You are on page 1of 61

Testing Methods: An Overview

Machine Measurements

James W. Feltes Johnny R. Willis Carlos Grande-Moran


Power Technologies, Inc.

Power Technologies Schenectady, NY

Machine Measurements
u Introduction u Test u Test

Preparation Procedures

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Introduction


u Purpose:

More accurate models

Generator Excitation System Turbine Governor


u Model

Parameters May Be Inaccurate

Not typically verified by field tests Parameters may change (aging, tuning)
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Introduction (cont.)


u Benefit:

Improved Stability Analysis

Possible increase in power transfer capability Equally possible decrease in power transfer capability Increased accuracy in calculation of transient and dynamic stability limits
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Introduction (cont.)


u Advantages

of PTI Test Procedure:

Plant and generator protection remains intact No interruption of CT signals Unit instantly available if needed

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Test Preparation


u Gather

Information

One-line diagram showing metering, protection, and supply to auxiliaries Generator and turbine nameplate data Manufacturers data
Reactances and time constants Saturation curves and Vee curves Reactive capability curve Exciter and governor models, equipment info
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Test Preparation


u Gather

Information (cont.)

Plant data
Hydro unit - physical description (measurements) of flow path (penstock, surge tank, tailrace) Steam unit - heat balance diagram All units - Allowed operating ranges (local criteria or practices)

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Test Preparation (cont.)


u Select

Signals

Accessibility & Location Preconditioned? Transducers? Time delay? Determine location of test equipment Wire signals to common terminal block Signal electrical isolation
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Test Preparation (cont.)


u Visit

control room

Note meter locations and signal ranges Determine feasibility of getting steady state data from SCADA printouts on demand Determine method of communications between operator and test engineers

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Test Preparation (cont.)


u Determine

Test Sequence

Open Circuit Vee Curves Partial Load Rejections


u Detailed

Step-by-Step Test Plan

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Test Preparation (cont.)


u Discuss

Test Procedure

Plant Operators and Engineers Plant Informs System Dispatchers No operator adjustments during data recording Tests typically require 1-2 days, including instrumentation setup

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
u u u u

Test Equipment - Dynamic System Monitor


Recording of AC and DC signals Phasor measurement and recording of AC signals Captures low frequency dynamic phenomena Can compute real & reactive power, phase angle, frequency, etc. in real time Comprehensive data analysis and power system simulation capability through DADiSP and PSS/E Provides digital data allowing later comparison with derived simulation model performance
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
DSM System 200 u Portable Version

Power Technologies, Inc.

Measurement Equipment
u Clamp-on

CT

Power Technologies, Inc.

Measurement Equipment (cont.)


u Split

Core CT

Power Technologies, Inc.

Measurement Equipment (cont.)


u Position

Transducer

Power Technologies, Inc.

Measurement Equipment (cont.)


u Position

Transducer on a Hydro Unit

Power Technologies, Inc.

Measurement Equipment (cont.)


u Magnetic

Pick-up

Power Technologies, Inc.

Measurement Equipment (cont.)


u Optical

Pick-up

Power Technologies, Inc.

Measurement Equipment (cont.)

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Test Procedures


u Steady

State Tests

Open Circuit Tests Vee Curves (MW/MVAr variations)


u Dynamic

Tests

Partial Load Rejections

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Open Circuit Test Procedure
u Goal:

Generator Saturation Curve u Procedure:


Unit at rated speed Main breaker open (unit off-line but at rated speed) Measure Efd and I fd over range of Vt

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Open Circuit Test Procedure (cont.)
u Terminal

voltage measurement range:

30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%, 104%, 108% of rated.
u Take

backup readings (DVM, SCADA) when possible u Make sure generator is isolated from auxiliary loads
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Open Circuit Test Coordination Requirements
u Plant

Operators:

Need to be able to hold unit at rated speed, open circuit (no power)
Hydro units - vibration, controls Steam units - turbine heating, controls Gas turbines - generally no problems

Adjustment of terminal voltage


AVR control range Switch to manual for lower voltages if needed
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Open Circuit Test Procedure (cont.)

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements Vee Curve Test Procedure


u Goal:

Steady State Reactances u Procedure:


Main breaker closed (unit on-line) Take steady-state readings at various load levels (MW) and excitation levels (MVAr)

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Vee Curve Test Procedure (cont.)
u Measured

Values:

Terminal voltages (from PTs) Armature currents (from CTs) Generator field voltage (direct) and current (from shunt) Exciter field voltage (direct) Turbine speed (automatic from DSM) Control signal from governor, valve/gate position, etc. Power angle (requires special instrumentation) if possible

u Calculated

Values:

Real and Reactive Power (once per electrical cycle)


Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Vee Curve Test Procedure (cont.)
u Measurement

Points

Based on unit reactive capability curve Five MW levels (0, 25, 50, 75, 100%) Five MVAr levels at each MW level
Max (+,-) VARs that you are comfortable with 50% of maximum (+,-) Unity power factor

Additional MW levels at any MVAr level


Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Vee Curve Test Procedure (cont.)
u Example

REACTIVE POWER IN MVAR

MVARS ABSORBED

of Measurement Points (100 MVA, 0.85 PF Unit)

OVEREXCITATION REGION

B 50

MVARS SUPPLIED

SAFE OPERATION POWER IN MW 10 50 85 MW 100

D 50 UNDEREXCITATION REGION

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Vee Curve Test Procedure (cont.)
u Measurement
Typical V Curve Measurement Points 500 MW Unit
MW 0 40 80 125 170 210 250 290 330 375 420 460 500 MVAR -250, -125, 0, 125, 250 0 0 -250, -125, 0, 125, 250 0 0 -200, -100, 0, 100, 200 0 0 -150, -75, 0, 75, 150 0 0 -100, 0, 100

Points in Tabular Form

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Vee Curve Coordination Requirements
u Plant

Operators:

Need to go from zero to full load


Hydro and GT - easy Steam - involved process

Reverse-power relaying at zero load Avoid levels of operating problems


Hydro - cavitation Steam - control or auxiliary problems GT - usually no problem areas
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Vee Curve Coordination Requirements
u System

Operators:

Small Plant - usually easy Large Plant:


Requires coordination of dispatch changes with output of other units Adjustment of reactive output may affect system voltages and require reactive power redispatch (reactors, capacitors, scheduled voltages on other units)
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Partial Load Rejection Test Procedure
u Goals:

Generator transient and subtransient reactances and field time constants Turbine-generator inertia Excitation system model parameters Governor model parameters

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Partial Load Rejection Test Procedure
u Procedure:

Five partial load rejections Purpose: provide disturbance to excite unit and determine dynamic response Tests are designed to isolate parameters in order to simplify analysis

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Load Rejection Coordination Requirements
u Plant

Operators:

Need to go to desired loading (real and reactive power) Isolate generator from auxiliary loads Will open main breaker to initiate test Coordinate opening with measurement team No operator adjustments until recording of test completed Re-synchronization following test and preparation for next test
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Load Rejection Coordination Requirements
u System

Operators:

Inform system operator that test is imminent System will see loss in real and/or reactive power Change in frequency very small for systems with large generating capacity Change in line flows or bus voltages may be significant Preventative dispatch or other operating changes?
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Partial Load Rejection Test Procedure
u Test

#1 (Direct Axis Parameters)

0 MW -30% MVAr Excitation system in manual control


u Underexcite

unit so open circuit voltage is lower than operating voltage u Generator saturation minimized
Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Partial Load Rejection Test Procedure
u Test
26 24 Terminal Voltage (kV) 22 20 18 16 14 12 0 5 10 15 Tim e ( S e c o n d s ) 20 25 30

#1 - typical terminal voltage plot:

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Partial Load Rejection Test Procedure
u Test

0 MW -30% MVAR

#2 (Excitation System Parameters)

Excitation system in AVR control


u AVR

Limit var absorption so that field voltage does not go below 50% of value at rated voltage, no load.

parameters including limits u Alternative: Step in AVR reference


Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Partial Load Rejection Test Procedure
u Test
25.6 25.4 Terminal Voltage (kV) 25.2 25 24.8 24.6 24.4 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time (Seconds)

#2 - typical terminal voltage plot:

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Partial Load Rejection Test Procedure
u Test

#3 (Excitation system response in opposite direction)


0 MW +25% MVAR Excitation system in AVR control
Var load should not allow terminal voltage to exceed 8% overvoltage (use data from sat.)

u AVR

parameters including limits

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Partial Load Rejection Test Procedure
u Test

#4 (Quadrature axis and governor model parameters)


5% to 10% MW (typical) -5%to -15% MVAr (typical) Excitation system in manual control
Set VARs so power angle matches power factor, resulting in all flux on quadrature axis

u Small

signal governor response

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Partial Load Rejection Test Procedure
u Test

#5 (Quadrature axis and governor model parameters)


20% MW
May use < 20% MW to limit overspeed Use results of test #4 to estimate overspeed.

-5% to -15% MVAR (typical)


Set Vars so power angle matches power factor

Excitation system in AVR control


u Governor

limit determination

Power Technologies, Inc.

Machine Measurements
Partial Load Rejection Test Procedure
u Test

#5 - typical speed (frequency) plot

150 MW Hydro , 40 MW rejection


61.8 61.6 61.4 61.2 Speed (Hz) 61 60.8 60.6 60.4 60.2 60 59.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 Tim e ( S e c o n d s )

3% Overspeed

Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


u Excitation

system step test on a nuclear unit u Plot of terminal voltage versus time

Terminal Voltage (kV)

Time (cycles)
Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


Same excitation system step test on a nuclear unit u Plot of field voltage versus time
u

dleiF

Time (cycles)
Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


Governor load rejection test. u 650 MW steam unit (70 MW rejection) u Plot of generator frequency versus time
u
(Hz) Frequency

Time (cycles)

Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


Same governor load rejection test. (650 MW steam unit) u Plot of control valve position versus time
u

(%) Pos itio Con n e trol Valv

Time (cycles)

Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

Governor load rejection test. 44 MVA hydro unit (4.8 MW rejection) Plot of generator speed deviation versus time (measured and from simulation model)

Speed

Time (Seconds)
Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

Same governor load rejection test. (44 MVA hydro unit)


Plot of gate position versus

time (measured and from simulation model)

Gate

Time (Seconds)
Power Technologies, Inc.

sition

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

) on (pu iati ed Dev Spe

Governor load rejection test. 45 MVA gas turbine unit (5.4 MW rejection) Plot of generator speed deviation versus time (measured and from simulation model)

Time (Seconds)
Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

Same governor load rejection test. (45 MVA gas turbine) Plot of FSR (fuel command voltage) versus time (measured and from simulation model)

FSR

Time (Seconds)

Power Technologies, Inc.

u)

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

Same governor load rejection test. (45 MVA gas turbine) Plot of exhaust temperature (oC) versus time (measured and from simulation model)

Exh Tem aust pera ( ture

oC)

Time (Seconds)
Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

Governor load rejection test. Same 45 MVA gas turbine unit 12.9 MW load rejection Plot of generator speed deviation versus time (measured and from simulation model)

d e e p S

Time (Seconds)

Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

FSR

Same governor load rejection test. (45 MVA gas turbine - 12.9 MW rejection) Plot of FSR (fuel command voltage) versus time (measured and from simulation model)

Time (Seconds)
Power Technologies, Inc.

u)

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

Same governor load rejection test. (45 MVA gas turbine - 12.9 MW rejection) Plot of exhaust temperature (oC) versus time (measured and from simulation model)

Exh Tem aust pera ( ture

oC)

Time (Seconds)

Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

Governor load ramp test. Same 45 MVA gas turbine unit Plot of generator electric power versus time (measured and from simulation model)

E el c cirt

Time (Seconds)
Power Technologies, Inc.

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

Same governor load ramp test.


45 MVA gas turbine unit Plot of FSR (fuel command voltage) versus time (measured and from simulation model)

FSR

Time (Seconds)
Power Technologies, Inc.

u)

Additional Examples of Measurements


u

45 MVA gas turbine unit

Plot of exhaust temperature (oC) versus time (measured and from simulation model)

Exh Tem aust pera ( ture

oC)

Same governor load ramp test.

Time (Seconds)
Power Technologies, Inc.

Next Step Model Derivation


u Data

processing u Model derivation


- understanding of models and equipment - certain amount of trial and error - experience helps
u Comparison

with test results u Typically requires 1 -2 weeks per unit


Power Technologies, Inc.

Technology Transfer to Utilities


u Training

of utility staff in testing and model derivation


PTIs experience is that testing is more easily learned than model derivation Utility staff generally experienced in plant operations and instrumentation May be less experienced in controls and equipment modeling
Power Technologies, Inc.

You might also like