Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
1.1
1.2
KEY TERMS
Bias Clinical guidelines Evidence-based practice (EBP) Hypothesis Peer reviewed PICO question Variable
Cathy works on a medical oncology floor, a unit where patients undergo extensive chemotherapy and radiation for leukemia, lymphoma, and other serious forms of cancer. The age of patients ranges from young to very old adults. Because of their chemotherapy, many patients experience drops in their platelet counts and clotting factors, increasing their risk for bleeding. Cathy recently cared for a 42-yearClinical Nursing Skills & Techniques, 7th Edition Page 1 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
platelet counts and clotting factors, increasing their risk for bleeding. Cathy recently cared for a 42-yearold woman, who fell while trying to get to the bathroom and hit her head against the bed frame, resulting in a serious intracranial bleed. Cathy discusses the situation with two nurse colleagues and asks, How can we reduce the number of falls and injuries in our patients on the oncology unit? The nurse specialist for the unit tells Cathy, I heard about an approach to fall prevention on one of the surgical floors; it involves hourly rounding. Let's ask this question, Will the incidence of and injuries related to falls decline following use of hourly rounding compared with our current fall prevention protocol?' Feeling frustrated that their existing fall prevention protocol was not effective in reducing falls, the group agreed that the question was the right one to search in the literature. The nurse specialist conducted a literature search on the basis of the question and identified four articles pertaining to risk factors for falls and outcomes from hourly rounding. During their unit practice committee meeting, Cathy and her colleagues reviewed the articles carefully and chose three that offered good evidence for a way to implement hourly rounding and identify risk for and prevent falls. The staff noted that one of the articles recommended hourly rounding during daytime hours and rounding every 2 hours during evening and night hours. Another article summarized fall risks for patients in an acute care hospital and highlighted factors such as medications (e.g., antihistamines, sedatives, analgesics, and antiemetics), weakness, altered mental status, history of falls, and toileting needs to include in a nursing assessment. Based on their experience and a review of their unit fall index reports, the staff knew that patients on the oncology unit commonly experienced falls during all hours of the day. The unit practice committee recommended incorporating a new hourly rounds program along with focused nursing assessments for key fall risk factors. Registered nurses (RNs) would begin to round on patients on all even hours and conduct focused assessments of fall risk factors such as weakness, pain, or the need to go to the bathroom. Nurses would carefully monitor patients receiving antihistamines before blood transfusions. Nursing assistive personnel (NAP) would round on odd hours and do follow-up observations to be sure patients had toileting needs met, were comfortable, and had no further needs. Each hour the nursing staff would inform patients that someone from the nursing team would return in an hour for another check. The unit practice committee planned a staff orientation and set a date for the start of the hourly rounding protocol. Three months after implementing the rounding protocol, the medical oncology unit was cautiously optimistic. Their average fall index dropped from 5.1 to 3.7, and the injury rate also dropped. Another benefit was the decline in patients' use of call lights, which was attributed to patients knowing their nurses would visit frequently. All nursing staff on the unit were enthused by the change and agreed that hourly rounding needed to be a routine part of their unit culture. The staff was also able to see that the protocol improved patient outcomes and gave them more time to coordinate care because there were fewer distractions from patient calls. Six months after starting the new protocol, the fall index continued to remain low. An added outcome was a significant increase in patient satisfaction. Cathy submitted
Page 2 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
to remain low. An added outcome was a significant increase in patient satisfaction. Cathy submitted their protocol for an abstract in the hospital's Nursing Research Day. Cathy's abstract, Using Evidence to Prevent Falls was well accepted by her peers and became a standard for other nursing units in the hospital.
This clinical case study highlights the value in finding current and relevant information to make informed changes in the way you care for patients. The evidence from research studies and the opinions of oncology nurse experts provided a basis for Cathy and her colleagues to make evidence-based changes to their fall prevention protocol. The use of evidence in practice enables clinicians like Cathy to provide the highest quality of care to their patients and families. So, how does a nurse routinely use evidence in practice? It takes a new philosophy of thinking. Evidence-based practice (EBP) requires nurses to always think about their practice, raise good clinical questions, search for the evidence that pertains to their questions, apply relevant evidence in practice changes, and evaluate the outcomes.
1.3
2 3
Page 3 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
care is to simply apply a sterile transparent or gauze dressing to an intravenous site (Infusion Nurses Society [INS], 2006). The challenge is to obtain the very best, most current information at the right time, when you need it for patient care. The best evidence comes from well-designed, systematically conducted research studies, found in scientific journals. Unfortunately, much of that evidence does not reach the bedside. Many health care settings do not have a process to help staff adopt new evidence in practice. Nurses in practice settings, unlike educational settings, do not have easy access to databases for scientific literature. Instead, nurses often care for patients on the basis of tradition or convenience. Because there are obstacles to research-based practice in clinical settings, it is important for administrators to provide a supportive environment and adequate facilitation of change (Rycroft-Malone and others, 2004). There are sources of evidence that do not originate from research. This includes quality improvement and risk management data; infection control data, retrospective or concurrent chart reviews; and clinicians' expertise. Although nonresearch-based evidence is often very valuable, it is important that you learn to not rely on it alone. Research-based evidence is more likely to be timely and relevant. When you face a clinical problem, always seek the best source of evidence that helps you find the best solution in caring for patients. Even when you use the best evidence available, application and outcomes will differ based on your patients' values, preferences, concerns, and/or expectations (Oncology Nursing Society [ONS], 2005). As a nurse, you will develop critical thinking skills to determine whether evidence is relevant and appropriate to your patients and to a clinical situation. For example, a single research article suggests that therapeutic massage administered 60 minutes after an analgesic will enhance pain relief. However, if you care for a patient from a culture in which touch is a taboo, the use of massage is inappropriate. Using your clinical expertise and considering patients' cultures, values, and preferences ensure that you will apply the evidence available in practice both ethically and appropriately. Evidence-based practice requires good nursing judgment; it is not finding research evidence and blindly applying it.
1.4
Page 4 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
2 Collect the most-relevant and best evidence. 3 Critically appraise the evidence you gather.
4 Apply or integrate evidence along with your clinical expertise, patient preferences, and values in making a practice decision or change. 5 Evaluate the practice decision or change. 6 Communicate your results.
1.4.1
Page 5 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
controlled analgesia (C) more effective in reducing pain severity (O)? Is an adult patient's (P) blood pressure more accurate (O) while measuring with the patient's legs crossed (I) versus the patient's feet flat on the floor (C)? A well-designed PICO question does not have to include all four elements, nor does it have to follow the PICO sequence. However, the goal is to ask a question that contains as many of the PICO elements as possible in a logically framed question. Inappropriately formed questions (e.g., What is the best way to reduce pressure ulcers? What is the best way to measure blood pressure?) lead to many irrelevant articles in a literature search, making it difficult to find the best evidence. A clearly stated PICO question identifies knowledge gaps within a clinical situation. When you form well thought-out questions, the type of evidence you lack for clinical practice becomes more clear. Examples of different knowledge gaps include the following (ONS, 2005): Diagnosis: Questions about the selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests. Example: Does the use of a disposable oral thermometer compared with an electronic oral thermometer measure body temperature accurately in a patient with an endotracheal tube? Prognosis: Questions about a patient's likely clinical outcome. Example: Is there a difference in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in surgical patients wearing sequential compression stockings compared to those who perform range-of-motion (ROM) exercises? Therapy: Questions about the selection of the most beneficial treatments. Example: What bowel regimen is most effective in relieving constipation caused by the administration of opioid therapy in patients with chronic pain? Prevention: Questions about screening and prevention methods to reduce the risk of disease. Example: Does performance of a prostate specific antigen (PSA) test in an older adult who is asymptomatic of prostate disease decrease his risk for mortality from prostate cancer? Education: Questions about best teaching strategies for colleagues, patients, or family members. Example: Is the use of visual aids compared with low-literacy teaching booklets more effective to educate low-literacy adults about therapeutic diets? Meaning: Questions that seek understanding of a phenomenon. Example: How do patients with cervical cancer perceive their quality of life?
3 4
Page 6 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
1.4.1.1
Remember, do not be satisfied with clinical routines. Always question and use critical thinking to consider better ways to provide patient care.
1.4.2
Page 7 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
vague. The word you select sometimes has one meaning to one author and a very different meaning to another. A medical librarian helps you learn how to choose alternative words or terms that identify your PICO question and to obtain relevant evidence. In Fig. 1-1 we demonstrate the difference in the results of literature searches on two different questions. Question A is more general and not in a PICO format. Question B is a focused question using a PICO format. Note the difference in the number of articles in the last step of the search. Which group of articles would you prefer to review?
1.4.2.1
MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PubMed are among the most comprehensive databases and represent the scientific knowledge base of health care (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2005). Among the many databases, some are available through vendors at a cost, some are free of charge, and some offer both options. Nursing students and nurses who work in academic medical centers usually have access to an institutional subscription through a vendor. One of the more common vendors is OVID,
Clinical Nursing Skills & Techniques, 7th Edition Page 8 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
access to an institutional subscription through a vendor. One of the more common vendors is OVID, which offers several different databases. There are also databases available free on the Internet, such as PubMed and the Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews is a valuable source of synthesized evidence (i.e., preappraised evidence). The Cochrane database includes the full text of regularly updated systematic reviews and protocols for reviews currently happening. The National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC) is a database supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). It contains clinical guidelines, systematically developed statements about a plan of care for a specific set of clinical circumstances involving a specific patient population. The NGC is a valuable source when you want to develop a plan of care for a patient.
4 5
FIG. 1-1 Results of two literature searches on Mosby's Nursing Index. A, A search for the question What type of pain control reduces pain in patients who have had abdominal surgery? B, A search for the PICO question Does the use of epidural analgesia reduce pain severity compared with patientcontrolled analgesia in patients who have had abdominal surgery?
Page 9 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
The pyramid in Fig. 1-2 represents a hierarchy of available evidence. At this point in your nursing career, you are probably not an expert on all aspects of the types of studies conducted. But you can learn enough about the types of studies to help you know which ones have the best scientific evidence. Table 1-1, p. 7, describes types of studies in the evidence hierarchy, beginning with the study at the top of the hierarchy, a systematic review. If your PICO question leads you to a systematic review, celebrate! A systematic review is the perfect answer to a PICO question. Basically a researcher has asked the same PICO question you have asked and then examined all of the well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that ask the same question. A systematic review explains if the evidence that you are searching for exists and whether there is good cause to change practice. In the Cochrane Library, all entries include information on systematic reviews. Individual RCTs are the gold standard for research (Titler and others, 2001). An RCT establishes cause and effect and is excellent for testing therapies. Historically there have been few RCTs conducted in nursing. The nature of nursing causes researchers to ask questions that are not always answered best by an RCT. Nurses care for patients' responses to disease or health problems. For example, we assist patients with problems such as knowledge deficits, symptom management, and coping with psychological distress. An RCT cannot easily be designed to learn how patients experience health problems. Often descriptive studies or qualitative approaches are more helpful. What is most important is to have the research question match the appropriate research method. The use of clinical experts is at the bottom of the evidence pyramid, but do not consider clinical experts a poor source of evidence. Expert clinicians frequently use evidence as they build their own practice, and they are rich sources of information for clinical problems.
Page 10 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
practice, and they are rich sources of information for clinical problems.
5 6
Modified from Guyatt G, Rennie D: User's guides to the medical literature. American Medical Association: AMA Press, 2002. Harris RP, and others: Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process. Am J Prev Med 20:21-35, 2001.
Page 11 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
1.4.3
Page 12 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
and the appropriate nursing therapies. Clinical articles often describe how to use a therapy or new technology. A research article describes the conduct of a research study, including its purpose, how the study was designed, and the results. A research article's narrative contains several standard subsections: Purpose statement: Explains the focus or intent of a study. It identifies what concepts will be researched. This includes research questions or hypotheses, predictions made about the relationship or difference between study variables (a concept, characteristic, or trait that varies within subjects).
Methods or design: Explains how a research study is organized and conducted in order to answer the research question or to test the hypothesis. This is where you learn the type of study (e.g., RCT, case control, or qualitative study). You also learn how many subjects or persons are in a study. In health care studies, subjects sometimes include patients, family members, or health care staff. The language in the methods section is sometimes confusing if it explains details about how the researcher designs the study to minimize bias so as to obtain the most accurate results possible. Use your faculty member as a resource to help interpret this section. Results or conclusions: Clinical and research articles have a summary section. In a clinical article, the author explains the clinical implications for the topic presented. In a research article, the author details the results of the study and explains whether a hypothesis is correct or how a research question is answered. A qualitative study presents a thorough summary of the descriptive themes and ideas that arise from the researcher's analysis of data. A quantitative study includes a statistical analysis. It is important to become familiar with common statistical terms, especially in clinical trials, to know if a tested intervention had a significant effect or if the effect size was large enough to adopt in practice. When reading the statistical analysis, ask these questions: Does the researcher describe the results? Were the results significant? What was the size of the effect of the intervention? What was the sample size? A good author will discuss any limitations to a study in the results section. The information on limitations helps you to decide if you want to use the evidence with your patients. Clinical implications: A research article includes a section that explains if the findings from the study have clinical implications. The researcher explains how to apply findings in a practice setting for the type of subjects studied. After you critique each article for your PICO question, synthesize or combine the findings from all of the articles to determine the state of the evidence. Use critical thinking to consider the scientific rigor or accurateness of the evidence and how well it answers your area of interest. Scientific rigor is
Clinical Nursing Skills & Techniques, 7th Edition
6 7
Page 13 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
rigor or accurateness of the evidence and how well it answers your area of interest. Scientific rigor is the extent to which a study's findings are valid, reliable, and relevant to your patient population of interest. Consider the evidence in light of your patients' concerns and preferences. Your review of articles offers a snapshot conclusion based on combined evidence about one focused topical area. As a clinician, judge whether to use the evidence for a particular patient or group of patients who usually have complex medical histories and patterns of responses (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2005). Ethically it is important to consider evidence that will benefit patients and do no harm. Decide if the evidence is relevant, easily applicable in your setting of practice, and has the potential for improving patient outcomes.
Page 14 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
Descriptive study
Qualitative study
Quality improvement
Page 15 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
Data collected within a health care agency offers important trending information about clinical conditions and problems. Staff in the agency review the data periodically to identify problem areas and to then seek solutions. Accessing clinical experts on a nursing unit is an excellent way to learn about current evidence. Clinical experts often write clinical articles on topics that require application of evidence in the literature.
Article reviews use of quality improvement (QI) process in a nursing home setting where staff adopted best practices for pressure ulcer care for residents (Berlowitz and Frantz, 2007).
Clinical experts
Clinical article describes an evidencebased practice project, in which a team of nurses applied evidence from the literature to change their hospital's approach to intravenous (IV) site care and IV catheter stabilization (Winfield and others, 2007).
1.4.4
7 8
Page 16 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
your organization.
As a nursing student integrating evidence, your focus will begin with searching for and applying the best evidence to improve the care you directly provide your patients. The evidence available within nursing gives you an almost unlimited access to innovative and effective nursing interventions. Using an evidence-based practice approach will improve your skills and knowledge as a nurse and improve your patients' outcomes.
1.4.5
1.4.6
1.5
Page 17 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
practice. Patient safety and medical errors, the economics of health care, and variability in how disease conditions are treated are just some of the factors that have led government and private groups to support evidence-based practice. The use of evidence-based practice has the potential to improve the quality of care nurses provide, patient outcomes, and clinicians' satisfaction with their practice. This chapter provides a brief introduction to evidence-based practice. Of all of the initiatives introduced in health care, evidence-based practice may be the most important. With the rapid, ongoing expansion of research knowledge in health care, it is essential to remain accountable by applying evidence in patient care. When evidence exists on ways to improve patient outcomes, it becomes important for that evidence to reach the bedside. Your patients expect nursing professionals to be informed and to use the safest and most appropriate interventions. Use of evidence enhances nursing, improving patients' perceptions of excellent nursing care.
1.6
Maria Gonzalez is a 45-year-old Hispanic woman who is admitted to the hospital with ulcerative colitis, which she has had for 2 years. The disease is an inflammation and ulceration of the colon. As a result, Maria has a recurrence of bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and a fever. During her hospital stay Maria received intravenous fluids, corticosteroids, and antiinfective drugs. Jeanne is the nurse assigned to coordinate Maria's discharge home. Jeanne is concerned about Maria's diet at home and wonders how it might affect her disease, particularly the frequency of diarrhea. Jeanne learns that Maria eats a diet with sources of high carbohydrates. In consultation with the dietitian Jeanne asks if a lowcarbohydrate diet might be best for Maria. The dietitian suggests they do a literature search to see what the most current evidence suggests. 1 Given this clinical case study, write the PICO question that is the basis of Jeanne's inquiry. 2 The librarian helps Jeanne conduct a literature search. Among the articles located in the search is a systematic review. Explain why a systematic review is the best source of evidence. 3 One of the articles found by the librarian describes a study in which a researcher studied 45 patients with ulcerative colitis and 52 patients with normal intestinal function to determine if there is an association between frequency of diarrhea and ingestion of high protein intake. What type of study did this researcher conduct?
Clinical Nursing Skills & Techniques, 7th Edition Page 18 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
4 If Jeanne decides to educate Maria about changing her diet, what should she consider before applying the evidence that would be unique to Maria?
1.7
REVIEW QUESTIONS
1 Which statement best explains the goal of evidence-based practice? 1 Changes made in patient care are from suggestions in the literature. 2 It is based solely on current trends seen on the nursing unit. 3 It answers clinical questions by using appropriate, researched resources. 4 It makes changes in patient care after conferring with the patients' health care providers. 2 There are many steps of evidence-based practice. Select all that apply. 1 Ask a clinical question. 2 Obtain permission from the health care providers. 3 Communicate the findings. 4 Collect the most-relevant evidence. 5 Publish results of the project immediately. 6 Make certain the changes fit within the patients' culture. 3 A question focusing on the best solution to use to clean infected incisions would be what type of trigger? 1 Problem-focused 2 Knowledge-focused 3 Peer-focused 4 PICO-focused
Clinical Nursing Skills & Techniques, 7th Edition Page 19 of 21
8 9
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
4 PICO-focused
4 Which question contains the primary components of a PICO question? 1 Are oral steroids or inhaled steroidal medications better for female adults with adult-onset asthma? 2 What steroid preparations are best for male teenagers with activity-induced asthma who play sports? 3 How can school-age asthmatic children be best controlled using steroidal preparations? 4 Do pulse oximetry readings or peak flows provide better monitoring of the effectiveness of inhaled steroids in asthmatic children between the ages of 7 and 9? 5 Which activity would require the most critical thinking? 1 Determining whether data are relevant for the situation 2 Counting the number of related articles to support the new interventions 3 Assessing patients to determine if they meet the study criteria 4 Designing the table that will be used to report the data
1.8
REFERENCES
DR Berlowitz, RN Frantz: Implementing best practices in pressure ulcer care, the role of continuous quality improvement. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 8(suppl 3), 2007, S37. LC Callister, et al.: Inquiry in baccalaureate nursing education: fostering evidence-based practice. J Nurs Educ. 44(2), 2005, 59. G Guyatt, D Rennie: In User's guides to the medical literature. 2002, AMA Press, (online). RP Harris, et al.: Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 20, 2001, 21. Infusion Nurses Society: Infusion nursing standards of practice. J Intraven Nurs. 29(suppl 1), 2006, S1. BM Melnyk, E Fineout-Overholt: In Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: a guide to best practice. 2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
Page 20 of 21
PRINTED BY: Joslyn Gross <jgross1026@ufl.edu>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
R Newhouse, et al.: Evidence-based practice: a practical approach to implementation. J Nurs Adm. 35(1), 2005, 35. Oncology Nursing Society: Evidence based practice resource areahttp:// www.onsopcontent.ons.org/toolkits/evidence/Definitions/index.shtml, accessed November 2005. DL Sackett, et al.: In Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2000, Churchill Livingstone, London.
1.9
RESEARCH REFERENCES
YC Chen, et al.: The effect of intermittent nasogastric feeding on preventing aspiration pneumonia in ventilated critically ill patients. J Nurs Res. 14(3), 2006, 167. S Kendall: Witnessing tragedy: nurses' perceptions of caring for patients with cancer. Int J Nurs Pract. 13(2), 2007, 111. LS Pearson, JL Hutton: A controlled trial to compare the ability of foam swabs and toothbrushes to remove dental plaque. J Adv Nurs. 39(5), 2002, 480. J Rycroft-Malone, et al.: An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice. J Clin Nurs. 13, 2004, 313. SM Saw, et al.: Risk factors for contact lens related fusarium keratitis: a case control study in Singapore. Arch Ophthalmol. 125(5), 2007, 611. MG Titler, et al.: The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 13(4), 2001, 497. RE Watkins, et al.: Perceptions of infection control practices among health professionals. Contemp Nurse. 22(1), 2006, 109. T Werawatganon, S Charuluxanum: Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery. The Cochrane Database Rev. 2005, 1. C Winfield, et al.: Evidence: the first word in safe I.V. practice. Am Nurse Today. 2(5), 2007, 31.
Page 21 of 21