Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Done by:
Somreeta Das
(12AR60R35)
CONTENT S:
AIMS, OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY. TESSELLATION:
ORIGIN AND BRIEF HISTORY. APPROACH TO PHYSICAL PLANNING. CONTEXTUAL NEED IN INDIA.
CASE STUDY II
CASE STUDY III INFERENCES FROM CASE STUDIES
A house is more than just a house, A home is where individuals live and rejuvenate, where there is space for children to grow and mature; Its a home that defines how families live and interact, because it is the home environment that. . . . . . shapes a community.
A I M S , O B J E C T I V E S & M E T H O D O L O G Y:
A I M To analyze the Physical Planning aspects of Tessellation Planning/ Honeycomb Housing in High Density Housing in Indian context.
FROM LITERATURE REVIEWS: Understanding Tessellation Planning & High Density Housing (in general) and in Indian context.
FROM CASE - STUDIES: O B J E C T I V E S Analyzing the case studies of tessellation planning and determine and discuss its potentials and limitations over conventional planning at solving the problems that emerged in the P.O.E. analysis of existing high density housing.
METHODOLOGY: The methodology was accomplished in three stages as follows: STAGE I: The literature studies: that added to the knowledge base and gave a deeper insight into the idea of tessellation and high density housing and how each could possibly be correlated to each other. STAGE II: The case studies: which provided an overall outlook as to how the different types of tessellation units were instrumental in promotion of the positive features of planning using tessellation. STAGE III: The investigative experiment: that established the fact that, practically, if only physical aspects of tessellation were considered, then tessellation could be a viable option for high density planning in Indian context.
complex designs can be built up from basic tile patterns in a simple way by
this process.
Starting from Fig.1 Fig.9. The base tile (i.e. Fig.1) gets tessellated around the 45 axis to formulate the single geometric pattern (as we see in fig.9) of the ancient Moorish tile of the 15th century.
Fig.1 Fig.2 Fig.3
Fig.6
Fig.5
Fig.4
Fig.7
Fig.8
Fig.9
The idea of tessellation planning is to formulate neighbourhood and not mere creation of a community.
Based on the following design principles: Centre the school. Place arterial streets along the perimeter.
According to Perry, an ideal neighbourhood unit should comprise of a population of 1500 DUs.
THE GROUP OF SEXTUPLEIX: 6 HOUSES IN A BLOCK/ PER UNIT. THE GROUP OF QUADRUPLEIX: 4 HOUSES IN A BLOCK/ PER UNIT. THE TWIN TYPE DUPLEIX: 2 HOUSES IN A SINGLE UNIT.
Different types of DU types are used for tessellation planning. However the basic types used are as mentioned in the box above. Over the due course of evolution of this planning concept, tessellation planning has seen many changes in the types of its DUs which got changed as per the minor modification required as per the plot size and shape. Nonetheless, the basic DU types are fixed and are the standardized version of the tessellation DU types are the Even Multiple Units i.e. dupleix (two), qudrupleix (four) , sextupleix (six),etc. However, usually, greater than six dwelling units per block is not used taking into account the factors of climatology such as light and ventilation.
NOTE: Though different modifications of aforementioned units: dupleixes, quadrupleixes and sextupleixes are used, these are the basic units for hexagonal tessellation pattern.
10
This case study is the first prototype for tessellation planning, as carried out by the pioneer of Honeycomb Housing Concept - Architect Mazlin Ghazali.
When Architect Ghazali had used tessellation for the first time, as in case of this residential housing project at Sarawak, then it was not done with an intention of incorporating high density housing as an integral part of this kind of planning. Hence, normal housing with required number of dwelling units were designed and constructed.
The aforementioned concept set in only after there was a dire need to house a huge population within a particular area of an already existing industrial township of Demak Laut, Kutching, Malaysia as a part of the extension of land that had been left initially for
future utilization.
11
Started as a industrial estate, Demak Laut, Kutching, Malaysia had certain pockets left for future expansion when initially planned. One such zone was the one as seen on the right side figure. This zone was about 19 acres in size. The two different layouts terrace housing as well as honeycomb housing - were proposed by Architect Ghazali, who was the main architect for the project. Terrace housing and tessellation planning (Honeycomb housing) showed great deviation in the no. of DU apart from the other features such as green areas, concreted areas, etc. Where terrace housing portrayed lesser green spaces and huge concreted area, great road length and road area; there tessellation was unbelievably sustainable with more green areas, lesser road lengths and road area and marginal amount of concreted spaces. The no. of DUs for terrace housing and tessellation housing being kept same, it was found that the terrace housing for the same area went upto a height of G+3 whereas tessellation went till a height of G+1. The final conclusion drawn based on the project was that if gone higher, tessellation couldve housed many more.
12
This student housing was built as a model for introducing the concept of Apartment Housing in Honeycomb housing. The idea was also to do the Post Occupancy Evaluation (P.O.E) at a later date to ascertain its sustainability in the long run. The model settlement system, that housed mostly undergraduates and a few post graduates as well as a small population of PhD scholars, witnessed a revolutionary change in the single entity ideology of the tessellation planning that had existed till date. It was proved that tessellation housing could go till an elevation of as much as G+4 to as much as G+9 (moderate rise). Also another fact that came to limelight was that a section of the site being quite sloped and undulating (slope being almost 1 in 5), tessellation planning could be carried out without any hassles. This proved that tessellation planning could also be done on considerable slopes.
13
14
3600sq.ft.
INDEX OF OTHER SPACES IN THE LAYOUT PLAN Public semi-public spaces Commercial and retail spaces Flexible community spaces Green pockets/lawns COMMUNITY SPACE
15
COMPARISON OF ADDITIONAL FEATURES GREEN SPACES (AREA) ROAD AREA ROAD LENGTH CONCRETED AREA
TYPE OF PLANNING CONVENTIONAL PLANNING 15% OF TOTAL AREA 32500 sq.m. 4.5 kms 37% OF TOTAL AREA TESSELLATION PLANNING 25% OF TOTAL AREA 21000 sq.m. 3.3 kms 26% OF TOTAL AREA
The above tables were generated as the outcome of the experiment. It gave some stunning results that were not idealized when tessellation planning had originally been taken up for high density planning and are as follows: 10%increase in green spaces. 12% reduction in road area. 1.2kms reduction in road length. 11% reduction of total concreted area.
This encourages the use of tessellation to be taken up for planning purpose. However, as the economic aspects of such form of planning in Indian context has not been done earlier, a feasible option would be to experiment by introducing it on small scale model settlement systems.
16
POSSIBLE LIMITATIONS:
ROLE OF SOCIAL ETHICS AND GROUPING: The classification of social groups, stratifications and cultural morphologies in the social structure: Determines if the model will be readily accepted. EQUITABLE INCOME PARITY: As it is not attainable, mixed type of honeycombs may not be
17
18