHANICAL &AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS STRENGTHOF MATERIALS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
Experimental Set-up: TORSION TESTING MACHINE
Observations:
1. Diameter of the shaft (d) =_____ mm
2. Gauge length of the bar (l) =_____ mm.
Observation Table:
Sr. No. Torque T
(kg
f
-cm)
Angle of Twist
(degrees)
Torque T
(N-mm)
Angle of Twist
(radians)
Calculations:
1. Polar moment of inertia (J
p
) =(/32) x d
4
=________ MPa.
2. From Torsion formula:
l
G
Jp
T
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
Jp
l
x
T
G
i.e., G =(Slope of T- graph within elastic limit) x (l/J
p
)
3. Shear strength () is found from the relation:
r Jp
Te
= where, T
e
=Torque at elastic limit, r =radius.
4. Fracture strength (
max
) is found from the relation:
r Jp
T max max
= where, T
max
=Torque at fracture.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________