Site Suitability Report C32XZ: Deptford Church Street

Autumn 2011
Site suitability report C32XZ

Deptford Church Street
Please note: Further details are provided in the Final Report on Site Selection Process (doc ref: 7.05) that can be found on the Thames Tideway Tunnel section of the Planning Inspectorates web site.
110-RG-PNC-C32XZ-000608 | Autumn 2011

Deptford Church Street
Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street
Thames Tunnel Site suitability report C32XZ

List of contents
Page number
Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 Purpose and structure of the report ......................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................. 1 Consultation............................................................................................. 2 Site and surroundings .............................................................................. 2 Type of site .............................................................................................. 3
Site information ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 2.2
3 4
Proposed use of site construction phase ................................................... 4 Proposed use of site operational phase ..................................................... 5 4.1 4.2 Introduction .............................................................................................. 5 Restoration and after-use ........................................................................ 5 Access ..................................................................................................... 5 Construction works considerations .......................................................... 6 Permanent works considerations............................................................. 6 Health and safety..................................................................................... 6 Introduction .............................................................................................. 7 Planning applications and permissions.................................................... 7 Planning context ...................................................................................... 7 Planning comments ................................................................................. 8 Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 Transport ................................................................................................. 9 Archaeology........................................................................................... 10 Built heritage and townscape................................................................. 10 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water ............................. 10 Ecology .................................................................................................. 11 Flood risk ............................................................................................... 11 Air quality ............................................................................................... 11
Engineering assessment ................................................................................. 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
Planning assessment ...................................................................................... 7 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4
Environmental appraisal ................................................................................. 9 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8
7.9 7.10 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6
Noise ..................................................................................................... 11 Land quality ........................................................................................... 11 Introduction ............................................................................................ 12 Socio-economic profile .......................................................................... 12 Issues and impacts ................................................................................ 13 Introduction ............................................................................................ 13 Crown land and special land comments ................................................ 13 Land to be acquired ............................................................................... 14 Property valuation comments ................................................................ 14 Disturbance compensation comments................................................... 15 Discretionary purchase costs comments ............................................... 15 Offsite statutory compensation comments ............................................. 15 Site acquisition cost assessment ........................................................... 15 Introduction ............................................................................................ 15 Engineering ........................................................................................... 15 Planning................................................................................................. 15 Environment .......................................................................................... 16 Socio-economic and community ............................................................ 16 Property ................................................................................................. 17
Socio-economic and community assessment............................................. 12
Property assessment ..................................................................................... 13
Site conclusions by discipline ...................................................................... 15
Appendices ............................................................................................................. 19 Appendix 1 Sources of information Appendix 2 Site location plan Appendix 3 Planning and environment plans Appendix 4 Photographs of the site and surroundings Appendix 5 Transport plan Appendix 6 Services and geology plan Appendix 7 Construction phase layout Appendix 8 Operational phase layout Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables
ii
List of tables
Page number
Table 3.1 Construction phase data ............................................................................ 4 Table 4.1 Operational phase data ............................................................................. 5
List of abbreviations AOD BAP BT CPO CSO DLR EA GLA HGV LNR LPA LU m MOL ONS ORN PLA POS PTAL SAM SINC SNCI SSR SSSI SUDS TfL TD above Ordnance Datum biodiversity action plan British Telecom compulsory purchase order combined sewer overflow Docklands Light Railway Environment Agency Greater London Authority heavy goods vehicle local nature reserve local planning authority London Underground metre/metres Metropolitan Open Land Office of National Statistics Olympic Route Network Port of London Authority public open space public transport accessibility level scheduled ancient monument site of importance for nature conservation site(s) of nature conservation importance site suitability report site(s) of special scientific interest sustainable urban drainage systems Transport for London tunnel datum
iii
TLRN TPA UDP UXO
Transport for London Road Network Thames Policy Area unitary development plan unexploded ordnance
iv
1 1.1
1.1.1
Introduction Purpose and structure of the report

The Site selection methodology paper (May 2009 and revised August 2011) a outlines the process to be used to create the preferred list of main tunnel sites, and this process also applies to CSO sites. Paragraph 2.3.31 lists the type of general considerations that will be addressed in each site suitability report. Whether a consideration is relevant to the assessment of a site will depend on available information and professional judgement. This report was prepared through the assessment of information from the perspective of a number of technical disciplines: engineering, planning, environment, property and community. The reports have been prepared on the basis of the information listed in Appendix 1 and this level of information is considered to be appropriate to this stage of assessment. The Site selection background technical paper provides information on the requirements for different types of sites, their sizes and typical activities/ facilities within the sites. Each site suitability report considers a particular site on its own merits. In addition, an Engineering options report was produced, which relates to main tunnel and connection tunnel options. Information from both of these reports will feed into the technical assessment of how well the site may fit in with tunnel design options, ensuring combinations of sites spread across the length of the tunnel route provide a reasonable spatial distribution of sites (that will best assist with the construction of the tunnel, operation and maintenance). The outcomes are reported in the Phase two scheme development report.
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.2
1.2.1
Background
The process for selecting sites is set out in the Site selection methodology paper. All sites have previously passed through the following parts of Stage 1: Part 1A Creation of the long list of potential main tunnel (and CSO) sites Part 1B Creation of a short list of potential main tunnel (and CSO) sites o o o Table 2.2: Long list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites an assessment against set considerations and values Table 2.3: Draft short list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites assessment against a list of more detailed considerations Workshops to consider each site to arrive at a short list of sites.
The amendments made in August 2011 do not change the site selection methodology process. The amendments only related to the introduction of a second phase of consultation (paragraphs 2.3.13-2.4.15) and minor factual updates.
Page 1
Site suitability report C32XZ 1.2.2 The final part of Stage 1 includes this report. The following is an overall summary of all elements that apply to all the sites on the final short list: Part 1C Creation of the preferred list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites site data, site visits, site suitability reports, engineering options report and optioneering workshops that are reported in the Phase two scheme development report.
1.2.3
The Site selection methodology paper also contains a provision for a back-check process in paragraph 2.5.6 that states: If any sites for any of the main tunnel sites or intermediate sites (or CSO site) are eliminated for any reason, if there are significant changes of circumstances in relation to existing sites or combinations of sites, if new or replacement sites are required or found or if the engineering design develops in unexpected ways then a targeted repeat of stages 1-3 will need to be undertaken in order to fill in any site gaps.
1.3
1.3.1
Consultation
Thames Waters approach to engagement and consultation for the Thames Tunnel project is outlined in the Statement of Community Consultation and the accompanying Community Consultation Strategy. Thames Water has engaged regularly with all potentially affected London local authorities, other stakeholders and interested parties on sites and the project. Phase one consultation has been completed for all the preferred and shortlisted sites along with the three main tunnel route options. The analysis of the consultation responses is set out in the Report on phase one consultation and Interim engagement report. Any relevant site comments were considered at the post phase one consultation optioneering workshops. The outcomes of these workshops are reported in the Phase two scheme development report. After the workshops, engagement on sites has continued with key stakeholders, and the engineering design for sites has also continued in parallel. In autumn 2011, phase two consultation will provide another opportunity for people to comment on sites.
1.3.2
2 2.1
2.1.1
Site information Site and surroundings

This site is one of the back-check shortlisted sites for the Deptford Storm Relief CSO. This section provides an overview of all the site information that will be used by one or more disciplines to assess the site in sections 3 to 9 of this report. Site C32XZ is located approximately 1km south of the River Thames and 300m west of Deptford Creek within the London Borough of Lewisham. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 2. The site is bounded by Deptford High Street (A2209) to the east, Coffey Street to the north, and Crossfield Street to the south. To the north of Coffey Street lies St Pauls Church and Churchyard. The closest
2.1.2
2.1.3
Page 2
Site suitability report C32XZ residential properties lie approximately 50m to the east of the site, on Bronze Street, and a school, St Josephs RC Primary School, is located some 55m to the southwest of the site. The elevated North Kent Railway Line passes in an eastwest direction around 40m to the south of the proposed site. 2.1.4 The proposed site is located within the St Pauls Conservation Area. There are a number of listed buildings and structures in the vicinity, including the Grade I St Pauls Church. The proposed site falls within a number of other designated areas within the London Borough of Lewisham Unitary Development Plan and Core Strategy, including an area of archaeological priority, a nature conservation site of local importance, and public open space. All the mapped designations, where data was available, are shown on the planning and environment plans in Appendix 3. Photographs of the site and surroundings, together with an aerial photograph of the site, are attached as Appendix 4. There is no point of vehicular access to the site at present, but access would be possible from Coffey Street and Crossfield Street off Deptford High Street, which in turn provides direct links to the TLRN A2 to the south (0.5km), and the A200 (0.2km) to the north. The nearest railway station is Deptford Rail (0.2km), with the nearest Docklands Light Railway station being Deptford Bridge (0.5km) to the south, and the nearest London Underground station being New Cross, some 0.8km to the southwest of the proposed site. A number of preliminary transport plans for the site are attached as Appendix 5. Third-party assets and significant utilities are listed below and are shown on the services and geology plan in Appendix 6: St Pauls Church (Grade I listed) borders the site to the north. The walls of the former graveyard to the Old Baptist Chapter and southeast angle of St Pauls Church, and the walls and railings to the north and east of the Churchyard are Grade II listed structures. The elevated North Kent Railway Line (Grade II listed) to the south.
2.1.5
2.1.6 2.1.7
2.1.8
2.1.9
The locations of other third-party assets, such as BT and fibre optic communications cables, are to be confirmed by further studies and utility searches and may not be shown on the services and geology plan. Information on the geology specific to this site can be found within the services and geology plan which is in Appendix 6. The plan shows that the shaft would be founded in the Chalk.
2.1.10
2.2
2.2.1
Type of site
The site C32XZ is being considered as: a CSO site to intercept the Deptford Storm Relief CSO (CS32X).
Page 3
3
3.1.1
Proposed use of site construction phase

The proposed construction phase layouts for the CSO site are located in Appendix 7 Construction phase layout, and are based on a preliminary assessment. The construction phase layout drawings are illustrative and show: the layout as a CSO site potential access point.
3.1.2
3.1.3
Photographs of typical activities associated with the CSO construction phase are provided in Appendix 7. Potential above-ground construction features include: approximately 3m high hoarding around the site boundary welfare facilities, temporary structures, approximately 3m high grout plant, approximately 3m to 5m high, including silos mobile crane, approximately 30m high (maximum and not for full construction duration).
3.1.4
To enable construction of the CSO interception chamber and connection culvert at this site, phased two-lane closures of Deptford Church Street would be required. As the road is a dual carriageway, single lane traffic in each direction would be maintained by removing part of the central reservation. Pedestrians would be diverted to the opposite footway. Since the existing sewer is located on the western side of Deptford Church Street, the phased lane closures would not have to move across the full width of the road. The preliminary assessment of the traffic management which would be required is indicated on the temporary traffic management plan in Appendix 5. Preliminary data associated with the construction phase are provided in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 Construction phase data Activity Length of construction period Likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) Working days Primary means of transporting excavated material away from site Primary means of transporting materials to site CSO site 2 - 4 years 12 hrs from 7am to 7pm Mon to Sat Road Road
3.1.5
Page 4
4 4.1
4.1.1
Proposed use of site operational phase Introduction

The indicative operational phase layout for the CSO site is located in Appendix 8 Operational phase layout, and is based on a preliminary assessment. The generic elevations of structures shown on the operational phase layout are located in Appendix 8 and provide an illustration of typical examples of the permanent structures which are applicable to CSO sites. The underground infrastructure at this site would likely comprise an interception chamber, double flap valve chamber and a drop shaft with access openings. The above-ground infrastructure would likely comprise a ventilation column and electrical kiosk. The top structure to the shaft is envisaged to be finished to a minimum level of 104.5m tunnel datum (TD) (4.5mAOD) and since the mean ground level of this site would 106mTD (6mAOD), the top structures would be flush with ground level. The top structure is to provide access and egress into the drop shaft. A hardstanding would be provided to the top structures. The site would not be fenced. Preliminary data associated with the operational phase are provided in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 Operational phase data Level of inspections and maintenance and likely working hours, ie, (night/day/ weekend) frequency of visits No. of traffic movements One daytime visit every six months for electrical/instrument inspection. An additional one-week maintenance period for tunnel/shaft inspection required per ten years that could be night/day/weekend working. One van visit every six months. An additional one-week period of two to ten movements per day (estimated several vans and two cranes) every ten years.
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4 4.1.5
4.1.6 4.1.7
4.2
4.2.1
Restoration and after-use

The portion of the site not occupied by the permanent works would be restored to its original condition on completion of the construction works.
5 5.1
5.1.1
Engineering assessment Access

This section should be read in conjunction with Section 7.2.
Page 5
Road
5.1.2 During the construction phase, one-way flow of vehicles would be through the construction site, with access from Coffey Street and Crossfield Street. Both of these streets are off the A2209 (Deptford Church St). Operational site access would be from Coffey Street or Crossfield Street. The A2209 is 500m from the TLRN (A2). There is a 4.8m height restriction on the A2209 between the site and the A2.
5.1.3
Rail
5.1.4 A rail facility would be located approximately 1km from the site. The route to the rail link would be constrained with a 3.7m height restriction on Edward St, which is traffic calmed. However, rail access is not considered to be a significant factor for CSO sites. Deptford Railway Station would be 300m from the site and could provide access for construction personnel.
5.1.5
River
5.1.6 The site would be inland, with no direct access to the river, although river access and jetty/wharfage facilities are not a requirement for CSO sites.
5.2
5.2.1
Construction works considerations

The site would be within a grassed area bounded by Coffey Street, Crossfield Street and Deptford Church Street. No demolition of buildings would be required but an old wall would need to be removed. The interception chamber would be located on top of the existing sewer, which runs under the carriageway of Deptford Church St on the western side of the central reservation. Construction of this interception chamber and the connection culvert would require partial closure of Deptford Church St, but one-lane working in each direction would be maintained. Data available on third-party assets and significant utilities shows that the main items of concern are the church to the north of the site and the railway arches to the south of the site. Construction methods would be adopted, as appropriate, to mitigate potential settlement of these assets. It is likely that the proposed works can be constructed within the overall construction programme.
5.2.2
5.2.3
5.2.4
5.3
5.3.1
Permanent works considerations

The top structures to the drop shaft and flap valve chambers would be flush with existing ground level.
5.4
5.4.1
Health and safety

There are no unusual health and safety issues associated with this site.
Page 6
6 6.1
6.1.1
Planning assessment Introduction

The planning assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Planning applications and permissions Planning context Planning comments.
6.2
6.2.1
Planning applications and permissions

An initial desktop search of the London Borough Lewisham online planning applications database did not identify any planning applications submitted within the last five years applicable to the site. However, a planning application granted in 2009 was found for the demolition of the hall and the construction of a new building at St Josephs RC Primary School, to the southwest of the site. A number of historic applications were found relating to St Pauls Church, on the opposite side of Coffey Street from the site.
6.3
6.3.1
Planning context
The following is a summary of the relevant local planning policies and designations affecting the site and are taken from the current statutory development plan for the borough. The development plan comprises the saved policies from the Lewisham Unitary Development Plan, adopted July 2004, the Lewisham Core Strategy, adopted June 2011 and the London Plan 2011. The proposed site is located within the St Pauls Conservation Area and there are four listed buildings and structures in the vicinity of the proposed site. St Pauls Church is a Grade I listed building. The walls of the former graveyard to the Old Baptist Chapter and southeast angle of St Pauls Church, and the walls and railings to the north and east of the Churchyard are Grade II listed structures. The elevated North Kent Railway Line to the south is Grade II listed. The proposed site lies wholly within an area of archaeological priority. Core Strategy Policy 16 states the council will ensure that the value and significance of the borough's heritage assets, which include conservation areas, listed buildings and locally listed buildings and structures, archaeological remains, and historic parks and gardens, will continue to be monitored and conserved. Core Strategy Policy 15 requires that development conserves and enhances the boroughs heritage assets and the significance of their settings. Conservation areas will be protected from inappropriate built development St Pauls Church, to the north of the proposed site, is identified in the UDP as an important local landmark. Development which obscures existing views of local landmarks will be resisted. Core Strategy Policy 17 states that local views, landmarks and panoramas identified on the Proposals
6.3.2
6.3.3
Page 7
Site suitability report C32XZ Map will be managed to ensure that new development does not impede or detract from local views or obscure local landmarks. 6.3.4 Core Strategy Spatial Policy 1, Core Strategy Policy 12 and Unitary Development Plan Policy OS7, Other Open Space the site lies within St Pauls Churchyard and Crossfield Open Space, which is designated as a site of nature conservation importance (site of local importance). Core Strategy Spatial Policy 1 states that open space, including Metropolitan Open Land and sites of importance for nature conservation, will be protected, and a net gain of open space across the borough will be sought, particularly through onsite provision. These provisions are amplified in Core Strategy Policy 12, which also seeks to improve accessibility to open space, protect trees and preserve and enhance local biodiversity and geological conservation interests. Unitary Development Plan Policy OS7 states the council will resist the loss of both POS or UGS and any development that would adversely affect its amenity, open character or appearance though inappropriate scale. The council may make an exception to this where development is ancillary to open space, where it facilitates access to open space and where provision can be made nearby for replacement open space of equal or better quality and size. The site lies within an area identified in the Unitary Development Plan as deficient in open space. While Policy OS8 on this matter has not been saved, it is likely that the area will still be considered deficient in open space by the council and this will be reflected and reinforced in future policies. It is also therefore likely that the council will resist the loss of, and seek enhancements to, open space within such areas. The closest dwellings to the site are to the east, off Bronze Way, and to the northeast, off Berthon Street. There is also a primary school to the south of the site, off Crossfield Street. Policy HSG 4, Residential amenity, states that the council will seek to improve and safeguard the character and amenities of residential areas throughout the borough, to protect existing community facilities and open spaces and to ban lorries.
6.3.5
6.3.6
6.3.7
6.3.8
6.4
6.4.1
Planning comments
A number of planning designations are applicable to the site and adjoining areas. These designations and the policies relating to them have been identified and described in Section 6.3. Of these, those relating to heritage, open space and nature conservation are of most relevance to the proposed development. The site falls within a designated archaeological priority zone and the St. Pauls Conservation Area. St Pauls Church itself is a Grade I listed building and there are two other listed structures in the churchyard, all within 100m of the proposed site. St Pauls Church is also identified in the UDP as an important local landmark. These heritage constraints are therefore significant. The council will resist development within a conservation area which has a negative impact on the character or appearance of that area. The council requires that development
6.4.2
Page 8
Site suitability report C32XZ conserves and enhances the boroughs heritage assets and the significance of their settings. Further appraisal of the archaeological potential on the site is provided in Section 7 of this report. 6.4.3 The site is designated as open space and lies within an area of public open space deficiency, and would therefore conflict with the aims of Core Strategy Spatial Policy 1, Core Strategy Policy 12 and Unitary Development Plan Policy OS7. There is potential to reduce the loss of open space during construction through amending the site boundary, however there are still likely to be negative impacts on amenity value of the remaining open space. The local planning authority (LPA) may require the reprovision of open space of equal or better quality and size within the surrounding area to avoid the loss of public open space in an area of deficiency. The temporary use for construction would also be a mitigating factor, depending on the reinstatement and amount and type of any permanent development on the site. The site is also designated as a nature conservation site of local importance and, as such, in line with Core Strategy Spatial Policy 1 and Policy 12, the LPA will require development proposals to be accompanied by an environmental appraisal, including methods of mitigation and proposals for compensation. The LPA may impose planning conditions to protect and enhance nature conservation on site or may require new habitat provision nearby. The site is approximately 56m from the front facade of the nearest residential properties in Congars House on Bronze Street. Some mitigation may be required to protect residential amenity in line with development plan policy. Construction working hours are also likely to require control, in accordance with working hours normally operated in residential areas.
6.4.4
6.4.5
7 7.1
7.1.1
Environmental appraisal Introduction

The following sections summarise specialist assessments which are provided in Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables.
7.2
7.2.1
Transport
In highway terms, the site is considered to be less suitable as a CSO site, as it will require the removal of a large amount of on-street parking bays and traffic calming to enable access to the site. Traffic management will be required on Deptford Church Street to construct the interception chamber (also see Appendix 5 Transport plan). The route to the TLRN (A2) is possible via Creek Road, and then Norman Road and Greenwich High Road, but constrained. The route from the TLRN to the site features a height restriction. The route to the nearest rail link contains additional restrictions in the form of on-street parking, speed cushions, and bridges with height and width restrictions. However, rail transport is unlikely to be feasible due to the small quantities of excavated material produced by a CSO site. The site is
7.2.2
Page 9
Site suitability report C32XZ remote from the river, although river access is not essential for a CSO site. Some parking could be provided on site for the workforce, with limited additional parking available on surrounding roads. There is reasonable potential for the workforce to use public transport to access the site.
7.3
7.3.1
Archaeology
This site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site from an archaeological perspective. Although it is possible that the site has the potential for archaeological remains associated with St Pauls Church to the north of the site, including burials associated with the church, this cannot be confirmed on the basis of the evidence available at this stage. If present, remains may include post-medieval burials which may have originally extended southwards into the site. Should desk-based research show burials to be present, they may be considered a constraint on development. However, the remediation of post-medieval human remains is regularly undertaken to facilitate development and may be acceptable, subject to a sufficiently detailed desk assessment and agreement of a written scheme of work. A burial licence would also probably be required. However, the work is likely to be costly and require a substantial period of time to undertake. There is also the possibility that earlier remains dating to the medieval period may be present as the general area was quite intensively occupied during this time. Further work is required to ascertain the extent of the St Pauls graveyard in the vicinity of the site.
7.3.2
7.4
7.4.1
Built heritage and townscape

In terms of built heritage and townscape, the site is considered less suitable as a CSO site. There is the potential for direct impacts on an open space within St Pauls Conservation Area. In addition to this, the proposals are likely to have an indirect impact on two listed buildings and one conservation area. Mitigation may be possible in the form of a high-quality scheme design and/or screening. There is also potential for adverse impacts on views from surrounding areas, including residential properties, and on the character of the amenity space. The site would also potentially indirectly impact the character of adjoining amenity open space. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality scheme design, screening and landscape treatment of the site, would partly reduce the adverse impacts on the local townscape character.
7.4.2
7.5
7.5.1
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water

In terms of hydrogeology, this site is considered to be less suitable as a CSO site because the drop shaft is to be constructed in Chalk (principal aquifer, previously called major aquifer) and the site lies within the source protection zone (SPZ 3) of one EA licensed abstraction from the Chalk. Dewatering of the Chalk, Thanet Sand and superficial deposits will be required. The Chalk piezometric head is likely to be approximately 44m above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design.
Page 10
Site suitability report C32XZ 7.5.2 In terms of surface water resources, this site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site because there is no direct pathway to the nearby surface water receptors for pollution.
7.6
7.6.1
Ecology
In ecology terms, the site is considered less suitable as a CSO site due to the potential temporary and permanent loss of a site of nature conservation importance (SNCI). The permanent loss of part of the SNCI is likely to require compensatory provision within the local area. Basic ecological surveys would be required.
7.7
7.7.1
Flood risk
In flood risk terms, the site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site. The site is defended from flooding from the Thames Tideway and Deptford Creek, and there is likely to be space for surface SUDS, while infiltration SUDS may be suitable, given the underlying geology of the site. However, controls on quality of runoff will be applied, owing to the presence of a total catchment source protection zone underlying the site.
7.8
7.8.1
Air quality
In terms of air quality, this site is considered to be less suitable for use as a CSO site. There are residential properties in close proximity to the site, therefore there is potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at these properties. These impacts can be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas of already poor air quality. This can be somewhat mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
7.9
7.9.1
Noise
From a noise perspective, this site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site, due to the distance between the site and residential properties located on Deptford High Street and at Congers House on Bronze Street. The number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and the proposed access route has the potential to result in an adverse noise impact due to the close proximity of residential receptors and the Sir Josephs Catholic Primary School to the proposed haulage routes.
7.10
7.10.1
Land quality
The site is considered suitable as a CSO site with respect to land quality, as previous uses appear to have been limited to residential housing and soft landscaping, and the distance and nature of potentially contaminating activities in the vicinity of the site are unlikely to have resulted in significant contamination of the site.
Page 11
8 8.1
8.1.1
Socio-economic and community assessment Introduction

The socio-economic and community assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Socio-economic profile Socio-economic and community issues and impacts.
8.2
8.2.1
Socio-economic profile
The site is located near the borders of the London boroughs of Greenwich and Lewisham. Within Lewisham, it falls along the boundary of Evelyn and New Cross wards, but wholly within Evelyn ward. Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census data show the following indicators for Evelyn Ward, in comparison to the rest of Lewisham, London and England as a whole: Evelyn ward has 6,000 dwellings with 14,512 inhabitants. The average age of the population is 30.7 years. The ward has a relatively high proportion of economically inactive people who look after their homes, are permanently sick or disabled or have other reasons for economic inactivity. It also has a high rate of unemployed people at 8.1%, as compared to 5.6% for the borough, 4.4% for London and 3.5% for England. Correspondingly, the percentage of people with no qualifications is a few percentage points higher than Lewisham, London and England at 29%, while the proportion of people with Level 4 or higher qualifications is relatively low by the same comparators. Local authority housing tenant households in the ward form 58% of the population, which is more than double the proportion of such households in the borough, and more than three times the London figure. Housing association homes also form a relatively high proportion. A majority of the population consider themselves to be Christian. The Muslim population of the ward, at 7%, is relatively higher than Lewisham and England averages, but is comparable to the London average.
8.2.2
These statistics show that the ward has a relatively high concentration of vulnerable people in terms of health and disability, as well as socio-economic status. A more mixed ethnic profile than the rest of the borough indicates the existence of pockets of black and minority ethic (BAME) households in the ward. Low skill levels and high unemployment figures may mean that construction jobs would be more welcome to residents of this area than others.
Page 12
8.3
8.3.1
Issues and impacts

Use of the site will result in the temporary loss of an area of public open space in this residential area. Construction works in this location appears likely to cause some disruption to St Pauls Church and St Josephs Catholic Primary School, which are both in close proximity to the site. The nearest residential properties are located to the east of the site on Bronze Street, but the majority do not overlook the site. The need to close a section of Deptford Church Street to intercept the sewer appears likely to affect traffic flow in the area, which could impact on local residents. Given the residential nature of the area, community safety issues, especially for children and vulnerable adults, may arise in relation to the construction site itself and the associated construction traffic on residential scale streets. There appear to be no negative impacts from the operational phase from a community impacts perspective, and there is potential for the site to be improved and to provide a more usable space for the local community.
8.3.2
8.3.3
8.3.4
9 9.1
9.1.1 9.1.2
Property assessment Introduction

This report builds on the advantages and disadvantages in Table 2.3 and the assessment provides more up-to-date information. The site is open space and was originally owned by the London Borough of Lewisham and the Greater London Council. Referencing advice indicates that when the Greater London Council was dissolved, its land was transferred to the London Borough of Lewisham.
9.2
9.2.1
Crown land and special land comments

The land is open space and may be classified as special land under S.131 of the Planning Act 2008. If this is the case, and if an acquisition cannot be agreed with the owner, a special parliamentary procedure may be needed after the order is confirmed. As the whole order would be subject to the special parliamentary procedure, not just the acquisition of this site, the project could be delayed by a minimum period of several months in the best case. In the worst case, the order might be rejected by Parliament, which could delay the project for a much longer period and even result in the order failing, although this is considered unlikely. The S.131 special parliamentary procedure may not be required if exchange land is provided. Therefore, the provision of exchange land should be included in the order, although it is likely to be difficult to identify an appropriate replacement. Alternatively, where temporary works powers only are required, this would not amount to land acquisition and the issue would not arise. Contact should be made with the owner as soon as possible to establish if an acquisition can be agreed.
9.2.2
9.2.3
Page 13
9.3
9.3.1
Land to be acquired
The compensation assessment for the site assumes that the worksite and access to it will be acquired temporarily via the acquisition of new rights for the period of the works stated in the engineering section above. The worksite includes an existing brick wall to be acquired for the period of the works. A smaller area within the worksite would need to be acquired permanently for operational purposes. This area is located in the northeast part of the site. A small area outside of the temporary working area will need to be acquired permanently to accommodate the permanent hardstanding. The works phase and operational phase will require the acquisition of subsoil for the connection culvert. Rights of way or easements to enable access from Coffey Street will also need to be acquired.
9.3.2
9.3.3 9.3.4 9.3.5
9.4
9.4.1 9.4.2
Property valuation comments

The planning history confirms that there are no development proposals for this site. Compensation for the acquisition of new rights is normally based on the diminution in value to the land caused by the acquisition. Compensation for the permanent acquisition of land is normally based on market value. However, compensation for the permanent acquisition of unusual types of property, where there is no general market, can be assessed on the basis of the cost of equivalent reinstatement at a new site, but there must be a genuine intention to reinstate. If compensation is assessed on a diminution in value basis for the new rights (temporary occupation during works, access rights during works, access rights for operational purposes) and on a market value basis for the permanent acquisition, the costs are likely to be relatively low and therefore acceptable. If compensation is assessed on an equivalent reinstatement basis, the acquisition costs would be significantly higher, but still acceptable. Although finding replacement land may be difficult, compensation has been assessed on a temporary equivalent reinstatement basis in order to be prudent and to take account of the possible need to provide replacement land. The temporary worksite land will be reinstated, following the construction phase, as a part of the engineering works. Therefore, reinstatement costs are not included in the compensation assessment. The cost of reinstating the existing brick wall has been included in the estimate.
9.4.3
9.4.4 9.4.5
9.4.6
9.4.7
Page 14
9.5
9.5.1
Disturbance compensation comments

The site is open space, which does not appear to be used exclusively by any party. Therefore, the disturbance costs are likely to be low.
9.6
9.6.1
Discretionary purchase costs comments

Works on the site will be limited to 12-hour working, Monday to Saturday. Therefore, it is unlikely that there will be any significant discretionary purchase costs.
9.7
9.7.1
Offsite statutory compensation comments

There should be limited potential for offsite statutory compensation under S.10 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965, as there is unlikely to be any physical interference with public or private property rights. There should also be limited potential for claims under the Land Compensation Act 1973 Part 1, as the completed works are unlikely to cause a diminution in value to property.
9.7.2
9.8
9.8.1 9.8.2
Site acquisition cost assessment

The statutory acquisition costs are likely to be acceptable for both options. We assess the site to be suitable and preferred, and would encourage dialogue with the owner at an early stage to establish if it would be prepared to agree to the acquisition and on what terms.
10 10.1
10.1.1
Site conclusions by discipline Introduction

The conclusions presented in this section are drawn from each disciplines assessment, and are designed to inform the workshop where a final conclusion on whether the site moves forward as one of the preferred sites or not.
10.2
10.2.1
Engineering
This site is suitable as a CSO site. The site would be close to the existing storm relief sewer and would have access to Deptford Church Street.
10.3
10.3.1 10.3.2
Planning
On balance, the site is considered less suitable as a CSO site. There are a number of sensitive planning designations and policy constraints relating to this site. The site is within a conservation area, in proximity to a number of listed buildings and a local landmark. It is within designated open space and a nature conservation site of local importance. Construction activities and permanent after-use structures would need to be sensitively designed and mitigated so as to avoid significant policy conflicts.
Page 15
10.4
10.4.1 10.4.2 10.4.3 10.4.4
Environment
Overall, the site is considered to be less suitable as a CSO site. The site is considered suitable from the perspectives of archaeology, flood risk, surface water resources, noise and land quality. The site is considered less suitable from the perspective of transport, built heritage, townscape, hydrogeology, ecology and air quality. Overall, the site is considered less suitable and further investigation will be required as to whether transport, archaeology, built heritage, townscape, hydrogeology, ecology and air quality impacts could all be adequately mitigated. Likely mitigation considerations would include: Transport further investigation into the likely feasibility and acceptability of removing a large amount of on-street parking bays and traffic calming to enable access to the site, as well as traffic management on Deptford Church Street to construct the interception chamber and the potential to overcome constraints identified on the route from/to the TLRN. Archaeology further studies would be required to determine whether a disused burial ground associated with St Pauls Church may have once extended southwards into the site. If confirmed, the likely presence of burial grounds within the site would require detailed desk assessment and agreement of a written scheme of work, and would be likely to require a burial licence. Built heritage and townscape further investigation to determine the acceptability of impacts on an open space within St Pauls Conservation Area and on the setting of heritage receptors in the vicinity, as well as impact on trees in the conservation area. The site would require a high-quality scheme design, screening, and landscape treatment to minimise adverse impacts on the local townscape character. Hydrogeology mitigation may be required as construction of the drop shaft will take place within the source protection zone (SPZ 3) of one EA licensed abstraction and dewatering may affect water users. Ecology further investigation to determine the acceptability of impacts to a site of nature conservation interest. The permanent loss of part of the SNCI is likely to require compensatory habitat provision within the local area. Air quality measures to ensure dust at the closest receptors is adequately mitigated.
10.5
10.5.1 10.5.2
Socio-economic and community

The use of the site is less suitable from a community impacts perspective. Use of the site will result in the temporary loss of an area of open space which may have a value to the local community. It also appears likely that
Page 16
Site suitability report C32XZ there will be some noise and visual disruption to St Pauls Church and St Josephs Catholic Primary School, although the potential to impact on the surrounding residential properties appears limited. 10.5.3 After the construction work is complete, there is the potential for the site to be improved and to provide a more usable space for the local community.
10.6
10.6.1
Property
The advantages of the site are as follows: Site acquisition costs are likely to be acceptable if assessed on a diminution in value basis or on the basis of providing temporary replacement land. Special parliamentary procedure risk can be mitigated by ongoing negotiations with the owner to establish on what terms an acquisition may be acceptable If acquisition cannot be agreed and replacement land cannot be provided, the order may need to pass through a special parliamentary procedure.
10.6.2
The disadvantages of the site are as follows:
10.6.3
Overall, the site is considered suitable as a CSO site.
Page 17
Page 18
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendices
Appendices
Page 19
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendices
Page 20
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 1
Appendix 1 Sources of information Engineering

Traffic Management and Access Roads/Rail URS Scott Wilson Access River BMT Isis Services (Utilities) and Third Party Assets Thames Tunnel and utility companies Geology British Geological Society and Thames Tunnel Construction and Operational Layout Template Thames Tunnel Site selection background technical paper Thames Tunnel
Planning
London Borough of Lewisham online planning applications database Lewisham Core Strategy, adopted June 2011 Saved policies in the Lewisham Unitary Development Plan, adopted July 2004. The London Plan, adopted July 2011 Saved policies within the Greenwich Unitary Development Plan, adopted in 2006
Environment
Transport Map of Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) www.tfl.gov.uk Bus Route Maps: North-east, north-west, south-west, south-east www.tfl.gov.uk Crossrail Plans www.crossrail.co.uk/crossrail-bill-documents PTAL scores Obtained from Table 2.3 information Thames Path map www.walklondon.org.uk Capital Ring www.walklondon.org.uk Cycle Routes www.sustrans.org.uk and Local Cycling Guides 1-14 Design Manual for Roads and Bridge TD 42/95, Highways Agency
Archaeology Historic Environment data from Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service (GLAAS) National Monuments Record for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens
Appendix 1 Page 1
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 1 London Archaeological Archive and Research Centre (LAARC) Local authority websites Bing maps
Built heritage and townscape Local authority lists of Locally Listed Buildings National Monuments Record for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens Unitary development plan and DPDs Local authority websites Bing maps
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Local authority details of unlicensed abstractors Environment Agency abstraction licence details Environment Agency groundwater levels and contour maps (2009-11) Environment Agency water quality (surface water and groundwater) Environment Agency Groundwater Source Protection Zones Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck British Geological Survey (BGS) logs BGS 1:50,000 Geological Sheets Solid and Drift Editions (England and Wales) BGS Geology of London Special Memoir for 1:50,000 Geological sheets 256 (North London), 257 (Romford), 270 (South London) and 271 (Dartford) (England and Wales) Crossrail (2005) Assessment of Water Impacts Technical Report: Appendix C Baseline Data. Figure C.4: Extent of Saline Intrusion based on 177 mg/l *5mmol/l) Isochlor
Ecology Thames Estuary Partnership (2002) Tidal Thames Habitat Action Plan London Biodiversity Action Plan www.lbp.org.uk Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) www.magic.gov.uk - statutory designated sites London Wildweb wildweb.london.gov.uk - non-statutory site of importance for nature conservation Black redstart distribution in London www.blackredstarts.org.uk/ pages/.html
Appendix 1 Page 2
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 1 National Biodiversity Network http://searchnbn.net - distribution of protected species Google Maps aerial views of habitat features BAP habitats www.natureonthemap.org.uk Priority habitats and species on national and local scales www.ukbap.org.uk
Flood risk Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Environment Agency National Flood and Coastal Defence Database Envirocheck
Air quality Local authority websites London Air Quality Network www.londonair.org.uk Defra UK-AIR, air quality information resource www.airquality.co.uk Defra Air Quality Management Areas http://aqma.defra.gov.uk Defra Local Air Quality Management http://laqm.defra.gov.uk
Noise Envirocheck Identification of receptors Promap Calculation of distances between site and receptors Multimap Aerial photography www.multimap.co.uk Defra noise maps Identification of existing noise levels
Land quality Google Maps/Earth Site walkover information Envirocheck Data Sheets provided as a GIS Database British Geological Survey (BGS) logs
Socio-economic and community

Statistics from the Office of National Statistics 2001 Census data
Property
Multimap Valuation Office Agency (VOA) website Land Registry information provided by Mouchel
Appendix 1 Page 3
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 1 London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham online planning applications database Multimap
Appendix 1 Page 4
Appendix 2 Site location plan
Appendix 2 Page 1
TI AL
EN
FI D
! (
CS32X Deptford Storm Relief
TOWER HAMLETS
&
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
GREENWICH
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Site CSO (Directly Controlled) Pumping Station
# *
! (
0 25 50 100 Metres 150 200
LEWISHAM
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345
C32XZ
CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-01991 Date : .................................. 2011/10/26 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
* #
Greenwich Pumping Station
Thames Water Utilities
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the proposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme.
APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN C32XZ SITE
Appendix 3 Planning and environment plans
Appendix 3 Page 1
STR CLYDE
! !
EET
TI AL
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
EN
FI D
IN GRIN L
!
CE G PLA !
EVE LY
! !
NS T RE M ! ET
REET
!
RD EDWA
! !
! ET S T RE
N ST MERTO !LA !
M ! # * M * # M ! * # M * #
M M ! M M M M M M ! M M M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M !
M M ! # # * * # * M M * # # * # * ! *M # # *M * # *M # # *M * #
M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M
!
M * # M * # M * # M * #
M ! # * M * # M ! * # M * #
M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M
!
M M ! # # * * M M * # # * ! *M # # *M M M * # # *
M M M M
M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M !
M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M !
M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M M M ! M M M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M !
M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M M M ! M M M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M
M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M
CREEKSIDE
M M ! M M M ! * # M * # * # M ! * # M * # M ! * # M * # * # M ! * # M M
M M ! M M M M
M M ! M M M M
M ! M M
&
AF
HC BEEC
M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M M M M
!
D ! * # # *! R * # * * # # * * #! # * OA# REEK C M M M M M M
T REE M M M Y ST ! UR ! ALB
M M GREENWICH M M M M
HYDE
!
T STREE
! ! ! !
! MAR
S DING UIL M M M ! ! Y A NN B
M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M
* # * # M * # M * # M * # M * # * # M * # M
# # * * # * # * # * # * * # *M # # *M * M # * # # * M M ! ! ! * # # * # * # * # * # * M M M M M * # # * # * # * # * # * TM M M ! # ! * # *M # *M *R # * # *! EE # ST S M M M M M * # # * R * # * # * # * A # PE P O# * # *M # *M * M # * # # * M M C ! ! ! * # # * # * # * # * # * M M M M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M ! M M ! M M ! M M ! M M ! M M ! M M ! M M ! M M ! M M ! M M ! M
# * * # * # Area of Main Map * # * # * # * Legend # Local Authority Boundary * #

Short Listed CSO Site
LOSE
CHUR DEPTFORD
EET STR ON M M M M M H ! ! ERT B
CH STREET
FFIN
! !
T ! T RE E CH S
GH ST DEPTFORD HI
!
ET FFEY STRE M CO M M M M
TREET ZE S ON M BM M M M M R ! ! !
CR
LEWISHAM
! !
IDONIA STREET
RESOLU
ION M M T M WAYM
C32XZ OS M M M M M ! S ! ! FIE L M M D M M M ST RE ET M M M M M ! ! !
M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M
15
30
60 Metres
90
120
REET
M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M ! M M M M !
ROCHDALE WAY
!
OCTAVIUS STREET
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02052 Date : .................................. 2011/08/19 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
Legend
! !
Protected/Strategic Views S WAY DOUGLA ! ! ! Protected/Strategic Views Development Sites
GIFFIN STREET
Proposals Sites ! # * * # # * ! ! * # # * * # Regeneration Areas
FRANKHAM STREET
M M ! M M M M !
! !
COMET PLACE
! M ! Mixed Use Areas !
* M # * # # * *M # # *M * M # * # # * M M M ! ! ! ! * # # * # * # * # * # * # * # * M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Defined Employment Area * # # * # * # * # * # * # * # * Major District Centre STREET HALES M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! # ! ! * M # * # # * *M # *M * M # * # # * This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M *of construction # * # # * # * sites * for # * the # * # # * permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist proposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme. * M # * # # * *M # # *M * M # * # # * M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * # # * # * # * # * # * # * # *
! ! ! ! ! !
Areas of Opportunity
ST WATSON'S
# * *Title: # APPENDIX 3A * # PLANNING & * # ENVIRONMENT PLAN * # C32XZ SITE * # * #
REET
TI AL
STR CLYDE
EET
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
FI D
ACE ING PL GRIN L
EN
EVE LY
NS T RE
REE RD S T EDWA
###### # # # ST #R # # T EE TON ER LAM # # #### ######

T STREE
ET
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
# # # #
# # # #
# # # #
# # # #
# # # #
# # # #
# # # #
# # # #
# # # #
# # # #
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
# # # #
# # # #
REET
CREE
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
#### #### #### # ## AD# K RO
# # # #
# # # #
# # # #
# # # #
&
AF
HC BEEC
T ALBURY S
HYDE
NN MARY A
BUILDIN
GS
FFINC H
T STREE
REET COFFEY ST
############ ############ # # # # #GREENWICH ####### ############ ############ ############ ############ ############ ############ ############ ############ ############ T# # # # # ##### #EE # N STR HO ERT #B# # # ######## ############ ############ ############
T STREE
LOSE
E PP CO
TR SS RA
T EE
Area of Main Map
Legend
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Site
CHUR DEPTFORD
CH STREET
GH ST DEPTFORD HI REET
RESOLU
E BRONZ
C32XZ LEWISHAM
15
30
60 Metres
90
120
IDONIA STREET
TION W AY
Legend
ROCHDALE WAY
OCTAVIUS STREET
Green Corridor/Chains
! !
! !
! !
Sites of Metropolitan Nature Conservation Importance Sites of Borough Nature Conservation Importance Y DOUGLAS WA Local Nature Reserve Open Space
ST WATSON'S
GIFFIN STREET
# # #Contaminated Sites
! ! ! ! ! !

CREEKSIDE
FRANKHAM STREET
Local Open Space Deficiency Green Space
######### District Park Deficiency ######### ######### Flood Risk Zone 3 ######### Flood Risk Zone 2 HALES STREET ######### This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party written # without # # the # express ### ## permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the # # # # # # # ## proposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme. #########
COMET PLACE
REET
# Paddington, London W2 1AF # Title: # APPENDIX 3B # PLANNING & # ENVIRONMENT PLAN # C32XZ SITE # #
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road,
STR CLYDE
EET
IN GRIN L
TI AL
EN
CE G PLA
EVE LY
NS T RE
REET
!
ET
CREE K RO AD
FI D
&
AF
HC BEEC
RD S T EDWA
REET
ST LAMERTON
LOSE
HYDE
T STREE
! !!! ! !! ! REET !!! A LBURY ST !

CHUR DEPTFORD
GREENWICH
E PP CO TR SS RA T EE
Area of Main Map
Legend
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Site
NN MARY A
BUILDIN
GS
! ! !
REET COFFEY ST
O BERTH
N STR
EET
CH STREET
FFIN
T T RE E CH S
LEWISHAM
IDONIA STREET
OCTAVIUS STREET
GH ST DEPTFORD HI REET
E BRONZ
T STREE
CR
OS SF IE
C32XZ
LD ST RE ET
15
30
60 Metres
90
120
RESOLU
TION W AY
ROCHDALE WAY
Y DOUGLAS WA
GIFFIN STREET
Listed Building (point) Archaeological Areas Conservation Areas Landmarks
CREEKSIDE
Legend
Listed Building (polygon)

FRANKHAM STREET
COMET PLACE
ST WATSON'S
HALES STREET
APPENDIX 3C PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT ! HERITAGE PLAN C32XZ SITE
Title:
REET
Appendix 4 Photographs of the site and surroundings
Appendix 4 Page 1
TI AL
EN
FI D
! (
TOWER HAMLETS
&
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
GREENWICH
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Site CSO (Directly Controlled) Pumping Station
# *
! (
0 25 50 100 Metres 150 200
LEWISHAM
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345
C32XZ
CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-01992 Date : .................................. 2011/10/26 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
* #
Title:
APPENDIX 4 AERIAL PLAN C32XZ SITE
View looking south down Deptford Church Street with the site across the other side of the road.
View looking across the site from the north-western corner towards the east. Coffey Street runs along the left hand side of this photograph.
Appendix 4 Page 3
View looking south across the eastern side of the site from Coffey Street.
View along Coffey Street to the north of the site with St Pauls Church on the left of the photograph.
Appendix 4 Page 4
View towards the western side of the site from Coffey Street to the north with St Josephs RC Primary School in the background.
Appendix 4 Page 5
Appendix 4 Page 6
Appendix 5 Transport plan
Appendix 5 Page 1
TI AL
EN
FI D
! (
TOWER HAMLETS
&
! (
CS33X Greenwich Pumping Station
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Site CSO (Directly Controlled) Pumping Station Transport Access Route TfL Road Network Thames Path
# *
Parking
! (
Traffic Calming C32XZ GREENWICH

0 30
London Cycle Routes
60
120
Metres
180
240
300
LEWISHAM
Parking
* #
Title:
APPENDIX 5 TRANSPORT PLAN C32XZ SITE
1
2m 5.
3
nd ou gr ay l P
5 5
5 1 5 3
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
Status:
1 1 1
S t P C a h u u l r s c h
BUS STOP RELOCATED
SITE BOUNDARY AREA
EXISTING BUS STOP
BS
F F E Y S T R E E T
13
t o
CSO DROP SHAFT
C R
2 2
18
PEDESTRIAN DIVERSION ROUTE
INDICATIVE AREA OF EXCAVATION
0 7
B o r o
C o n s t &
CSO INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
TWO WAY WORKING ON SOUTHBOUND CARRIAGEWAY. 3.25m RUNNING LANES THROUGH WORKS REMOVE CENTRAL RESERVATION
FOOTWAY CLOSURE
B R O
N Z E
BS TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL
5 7
OFFSIDE LANE CLOSURE 10 m
TRAFFIC FILTERED DOWN TO 3.25m RUNNING LANE
40 m
5 8
Revision History
SCALE 1 : 500
6 0
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JSHE
EPER
PSTV
16/09/2011
BS
ALTERNATIVE BUS STOP
B R O
t H 1 r e r r a F
N Z E
SUSPENSION OF BUS LANE
37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF

Location Code: OS Reference:
S T R E E T
The Point, 7th Floor,
D
2m 5.
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
TQ3778
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS
Site Name: Project Name:
C32XZ - DEPTFORD CHURCH STREET
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN C32XZ

5m 4.
Drawing No.: Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
PLOTTED ON
04/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_2\dms04460\100-DE-TRA-C32XZ-872101.dgn
c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
100-DE-TRA-C32XZ-872101
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT
r af t
6 2
e s u o H h c n i F
0 o4 1t
Project Group:
LONDON TIDEWAY TUNNELS
WASTE 5 0
Location / Town:
GREENWICH - CS32X - DEPTFORD SR
1:500
A1
AA
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
1 5 0
71
2 0 0 mm
C
w S m i
S T R E E T
1 1 5 1 0 5 9 1 1 1 8 3 1 1 0 7
9 8
BS
BS BUS STOP SUSPENDED
OFFSIDE LANE CLOSURE
t o
L B
C R
B d y
R a v e n s b o u r n e
5 9
3 0 1
8 3
1 0 9 8 7 8 5
N
c i l ho at C s ol h ho ep Sc os J y ar St
m i Pr
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
1 2 9 1 9 9 7 7 1 5 1 1 9 0 1 7 7
1 1 7 9 7 3 9
D n F
THIS DRAWING
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE
C R
SUSPENSION OF BUS LANE
NUMBER 100019345
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
D E P T F O
R C
M P 5
4 3 o t 3 2
R D C H U R C H S T R E E T
TRAFFIC FILTERED DOWN TO 3.25m RUNNING LANE
NOTES TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW: NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFFSIDE CLOSURES OF A2209 DEPTFORD CHURCH STREET ON APPROACH TO WORKS. FULL CLOSURE OF NORTHBOUND CARRIAGWAY ADJACENT TO WORKS WITH NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC RUNNING ON OFFSIDE LANE OF SOUTHBOUND CARRIAGWAY. 1 9 2. CENTRAL RESERVATION REMOVED THROUGH TRAFFIC t o TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT LAYOUT AS REQUIRED. 2 4 3. BUS LANES SUSPENDED IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, EXTENT TO BE AGREED WITH TfL. 4. EASTERN FOOTWAY CLOSED ADJACENT TO WORKS, PEDESTRIANS DIVERTED VIA OPPOSITE FOOTWAY AND EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS. 1.
R O ES LU O TI
N
W AY
2m 6.
3 5
B R U F O R D
PROVISIONAL DURATIONS: MAIN SITE - 18-20 MONTHS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT - 4-5 MONTHS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PHASES - 1
10
CRO T REE D ST EL I SSF
t o
6
7
3 8
1 4
3 9
t o
C O U R T
LEGEND
12
AREA OF ROAD/FOOTWAY CLOSURE
4 0
R C
C k ar P ar
t os P
1 5
M a n s i o n s
TEMPORARY WORKS
t o
4 1
2 0
EXCAVATION
8m 5.
4 9
SITE WORKING AREA
B E R T H O
5 0
PEDESTRIAN/CYCLE DIVERSION ROUTE
S T R E E T
TRAFFIC DIVERSION ROUTE
4 2
CONSTRUCTION ROUTE
C R
BUS STOP
m ng i l oo P 9m 4.
nd ou gr ay l P ub S l E
C
1 s r e g n o o t 0 4
H e s u o
y ar br Li
t o Br 14 H ow ou ne s e 1
a t S
o 0 4
e s u o
6m 4.
M s c ni ha ec
D E P T F O
C T B
h at P
R D C H
s r e p e e k l H e s u o
U R C
H
S T R E E T
Appendix 6 Services and geology plan
Appendix 6 Page 1
1
305
2
7 1 o t 4 1
x 0 61
1608
3
3609
4
CES y s s a b m E
300
) l o o h c S (
5
3 0 0
5609
6
Status:
Methodist
5.8m
0 0 3
381
ZBV217813
PH
2610
5 0 3
T E E R T ES D Y L C
2 6 x 7
9 1 2 1
125mm HPPE
1611 1602
2602
D E N O D N A B A
1 25mm HPPE ACE NG PL I NL GRI
6.1m
TCBs LB
T C B
SE
5 2 o2 1t 2 2
0606
227
00 x 8 60 1 1
1610
150
1612
2611 1 2 5 m m CP
PCs
Shelter
5 2 2
0612
5 2 2
Sorting Office
9 1 2
0611
4 1
3 0 5
1 52
45
3 4
57
RE 4" FI
2 5 1
WO
3
5 2 2 0613
52 1
7 1 2
1613 0 5 1 0614
1 5 0 1614
A B 3 0 5 A N D O N E 1 D 7
3 1
8 0 2
H P P E
A B A N D O N E D
2607
0607
5 1
2603
2 1
9 2 2
4
2 1 o t 6
1 1
3
5 0 3
3604
1604B
1 8 3
LB
1603B
E P P T H E E R m T m 5 NS 2 O 1 T R E M A L
4 1
5 1 2
1 5 2
5 1 2
oc at
5.5m
5 0 3
m m 5 2 1
0602
E P P H
229
4601 SE
C y r u b l A
5 4
5 4
8 6
3607 IL-0.24m
D E N O D N A B A
4 2 o t 9 1
2505A
9 2 o t 5 2
1 4 2502
1 3
2501
2486 5 0 3
5 0 2
1
6 3
3 2
3 0 2
6
1 3
a 5 0 2
3 1
9 3 1505 E P P m H m 5 2 1 5 0 3
5 0 3
CP
5 T 0 3 E E R T YS R U B L A
229
E SE P P H m m 5 2 1
34
WO
DP
9 9 71 9 1
9 2 2
229
5 9 1
1 8
T E E R T " ES 3 D Y H
9 5
9 2
8 1
1 9 1
3 9 1
2 8 1
676 1
9 8 1
Prussia House
1 5
7 3
9 4
3 4
52 1
3 5
3 7
3 2
9 3
41
7
9
6
9 1
17
2481
5 8 1
21
1 1
3 1
2504
3 8 11 8 1
PH
FB FB
6 1
2503
D E N 5 0 O 3 D N A B A
S G N I D L I m U m 5 NB N 2 1 YA R A M
5 0 3
E P P H
9 2 2
2505B
0 6 8 5
IL-5.47m
0 2
" 3
T E E R T NS O T L I M A H
9 7 1
E P P m H m 5 2 1
2482
2 5 1
m m 0 5
1 7
1 5 2
Hall
Playground
D Fn
6 2 1 1
4 2
D E N O D 5 0 3 N A B A
s l u a P t S y r o t c e R
7 7 1
t r u o C s i b I
3
a t S b u S l E
5 7 1
1 7 1
3 7 1
5.1m
7
6
0 1
3
2 1
1
1401
m m 0 8 1
3403
R C
m m 0 0 2
HP PE "
Car Park
914
x 762
9 6 1
4401
1410
5 6 1
22 9
Park
IL-0.07m
0403
WO
H P P E
5 0 3
3 6 1
1 6 1
81 3
RE
E P P T E H E R T m m HS 0 C 9 N I F F
5 0 3
1406
1 21 9
0406
AB AN DO NE D
2402
SL
3 4 1
SL I P
RE
5.8m
ST RE ET
1t o
1 0 A T 0 E m m
5 0 3
KN OT T
0409
1 4 1
9 3 1
W
0411
CI
WO
1404 SE
1412
A B A N D O N E D
4 0 Fi n c hH o u s e
SE WE R
S R I a N i l E w S a y S A E r c S h e T s
3 5 o1 7t 4 1
B U
T E E R T YS E F F O C
4406
LI NE D
T I T A N
5 4 1
" 6"
a r dB d y
3"
D e p t f o r dS t a t i o n
3 0 5
ABANDONED
305
HPPE
a 7 3 1
1 1
7 3 1
1 25mm
6.0m
0303
M P5
->
0301
1302
3 "
R E S 1877 O L U T I O
RD FO PT DE
16
Car Park
2 2 5
IL0.1m
1904
381
381
1 21 9 PE1 00 HPPE"
0.6m
Job Centre
4 2 1
x 8 1 3
Community Centre
NWA Y
1903
381
PW
I DONI A STREET
17 to 20
21 to 24
25
31
32
4.9m
4 91
M HW
D E N O D N A B A
Y EWA L A D H C O R
0302
Presby
9 2 1 7 2 1
El Sub Sta
MP 5.25
WI TH 25mm CREEKS 1
1303
SL
E P P m H m 5 2 1
2 2 5
GAS
0307 IL-5.65m
5 2 1
Car Park
4 1 o1 0t 1 1
Swimming Pool
I DE
3 0 5
- LOW PRESSURE ABOVE 300mm DIAMETER - INTERMEDIATE, MEDIUM OR HIGH PRESSURE 0 100 m
3 0 5
4312 2134
1870
Posts
5301
) H C N A R Y B E S D N O M R E B 1( . O R N WE E L S VE E W L O L 4 3 1 2
2 2 5 BOC 1445 2 2 5
10 m
5.9m
PCs
Post
) H C N A R Y B E S D N O M R E B 1( . O R N WE E S L E V E W L O L
1"
FV
SE
305
Foot Bridge
DB
25mm HPPE 1
2 1 3 4
DP
Creekside
nH a Me
4 3 1 2
MLW
d Mu
SCALE 1 : 1000
Revision History
4313 DS BS 4225 SE FV SE 4211 4306
" 6" CI SLI P LI NED 305
5.2m
2 1 3 4
5206 DP SE
Centre
4 3 1 2
3
2210 2206 SE SE
4 3 1 2
1205
Bank
El Sub Sta
N I A M 1( . O R N WE E L S VE E W L O L ) E N I L
0 6 o t 1
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
381
VT IL-5.7m
e s u o H n e d l o H
WW PS
Library
4 3 1 2
AA
DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
SDYE
PSTV
DARD
12/08/2011
0207
Giffen Square
1201
381
4212
(Community Centre)
1a
1 1 1
381
229
DM04718
IL-5.71m 2207 SE
IL-5.91m
Posts
2211
5
2219
Market
3202
125mm HPPE SE
2218
E P P m H m 5 2 1 5 0 3
3203
5 0 3
5 0 3
Building B
5208
6 8 2 2
0 0 1 E m P m 0 5 H 2 T D WI E N I P L I L IS "C 6 " 6 8 2 2
Y S WA A L G U O D
9 2 2
6.2m 1212
T E E R T NS I F F I G
5 0 3
LB
Building C
IL-5.88m
D E N O D N A B A
0 5 1 o t 2 8
TCB
4218
1206 1207
D E N O D N A B A
5 0 3
5 0 3
40
4213
5 0 3
" 3
3.5m 3.3m
Posts
E R I F
FB
) E N I N L I A M 2 ( . O R N WE E L S VE E W L O L
PS IL-4.65m
9 0 1
CL5.75m IL-5.59m
19
21
35
37
5 0 3 1 0 1
Margaret MacMillan Park

2438
0203 SE
229
1213 SE IL-5.77m LS 3206 3207 E P P m H m 5 2 1
e s u o wH a h s l Wi
8 3 4 2
305
1 0 1
0219
0211
305
5 39 9
<-
229
SE
Tidemill Primary School 1 "
305
7 7
1892
229
381
1 9
2223
Mud
a t e r
x 762
D
0104
i g h
El Sub Sta
an d
5t o7
Warehouse
GREENWICH TERMINAL SPS
e a n
a t e r
x 3353
i g h
Car Park
4 66 6
305
Playground
Crane
PS
Site Name: Project Name:
C32XZ - DEPTFORD CHURCH STREET
Princess Louise Building

1 to 46
2 1 o t 2
Lobo House
2103 2102 2106 4111
0102
1 1
2 1
F r a n k h a mH o u s e
41 1 5
0 x 61
7 1
0110
HALES STREET
E V O R EG L L I V N E L G
305
6 3t o6 9
NEW BUTT L ANE
4 91
0 8
HPPE
H T D WI E
5mm
PLOTTED ON
02/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
D E N O D N A B A
IL1.28m
4113
e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_2\dms04460\100-DL-PNC-C32XZ-172001.dgn
" 6 "
I C
R C
W E S V E L H G I H L E
5 0 3
" E P P 0 H 0 1 E m P m 5 2 1
305
6 1
A B A N D O N E D
5 85 6
305
305
3101 ABANDONED
305
3 0 5
BOC 2700
7 6 0 1
H T 5 WI 30 D E N I L
3
4.7m
4104 SU
R E 1 . O N N I A M (
) E N I L 7 6 0 1
Z 5 5 9 / 5 6 8 / 6 1 1 / 8 0 4 / 8 4 8
1883
3 m m 5 2 1
5 0
5101
Drawing Title:
SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN C32XZ

Drawing No.: Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
P E I D I L S K S E E
0 5 1
100-DL-PNC-C32XZ-172001
3"
0 0 1 41 P E
0 1
" E P P H
Harold Wharf
THAMES TUNNEL
IL-0.54m
Contract Name:
r af t
y r u b s e t f a h S e h T e r t n e C n a i t s i r h C
1 8
91 4
Wa r e h o u s e
WB
IL-0.69m
Location / Town:
GREENWICH - CS32X - DEPTFORD SR
e a n
1:1000
A1
AA
5 0
6 5
5 5
3 5
6 4
2 5
2 2 9
5 0 3
1879
5.7m
to 14
37 North Wharf Road,

PS
Tk
Paddington, London W2 1AF

9 2 2
2202
) E N I N L I A M 2 ( . O R N WE E L S VE E W L O L
IL1.56m
1101 SE
50
E P P m H m 5 2 1
6.3m
5 0 3 1880
--->
V A U G H A NW 0212 I L L I A MS C L O S E
13
27
29
43
2 4 3 8
8 3 4 2
VMH VC
Building A
11
5211
3.3m
Bank
2224
5 0 3
2225
4.7m
9 79 9
T E E R T MS A H K N A R F
e s u o H s r e p e e k l o o h c S
5 0 3
5.3m
The Granary
E P P m H m 5 2 1
4.9m
4220
5207 PS
4217
6"
F I R E
Mud
4 0 0 0
" 3
0 0 4 2
Cremer House
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
GREEP1ZZ
UBR
Sub Process:
MBRI
ALSO GREEP1AZ
FV
WASTE
1 0 0
0 8 o t 2 2
H T D WI
2c 2b
0 0 1 E m P m 0 5 2 LS
< -
Bank
914 x 610
4207 SE
1 to 60
El Sub Sta
305
8 3 4 2
Faircharm Trading Estate

IL-5.88m
on f i de nt i al
The Albany
Market
PS
3.3m
2 o1 8t
2 o1 8t
) E N I N L I A M 1( . O R N WE E L S VE E L W O L
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
h c r u h C
M e c h a n i c s P a t h
L i f t i n g Br i d g e
" 3
ML W
f o y d a L r u O n o i t p m u s s A e h t
US STREET OCTAVI
7 0
Rochdale Way
15
1 0 0 m m
9 5 1
9 2 2
A B A N D O N E D
2401 S T R E E T
1 2 5 m m H P P E
3 0 5
1 25 mm
WI TH
BS IL-4.64m
a 5 6 1
1 2 5 m m
C R O S S F I E L D
6 5 1
PE
Car
3 0 5
6.3m
s l u a P t S h c r u h C
5 0 3
1 00
t r u o C r e p i p d n a S
6.3m
2 4 5 9
IL-5.45m 2408
139a 137c
5.2m
3 0 5
C R
S t J o s e p h s C a t h o l i c P r i m a r y S c h o o l
C32XZ (4220m)
DP IL-1.44m 3301
SITE BOUNDARY
2458 CR O S S F 1 2 I E 5 L D 30 m 5 m S T RE E T
5 1 1
5 5
5 0 1
o 3t 1
1 1 1 3 1 1 7 8 89 0 19 1 0 9 5 8 17 3 8 1 8
0 1
Hall
1503
23
1 2
1502
2 1
t r u o C n i r a d n a M
t o
2 2
8 2
6 1
5 1
4 2
6 2
2 2 o t 4 1
a t S b u lS E
CP D E N O D N A B A
8 8 1
1 3
4 4
6 2
0 3
2 3 1 1 5 4 2 2
6 4
2 4
1 1
2 2 9
2489
2 3
52 1
T R U O DC R O F U R B
WO
CR
3503B SE
3511
WO
4501
3 0 5 m m 0 5
5 3
IL-0.15m
8 3
WO
5 30
4 1 o t 7
6 o t 1
0 2 o t 5 1
1 4
4502
9 3
0 4
m1 m 0 5
DP
2 2 o t
WO
CR
s n o i s n a M e n r u o b s n e v a R
m m 5 0 0 3 8 1
R C
T E E R T NS O H T R E B
6.2m
R C
y d BB &L t s n o C o r o B
5 0 3
E P P m H m 5 2 1 T E E R T ES Z N D O E R B N O D N A B A
553
0 4 o t 1
e s u o H s r e g n o C
" 3
3306
4302
5 0 3
554
5 0 3
5 0 3
5 0 3
0 4 o t 1
H P P E
3302
e s u o H r e r r a F
3 0 5
0 1 o t 4
5 0 3
R WA D E
4 0 2
5 o t 1 7
5 0 3
D E N O D N A B A
4602
5 0 3
Shelter
SE
3610
2 4 o t 7 63 3 o t 1 3
m m 0 0 1
m m 0 0 1
9 4
0 5
WO
2 4
FH 5 0
552
SU
" 3
8 1 d n 6a 1
d c 1 1
a 1
b 1
D E N O D N T A E B E A R T DS
0601
2518
8 4 o t 3 4
a t S b u S l E
WO
7 5
WO
5 0 3
4 2 d n a 0 2
1 8 3
1601B
D E N O D N A B A
1 2 5 m m H 3 5 0 5 P 0 A 3 P B E A N D O N E D t
H C P R P E E E KR O A D
1 2 5 m m
2 7 4 7
Akwaaba Centre
4t o8
4 1 2
225
5 0 3
1 6 7 6
A B Mission A N D O N E D 1 2 5 3 0 m 5 m H P P E
2 6 x 7
D E N O D N A B A
9 1 2 1
T E E R T NS A L L I M c M
246
3602B SE
N
5605
GEOLOGY
9 2 2
Rachel McMillan Nursery School

4617 4612 DP 4613
D E N O D N A B E A O B T
5 0 3
McMillan Student Village

D E N O D N A B E A O B T
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
ONED ABAND 305
PH
ARM ADA
McMillan 9 2 2 Student
STREET
200mm
Village
E m 7 90mm HPP5.
4 t o 1 7 ( b e l o w )
4 4
2 4
6 1 o t 0 1
0 4 o t 4 3
8 o t 2
2 3 o t 6 2
13
4 2 o t 8 1
12
70
4 2
2 6
O H CL BEEC SE
0 2 2
8 1 2
6 1 2
Ground level
PROPOSED NETWORK PENDING ADOPTION AGREEMENT - JARVIS CONSTRUCTION - 10-17258 RACHEL MCMILLAN STUDENT ACCOMMODATION - CREEK ROAD
LOW
105 (m OD + 100)
) H P (
676 1
4 1 2
H) BRANC NDSEY BERMO 1 ( . ER NO L SEW LEV E 229
PE N PI D GREE DEPTFOR
55
59
4616
5 0 3
5608 CP
4.1m
5601
5 1 41
x 3353
1 5 2
CP
TCB
VMH
97 (m OD + 100) Base of Made Ground and Superficial 92.5 (m OD + 100) Base of Lambeth Group DRAWING LOCATION
m 25m E 1 HPP
9
52 1
D E N O D N A B A
2 2 9
E P P m H m 5 2 1
4615
5.1m
5 0 3
REET G H ST I O RD H DEPTF
6 0 2
E 4614 P P m H m 5 2 1
457
m 25m DE 1 SI H K T I EE ER W CR SEW EET STR NED TT I KNO P L NED SLI 3 NDO 1 CI x 8 ABA 6" " 9 21 1
m 200m
NED P LI SLI 2" CI 1 "
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345 Base of Thanet Sand Formation 76.10 (m OD + 100) THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER
5505B
o 8t 5 5 6
676 1
8 9 1
6 9 o1 0t 9 1
HPPE 25mm 1
m 8 . 5
3 7 9 1 5 1 99 1 7 1 9 1 9 2 1 3 7 0 7 1 17 0 5 1 9 7 9
NED ABANDO
229
5 1 41
o 1t 6
00 PE1 50mm TH 2 WI
P SLI 00" DI 1 "
P SLI 00" DI 1 "
0 1
x 3353
STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME. COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO THE TUNNEL DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
2 1
t r u n Co r e t t Bi
2 o4 1t
PPE 80mm H 1
2958
HUR O RD C DEPTF
4.6m
457
0 8 1
NED ABANDO
WO
SE
E" HPP 00 PE1
BS
m 25m 1
TH I NED W LI
5503
TH I NED W LI
REET CH ST x
5 1 41
m 25m 1
0 7 1
NOTES:
m m 0 8 1 5 0
3
5511
3353
m 25m 1
00 PE1 90mm
5 0 3
m m 0 0 2
1. LIMITED FIBRE OPTIC AND BT COMMUNICATION CABLES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. DETAILS OF THESE CABLES AND OTHER SERVICES AND THIRD PARTY ASSETS TO BE CONFIRMED BY FURTHER STUDIES AND UTILITY SEARCHES. 2. INVERT LEVEL OF SHAFT SHOWN. BASE OF CONSTRUCTION WILL BE BELOW THIS LEVEL AND WILL DEPEND ON CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE. THIS IS ONLY PROVISIONAL AS DESIGN IS AT EARLY PRELIMINARY STAGE.
2 2
676 1
90mm
8 6 o1 6t 6 1
0 2
8 1
00 PE1
t r u o Co g n mi a Fl
4 91
HPPE"
Playground
HPPE"
NED P LI LI 200" DI S "
676 1
2 6 1
x 762
PPE 90mm H
NED P LI I SLI 200" D "
LEGEND
38
FW FW
3 1
2 1
LOW ANCH) DSEY BR BERMON 1 ( NO. SEW ER LEV EL
0 1
5 1 41
1 1
FOUL WATER
x 3353
2 6
SW
SW
SURFACE WATER
P LI 2" CI S 1 "
676 1
T E E R T ES Z N O R B
4.6m
0 5 1
6 4 1
a 4 4 1
CLEAN WATER
Chalk
G G
GAS
00 25mm PE1 TH 1 WI
CABTV
CABTV
FIBRE OPTICS
2 x 76 00 4 PE1 91 80mm TH 1 WI
4 4 1
305
TH NED W I LI
229
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CR
LV
LV
LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
3"
5305
4.5m
BS
SYNTHETIC GEOLOGICAL PROFILE DERIVED FROM THE BGS 1 5 0 m m F I R E LONDON LITHOFRAME50 MODEL, HISTORICAL BOREHOLES 5315 0 . 7 5 " AND BERRY (1979). PLEASE NOTE, GROUND CONDITIONS MAY VARY AND THIS DATA SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR DETAILED ENGINEERING PURPOSES 3 0 5
5306 IL-0.56m
HV
HV
HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES
4 3 1
00 PE1 250mm
381
EXISTING TUNNELS
3"
5 1 41
5302 VMH
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
WATER STORM & FOUL SEWERS
Bollard
E HPP 80mm 1
1 8
353 x 3
- ALL TW ASSETS - ALL TW ASSETS
6 2 1
39
M OR ST
------>
4.3m
OTHER SIGNIFICANT UTILITIES ARE DEFINED AS: TELECOMS ELECTRICITY - ONLY FIBRE OPTIC CABLES - HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES - LARGE BANKS OF LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
E 90mm HPP NED ABANDO

381
676 1
OW FL ER OV
PPE m H 25m 1
8 1 1 6 1 1
x 2 76 NED I P L LI I S " D 200 "
e wn o Br e s u Ho
o 1t
4 1
1 4
381
8 0 1
4 0 1
y B Bd &L t s n o Co r Bo W CCL
hW g i
n a Me
e c i f Of l i c n u Co
r e t a
305
h g Hi
D AN AB
dC r o f t p De
r e t Wa
00 E1 m P 80m 1 TH WI
RD TFO DEP
ED ON
25mm 1
k e e r
5 o4 1t
e s u Ho l l e t s Ca
CHU RCH
NED NDO ABA
3"
EET STR
0 29 9
EET G H STR I O RD H DEPTF
NED P LI LI 2" CI S 1 "
8 8
63mm
25mm 1
4 91
2 o1 8t
4 8
e s u w Ho a h s l Wi
DONED 3" ABAN

305
0 x 61
0 28 8
0 o6 1t
NED P LI LI 200" DI S "
25mm 1
90mm HPPE ABANDONED
6 87 7
5 30
00 mm PE1 TH 250 WI
o8 1t
e s u n Ho o i b Al
4 7
D NDONE 3" ABA
305
0 7
ACE CO M ET PL
25mm 1
00 25mm PE1 TH 1 WI
RE 6" FI
6 1 7 1
2 6
PE HP 305 25mm 1
6 0
8 1
SL 50" DI 1 "
4 o3 2t 3
4 5
2 2
O L G AR C EL
Appendix 7 Construction phase layout
Appendix 7 Page 1
h c r u h C
6
Status:
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
THIS DRAWING
DEPTFORD STORM RELIEF SEWER MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, CSO DROP SHAFT 10m ID DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER EXISTING WALL TO BE TEMPORARILY REMOVED STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE FLAP VALVE CHAMBER SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE 2.5m SQUARE CONNECTION CULVERT THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
T E E R T S Y E F F O C
EGRESS
B
100m
5.8m
KEY:
EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND HANDLING AREA
CR
STOCKYARD, WORKSHOP AND STORES
1070m 200m SITE BOUNDARY AREA = 4220m
OFFICES, WELFARE AND CANTEEN
CSO DROP SHAFT, CSO CONNECTION CULVERT, PRIMARY CRANE, SECONDARY CRANE AND CSO INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
TEMPORARY WORKING AREA = 3112m SECONDARY CRANE
ACCESS
DISCLAIMER: INDICATIVE CONSTRUCTION PHASE ARRANGEMENT. BASED ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT.
750m PRIMARY CRANE
CR O S S F I E L D
7 0
10 m
10 m
SCALE 1 : 250
Revision History

R E S O L U T I O NWA Y
D
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ3677
UBR
Sub Process:
APUR

Location / Town: Site Name: Project Name:
WASTE 5 0
Sheet Size: Rev:
GREENWICH - CS32X - DEPTFORD SR C32XZ - DEPTFORD CHURCH STREET
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT C32XZ - CSO

Drawing No.: Scale:
4.9m
PLOTTED ON 02/11/2011 BY LOCATION : e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_4\dms04460\100-DL-PNC-C32XZ-172002.dgn
100-DL-PNC-C32XZ-172002
r af t
1:250
A1
AB
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
S T RE E T
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AB AA
SECOND ISSUE FIRST ISSUE
SDYE AA
PSTV DARD
DARD ILGE
12/08/2011 12/11/2010
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
Appendix 8 Operational phase layout
Appendix 8 Page 1
h c r u h C
6
Status:
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
THIS DRAWING
DEPTFORD STORM RELIEF SEWER MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, CSO DROP SHAFT 10m ID DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER PERMANENT ACCESS STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE 6m x 5m FLAP VALVE CHAMBER SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE 2.5m SQUARE CONNECTION CULVERT THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
T E E R T S Y E F F O C
ACCESS
2m x 0.6m x 1.5m HIGH ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK
5.8m
m 9 1
m 2 2
PENSTOCK ACCESS
CR
VENTILATION COLUMN
PERMANENT HARDSTANDING FOR FUTURE CRANE ACCESS
m 5 2
PERMANENT HARDSTANDING FOR FUTURE CRANE ACCESS
m 2 2
EXISTING WALL
DISCLAIMER: INDICATIVE OPERATIONAL PHASE ARRANGEMENT. BASED ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT.
CR O S S F I E L D
7 0
10 m
10 m
SCALE 1 : 250
Revision History

R E S O L U T I O NWA Y
D
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ3677
UBR
Sub Process:
APUR

WASTE 5 0
Sheet Size: Rev:
GREENWICH - CS32X - DEPTFORD SR C32XZ - DEPTFORD CHURCH STREET
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT C32XZ

Drawing No.: Scale:
4.9m
PLOTTED ON 02/11/2011 BY LOCATION : e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_2\dms04460\100-DL-PNC-C32XZ-172003.dgn
100-DL-PNC-C32XZ-172003
r af t
1:250
A1
AB
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
S T RE E T
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AB AA
SECOND ISSUE FIRST ISSUE
SDYE AA
PSTV DARD
DARD ILGR
12/08/2011 12/11/2010
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
6
VENTILATION COLUMN (CSO)
Status:
WORK IN PROGRESS
Keyplan:
N
A
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND 107m (AOD +100) REMOVABLE COVER ABOVE WEIR (LOCKABLE) DATABASE RIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
NOTE:
4m
3m
6m
1. STRUCTURE TO BE PROTECTED BY REMOVABLE HANDRAILS IN THE TEMPORARY CASE. 2. POSITION OF COVERS ARE VARIABLE WITHIN 10m FROM THE EDGE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE LOCATION IS BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT 3. CLADDING OF VENTILLATION BUILDING TO SUIT LOCATION AND AESTHETICS. 4. ALL TOP STRUCTURES TO HAVE:ACCESS STAIRS/LADDER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT HAND RAILING 5. ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.
GROUND LEVEL
10000
5m
REMOVABLE COVERS ARE SPLIT UP INTO SECTIONS AND SUPPORTED BY BEAMS, WHICH ARE ALSO REMOVABLE
1m DIA
SCALE 1:50
DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF TOP STRUCTURE ABOVE CSO SHAFTS ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK (CSO)
- - - - - - 1500 150 0 50
Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
- - AB DRAFT-SECOND ISSUE IL RS
Dsgnr
GT DS
Chkd
GT CH
Appd
27-11-09 - 22-05-09
Date
AA DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
Iss Description
60
2000
Location Code: OS Reference: Security Reference: Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
---
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
LTTDT
WASTE LONDON N/A
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:

Drawing Title:
SCALE 1:25
GENERIC ELEVATION AND TOP STRUCTURE FOR OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT - CSO SITES
Drawing No.:
100-DH-GEN-00000-000001
PLOTTED ON 04\12\09 BY Andy.Purdy LOCATION : Thames Tideway Tunnel x:\project\371840\cad\design data\cad thames\drawings\planning-consents\Routewide\100-DH-GEN-00000-000001.dgn c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
NTS
A1
AB
100
200mm
VARIBLE DEPENDING ON
Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables
Transport Site considerations Access to road network Comments The construction site will be accessed from Crossfield Street with egress onto Coffey Street. To enable access/egress, on-street parking on Crossfield Street and Coffey Street will require removal. Coffey Street features traffic calming which will require removal to enable access. Crossfield Street is subject to a 30mph speed limit while Coffey Street is subject to a 20mph speed limit. Visibility from the site egress appears to be adequate in both directions, providing parking is removed. Access to the TLRN (A2) is constrained due to Deptford Church Street being a dual carriageway. This results in construction traffic having to turn left out of Coffey Street away from the A2. The route would therefore require construction traffic to use Creek Road, Norman Road and Greenwich High Road. There is a rail bridge over Deptford Church Street with a vehicular height restriction of 4.8m. The traffic calming on Coffey Street will require removal to enable construction vehicle egress from the site. Distance 0.6km from the TLRN (A2) to site. Distance from site to TLRN (A2) 1.8 km. A preliminary transport access plan is attached as Appendix 5. The site is located some distance from the river, although river access is not essential as excavated material will be transported away by road. Mitigation required and conclusions Conclusion: Access route is possible subject to the removal of on-street parking on both Crossfield Street and Coffey Street, as well as traffic calming on Coffey Street. Access route to the TLRN (A2) encounters the constraints identified above, as well as a rail bridge with a height restriction.
Access to river
The site is located some distance from the river, although river access is not essential as excavated material will be transported away by road.
Appendix 9 Page 1
Transport Site considerations Access to rail Comments Use of rail is unlikely to be feasible due to the small quantities of excavated material produced by a CSO site. Access to East London Line Depot via Deptford Church Street, A200 Creek Road/Evelyn Street, Abinger Grove, Arklow Road, Edward Street and Milton Court Road. Constraints on route include those identified on Crossfield Street and Coffey Street as well as on-street parking and speed cushions along Abinger Grove, Arklow Road and Edward Street, which are residential streets. Milton Court Road also contains speed humps which require removal. Route to rail runs under a rail bridge on Arklow Road, which is subject to a width restriction of 7ft and a height restriction of 12 3, and a further two rail bridges on Edward Street with 121 height restrictions. The East London Line Depot has the potential to be used during the day, although significant use constraints and issues with loading would exist. Distance is 1.5km from site to rail access and 2km from rail access to site. Some parking could be provided on site for workforce. Limited alternative parking is available on surrounding roads. Large amounts of on-street parking spaces will be displaced by the site access due to the requirement to remove all parking on Crossfield Road and Coffey Street to enable access for HGVs. Mitigation required and conclusions Route to East London Line Depot contains many constraints and is less suitable. The route runs under height restricted bridges on Arklow Road and Edward Street, and through the residential area on Abinger Grove, Arklow Road, Edward Street and Milton Court Road. Route also contains on-street parking throughout residential areas and several traffic calming measures which will require removal. The East London Line Depot has the potential to be used during the day, however significant constraints and issues with loading exist.
Parking
Some parking could be provided on site for workforce, with limited alternative parking available on surrounding roads. Large amounts of on-street parking spaces will be displaced by site access. Alternative parking may need to be found for these spaces.
Appendix 9 Page 2
Transport Site considerations Public transport accessibility Traffic management Comments PTAL 3-4 (medium) as identified within Table 2.3. Parking on both Crossfield Street and Coffey Street, as well as traffic calming on Coffey Street, will require removal to enable access to the site. The interception chamber for the site is located on Deptford Church Street. Construction of this interception chamber will require some traffic management. A preliminary transport management plan is attached as Appendix 5. Mitigation required and conclusions Reasonable potential for workforce to access the site via public transport. Parking on both Crossfield Street and Coffey Street, as well as traffic calming on Coffey Street, will require removal to enable access to the site. The interception chamber for the site is located on Deptford Church Street. Construction of this interception chamber will require some traffic management.
Summary: The site is considered to be less suitable as a CSO site in highway terms, as it will require the removal of a large amount of on-street parking bays and traffic calming to enable access to the site. Traffic management will be required on Deptford Church Street to construct the interception chamber. The route to the TLRN (A2) is possible, although constrained, via Creek Road and then Norman Road and Greenwich High Road. The route from the TLRN to the site features a height restriction. The route to the nearest rail link contains additional restrictions in the form of on-street parking, speed cushions and bridges with height and width restrictions. However, rail transport is unlikely to be feasible due to the small quantities of excavated material produced by a CSO site. The site is remote from the river, although river access is not essential for a CSO site. Some parking could be provided on site for the workforce, with limited additional parking available on surrounding roads. There is reasonable potential for the workforce to use public transport to access the site.
Appendix 9 Page 3
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Designations, including archaeological priority areas Comments The site is located within the Lewisham Archaeological Priority Areas (APAs). Mitigation required and conclusions A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A programme of detailed desk-based research will be required to determine the extent of potential archaeological remains. This may be followed by geophysical survey and trial trench evaluation.
Summary of historical uses
The historic mapping shows St Pauls Church (c 1730) to the north of the site, where it remains to the present day. Until recently, terraced housing was shown running alongside Crossfield Street to the south. In 1920, the immediate surroundings of the church were labelled as a recreation ground and the site itself was a small park. In 1895, the 1920s recreation ground surrounding the church was labelled as Graveyard Disused. A large, sub-triangular structure, probably a monument, and The Rectory were located on the northern side of Coffey Street to the north of the site. The site itself contains features suggesting a formally laid out park. These include a fountain and a pump. The 19th century mapping shows an inn facing Church Street, approximately where the interception chamber is proposed. This is also labelled Hall on the late 19th century maps. This park was replaced by terraced housing in the later 19th century which has, in turn, been removed in recent times. There are no known receptors recorded within the NMR or GLSMR within the site. Until proven otherwise, it is prudent to assume the possibility that burials associated with St Pauls Church (Monument MLO90172) may exist within the site. While the earliest mapping available (1895) shows the site as a park, it is possible that the original graveyard extended to the
Potential receptors of very high or high value with the potential to be directly affected
A programme of detailed desk-based research will be required to determine the extent of potential archaeological remains. This may be followed by geophysical survey and trial trench evaluation.
Appendix 9 Page 4
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Comments south to include the current site. Further research is therefore required. Potential receptors of medium value with the potential to be directly affected There are no known receptors As above. recorded in the NMR or GLSMR within the site. Below-ground remains associated with the former park of 19th century date located in the southern area of the site may still exist, although subsequent terraced housing is likely to have destroyed or greatly disturbed any features. Equally, there may be slight potential for remains of medieval date within the site. Although 650m from the Thames, the general area of Deptford was already settled during the medieval period. Desk-based research including geotechnical monitoring may show that any potential features have been removed by later development. None identified at this stage. N/A Mitigation required and conclusions
Other receptors with the potential to be directly affected Extent of existing disturbance (if known)
Considerable as a result of terraced housing constructed in the late 19th century on the majority of the site. The housing is likely to comprise cellaring which may have disturbed any earlier remains. Possible preservation of medieval remains in the general location. A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Potential issues
Appendix 9 Page 5
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: This site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site from an archaeological perspective. Although it is possible that the site has the potential for archaeological remains associated with St Pauls Church to the north of the site, including burials associated with the church, this cannot be confirmed on the basis of the evidence available at this stage. If present, remains may include post-medieval burials which may have originally extended south into the site. Should desk-based research show burials to be present, they may be considered a constraint on development. However, the remediation of post-medieval human remains is regularly undertaken to facilitate development and may be acceptable, subject to a sufficiently detailed desk assessment and agreement of a written scheme of work. A burial licence would also probably be required. However, the work is likely to be costly and require a substantial period of time to undertake. There is also the possibility that earlier remains dating to the medieval period may be present as the general area was quite intensively occupied during this time. Further work is required to ascertain the extent of the St Pauls graveyard in the vicinity of the site.
Appendix 9 Page 6
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Designations including conservation areas, including trees Comments Listed buildings 34-40 Albury Street, Grade II*: 140m Church of St Paul, Grade A: 30m 13-45 Albury Street, Grade II: 170m Railway Viaduct Deptford, Grade II: 10m Ramp At Deptford Railway Station, Grade II: 130m Walls of former graveyard to old Baptist chapel (now demolished) and southeast angle of St Paul's churchyard, Grade II: 40m Walls and railings to north and east of St Paul's churchyard, Grade II: 80m Rachel McMillan Nursery, McMillan Street, Grade II: 220m Memorial To Margaret McMillan At Rachel McMillan Nursery School, McMillan Street, Grade II: 230m Locally listed buildings There are no locally listed buildings within 250m of C32XZ Conservation areas St Pauls: 0m Deptford High Street: 10m Registered historic parks and gardens There are no registered historic parks and gardens located within 250m of C32XZ. Mitigation required and conclusions In the case of listed buildings and conservation areas, a high-quality scheme design and adequate screening for the development may be required, as discussed below. A detailed desk-based assessment in conjunction with archaeology work would be required to further determine the likely impact of the development and to inform more detailed mitigation proposals.
Appendix 9 Page 7
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments Locally listed parks and gardens There are no locally listed parks and gardens within 250m of C32XZ. Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be directly affected There is potential for St Pauls Conservation Area to be directly affected by the proposals. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality and sensitive scheme design and/or screening would be required to ensure that the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the conservation area. Not applicable. Mitigation required and conclusions
Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be directly affected Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be indirectly affected
Not applicable.
Within 250m of the study area, there is one Grade II*, seven Grade II, and one Grade A listed buildings, and one conservation area (Deptford High Street) that may be indirectly affected by the proposals.
Of the receptors identified, two listed buildings (Grade A Church of St Paul and Grade II Railway Viaduct) and one conservation area (Deptford High Street) are within the potential visual envelope of the site and may have their settings and/or views to and from them impacted on as a result of the proposed development. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality scheme design and/or screening would be required to minimise any adverse impact. Not applicable.
Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be indirectly affected
Not applicable.
Appendix 9 Page 8
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Sensitive landscape character areas likely to be affected, including trees and TPOs Comments A sensitive site of amenity open space located within St Pauls Church Conservation Area, and set in a context of further amenity open space, mixed residential areas and setting of Deptford Church. Site is surrounded by railings and low wooden fence with amenity grass, mature trees and brick wall crossing the site. To the south and west of the site are a mix of institutional (St Josephs School), small industrial units (in the arches of the railway viaduct) and residential. Further open space and residential areas are located to the east and north. St Pauls Church is located immediately to the north of the site, and is an important local landmark, surrounded by brick walls that extend onto the site. Loss of mature trees protected by conservation area status and brick wall will increase the openness of site. The presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings would result in temporary adverse direct impacts on the character of the site and the surrounding streetscape. Temporary adverse indirect impacts would potentially be experienced by surrounding areas. Permanent elements would have the potential to adversely impact on the character of the site and the streetscape of surrounding streets. Mitigation required and conclusions Retention of trees where possible and protection in accordance with BS 5837. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality scheme design and avoiding the removal of existing plantings, where possible, would be required to minimise any adverse impact. Introduction of a landscape scheme to include appropriate surface treatments and planting to replace lost vegetation, enhance the character of the site and relate to the existing streetscape character of surrounding streets. The current indicative proposals would potentially impact the character of the amenity open space which it occupies and the adjacent streetscapes. They would indirectly impact the character of the adjoining areas, especially the setting of St Pauls Church.
Appendix 9 Page 9
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Potential views likely to be affected Comments During construction, views of cranes to and from St Pauls Conservation Area, the Grade A listed Church of St Paul, and Grade II listed railway viaduct may be impacted upon. A strategic view corridor crosses the eastern part of the site, and has the potential to be affected. Open views are available from neighbouring streets of amenity grass with occasional mature trees. Partially interrupted views are available from residential areas to the east and St Josephs School to the west. Raised open views are also available from travellers using the railway immediately south of the site. Distant interrupted views of the tree canopies on site are available from south of the site adjacent to Wavelengths Leisure Centre. The trees on site form part of an important tree-lined view along Deptford Church Street (A2209). Visual receptors in the south and east view the site in the foreground, with St Pauls Church visible beyond. During construction, the loss of trees would increase openness of existing views, result in loss of views of tree canopies in distant views and interrupt the tree-lined view along Deptford Church Street. Tall structures, such as cranes used for construction, would interrupt the open views and create an industrial outlook for all existing views. Mitigation required and conclusions During construction, the use of hoardings and appropriate lighting would reduce visual impact of construction activities from surrounding streets but would interrupt existing open views. The design and layout of the site should be given careful consideration to avoid/minimise interruption of a strategic view corridor and to minimise impact on views of St Pauls Church. Introduction of landscape scheme to replace loss vegetation and screen permanent structures would reduce potential impact on views. The design of the finished appearance of the top structure and ventilation column will require careful consideration. This site is considered less suitable from a townscape perspective, as the proposals would potentially result in an adverse visual impact on views from surrounding streets and overlooking residences and school. The replacement of amenity open space and mature trees with industrial structures have the potential to impact on a strategic view, the visual setting of St Pauls Church and local views.
Appendix 9 Page 10
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments During operation, views of top structure and ventilation column to and from the adjacent conservation area, and listed buildings may be a consideration. Permanent elements would be visible from surrounding areas including overlooking residences, St Josephs School and the railway. The elements would also partly interrupt views of St Pauls Church when viewed from the south. Particular considerations on sites where new permanent structures are required Permanent structures at C32XZ would potentially have a direct impact on St Pauls Conservation Area and potential indirect impacts on the Grade A listed Church of St Paul, the Grade II listed railway viaduct and Deptford High Street Conservation Area. Permanent structures at C32XZ have the potential to directly impact on the townscape character and local views. Careful consideration would need to be given to the location and appearance of any above-ground structures in the scheme design. Some form of screening and landscape treatment for the site would be required. The development would potentially result in a direct impact on St Pauls Conservation Area and could result in indirect impacts on two listed buildings (including the Grade A Church of St Paul), and one conservation Any permanent structures would need to be of a high-quality design and/or screened to preserve or enhance the appearance of St Pauls Conservation Area and the adjacent Deptford High Street Conservation Area, and to ensure there are no setting issues with the identified listed structures. Any permanent structures would need to be of a high-quality design and/or screened and landscaped in order that any direct impacts on the local townscape character and local views could be mitigated. The scheme design would need to be of a sufficiently high quality and may need to incorporate some screening in order that potential direct and indirect impacts of the development upon numerous built Mitigation required and conclusions
Potential issues
Appendix 9 Page 11
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Mitigation required and conclusions area. There is, however, the heritage receptors are potential to mitigate adverse reduced. Particular impacts through a high-quality attention will need to be scheme design and/or paid to the relationship of screening. C32XZ to St Pauls Conservation Area in order Construction and operation of to ensure that the character the development would or appearance of the potentially result in adverse conservation area is impacts on the local townscape character and local preserved and enhanced by the development. views. There is potential to partly mitigate adverse impacts The scheme design would through a high-quality scheme need to be of a high quality design and/or screening and and incorporate screening landscape treatment. and landscape treatment to partly mitigate the potential adverse impact on the local townscape character and local views. Comments
Summary: In terms of built heritage and townscape, the site is considered less suitable as a CSO site. There is potential for direct impacts on an open space within St Pauls Conservation Area. In addition to this, the proposals are likely to have an indirect impact on two listed buildings and one conservation area. Mitigation may be possible in the form of a high-quality scheme design and/or screening. There is also potential for adverse impacts on views from surrounding areas including residential properties, and on the character of the amenity space. The site would also indirectly impact the character of adjoining amenity open space. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality scheme design, screening and landscape treatment of the site, would partly reduce the adverse impacts on the local townscape character.
Appendix 9 Page 12
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Hydrogeological conditions (groundwater and surface water) From BGS Geological Model, giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river Comments Geology (thickness) Superficial geology and made ground (8m) Thanet Sand (13m) Chalk (to beyond the depth of shaft) Hydrogeology Piezometric level in Chalk aquifer: ~ -4mAOD (~10mbgl) from EA Jan 08 water level contouring Groundwater monitoring location EA hydrometry sites: TQ37-268 1.8km northwest of the site (water levels to Nov 2007) TQ37-254A, BL, BU 450m east of the site (water levels to May 2009) SPZs and SPZ groundwater users Located in a source protection zone (SPZ 3) defined by EA EA licensed groundwater abstractions and details One public water supply borehole within 2km radius Licence numbers: 28/39/43/0019 (12 boreholes) Location: 900m southeast of the site Operator: Thames Water Utilities Ltd Abstracted aquifer: Chalk A simple volumetric approach has been used to calculate the 400 days travel times of the abstraction borehole. A conservative mean annual recharge of 100mm/year was used to calculate a radius for licensed abstraction boreholes as follows: Public water supply abstraction borehole defined by EA. Licensed abstraction boreholes 1. 126m 2. 690m The shaft is located within the catchment Mitigation required and conclusions The drop shaft will be constructed to an invert level of approximately 54mbgl, therefore the shaft will be founded in the Chalk. Piezometric head(1) in Chalk will be approximately 44m above the base of the construction. Therefore, dewatering would be required and should be considered as part of geotechnical design.
Appendix 9 Page 13
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Comments Abstraction quantity (annual): 12,775,000m3 Two licensed abstraction borehole within 2km radius Licence numbers: 1. 28/39/44/0039 (1 borehole) 2. 28/39/42/0043 (1 borehole) Locations: 1. 1.2km northeast of the site 2. 1.85km west of the site Operator: 1. Trustees of National Maritime Museum 2. National Grid Co Plc Abstracted aquifer unit: 1. Chalk 2. Chalk Abstraction purposes: 1. Private water supply (general use) 2. Industrial, commercial and public services (non-evaporative cooling) Abstraction quantity (annual): 1. 20,000m3 2. 598,980m3 Unlicensed groundwater abstractions and details No abstraction borehole within 1km radius Mitigation required and conclusions area of the source protection zone (SPZ 3) of a public water supply abstraction (28/39/43/0019) as defined by EA.
Appendix 9 Page 14
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Borehole locations and depths Potential impacts on surface water features Comments There are 12 historical records of water wells within 1km radius. Depth range: 8.9 201.78m The site is located approximately 270m west of the Deptford Creek and approximately 530m from the Thames. It is considered that there is no direct pathway to either receptor due to the presence of defences on both watercourses and because of the distances from site to receptor. The only pollution risk is through site drainage. An impact on groundwater is likely since the drop shaft is to be constructed in Chalk (major aquifer) overlain by Thanet Sand and superficial deposits (minor aquifer) which will need to be dewatered. Mitigation may be required as construction of the drop shaft will take place within the source protection zone (SPZ 3) of one EA licensed abstraction and dewatering may affect water users. The drop shaft to be excavated in Chalk below the piezometric head, therefore dewatering of the Chalk, Thanet Sand and superficial deposits would be required. Possible saline intrusion caused by dewatering. Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable
Work needs to be undertaken in consideration of Pollution Prevention Guidelines PPG1, PPG5 and PPS23 with respect to site drainage.
Potential impacts on groundwater (resources and quality)
See below (Likely types of mitigation measures that will be required).
Likely types of mitigation measures that would be required
Possible provision of alternative groundwater supply.
Potential issues
Piezometric head in Chalk to be considered as part of geotechnical design. The issue of the appropriate disposal of discharges from dewatering to be considered. Dewatering to be kept to a minimum.
Appendix 9 Page 15
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: In terms of hydrogeology, this site is considered to be less suitable as a CSO site because the drop shaft is to be constructed in Chalk (principal aquifer, previously called major aquifer) and the site lies within the source protection zone (SPZ 3) of one EA licensed abstraction from the Chalk. Dewatering of the Chalk, Thanet Sand and superficial deposits will be required. The Chalk piezometric head is likely to be approximately 44m above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. In terms of surface water resources, this site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site because there is no direct pathway to the nearby surface water receptors for pollution. (1) Piezometric head is a specific measurement of water pressure above a datum
Appendix 9 Page 16
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Ecology Site considerations Statutory designations Comments Sue Godfrey Nature Park LNR is within 50m of the site. Mudchute Park Farm LNR is within 1,600m of the site. Brookmill Road LNR is within 1000m of the site. The site is designated as a site of nature conservation importance (SNCI). Site is approximately 500m from River Thames and Tidal Tributaries SMI. Twinkle Park SLINC is within 600m of the site. The site comprises the London BAP habitat, Parks, squares and amenity grassland. There is a low possibility that the mature trees on site may be used by roosting bats. Mature trees within the site have the potential to be used by common nesting birds. No direct impact on aquatic receptors. Mitigation required and conclusions None required.
Non-statutory designated wildlife sites
The permanent loss of part of the SNCI is likely to require compensatory provision within the local area.
BAP priority habitats
The loss of amenity grassland is likely to require compensatory provision. If bat roosts were found to be present, mitigation would be required, possibly including offsite provision. If mature scrub or trees are to be removed between March and September (the period when birds are likely to be nesting), an ecologist will need to confirm the absence of nesting birds prior to clearance. No further issues identified at this stage.
Protected or otherwise notable species within the study area
Potential issues
No further issues identified at this stage.
Summary: In ecology terms, the site is considered less suitable as a CSO site due to the potential temporary and permanent loss of a site of nature conservation importance. The permanent loss of part of the SNCI is likely to require compensatory provision within the local area. Basic ecological surveys would be required.
Appendix 9 Page 17
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Flood risk assessment Site considerations Flood risk zone Comments The majority of the site is located in Flood Zone 2 (one in 1,000-year event) as a result of potential flooding from the Deptford Creek; however, the south-western corner of the site bordering Deptford Church Street and Crossfield Street is in also in Flood Zone 3 (one in 100-year event). The site benefits from defences to the one in 1,000-year standard. Therefore, flood risk to the site is a residual risk based on a breach or overtopping of the defences. There is likely to be space on site for SUDS and the site is existing brownfield so runoff attenuation requirements will be less under PPS25. The superficial geology is likely to be permeable and hence infiltration SUDS are likely to be feasible; however, the site is over the total catchment area of a source protection zone for a groundwater abstraction and hence limitations on the types of runoff suitable for infiltration will apply. No further issues identified at this stage. Mitigation required and conclusions An FRA would be required to assess the residual risk of flooding to the site (small and sites).
Assessment of conditions for SUDS
N/A
Potential issues
No further issues identified at this stage.
Summary: In flood risk terms, the site is considered to be suitable as a CSO site. The site is defended from flooding from the Thames Tideway and Deptford Creek and there is likely to be space for surface SUDS, while infiltration SUDS may be suitable, given the underlying geology of the site. However, controls on quality of runoff will be applied, owing to the presence of a total catchment source protection zone underlying the site.
Appendix 9 Page 18
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Air quality Site considerations AQMA Comments The air quality objectives for NO 2 are exceeded on major roads in vicinity of site. The site is within an air quality management area declared for NO 2 and PM 10 . There are residential properties along Deptford Church Street (A2209) and the A2. The nearest residential properties are within 50m of the proposed site at Congers House. The main traffic issue in this area is exhaust emissions from vehicles along the A2209, A200 and A2 corridors. See above. Mitigation required and conclusions There is a need for more site specific data.
Sensitive receptors
There are relevant air quality sensitive receptors present along the route the construction traffic is likely to take and close to the proposed construction works.
Existing traffic issues
Additional vehicle emissions have a low potential to interfere with local air quality action plan policies. See above.
Existing sources of significant air pollutants Notable gaps in existing air quality monitoring
There is no data at likely access to A2209 and the nearest existing data indicates existing exceedance of AQLV. The risk from additional exhaust emissions from construction HGVs is undefined at present. The risk from dust impacts at residential properties is moderate.
Collect a minimum of six months diffusion tube data at site access to A2209, A2 or other point of access to major road network. Minimise HGV movements on the local road network during the peak hour. Standard dust control measures will minimise the effect of fugitive dust on nearby sensitive receptors.
Potential issues
Summary: This site is considered to be less suitable for use as a CSO site from an air quality perspective. There are residential properties in close proximity to the site, therefore there is potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at these properties. These impacts can be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas of already poor air quality. This can be somewhat mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
Appendix 9 Page 19
Noise Site considerations Noise band level (from Defra noise maps) Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Information from Defra noise maps Not applicable. indicates daytime noise levels of less than 58 dB L Aeq and night-time levels of less than 50 dB L Aeq at Sir Josephs Catholic Primary School and residential dwellings on Deptford High Street. These properties are likely to experience relatively low daytime and night-time noise levels as they are positioned further away from the A2209. The maps indicated daytime levels of 63 to 69 dB L Aeq and night-time noise levels of less than 55 to 60 dB L Aeq at residential properties at Congers House on Bronze Street. The residential properties facing the site are likely to experience relatively moderate daytime and night-time noise levels due to their proximity to the A2209 to the west of the site. Noise levels from the Defra noise maps provide an indication of prevailing noise levels only, and will not be employed in any detailed assessments for chosen sites. There are sensitive receptors in close proximity to the south-western boundary of the site. Sensitive receptors to the west, including the Sir Josephs Catholic School and residential properties on Deptford High Street, consist of between one and four storeys. The school is located approximately 13m from the south-western site boundary. Residential dwellings to the east of the site at Congers House, Bronze Street, consist of five-storey residential dwellings. These are located approximately 50 metres from the eastern site boundary. Not applicable.
Sensitive receptors
Appendix 9 Page 20
Noise Site considerations Comments There are a number of sensitive receptors adjacent to the site access route, including the Sir Josephs Catholic Primary School on Crossfield Street and the A2209 which could be affected by HGV traffic. Existing traffic issues Local road traffic on the A2209, coupled with more distant road traffic on the A200 to the north, will contribute to the local noise climate of the area. Not applicable. Mitigation required and conclusions
Existing sources of Local road traffic on the A2209, significant noise coupled with more distant road emissions traffic on the A200 to the north, will contribute to the local noise climate of the area. A railway lies close to properties on Bronze Street and also the Sir Josephs Catholic Primary School. Potential issues Construction: The construction period is estimated at two years and working hours will be 12 hours per day (7am to 7pm), Monday to Saturday. This has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts to the sensitive receptors surrounding the site and, in particular, at Sir Josephs Catholic Primary School, residential properties on Deptford High Street and residential dwellings at Congers House on Bronze Street. The vehicle movements have the potential to result in adverse noise impacts along the length of Crossfield Street and Coffey Street, and also along the A2209 Deptford Church Street, the A200 Creek Road, the B208 Norman Road and the A206 Greenwich High Road. The immediate site area is fairly small and, while the shaft location
Not applicable.
Adherence to the good site practices given in BS5228. Siting of noisy equipment and construction activities as far as is practicable from sensitive receptors. Provision of site boundary noise fences.
Appendix 9 Page 21
Noise Site considerations Comments may be fixed, ancillary plant should be sited as far as is practicable from surrounding sensitive receptors. Situating plant in the northern area of the site would maximise the distance between them and the nearest sensitive receptors and minimise potential disturbance. Proposed 3m site boundary fencing will provide useful noise mitigation to some plant and construction activities. Vibration resulting from general construction works is not anticipated to result in an adverse impact. The nearest residential receptors to the proposed shaft location are at a distance of approximately 50m and it is unlikely that vibration levels will result in minor cosmetic damage during shaft sinking, however vibration levels may give rise to annoyance. Vibration from tunnelling should be considered on a case-by-case basis at particular sensitive locations. Operation: With appropriate attenuation (if necessary), there is no reason why noise from the ventilation column and top chamber should result in adverse noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Summary: This site is considered to be suitable due to the distance between the site and residential properties located on Deptford High Street and at Congers House on Bronze Street. The number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and the proposed access route has the potential to result in an adverse noise impact due to the close proximity of residential receptors and Sir Josephs Catholic Primary School to the proposed haulage routes. Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 22
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Land quality Site location Current site use Topography Field evidence of contamination (ie, visual/ olfactory) Current surrounding land use (immediately adjacent to site) Grid reference: 537338, 177408 Open space Relatively flat None identified at this stage
North: St Pauls Church and residential East: Deptford Church Street, open space, residential South: St Josephs School, railway line, small industrial units (in the arches of the railway viaduct) West: St Josephs School and residential
Geological and hydrogeological information Geological strata1 Superficial geology and made ground (5m) Lambeth Group (2m) Thanet Sand (16m) Chalk
Underlying aquifer classes Groundwater vulnerability/Soil classification (High/Intermediate/Low/ Not applicable)2 Source protection zone details Surface water receptor
Secondary aquifer: River terrace deposits, Lambeth Group, Thanet Sand Principal aquifer: Chalk River terrace deposits secondary aquifer High leaching potential of soils (U)1
Located in a source protection zone (SPZ 3) defined by the Environment Agency Deptford Creek (270m east)
Relevant information within a 250m radius of the site Historical potentially contaminating activities (based on mapping data) On site The western and central region of the site comprises open space while the eastern area is occupied by unknown buildings (possibly residential), 1868-1882 Residential housing across the whole site, 1909-1972 Residential properties are no longer present, site land use comprises public open space/soft landscaping, 1976-present
Appendix 9 Page 23
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Land quality Off site Railway lines (closest 10m south), 1868-present Sack factory (32m south), 1947-1972 Pottery (35m northeast), 1909-1972 Historical building plans list asbestos (36m south), 1961 Depot (50m south), 1909-1972 Tanks contents unknown (closest located 51m south), 1952-1971 Historical building plans list gas use (53m south), 1943-1951 Electrical substation (closest located 55m southeast), 1983 Historical building plans list an above-ground fuel tank (57m south), 1958 Colour works (90m northeast), 1868-1882 Timber yard (102m northeast), 1947-1972 Deptford Station (110m southwest), 1868-present Boiler works (138m west), 1947-1972 Chemical manufacturing general (152m southeast), 1882 Oil, petroleum and gas refining and storage (156m southeast), 1898 Soap works (165m southwest), 1947-1972 Engineering works (173m west), 1947-1972 Laundry (183m southeast), 1909-1920 Warehouses (200m east), present Rag and metal warehouses (203m southeast), 19471972 Works (209m southeast), 1972-1988 Wharf (215m east), 1972-1977 Wharf asphalt and paving (215m east), 1947-1972 Road haulage (221m northeast), 1995 Soap works (225m northeast), 1868-1882 Depot (225m northeast), 1909-1920 Oil refinery (226m southeast), 1947-1972 Wharf (227m east), 1909-1920 Asphalt and paving works (236m east), 1909-1920 Depot (241m northeast), 1972-1996
Appendix 9 Page 24
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Land quality Pollution incidents to controlled waters Landfill sites Other waste sites None None One registered waste transfer site Silverchem Services, site exempt from license, very small (</=10,000 tonnes p/a), 203m southeast None None Twelve Freight forwarders, active (3m south) Boilers services, replacements and repairs, active (15m south) Garage services, active (15m south) Refrigeration equipment, active (21m south) Printers, active (42m south) Car body repairs, inactive (51m south) Carpet curtain and upholstery cleaners, inactive (56m east) Garage services, inactive (58m south) Garage services, active (58m northwest) Car breakers and dismantlers, inactive (60m south) Furniture repairing and restoration, active (68m south) Garage services, inactive (72m south)
Registered radioactive substances Fuel stations/depots Contemporary trade directory entries
Site classification based on above information Activity Potential site contaminants derived from surface sources (eg, contaminants in made ground) Potential site contaminants derived from offsite sources and transported to site 1) Some potential for made ground from potential filling operations during development 1) Railway lines Distance and direction to site 1) On site and directly adjacent to site Contaminants 1) Metals, PAHs, TPH
1) 10m south
1) Metals, PAHs, TPH 2) Metals, PAHs, TPH
2) Garage services 2) 15m south
Appendix 9 Page 25
Site suitability report C32XZ Appendix 9 Land quality Potential contamination pathways to site (Conceptual Site Model)3 Contamination category Source 1: A1, B4 Source 2: E1, F7 Category 1 assessed as low risk
Summary: The site is considered suitable as a CSO site with respect to land quality, as previous uses appear to have been limited to residential housing and soft landscaping, and the distance and nature of potentially contaminating activities in the vicinity of the site are unlikely to have resulted in significant contamination of the site. Notes: 1. From BGS Geological Model, giving average ground condition profile. Local near-surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. 2. Soil information for urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere in the country. Therefore, a worst case vulnerability (H) is assumed until proven otherwise. 3. Refer to schematic Conceptual Site Model for explanation of site-specific sourcepathway-receptors.
Appendix 9 Page 26
Contacts
For information about the Thames Tideway Tunnel Call: 0800 0721 086 Lines are open 24 hours a day Visit: www.thamestidewaytunnel.co.uk Email: info@tidewaytunnels.co.uk For our language interpretation service call 0800 0721 086
For information in Braille or large print call 0800 0721 086

For information about acceptance of our application and the examination process please contact the Planning Inspectorate. Call: 0303 444 5000 Visit: http://infrastructure.planningportal.gov.uk

Site Suitability Report C32XZ: Deptford Church Street

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Site Suitability Report C32XZ: Deptford Church Street

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Autumn 2011

Site suitability report C32XZ

110-RG-PNC-C32XZ-000608 | Autumn 2011

Site suitability report C32XZ

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Thames Tunnel Site suitability report C32XZ

Site information ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 2.2

Engineering assessment ................................................................................. 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4

Planning assessment ...................................................................................... 7 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Socio-economic and community assessment............................................. 12

Property assessment ..................................................................................... 13

Site conclusions by discipline ...................................................................... 15

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

TLRN TPA UDP UXO

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ

Introduction Purpose and structure of the report

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site information Site and surroundings

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ

Proposed use of site construction phase

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ

Proposed use of site operational phase Introduction

Restoration and after-use

Engineering assessment Access

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ

Construction works considerations

Permanent works considerations

Health and safety

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ

Planning assessment Introduction

Planning applications and permissions

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Environmental appraisal Introduction

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Built heritage and townscape

Water resources hydrogeology and surface water

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ

Socio-economic and community assessment Introduction

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ

Issues and impacts

Property assessment Introduction

Crown land and special land comments

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ

9.3.3 9.3.4 9.3.5

Property valuation comments

Site suitability report C32XZ Deptford Church Street

Site suitability report C32XZ

Disturbance compensation comments

Discretionary purchase costs comments

# * Title: # APPENDIX 3A # PLANNING & * # ENVIRONMENT PLAN * # C32XZ SITE * # * #