Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROTOCELL
ARCHTECTURE
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
MARCH/APRIL 2011
PROFILE NO 210
GUEST-EDITED BY
NEIL SPILLER AND RACHEL ARMSTRONG
2 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
FORTHCOMING 2 TITLES
The announcement of Rio de Janeiro as the 2016 Olympic host city has placed Latin America on the
worlds stage. Now, for the rst time since the mid-20th century when Modernist urban design was
undertaken on an epic scale, Latin America is the centre of international attention and architectural
pilgrimage. The mass migrations from the countryside and the erection of informal settlements in the
late 20th century left cities socially and spatially divided. As a response, in recent decades resourceful
governments and practices have developed innovative approaches to urban design and development
that are less to do with utopian and totalitarian schemes and more to do with urban acupuncture,
working within, rather than opposing, informality to stitch together disparate parts of the city. Once
a blind spot in cities representation, informality is now considered an asset to be understood and
incorporated. Today, more than 50 per cent of the worlds population live in cities for the rst time
in human history, and an increasing amount in slums. As a result of globalisation, Latin America is
now once again set to go through major change. The solutions presented in this issue represent the
vanguard in mitigating strong social and spatial divisions in cities across the globe.
Contributors include: Saskia Sassen, Hernando de Soto, Ricky Burdett and the former mayor
of Bogot, Enrique Pealosa.
Featured architects: Teddy Cruz, Urban-Think Tank, Jorge Juregui, Alejandro Echeverri,
MMBB and Alejandro Aravena.
Covers large-scale urban case studies, such as the revitalisation of Bogot and Medelln.
MAY/JUNE 2011 PROFILE NO 211
LATIN AMERICA AT THE CROSSROADS
GUEST-EDITOR MARIANA LEGUA
Volume . No
ISBN , c,c 66a6
Volume . No
ISBN , c,c 66
SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2011 PROFILE NO 213
RADICAL POST-MODERNISM
GUEST-EDITED BY CHARLES JENCKS AND FAT
Radical Post-Modernism (RPM) marks the resurgence of a critical architecture that
engages in a far-reaching way with issues of taste, space, character and ornament. Bridging
high and low cultures, it immerses itself in the age of information, embracing meaning
and communication, embroiling itself in the dirty politics of taste by drawing ideas from
beyond the narrow connes of architecture. It is a multi-dimensional, amorphous category,
which is heavily inuenced by contemporary art, cultural theory, modern literature and
everyday life. This title of 2 demonstrates how, in the age of late capitalism, Radical
Post-Modernism can provide an architecture of resistance and contemporary relevance,
forming a much needed antidote to the prevailing cult of anodyne Modernism and the
vacuous spatial gymnastics of the so-called digital avant-garde.
Contributions from: Sean Grifths, Charles Holland, Sam Jacob, Charles Jencks
and Kester Rattenbury
Featured architects: ARM, Atelier Bow Wow, Crimson, CUP, FAT, FOA, douard
Franois, Terunobu Fujimori, Hild und K, Rem Koolhaas, John Kormelling,
muf, Valerio Olgiati
Over the last 15 years, contemporary architecture has been profoundly altered by the advent
of computation and information technology. The ubiquitous dissemination of design software
and numerical fabrication machinery have re-actualised the traditional role of geometry in
architecture and opened it up to the wondrous possibilities afforded by topology, non-Euclidean
geometry, parametric surface design and other areas of mathematics. From the technical aspects
of scripting code to the biomorphic paradigms of form and its associations with genetics, the
impact of computation on the discipline has been widely documented. What is less clear, and has
largely escaped scrutiny so far, is the role mathematics itself has played in this revolution. Hence
the time has come for designers, computational designers and engineers to tease the mathematics
out of their respective works, not to merely show how it is done a hard and futile challenge
for the audience but to reect on the roots of the process and the way it shapes practices and
intellectual agendas, while helping dene new directions. This issue of 2 asks: Where do we
stand today? What is up with mathematics in design? Who is doing the most interesting work?
The impact of mathematics on contemporary creativity is effectively explored on its own terms.
Contributors include: Mark Burry, Bernard Cache, Philippe Morel, Antoine Picon, Dennis
Shelden, Fabien Scheurer and Michael Weinstock.
JULY/AUGUST 2011 PROFILE NO 212
THE MATHEMATICS OF SPACE
GUEST-EDITED BY GEORGE L LEGENDRE
Volume . No
ISBN , c,c 6c6
1
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
PROTOCELL
ARCHTECTURE
GUEST-EDITED BY
NEIL SPILLER AND
RACHEL ARMSTRONG
oa|aorr
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
VOL 81, NO 2
MARCH/APRIL 2011
ISSN 0003-8504
PROFILE NO 210
ISBN 978-0470-748282
2
GUEST-EDITED BY
NEIL SPILLER AND
RACHEL ARMSTRONG
PROTOCELL ARCHTECTURE
IN THIS ISSUE
1
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
EDITORIAL
Helen Castle
6 ABOUT THE GUEST-EDITORS
Neil Spiller and
Rachel Armstrong
8 SPOTLIGHT
Visual highlights of the issue
r| INTRODUCTION
Its a Brand New Morning
Neil Spiller and
Rachel Armstrong
a6 Structure and the Synthesis of Life
Martin Hanczyc
| Dening New
Architectural Design
Principles with Living
Inorganic Materials
Leroy Cronin
Cronin pioneers a fundamentally
new approach to materials, scaling
up from the nanoscale.
EDITORIAL BOARD
Will Alsop
Denise Bratton
Paul Brislin
Mark Burry
Andr Chaszar
Nigel Coates
Peter Cook
Teddy Cruz
Max Fordham
Massimiliano Fuksas
Edwin Heathcote
Michael Hensel
Anthony Hunt
Charles Jencks
Bob Maxwell
Jayne Merkel
Peter Murray
Mark Robbins
Deborah Saunt
Leon van Schaik
Patrik Schumacher
Neil Spiller
Michael Weinstock
Ken Yeang
Alejandro Zaera-Polo
3
y8 Soil and Protoplasm:
The Hylozoic Ground project
Philip Beesley and
Rachel Armstrong
o Authorship at Risk: The
Role of the Architect
Dan Slavinsky
|| Dream a Little Dream
Mark Morris
o An Architectural Chemistry
Omar Khan
6o Protocells: The Universal Solvent
Neil Spiller
68 How Protocells Can Make
Stuff Much More Interesting
Rachel Armstrong
ro6 Back to the Future
Paul Preissner
rra Line Array: Protocells as
Dynamic Structure
IwamotoScott Architecture
(Lisa Iwamoto)
raa AVATAR and the Politics of
Protocell Architecture
Nic Clear
ra8 COUNTERPOINT
Bettering Biology?
Bill Watts
roo Proto-Design: Architectures
Primordial Soup and the Quest
for Units of Synthetic Life
Neri Oxman
Oxman explores how material properties
are a potent intermediary for the built
environment.
4
1
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
MARCH/APRIL 2011
PROFILE NO 210
Editorial Ofces
John Wiley & Sons
a John Street
London
WC1 N2BS
T: + (c)ac a6 cc
Editor
Helen Castle
Managing Editor (Freelance)
Caroline Ellerby
Production Editor
Elizabeth Gongde
Design and Prepress
Artmedia, London
Art Direction and Design
CHK Design:
Christian Ksters
Hannah Dumphy
Printed in Italy by Conti Tipocolor
Sponsorship/advertising
Faith Pidduck/Wayne Frost
T: + (c).a ,,ca
E: fpidduck@wiley.co.uk
All Rights Reserved. No part of this
publication may be reproduced, stored
in a retrieval system or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording,
scanning or otherwise, except under
the terms of the Copyright, Designs
and Patents Act . or under the
terms of a licence issued by the
Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, c
Tottenham Court Road, London W.T
LP, UK, without the permission in
writing of the Publisher.
Subscribe to 1
1 is published bimonthly and is
available to purchase on both a
subscription basis and as individual
volumes at the following prices.
Prices
Individual copies: aa. / USs
Mailing fees may apply
Annual Subscription Rates
Student: , / USs.., print only
Individual: .ac / USs. print only
Institutional: acc / USs,
print or online
Institutional: ac / USs. combined
print and online
Subscription Ofces UK
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Journals Administration Department
1 Oldlands Way, Bognor Regis
West Sussex, POaa SA
T: + (c).a a,a
F: + (c).a aa
E: cs-journals@wiley.co.uk
[ISSN: ccc-c]
Prices are for six issues and include
postage and handling charges.
Individual rate subscriptions must be
paid by personal cheque or credit card.
Individual rate subscriptions may not
be resold or used as library copies.
All prices are subject to change
without notice.
Rights and Permissions
Requests to the Publisher should
be addressed to:
Permissions Department
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
The Atrium
Southern Gate
Chichester
West Sussex PO. SQ
England
F: + (c).a ,,c6ac
E: permreq@wiley.co.uk
Front cover: Neil Spiller, Baroness Filaments:
Communicating Vessels, Fordwich, Kent,
2008. Neil Spiller
Inside front cover: Concept CHK Design
oa|aorr
5
EDITORIAL
Helen Castle
Neil Spiller has had a long association with Architectural Design (2) and the
visionary in architecture. A veteran guest-editor, this is the sixth issue of 2 that
he has edited. His previous ones include his two seminal issues on cyberspace in
1995 and 1998; Integrating Architecture, 1996; Young Blood, 2001; and Reexive
Architecture, 2002. Whereas Neils issues on cyberspace encouraged us in the
Nets infancy to imagine where the virtual might take us, Protocell Architecture
persuades us that a very different future is in sight for architectural matter. The
innate cumbersomeness and inertness of conventional construction materials
and systems, which block any real engagement with ecological processes, is
to be overturned by the chemical innovations of synthetic biology protocell
technology. That is, articial cell systems that self-reproduce and maintain
themselves. This might be a tomorrows world that is being pregured, but it is
rmly rooted in the science of today. For this issue, Neil has paired up with Dr
Rachel Armstrong (Rachel also has an 2 under her belt, having edited Space
Architecture in 2001). A trained medical doctor and scientic researcher, Rachel
is currently investigating living materials and their potential for built structures.
Along with Martin Hanczyc and Leroy Cronin, she provides much of the
explanation in this issue of the primordial molecular globules that are protocells.
They scale up protocells from the nano scale so that they are visible before our very
eyes in the photographs that accompany their articles.
Why, however, disrupt the today with a seemingly impossible vision of the
tomorrow? Shouldnt we be fully taken up with the present burdens of the
contemporary economic climate and the immediate wrangle with LEED and BRE
ratings? What if established technologies and concrete, timber and steel can only
take us so far? With conventional materials we might just be chipping away rather
than opening up far-reaching new scientic opportunities. The current tool kit
and limited palette of materials may just not be sufcient to tackle the shortfall
in resources and the increasing vicissitudes in global weather systems. It is highly
likely that building materials will only become fully responsive to natural ecologies
if they are made up of cellular materials albeit inorganic; these new materials
could have the potential to modulate their environment in terms of temperature,
light and humidity to their natural surroundings, but also power generation and
self-repair. Neil Spiller and Rachel Armstrong with their contributors effectively
open the door on this possibility for us. 1
Text 2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Image Steve Gorton
Neil Spiller and Martin Pearce (eds),
1 Architects in Cyberspace, Academy
Editions, NovemberDecember 1995
In Spillers rst co-edited issue of 2,
he opened up the possibilities of the
virtual for readers.
6
Neil Spiller, Bitai Table, 1996
top left: Table design for an ophthalmic surgeon. Its
geometries are representations of the various shapes
of articial lens replacements for human eyes plus the
ribbon model of phosphorescent protein.
Neil Spiller, Nativity in Black, 1996
top right: Part 3 of the Trashed Tryptych, a conceptual
project depicting the distortion of the body as it becomes
invisibly puckered, extruded and penetrated by wet and
digital technology.
Rachel Armstrong and Alexander Vladimirescu, Extreme
Environmental Impact on Bryopsis Morphology: A Model
Organism for Systems Architecture and a Challenge
for Natural Selection, Cantacuzio Institute, Bucharest,
Darwin Now Award, 2009
above: Video still footage, edited by Stuart Munro, taken
from the shoreline of the Black Sea, Romania, home of
the green algae Bryopsis plumose, a giant celled plant
that is capable of regeneration after complete mechanical
destruction. Experiments were conducted in collaboration
with Alexander Vladimirescu to observe how the body of
the regenerating seaweed could be manipulated using
magnetism after exposing the healing fragments to
particles of magnetite.
7
ABOUT THE GUEST-EDITORS
NEIL SPILLER AND RACHEL ARMSTRONG
Neil Spiller trained as an architect in London during the 1980s. He worked in
commercial architectural practice for nearly a decade while simultaneously founding
his own experimental practice and teaching architecture. In 1992 he joined the
Bartlett School of Architecture at University College London (UCL) and was
a major contributor to its renaissance, becoming Vice-Dean and Director of
Graduate Design. With Phil Watson, he founded the renowned and inuential
Bartlett teaching unit, Unit 19, and in 2004 founded the Advanced Virtual and
Technological Architecture Research Group (AVATAR). AVATARs mission is
to speculate on the future of architectural design through the lens of advanced
technology. It works within the realms of architecture, Surrealism, synthetic biology,
lm, animation, interaction, cybernetics, digital fabrication and digital theory.
Neil is now Dean of the School of Architecture and Construction at the
University of Greenwich, London. He is a visionary architect, writer, teacher
and critic. He has been instrumental in developing cyberspatial architectural
sensibilities, and was the rst architect to write in any detail about nanotechnology,
as well as one of the rst to speculate on reexive digital environments. In recent
years he has drawn and written extensively on the surreal implications of advanced
technology and the ethics of architecture and architects. He has written and co-
written many books about the futures of architecture and their recent past, and has
now guest-edited six issues of 2.
Rachel Armstrong is a co-director of AVATAR, in Architecture and Synthetic
Biology, at the Bartlett. She is also a Senior TED Fellow, and Visiting Research
Assistant at the Center for Fundamental Living Technology, Department of
Physics and Chemistry, University of Southern Denmark. Her research investigates
living materials, a new approach to building materials that suggests it is possible
for our buildings to share some of the properties of living systems. She is a
medical doctor with qualications in general practice, a multimedia producer, a
science-ction author and an arts collaborator whose current research explores the
possibilities of architectural design and mythologies about new technology.
Rachel is currently collaborating with international scientists and architects to
explore cutting-edge, sustainable technologies by developing metabolic materials
in an experimental setting. These materials possess some of the properties of living
systems and couple articial structures to natural ones in the anticipation that our
buildings will undergo an origins of life-style transition from inert to living matter
and become part of the biosphere. By generating metabolic materials, it is hoped
that cities will be able to replace the energy they draw from the environment,
respond to the needs of their populations and eventually become regarded as alive
in the same way that we think about parks or gardens. 1
Text 2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Images: pp 6(t), 7(t) Neil Spiller; p 6(b) Rachel Armstroing; p 7(b)
Courtesy of James Duncan Davidson/TED
top: Neil Spiller
above: Rachel Armstrong
8
SPOTLIGHT
Tubular Architectures, Cronin Group,
University of Glasgow, 2009
The Cronin Group at the University of
Glasgow is exploring a new materials
paradigm. These tubular architectures, for
instance, that have formed in a beaker of
chemicals, provide a stepping stone in the
groups research at the molecular scale.
Leroy Cronin
9
With the development of protocells, chemistry provides a new future for
architecture. Through the creation of bottom-up cellular systems, a wholly
new material science is promised that is both articial and responsive. The
cellular is brought before our eyes by the research of the Cronin Group and
Martin Hanczyc at the University of Southern Denmark. Fully realised,
Philip Beesleys Hylozoic Ground installation is a textile matrix that is
responsive to its environment and to human touch.
10
Protocells on glass bres
Hanczyc at the Institute of Physics and
Chemistry at the University of Southern
Denmark is creating simple protocells.
Here with aid of uorescent light and
a powerful microscope he makes them
visible to the bare eye.
Martin Hanczyc G
Gravity Screens, Center for Architecture
and Situated Technologies, Department of
Architecture, University at Buffalo, New
York, 200910
Chemistrys contribution to architecture
started in the 1960s with the introduction
of new plastics. At Buffalo, Khan is leading
research into soft materials such as rubber
in these screens.
D Omar Khan
11
12
Hylozoic Ground installation, Canadian
Pavilion, Venice Biennale, 2010
A live textile matrix that provides a new model
for a synthetic but evolutionary ecology.
Philip Beesley G
13
Protocell Architecture 02 [Networks],
1200 x 600 print on lightbox (detail), 2010
Architecture needs to move away from the
massive tectonics of building, and to be
reimagined as a network of information and
experience. Drawing upon Guy Debords
psychogeography and Bernard Tschumis
spatial and programmatic sequences, protocell
architecture suggests the creation of open and
inclusive synthetic spaces that exist between
the virtual and the actual.
Nic Clear
Images: pp 8-9 Leroy Cronin, The
University of Glasgow, 2010; p 10
Martin Hanczyc; p 11 Omar Khan; p
12 Philip Beesley Architect Inc; p
13 Nic Clear
G
14
ITS A BRAND
INTRODUCTION
By Neil Spiller and Rachel Armstrong
15
NEW MORNING
Rachel Armstrong, Protocell Preparation, Center
for Fundamental Living Technology, University
of Southern Denmark, Odense, 2010
Protocells showing a striking contrast in
colour through the different reactions of
copper and iron salts when they come in
contact with the protocells as a result of
the active metabolism embodied in the
oil/water system.
16
17
Here we are more than a decade into the 21st century. We
are told by some quarters that there is nothing new left to
discover in architectural practice and that it has all been
done before. Yet the world is in a big mess and vicariously
architectures ability to help deal with this mess has never
been at such a low ebb. Architects compete like peacocks
for the most colourful tails and justify these shapes with
other tales. Often these conceits include references to
biology (grass, owers, seeds, wings and shells) or through
parametric software make allusions to baroque folds, quilted
curtains and liquid ows. All this is merely the lipstick that
graces the gorillas lips. Buildings still are mostly dumb, inert
blobs of material that act as ecological obstacles.
The fundamental problem that we currently design
buildings as barriers to the environment and not as
proactively benecial environmental technology now needs to
be addressed. To do this effectively we must start to develop
architectural paradigms and technologies that cooperate with
and embrace, rather than dominate, natural imperatives.
This issue of 2, we hope, is a new dawn, much like the 2
issues on Architects in Cyberspace were in the 1990s.
1
It
describes and explores the architectural possibilities of one
set of such technologies the protocells. Such explorations
are by necessity exciting interdisciplinary research, and the
issue includes architects, historians, theorists and scientists
with the intention of capturing some of the sense of discovery
of this new terrain.
A protocell is the output of research programmes aimed
at the construction of a chemical life-like ensemble in the
form of an articial cell system that is able to self-maintain,
self-reproduce and potentially evolve.
2
Protocell technology
is the application of protocells to design challenges, and it
behaves as a kind of primordial clay that exists between inert
traditional matter and conventional biology.
In keeping with the interdisciplinary approach to
this issue, protocell technology is described in broad
architectural terms rather than adhering to strictly
scientic denitions. The reasons for doing so are twofold.
Firstly, protocells have a broad cultural applicability,
which extends beyond their existence in the laboratory.
Secondly, scientists themselves have conicting views
on what characterises this new technology and what it
actually means. Some declare that protocells do not yet
exist because they need to full three criteria to reach a
technical degree of life, which specically requires the
presence of a container, a metabolism and information.
3
Currently this implies that the protocell needs to be able to
replicate itself using chemical information-storing systems
such as DNA or RNA. Other researchers, such as Martin
Hanczyc, regard the protocell as the agent that precedes
the rst fully articial minimal cell, one that is created
from its chemical ingredients rather than stripped down
from a pre-existing biological system as was achieved by
JC Venters laboratory earlier this year.
4
Neil Spiller, Communicating Vessels,
Fordwich, Kent, 2007
opposite: Site plan. The surreal
interconnected vessels are akin to the
anatomy of the biological cells: not
fully understandable, complex and
unpredictable.
Rachel Armstrong, Protocell Preparation, Center
for Fundamental Living Technology, University
of Southern Denmark, Odense, 2010
top: Protocells created by the Btschli
method, an oil-in-water droplet system
that exhibits properties normally associated
with living systems, such as movement,
sensitivity and complex behaviour; for
example, the deposition of solid material
over time. These protocells are freshly
formed and are interacting with their
environment and with each other by virtue
of an internal chemistry, or metabolism.
18
Protocells are the transition stage towards the creation
of fully articial cells using a bottom-up approach to their
assembly, and are an essential part of the discovery of
living processes rather than the goal. Andrew Ellington even
questions the value of life as a scientic objective, since
this terminology does not convey empirically executable data
that can be objectively quantied through scientic research
methods or technologies. Ellington argues that matter
simply needs to be sufciently interesting to warrant further
exploration without reference to a variety of non-empirical
value systems that are implicit in the current debates around
the denition of life.
5
But protocells, as a chemical technology
rather than an ideological model and an embodiment of
an alternative to life do exist, and these dichotomies of
existence or non-existence are part of the dualistic, industrial
paradigm that currently besets the practice of science as
technology and is one which protocells inherently resist.
The protocell is a technology that is native to the
21st century and is likely to dene it. Indeed, we will be
so bold to go as far as to say that the protocell model
that engages with living processes is the rst technology
that can challenge the top-down imperatives of DNA, the
information-processing system of biology, in an experimental
way. Its mere existence is extraordinarily profound as it
strikes at the core of the dominant ideologies and tyrannical
dogmas about our identity that have been conned to
the chemistry of a single, sophisticated chemical that
has shaped our engagement with living systems and
the environment throughout the latter part of the 20th
century, necessitating blueprints, hierarchical systems of
organisation, determinism and atomic-scale precision.
This issue of 2 more than supposes the existence of
protocells; it gathers evidence from the laboratory benches
where they are being developed and anticipates their
architectural relevance which, by virtue of its environmental
connectedness, has the potential to become more than
environmentally friendly a benign state of being but
environmentally remedial active and subversive.
For the purposes of our discussions we have dened
protocells as being primordial molecular globules, situated in
the environment through the laws of physics and connected
through the language of chemistry. Uniquely, protocell
technology possesses a material simplicity that forms through
self-assembly. Yet the globule can become dynamic and
exist in various forms because it has an embedded chemical
metabolism and can be fabricated from scratch using a
highly simplied set of organic and inorganic chemicals
see the Protocell Manifesto on pp 2425 which, based on
Dadaist text, ridicules what we as its authors consider to be
the meaninglessness of biological formalism proposing the
principles of protocell architecture as an alternative.
Protocells exist as a variety of species Martin Hanczycs
protocell technology (pp 2633) is composed of a dynamic oil
droplet in water, while Leroy Cronins iChell (pp 3443), another
Protocells are the transition stage towards
the creation of fully articial cells using
a bottom-up approach to their assembly,
and are an essential part of the discovery of
living processes rather than the goal.
19
above: Protocells created by the Btschli
method using a variety of different
metabolic chemistries to create brightly
coloured crystals at the oil/water interface,
which also act as an indicator that an
active process is occurring.
top: The protocells at six weeks old.
Crystalline deposits at the oil/water
interface resemble aspects of the
mineralisation process seen in bone.
20
Protocells inherently engage with the principles of
design. They manipulate and can be manipulated
to alter matter in their environment, reworking and
repositioning this material in time and space a
strategy shared by life to avoid entropy and the decay
towards equilibrium, in other words, death.
21
species of protocell, is composed of inorganic chemicals that
have not been conventionally associated with living systems.
Protocells do not operate within the realms of
biological processes that are associated with living
systems, but are driven by primordial organising forces
the laws of physics and chemistry. Yet protocells
can be regarded as native terrestrial entities that can
operate in a much wider solution space of possibility
than biology does. So while DNA produces biology as the
result of its proliferating cellular processes, populations
of protocells create completely different forms, functions
and landscapes from their materials. Protocells are not
just a happy accident of the environment, as implied by
the principles of biology rst formalised by Charles Darwin
(180982) in the theory of natural selection, since there
is nothing random about their existence.
I am not speaking of randomness, but of the central
principle of all history contingency. A historical
explanation does not rest on direct deductions from
laws of nature, but on an unpredictable sequence of
antecedent states, where any major change in any
step of the sequence would have altered the nal
result. This nal result is therefore dependent, or
contingent, upon everything that came before the
un-erasable and determining signature of history.
SJ Gould, Wonderful Life, 1989
6
Protocells inherently engage with the principles of design.
They manipulate and can be manipulated to alter matter in
their environment, reworking and repositioning this material
in time and space a strategy shared by life to avoid entropy
and the decay towards equilibrium, in other words, death.
In frantically throwing out entropy, protocells shape their
surroundings and make products that document this process.
They are observed as microstructures that become materials
through collective interaction and engagement with dynamic
environmental processes. This protocell architecture can
be thought of as an alternative arrangement of terrestrial
chemistry that ultimately results in a new living system that
has been midwifed into existence by human design and
technological innovation.
In this study of the unnatural history of protocell
technology, the contributors to this issue comment on the
implications of the discovery of these new living systems,
taking on a similar role to the original natural historians
such as Carl Linnus (170778), Antonie Philips van
Leeuwenhoek (16321723) or Darwin, who provided
insights into the behaviour of biology by observing and by
comparatively analysing the appearance of different species in
different natural habitats to make deductions about what was
causing the variation between them. Mark Morris comments
on the agency of protocells and the scales at which architects
conventionally work to examine their architectural relevance
(pp 449). Omar Khan urges the need for an architectural
opposite: The protocells in the process
of laying down crystals of black/brown
magnetite, a magnetic iron oxide. The
structure is produced by the diffusion and
precipitation of inorganic salts interacting
with the metabolism of the protocells. The
precipitates have been produced over the
course of several minutes and are several
millimetres in diameter.
top: The protocells at three months
old. Crystals have appeared at the oil/
water interface and a second wave of
mineralisation has taken place through the
competitive diffusion of metal ions, which
has changed the dominant colouration of
the deposits.
22
imagination in the design of responsive and adaptive
materials, and comments on the role of scaling, inhabitation
and duration as essential parameters missing from the
design of smart materials (pp 509). Khan considers how
chemistry, literally and operatively, can become the basis for
architectural thinking. Neil Spiller indulges in the implications
of the subversive surrealness of these wet technologies
(pp 607), while Rachel Armstrong explores some of the
implications of these chemical relationships in a literal sense
when they are implemented in a material context (pp 6877).
An example of the implementation of these new materials in
architectural practice is provided in Philip Beesleys Hylozoic
Ground project (pp 7889), and Dan Slavinsky examines the
novel forms that result from these moist architectures through
a new grammar of protocell ornament (pp 909).
Protocells are surprisingly social, which challenges the
singularity of the origins of life as an event and hints at the
evolution of living systems as being collectives by nature. Neri
Oxman observes evidence of protocells within her material
ecology thesis and establishes them as agents of synthetic
ecologies with architectural purpose (pp 1005). Paul
Preissner investigates the construction principles of protocell
technologies as a method in which to repair and update
existing architectural projects, and examines their control
strategies, which are integrated within their environment (pp
10611). Lisa Iwamoto views protocells as environmental
lters and architectural drivers that create new possibilities for
sustainable design interventions (pp 11221), and Nic Clear
looks at the opportunities that the ambiguous technology
of protocells presents in a broader context, reecting on a
timeline for change in architectural practice (pp 1227).
The implications of protocell technology are far-
reaching and offer a long-awaited new beginning for
architecture. This beginning may be as profound as
a second biogenesis for biology and the origins of life
sciences, which promises much more than a brand new
day and opens up a whole new world. 1
Notes
1. See Neil Spiller, 2 Architects in Cyberspace, Vol 65, No 118, November
1995; and Martin Pearce and Neil Spiller (eds), 2 Architects in Cyberspace
II, Vol 68, No 11/12, Nov/Dec 1998.
2. Ricard V Sol, Andrea Munteanu, Carlos Rodriguez-Caso and Javier Maca,
Synthetic Protocell Biology: from reproduction to computation; see www.
santafe.edu/media/workingpapers/06-09-033.pdf, accessed October 2010.
3. Steen Rasmussen et al, Protocells: Bridging Nonliving and Living Matter,
MIT Press (Cambridge, MA), 2008, p 71.
4. Daniel G Gibson et al, Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a
Chemically Synthesized Genome, Science, Vol 329, No 5987, 2 July 2010,
pp 526.
5. Rachel Armstrong, Systems Evolution and Bio-Feminism: Move over
Darwin; see www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=621, accessed October 2010.
6. SJ Gould, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History,
WW Norton & Co (New York), 1989. p 283.
above and opposite bottom left: The
protocells in the process of simultaneously
laying down crystals of black/brown
magnetite and calcium carbonate, a
limestone-like material that has been
used as a traditional architectural
building material. The protocells are able
to metabolise different environmental
materials separately, although all of the
protocells in this ask possess the same
internal metabolism.
opposite bottom right: Iron- and calcium
salt-based structures produced by Btschli
protocells over the course of an hour and
reaching several centimetres in height.
opposite top and overleaf: A rich variety
of crystals produced by a population
of Btschli protocells with the same
metabolism. Protocells are an example
of living technology that exhibits some
of the properties of living systems, such
as growth and metabolism, which are
demonstrated in this experiment, and are
selectively responsive to the chemical
landscape of their environment.
23
24
1 We want to change the world with almost nothing.
It is possible to generate complex materials and architectures
through harnessing the fundamental energetics of matter; in
other words, doing more with less.
2 What we call protocell architecture is, at root, a piece
of Dadaist and Surrealist research, in which all the lofty
questions have become involved.
The novel self-assembling material systems that arise from
protocell architectural practice make no reference to, nor
attempt to mimic, bio-logic. As such, protocell architecture
is an alien to the natural world, yet speaks the same
fundamental languages of chemistry and physics. The results
of these conversations and interactions constitute a parallel
biology and second biogenesis whose aesthetics are described
by Surrealist agendas.
3 Architecture is dead, long live architecture.
Protocells constitute a disruptive technology for architectural
practice since they are capable of reaching a transition point
when evolution emerges within the system, the outcome
of which is unpredictable, and therefore offer novel and
surprising ways of constructing architecture that will succeed
and replace conventional technologies.
4 Protocell architecture swallows contrast and all contradictions
including the grotesquery and illogicality of life.
Protocell technology is at the beginning of an evolutionary
pathway that is connected to, and dependent on, the
environmental conditions around it. The responsiveness
of protocells to stimuli means they can be regarded as
computing units. Consequently, protocells do not seek to
generate idealised architectural forms but to reect and
interpret the full spectrum of the processes they encounter
in the real world.
5 What is generally termed life is really a frothy nothing that
merely connects.
Protocell technology offers an opportunity for architects to
engage with the evolutionary process itself. Unlike natural
biological systems that evolve randomly according to
Darwinian evolution, protocell technology allows deliberate
A MANIFESTO
FOR PROTOCELL
ARCHITECTURE:
AGAINST
BIOLOGICAL
FORMALISM
25
and specic interventions throughout the entire course
of its coming into being. By moving and metabolising,
protocells may form the basis for a synthetic surface
ecology. These interventions are the basis of what we call
protocell architecture.
6 We do not wish to imitate nature, we do not wish to
reproduce nature, we want to produce architecture in the
way a plant produces its fruit. We do not want to depict,
we want to produce directly, not indirectly, since there is no
trace of abstraction. We call it protocell architecture.
Protocell architecture embodies the principles of emergence,
bottom-up construction techniques and self-assembly. It is
equipped with design handles that enable the architect to
persuade rather than dominate the outcome of the system
through physical communication. As such, these systems are
unknowable, surprising and anarchic.
7 We want to collage effective organic machinery that
composes itself according to the drivers of biological design.
Protocell architecture is chemically programmable and
operates in keeping with the organising principles of
physics and chemistry.
8 We want over and over again, movement and connection; we
see peace only in dynamism.
Protocell architecture gathers its energy from the tension that
resides at an interface between two media such as oil and
water, which causes movement, disruption and change. It
resists the equilibrium since this constitutes death.
9 The head is round, so thoughts can revolve. The head of
architecture is green, robust, synthesized, and exists everywhere
simultaneously, whether it is large or very, very small.
Protocell architecture is fashioned from low-tech biotech
characterised by ubiquitous, durable and affordable materials.
10 We wish to blur the rm boundaries that self-certain people
delineate around all we can achieve.
Protocell technology becomes a co-author in the production
of architecture through the possession of living properties and
its ability to self-assemble.
11 We tell you the tricks of today are the truths
of tomorrow.
Protocell architecture is better adapted to the
prevailing physical and social conditions since it is
founded on a new set of technologies that are not
alive but which possess some of the properties
of living systems. As such these technologies are
qualitatively different to the industrial and digital
technologies that have become the mainstream tools
of the 20th century.
12 We will work with things that we do not want to design,
things that already have systematic existence.
Protocell technology has the capacity to transform and
modify existing building materials and architecture with
the potential for surprise.
13 You know as well as we do that architecture is nothing
more than rhythms and connections.
Protocell architecture embodies the complexity of
materials in a literal rather than a metaphorical manner,
and becomes a physical part of our existence.
14 We will construct exquisite corpses, not dead but
alive and useful.
Protocell architecture is central to the understanding
of living systems. It allows us to work with and
enhance the unavoidable inconsistency that is the
essence of life itself.
15 We deal in a second aesthetic, one that initiates
beginnings and moulds with natural forces.
Protocell architecture is connected to the environment
through constant conversation and energy exchange with
the natural world in a series of chemical interactions
called metabolism. This involves the conversion of one
group of substances into another, either by absorbing or
releasing energy doing more with less.
Text 2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Images: pp 14,
1725 Photographs by Rachel Armstrong, 2010;
p 16 Neil Spiller
26 26
In the laboratories of the Institute of
Physics and Chemistry at the University of
Southern Denmark, Martin Hanczyc has
been creating simple protocells. Here he
explains the principles behind the bottom-
up synthetic biology and why a clear
analogy can be made between architecture
and the self-assembling protocell.
Martin Hanczyc
STRUCTURE
AND THE
SYNTHESIS
OF LIFE
Synthetic protocell
above: A protocell-type structure produced
through the self-assembly of different lipid
molecules. Different uorescent molecules
linked to the different lipids allow for
detailed visualisation of the structure with
microscopy. The diameter of the structure
is about 50 microns.
Synthetic cell membranes
opposite: The self-assembly of millions of
single lipid molecules into a population of
large complex structures as seen with a
uorescent microscope. The formation of
these structures takes in the order of
seconds to minutes. Fluorescent markers
linked to the lipid molecules allow for
visualisation of the resultant structures. The
size of the image is 300 x 300 microns.
27 27
Life synthesised from the bottom up (from simple to more
complex) though the stepwise accretion of sophistication may
be created through chemistry in the laboratory. The bottom-up
approach follows closely the classical denition of synthetic
biology put forth by Stephane Ludec in 1914:
Just as synthetic chemistry began with the articial
formation of the simplest organic products, so biological
synthesis must content itself at rst with the fabrication
of forms resembling those of the lowest organisms. Like
other sciences, synthetic biology must proceed from
the simpler to the more complex, beginning with the
reproduction of the more elementary vital phenomena.
1
Bottom-up synthetic biology is primarily concerned with
protocells. Protocells are simple chemical models of living
cells that possess some of their properties, such as metabolism,
movement, replication, information, and evolution, but are not
necessarily alive.
2
They are articial in that they are conceived
and made in a laboratory. There may be several unrelated
varieties of protocells. Both in form and composition, they may
hold no similarity to, but only mimic, natural living cells in
their functionality.
The construction of a protocell begins with different
types of both natural and synthetic molecules. The chemical
and physical properties of individual molecules govern their
formation into higher-order structures, such as synthetic cell
membranes. The structures are collections of hundreds of
millions of molecules that then possess properties not present
in the individual molecules. Some structures, such as synthetic
protocells, resemble roughly the architecture of living cells
with the same size scale.
3
There is a clear analogy here between
synthetic biology and architecture: a system is conceived and
then synthesised from the bottom up using modular pieces that
assemble or self-assemble into a larger structure which possesses
functionality and form derived from the structure as a whole but
not possessed by the building blocks in themselves.
It has long been thought that self-assembly (the inherent
ability of some molecules to assemble together spontaneously
into larger organised structures) is sufcient to explain the
fundamental formation of living systems.
To make an organism demands the right substances in
the right proportions and in the right arrangement. We
do not think that anything more is needed.
George Wald, 1954
4
The point of faith is: make the polypeptide sequences
at the right time and in the right amounts, and the
organization will take care of itself. This is not far from
suggesting that a cell will crystallize itself out of the
soup when the right components are present.
Joshua Lederberg, 1966
5
When the appropriate macromolecule has been formed,
the nal and crucial stage, leading to a primitive
organism, would then be one of self-assembly.
Sidney Fox, 1968
6
However, despite more than a hundred years of experimentation
with self-assembly, no one has successfully demonstrated the
synthesis of life in the laboratory according to this principle.
7
Simply, the self-assembly of molecules into higher-order
structures may represent an equilibrium state, such as the
self-assembly of oil droplets around a cloth bre. In chemistry,
equilibrium equals death. Living cells and systems continuously
consume energy and material to avoid equilibrium, therefore
the self-assembly of higher-order structures is only one step in
the attempt to synthesise life; the structure must then be able to
consume materials while at the same time maintain itself.
8
28 28
In recent experiments at the Institute of Physics and
Chemistry at the University of Southern Denmark it has been
possible to create a simple protocell self-contructed through
self-assembly and, once assembled, showing dynamic motility.
The protocell is motile because it contains a simple one-step
metabolism that allows for the maintenance of its structure over
time. The continuous maintenance of the protocell structure
results in movement of the structure in space. The speed and
direction of the motility is governed by the protocell itself.
While in motion, the protocell remodels its environment leaving
a chemical or physical trail characteristic of protocell motility.
Because this type of protocell contains an interface boundary
that is highly sensitive to the chemical environment, it is able
to sense and respond to gradients in that environment and in
doing so displays a behaviour called chemotaxis directional
movement with respect to an external chemical gradient
which is normally attributed to living cells.
9
As the protocell moves it remodels the chemical landscape
with signals to which it is sensitive. The protocell may therefore
exhibit a very rudimentary form of memory by structuring
its own environment
10
with its future action inuenced by its
past behaviour which is encoded in a chemical imprint on the
system. By synthesising such protocells, it was discovered that
self-assembled structures, when embedded with a chemical
metabolism, can possess lifelike characteristics such as sensing,
motility and memory. No natural living cell resembles the
protocell described here either in composition, form or
mechanism. Nevertheless, both the natural and synthetic cells
share the same type of functionality. The motile protocell
described consists of only ve different chemicals, making it
economical and easy to produce; thus protocell technology may
form the basis for new smart materials
11
applicable to the future
of architectural design.
12
The protocell is motile because
it contains a simple one-step
metabolism that allows for the
maintenance of its structure
over time. The continuous
maintenance of the protocell
structure results in movement
of the structure in space.
29 29
Self-assembly of oil droplets around
a cloth bre
opposite: An optically clear solution
turns turbid over time as the self-
assembly of molecules to form oil
droplets occurs. The microscopic image
is roughly 500 x 500 microns.
Protocell motility
above: As the red protocell moves through
a dish containing a pH-sensitive dye, a
trail of low pH is noticed. The protocell is
moving towards the lower right-hand edge
of the dish. The diameter of the dish is 3.5
centimetres (1.38 inches).
30 330 3
The chemical landscape
Visualisation of the chemical landscape
produced by the protocell. An initially
homogeneous environment is transformed
by the behaviour of the protocell as
evidenced by the emergence of chemical
gradients as visualised by both red and
green uorescent molecules added to the
environment. The upper-left panel also
shows that the action of the protocell
produces physical structures in the external
environment. All images are merged in the
bottom-right panel. The size of each frame
is about 500 x 500 microns.
31 31
hypothesis-driven science allows us to take gradual steps in
our understanding of the natural world that reveal a limited
piece of the puzzle, under highly constrained and usually
surreal conditions. Perhaps we are too naive to demonstrate an
understanding of life. Even if this is true, signicant progress
can be made both through normal scientic method and also by
considering concepts not typically used in science. For example,
the application of the artistic concept of Maximalism to the
creation of a synthetic cell in order to achieve the necessary
amount of complexity has been proposed.
15
If the structure
of a synthetic cell and its environment needs a certain level
of complexity, then it may be futile to follow a reductionist
or engineering path too closely. A scientic dichotomy may
exist between understanding life and synthesising life, at least
at this point in time. To synthesise life, perhaps a chemical
system too complex to understand must be created and
tested. If the chemical system is too complex, then a concise
and comprehensive understanding of the system may not be
attainable, even if synthetic life is created therein.
Structure is the key to synthesising life from the bottom up;
a complete system needs to be designed with structure present
in the agent and structure supplied from the environment.
The ow of energy and material in an open, self-maintaining
system may provide additional necessary structure and
dynamics. A quantitative understanding of both internal and
external structure may be necessary to understand the minimal
complexity required to synthesise life. The choices the designer
needs to make then become crucial: which structural elements
should be supplied and which should (hopefully) emerge in the
experiment? The hope is that a protocell, such as the motile one
described here, will be able to remodel its environment to create
the necessary conditions for its own persistence and evolution.
The challenge for the designer, then, is to create not only the
lifelike structure, whether it be a chemical protocell or a living
building, but also the correct environmental context. 1
Due to the method of construction, the protocell may be
programmed to contain various chemistries and metabolisms,
from simple to complex. The protocell can therefore be
programmed to consume or produce selectively in a given
environment. When two protocells with different metabolisms
produce products that are then exported into the environment,
these products could be detected by the protocells affecting
their behaviour, leading to higher-order interactions in protocell
populations
13
through chemical communication.
The protocell is also able to interact with and modify more
complex environments such as protocells on glass bres. This
work was carried out in collaboration with Christian Kerrigan,
artist in residence at the Victoria & Albert Museum, supported
by the Paul Hamlyn Foundation. It is hoped that ultimately
protocells can be developed that are able to adapt to and
navigate within real-world environments and systems; protocells
that through their embedded chemistry and dynamic movement
are able to perform some needed function in the environment.
An example of this would be the accelerated chemical
petrifaction of rotting wooden pilings that support buildings
throughout the world.
14
In order to create synthetic living systems, the systems
must be open with respect to the inux and outow of matter
and energy. Interest here lies in the emergence, persistence and
evolution of structure in open systems. Indeed perhaps all the
life around us produced by almost four billion years of evolution
is nothing other than an elaborate structure produced by the
ow of high-energy radiation from the sun into thermal energy
on the earth. If we are lucky we can produce, on a very small
scale, conditions in the laboratory that mimic such an open
system that is capable of forming and sustaining synthetic life.
Given that many attempts have been made over the past
hundred years to synthesise life in the laboratory and none
have been successful, one must question whether the correct
tools and concepts are being used to achieve the goal. Normal
The ow of energy and material in an open, self-
maintaining system may provide additional necessary
structure and dynamics. A quantitative understanding of
both internal and external structure may be necessary to
understand the minimal complexity required to synthesise
life. The choices the designer needs to make then become
crucial: which structural elements should be supplied and
which should (hopefully) emerge in the experiment?
32 32
Two protocells with different metabolisms
opposite: The protocell in the lower left
is slowly producing a product that then
forms a halo surrounding the protocell. The
neighbouring protocell does not produce
this product and such processes may
govern the interaction between the two
protocells. The diameter of each protocell
is about 100 microns.
Protocells on glass bres
above: Light emitting from the uorescent
protocells (bright spots) illuminates the
glass-bre landscape. The protocells are
able to move and interact in this highly
structured three-dimensional environment.
The dimension of the imaged eld by
microscope is 1 x 1 millimetres (0.039 x
0.039 inches).
33 33
Notes
1. S Leduc, The Mechanism of Life, William Heinemann (London), 1914.
2. JW Szostak, DP Bartel and PL Luisi, Synthesizing Life, Nature 409,
2001, pp 38790.
3. MM Hanczyc, SM Fujikawa and JW Szostak, Experimental Models of
Primitive Cellular Compartments: Encapsulation, Growth and Division,
Science 302, 2003, pp 61822.
4. G Wald, The Origin of Life, Scientic American, 1954, pp 4553.
5. J Lederberg, Current Topics in Developmental Biology, Vol 1, 1966, pp
ixxiii.
6. SW Fox, Self-Assembly of the Protocell from a Self-Ordered Polymer,
Journal of Scientic & Industrial Research 27, 1968, pp 26774.
7. MM Hanczyc, The Early History of Protocells: The Search for the Recipe
of Life, in S Rasmussen, MA Bedau, L Chen, D Deamer, DC Krakauer, NH
Packard and PF Stadler (eds), Protocells: Bridging Nonliving and Living
Matter, MIT Press (Cambridge, MA), 2008, pp 318.
8. FG Varela, HR Maturana and R Uribe, Autopoiesis: The Organization of
Living Systems, its Characterization and a Model, BioSystems, 5, 1974, pp
18796.
9. MM Hanczyc, T Toyota, T Ikegami, N Packard and T Sugawara, Fatty Acid
Chemistry at the Oil-Water Interface: Self-Propelled Oil Droplets, Journal of
the American Chemical Society 129(30): 2007, pp 938691.
10. N Horibe, MM Hanczyc and T Ikegami, Shape and Motion Dynamics in
Self-Moving Oil Droplets, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, forthcoming.
11. MM Hanczyc and T Ikegami, Chemical Basis for Minimal Cognition,
Articial Life 16, 2010, pp 23343.
12. MM Hanczyc and T Ikegami, Protocells as Smart Agents for Architectural
Design, Technoetic Arts Journal, Vol 7.2, 2009, pp 11720.
13. T Toyota, N Maru, MM Hanczyc, T Ikegami and T Sugawara, Self-
Propelled Oil Droplets Consuming Fuel Surfactant, Journal of the American
Chemical Society 131 (14), 2009, pp 501213.
14. R Armstrong, Living Buildings: Plectic Systems Architecture, Technoetic
Arts Journal, op cit, pp 7994.
15. T Ikegami and MM Hanczyc, The Search for a First Cell Under the
Maximalism Design Principle, Technoetic Arts Journal, op cit, pp 15364.
Text 2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Images: pp 26-8, 30, 33 Martin Hanczyc,
ProtoLife Sri; pp 29, 32 Martin Hanczyc, FLinT
34
Leroy Cronin
35
DEFINING NEW
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
PRINCIPLES WITH
LIVING INORGANIC
MATERIALS
At the University of Glasgow, Leroy Cronin is leading
a group of scientists that are pioneering the engineering
of a fundamentally new approach to building materials,
which scales up from the nano scale to the micro.
Cronin reects on the possibilities of this new paradigm
that gives inorganic cellular materials the potential to be
programmed to sense environmental changes, generate
power, self-repair, shift properties and even compete
with other building materials for resources.
Leroy Cronin, Inorganic Cells, Cronin
Group, University of Glasgow, 2010
Grid of iChells arranged so that inter-
chellular communication is possible,
allowing the exchange of information and
chemicals. The iChells here are around
0.05 millimetres in diameter.
36
Imagine a space that is able to undergo antonomous structural
morphogenesis in response to various stimuli both inside and
outside the structure. In the virtual-reality world this scenario is
already a reality, but in the built material world the technology
is still far from realisation in a practical sense. It is fascinating
that the drive for morphogenically adaptable structures, from
the millimetre, to the tens of metres, is coming not from what is
scientically and technologically possible, but from the push and
evolution in architectural design demanding a fundamentally
more responsive, intimate, tactile and intelligent class of
materials. This is pushing the limits of what is conceivable in
materials science and technology as architects and designers try
to create more sophisticated and intelligent spaces that serve a
multitude of purposes from the functional to the aesthetic.
Also, the development of metaspaces, which change
over time, has been possible thanks to the advent of modern
lighting and materials; for example, transmitting to reective
glass which can be switched as a function of the environment
or the user. Such approaches, which allow the development of
adaptive environments, are extremely interesting for energy-
efcient buildings: programmable spaces, for example. In the
work being carried out by the Cronin Group at the University
of Glasgow, attempts are being made to tame and manipulate
spaces from the nanoscale (a billionth of a metre) to the
micron-scale (a millimetre is 1,000 microns). However, the
focus is not on inanimate materials, but rather on attempting
to engineer a fundamentally new materials paradigm. To dene
this new approach, the group proposes exploiting a new class of
nanoscale inorganic molecules that can be recongured to allow
the fabrication of scalable new building materials and systems
that can emulate living systems (based upon inorganic cellular
materials).
1
Such materials could be programmed to modulate
the environment (temperature, luminosity, humidity), generate
power, self-repair, change mechanical properties, and even
compete with other building organisms for material, information
and resources. The ultimate aim is to reduce the fundamental
building block of building materials from the centimetre (real
bricks, nails, concrete blocks) to the same dimensions as the
building blocks of biology and to produce inorganic cells.
Imagine the outcomes of establishing such a paradigm.
Buildings would have a cellular structure
2
with living inorganic
components that would allow the entire structure to self-repair,
to sense environmental changes, establish a central nervous
system, and even use the environment to sequester water,
develop solar energy systems, and regulate the atmosphere,
internal temperature and humidity using this decentralised
approach. Further, by engineering the cellular system with a
standard information network the entire architecture could
process and distribute vast amounts of information. In fact,
such systems would constitute a type of living technology
where biology and nanotechnology would be fused together.
3
Biological systems themselves are incredibly complex and
the fact that they have been assembled according to a
global evolutionary process means that understanding new
architectural design principles could inform biologists about
how ecosystems develop and vice versa. The most exciting
extrapolation could be the development of inherently
sustainable built environments whereby the sharing of
resources, and the environmental impact of the architecture,
was ameliorated by sustainable interactions between the
surrounding architectures and the environment. For example,
if energy or water was in short supply, then the architecture
may develop water- or solar-collection systems; or if the air was
polluted, it could develop ltration systems to clean the local
atmosphere. The key aspect here is that not only biological
principles would be at work; we could also dene the desirable
positive interactions that support the living architectures. Of
course such control is also open to abuse as well as being used
for positive environmental outcomes.
Let us now focus on how the building blocks are being
developed. Today, the promise of living inorganic materials
is embodied and characterised by self-growing or fabricating
entities that are able to seek out and adapt to new environments
and stimuli, growing from a seed or nucleus that contains
the information or blueprint for the architecture to develop.
4
As this architectural unit develops in time and space, it is able
to both explore the surrounding environment and to adapt or
learn from its surroundings. This means that the design process
is inherently bespoke, whereby the architecture is dened by
a range of chemotactic responses and pathways that lay down
the hard inorganic material skeleton. In this respect the Cronin
Group has been able to develop a micron-scale inorganic
37 77
Biological systems themselves are incredibly complex
and the fact that they have been assembled according to
a global evolutionary process means that understanding
new architectural design principles could inform
biologists about how ecosystems develop and vice versa.
Leroy Cronin, Tubular Architectures, Cronin
Group, University of Glasgow, 2009
opposite left: A collection of inorganic
crystals undergoing a spontaneous
metamorphosis from single ordered crystals
into tubular architectures growing in one
direction following the ow of liquid. The
tube diameter is around 0.001 millimetres
and itself is capable of owing liquids.
The transformation is shown here around
3 minutes from initiation, 10 minutes
after which the crystals have completely
disappeared and the area is densely
packed with tubular architectures.
opposite right: Crystals undergoing
metamorphosis that have traced a
staircase pattern drawn using an external
electrode array to direct the precise path of
the tubular architectures. The diameter of
the tubes is around 0.001 millimetres.
below: View into a sheered tube showing
the cross-section, revealing the edge of the
tube and the rough exterior as well as the
interior. The diameter of the tube is around
0.001 millimetres.
overleaf: Mass of tubular architectures that
have formed at the airwater interface in a
beaker of chemicals.
38
39
40
The key aspect of any living technology is its
potential for autonomous adaptation, and its
application to design and architecture could
be profound in the extreme.
41
fabrication system whereby crystals of inorganic mineral are
refabricated into tubular architectures many thousands of
microns long, with well-dened paths and with tube diameters
of only around 10 microns. These self-growing architectures
5
are
extremely interesting since they can respond to the physical and
chemical environment; they can grow as bres with vast aspect
ratios, and have a well-dened chemical composition.
To be useful, to create systems with this degree of
sophistication requires a robust chemical library of structures
with embedded chemistries that are adaptive, resilient,
environmentally compatible and realisable on a global scale.
The global deployment of such a fundamentally new building
platform, though, should probably not be permitted until we
are able to get to grips with the concepts of articial inorganic
living technology. Although the benets are clear, there are
also dangers that the technology will be misunderstood, abused
or have a negative environmental impact (the most signicant
danger is poor representation in the media, rather than any real
danger). Current research is informing us how the realisation of
such systems will allow us to get to grips with the denition of
life, to allow us to understand how easy or hard it is for living
systems to spontaneously emerge in the universe, and this will
also have a multitude of other implications for humankind.
Just as important, and possibly even more relevant from a
technology point of view, is the impact of living technology on
the architectural world. In this respect, if one subscribes to the
ability of living systems to adapt using evolutionary approaches,
then the impact on design and architecture could be profound.
If the design criteria or specication for the building could be
encoded into a robustness of the building material, then using a
living technology system to evolve towards the product need will
profoundly change our world. In this respect, the only viable route
to a physical living materials technology will be to demonstrate
articial materials that have built-in compatibility and mutual
dependence with the natural world (both living and non-living).
The key aspect of any living technology is its potential
for autonomous adaptation, and its application to design
and architecture could be profound in the extreme. This is
because coupling this property with present-day engineering
paradigms opens up a vast world of material processes and
new building materials, since it combines the approaches of
Leroy Cronin, Combined Tubular and
Cellular Architectures, Cronin Group,
University of Glasgow, 2010
The inorganic chemical cell can develop
and tolerate a range of chemistries and
also extrude tubular architectures that
could act as sensors, feeding pipes and
transport networks to move chemicals
around the system.
42 42 42
Leroy Cronin, Outerspace and Innerspace
at the Nanoscale, Cronin Group,
University of Glasgow, 2010
below: Actual image of a nanoscale wheel
cluster that has captured, or been found
with, a perfect templating molecule.
Leroy Cronin, Inorganic Cells, Cronin
Group, University of Glasgow, 2010
opposite: View of a nested set of inorganic
cells, or iChells, showing that it is possible
to encapsulate a range of inorganic
architectures within the cell. The cells are
robust and self-repairing as well as able
to encapsulate and tolerate a range of
chemical environments. The diameter of
the iChells is congurable and can range
from 0.01 to 10 millimetres.
43
extremely important. In some respects the concepts and ideas
embodied by living inorganic cells goes way beyond biology, but
this potential has not yet been made into a hardware reality.
In terms of new materials design, if living or adaptive
materials are to be realised and employed in real architectures,
then the requirement of the minimum chemical infrastructure
to establish a complex system using molecular building blocks
is absolutely key, and it is vital to consider the design at the
molecular, nanoscale level. At such scales, the design and
assembly of protein-sized (around a billionth of a metre in
diameter) inorganic metal-oxide clusters gives a good example
of complex inorganic nanoscale architectures that surely can
scale up to the macro-world with dramatic effect.
6
But perhaps
the most profound metaphysical aspect of the development
of living materials would be the position of the designer or
architect. No longer would the architect be creating a space
that is as inexible as before, but instead an adaptive, living,
morphologically transient space that could develop over
time in a profoundly more exible way. No longer would the
imagination of the architect be static; it would evolve in such
a way that the encoding of the structure would shift his or her
role from architect to creator. 1
Notes
1. D-L Long and L Cronin, Towards Polyoxometalate-Integrated Nano
Systems, Chemistry A European Journal, Vol 12, 2006, pp 3698706.
2. L Cronin, N Krasnogor, BG Davis, C Alexander, N Robertson, JHG Steinke,
SLM Schroeder, AN Khlobystov, G Cooper, PM Gardner, P Siepmann, BJ
Whitaker and D Marsh, The Imitation Game A Computational Chemical
Approach to Recognizing Life, Nature Biotechnology, Vol 24, 2006, pp
12036.
3. L Cronin, in M Bedau, P Guldborg Hansen, E Park and S Rasmussen (eds),
Living Technology, 5 Questions, Automatic Press (Milton Keynes), 2010, Chp
5, pp 5566.
4. C Ritchie, GJT Cooper, Y-F Song, C Streb, H Yin, ADC Parenty, DA
MacLaren and L Cronin, Spontaneous Assembly and Real-Time Growth
of Micron-Scale Tubular Structures from Polyoxometalate-Based Inorganic
Solids, Nature Chemistry, Vol 1, 2009, pp 4752.
5. GJT Cooper and L Cronin, Real-Time Direction Control of Self-Fabricating
Polyoxometalate-Based Microtubes, Journal of the American Chemical
Society, Vol 131, (2009), pp 83689.
6. HN Miras, GJT Cooper, D-L Long, H Bgge, A Mller, C Streb and L Cronin,
Unveiling the Transient Template in the Self-Assembly of a Molecular Oxide
Nano-Wheel, Science, Vol 327, 2010, pp 724.
Text 2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Images Leroy Cronin, The University of
Glasgow, 2010
design and evolution with the idea of autonomous and adaptive
matter. This implies that the entire process of evolution of the
matter occurs in the chemosphere (chemical world). Similar
to biology, such material approaches could benet from using
cellular components as the minimal units of the living inorganic
material. Like biological cells, these inorganic chemical cells,
or iChells, can be programmed to interact with each other. It
would be fascinating to link the tubular and cellular systems;
the combination of tube structures with cells would provide a
route to networking the inorganic cellular blocks and would
even allow the formation of structures based on such systems via
the formation of tubular architectures, which may lead to the
assembly of electronically programmable units that are already
present in the building material.
If evolution can be engineered to occur in living,
unsophisticated building blocks, then it may well be possible to
evolve sophisticated materials with properties as yet inaccessible
with conventional technologies. Indeed, improving the use of
evolutionary synthetic techniques could allow the evolution of
environmentally perfect materials. This would mean that the
specication for the materials and the design brief would be
presented as the evolutionary tness parameter that would be
sought during the growth adaptation process. In this concept,
the material used in the building design would initially be
suited, but not perfect, and only over time would it adapt,
evolve, improve and dynamically address the tness parameter.
This could mean the continual evolution of the material and the
architecture as the result of changing environmental conditions:
pollution, heating or cooling, humidity, available energy and so
on. Thus the potential to embed scalable computing elements
within the materials so that they could become intelligent
could also be an interesting concept, especially the idea of
producing cellular materials that could signal between cells, and
could compute and adapt.
The functional implications for such materials are profound,
and the functionaesthetic aspect is equally intriguing. Self-
healing buildings with peer-to-peer information storage,
distributed processing as well as energy harvesting could also
be embedded. Although the idea of inorganic living materials is
coming closer, the use of the robust nature of inorganic materials
in combination with the adaptive nature of living systems is
44
JJ Grandville ( Jean Ignace Isidore Grard)
The Dragon