Professional Documents
Culture Documents
\
:
LOUH
~J
c
O ~Z
J
~O
~4
LJ.OUU, Z.JUU
J Z O
Time [psec]
Fig, 1. Time domain traces of the detected THz
signals. The traces were vertically and horizontally
shifed for clarity. G and S denote the gap length and
the spot diameter, respectively,
:
O
T
c
~
1
1
'
LOUU
1
O.4UU
9.5mW
1
Z O4 O
Frequency [THz]
Fig. 2. Amplitude spectra of the THz pulses shown in
Fig. 1. The traces were not shifed.
Figure 3 shows the peak-to-peak amplitude
of the observed THz pulses as a fnction of the
incident power to the detector PCA for the three
combinations of the gap-length and the spot size. The
amplitude increases as !, which is consistent to
the previous reports[5]. / important point is that the
super-linearity is hold even if the spot size is reduced
to 2.1 1m.
Here, let us discuss the spot area dependence of
the THz signal. The current signal obtained in the
measurement may be expressed as
J o nWDETHz o (r WDETHz, (1)
where W, D, ETH" 1 and are the width of the
current region, thickness of the LTG layer, electric
feld induced by the THz wave across the gap,
excitation power, and the area of the excitation,
respectively, and the photo-carrier density n was
assumed to be nonlinear as suggested by the
nonlinear increase of the signal to the incident power.
One may assume that the width of the current region
is determined by the spot diameter, which may by
:
O
C
.
m 1
C
m
3
~
1
'
'
'
J J J 1
Power [mW
Fig. 3. Incident power dependence of the
detectedTHz amplitude
LJ.OUU, Z.JUU
LOUU, O.OUU
J LOUU, O.4UU
c
pe=-1.5 C
m
3
|
LJUU, J.OUU
Fig. 4. Relation between the THz signal and the spot
size.
justifed for the spot size not much different fom the
geometrical width of the gap. For a given 1 and ETH"
one may expect that the signal divided by the width
is proportional to Figure 4 shows such a plot.
The experimental values are ftted with a value of
m=1.5. Though the value seems to be consistent on
frst sight to the values m=1.3 1.4 obtained in the
power dependence of the signal amplitude, we
suspect that the assumption of the constant ETHz for
different PCA gap is not correct. According to the
antenna theory, not the electric fled but the voltage
is determined in an open gap of the linear antenna for
a given incident feld. Therefore, ETHz can be higher
for shorter gap length, which leads to the larger value
of m in the plot as shown in Fig. 4. In the conference,
we will discuss the possibility of enhancing ETHz in a
short gap PCA.
Finally, we show the case of 2.7 1m spot size
for the 1.5 1m gap PCA. Depicted in Fig. 5 are the
time domain signal and the amplitude spectra of the
obtained THz pulses. For comparison, the results
obtained in the 5 1m gap PCA were replotted in the
Figure. The peak to peak amplitude is an order of
magnitude larger in the 2.7 1m spot case with
negligible change in the spectral shape compared
with the 5 1m gap PCA. However, the signal to noise
Z
1
L~OUU, ~O.4UU
--
~O
-4
9.5mW
G=15um, Z.UH
1 Z
Time [psec]
L1.OUU
Z.1UH
1
U Z O 4 O
Frequency [THz]
Fig. 5. Time domain traces and the amplitude spectra
obtained in the 1.5 fm gap PCA with 2.7 fm
excitation spot diameter.
ratio seen in the spectra is again about 50 dB,
because of the increase of the noise foor. Though the
source of the noise is not clear at present, we may
reduce the noise level by frther optimization of the
device and the setup, by which we would achieve the
signal to noise ratio higher than 60 dB.
+. Conclusion
In the present work, we investigated the
detection of THz waved by L TO OaAs PCA with 1.5
fm excitation. By focusing tightly the excitation
pulses down to 2.7 fm and using the PCA of 1.5 fm
gap length, the signal intensity was enhanced by a
factor of 10 fom the value obtained in the
conventional 5 fm gap PCAs. We believe that such a
scheme can be simply implemented in various THz
time domain setup leading to the simplifcation of the
system.
5. REFERENCES
[1] M. Suzuki and M. Tonouchi, "Fe-implanted InGaAs
photoconductive terahertz detectors triggered by 1.56
1m femtosecond optical pulses", Appl. Phys. Lett. bb,
163504 (2005).
[2] ^. Chimot, J. Mngeney, P. Mounaix, M. Tondusson, K.
Blary, and J. F. Lampin, "Terahertz radiation and
detection by Br
+
-irradiated Ina 53G847As
photoconductive atenna excited at 800 nm wavelength",
Appl. Phys. Lett. bV, 083519 (2006).
[3] A. Takazato, M. Kamakura, T. Matsui, J. Kitagawa, and
`. Kadoya, "Detection of terahertz waves using low
temperature-grown InGaAs with 1.56 1m pulse
excitation", Appl. Phys. Lett. V,101119 (2007).
[4] M. Tai, K. Lee, and 7. =. Zhag, "Detection of
terahertz radiation with low-temperature-grown GaAs
based photoconductive antenna using 1.55 1m probe",
Appl. Phys. Lett. , 1396 (2000).
[5] M. Suzuki, et al. "Annealing temperature dependence of
terahertz wave detection by low-temperature-grown
Gas-based photoconductive antennas gated by 1560
nm optical pulses", IRMMW-THz 2006, Wed-P-18
(2007).