V2

Questions to an anonymous individual with responses, beginning January 2009. [This update July, 2009]
Unedited with the exception of removal of greetings and basic punctuation.

Q. What shall I learn? What is most important for me to learn in this life?
A. Learn why you are here.
Everything happens for a reason. And that is a good place to begin trying to decipher reason itself..

Q. Why am I here?
A. To learn the lessons provided by this experience..
They are unique to this particular plane of existence..
What this means is that there are infinite other realms which are rich in conscious existence on an individualized
scale..
However, the vast majority of these fit into something more like polar extremes, so to speak..
Those being that either the entities involved are living in what you would consider to be a "utopian" existence in a
conscious state, or they are engaged in what should be labeled as "2nd density awareness existence." What this means
is that they live via instinct in a deeply physical state, without the need for nor the ability to contemplate their own
existence..
on this plane, there are aspects of both..
The "dog eat dog" nature of primal physical being, but with the intellectual capacity to contemplate the "meaning of it
all." This provides a most "challenging" environment. But at the same time, it also offers unique opportunity for highly
accelerated spiritual growth.
Believe it or not, most actually *choose* to come here and experience this environment, difficult though it may be for
most.

Q. Ok, what do you mean by plane - do you refer to the Earth, this universe or other?
A. In this instance, "plane" simply means a realm of perceived physical being.
Perhaps "material" would better describe that.
Perceived material existence.
Could be a planet, could be something else.
The exact nature of a plane is not so important as the fact that there is a plane to begin with.

Q. What do you mean by spiritual growth or what constitutes spiritual growth?

A. The bottom line is that you are here to experience this.
Since the experience itself is important and offers a unique opportunity for fast-track learning.
There is no question that most will find this existence to be difficult or trying, for the most part.
But that is to be expected.
Only exceptions are those who are quite "shallow" or lacking in sensitivity.
For those who are more sensitive than average, a pin prick feels like a knife wound.

Q. Ok. Why are there evil people?

A. What is "evil?"
In your view, that is.
Also, what is "good?"
Q. People that do bad things or hurt others?
A. OK.. now look at the motivation for same.
What would that be, as a typical example which comes to your mind?
Q. To gain for themself or out of anger, hate, beliefs
A. Well.. the main point is for personal gain.. of some sort or another.. or.. perceived personal gain, to fulfill a desire, for
instance.
The point here is that "evil," "bad," "good" and the like are entirely subjective.
What is "good" to one is seen as "evil" to another.
Now this may seem trite, but it is of extreme importance.
 It is not trite
for instance..
say you have a large colony of insects which have taken up residence in your home..
you decide that these insects pose a health risk to you and your loved ones..
so, you undertake to eliminate them, or in other words, conduct an exercise in insecticide.
this you may view as "good" but the insects surely would not.. or at least they would not if they had the ability to think
analytically.
the insects might see you as "evil."
after all, they did not choose (supposedly) the nature of their being; of their existence. And they did choose to locate in
your home. However, this was done via instinct.
their purpose in locating there was not to deliberately cause harm to you. It was an exercise in survival on a mass scale,
and an effort to thrive in their natural way.

Q. What about an insect that carries a disease - like a mosquito - we kill them to protect ourselves - is that ok?
A. certainly. Likewise, it is OK for the Earth to choose to kill humans via natural processes.
for precisely the same reason(s).
or it should be said, these processes *appear* to be "natural." Question is, are they really?
one does not know, normally.

Q. So we kill the mosquitoes and other things and the Earth kills us? How can we live in peace or can we?
A. OK..
The point here is not to confound you.
rather, it is to broaden the overall perspective.
the issue at hand is the classic one, isn't it?
that which is defined as "evil" by most or many, is merely an intense exercise in service to self.
that which is often viewed as "good" by most is, at least to some extent, an exercise in service to others.
and therein lies the only real difference. Otherwise, it is all subjective.
Look at it this way..
when referencing the humans, vis-a-vis the Earth, the question then becomes this..
To what extent are the humans concerned about their effect upon the Earth?
and to what extent do they undertake to maximise any possible positive interaction with the Earth and to what extent
do they tend to maximise negative impacts? Further, what is the underlying motivation for either of the above options?
now let us return to your original question, given this new angle of thinking..
what constitutes an evil person?
what constitutes a good person?
how does one differentiate?
and finally, is either "good" or "evil" in this example interchangeable according to viewpoint or perspective?
Q. An action that seeks to gain for the self could be "evil" while an action that seeks to give to another could be "good".
Is that correct?
A. Possibly. But it is not quite that simple either.
Q. What we are trying to point out here is the subjectivity inherent in your original question, " Why are there evil
people?"
by becoming aware of the true definitions, you can then answer the question yourself, to a great extent, yes?
and *that* in turn is merely an effort to teach (others) how to practice independent thought and analytical thinking.
These are important because they open ALL doorways to self-teaching and unlimited discovery/learning.
Q. Well it would be relative would it not? If one person takes more than another they may be seen as evil, but both might
be seen as relatively good if they take much less than another individual. Is this what you mean?
A. Adolph Hitler, for one example that most would think of, thought of himself and his National Socialist Party as the
epitome of good. Others saw it differently.

[Session ended]

Q. How may I be a better or a good person?

A. By asking yourself that question and then trusting the answer(s) or response(s). Then apply that trust into action,
following your instinct.
 now understand..
The key is for one to ask oneself that question. How many do that and how often?
Q. Well it seems many are too busy to think much about it or some times there are other beliefs or ideals which are in play,
such as religion or social values for example. How does justice fit in?
A. OK, that is a bit of a jumbled question. If you please, one at a time.
or..
please clarify. In other words, how does justice fit in where? Or with what exactly?

Q. Ok, well in society there is justice which is basically a term for if you can be proven guilty you will suffer depending
on what you have done and what some people decide. I guess the first part is the concept of punishment - could you
comment on this please?
A. Interesting. What you said in comment here: Well it seems many are too busy to think much about it or some times
there are other beliefs or ideals which are in play, such as religion or social values for example fits in with your
question.
Why should there be a need for "justice" if not for those concepts which you outline above?
And would all of this not be made moot if everyone asked themselves how they can make themselves into a "better or
good person?"
Q. It would help I guess, however what about those which refuse to change or ask the question or those that are stuck 'in a
loop' -like a drug addict perhaps- and also a child which misbehaves?
A. Well..
really, this is avoiding a careful analysis of the concept being put forth here..
you say that some "refuse to change." This is doubtful. No one refuses to change once they have taken inventory upon
themselves via their own conscience.
Same thing applies with being "stuck in a loop."
as for a child who misbehaves...
well, that is a bit more complex.
Children, as the term is applied in this world represents a physical being whose soul is still in the process of
awakening.. as such, "misbehaviour" is actually a function of interaction with others.. the result of programs that are in
the process of being installed into the mind of the soul which is in the process of awakening.
By nature, "misbehaviour" does not exist without stimulus, except in the rare cases where it is a function of
physical/mental illness.
In such cases.. obviously the remedy (if one is available) is proper treatment.

Q. Could you comment on the concept we have of discipline? First in relation to applying discipline to others and then
discipline of the self please.
A. Those are two entirely different things.
Discipline of others is an effort at control of others.
Discipline of self is mislabeled. That is a function of discretionary behaviour stemming, again, from self-examination
and determination.
Ask yourself..
why discipline?
meaning discipline of others?
what is the purpose of this?
again, through a careful analysis, the answers become self-evident, do they not?
now here is the next step...
if you dare..
Q. Yes, I gather it is always a case of the one trying to discipline attempting to get what they want, be it for society or
another, it is still based on their view and thoughts.
A. Connect the two. If all ask themselves how to make themselves better or "good" as it were, is there a need for further
control?
Precisely, to your comment.
It is all about control.
Q. I see
A. Really, nothing more than that. One could make the argument that it is sometimes needed. Perhaps so. But then *why*
is it needed? Therein lies the real answer here.
and here is something else that most do not realise..
 children do not misbehave, as such, when in the process of undertaking the basic functions of instinct, such as occurs
in the very early stages of childhood..
This is a stage of exploration, essentially, which takes place when the child needs only to be protected from possible
harm, which can come from various sources..
however... once the consciousness begins to flourish in a pragmatic state, there is no need for "punishment" unless one
is facillitating control, or making an effort to do so.
Now admittedly, this is a difficult concept to comprehend. But if one makes the effort, it is well worth it with regard to
the results.
As for after the conscious being has fully re-emerged within the physical state, again, there is no concern with
misbehaviour unless one is failing to affect an introspective self-examination.

[session ended]

Q. There seems to be quite a bit regarding fear and love as being very important or all that there is to focus on. Could you
speak about this please - fear and love?
A. Fear is a control program, the primary one in fact.
Love is simply the recognition of inclusion by all.
Fear would not exist but for instilled ignorance.
"Love" is deliberately misinterpreted by most.
And/or misplaced.
Q. Ok, so the removal of fear is done by gaining knowledge or learning?
A. Yes, absolutely.
When one has supreme knowledge, what is left to fear?
Fear can only exist in an environment of ignorance.
Q. Ok, could you speak more on what love is - that is if it is defineable - some seem to think or believe it is not - your
thoughts please.
A. Love is all-knowing.
And knowing all.
Q. Anything else?
A. Well, you ask that question only when looking for something else. So what is it that you are looking for?
Unless you think there is something missing, you do not ask, "anything else."
Q. Good point, I would not be looking if I already knew - is this correct or what you mean?
A. If you think there is something missing, then you lack satisfaction with the response.
Best thing to do then is ponder the full meaning of the response. For insight.
Q. Ok.
A. You have seen others attempt to describe/define
David Icke is one. "Infinite Love"
That is a good one.
Think about that. What does it mean?
Good description, yes?
"Infinite love"
It reverberates all sorts of meaning, in one simple, two word sentence.
Echoes of truths reverberate from everywhere with that one.
Infinite love
Q. Ok, thank you.
I have another question on another topic - the "law of attraction". Is this law as it is called true or correct?
A. Those are rather clumsy words. Sometimes semantics work, sometimes they do not.
other languages besides this one can be more reflective and more accurately descriptive in cases such as this.
and that is because they are constructed differently.. taking the tack of expressing feeling and spiritual content rather
than cold, harsh, materialistic definition.
Try Mandarin Chinese
There is an example of a language which could describe correctly something akin to a "law of attraction."
On the other hand, "Infinite Love" does just happen to work in this language.
Q. Ok, could you speak of any actual affect or happening from the so-called "law of attraction"?
A. A convergence of all matter and of all energy into a spherical union.
Which is what nature always seeks.. a "union with (the) one" as you have seen described before.
Q. I see.
A. It is also the ultimate destination
Which you also know
All consciousness emanates from one source.
There is no separation, only the illusion of that. Which again foments control
Q. So we - we including everything not just people - are from the one source and progress toward returning to the one
source - is this correct or could you correct any errors I have made?
A. No, that is correct
There is only one consciousness.
The fragmentation into the illusion of infinite units of consciousness only happens for the sake of exacting a 100%
inclusive experience.
Q. Could you speak of the progression please - is it inevitable and how exactly do we progress?
A. Yes it is inevitable. What is not determinable though is how precisely it will be accomplished.
One could also say "when" it will be accomplished but there is no when, really.
So best to leave it merely as how.
Q. What may hinder or help progress?
A. Not correct concept.
Not hinder or help. Simply choice/selection.
Which path chosen? Which path taken? Which path unfolds, which path is followed?
Q. What do you mean by "path"?
A. How.
That is what is meant by path.
Q. Could you explain what you mean by how please?
A. This is really quite complicated.
Q. But the answer is hidden in the last few answers.
A. You asked about inevitability.
Is it inevitable.
Yes it is. But with so-called "free will," this can only be if the open question is how it will unfold.
What exactly will be the final result of this successful completion of the union with the one?
And this will only be seen and perceived by the one consciousness when it is ready to do so.
What exactly will take place,
what exactly will happen.
Now..
Realise too that all of this is a grossly over-simplistic concept only because it has to be.. in this forum. Obviously there
is far, far more to all this than that. But for now, all that is needed to be known is the general idea.. not the infinite
number of details about "how"
Q. Ok, well it is quite helpful and thought provoking.

[session ended]

Q. [Question or comment regarding progress/learning/development triggered the following]

A.. When someone is reading a website, a book, a journal, whatever... When someone is watching a documentary film or
TV programme, when one is attending a lecture, a class or a seminar.. what are they doing, exactly? Let's start there.
Q. One is always learning or learning in potential.
A. Yes, but that is not my point.
What they are doing more specifically is trying to access information which is being presented by someone else.
another terrestrial human, normally.
yes?
Q. yes...
A. Then the question you ask them is why are they dong that? You see, this is really so obvious, it is the proverbial
"hiding in plain sight" thing again.
Why are they doing that when somehow, somewhere, there must have been an *original* source for all of this
information. Correct?
Q.Yes. They are seeking externally whilst (possibly) neglecting an internal search when in actuality the information be it
external or internal is derived from the same source.
A. Precisely. Now of course YOU know that. Problem is, so many others have never even thought of it.
Instead, if they have even attempted to think of it..
They have believed the obviously idiotic programming, which says that somehow, some way, someone somewhere
"generated" the thought literally inside of their own brain.
Q. "That's just your imagination" would be one example.
A. That is impossible. Brains/minds do not generate anything. Instead, they are receivers and transmitters only.
Only many never figure this out, that one is perfectly capable of not only receiving information but retrieving it at will.
All inventions, for one example, started that way. All of them.
Q. We can all potentially create though can we not?
A. They were not invented as such. They were retrieved, period.
Q. The creation spans all minds simultaneously in potential does it not?
A. Creation is really not possible when all things possible have already been created and always have been, always were,
always will be.
Instead, we just bring them into our perceived realm.
From the infinite consciousness.

A. Sure, you can "create a book," for instance. But really, you are just retrieving and sorting.
And then presenting.
Q. Yes it is a good point - in an infinite universe all possibilities are (in linear time) all present and therefore may be
accessed at any time. Across all time, all is accessed.
A. "I dreamt it up in my own head." Umm.. no, not really. What you did was to retrieve it. But it works the same, for
the sake of argument..
the point is, when it is possible to "dream" something up, then it is also possible to "dream" anything and everything
up. And THAT is the same thing as retrieving or accessing.
So, all is available, if only one knows that it is and then trusts their ability to actually be able to get it. That is where
the false programming comes in, telling us over and over and over and over that we cannot do that. Nonsense. But of
course you must be programmed to think that you "can't" do that, lest you not discover that you can indeed.
I tell people that one good way to get the process rolling is to start a conversation with themselves.. but telepathically,
no voice needed. Just ask "yourself" a question and then retrieve the answer.
there is one bit of a hitch, however.
Q. Although we tend to view things as the product of thought - of the self - which is not a complete understanding.
A. These poor folks.. because of that damn programming again..
They ask the question and then shut down, expecting an externalised answer.
wrong.
it does not work that way. You ask and then you answer.
that is the key.
you ask.. you also answer.
but "your" answer is not really yours.
they expect a booming voice to blast into their heads, poor fools.
Q. well division as part of the programming - or more accurately the percept of division - is part of it since one would
then say, if it is not mine it must be someone elses, so who's is it...
A. See.. all this programming has produced such ridiculous imagery.. and the people, they have bought it all.
Exactly. The illusion of separation.
there IS NO separation. There is no division.

Q. [A Discussion of aliens began...]

A. The aliens unlock the door to a greater understanding at all levels.
This is precisely and specifically why the reality of their/its existence is so broadly and fiercely resisted from terrestrial
human sectors of power.
In other words, once the mass consciousness of the terrestrial human neighbourhood or sector of conscious awareness
makes the quantum leap of full knowledge and recognition of a Universal community, so to speak, then the perception
 shifts, thus the reality shifts, thus the shackles which allow for the control come off and thus it really is "The End of
the World as We Have Known It"
Henceforth, that wrinkle within the larger blanket of consciousness which is currently folded back upon itself, thus
facilitating a wholly unnatural pyramidal structure of control over others is unwrinkled and there is no longer the
concept of "power" and "control" as it has long been experienced here.
Q Yes, that I would certainly agree with - perhaps with the requirement that the awareness is undeniable to the masses to
surpass any programming - primarily the heavily religious types.
Q. And I would say the 'perception shift' is a key point in what you have said
A. Yes, it is THE key point, in essence.
With perception shift, on a mass consciousness scale, comes literal physical reality shift. This is what is behind the
concept of "densities" in their whole and in terms of their definition; their meaning.
That physical or material realm which one experiences is wholly dependent upon the degree of conscious awareness.
And nothing much else.
Further evidence, yet again, that it was consciousness that has/had eternal existence whereas material existence is
purely transitory.
And you see, to get back to the central theme, it is the alien presence/existence (from our perspective, that is) which is
the lynch pin holding together the intersection between two realities.
Now you see, now you know why there is resistance to an utterly ridiculous extent, to the allowance or admission of
the alien presence. This must be kept bottled up in order to maintain this all important status quo. Once everyone on
this plane becomes aware of what is really going on, it is game over, so to speak.
I wanted to add that it is not just the religious institutions which are affected by this. It is also government, media, any
sort of academic institution, anything that represents any one or all of the bricks which make up the tower of power
which is affected, and essentially brought down completely by this. There again, you see why so the resistance.
Further..
Q. With regards to suppression of the alien presence - many would simply say it is all via the NWO pushers (us vs them
percept again) - would you comment on this? I see 4th density interactivity a key aspect in maintaining this agenda - in
that it would require a level of simultaneous control of the information via thoughts of all people interacting in some
way with UFO/ETs
A. It is those at the "ordinary" or "everyday people" level who are in fact in tune with or in sync with the currently
existing setup, who are also personally resistant to the existence of others from elsewhere.
and this also delineates for you just who it is that is ready to make a transition to a higher level of existence/awareness,
and who is not ready for that.
roughly, this breaks down right through the middle, it is sort of "50/50" in ratio. And it has remained there for quite
some time, oddly enough, in spite of what seems to be all sorts of advancements on the ability to gain higher-level-
knowledge-front.
But not just those in power, of course. There are a lot of "ordinary" types in that group as well.
there is too a difference between resistance, or failure to accept when confronted with facts and real knowledge, and
simple ignorance due to lack of exposure.
or perhaps I should say, lack of *proper* (levels of and types of) exposure.
This is why it is also important to try to offer opportunities for others, in your midst, to gain this
exposure/knowledge/awareness, whenever possible.

A. What has been on your mind lately, in an esoteric or important sense? That should be the topic.
Q. Definition and method(s) to progress
A. Progress..
Well, that is both complex and easy.
Progress is best defined as a continuance of one's path, as held within one's own awareness.
in other words..
If one is following their interests, or what drives them, then that is progress.
now..
It could also be said that anything and everything is progress. But that would be in a different sense..
And it is true, of course.
However, only in the sense that all experiences which derive from all that takes place in one's sentient existence is
progress, after a fashion.
But *true* progress is when one is not distracted from one's purpose..
 You see..
All have come into each incarnation for a purpose.. something which is paramount for the schedule of why they have
incarnated into their specific circumstance..
and when one is flowing with the natural energy which corresponds directly to that purpose, this is the best definition
of "progress."
More importanly..
importantly..
it is easy to tell the difference between this and any other experience.
the feeling is what makes the distinction. This is something that everyone has experienced, and most especially, you
yourself.
and that, in turn, is essentially the method.
When you are following your principle or designated path, it feels entirely different than does any other experience. In
fact, it feels quite literally effortless.
if you are feeling a "drag" or feeling as if you are merely plodding along, then this is not following your designated
path.
When not doing this, it feels "right" to you. And therein lies the difference. This is really all that one needs to know
about how to provide a methodology to maximise progress, as in terms of the meaning behind your question.

A. In short, if it feels right, then this is what was intended by one, before they came into this incarnation.
if it requires effort, in the truest sense, then this is not the designated path.
always remember that.
the key word.. is "passion."
what is your passion?
what interests you to the extent that it never tires or bores you?
so you see, this makes it fairly easy, does it not?

Q. What is channeling?
A. Channeling is simply...
word escapes here.
drawing from the Universal or infinite truth.
Q. Accessing?
A. Which exists everywhere but is actually accessed within.
yes, accessing.
and it is something that anyone and everyone can do, though you have been very, very strongly programmed to think
otherwise.
When one is actually channeling, and not performing something that would be the equivalent of a "stage act," then one
is accessing only truth, and nothing else.
On occasion, this can be corrupted, of course, by "noise" that comes from other, and external sources. However, this
will not happen often, especially when one is doing this naturally, and not trying to "perform on cue," so to speak.
Now, let's discuss a method for actually channeling..
Since that should be the next question..
The best way is to carry on a conversation with oneself, in order to get the process started.. and by this we mean within
one's own mind, not aloud, necessarily.
Ask yourself a question, then provide the answer.
now..
This sounds, to most, like something akin to an impossibility.
But that is not true at all. It is quite easy. All one needs to do is lose the prejudice which has been installed as a
program (shield) to prevent this from happening.
Later, when you have practised this to perfection, you can channel when others are asking the question.
one bit of advice..
it helps, just to get started, if one tries this the first time with a subject which...
A. they have an interest in, a natural knowledge about, for instance..
B. In which they have studied quite a bit.. by accessing the written or spoken works of others, which was, in itself,
channelled, at its origination (if truth be known), and...
 C. Which is of something greater than the mundane in importance. This does not mean that it has to be something
esoteric, universal in importance, or of other such subject matter. However, it is best that it be a subject which is not
artificially constricted in our experience.. or narrowly focused, for instance.
at first..
when one does the above, asking a question and then providing the answer, the action will be just what your
preconceived notions are telling you it would be.. just a forced act that represents something of an exercise in futility.
but...
sooner or later, you will be most surprised to find that the answers will begin to flow from something that is another
source, for lack of a better description, but still coming from within you. The information will be accessed from within
AND from without, all at once.
And finally, once this process starts and then continues, you will find that you can do this with greater and greater
ease. It will become natural to you. And after all is said and done, you will be made aware that it was always with you,
that you had done it already, though you did not realise this, and that what is retrieved through this process is valid, to
the greatest extent imaginable.
Channeling, when it is real, is nothing at all like what has been portrayed in the popular culture.
when you see someone in the public realm, who claims the ability to "speak to the dead," for instance, be very wary of
that.
This is not to say that this cannot be done, it certainly can. However..
the key here is that it most definitely is not done *on cue* as demonstrated in these examples. And notice too that very
rarely does such an individual say this:
"I'm sorry, I am not picking up anything at all from your departed loved one..."
although precisely that would in fact happen, quite a lot, if the practise is or was genuine.
They never say: "Your grandfather says you were a liar, still are a liar, and you'd better watch yourself or you're about
to land in jail..."
even though, in some cases, that could be an accurate description.
Also, the profit motive is not where this sort of energy normally resides. The former is an artificial construct
completely, and more importantly, is a thoroughly limiting form of energy, whereas the latter is the opposite.

--The sessions are still being held presently, every few weeks when possible. This document will be added to or updated
as new sessions are completed. A version number has been added to the top right corner of page 1.

--Feel free to e-mail any questions, including questions to be asked to the individual to dean09@myway.com
Any questions will be asked where possible at the next available session.