1119/2

BAHASA INGGERIS 2

EXAMINATION FORMAT

The SPM English 1119/2 paper consists of 4 sections: Section A consists of 15 multiple choice type questions which test reading and comprehension skills and sub-skills at recognition level. Questions 1 to 8 are based on short texts of different text types newspaper reports, dialogue, poster, extracts from articles and reports. Questions 9 to 15, which test grammar and vocabulary items, are based on a rational cloze passage with 7 blanks. Section B requires candidates to transfer relevant information accurately from one text type to another. For SPM 2010, the question required candidates to transfer relevant information from a poster to the table. Section C consists of comprehension questions which test candidates ability to demonstrate reading and comprehension skills and sub-skills at recognition level. Candidates then have to answer the questions, using language competently to convey the answers. For this years question, candidates were required to answer questions based on a passage on doing acts of kindness. This section also requires candidates to write a summary which tests their ability to select and retrieve relevant information, and then organise the information coherently. This question also tests candidates ability to paraphrase effectively and concisely. For this years question, candidates were required to summarise the ways in which people can show acts of kindness and the benefits that can be experienced from acts of kindness. Section D tests reading and comprehension skills and sub-skills at the production level. Candidates are required to answer questions set on the literary texts selected for the literature component. Candidates are also expected to give a personal response to the literary texts tested. They include the selected poem (question 32), short story (question 33) and novel (question 34). For SPM 2010, the poem tested was Theres Been a Death in the Opposite House, the extract was from the short story The Drovers Wife and the novel question required candidates to write on an important incident giving reasons why it was important. OVERALL PERFORMANCE On the whole, candidates did quite well in this paper. Candidates with good language proficiency did exceptionally well while candidates with poor language ability were unable to perform well. A very small percentage failed to respond to the tasks.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATES ACCORDING TO THEIR GROUPS Good candidates Candidates with good language proficiency were able to comprehend and respond to all the tasks relevantly and accurately. Most of them did well in Section A and Section B. They were able to respond well to the reading comprehension task and showed good ability to write the summary in their own words. They also managed to produce answers of a high standard with clear details for Section D (Literature Component). Average candidates Generally, students of average language ability fared quite well in Section A. A few of the items posed problems to them. Section B usually produced betterthan-average performance. There were a few questions left unanswered in Sections C and D. Some candidates who used their own words to answer the comprehension and summary questions inadvertently penalised themselves because their limited competency resulted in grammatical and spelling errors which sometimes caused distortion of meanings. Weak candidates Almost all the weak candidates attempted Sections A and B but most of them performed badly. Candidates displayed very poor reading skills. Lifting and overlifting in sections B and C were evident and the candidates did not show understanding of the task or text. Some candidates did not even attempt sections B, C and D. PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATES IN EACH SECTION SECTION A (Questions 115): MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS GENERAL PERFORMANCE On the whole, candidates were able to do quite well in Section A as they displayed a good understanding of the task. However, performance was better where questions required only recall and understanding of main ideas.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF CANDIDATES Question 1 A significant percentage of the candidates managed to draw the correct conclusion for the task based on the extract of the newspaper report. Candidates were able to associate food and clothing with basic items and then link it to the phrase distributed to the victims. Weak candidates merely matched words from the extract to one of the distractors while some of them misinterpreted the roles played by the two bodies: Suntyre Malaysia and The Flood Recovery Drive. Question 2 Candidates with good language ability were able to draw the correct conclusion (favoured) from the phrases not many concerts have been staged for classical music and but contemporary and pop concerts do not face the same situation. Weak candidates, who should have been more familiar with the words that sound the same in Bahasa Melayu, chose the wrong options. Question 3 A majority of the candidates chose the correct option as the process involved in the preparation for the marathon run is quite straightforward. Candidates were able to comprehend the sequence easily. Some candidates were probably misled by the appearance of the word rest at the end of the advice in the extract. They failed to see the catch in the word after. Question 4 This item required candidates to read for details and a large majority of the candidates chose the correct information based on the newspaper report. They were able to draw the right conclusion based on the phrase it had only one to show, thanks to..Rufina Tan. Weaker candidates did not understand the phrase was in the running for five gold medals and eventually chose the wrong option thinking Malaysia won five gold medals. Question 5 Only a small percentage of the candidates were able to infer the correct response from the phrase make it beneficial to a charity of your choice. Some candidates failed to read the text as a whole and merely focused on key words like donation and charity.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Question 6 Candidates were able to relate the first symptom to day 1. Candidates could have also related to their own personal experience in having a cold where a fever usually develops when you fall ill. Question 7 Candidates could infer the answer from the phrase send us a cheque as a form of donation as well as understand the meaning of contribution and link it to how it contributes to the conservation problem. Some candidates failed to differentiate the meaning of to expand and to set up. Weak candidates focused on similar words used in the options and the text for example homes and anti-poaching patrols. Question 8 The word breed is repeated three times thus providing the clue to the answer. Some candidates most likely related it to common advice given by adults and campaigns that Aedes can kill. They were also probably influenced by the fact that people are dying from dengue. Questions 9 - 15 The items were based on a cloze text. They were all grammar items which assessed the students knowledge of verb forms, prepositions, pronoun, gerund and logical connector. The passage was about a writers opinion of Malaysia. Question 9 We are _____ with natural beauty pristine beaches, refreshing greenery and an abundance of flora and fauna. The item tested candidates knowledge of past participle and the passive form. Candidates were able to relate to the clue given in the first sentence was brought up and educated. Weak candidates were misled by the auxiliary verb are which must be followed by the continuous form of the verb (are blessing). Question 10 Although they are of diverse races, they live _____ peace and harmony. Candidates were familiar with the common usage of the phrase living in peace and harmony. A significantly small percentage of the candidates had no idea on how to use correctly the prepositions in and on.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Question 11 In the towns and city, we _____ first-class facilities ranging from five star hotels. Candidates were able to link the description in paragraph 2 to that of paragraph 3 which uses the present tense. Weaker candidates were misled by the past tense form of the verb used in the first sentence of the text. Question 12 We lack _____ here and everything is at an affordable price. Candidates with good language proficiency were able to correlate the idea that when we have everything we lack nothing. Some candidates were unable to correlate the idea that when everything exists we actually lack nothing. Candidates may have been misled by the commonly used phrase lack something. Question 13 _____ homesick, I have to return home. Candidates were able to understand and use the gerund in context. Some candidates may have chosen the wrong option based on the verb form used in the preceding sentence. Question 14 As soon as I arrive at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport, I always sigh _____ relief. Good candidates understood the meaning of the word sigh and the correct preposition that goes with relief. Other candidates failed to identify the correct preposition as they did not understand the meaning of the word sigh. In addition, the expression sigh with relief is rarely used. Question 15 _____, a few have returned as they found that life there was not as easy as they had thought. Candidates were able to link the contrary ideas used in the two phrases, ..migrated a few years ago to look for greener pastures and returned as they found that life there was not easy... Weak candidates were unable to use linkers correctly.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDENTS AND TEACHERS 1. Students should read more to improve their command of the language 2. Students should go through past years questions and exercises in workbooks to familiarize with the examination format. 3. Teachers should give students more grammar exercises. 4. Give more rational cloze passages so that they can understand how to complete the blanks accurately. 5. Grammar should be taught in isolation SECTION B (Questions 16-25): INFORMATION TRANSFER The assessment objective for section B is to assess candidates ability to transfer relevant information from one text type to another. For the SPM 2010 paper, the task required candidates to read a poster on Taman Negara and using the information from the poster, candidates had to complete a table by writing short answers. Most of the candidates were able to locate the answers directly from the poster. However, question 17 was a little bit more challenging as quite a significant number of students misunderstood the meaning of the word inhabitants. Questions 21 and 25 were also imperfectly understood by some candidates. Candidates performed much better in this section compared to the other sections. Only a very small percentage of the students did not make any attempt to answer the questions in this section. STRENGTH Most of the candidates attempted this section. A majority of candidates could understand the instructions and were able to retrieve the relevant information from the poster. Candidates, who were proficient in the language, gave precise and concise answers. Even weaker candidates were able to provide correct answers. They were able to select and lift the portion of the sentences that had the answers. WEAKNESSES Candidates over-lifted the words, phrases or sentences. There was random selection of words or phrases among weak candidates. Spelling errors were prevalent. Candidates could not differentiate water-based activities from other activities. Candidates lacked the skill to transfer the information from the text to the table. They gave long answers and many of them over-lifted from the text. A small percentage of the students did not attempt this section.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

DETAILED PERFORMANCE Question 16 A majority of the candidates were able to answer this question correctly. Even some of the weak candidates could answer the question. Those who answered wrongly were probably candidates who did not quite understand the word Age. Common mistakes: Candidates answers were incomplete, for example

Candidates gave more than the required information, for example

Question 17 Quite a high percentage of the candidates were unable to answer this question correctly. Common mistakes: Candidates gave the wrong answers, for example

Bahasa Inggeris 2

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

There was inclusion of other unnecessary information.

Questions 18-20 Most candidates answered these questions correctly. Weaker candidates could not differentiate water-based activities from the other activities mentioned in the poster. Common mistakes: Incomplete information/ candidates own word

Inclusion of other information / over-lifting

Bahasa Inggeris 2

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Wrong answer

Question 21 For this question, candidates were required to identify the place for any one of the activities mentioned in questions 18-20. However, some candidates misunderstood the task and mentioned the activity that could be carried out at the place mentioned in the table. Common mistake: Wrong answer given by candidates

Questions 22-24 Candidates were required to identify three other activities besides the three water-based activities mentioned in questions 18-20. Most of the candidates were able to identify the activities but weaker candidates could not differentiate water-based activities from other activities. Common mistakes: Inclusion of other information / over-lifting

Bahasa Inggeris 2

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Wrong answer

Question 25 Like question 21, candidates were required to identify the place for any one of the activities mentioned in questions 22-24. Some of the candidates misunderstood the task and mentioned the activity that can be carried out at the place. Common mistake: Wrong answer

SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDENTS AND TEACHERS 1. Have more practice on information transfer of different types. 2. Teachers should discourage students from attempting mindless lifting as they could lose marks. 3. Students must be taught to provide short and precise answers when they attempt questions of this nature. 4. Teachers should teach students to use only information found in the text and not their own words. Sometimes, the use of own words may lead to distortion in meaning. 5. Students should go through past years questions and exercises in workbooks to familiarize themselves with all kinds of text types in this section.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

10

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

SECTION C GENERAL PERFORMANCE This section has two sub-sections: reading comprehension and summary writing. Students produced an above average performance in this section. Meanwhile, a small number of the candidates did not attempt both the comprehension and summary questions in this section. READING COMPREHENSION (Questions 26 30) This section tested the candidates ability to read and understand information contained in an extended text. The candidates were required to answer 5 comprehension questions based on a passage. Question 26 From paragraph 1, what is the name of the movie? Strength Candidates were able to answer the question what is the name, by giving answers such as

Candidates understood that the book and the movie shared the same title based on the phrase which was later made into the movie of the same name.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

11

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Weaknesses Many candidates wrote grammatically incorrect answers but the idea was comprehensible, for example

Spelling errors were quite prominent Candidates who could only recognise the word name gave the name of the book, the author or the character.

Over-lifting that included irrelevant information

Bahasa Inggeris 2

12

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Question 26 (b) How did Trevor try to change the world? Strength The majority of the candidates were able to give the right answer, for example

Even though lifting of whole sentences was allowed, most candidates were able to provide the exact answer showing that they understood the question. Candidates managed to lift relevant sentences, for example

Weaknesses Weak candidates lifted the wrong line since the words change the world appears in line 3 of the text

Bahasa Inggeris 2

13

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Some candidates did not understand the question. Instead of stating how Trevor changed the world, they focused on the reason or motivation behind his action.

Question 27 (a) From paragraph 2, what is the aim of the Random Acts of Kindness Foundation? Strength A majority of the candidates were able to lift the answer from the text Weaknesses Partial lifting that did not complete the idea required

Candidates lifted whole sentence that contained irrelevant information Question 27 (b) Which word from the paragraph means do the same to others? Strength A significant number of candidates were able to give the exact one-word answer reciprocate, showing that, apart from understanding the meaning of the word, they were also aware of the difference between word, phrase and sentence. A few wrote out the sentence, the word is reciprocate, and placed the word within inverted commas or had the word underlined

Bahasa Inggeris 2

14

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Weaknesses Giving more than one word as the answer

Candidates chose the wrong word

Question 28 (a) From paragraph 4, what effect can a comic strip have on a person reading it? Strength A majority of the candidates were able to respond accurately A significant number of candidates were able to lift the permissible sentence for one of the answers, e.g.

Some candidates just gave a one-word answer which was acceptable

Bahasa Inggeris 2

15

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Weaknesses Candidates failed to change the point of reference

Poor lift or over-lift the line concerned

Question 28 (b) Who does the word them in line 26 refer to? Strength Candidates were able to pick the correct answer that is patients. The word who in the question gives a clue that the answer must refer to a group of people.

A significant number of candidates were able to lift the correct phrase from an earlier sentence in the text.

Weaknesses Some candidates misunderstood them as a reference to more than one person, so they gave two groups of people.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

16

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Candidates mistakenly thought it referred to the items mentioned in the text.

Question 29 From paragraph 5, give two reasons why some people are not prepared to do acts of kindness? Strength Most candidates were able to give the correct answers. Candidates lifted the relevant sentences Weaknesses Some candidates misinterpreted takes up too much time and rephrased their answers wrongly

Some candidates gave the wrong answers, e.g.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

17

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Question 30 Without using examples from the passage, suggest two ways in which you can be kind to others. Strength Good candidates were able to give quality answers.

Average students were able to give simple acts of kindness

Weaknesses Candidates lifted the examples from the text

Vague answers

Bahasa Inggeris 2

18

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Mindless lift of phrases or sentences from text

SUGGESTIONS TO STUDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. Read the text and questions at least twice. Learn to look for clues and use contextual clues Understand the fundamental needs of the Wh-questions. Look for answers in the given paragraphs. Select intelligently phrases or sentences. 5. Students should be adept at using a wide range of vocabulary 6. Make it a habit to look up meanings of difficult words encountered when reading. A good dictionary is a must. 7. Do more comprehension exercises. 8. Understand key words in the questions 9. Attempt all the questions. 10. Give logical opinions. 11. Read extensively.
SUGGESTIONS TO TEACHERS

1. Expose students to the use of figurative language 2. Expose students to the key words such as word, phrase and sentence which are vital in answering some comprehension questions. 3. Expose students to various types of comprehension passages/reading materials other than those in text/revision books. 5. Encourage students to read extensively, including newspaper articles and magazines. 6. Remind students to change the pronouns accordingly when lifting answers.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

19

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

SUMMARY WRITING (QUESTION 31) The summary question tests the candidates ability to select and retrieve relevant information, use the information given to display an understanding of the task and to organise the information coherently. The question also tests candidates ability to paraphrase effectively and concisely and to present the information in Standard English, in an accurate and fluent form. For this years question, the candidates are required to write a summary of the ways in which people can show acts of kindness and the benefits that can be experienced from acts of kindness.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

20

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

GENERAL PERFORMANCE On the whole, candidates did not perform as well as last year. They were able to select and retrieve the required information from the text. Their response was also organised coherently. However, as expected, a substantial number of the candidates adopted the safe strategy to be text dependent in shaping their response. So, they did not take up the challenge of using own words in the response. In short, the language was largely text-based. When they attempted to use their own words, it was restricted to mostly single word substitution. GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATES ACCORDING TO THEIR GROUPS Candidates in the High Achievement Group The confidence and competency of the candidates were the main features of the response. These candidates are proficient in the language and therefore were able to respond relevantly to the task. They managed to retrieve most of the information required and were also able to paraphrase effectively and concisely. They also presented their responses accurately, showing an ability to use original compound and complex structures. Candidates in the Average Achievement Group Generally, candidates in this group displayed a good understanding of the task, even though there was heavy reliance on the text. They demonstrated this by retrieving the required information. There was some form of selective lifting and at times, wholesale copying, but they were still able to get good marks for content and language. There were attempts to reorganise and reshape the text. At times, attempts to rephrase distorted the original meaning of the information required. Candidates in the Low Achievement Group Candidates did not show understanding of the task. There were cases of candidates producing more or less a complete transcript of the text. There was also mindless lifting which led to fractured syntax. A small percentage of the candidates did not even attempt the question.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

21

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

DETAILED PERFORMANCE Strength Good candidates understood the requirements of the task and were able to select the relevant information to write a summary of the ways in which people can show acts of kindness and the benefits that can be experienced from them. Competent candidates were able to identify all or almost all the content points. There were sustained and noticeable attempts at paraphrasing. Expressions were generally sound, e.g. take time out to listen to someone who has a problem and needs a friend = one can lend their ears to a friend in need. A large percentage of the candidates were able to do intelligent and selective lifting of the relevant sections of the text. They were able to lift phrases and parts of a sentence and join them together to form a new sentence that makes sense. Candidates showed good use of connectors. The writing was clear, well-organised and coherent. Spelling and punctuation were accurate. Weaknesses Many candidates were unable to paraphrase due to their low proficiency. At times, when candidates tried to paraphrase, meaning was distorted. The expressions were not secure. Some of the candidates attempts to paraphrase were limited to single word substitution. The summary was also poorly organised and lacked coherence. Weak candidates failed to lift intelligently - dropping words indiscriminately leading to mindless lifting where sense did not come through. Some candidates showed total reliance on text language and resorted to lifting whole sentences. Weak candidates resorted to copying several sentences in sequence, dropping a sentence or two and then copying a few more wholesale copying. Very weak candidates resorted to copying sentence after sentence without a clear break, thus producing a more or less complete transcript of the text. Summary exceeded the word limit of 130 words. There was intrusion of irrelevant sentences or sections which were not from lines 13 43. Candidates included their own ideas and opinions. Candidates were unable to grammatically complete the first sentence using the ten introductory words One of the many ways to show kindness is to...giving money by donating to a needy cause.
Bahasa Inggeris 2

22

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

There was heavy frequency of serious errors or fractured syntax which impeded reading and understanding. Words were wrongly spelt although lifted from the passage. Candidates were not able to differentiate between givers and receivers of acts of kindness. They did not understand the meaning of benefits. Though the question was clear with the preposition "from" which meant the doer and not the giver, the candidates had obviously not paid attention to this preposition and straight away interpreted the question as benefits for the giver and the receiver. This was a mistake that was found in average and below average candidates. The overall performance clearly shows that candidates did not digest the question and think before they answered, they read once, got a superficial understanding and then summarised by merely shortening the sentences by dropping words and phrases.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

23

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Sample 1

Comments: Strength This candidate was able to select and retrieve the relevant information as required in the task that is the ways in which people can show acts of kindness and the benefits that can be experienced from acts of kindness. The candidate was able to rephrase effectively by condensing the material to make it concise and also forming original complex and compound sentence structures. The finished product was rather different from the original text, even though there were phrases from the text which were difficult to substitute. In rephrasing, the candidate was able to convey the meaning intended across using his or her own words. Together with the usage of sound expressions and almost faultless grammatically correct sentences, this candidate was able to perform well in this question.
Bahasa Inggeris 2

24

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Sample 2

Comments: Strength This candidate was able to select and retrieve the relevant information. Weakness There was an attempt at rephrasing but at the same time, there was considerable reliance on the comprehension text language. In terms of accuracy, the candidate made a few errors, mainly because he attempted to use his own words. But, the candidate showed a marked ability to use original compound and original complex sentences.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

25

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Sample 3

Comments: Strength This candidate had successfully done selective lifting which made sense - intelligent lifting. The candidate had relied completely on the text language and had not attempted rephrasing. Furthermore, the candidate did not show some ability to form original compound sentences.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

26

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Sample 4

Comments: Strength Candidate had lifted whole sentences from the text - wholesale copying. In doing so, the candidate had kept the response largely accurate. Weakness The candidate relied totally on the text language. There were not many errors because the candidate lifted entire sentences from the text.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

27

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Sample 5

Comments: Weakness The candidate had tried to carry out selective lifting but unfortunately most of the sentences formed did not answer the summary question. Furthermore, many of the sentences did not make sense a sign of mindless lifting. Even though the candidate relied completely on the text, there were frequent serious errors in the response. This was due to some fractured syntax as a result of the mindless lifting. However, some parts were accurately copied.

SUGGESTIONS TO STUDENTS 1. Always check to make sure each sentence written answers the task given. 2. Use only text within the stipulated area as stated in the rubric. Draw lines to indicate the beginning and the ending of the summary area. 3. Do not exceed the word limit given. 4. Use the 10 introductory words given. 5. Complete the opening sentence using the 10 introductory words without any grammatical errors so that the first content point is not lost. 6. Build a wider vocabulary, so that paraphrasing is more effective and concise. 7. Learn to write using a variety of sentence structures complex and compound. 8. Learn to use sequence and logical connectors. 9. Practise rephrasing. 10. Write a draft first and edit it before writing out the summary.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

28

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

SUGGESTIONS TO TEACHERS 1. Train the students to understand the task given. 2. Teach and train students to locate the points. Teach them how to differentiate between main and supporting ideas/details, and how to recognise the main clause so that they can select the main idea while leaving out the unnecessary details. 3. Teach them to select intelligently 4. Remind students to use the given 10 introductory words and to use material within the stipulated text area, and write in one paragraph. 5. Teach students to use suitable cohesive devices such as connectors. 6. Teach and train the students, especially those with good linguistic skills, to paraphrase effectively and concisely. 7. Teach and train students to write using a variety of sentence structures, focusing on ability to form original compound and complex structures. 8. Focus on one skill at a time locating content points, paraphrasing or writing original syntax. 9. Help the weaker students by using key words for locating points answering summary questions on how, benefits, reasons, steps etc. 10. Improve their vocabulary by introducing relevant comprehension texts based on the curriculum specifications. SECTION D (LITERATURE COMPONENT) GENERAL PERFORMANCE Candidates showed an average performance in this section. They managed to answer a few of the questions in the poem and short story sections. They performed reasonably better in the novel question. A significantly high percentage of the candidates did not attempt the questions in this section. POEM (QUESTION 32) GENERAL PERFROMANCE The poem chosen for SPM 2010 was Theres Been a Death in the Opposite House. Out of the three questions given, only one allowed candidates to lift the relevant line or phrases from the given stanza. Quite a high percentage of the candidates were able to answer this question. They needed knowledge of the poem to answer the second question and not many managed to get the correct answers. They were able to provide their personal response to question 33(c).

Bahasa Inggeris 2

29

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

STRENGTH AND WEAKNESSES OF CANDIDATES Strength Candidates were able to give short and accurate answers, e.g. Q 32(a) Numb look Q32(b) (i) To pay respect (ii) To confirm the death Candidates were able to lift the relevant line or phrases for Q32(a)

Candidates showed a good understanding of the required task, e.g. Q32(b) Why do you think the neighbours and doctor were in the house?

Bahasa Inggeris 2

30

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Students were able to express their opinion for the personal response question based on their personal experiences or observations.

Weak students managed to give acceptable responses in poor language.

Weakness Mindless lifting directly from the poem

Candidates showed no understanding or misunderstanding of task

Bahasa Inggeris 2

31

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Lack the language ability, e.g. use of BM words

DETAILED PERFORMANCE Question 32(a) From stanza 1, how did the persona I know that there was a death in the opposite house? Common mistakes: Two answers given but one answer was inaccurate

Candidates did not understand the question.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

32

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Question 32b: Why do you think the following people were in the house? (i) The neighbours (ii) The doctor Common Mistakes: Candidates lifted lines from the poem,e.g. (i) The neighbours rustle in and out (ii) The doctor drives away Candidates showed no understanding of task

Question 32c: Without using examples from the poem, suggest two things you would do to show concern if death occurred in your neighbours house? Common Mistakes: Candidates response that expressed the same idea

Bahasa Inggeris 2

33

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Candidates were unable to express ideas due to poor command of the language, use of BM words

SUGGESTIONS TO STUDENTS 1. Students must ensure a good understanding of the poem, both literal and figurative meanings 2. Do more exercise on all the poem 3. Give appropriate responses based on the stanzas tested except for questions that ask for personal opinion (open-ended questions) 4. Improve linguistic ability to enable accurate expression of ideas especially for questions that require personal opinions and responses.

SUGGESTIONS TO TEACHERS 1. Teachers must teach and emphasize the main elements of the poems 2. Expose students to the different type of questions usually tested 3. Train students to read and understand the questions carefully. Then, respond to them by making sure that the answer is relevant to what is being asked by the question. 4. Remind students to provide responses to the questions based on the prescribed stanza 5. Train students to provide personal responses, especially for questions which ask for personal opinions. Teachers must emphasize to the students that they are expected to use their own words and expressions 6. Lessons should be conducted in a more meaningful manner and related to students personal lives. SHORT STORY (QUESTION 33)

GENERAL PERFROMANCE The short story chosen for this year is The Drovers Wife. Out of the three questions given, most candidates partially lifted the relevant answer for the first question and lifted the entire relevant sentence for the next question. Quite a high percentage of the candidates were able to provide personal responses to question 33(d).
Bahasa Inggeris 2

34

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

STRENGTH AND WEAKNESSES OF CANDIDATES Strength They were able to provide answers that gave the main idea of dealing with the snake for Q33(a)

Candidates were able to lift the relevant words or phrase

Showed a good understanding of the required task, e.g. Q33(c) Would you live like the Drovers wife? Give a reason why you would like to and one reason why you would not.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

35

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Weak candidates managed to give acceptable responses in poor language

Weaknesses Mindless lifting directly from the extract

Candidates showed no understanding or misunderstanding of task

Bahasa Inggeris 2

36

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Candidates gave more than one answer

DETAILED PERFORMANCE Question 33(a) Why is the Drovers wife sitting alone by the fire? Common Mistakes: Candidate gave two answers but one answer was inaccurate

Candidates did not understand the question.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

37

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Question 33(b): State any two activities she does on Sunday afternoon. Common Mistakes: Candidates wrote more than one activity in the space given and showed no understanding of task, wrong answer

Question 33(c): Would you like to live like the Drovers wife? Give a reason why you would like and one reason why you would not. Common Mistakes: Candidates gave a reason why not for a positive reason and vice versa

Candidates were unable to express ideas due to poor command of the language

Bahasa Inggeris 2

38

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

SUGGESTIONS TO STUDENTS 1. Students must ensure a good understanding of the story in terms of characters, characterization, plot, themes, setting and moral values 2. Work on the reading and comprehension skills and the ability to ascertain the task given by the question pertaining to the who, what, when and why. 3. Give appropriate response based on the extract as required by the rubric except for questions that ask for personal opinion (open-ended questions) 4. Improve linguistic ability to enable accurate expression of ideas especially for questions that require personal opinions and responses. SUGGESTIONS TO TEACHERS 1. Teachers must teach and emphasize the main elements of a story i.e. characters, characterization, plot, themes, setting and moral values. 2. Expose students to the various comprehension questions. 3. Train students to read and understand the questions carefully. Then, respond to them by making sure that the answer is relevant to what is being asked by the question 4. Remind students to provide responses to the questions based on the prescribed extract 5. Train students to provide personal responses, especially for questions which ask for personal opinions. Teachers must emphasize to the students that they are expected to use their own words and expressions. THE NOVEL (QUESTION 34) GENERAL PERFORMANCE Candidates were asked to choose one of the novels they had studied and respond to the question. On the whole, they did not do well in this question. Candidates with good language proficiency were able to respond relevantly, giving details from the text besides expressing their viewpoints consistently. Some candidates wrote on more than one incident. Some responses were too shallow, lacking textual evidence and development. Weaker candidates just wrote something about the novel, usually narrating events in the novel without addressing the task.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

39

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

STRENGTH Candidates responses were consistently relevant and very convincing with a marked ability to provide well-developed textual evidence. There was evidence of critical thinking. The language used was accurate with sophisticated structures and a wide range of vocabulary. Responses were well-organised and the pieces of writing were cohesive. WEAKNESSES Responses were either not relevant or task were partially addressed e.g. discussing incident without giving reasons. Candidates wrote on more than one incident. Some of the candidates did not address the task at all. There were instances of mere narration of the novel read, characterization or values in novel The responses lacked textual evidence to support the viewpoint. Some responses lacked development. There were textual errors showing inaccurate and poor understanding of the novel read indicating there were candidates who had not read the novel at all. Weak candidates showed poor language ability high frequency of serious errors of various kinds with fractured syntax. There were serious tense errors. Responses were poorly organized and lacked logical connectors. Sometimes written in just one paragraph Some candidates reproduced learned or memorized responses DETAILED PERFORMANCE Question 34 Based on the novel that you have read, write about an important incident that you remember. Give reasons why you remember the incidents.

Bahasa Inggeris 2

40

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

An Example of a Good Answer

Bahasa Inggeris 2

41

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Bahasa Inggeris 2

42

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Bahasa Inggeris 2

43

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Strength 1. Response was relevant as candidate focused on an important incident and gave reasons why he or she remembered the incident 2. Convincing response to the task. 3. Always provided precise textual evidence to support viewpoint with close reference to text 4. Provided personal response to task 5. Good organization of thoughts and ideas. First paragraph set up the response well. Weakness 1. Language was not very accurate. Tense errors and some inappropriate words used (imprecise vocabulary).

Bahasa Inggeris 2

44

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

An Example of a Fairly Good Answer

Bahasa Inggeris 2

45

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Strength 1. Could comprehend the task. An incident was identified and opinion given. 2. Able to provide some textual evidence with little development 3. Tried very best to give an opinion even though lacked language competency Weaknesses 1. Poor organization and planning 2. Language errors were quite frequent but meaning was never in doubt

Bahasa Inggeris 2

46

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

An Example of a Weak Answer

Bahasa Inggeris 2

47

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

Strength 1. Able to discuss about an important incident Weaknesses 1. Little textual evidence, lacked development 2. Language errors with some blurring in meaning 3. Poorly organized An Example of a Very Weak Answer

Strength 1. Able to give some details on a character of the novel Weaknesses 1. Response had no relevance to the task. Narrating some of the events in the novel without any understanding of the requirement of the task 2. Language errors with some blurring in meaning

Bahasa Inggeris 2

48

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010

SUGGESTIONS TO STUDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Read the novel and understand it well. Textual evidence is always important when responding to a task. Read the rubric carefully and address the task relevantly. Know the details of the main or significant events in the story so as to produce accurate and sufficient textual support. Be familiar with the plot and characters in the story. Do not memorise themes, plot, characters etc without any understanding Learn to relate what has been learnt to the requirements of the task and give an appropriate response.

SUGGESTIONS TO TEACHERS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Ensure students read and comprehend the contents of the novel. Teach students all the elements of the novel: theme, plot, character etc. Do not encourage mere memorization. Teach and train students to respond relevantly to a task, or to give their opinions on the elements in the story. This can be done through debates. Teach students to respond with textual support. Remind and advise students to answer all the questions. Allow students to view the CD provided by the Curriculum Development Centre to help them visualize and understand the story Teachers should encourage students to read the text and not the synopsis Guide and teach the students on how to analyze the characters, events, themes

Bahasa Inggeris 2

49

Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM 2010