Site Suitability Report - S87HF (Carnwath Road Riverside) D Riverside)

Autumn 2011
Site suitability report S87HF

Carnwath Road Riverside
Please note: Further details are provided in the Final Report on Site Selection Process (doc ref: 7.05) that can be found on the Thames Tideway Tunnel section of the Planning Inspectorates web site.
110-RG-PNC-S87HF-000619 | Autumn 2011

Carnwath Road Riverside
Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside
Thames Tunnel Site suitability report S87HF

List of contents
Page number
Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 Purpose and structure of the report ......................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................. 1 Consultation............................................................................................. 2 Site and surroundings .............................................................................. 2 Type of site .............................................................................................. 4
Site information ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 2.2
3 4
Proposed use of site construction phase ................................................... 4 Proposed use of site operational phase ..................................................... 5 4.1 4.2 Introduction .............................................................................................. 5 Restoration and after-use ........................................................................ 6 Access ..................................................................................................... 6 Construction works considerations .......................................................... 7 Permanent works considerations............................................................. 8 Health and safety..................................................................................... 8 Introduction .............................................................................................. 8 Planning applications and permissions.................................................... 8 Planning context ...................................................................................... 9 Planning comments ............................................................................... 10 Introduction ............................................................................................ 12 Transport ............................................................................................... 12 Archaeology........................................................................................... 12 Built heritage and townscape................................................................. 13 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water ............................. 13 Ecology .................................................................................................. 13 Flood risk ............................................................................................... 14 Air quality ............................................................................................... 14
Engineering assessment ................................................................................. 6 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
Planning assessment ...................................................................................... 8 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4
Environmental appraisal ............................................................................... 12 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8
7.9 7.10 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7
Noise ..................................................................................................... 14 Land quality ........................................................................................... 14 Introduction ............................................................................................ 15 Socio-economic profile .......................................................................... 15 Issues and impacts ................................................................................ 15 Introduction ............................................................................................ 16 Crown land and special land comments ................................................ 17 Land to be acquired ............................................................................... 17 Property valuation comments ................................................................ 17 Disturbance compensation comments................................................... 18 Discretionary purchase costs comments ............................................... 18 Offsite statutory compensation comments ............................................. 18 Site acquisition cost assessment ........................................................... 18 Introduction ............................................................................................ 18 Engineering ........................................................................................... 18 Planning................................................................................................. 19 Environment .......................................................................................... 19 Socio-economic and community ............................................................ 20 Property ................................................................................................. 20 Next steps in the site selection process................................................. 21
Socio-economic and community assessment............................................. 15
Property assessment ..................................................................................... 16
Site conclusions by discipline ...................................................................... 18
Appendices ............................................................................................................. 23 Appendix 1 Sources of information Appendix 2 Site location plan Appendix 3 Planning and environment plans Appendix 4 Photographs of the site and surroundings Appendix 5 Transport plan Appendix 6 Services and geology plan Appendix 7 Construction phase layout Appendix 8 Operational phase layout Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables
ii
List of tables
Page number
Table 3.1 Construction phase data ............................................................................ 5 Table 4.1 Operational phase data ............................................................................. 6
List of abbreviations AOD BAP BT CPO CSO DLR EA GLA HGV LNR LPA LU m MOL ONS ORN PLA POS PTAL SAM SINC SNCI SSR SSSI SUDS TfL TD above Ordnance Datum biodiversity action plan British Telecom compulsory purchase order combined sewer overflow Docklands Light Railway Environment Agency Greater London Authority heavy goods vehicle local nature reserve local planning authority London Underground metre/metres Metropolitan Open Land Office of National Statistics Olympic Route Network Port of London Authority public open space public transport accessibility level scheduled ancient monument site of importance for nature conservation site(s) of nature conservation importance site suitability report site(s) of special scientific interest sustainable urban drainage systems Transport for London tunnel datum
iii
TLRN TPA UDP UXO
Transport for London Road Network Thames Policy Area unitary development plan unexploded ordnance
iv
1 1.1
1.1.1
Introduction Purpose and structure of the report

The Site selection methodology paper (May 2009 and revised August 2011) a outlines the process to be used to create the preferred list of main tunnel sites, and this process also applies to CSO sites. Paragraph 2.3.31 lists the type of general considerations that will be addressed in each site suitability report. Whether a consideration is relevant to the assessment of a site will depend on available information and professional judgement. This report was prepared through the assessment of information from the perspective of a number of technical disciplines: engineering, planning, environment, property and community. The reports have been prepared on the basis of the information listed in Appendix 1 and this level of information is considered to be appropriate to this stage of assessment. The Site selection background technical paper provides information on the requirements for different types of sites, their sizes and typical activities/ facilities within the sites. Each site suitability report considers a particular site on its own merits. In addition, an Engineering options report was produced, which relates to main tunnel and connection tunnel options. Information from both of these reports will feed into the technical assessment of how well the site may fit in with tunnel design options, ensuring combinations of sites spread across the length of the tunnel route provide a reasonable spatial distribution of sites (that will best assist with the construction of the tunnel, operation and maintenance). The outcomes are reported in the Phase two scheme development report.
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.2
1.2.1
Background
The process for selecting sites is set out in the Site selection methodology paper. All sites have previously passed through the following parts of Stage 1: Part 1A Creation of the long list of potential main tunnel (and CSO) sites Part 1B Creation of a short list of potential main tunnel (and CSO) sites o o o Table 2.2: Long list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites an assessment against set considerations and values Table 2.3: Draft short list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites assessment against a list of more detailed considerations Workshops to consider each site to arrive at a short list of sites.
The amendments made in August 2011 do not change the site selection methodology process. The amendments only related to the introduction of a second phase of consultation (paragraphs 2.3.13-2.4.15) and minor factual updates.
Page 1
Site suitability report S87HF 1.2.2 The final part of Stage 1 includes this report. The following is an overall summary of all elements that apply to all the sites on the final short list: Part 1C Creation of the preferred list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites site data, site visits, site suitability reports, engineering options report and optioneering workshops that are reported in the Phase two scheme development report.
1.2.3
The Site selection methodology paper also contains a provision for a back-check process in paragraph 2.5.6 that states: If any sites for any of the main tunnel sites or intermediate sites (or CSO site) are eliminated for any reason, if there are significant changes of circumstances in relation to existing sites or combinations of sites, if new or replacement sites are required or found or if the engineering design develops in unexpected ways then a targeted repeat of stages 1-3 will need to be undertaken in order to fill in any site gaps.
1.3
1.3.1
Consultation
Thames Waters approach to engagement and consultation for the Thames Tunnel project is outlined in the Statement of Community Consultation and the accompanying Community Consultation Strategy. Thames Water has engaged regularly with all potentially affected London local authorities, other stakeholders and interested parties on sites and the project. Phase one consultation has been completed for all the preferred and shortlisted sites along with the three main tunnel route options. The analysis of the consultation responses is set out in the Report on phase one consultation and Interim engagement report. Any relevant site comments were considered at the post phase one consultation optioneering workshops. The outcomes of these workshops are reported in the Phase two scheme development report. After the workshops, engagement on sites has continued with key stakeholders, and the engineering design for sites has also continued in parallel. In autumn 2011, phase two consultation will provide another opportunity for people to comment on sites.
1.3.2
2 2.1
2.1.1
Site information Site and surroundings

This section provides an overview of all the site information that will be used by one or more disciplines to assess the site in sections 3 to 9 of this report. The site S87HF is located adjacent to the River Thames within the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. The site incorporates Hurlingham Wharf, which is currently vacant and has not been used as an operational wharf for 13 years, as well as Whiffin Wharf to the west and the Carnwath Road Industrial Estate to the east, which contains a number of two-storey industrial, warehouse and retail units. Collectively, the site is referred to
2.1.2
Page 2
Site suitability report S87HF as Carnwath Road Riverside. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 2. 2.1.3 The surrounding area is characterised by a mix of land uses. Immediately to the north of the site along Carnwath Road is the Piper Building, a large mixed-use building with high-density residential properties including car parking provision on the corner with Peterborough Road. Also to the north of the site are residential properties within Philpot Square. A four-storey residential block and a PC World superstore are located immediately adjacent to the site to the east. Situated to the west of the site are threeto four-storey high residential properties overlooking the site and the River Thames. Within the wider area further to the west is the Hurlingham Club, a private members club situated within Hurlingham Park, and to the northwest is Hurlingham Business Park, which consists of large footprint industrial and commercial buildings. Further residential properties occupy the wider area to the northeast. The site is covered by various planning and environment designations in the Hammersmith and Fulham Unitary Development Plan and emerging Core Strategy, including Thames Policy Area, Sands End Conservation Area and South Fulham Riverside regeneration area. Hurlingham Wharf is also designated as a safeguarded wharf. All the mapped designations, where data was available, are shown on the planning and environment plans in Appendix 3. Photographs of the site and surroundings, together with an aerial photograph of the site, are attached as Appendix 4. Road access to the site is via the adjacent Carnwath Road. Carnwath Road has on-street parking and is subject to traffic calming. The A217 Wandsworth Bridge Road is located approximately 260m to the east. There is no rail connection to the site. Imperial Wharf Overground Station is located approximately 1.3km to the east and Putney Bridge Underground Station is located approximately 1.1km to the west. A number of preliminary transport plans for the site are attached as Appendix 5. Third-party assets and significant utilities are listed below and are shown on the services and geology plan in Appendix 6: 2.1.9 Two electrical substations are located along the northern perimeter of the site. The proposed Wimbledon to Kensal Green cable tunnel will pass centrally beneath the site in an approximate north/south direction.
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6 2.1.7
2.1.8
The locations of other third-party assets, such as BT and fibre optic communication cables, are to be confirmed by further studies and utility searches and may not be shown on the services and geology plan. Information on the geology specific to this site can be found within the services and geology plan, which is in Appendix 6. This plan shows that the shaft would be founded in London Clay.
2.1.10
Page 3
2.2
2.2.1
Type of site
The site S87HF is being considered as: a main tunnel single drive site a main tunnel reception/intermediate site.
3
3.1.1
Proposed use of site construction phase

The proposed construction phase layouts for the main tunnel sites are located in Appendix 7 Construction phase layout, and are based on a preliminary assessment. The construction phase layout drawings are illustrative and show: the layout as a main tunnel single drive site the layout as a main tunnel reception/intermediate site potential access point.
3.1.2
3.1.3
These drawings provide initial preliminary schematic layouts that have not been optimised. If the site proceeds to the next stage as a preferred site, construction phase layouts would be optimised to minimise impacts. Drawings of typical activities associated with the shaft construction phase are provided in Appendix 7. Potential above-ground construction features (dependent on shaft type) include: approximately 3m high hoarding around the site boundary welfare facilities, double/triple stacked temporary structures, approximately 8m high grout plant, approximately 3m to 5m high, including silos stock and workyard facilities, double stacked, approximately 6m high mobile crane, approximately 30m high gantry crane, approximately 8m high.
3.1.4
3.1.5
Preliminary data associated with the construction phase are provided in Table 3.1.
Page 4
Site suitability report S87HF Table 3.1 Construction phase data Activity Length of construction period Likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) Working days Primary means of transporting excavated material away from site Primary means of transporting materials to site Main tunnel drive site Approx 6 years 24 hours Mon to Sun River Road/River Reception/ Intermediate site 4 to 5 years 12 hrs from 7am to 7pm Mon to Sat Road* Road*
* There may be feasible opportunities to use barge transport if used as a reception/ intermediate site.
4 4.1
4.1.1
Proposed use of site operational phase Introduction

The indicative operational phase layouts for the main tunnel sites are located in Appendix 8 Operational phase layout, and are based on a preliminary assessment. The generic elevations of structures shown on the operational phase layout are located in Appendix 8 and provide an illustration of typical examples of the permanent structures which are applicable to main tunnel sites. The underground infrastructure at this site would be likely to comprise a shaft. Above-ground infrastructure at this site would be likely to comprise a ventilation column and ventilation building. Hydraulically, the top structure to the shaft would be finished to a minimum level of 104.5m tunnel datum (TD) (4.5mAOD). Since the mean ground level in the area of the shaft is 105.5mTD (5.5mAOD), top structures to the shaft would be finished at existing ground level. The top structure is to provide access and egress into the shaft. For further information on the generic layout of this top structure, refer to Appendix 8. Hardstanding would be provided to the top structures. The site would be fenced. Preliminary data associated with the operational phase are provided in Table 4.1.
4.1.2
4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5
4.1.6 4.1.7
Page 5
Site suitability report S87HF Table 4.1 Operational phase data Level of inspections and maintenance and likely working hours, ie, (night/day/ weekend) frequency of visits No. of traffic movements One daytime visit every six months for electrical/instrument inspection. An additional one-week maintenance period for tunnel/shaft inspection required per ten years that could be night/day/weekend working. One van visit every six months. An additional one-week period of two to ten movements per day (estimated several vans and two cranes) every ten years.
4.2
4.2.1
Restoration and after-use

The portion of the site not occupied by the permanent works would be restored to its original condition on completion of the construction works. If any buildings were demolished, these would not be reinstated unless required.
5 5.1
5.1.1
Engineering assessment Access

This section should be read in conjunction with Section 7.2.
Road
5.1.2 Direct road access to the site would be achieved from the adjacent Carnwath Road. This carriageway is approximately 7m wide and has areas of on-street parking. Traffic calming comprising speed cushions and kerb realignments are in place along the carriageway.
Rail
5.1.3 There would be no rail network to the site. Imperial Wharf Overground Station would be located approximately 1.3km to the east and Putney Bridge District Line Station would be located approximately 1.1km to the west.
River
5.1.4 5.1.5 5.1.6 The site would have direct access to the river. The site would have existing wharf facilities and the western, cleared section of the site currently has safeguarded wharf status. Information received from the Port of London Authority (PLA) indicates that the site may be served by 800 tonne barges. The site may support the use of larger motorised barges, although this would need confirmation. The site would be located directly opposite the Western Riverside Waste Authority within the London Borough of Wandsworth. This facility transfers
5.1.7
Page 6
Site suitability report S87HF domestic waste onto barges for removal by river. The general impact on navigation at this location would require assessment. It would be necessary for this to be examined in detail in the form of a specific risk assessment (including modelling of barge movements), which would require discussions with and approval of the PLA. 5.1.8 Material movements for a reception/intermediate site would likely be by road. As the site is adjacent to the river with wharf facilities, there could be a feasible opportunity to use barge transport.
5.2
5.2.1
Construction works considerations

The site size of 16,000m2 would be a little constrained and consequently double stacking of welfare, office and stockyard facilities would be required. The current use of the site is split between cleared land to the west and a number of light industrial units located to the east. Demolition of the industrial units would be required. The proposed Wimbledon to Kensal Green cable tunnel would pass centrally beneath the site in an approximate northsouth direction. To maximise the clearance between the cable tunnel and the connection tunnel to Acton, the main shaft would need to be located towards the west of the site. Wandsworth Bridge would be located approximately 150m to the east of the site. To minimise settlement and allow the main tunnel to pass mid-span beneath the bridge, the shaft would need to be located towards to the west of the site. A shaft located towards the east of the site would not facilitate a suitable radius of tunnel alignment to allow the tunnel to pass mid-span beneath the bridge. The site would have direct river access and a timber-fendered wharf exists along the entire frontage of the site to facilitate barge mooring. To enable loading and unloading, it is probable that a campshed platform would need to be constructed on the river foreshore to enable the location of barges during low tide conditions. The existing river wall appears to be constructed from sheet piles. It is possible that these piles have ground anchors which extend beneath the wharf. These anchors may require modification to enable the construction of the shaft. A former pier was located on the foreshore adjacent to the site, the foundations of which may require removal during any campshed construction. Historic drawings indicate the site was formerly used as a cement works. Consequently, contaminated land may be present, although this is anticipated to be manageable during the construction process. Two electrical substations are located within the site, adjacent to the northern perimeter. They would require protecting or relocation as part of the construction enabling works.
5.2.2
5.2.3
5.2.4
5.2.5
5.2.6
5.2.7
5.2.8
5.2.9
Page 7
Site suitability report S87HF 5.2.10 5.2.11 The Thames Path would need to be diverted inland for the duration of the works. It is likely that the proposed works can be constructed within the overall construction programme.
5.3
5.3.1
Permanent works considerations

The position of the shaft and associated structures would be located towards the west of the site. This location would have the least impact on the cable tunnel and the Wandsworth Bridge, but would locate the permanent works on a disused wharf with a safeguarded designation. Top structures would be finished at existing ground level.
5.3.2
5.4
5.4.1 5.4.2
Health and safety

The site is located directly adjacent to the river. Consideration must be given to working near the water and the loading/unloading of materials. There are no other unusual health and safety issues with this site.
6 6.1
6.1.1
Planning assessment Introduction

The planning assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Planning applications and permissions Planning context Planning comments.
6.2
6.2.1
Planning applications and permissions

An initial desktop search of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (LBHF) online planning applications database identified a number of planning applications submitted within the last five years applicable to the site. Planning permissions of note include the use of Hurlingham Wharf for vehicle storage, granted on 15 September 2005 (ref 2002/01940/FUL). The planning permission expired on 15 September 2010 and the online status shows the application has lapsed. Planning permission was granted for use of warehouse storage at 31 Carnwath Road in association with the existing storage and distribution depot at 29 Carnwath Road on 1 December 2005 (ref 2005/02443/FUL). More recently, an application was submitted on 5 August 2011 for the erection of a temporary building for five years to enclose waste recycling operations, and a change of use from building materials storage facility to building materials recycling facility on Whiffin Wharf (ref 2011/02401/FUL). This application was withdrawn soon after at the request of the applicant.
Page 8
6.3
6.3.1
Planning context
The current planning policy context for the site is provided from the saved September 2007 policies from the Hammersmith and Fulham Unitary Development Plan, adopted August 2003. Several planning designations and policies from this development plan are applicable to the site and are detailed below. Policies are also presented from the emerging Core Strategy, which is expected to be formally adopted by the council in October 2011. Due to the advanced stage of the LDF documents, we consider the policies within the emerging development plan documents to be of material weight. In terms of regional policy, reference is made to the adopted London Plan (July 2011).
Thames Policy Area

6.3.2 UDP Policy EN31X requires all built development to be of a high-quality design that respects the riverside location, is of a high urban design standard and contributes to its surrounding environment.
Safeguarded wharves
6.3.3 Hurlingham Wharf is designated as a safeguarded wharf. UDP Policy TN31 safeguards these sites against development that could preclude their future use for the transhipment of freight and associated uses. Use of the site should also be consistent with policy proposals to transfer freight traffic from road to water transport, including the provision of wharves or piers to facilitate such transport. In contrast, the emerging Core Strategy Policy RTC1 supports the withdrawal of the safeguarding of vacant wharves to allow for more flexibility in the use of vacant land. However, this emerging policy is contradictory to regional guidance, with the London Plan (Policy 7.26) supporting the protection of safeguarded wharves for waterborne freight transport. The London Plan encourages appropriate temporary uses of vacant safeguarded wharves, which should not preclude the wharf being reused for cargo-handling uses. The London Plan also states that development close to navigable waterways should maximise water transport for bulk materials, particularly during demolition and construction phases.
Conservation area
6.3.4 The site is located within the Sands End Conservation Area. UDP Policy EN2 requires all development to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area, paying particular attention to the historical context, quality of design, scale, bulk, massing and materials.
South Fulham Riverside

6.3.5 The emerging Core Strategy identifies the wider area in which the site is located as the South Fulham Riverside Regeneration Area, which has an indicative allocation for 2,200 additional homes and 300 to 500 new jobs. Strategic Policy SFR requires an especially high standard of urban design within the riverside areas, together with linkages to the river and continuation of the Thames Path riverside walk. The supporting text
Page 9
Site suitability report S87HF explains how the area was formerly designated as an employment zone in the UDP until 2007; however, there is now an overriding need for new homes and much of the area is not accessible enough for significant new employment. 6.3.6 The South Fulham Riverside SPD (April 2011) first draft was issued for informal public consultation Friday 8 April to Friday 20 May 2011. The SPD provides guidance on how the area should be regenerated and developed over the next 20 years and, when adopted by the LBHF, will be taken into account when determining planning applications within the applicable area. Thames Water submitted comments in relation to water management issues, the Thames Tunnel project and approach to safeguarded wharves within South Fulham Riverside. Those comments made specific reference to the potential use of the Carnwath Road Riverside sites as a main tunnel drive site, and the inclusion of Hurlingham Wharf within the construction area and its use in accordance with the wharf safeguarding. The comments concluded that based on the significance of strategic policy support, the Thames Tunnel project should have primacy over aspirational residential-led development that could affect sites identified for its construction and operation.
Nature conservation areas

6.3.7 The River Thames is designated within the UDP as a nature conservation area, where development must ensure the protection and enhancement of these areas (Policy EN27). The emerging Core Strategy Policy RTC1 encourages the improvement of waterside environments, including the development of vacant and underused land, protection of existing water dependent uses and ensuring high standards of design. The council seeks to protect the river as an ecological resource and as an important refuge for plants and wildlife.
6.4
6.4.1
Planning comments
The site consists of Hurlingham Wharf, a currently vacant safeguarded wharf, as well as Whiffin Wharf and a number of industrial, warehouse and retail units within Carnwath Road Industrial Estate. Use of the Hurlingham Wharf site for either a main tunnel drive site or a reception/intermediate site would be consistent with extant local development plan policies, as well as adopted regional policies, which support waterborne freight transport and the appropriate uses of safeguarded wharves. Proposals for campsheds for the main tunnel drive site, which would allow barges to transport construction materials, are also consistent with the London Plan policy for maximising water transport for such purposes. The temporary use of Hurlingham Wharf during the construction phase of the Thames Tunnel project would not preclude the wharf being reused for cargo-handling uses and would therefore accord with regional policy. Although the intermediate/reception site does not currently propose use of the river for transport, Hurlingham Wharf could be used for this purpose during the construction phase and should be investigated further. The location of the shaft and layout of permanent facilities for either the main tunnel drive site or intermediate/reception site will need consideration so
Page 10
Site suitability report S87HF as not to prejudice the sites ability to function as a wharf in the future. The emerging Core Strategy departs from this protection and supports the withdrawal of the safeguarding of Hurlingham Wharf to allow for more flexibility of uses. However, this policy is contradictory to the London Plan designation, and removal of the safeguarding would require formal withdrawal by the London Mayor. 6.4.2 The Thames Policy Area is unlikely to be significantly impacted on since the construction works and remaining top structures should not result in overly prominent development in this location, and should not unacceptably obstruct local views. The proposal is also unlikely to have an unacceptable impact on the character or appearance of the Sands End Conservation Area, on the basis that the existing site character and context do not positively contribute to the appearance of the designated area and the sites could be improved in appearance as part of the project. However, appropriate consideration will still need to be given to the design and location of permanent structures in order to minimise potential adverse impacts, including quality of design, scale, bulk, massing and materials. A more detailed heritage assessment is included in Section 7. The site is designated within the wider South Fulham Riverside regeneration area, which has ambitious housing and job targets. The temporary use of the site is not expected to cause detriment to the delivery of these regeneration aims, and consideration of the shaft location and permanent structures, in close discussion with the council and landowners, will be necessary. There are currently no extant applications to redevelop this site. The emerging Core Strategy Policy SFR and South Fulham Riverside draft SPD expect redevelopment to continue the Thames Path riverside walk once development on these sites has been completed. Thames Tunnel project proposals to use the site include the diversion of the Thames Path inland temporarily during the construction period and reinstatement will need to be ensured. Under the main drive site option, campsheds are proposed to extend into the River Thames, which is designated as a mature conservation area. Mitigation measures will need to be implemented to ensure the quality of the waterside environment is not damaged as a result. However, the overall Thames Tunnel project will result in wider improvements to the ecological resource of the river, in line with emerging Core Strategy Policy RTC1. A four-storey residential block and a PC World superstore are located immediately adjacent to the site to the east. Situated to the west of the site are three- to four-storey high residential properties overlooking the site and the River Thames. The proximity of these residential properties immediately adjacent to the west and east of the site is of most concern, particularly the properties to the west, which have habitable room windows rather than blank facades orientated towards the site. Mitigation will be required to avoid potential adverse construction impacts, such as noise, dust, light and traffic movements. Control of construction working hours may also be required to safeguard amenity.
6.4.3
6.4.4
6.4.5
6.4.6
Page 11
Site suitability report S87HF 6.4.7 Immediately to the north of the site along Carnwath Road is the Piper Building, a large mixed-use building with high-density residential properties including car parking provision, on the corner with Peterborough Road. Also to the north of the site are residential properties within Philpot Square. The configuration of the Piper Building is designed as an L-shape, which places residential dwellings to the north side of the building and commercial units to the south. This arrangement, with a blank facade fronting Carnwath Road, provides some protection to the residential units behind from construction impacts, such as noise, dust and lighting. Combined with the position of Carnwath Road, the separation distance to the residential properties to the north of the site is considered to be sufficient to safeguard residential amenity if combined with appropriate mitigation measures.
7 7.1
7.1.1
Environmental appraisal Introduction

The following sections summarise specialist assessments which are provided in Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables.
7.2
7.2.1
Transport
The site is considered to be suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site as potential road and rail access routes are suitable for HGVs. In the case of the main tunnel single drive option, the site has good access to the river, and material import and export is proposed using campsheds that will require construction. For both site options, the route to rail would pass through a high street area. To enable site access, some on-street parking bays on Carnwath Road may require removal if found to affect the turning movements of construction vehicles accessing the site (alternative parking may be available nearby). The potential for the workforce to access the site by public transport is low, however parking for the workforce could potentially be allocated within the site boundary, or workforce transport may need to be provided. The Thames Path will require diversion around the site.
7.2.2
7.2.3
7.3
7.3.1
Archaeology
Based on current information, the site is considered less suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site as there are records of archaeological receptors of medium value, including alluvial deposits, within the western part of the site. It is reasonable to anticipate that further archaeological receptors of high or medium value may be present elsewhere within the site and that these may include waterlogged deposits. Further desk-based assessment is required to assess in detail the risk posed by archaeological receptors within this site.
Page 12
7.4
7.4.1
Built heritage and townscape

The site is considered suitable from the perspective of built heritage as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site, as impacts on built heritage receptors are likely to be limited to the Sands End Conservation Area and the site is less likely to result in severe adverse impacts on built heritage receptors. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality design (with screening where appropriate) is likely to be required to ensure that the Sands End Conservation Area is preserved or enhanced. This site is considered suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site from the perspective of townscape, since its character is industrial in nature and although during construction the presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings on site would impact the character of the site, the demolition of existing buildings and appropriate mitigation to integrate the permanent elements could potentially enhance the character of the river frontage and surrounding streetscape.
7.4.2
7.5
7.5.1
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water

In terms of hydrogeology, this site is considered suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site because the shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (unproductive strata). The Chalk piezometric head is likely to be approximately 14m above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected. The superficial deposits at the site comprise alluvium, which is classified as a secondary aquifer at the shaft site. There is the potential for a limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer due to sheet piling. In terms of surface water resources, this site is considered to be less suitable as a main tunnel single drive site because there is a direct pathway for pollution to the River Thames, as well as an indirect route through site drainage. Specific mitigation would be required to manage loading and unloading of barges on the campsheds. In the case of the main tunnel reception/intermediate site, it is considered suitable as there is no direct pathway for pollution to the River Thames.
7.5.2
7.5.3
7.6
7.6.1
Ecology
The site is considered suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site, as impacts to ecological receptors are likely to be limited. There is some potential for buildings on the site to support roosting bats or nesting birds, and should roosts or breeding birds be identified then mitigation, possibly including offsite provision and mitigating work practices, would be required. There is a small area of wasteland habitat present on site, which could potentially support uncommon or notable invertebrates, plant species and reptiles; and, should this be the case, there may be a need for mitigation, which could include a limited amount of offsite provision.
Page 13
Site suitability report S87HF 7.6.2 However, for the main tunnel single drive site, the construction of campsheds in the Thames is likely to require negotiation with the EA and may require compensatory habitat provision and post-works restoration which could result in the site being less suitable. Great care will be required to ensure that there will be no entry/leaching of spoil into the River Thames during loading and unloading of barges on the campsheds.
7.7
7.7.1
Flood risk
This site is considered less suitable as a main tunnel single drive site because it is located partially within the river channel and, as such, is within Flood Zone 3b functional flood plain. The site is located across flood defences and would require flood defence consent before work could commence. There is potentially space for attenuation SUDS to be accommodated on site, but further investigation is required to determine if the site is suitable for infiltration SUDS. This site is considered suitable as a main tunnel reception/intermediate site as there are no campsheds associated with this option and the site is not located across flood defences.
7.7.2
7.8
7.8.1
Air quality
This site is considered less suitable for use as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site from an air quality perspective. There are residential properties in close proximity to the site, therefore there is potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at these properties. These impacts could be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas of already poor air quality. This could be somewhat mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
7.9
7.9.1
Noise
The site is considered less suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site due to the relatively short separation distances between the site and the closest sensitive receptors. The number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and their access route has the potential to cause disturbance to properties lining those streets. Due to the short distance of the shaft location and the nearest sensitive properties, vibration levels during construction may give rise to complaints.
7.10
7.10.1
Land quality
The site is considered less suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site based on the moderate potential for contamination of the site to have occurred, specifically from wharf operations, tanks, electrical substations, garage services, printers and industrial buildings located on site and, to a lesser extent, tanks and a concrete works located in the near vicinity of the site.
Page 14
Site suitability report S87HF 7.10.2 The potential sources outlined above may impact on site workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact/vapour inhalation exposure pathways. There is also the potential for surface water (the River Thames) to be impacted.
8 8.1
8.1.1
Socio-economic and community assessment Introduction

The socio-economic and community assessment builds on the advantages and disadvantages reported in Table 2.3 and covers the following areas: Socio-economic profile Socio-economic and community issues and impacts.
8.2
8.2.1
Socio-economic profile
The site is within the Sands End ward of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census show the following indicators for the ward, in comparison to the rest of the borough, London and England: The proportion of 16- to 74-year olds in full-time employment is, at 45 per cent, greater than for London and England as a whole but broadly the same as the rest of the borough. The proportion of residents in the ward classified as AB and C1 social grade is greater than for London and England as a whole but broadly the same as the rest of the borough. In terms of the ethnic mix, almost 80 per cent of the people in the ward describe their ethnicity as white, which is greater than the proportion in the borough as a whole. Conversely, the proportion of people of Asian and black origin is slightly lower than for the borough as a whole. The percentage of people living in social rented housing is, at 25 per cent, higher than for the rest of the borough, London and England as a whole.
8.2.2
This data indicates that, in many ways, the ward is typical of the borough, with the number of economically active people in the ward also similar to the borough as a whole. The figures suggest there may be a relatively high proportion of social housing in the vicinity of the site.
8.3
8.3.1
Issues and impacts

The proposed location of the works for a main tunnel site suggests that the main impacts from a community perspective appear likely to be on owners and employees of a number of industrial, warehouse and retail units, located in Carnwath Road Industrial Estate on the eastern section of the site. Use of the site is likely to lead to the loss or temporary relocation of these businesses, which may impact on these businesses, their owners, employees, members of the local community and the local economy. For
Page 15
Site suitability report S87HF the main tunnel reception/intermediate site option, it appears unlikely that any business would need to be relocated. 8.3.2 For both the main tunnel and main tunnel reception/intermediate site options, the residential properties and play area located immediately to the west of the site are also likely to be directly impacted due to their close proximity to the proposed shaft location. While it may be possible to partially screen this area from the works by locating the office and welfare facilities on this boundary of the site, the proximity to the shaft itself means it appears likely these properties may be affected by construction-related noise, dust and vibration. However, this depends on the type of mitigation used to address these issues. The residential properties to the east of the site appear also likely to be affected by the proposed works, particularly in relation to the main tunnel site option as these properties are directly adjacent to the site boundary. Mitigation will be required to reduce construction-related impacts. Residents and businesses operating out of the mixed-use Piper Centre and the two large residential apartment blocks which make up the south and western edges of Philpot Square, which are all opposite the site to the north, are also likely to be directly affected by either of the site use options. A number of properties in these buildings will overlook the entire worksite and are situated in relative close proximity to the main shaft works area. Further consideration should be given to the site layout in order to minimise local impacts. Use of this site for the main tunnel works option would require a further diversion of the Thames Path during construction, but it appears this stretch is not well used, so impact on local residents and other users would be small. The Currys store which neighbours the site to the east appears unlikely to be greatly impacted as it is at a distance from the main works area. For the main tunnel site option, the majority of construction materials will be transported to and from the site via river; however, some materials and personnel will still have to access the site by road, which may increase congestion in the area and impact on local residents. For the main tunnel reception/intermediate site option, road will be the primary method of transporting materials, so this is therefore likely to have the greater impact on the local highway network. It does not appear likely that there will be any long-term operational impacts of the proposed works as the site has been identified for redevelopment.
8.3.3
8.3.4
8.3.5
8.3.6 8.3.7
8.3.8
9 9.1
9.1.1
Property assessment Introduction

This report builds on the advantages and disadvantages in Table 2.3 and the assessment provides more up-to-date information.
Page 16
9.2
9.2.1
Crown land and special land comments

The freehold of part of this site is held by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. The site is, therefore, likely to be subject to certification process by the Secretary of State Ministerial Procedure. Prior to selecting the site, the responsible authority must be consulted so that it can be established whether there are any fundamental issues arising that might prejudice the practicability of using the land. With co-operation of the borough council, there should be no risk to the project. However, with justifiable objections to the selection of this site, the borough may prevent it from being used for this purpose. Risk to the project then becomes significant, with no measurable timescale for addressing and overcoming the objections. If the land does comprise land awarded additional protection under Section 127 of the Planning Act 2008, the land may not be acquired unless the Secretary of State certifies that there will be no serious detriment to the carrying on of the undertaking, or that the land can be replaced. On account of the area held by the council being required temporarily, we do not anticipate difficulties with the special procedure and there should be no consequential delay to the programme. Contact should be made with the owner as soon as possible to establish if an acquisition can be agreed.
9.2.2
9.2.3
9.3
9.3.1
Land to be acquired
The site is made up of property known as Hurlingham Wharf, Wiffin Wharf and Carnwath Road Industrial Estate. Hurlingham and Wiffin Wharf are vacant sites and are held by a residential developer. The Carnwath Road Industrial Estate freehold is held by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham and subject to a long lease in favour of a private investor. The estate is fully let and occupied by a number of businesses who each enjoy leasehold interests of varying lengths.
9.3.2
9.4
9.4.1 9.4.2
Property valuation comments

The units at Carnwath Road Industrial Estate are all let and will provide a significant investment income to the long leaseholder. Hurlingham and Wiffin Wharf are held by a residential developer. However, no planning application has, to date, been submitted to redevelop the site for residential use. Hurlingham Wharf has protected wharf status, which would need to be lifted before such development takes place. The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham has identified the site as an area for regeneration. Owing to this aspiration and the fact this site benefits from river frontage, hope value indicative of residential development is likely to exist.
9.4.3
Page 17
9.5
9.5.1 9.5.2
Disturbance compensation comments

Hurlingham and Whiffin Wharf are vacant and so any disturbance costs here are likely to be minimal. As identified, the Carnwath Road Industrial Estate is fully let and it will be necessary to meet compensation costs for relocation or even business extinguishment.
9.6
9.6.1
Discretionary purchase costs comments

For part of the construction period, onsite working of 24 hours a day, seven days a week is proposed. The site adjoins residential properties to the western boundary and there are a number of residential developments to the north of Carnwath Road. There is, therefore, a risk of significant discretionary purchase costs.
9.7
9.7.1
Offsite statutory compensation comments

There is limited potential for claims under Part 1 of the Land Compensation Act 1973, as the completed works are unlikely to result in diminution in value to property. Provided access is maintained to adjacent properties during the construction phase, there should be limited potential for claims under Section 10 of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965.
9.7.2
9.8
9.8.1
Site acquisition cost assessment

It is envisaged that the site acquisition costs will be significant.
10 10.1
10.1.1
Site conclusions by discipline Introduction

The conclusions presented in this section are drawn from each disciplines assessment, and are designed to inform the workshop where a final conclusion is reached on whether the site can be taken forward as a potential preferred site, subject to its fit with possible drive strategies in the case of main tunnel sites.
10.2
10.2.1 10.2.2
Engineering
This site is considered to be suitable as a main tunnel drive site and a main tunnel reception/intermediate site. For a main tunnel drive site, the site would have good river access as it already has wharf facilities. The sites river frontage would allow delivery of materials to site, together with removal of excavated material by river. For a main tunnel drive site, the site size would be a little constrained but manageable. There would be a good access opportunity available to the TLRN. The site would be level and predominately clear, with minimal enabling works required for the demolition of the light industrial units.
10.2.3 10.2.4 10.2.5
Page 18
Site suitability report S87HF 10.2.6 The two electrical substations located along the northern boundary would need to be protected or relocated as part of the works.
10.3
10.3.1 10.3.2
Planning
This site is considered to be suitable as a reception/intermediate site and a main tunnel drive site. Hurlingham Wharf is designated as a safeguarded wharf and is currently vacant. Temporary use of this site, including its use for the waterborne transport of construction materials (for the main drive site), is consistent with extant local policy and regional planning guidance. The Carnwath Road Riverside sites are subject of a number of planning policy designations, and the shaft location and layout of the permanent structures will need particular consideration, especially with regards to the wider conservation area and regeneration area. However, none of these designations are deemed significant to preclude the use of the site to deliver the Thames Tunnel project. The existing site character and context do not positively contribute to the appearance of the area and, once the temporary works are completed, the site could be redeveloped for alternative uses, as proposed in the draft South Fulham Riverside SPD. Of most concern is the potential adverse impact on residential amenity, particularly to the adjacent residential properties to the west and east. Residential properties within the Piper Building may also be impacted by the construction activities. Appropriate mitigation measures, as described in Section 10.4, will need to be adopted.
10.3.3
10.4
10.4.1
Environment
Overall, the site is considered to be suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site. However, mitigation would be required to enable the site to be used. Based on current information, the site is considered suitable from the perspective of transport, built heritage, townscape, water resources (hydrogeology) and ecology. In the case of the reception/intermediate option, it is also suitable from the perspective of water resources (surface water) and flood risk. The site is considered less suitable from the perspective of archaeology, air quality, noise and land quality. In the case of the single drive option, it is also less suitable from the perspective of water resources (surface water) and flood risk. Overall, the site is considered suitable, subject to further investigation of whether archaeology, air quality, noise and land quality impacts and, in the case of the single drive option, surface water and flood risk impacts, can be adequately mitigated. Likely mitigation considerations would include: archaeology further detailed archaeological assessment to assess risks associated with development impacts and to identify likely mitigation requirements
10.4.2
10.4.3
10.4.4
Page 19
Site suitability report S87HF air quality measures to ensure dust is adequately mitigated for the closest receptors noise standard noise barriers and other techniques may be required to reduce construction noise to acceptable levels land quality any required remediation of contamination (at this moderate risk site) and/or measures to ensure no mobilisation of contaminants retained in situ surface water and flood risk in the case of the single drive option, measures to protect the site from flooding and to avoid potential for pollution of the River Thames.
10.5
10.5.1 10.5.2
Socio-economic and community

On balance, this site is considered less suitable for use as either a main tunnel or main tunnel reception/intermediate site. For the main tunnel site option, this assessment is based on the potentially adverse impact on the businesses operating out of premises located on the eastern section of the site, and the residential properties located to the west, north and east of the site and surrounding vicinity. While appropriate mitigation measures may help reduce construction impacts caused by noise, dust, vibration and traffic movements, they are unlikely to prevent a certain amount of disruption, especially given the proposed location of the main shaft. Further consideration should be given to the detailed layout of the site to reduce local impact. Use of the river to transport materials should be maximised to help reduce traffic-related impacts. In relation to the main tunnel reception/intermediate site option, while it appears unlikely that any businesses would require relocation, the works appear likely to still impact on neighbouring residential and business properties. As the scope of works is significantly less than is required for a main tunnel site, it may be possible to more effectively mitigate for any potential impacts of the onsite construction works on the surrounding residential properties. However, as the river is not being used for the transport of construction materials in this option, site traffic may have more impact on the surrounding community, but there will be much less material to handle and there is still potential to use the river.
10.5.3
10.6
10.6.1 10.6.2 10.6.3
Property
This site is less suitable for both a main and intermediate option. The advantages of the site are as follows: Part of the site is currently vacant. Acquisition costs Relocation or extinguishment of businesses in Carnwath Road Industrial Estate. The disadvantages of the site are as follows:
Page 20
10.7
10.7.1
Next steps in the site selection process

It should be noted at this point that the above conclusions do not represent an overall recommendation on the suitability of a site. The disciplines discuss their site suitability report conclusions at optioneering workshops, along with main tunnel drive strategy options. Main tunnel sites need to link together to form possible drive options for construction of the main tunnel. Therefore, a preferred site can only be identified through a series of main tunnel drive option comparisons. The outcome of this two-step process (sites and then drive option comparisons) is set out in the Phase two scheme development report.
Page 21
Page 22
Site suitability report S87HF Appendices
Appendices
Page 23
Site suitability report S87HF Appendices
Page 24
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 1
Appendix 1 Sources of information Engineering

Traffic Management and Access Roads/Rail URS Scott Wilson Access River BMT Isis Services (Utilities) and Third Party Assets Thames Tunnel and utility companies Geology British Geological Society and Thames Tunnel Construction and Operational Layout Template Thames Tunnel Site selection background technical paper Thames Tunnel
Planning
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham online planning applications database Saved policies in the Hammersmith and Fulham Unitary Development Plan, adopted in August 2003, saved September 2007 Emerging Hammersmith and Fulham Core Strategy, Post submission amendments arising during examination, published May 2011 London Plan, July 2011
Environment
Transport Map of Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) www.tfl.gov.uk Bus Route Maps: North-east, north-west, south-west, south-east www.tfl.gov.uk Crossrail Plans www.crossrail.co.uk/crossrail-bill-documents PTAL scores Obtained from Table 2.3 information Thames Path map www.walklondon.org.uk Capital Ring www.walklondon.org.uk Cycle Routes www.sustrans.org.uk and Local Cycling Guides 1-14 Design Manual for Roads and Bridge TD 42/95, Highways Agency
Archaeology Historic Environment data from Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service (GLAAS) National Monuments Record for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens
Appendix 1 Page 1
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 1 London Archaeological Archive and Research Centre (LAARC) Local authority websites Bing maps
Built heritage and townscape Local authority lists of Locally Listed Buildings National Monuments Record for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens Unitary development plan and DPDs Local authority websites Bing maps
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Local authority details of unlicensed abstractors Environment Agency abstraction licence details Environment Agency groundwater levels and contour maps (2009-11) Environment Agency water quality (surface water and groundwater) Environment Agency Groundwater Source Protection Zones Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck British Geological Survey (BGS) logs BGS 1:50,000 Geological Sheets Solid and Drift Editions (England and Wales) BGS Geology of London Special Memoir for 1:50,000 Geological sheets 256 (North London), 257 (Romford), 270 (South London) and 271 (Dartford) (England and Wales) Crossrail (2005) Assessment of Water Impacts Technical Report: Appendix C Baseline Data. Figure C.4: Extent of Saline Intrusion based on 177 mg/l *5mmol/l) Isochlor
Ecology Thames Estuary Partnership (2002) Tidal Thames Habitat Action Plan London Biodiversity Action Plan www.lbp.org.uk Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) www.magic.gov.uk - statutory designated sites London Wildweb wildweb.london.gov.uk - non-statutory site of importance for nature conservation Black redstart distribution in London www.blackredstarts.org.uk/ pages/.html
Appendix 1 Page 2
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 1 National Biodiversity Network http://searchnbn.net - distribution of protected species Google Maps aerial views of habitat features BAP habitats www.natureonthemap.org.uk Priority habitats and species on national and local scales www.ukbap.org.uk
Flood risk Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Environment Agency National Flood and Coastal Defence Database Envirocheck
Air quality Local authority websites London Air Quality Network www.londonair.org.uk Defra UK-AIR, air quality information resource www.airquality.co.uk Defra Air Quality Management Areas http://aqma.defra.gov.uk Defra Local Air Quality Management http://laqm.defra.gov.uk
Noise Envirocheck Identification of receptors Promap Calculation of distances between site and receptors Multimap Aerial photography www.multimap.co.uk Defra noise maps Identification of existing noise levels
Land quality Google Maps/Earth Site walkover information Envirocheck Data Sheets provided as a GIS Database British Geological Survey (BGS) logs
Socio-economic and community

Statistics from the Office of National Statistics 2001 Census data London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, Sands End ward profile: www.lbhf.gov.uk/Images/Ward%20Profile%202010%20%20Sands%20End_tcm21-73252.pdf
Appendix 1 Page 3
Property
Mouchel Land Registry information Valuation Office Agency (VOA) website Multimap
Appendix 1 Page 4
Appendix 2 Site location plan
Appendix 2 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
&
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed Shaft Site
S87HF
0 25 50 100 Metres 150 200
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345
WANDSWORTH
CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02027 Date : .................................. 2011/10/27 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
Thames Water Utilities
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the proposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme.
APPENDIX 2 SITE LOCATION PLAN S87HF SITE
Appendix 3 Planning and environment plans
Appendix 3 Page 1
TI AL
Legend
BRE S ER
EN
Thames Policy Area River Walks Safeguarded Wharves
FI D
ON UG
RO
AD
ET T RE
NM W TO
D EA
RO
AD
Area of Main Map
C MO DY
&
Legend
TE PE
TR KS
AF
OR RB
T EE
OU
R AN LIV SU
D OA
GH RO AD
ND WA SW T OR H BR G ID ER D OA
CARNWATH ROAD
15
30
60
90
120
S87HF
Metres
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02091 Date : .................................. 2011/06/29 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
WANDSWORTH
Title:
APPENDIX 3A PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT PLAN S87HF SITE
TI AL
Legend
Green Corridor/Chains District Park Deficiency
! ! ! ! ! !
! !
E BRE
EN
RS
FI D
ON UG
D OA
TRE ET
Sites of Metropolitan Nature Conservation Importance
Sites of Local AD Nature Conservation Importance RO D EA Area Nature Conservation NM W TO Deficiency Area 2008 Open Spaces
Area of Main Map
C MO DY
&
AF T
Flood Risk Zone 3 Flood Risk Zone 2
Legend
TE PE OR RB
TR KS T EE
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed Shaft Site CSO (Directly Controlled)
OU
SU
RO AN LIV
AD
( !
ND WA SW
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! of this map after alteration, amendment or ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02061 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Date : .................................. 2011/06/15 Projection : .......................... British National Grid ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the proposed Tunnel. site! on ! this ! draft to mean site! will! be ! selected a construction site to form the! Thames ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Thames ! ! ! ! !Inclusion ! ! of ! a! ! plan ! should ! ! not ! be ! taken ! ! ! ! that ! such ! ! ! ! as ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !part ! of! ! ! Tunnel ! ! scheme. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
GH AD RO
T OR H G ID BR E AD RO
CARNWATH ROAD
15
30
60 Metres
90
120
S87HF
WANDSWORTH ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Title:
APPENDIX 3B PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT PLAN S87HF SITE
TI AL
Legend
BRE S ER
EN
Archaelogical Areas
FI D
ON UG
RO
AD
ET T RE
RO AD
NM W TO
D EA
Area of Main Map
C MO DY
&
Legend
TE PE
TR KS
AF
OR RB
T EE
OU
R AN LIV SU
D OA
GH RO AD
ND WA SW T OR H BR G ID ER D OA
CARNWATH ROAD
15
30
60 Metres
90
120
S87HF
WANDSWORTH
APPENDIX 3C PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT HERITAGE PLAN S87HF SITE
Title:
Appendix 4 Photographs of the site and surroundings
Appendix 4 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
Area of Main Map
Legend
&
AF
S87HF
0 25 50 100 Metres 150 200
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345
WANDSWORTH
CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-01973 Date : .................................. 2011/10/26 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
Title:
APPENDIX 4 AERIAL PLAN S87HF SITE
View of Whiffin Wharf and Hurlingham Wharf looking west towards residential properties which overlook the site from Carnwath Road.
View across Whiffin Wharf and Hurlingham Wharf looking southeast towards properties on the south side of the river. The Carnwath Road Industrial Estate is also visible on the left.
Appendix 4 Page 3
View of the existing retail and storage units within the Carnwath Road Industrial Estate, looking southeast.
View of the rear of existing Carnwath Road Industrial Estate units and Thames Path, looking east.
Appendix 4 Page 4
Appendix 5 Transport plan
Appendix 5 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
&
Area of Main Map
Legend
AF
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM Access
Traffic Calming
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed Shaft Site TfL Road Network Thames Path Transport Access Route
London Cycle Routes
S87HF Egress Parking

0 25 50
100 Metres 150 200
WANDSWORTH
Title:
APPENDIX 5 TRANSPORT PLAN S87HF SITE
R E T E P
1
6 5
s r e p e e k l o o h c e S s u o H
2
O U G H
3
South Park
Works
4
d r a Y s l l i M
5
4 6
68
3 7
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
Status:
O P
4 1 3
O B R R O
B TC
LB
4.4m
76 FB
3 2
5 2
58
Barton House
4 1
Games Court
1
5 3
7 3
54
8 6
D Fn
6 2 o3 8t 1 3
Lodge
8 3
7 4
9 4
0 8
0 5
LB
4 8
1 5
3 4
4.2m
2 6
5 3
8 3 3
O R N A V I L U S
D A
Playground
9 3
51
45
6 34
3 1
9 4
0 4
7 2
El Sub Sta
38
39
8 3
1 5
P
5 2 6 8
8 35
El Sub Sta
1 3
G N I L R U H
7 3
M A H
8 8
27
Q S G N I L R U H M A H
5 2
O R N A V I L U S
9 1
13
0 9
6 1
3 3 1
B
9 1
0 2
2
6 1
9
Philpot Square
1b
6 2
1a
25 o t 61 o 16 t 2 4
Park
Works
The Piper Building

Block 1
W N R A C
H T A
D A O R
Works Warehouse
Warehouse
s B C T
El
Timber Yard
9 2 t o 1 0 4
C A R N WA T HR O A D
5.4m
2 0 7
5.5m
12.4m
BS TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL
Whiffin Wharf
8 9 t o 1 0 1
Play Area
Shingle
P e t r o f i n a Wh a r f
FOOTPATH CLOSURE
s e m a h T r e v i R
& t s n o C y l s A L G , t s n o C o r o B W L C C
B L
y d B
10 m
100 m
SCALE 1 : 1000 PEDESTRIAN / CYCLE DIVERSION ROUTE

Revision History
Iss
W d ar
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JSHE
EPER
PSTV
20/09/2011
Battersea Reach
25m ID SHAFT
W L C C
Hopper
Durham Wharf
H o p p e r s
Tank
37 North Wharf Road,

E C A R R E T
Pier Wharf
Paddington, London W2 1AF

Location Code: OS Reference:
B o r o C o n s t , G L A s l y C o n s t &L BB d y
The Point, 7th Floor,
s k n a T
Hopper
b u S l E
a t S
R E I P
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
S M
TQ2475
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS
Project Group:
LONDON TIDEWAY TUNNELS

Location / Town:
R E CE I P A R R E T
WASTE 5 0
Sheet Size: Rev:
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM S87HF - TRINIDAD WHARF
Site Name: Project Name:
e n y o r G
PH
1 4
Sluice
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
W E J
e l g n i h S
s d r a l l o B
6 4 o3 6t 3 2
Drawing Title:
Posts
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN S87HF

Drawing No.: Scale:
PLOTTED ON
04/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_2\dms04380\100-DE-TRA-S87HF-800101.dgn
c Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2008
0 6 o4 7t 4 3
r e t Wa h g i H n a e M
100-DE-TRA-S87HF-800101
5 3 o2 4t 2 1
k l Wa s l o k c i N
W O R
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT

O
W
r af t
1:1000
A1
AA
1 0 0
y d BB &L t s n o C y l s A L G , t s n o C o r o B
on f i de nt i al
10.2m
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
3 2 o1 0t 8
1 0 3
1 0 7
1 0 9 t o 1 3 5
1 5 3 t o 1 7 9
1 8 1
1 8 5
C
1 8 7 t o 1 9 9
81
87
1 4 3
Lonsdale House
Hurlingham
El Sub Sta
Wharf
1 2
7 2
1 3
0 5
7 4 t o 8 2
Sta
Piper Centre
5.5m
86
84
Sub
7 1
1 4 o t 9 6 6 2 o t 2 6
9 1
1 1
H u r l i n g h a mB u s i n e s s
2 1
8 1
9 4
4.4m
2 1
D A
Tennis Courts
Q S
E R A U
El Sub Sta
E R A U
PH
1
5.1m
Swedish Wharf
Depot
5 1 o t 1
Block 2
n h o J
e s u o H t h g i w D
1 o t 8
Auction Mart
Albert Wharf
Tanks
4.7m
3 k c o l B
PEDESTRIAN / CYCLE DIVERSION ROUTE

9.1m
El Sub Sta
SITE BOUNDARY AREA
5 1
3 2
Secondary School
N O G U H
1 5
Hurlingham & Chelsea
D A O R
46
6 2
1 to 26
Cairns House
El Sub Sta
1 to 19
LB
Ismailia
1 to 46 4.5m
House
4.4m
Down House
0 2
8 1
6 1
o t
0 2
m k c a p S
n a
e s u o H
W O T
M N
D A E
D A O R
Fulham Wharf
2 1
Warehouses Warehouses
4
1 to 26
Dwyer House
Comleys Wharf
FB Tanks FB Bollard Mud
Bollard
W H M
Mud
Battersea Reach
4 9
1 1
3 3
7 4
7 1
D A
4.4m
2
FB
1 to
FOR INFORMATION
8 2
4.3m
Keyplan:
D E M O R G N A R O D A
3 29
0 4
THIS DRAWING
1 29
2 5
4 3
Bs TC
Warehouses
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
4 2
a 4 2
2 2
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN

Warehouses
PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
50
4 1
D AN
R EE BR ET RE ST
2
SW O H RT
DG I BR
E RO
1
5 10
AD
NOTES
Warehouse
m ho T
26
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW : 1. PARTIAL CLOSURE OF THAMES FOOTPATH, DIVERSION ROUTE PROVIDED.
s as
D ay
M DY
on nd Lo ol ho c S
7 10
h at nw r Ca
O CK
o t
9 10 1 11
ET RE ST
R TE E P O B R O U G H R O
27
e us Ho
PROVISIONAL DURATIONS: MAIN SITE - 7 YEARS Warehouse TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT - 7 YEARS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PHASES - 1
Works
3 11 5 11
14
7 11 o t
3 12
D A
s k r o
5 12 o t
Tank
n a v i l u S
7 1
1 13
4
2
Comleys Wharf
Tank
e s i r p r e t n E C e r t n e
7 2 2 8 3 2
1 3 7
10
1 4 5
1 5 1
15
LEGEND
AREA OF ROAD/FOOTWAY CLOSURE
TEMPORARY WORKS
EXCAVATION
SITE WORKING AREA
PEDESTRIAN/CYCLE DIVERSION ROUTE

W w ds an h t or e dg i Br
TRAFFIC DIVERSION ROUTE
CONSTRUCTION ROUTE
2 0 1
BUS STOP
W L C C
d ar W R y Bd
C R
y Bd
W h t or w ds e an dg i Br
m ha f r Du har
El Su b St a
EW J
Un d
S
R
nH i h p l Do e s u o
sH s a mp Co u o
Appendix 6 Services and geology plan
Appendix 6 Page 1
1
0 0 3
2
2102
3
4 5 0
SU
3
4
450
5
1 1 4
1 2 1
6
Status:
o 1t
TCB
0101
5104
0 8 1
4.9m
D Fn
0 2
0102
6 2
8 5
0 0 3
1 1 1
2 3
AP
3"
9102
IL3.65m
VT
1094
9
7 1
438
a r d
6 4
4 "
B d y
2105 3101
1 4 7
9107
10 5
9 2 2
6 9 1
Lodge
22
4
8106
42
2104
7110
Sulivan Primary School
7102
LB
3647
6 7
5 3
8 9 1
4.5m
VT
6101
Sulivan Court
7
4 5
0 6
A D
Playing Field
58
6102
A LE
1 "
y d dB r Wa CR
3 7
4"
S E B U
0 0 3
VT
2 1
WO
1
8 6
E N
1001
South Park
1 to 12
3004
3001
4 "
0 S T E P H
68
2 9
6 2 2
1096
4 2 2
2
3
SU VT
VT
E D 30 E 0 N V A L E
3825
SU
SE
79
4.3m
00
8009
4.3m
7013
7012
IL2.01m
WO
1 1 0
Hurlingham Park
O BR
7 9 2 o t 3 8 2
Posts
1 9
4 1
" 4
8 2 2 0 3 2
0 0 3
9004
1221
62
3 0 0
4"
VT
2 8 o2 3t 6 2
Sulivan Court
Lodge
0 0 3
8005
9003
10 8
WO
1 2
Playground
88
El Sub
" 1
Tennis Courts
6002
VT SU
57
1002
316
55 a
13 to 24
Sta
to
0 0
4 "
WO
3005
4106
T e r r a c e
351
55
4 "
3 0 0
h u r c h
98
98
6 5 2 8 5 2
4 7
Posts
96
2 1
s i n n s e t r T u o
8 10
o t 4 6 2
0 6 2
39
3 399
IL1.93m
7007
Bandstand
6001
VT
t o
2 7 2 o t 6 7 2
7 4 o2 8t 2 2
0 0
Playground Tennis
ub S l E
0
31
4.4m
0 0 3
l E
1901
4.6m
5 "
Sulivan Court
6901
0 9 2 o t 4 9 2
3 4 o4 2t 7 3
9 "
3"
3902
0 0
6 9 2 o t 8 9 2
17
1
5.0m
WO IL2.2m
9905
4"
Bu s i ne en s s t r e
46
2 0 3
7 2 2
3 1 2
80
0901
k Ru c a Tr n n i n g
Hurlingham Park
WO
R E T E P
3 8 2
0 0 3
3 6
South Park
R O
2 1 o2 3t 9 1
6 5
68
0338
South Park
Works
4105
1 "
1902
O P
7905
LB
2
4.4m
WO
5 0
4"
0 0 3
58
Sulivan Court
4 1
6 1
Chy Games Court
0 0 3
Barton House
D
9802
5 3
4.8m
7802
7 3
1 "
8 6
2803
D Fn
6 0 1
6 2 o3 8t 1 3
4.5m
Grounds
The Red House Tennis Court Posts
0 0 3
Lodge
8 3
0 0 3
7 4
" 6 R P S
" 3
45
0
4538
9 4
46
1 5
1 5
5 " 9 "
2802
0 8
0 5
6801
5 2 2
LB
3 3
7801
Croquet Lawn Playground
5801
" 9
2 6
3347
1 to 19
LB
0340
0 5 4
4 8
3 4
4324
2801
3664
Pavilions
4.2m
" 4 300
5"
5 3
0 30
8 3 3
" 3
O R N A V I L U S
1
D A
Playground
6802
9 3
SU IL2.44m
0 0 3
East Lodge
6806
0 5 1
51
Tennis Courts
45
5 2 5
6 34
Thames Lodge Croquet Lawn
0 0 3
VT
7 2
Tennis Courts
3 1
" 4 " 6
8 3
0 0 3
El Sub Sta
0 4
0339
4.6m 4.8m Hall 4.5m

5 2
4701
39
m m 0 0 1
8 35
EV WO
6 8
5701
El Sub Sta
7702
Bowling Green
Green
y d dB r Wa
2701
Club
0 0 3
27
3655
5 2
G N I L R U H
A H
8 8
7 3
) 7 8 9 1 (
O R
Sycamore Cottage
N A V I L U S
Tennis Courts
FH
9 1
7 1
m m 0 0 1
m m 0 0 1
8 1
13
9 4
Ivy Cottage
0 0 3
0 9
6 1
Cricket Ground
3701
441 WO
0 2 9 1
2
3 3 1
" 6
3 4
3601
1a
3657
6 1
1b
0 0 3
25 o t 61 o 16 t 42
Park
2601 2602
Works
4.6m
W N R A C
H T A
D A O R
0 0 3
442
Warehouse
Works
6603 6604
Warehouse
6602
0 0 3
" 6
s B C T
0 0 3
El
3599
4776
Bowling Green
Timber Yard
116
3501
6601
9 2 t o 1 0 4 SU
m m 0 0 1
RE FI 2"
4"
RE FI
5.2m Croquet Lawn Bowling Green
IL3.74m
0 0 3
6"
3 0 0
5.4m
4501
3 0 0
3600 5502
FI RE
" 6
5501
0 0 3
1t o2 2
3"
M S
M a r s h
y r n o s a m g n i p o l S
MP
Play Area
Mud
Broomhouse Dock
Un d
Sand and Shingle Jetty
Hard
River Thames
10.2m
Jetty
Baltimore House
2409
SITE BOUNDARY
W L C C
3 x 1829mm CULVERTS
E R m I mm m m F 00 1 00 0m m 1 5 0m 1 0 1
Ascensis Tower
DL W
" 7 " 4
3 1 m m D 0 A 5 O 2" 4 R 1
GAS
5 2 2
2408
0 5
4.9m
ZBV030256
TCB 3401
- LOW PRESSURE ABOVE 300mm DIAMETER - INTERMEDIATE, MEDIUM OR HIGH PRESSURE
2414
3
WO
3407
Hopper
EX N TE
Durham Wharf
H o p p e r s
PROPOSED NETWORK PENDING ADOPTION
3405
3 0 0
W L C C
3 x 1500mm SQUARE CULVERTS
Tank
FV FV FV PS PS 9407 SV FV FV
s k n a T
FV
0 0 3 AGREEMENT/ST. GEORGES LONDON/10-26728
WO
E C A R R E T
0403
BATTERSEA REACH - YORK ROAD 2407 2406
Pier Wharf
OR M RE
BD
2 7 3 1
Hopper
2829
9401
b u S l E
a t S
R E I P
2415
2 7 3 1
2405
5 2 2
0 0
" 7 LB " 6 3 " 4
S M
River Thames
JEWS ROW WANDSWORTH SPS JEWSP1ZZ
PS
J
0 0 3
0401
e s u o H 0 s 2 s o e t n 1 e g n u D
5 2 2
R
HW 9406
" 3
SU
" 3
2401
1401
SE
9403
e n y o r G
PH
Sluice
9305
0 0 3
5.7m
2402 ZBV030257 NF
2 7 3 1
1 9301 4
2
" 3
5 2 2
025
) E N I L N I A M (
6 "
s d r a l l o B
9302 SU
m m 0 0 1
sH s a mp Co
5 2 2
V E L
L E
a r d
Mud and Shingle
14
Bus Depot
WO
Garage
0301 SE 1301
0
0 0
sm
2837
M A H G N I R T 2302 L E
19
1 2
3301
Su b wa y
0302 2830
4.9m
051
K N U R T
6 1
Travelling Crane Shingle Bol
8301
2303
CR
2 7 3 1
" 6
Bollard Bollard
SM
Jetty
Sta
Crane 5.0m
Feathers Wharf
L i g h t e r m a n s Wa l k
6 8 t o 7 5
Bus Depot
m r o N
J
E
S u b w a y
T P
e g a s s a P s n a
M S
2201
WO
Bol
8252
Refuse Tip (Public)

Solid Waste Transfer Station Tank
Mandel House
6"
3t o2 9
1253
Coptain House
MLW Bollard
1903
1 3
D E N O D N A B A
WO WO
m m 0 5 1
D
S
5.6m
M S
gm n i p o Sl
El Sub Sta
8202
94
Chapelier House
1202
1252 WO
Milliners House
S R E m L G m G 0 U 0 M 3 S
d Mu
Y A 0 0
3
P T
TP 3 7 5
0205
SM
400
5 7 3
Depot
y r n o s gma n i p o Sl
TP
9250
El Sub
9201
AWAITING OS DATA
D A O R L R A M
0 0 3
3133 1251
96 4.4m
5 2 2
m m 0 5 1 P H
2839
1
0208
15" VALVE 0201 BLANKED OFF

----->
M S
S u b w a y
o t
Prospect Quay
m m 0 5 1
e l d n a r W e v Ri
3203
8250
8201
Sta Hotel
5 . 4 MP
y r n o s a
3
00
AC AC
3086
9202
500
0206 SE
WO
LS
CON 4S 0252
1201
8 0 1 o t 8 9
ZBV030273
" 4
0 9
m m 0 5 1
mm 50 1
g n i p o l S
N.B.THIS MAIN TO
BE ABANDONED
T N A S A E L TP N I O P
5.2m 0201
150mm 0 5 4
CCL W
5.5m
El Sub Sta
0250 7250
5 7 3
WB
3 00 m m
" 5 1
2
6 "
3132
E U N E V SA D L E I F T S A E
W 3 E R 6 N "A O . 1 ( M B A I A N L N I N D E ) O N E 6 D "
Su b wa y
3092
0 0 2
5 7 3
Mud
m m 0 5 1
SWANDON WAY
y d dB r Wa
37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
9 8 5 Z
" 6
4201
Riverside House
Mud
525
Wandsworth Park
" 5
4"
3102
WB
5 7 3
6 2
7 6 o1 7t 5 1
3134
1101
m m 0 0 1
0 60
2905
k e e e Cr n a L l l Be
9 1
A 1 B 51350 A 0m N T D m R O U N N E 9 K D "
Mu d
1 6"
y d Bd r Bo r o Co n s t&Wa
3274
0 2
Me a n Hi g hW a t e r
0 2
Sub Sta
0 2
El Sub Sta Works
El Sub Sta Switch House
3097
0 30
0101
20
El
Be l l L a n e Cr e e k
1 5 0m m
1 1
Factory Works
3 6 " 1 5 "
WO
6.4m
NF
5.8m
1 1
3101
15"STEEL TUBE RENEWED <---24-9-36 0.75" AP
450mm VALVE WO AND 100mm BY-PASS

S
WO
VC
VC
7153 FH
" 5
1
5 7 3
PH
4.8m
LB
2102
2103 SE
m m 0 0 1
2 4
CCL W
Northfields
1 2 2 0
9 " A B A N D O N E D
9
0 0 6
9002
Prospect
4 1
00mm 1
7 "
7 3
RELAID DEC 1938 APPROX 90 YARDS

0 o1 1t
Works
4
7006 7004
6 "
" 7
7005
0002
4.8m
1002
DM04531
7.7m
1 2 0 0
1003 1004
2 3 o t 1
FH
3001
Cable Bridge
7003
9010
The Alma
7 0 o1 7t 9
1001
c 1
S D 1Y 2 F 1 T O R A P 0 7 9 1 4 0 "1 F 6 O
S Br
VT
CCL W
"
3 6
Mud
46
d 1
b 1
0 0 6
1 1
TCBs
(PH) The Alma

(PH)
1 5 4 " "
16
3 4 0 0
4 "
P U T N 1 2 E 0 Y 0 B R I D GE
13
3138
PLOTTED ON
02/11/2011
BY
R OA D
P LOCATION :
S E G A T T O TC C E P S O R
" 3
7050
A D
NF
WO
m m 0 5 7 0 3 1
7 "
5 7 6
0004
Sub Sta
B
W O L
3100
IL-3.05m
t c u d a i V
m m 0 0 1
e:\async working dir\pw-ttp\_pdf_svc_4\dms04380\100-DL-PNC-S87HF-100001.dgn

R

S E
W
Y O
LD
8 1
0002
5.7m
2001
14
600
a 1
" 4
9001
8.4m
0 5 4
7007
0003
WO
0 30
34
Goods Shed
3093
1008
3051
Drawing Title:
1004
SERVICES AND GEOLOGY PLAN S87HF

Drawing No.:
1002
IL-3.1m
6 8 2 2
2 5 5 0
El
C
3050
2 2
R
O
100-DL-PNC-S87HF-100001
V E L
L E
1 . O N
F E I L E R
W E S
R E
2 o7 1t
5 1
Tennis Court
14
m m 0 0 1
2102
3 2
" 3
NT PO I
6 o2 1t
0 4 o t 2 3
P T
6104
FB FB
8152
4"
m m 0 5 4 SWANDON WAY WANDSWORTH SPS SWANP4ZZ
y r t n a SG
W D
IL-2.92m
WO 3099
SP
Posts
E L
WO
BOC 2008
Weir
6 E T 9 F 2 1 . HA 9 N S 7 8 4 5 5 . 5 5 2 3 1 5 7
n o i t a t nS w o hT t r o w s d n Wa
5 7 3
1101
4009
E
X
WO
8101
0 6 9 0 1 6
0 5 4
n w o hT t r o w s d n Wa n o i t a t S
D A O ER R MO D O P
5 7 3
WO
4002
5 9
m m 0 5 1
WO
Y EWA S I R P R E T N E
e c i u l S
" 5 1
0105
4.0m
6102
8150
Site Name:
4 7
S87HF - CARNWATH ROAD RIVERSIDE
Project Name:
4 6
2151
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
4 4
r af t
5832
e s u k Ho r Pa
6 2
" 7
EV
0107
9 o8 4t 8
4 o9 0t 9
" 4 6101
7 "
0 0 3
2101
1 2
Bowling Green
" 3
" 5
Mud
T H EC A U S E WA Y
4"
WO
" 3
" 5 1
0 0 1
0150
4.1m
3101
4.4m
m m 0 0 1
Location / Town:
Scale:
Sheet Size:
Rev:
1:2000
A1
AA
5 0
4 "F I R E
" 6
6.7m
3
m m 0 0 1
> -
9150
P T
WO
WO
WO 6103
e g d i r B t o o F
2
7 81
4 5
2101
2150
1 o7 6t 6
3096
Y A NW O D N WA S
El Sub Sta
0 6
BF WO
R O D A
0417
BO
5 o6 1t 6
40 YARDS 6" MAIN LAID 31-7-69 5 7

4"
5703 NF
E R I F
Bol
7150
9153
m m 0 5 4
Cy c l eT r a c k
3103
5.4m
PROPOSED #9599 W/R# 42QRPT
PH
3104
m m 0 5 1
450mm
r i e
m m 7101 0 5 1
3152
3103
an d
1 3
5 7 3
Location Code:
OS Reference:
POSITION AND LAYOUT OF MAINS AND ASSETS NOT CONFIRMED

nH a Me
m m 0 5 1
WO
1 2 "
R C
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2275
UBR
Sub Process:
MBRI
Playground
3
WASTE
1 0 0
46 33
0 5 4
4 5 0 1 5 0 m m
3 0 0 m m
Omega Building
0204
L R A
D A O R
468 to 533
0331
" 6
DM04407
U
S9570/1,2,3,4
El Sub Sta
26
BOC1281
4.9m
FB
El Sub
y r n o s a gm n i p o l S
S 2 6 A
6"
8350
0 m0 m3 00 1
" 5 1
" 6 3 " 5 1
K N U R T
5 7 3
7 T F . 8 N 2 2 3 3 7 4 . 6 E 1
" 4
2 3
1 to 55
Charterhouse Apartments
19
Mud
m m 0 5 1
on f i de nt i al
o t
T E E R T S
13
9 o7 1t
0 6 o4 7t 4 3
W O L
" 6
SU
2
W E S
2 7 3 1
2833
o t
B d y
9303
1 5 0
ub S l E a t S
Posts
e f
e l g n i h S
5 3 o2 4t 2 1
" RO 3W S
E J
W
0 5 2
0 5 2
2301
D E N O D N A B A mm 00 1
WO
3083
0350
1 . o N
4.8m
3
Bemco Building
R E
5 4 3
" 9
2 7 3 1
7 4 3
2413
K R O Y
2843
3406
100 m
100 m
WO
4.8m
SCALE 1 : 2000
Revision History
1
o t
0 2
e s u o H y e l i F
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AA
0 0
FIRST ISSUE
JMAB
PSTV
JSWE
27/10/2011
2 0 0 mm
C
Wa r d Bd y d Un
AN E
3 2 o1 0t 8
6 4 o3 6t 3 2
8 9 t o 1 0 1
87
103
107
1 0 9 t o 1 3 5
137
1 5 3 t o 1 7 9
151
S M
81
3941
143
Lonsdale House
Hurlingham
El Sub Sta
Wharf
S87HF (16168m)
" 2
E R I F
WO
Whiffin Wharf
7 2
2064
5.5m
3 0 0
Shingle
1 2
1 3
0 5
5503
2 "F I R E
Croquet Lawns
74 to 82
Sta
Piper Centre
0 0 3
5.5m
86
84
Sub
7 1
9 1
10
H u r l i n g h a mH o u s e
The Piper Building

9601
Block 1
7601
WO
1 4 o t 9 6 6 2 o t 2 6
Works
1 1
2 1
D A
" 3
CR
Parsons
Tennis Courts
" 6
1 3
E m ) R m 7 A 0 8 QU 0 9 S 1 1 M (
SU
WO
DBV198070 " 5 8701
0 0 3
El Sub Sta
E R A U
7710
IL2.44m
3913
h at nw r Ca
PH
NF
DBV014296
360
3 11 5 11
E R I F " 4
NF 5.1m E R mm NF I " F 0 7 8 1 " 6

Swedish Wharf
8704
3348
7701
3 00
1107
0 30
Depot
4.4m
" 1
5 1 o t 1
" 6
0 0 3
406
6701
Block 2
n h o J
e s u o H t h g i w D
1
o t
8702
8703
Auction Mart
0 0 3
Albert Wharf
Tanks
3
7 5
Philpot Square
6 2
" 6
" 4
2 1
" 2
408
0 0 3
4.7m " 6
7602
3 k c o l B
9.1m
El Sub Sta
WO WO
5 1
7 4
" 4 " 6
4
5 0
VT
WO
3 2
Secondary School
N O G U H
NF
D A O R
1 1
Hurlingham Club
Cairns
8801
3707
House
6 2
1 to 26
54
1071
38
WO
" 3
" 9 " 4
7
9801
9804
Ismailia
3646
8802
1 to 46
House
411
4.4m
9803
4.5m
WO
Down House
0 2
6 " F I R E
Warehouses
8 1
0 5 4
6 1
o t
0 2
7709
SU
m k c a p S
n a
e s u o H
W O T
M N
D A E
D A O R
Fulham Wharf
2 1
0 0 3
9703
SU
6
IL2.23m
1 to 26
1755
9702
Dwyer House
Comleys Wharf
Bollard
W H M
Mud
Battersea Reach
12.4m
B L
y d B
4 9
Y S I A D
E N A L
4901
76 FB
5 2
80K
3 2
3645
4.3m
3777
032
4 "
3 0 0
0802
9"
> -
1 "
4.4m
DBV198104 FB
to
5"
4 "
8 2
1 5
145
181
15
185
207
201
1 8 7 t o 1 9 9
1 1
El Sub Sta
3 0 0
3 7
s r e p e e k l o o h c e S s u o H
d r a Y s l l i M
4 1 3
NF
DM09567
8907
VT
El Su b
Chestnut Cottage
3901
" 5
St a
1272
B TC
IL1.95m
" 4
9901
t o
FB
SU
6 " F I R E
E l S u b S t a
2 5
Athletic Ground
Playground
S T R E E T
1 0 0 m m
To w
t o
VT
B L E
nm
o t
85 to 104
4107
0 0 3
4
H A M
ea d
s t s o P
TO
t o
1 1 o t 1
" 5
8906
E L A D N E H P E T S
0 0 3
12
1 3
1
22 5
3 0 0
4 6
3 0 0
WO
0801
El Sub Sta
Warehouses
Warehouses
Works
s k r o
Tank
Comleys
Wharf
Tank
W L C C
4 1
"
4"
3641
1 "
Pavilions
E R I F " 5 " 2
VT
450
A 3 0 L T 0 H E A
AD
"
4 2
" 5
7902 SU
1 4
1237
4 0
82
3 1 5 1
D A O8902 R
4 "
4 8
EA D
1 5 a
3 7
8901
5 "
84
Tennis Courts
2 9
" 3
5 1
Courts
9 2 2 D E R E T E M
St Mathews Church
a t S b u S
13
405
30
4 "
3 0 0
7901
1 7
T HS G I E N L O WO
16
3 0 0
4 "
0903
3 2
S T R E E T
1756
0902
LB
100mm
3 8 m 5 m 0 m m
Warehouses
Warehouse
Warehouse
Warehouse
m a h l u F
s t s o P g n i r o o M
Battersea Reach
Shingle
W H M
4 6
1097
0 0 3
0 0
8002
4 "
T E " E R 4 T HS G I E N L O WO
0 0
Sub Sta
298 to 315
248 to 262
" 4
SU
9 1
45 to 64
El
0 0 3
7006 7004
9002
S T R E E T
1274
3 0 0
9 "
Sulivan Court
4104
4"
Playground
4 5
VT
8001
A L T H E A
SU
4 1
1 2
96 a 96 b
" 4
45 0
IL2.19m
2 2
3 0
1 4
WO
7011
1 7
VT
WO
3608
0 0
S u l i v a n C o u r t
4 2
4 "
2 1
0005
IL1.64m
E D E N V A L E
3 0 0
S T R E E T
3 9
4 3
El Sub Sta
f r a h
Shingle
3 6
1 0
T E E R T NS O T S I R F
400
67
78
1004
4.1m
1006
6 "
45
2 4
"
Sulivan Court
Posts
4.9m
S T R E E T
IL1.87m 0001
1 2 2
7 1
9 2
352 to 371
South Park
1001
5"
A D
1 2
4650
4103
IL1.59m
5 1
R C
Lodge
0 9
5 "
New
1 3 0
" 5
SF CL5.12m
VT
4 3
0 0 3
91
4 2
0 0 2
2 0 2
4 4 4 t o 4 8 4
TCB
2103
O R O B R A N
7106
0 0
0 0 3
1095
VT
H 0 G 0 3 U
10
WO
" 3
WO
1 10
2 1
3
00
T E E R T S
7111
" 4
0 0 3
9103
8101
9102
VT
9101
" 7
10 1
0 2
WO
0 0 3
VT
" 3
9 4
3324 7101
9 1 2
D A O YR R U B K A O
0 0 3
WO
5101
6 1
0 3
Hurlingham
3.3m
1 4
1 3
" 6
a 91
91
0 6
1 2
IL1.26m
Y T R A C N A L C
O R
CL5.3m
2 4
" 4 SU 2
AP
P E T E 2106 R B O R O U G H R O A D
D A
SF
0 0
6 3
1 1
4 3
y d dB r Wa R C
VT
3.5m
8107
" 4
9 0
2 2
446
0 3
B L
D A O MR A H G N I L R U H
3.8m
0 5
2 2
7 4 1
" 4 2
El Sub Sta
7 5
VT
6105
8 2
DM09662 0174
0
5 "
3 2
WO
2 5
E MB O C H S A
VT
2
3 3
300
1102
1 5
" 4
8 4
3648
1 2
5 0
7 3 1
4
m a h g n i l r Hu
0 1
0 1
" 3
TCBs
0 0 3
CRAN
2 1
0 0 3
7103
7107
8202
T E E R " T S 4
b u S l E
a t S
69
s n o i s n a tM r u Co
1 5 0 m m
1 3 5
9108
o 1t 1
153 to 172
2 9 1 o t 3 7 1
8 2 o t 1
3 3
21
6 3
6 5
1 t o 9
6 9
4 5
9 9 1
RO AD BURY
4 2
7" 4"
N
0104
3 0 0
GEOLOGY
79
4.4m
1 4 5
81
5
3.9m
403
VT
FOR INFORMATION
1
9 0 2
9 4
1 0 0
7 4
VT
3 0 0
Keyplan:
98
0103
LB
94
6 2
300
86
Ground level 105(m OD + 100) THIS DRAWING
1 2 2
R TT SE
300
940
4 8
5
0
N I
G TO N R O AD
1 5
76
K I L K 30 I E 0 S T R E E T
5 x 63
3 3 2
5 x 63
9 40
3 6
9 5
1 6
7 4
3.6m
3 7
1003
2 3
VT
4.1m
" 4
3
4 "
2 4
4"
0 0
2 5 VT
22 5
3326
OM
4 o4 5t 2
0 5
HO
E AN EL US
5 4 2
" 5
5 7
1 "
5 2
1 "
1 "
5 5 2
50
3 0 0
1 "
42
" 9
4"
6
7 5
El Sub Sta
0002
" 5
7"
R ng ni un
5 6 2
34
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN

1 7 t o 2 0
k ac Tr
4 5
4"
" 5
Base of Made Ground and Superficial

2 1 t o 2 4
WO
PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE
73(m OD + 100)
2 5 t o 2 8 2 9 t o 3 2
s B 5 C 7 T 6
3" 5"
45
U SO
4 o8 5t 6
7" 4"
a t S
mm 00 1
RK PA TH
22
1 0 0 m m
1 "
9 6 2
WS ME
FH
5) 98 1 ( DI
12
3 0 0
Suggested invert level of shaft 60.98(m OD + 100)

S I R OR M
W
6 2
Y A
6 0 0
M A I L L I
O B U G H R O D A
WO WO
4 1
Base of London Clay Formation 53(m OD + 100)
SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME. COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36.
" 4
" 3
4"
22 5
3"
45 0
E M O
" 9
El Sub Sta
ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO THE TUNNEL DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN. Base of Lambeth Group 41(m OD + 100) NOTES: 1. LIMITED FIBRE OPTIC AND BT COMMUNICATION CABLES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. DETAILS OF THESE CABLES AND OTHER SERVICES AND THIRD PARTY ASSETS TO BE CONFIRMED BY FURTHER STUDIES AND UTILITY SEARCHES. 2. INVERT LEVEL OF SHAFT SHOWN. BASE OF CONSTRUCTION WILL BE BELOW THIS LEVEL AND WILL DEPEND ON CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE. THIS IS ONLY PROVISIONAL AS DESIGN IS AT EARLY PRELIMINARY STAGE.
R G N A
3
0 0
3" 7" 4"
" 5
5 0
R O D A
3 29
0 4
5"
0 30
" 9
1 29
2 5
4 3
0 0
" 5
4 5 0
6
0 1
Bs TC
4 2
a 4 2
2 2
Base of Thanet Sand Formation 30(m OD + 100)

ub S l E a t S
O BR OM HO E US E AN L
22 5
h t u Yo b u Cl
h t u So e g d o L
" 9
9 4 1
50
4 1
D AN
0 30
R EE BR
SW O H RT
37
" 4
1
"
E R I F
ET RE ST
DG I BR
0 30
" 3
RO
E R I F
AD
5"
5 10
LEGEND
FW FW
m ho T
" 3
26
on nd Lo s ol as ho c S
ay
YM
7 10
O CK
1 o t
9 10 1 11
R ST
R TE E P O B R
4 5
27
FOUL WATER
e us Ho
T EE
00
O U
14
m 0m 8 RE 1 I F
G H R O D A
7 11 o t
3 12
SW
SW
SURFACE WATER
5 12
" 5
22 5
o t
n a v i l u S
7 1
1 13
CLEAN WATER
e s i r p r e t n E
m 0m 5 1
9 3
C e r t n e
2 2 7
Chalk
G G
E R I F
5"
3"
RE FI
GAS
m m 0 0 1
I D 7 8 9 1 ( )
9
3 2
3 00 4 5 0
CABTV
CABTV
FIBRE OPTICS
" 2
3"
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
mm 00 1
mm 00 1
E R I F
5"
LV
LV
LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
" 6
300
RE FI 2"
RE I 2" F
SYNTHETIC GEOLOGICAL PROFILE DERIVED FROM THE BGS LONDON LITHOFRAME50 MODEL, HISTORICAL BOREHOLES AND BERRY (1979). PLEASE NOTE, GROUND CONDITIONS MAY VARY AND THIS DATA SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR DETAILED ENGINEERING PURPOSES
HV
HV
HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES
5"
6"
2"
EXISTING TUNNELS
RE FI
RE FI 2"
RE FI 2"
w ds an
mm 00 1
h t or e dg i Br
Ensign House
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
WATER - ALL TW ASSETS - ALL TW ASSETS
W e l y o g r a G
f r a h
Kingfisher House
d ar R y Bd
W H M
W
STORM & FOUL SEWERS

Commodore House
R E P I N U J
E V I R D
OTHER SIGNIFICANT UTILITIES ARE DEFINED AS: TELECOMS ELECTRICITY - ONLY FIBRE OPTIC CABLES - HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES - LARGE BANKS OF LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
E R " I 4 F " 4
d ar
y Bd
Baltimore House
Commodore
2411
2403 2410
SUPPLIES OFF
House
h t or w ds e an dg i Br
2 2
2412
4501 D E WO N O WO D N K A N B U A R T " " 6 5 3 1
5
3
00
U J
N R E P I
D
3 0 0
5 2 2
V AL LE Y SE W ER ON SI ST ( EF LI
E V I
00
" 6 E R I F
5 2 2
m ha f r Du har W
El Su b St a
m m 0 0 1 " 7
" 3
25 40
NE LI
6
0 1
CR
" 8
4"
DG I BR
S
O W S
" 4
E
W
D EN
er t el Sh
E
R
RO AD
" 3
5
4
" 4
3 1
"S 4 EW J
Un d
5
0
5
0
R
O
5 4 0
3 1
3 00
7
2
DW
" 75 4 3
n r bu t al S
" 3
2
5 4
A
L
11
D NE DO AN AB
C
O
E R I F
N B
R
H e s ou
" 1
f De
e s u o rH e t wa e u Bl
O
K
e s u o
R E T E P
mm 200
L E
3 1 5
E I
F S
E
W E R
E T A
e s u o rH o h c An
" 4
y d Bd r a &W t s n o Co r Bo
2 5 4 0
W E J
h t a eP d i s r e t Wa
S R
E R I E "F R 6 I " F 6
" 6
2 2 5
" 6
E R I E F R I F
3 00
W
S
3 1
00
A L C
O A
O
N B
R
O O
W
E
y r n o s a
K R
" 6
E I
F S
nd
o 0t 3 2 7
W E
R
RED METE 75mm
LY SUPP DEAD
5 2 5
m 0m 5 1
" 6
4"
4"
DS EL NO RTHFI
4"
s e i r o t a r o b a L
hW g i r e t a
RE FI
8 1
3"
6 8 8 8
d Mu
mm 50 1
e s u rHo e v Ri
525
O D L
00
mm 00 1
M HW
O Y R
W er v Ri
4 5
RE FI
M S
e dl an
C2
5"
4 2
A N
D
NT EASA PL
00mm 1
3"
V A L
2 2
6 o2 1t
E Y
6 5
4"
8 1
O ER SI S R O AD
5" 1
25
W
E
E T N
24
S O I N S ( T O
m m 00 1
SM
1 1
AM " BR
0 30
4 5
600
G G R LE
E L
E I
FO
6 1
TR
L
N I
39
N I
4"
RE FI
W AY
O AD
TY I
" 4
31
R
O
R A B
0 3
4"
0 1
AD
4"
TH
9m 6.
RE I 3" F
00
96
2 1
LO
6" 1
RE I mF 50m 1 RE m FI 50m 1
" 4
13
51
W E
BY AL
50 1
94
C LO
R O
2
5
E S
AD
00
50 50 1a 1b
F
A L
" 3
AN LL BA
O
N
39
50 5
N TI E
R ST
K R
E
L
E I F
T EE
E
R
Appendix 7 Construction phase layout
Appendix 7 Page 1
1
e s u o H
2
4.4m
4
76 FB
3 2
5
FB to
6
4.3m
Barton House
Sulivan Court
4 1
6 1
Chy Games Court
1
5 3
7 3
54
8 6
D Fn
6 2 o3 8t 1 3
Lodge
8 3
7 4
0 8
0 5
LB
1 5
Croquet Lawn
4 8
1 to 19
LB
4.2m
Ismailia
1 to 46
8 3 3
2 6
House
4.4m
0 2
O R
Playground
9 3
N A V I L U S
50
1
East Lodge
51
Tennis Courts
45
6 34

3 1
7 2
El Sub Sta
0 4
39
8 3
Hall 4.5m
P
5 2 6 8
Bowling Green
8 35
El Sub Sta
Green Club
G N I L R U H
5 2
7 3
M A H
8 8
27
O R
Sycamore Cottage
N A V I L U S
Tennis Courts
9 1
13
Ivy Cottage
1
0 9
6 1
3 3 1
0 2 9 1
2
6 1
9
Philpot Square
1b
1a
25 o t 61 o 16 t 42
Park
0 5
The Piper Building

Block 1
Works
4.6m Mud
7 1
B
Works Warehouse
PARKING / VEHICLE MARSHALLING AND SITE TRAFFIC ROUTES
W N R A C
Warehouse
s B C T
El
Timber Yard
1 1 6
9 2 t o 1 0 4
ACCESS/EGRESS
W
Battersea Reach
5.2m
5.4m
2 0 7
5.5m
1125m
1t o2 2
M S
Play MP Area
Broomhouse Dock
Un d
Hard
EXISTING ROUTE OF THAMES PATH

W d ar C R
River Thames
10.2m
Jetty
TEMPORARY WORKING AREA = 15982
SECONDARY CRANE
20m ID SHAFT
W L C C
S E s e M m A a H h T T r R e v i E R V I R
Hopper
Durham Wharf
H o p p e r s
W L C C
Tank
s k n a T
10 m
E C A R R E T
0 SCALE 1 : 1250
100 m
Pier Wharf
Hopper
b u S l E
a t S
R E I P
S M
River Thames
Revision History
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
e n y o r G
PH
1 4
e l g n i h S
s d r a l l o B
6 4 o3 6t 3 2
Posts
Bemco Building
Mud Travelling Crane Shingle Bol
Bollard Bollard
FB
El Sub Sta
Bus Depot
m r o N

Bol
Refuse Tip (Public)

Solid Waste Transfer Station Tank 468 to 533
Feathers Wharf
e g a s s a P s n a
D
Coptain House
Mandel House
MLW Bollard
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
Omega Building
L R A
D A O R
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2279
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS

Chapelier House
WASTE 5 0
Sheet Size: Rev:
Milliners House
El Sub Sta Hotel
D A O R L R A M
1
S87HF - TRINIDAD WHARF
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
CCL W
Mud
CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT S87HF - RECEPTION/INTERMEDIATE SITE

Drawing No.: Scale:
Riverside House
Mud
r i e
PLOTTED ON
02/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
100-DL-PNC-S87HF-100002

nH a Me
r af t
S R E L G G U M S
d Mu
Y A
Location / Town:
1:1250
A1
AA
1 0 0
9 o7 1t
0 6 o4 7t 4 3
Bus Depot
Garage

W E J
on f i de nt i al
5 3 o2 4t 2 1
W E J
W O R
1 5 0
Sluice
AA
AD
FIRST DRAFT
JMAB
PSTV
JSWE
2 0 0 mm
m ha f r Du har
W
El Su b St a
3 2 o1 0t 8
8 9 t o 1 0 1
87
1 0 3
1 0 7
1 0 9 t o 1 3 5
1 3 7
1 5 3 t o 1 7 9
1 5 1
S M
81
1 4 3
Lonsdale House
500m
Hurlingham
El Sub Sta
Wharf
Whiffin Wharf
1000m 1225m
1050m
Shingle
& t s n o C y l s A L G , t s n o C o r o B W L C C B L
PRIMARY CRANE
1 2
7 2
1 3
0 5
SITE BOUNDARY AREA = 16168m
7 4 t o 8 2
Sta
Piper Centre
5.5m
86
84
Sub
1 4 o t 9 6 6 2 o t 2 6
Works
9 1
1 1
2 1
8 1
9 4
4.4m
2 1
D A
Parsons
y d dB r Wa CR
1 3
Tennis Courts
Q S
E R A U
El Sub Sta
E R A U
PH
1
5.1m
Swedish Wharf
Depot
W
5 1 o t 1
Block 2
n h o J
e s u 8 o o t H t 1 h g i w D
Auction Mart
Albert Wharf
Tanks
6 2
4.7m
3 k c o l B
9.1m
H T A
D A O R
El Sub Sta
5 1
5 3
Pavilions
D A
4.5m
Down House
3 4
3 2
Secondary School
N O G U H
1 5
Posts
D A O R
9 4
46
6 2
1 to 26
Cairns House
El Sub Sta
8 1
6 1
o t
0 2
m k c a p S
n a
e s u o H
W O T
M N
D A E
D A O R
Fulham Wharf
2 1
4
1 to 26
Dwyer House
Comleys Wharf
Bollard
W H M
12.4m
y d B
4 9
Y S I A D
58
E N A L
5 2
8 2
D E
M
Status:
O R G N A R
O
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
D A
N
3 29
0 4
7
1 1
3 3
7 4
1 5
7 1
10
1 4 5
1 8 1
15
1 8 5
2 0 1
1 8 7 t o 1 9 9
2 2
1 29
2 5
4 3
Bs TC
THIS DRAWING
Warehouses
4 2
a 4 2
2 2
h t u Yo b u Cl
h t u So e g d o L
Warehouses
ub S l E
a t S
4 1
D AN
R EE BR ET RE ST
SW O H RT DG I BR
9 4 1
5 10
38
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE
Warehouse
RO
AD
EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER
Warehouse
m ho T
26
s as
D ay
D YM
on nd Lo ol ho c S
7 10
h at nw r Ca
O C K
STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED
W f r a h
o t
9 10 1 11
ET RE ST
27
e us Ho
THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
3 11 5 11
Warehouse
14
m a h l u F
7 11 o t 3 12
D A
Works
s k r o
5 12 o t
Tank
n a v i l u S e s i r p r e t n E
Shingle
7 1
1 13
4
2
Comleys Wharf
Tank
9 3
3 4
C e r t n e
2 2 8 3 2 9 7
0m 90
w ds an
0m 45
h t or
e dg i Br
KEY:
W L C C
1225m
CSO DROP SHAFT, CSO CONNECTION CULVERT, PRIMARY CRANE, SECONDARY CRANE AND CSO INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
d ar R y Bd
y Bd
1050m
EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND HANDLING AREA
1000m
STOCKYARD, WORKSHOP AND STORES
Battersea Reach
500m
OFFICES, WELFARE, CANTEEN AND MEDICAL
Shingle
W H M
DISCLAIMER: INDICATIVE CONSTRUCTION PHASE ARRANGEMENT. Ascensis BASED ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT.

Tower
Wa r d Bd y
d Un
CR
DG I BR
er t el Sh
D EN RO
EW J
Un d
S R
O
W
sH s a mp Co
e s u o
e s u o rH o h c An
S R O W
hW g i r e t a
d Mu
1
e s u o H
2
4.4m
4
76 FB
3 2
5
FB to
6
4.3m
Barton House
Sulivan Court
4 1
6 1
Chy Games Court
1
5 3
7 3
54
8 6
D Fn
6 2 o3 8t 1 3
Lodge
8 3
7 4
0 8
0 5
LB
1 5
Croquet Lawn
4 8
1 to 19
LB
4.2m
Ismailia
1 to 46
8 3 3
2 6
House
4.4m
0 2
O R
Playground
9 3
N A V I L U S
50
1
East Lodge
51
Tennis Courts
45
6 34

3 1
7 2
El Sub Sta
0 4
39
8 3
Hall 4.5m
P
5 2 6 8
Bowling Green
8 35
El Sub Sta
Green Club
G N I L R U H
5 2
7 3
M A H
8 8
27
O R
Sycamore Cottage
N A V I L U S
Tennis Courts
9 1
13
Ivy Cottage
1
0 9
6 1
3 3 1
0 2 9 1
2
6 1
9
Philpot Square
1b
1a
25 o t 61 o 16 t 42
Park
0 5
The Piper Building

Block 1
Works
4.6m Mud
7 1
B
Warehouse
SITE ACCESS
W N R A C
25m ID SHAFT 3825m

El
s B C T
Warehouse
Timber Yard
1 1 6
9 2 t o 1 0 4
5.2m
5.4m
2 0 7
1t o2 2
M S
Play MP Area
Broomhouse Dock
Un d
Hard
INLAND DIVERSION OF THAMES PATH
River Thames
Jetty
W L C C
Hopper
Durham Wharf
H o p p e r s
W L C C
Tank
s k n a T
10 m
E C A R R E T
0 SCALE 1 : 1250
100 m
Pier Wharf
Hopper
b u S l E
a t S
R E I P
S M
River Thames
Revision History
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
e n y o r G
PH
1 4
e l g n i h S
s d r a l l o B
6 4 o3 6t 3 2
Posts
Bemco Building
Mud Travelling Crane Shingle Bol
Bollard Bollard
FB
El Sub Sta
Bus Depot
m r o N

Bol
Refuse Tip (Public)

Solid Waste Transfer Station Tank 468 to 533
Feathers Wharf
e g a s s a P s n a
D
Coptain House
Mandel House
MLW Bollard
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
Omega Building
L R A
D A O R
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2279
UBR
Sub Process:
MSTE

Chapelier House
WASTE 5 0
Sheet Size: Rev:
Milliners House
El Sub Sta Hotel
D A O R L R A M
1
S87HF - CARNWATH ROAD RIVERSIDE
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
CCL W
Mud
CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT S87HF - SINGLE DRIVE

Drawing No.: Scale:
Riverside House
Mud
r i e
PLOTTED ON
02/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
100-DL-PNC-S87HF-100101

nH a Me
r af t
S R E L G G U M S
d Mu
Y A
Location / Town:
1:1250
A1
AA
1 0 0
9 o7 1t
0 6 o4 7t 4 3
Bus Depot
Garage

W E J
on f i de nt i al
5 3 o2 4t 2 1
W E J
W O R
1 5 0
Sluice
AA
AD
FIRST DRAFT
JMAB
PSTV
JSWE
2 0 0 mm
m ha f r Du har
W
El Su b St a
3 2 o1 0t 8
8 9 t o 1 0 1
87
1 0 3
1 0 7
1 0 9 t o 1 3 5
1 3 7
1 5 3 t o 1 7 9
1 5 1
S M
81
1 4 3
Lonsdale House
Hurlingham
El Sub Sta
500m
3500m
Wharf
Whiffin Wharf
3825m
750m
1000m
MATERIALS IN CAMPSHED
10.2m
TEMPORARY WORKING AREA = 16000m
OVERHEAD GANTRY CRANE
7 2
OFFICES, WELFARE AND CANTEEN
5.5m
1125m
Shingle
MATERIALS OUT CAMPSHED

C R
1 2
1 3
SITE ACCESS
0 5
SITE BOUNDARY AREA = 16168m
7 4 t o 8 2
Sta
Piper Centre
5.5m
POWER
86
84
Sub
1 4 o t 9 6 6 2 o t 2 6
Works
9 1
1 1
2 1
8 1
9 4
4.4m
2 1
D A
Parsons
y d dB r Wa CR
1 3
Tennis Courts
Q S
E R A U
El Sub Sta
E R A U
PH
1
5.1m
Swedish Wharf
Depot
W
5 1 o t 1
Block 2
n h o J
e s u 8 o o t H t 1 h g i w D
Auction Mart
Albert Wharf
Tanks
6 2
4.7m
3 k c o l B
9.1m
H T A
D A O R
El Sub Sta
INLAND DIVERSION OF THAMES PATH

5 1
5 3
Pavilions
D A
4.5m
Down House
3 4
3 2
Secondary School
N O G U H
1 5
Posts
D A O R
9 4
46
6 2
1 to 26
Cairns House
El Sub Sta
8 1
6 1
o t
0 2
m k c a p S
n a
e s u o H
W O T
M N
D A E
D A O R
Fulham Wharf
2 1
4
1 to 26
Dwyer House
Comleys Wharf
Bollard
W H M
Battersea Reach
12.4m
B L
y d B
4 9
Y S I A D
58
E N A L
5 2
8 2
D E
M
Status:
O R G N A R
O
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
D A
N
3 29
0 4
7
1 1
3 3
7 4
1 5
7 1
10
1 4 5
1 8 1
15
1 8 5
2 0 1
1 8 7 t o 1 9 9
2 2
1 29
2 5
4 3
Bs TC
THIS DRAWING
Warehouses
4 2
a 4 2
2 2
h t u Yo b u Cl
h t u So e g d o L
Warehouses
ub S l E
a t S
4 1
D AN
R EE BR ET RE ST
SW O H RT DG I BR
9 4 1
5 10
38
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE
Warehouse
RO
AD
EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER
Warehouse
m ho T
26
s as
D ay
D YM
on nd Lo ol ho c S
7 10
h at nw r Ca
O C K
STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED
W f r a h
o t
9 10 1 11
ET RE ST
27
e us Ho
THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
3 11 5 11
Warehouse
14
m a h l u F
7 11 o t 3 12
D A
Works
s k r o
5 12 o t
Tank
n a v i l u S e s i r p r e t n E
Shingle
7 1
1 13
4
2
Comleys Wharf
Tank
9 3
3 4
C e r t n e
2 2 8 3 2 9 7
KEY:
3500m
EXCAVATED MATERIAL, STORAGE AND HANDLING AREA
SHAFT, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CRANE, PRIMARY GANTRY CRANE, SEGMENT LOADING AREA AND SEGMENT STORAGE STOCKYARD
500m
GROUT BATCHING PLANT AND SILOS
0m 90
w ds an
0m 45
h t or
e dg i Br
1125m
TBM WORKSHOP AND TUNNEL MAINTENANCE AREA
W L C C
450m
TBM MATERIALS AND SPARES STORAGE AREA
1000m
W
PARKING / VEHICLE MARSHALLING
d ar R y Bd
750m
OFFICES, WELFARE, CANTEEN AND MEDICAL (DOUBLE STACKED)
W d ar
y Bd
900m
Battersea Reach
POWER
Shingle
W H M
DISCLAIMER: INDICATIVE CONSTRUCTION PHASE ARRANGEMENT. Ascensis BASED ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT.

Tower
Wa r d Bd y
CR
d Un
DG I BR
er t el Sh
D EN RO
EW J
Un d
S R
O
W
sH s a mp Co
e s u o
e s u o rH o h c An
S R O W
hW g i r e t a
d Mu
Appendix 8 Operational phase layout
Appendix 8 Page 1
2
3 2
3
9
6
N
Status:
25 o t 61 o 16 t 42
P a r k
The Piper Building

Block 1
A
ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK (2m x 0.8m x 1.5m HIGH)
W N R A C
Works Warehouse
VENTILATION COLUMN
Warehouse
s B C T
El
8 6
8 4
7 4 t o 8 2
Sub Sta
Piper Centre
5.5m
0 5
9 2 t o 1 0 4
5.4m
2 0 7
5.5m
Play Area
10 m
0 SCALE 1 : 1250
100 m
Revision History
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AA
FIRST DRAFT
JMAB
PSTV
JSWE
W L C C
D
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2279
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS

Location / Town: Site Name: Project Name:
WASTE 5 0
Sheet Size: Rev:
HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM S87HF - TRINIDAD WHARF
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT VENTILATION S87HF - RECEPTION/INTERMEDIATE SITE

Drawing No.: Scale:
PLOTTED ON
02/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
100-DL-PNC-S87HF-100003
r af t
1:500
A1
AA
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
8 9 t o 1 0 1
8 1
Hurlingham
El Sub Sta
Wharf
ACCESS
Whiffin Wharf
1 0 3 1 0 7
1 0 9 t o 1 3 5
VENTILATION BUILDING (15m x 5m x 5m)
20m SHAFT
PERMANENT HARDSTANDING (FINISH LEVEL EQUAL TO EXISTING GROUND LEVEL)
1 4 o t 9 6 6 2 o t 2 6
9 1
7 2
1 3
1 1 2 1
8 7 1 4 3 1 3 7
Keyplan:
FOR INFORMATION
N
3 k c o l B
THIS DRAWING
10
1 5 3 t o 1 7 9
1 4 5
1 5 1
1 8 1
15
H T A
D A O R
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
1 8 5
2 0 1
1 8 7 t o 1 9 9
Shingle
2
9
6
25 o t 61 o 16 t 42
The Piper Building

Block 1
A
W N R A C
ELECTRICAL CONTROL KIOSK (2m x 0.8m x 1.5m HIGH)
H T A
D A O R
Works Warehouse
Warehouse
s B C T
El
ACCESS
8 6
8 4
7 4 t o 8 2
Sub Sta
Piper Centre
5.5m
0 5
9 2 t o 1 0 4
VENTILATION COLUMN
5.4m
5.5m
Hurlingham
8 1
El Sub Sta
Wharf
Whiffin Wharf
8 9 t o 1 0 1
VENTILATION BUILDING (15m x 5m x 5m)
Play Area
Shingle
PERMANENT HARDSTANDING (FINISH LEVEL EQUAL TO EXISTING GROUND LEVEL)
25m SHAFT
10 m
0 SCALE 1 : 1250
100 m
Revision History
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AA
FIRST DRAFT
JMAB
PSTV
JSWE
y d BB &L t s n o C y l s A L G , t s n o C o r o B W L C C
D
an d
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2279
UBR
Sub Process:
MSTE

Location / Town: Site Name: Project Name:
WASTE 5 0
Sheet Size: Rev:
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM S87HF - CARNWATH ROAD RIVERSIDE
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
Drawing Title:
OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT S87HF - SINGLE DRIVE

Drawing No.: Scale:
PLOTTED ON
02/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
100-DL-PNC-S87HF-100102
r af t
1:500
A1
AA
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
7 1
1 4 o t 9 6 6 2 o t 2 6
9 1
7 2
1 3
1 1 2 1
8 7 1 0 3 1 0 7
Keyplan:
N H u r l i n g h a mB u s i n e s s
Status:
FOR INFORMATION
N
3 k c o l B
1 4 3
1 0 9 t o 1 3 5
1 3 7
10
1 5 3 t o 1 7 9
1 4 5
1 5 1
1 8 1
15
THIS DRAWING
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
1 8 5
6
VENTILATION BUILDING (SHAFTS)

107m (AOD +100) REMOVABLE COVER ABOVE FLAP VALVES (LOCKABLE)
Status:
WORK IN PROGRESS
Keyplan:
N
10
3m
9m
107m (AOD + 100m)
20
RI
ES
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36.

2m
ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
VARIBLE DEPENDING ON
NOTE: 1. STRUCTURE TO BE PROTECTED BY REMOVABLE HANDRAILS IN THE TEMPORARY CASE.

GROUND LEVEL
2. POSITION OF COVERS ARE VARIABLE WITHIN 10m FROM THE EDGE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE LOCATION IS BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT 3. CLADDING OF VENTILLATION BUILDING TO SUIT LOCATION AND AESTHETICS. 4. ALL TOP STRUCTURES TO HAVE:ACCESS STAIRS/LADDER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT HAND RAILING 5. ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.
7m (AOD +100m) REMOVABLE COVER ABOVE SHAFT (LOCKABLE)
5000
REMOVABLE COVERS ARE SPLIT UP INTO SECTIONS AND SUPPORTED BY BEAMS, WHICH ARE ALSO REMOVABLE
50
00
15000
SCALE 1:100
DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF TOP STRUCTURE ABOVE MAIN AND INTERMEDIATE SHAFTS VENTILATION TOWER (SHAFTS)
- - 10000
- - - - - - AB DRAFT-SECOND ISSUE IL RS
Dsgnr
GT DS
Chkd
GT CH
Appd
27-11-09 - 22-05-09
Date
AA DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
Iss Description
Location Code: OS Reference: Security Reference: Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
---
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
LTTDT
Location / Town: Site Name:
WASTE LONDON N/A

50
Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
3m DIA
Project Name:
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:

Drawing Title:
SCALE 1:50
GENERIC ELEVATION AND TOP STRUCTURE FOR OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT - SHAFT SITES
Drawing No.:
PLOTTED ON
04\12\09
BY
Andy.Purdy
LOCATION :
Thames Tideway Tunnel
x:\project\371840\cad\design data\cad thames\drawings\planning-consents\Routewide\100-DH-GEN-00000-000002.dgn
100-DH-GEN-00000-000002
NTS
A1
AB
100
150
200mm
Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables

Transport Site considerations Access to road network Single main tunnel drive site Comments Site accesses onto Carnwath Road from the disused Trinidad Wharf and industrial site. On-street parking in the vicinity of the access may affect the turning movements of construction vehicles and may require removal. In the case of the single drive option, the site features a site access in the east adjacent to the existing access to the industrial estate, with an egress to the west. Permanent site access located opposite the Piper Centre on Carnwath Road. Carnwath Road is subject to a 30mph speed limit, is street lit and traffic calmed (speed cushions). It has a Mitigation required and conclusions Removal of some on-street parking bays on Carnwath Road may be required if the turning movements of construction vehicles using the access are restricted. Alternative parking available within vicinity of site. Conclusion: Road access to site likely to be suitable for HGVs for accessing the TLRN (A3205). Some on-street parking may also need to be removed if found to restrict the turning movements of construction vehicles using the site access. Access route to the TLRN (A3205) passes over Wandsworth Bridge with no visible restrictions. Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Same as for main tunnel Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. (single drive) see left. Except in the case of the reception/ intermediate option, the site access and egress are both located in the same position opposite the Piper Centre on Carnwath Road.
Appendix 9 Page 1
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site Comments carriageway width of 8.0m and contains on-street parking (reducing effective carriageway width to 6.0m). Some parking spaces will require removal if found to affect the turning movements of construction vehicles using the site access. Visibility splays in both directions from the site access are acceptable (more than 90m provided). Access to the A3205 (TLRN strategic highway network) along Carnwath Road (eastbound) onto Wandsworth Bridge Road and across Wandsworth Bridge. Carnwath Road is traffic calmed featuring speed cushions (which will not require removal). There are no visible restrictions over Wandsworth Bridge. Distance to TLRN 0.8km. Mitigation required and conclusions Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 2
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site Comments A preliminary transport access plan is attached as Appendix 5. Access to river Located directly adjacent to river. Material import and export provided via campsheds that will require construction. Access to existing railway sidings at Clapham Junction uses the same route to the TLRN (A3205) although continues across the gyratory between the A217 and A3205 on to the A214. The route then turns onto East Hill, following on to St Johns Hill before turning onto Plough Road for the Clapham Junction, Traincare Depot railway sidings. The route contains the same constraints as the route to the TLRN (A3205), in addition to passing through a Located directly adjacent to river. Material import and export provided via campsheds that will require construction. Route to possible rail link at Clapham Junction runs through a high street area along St Johns Hill and under a rail bridge with no visible restrictions, in addition to the constraints encountered on accessing the TLRN (A3205). Clapham Junction railway sidings at the Traincare Depot accessible using Plough Road. River access is not essential for a reception/intermediate site as materials are likely to be transported away by road. River access is not essential for a reception/intermediate site as materials are likely to be transported away by road. Mitigation required and conclusions Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Access to rail
Same as for main tunnel Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. (single drive) see left.
Appendix 9 Page 3
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site Comments high street area along St Johns Hill. There are no visible restrictions under the rail bridge on Trinity Road. Distance 1.9km to rail access point from shaft site. Parking Parking could be provided within the site boundary for workforce. Parking is available on Carnwath Road for pay and display users Mon-Sat, 9:00-17:00, at 1.80/hr for a maximum eight hours (unlikely to be suitable for workforce). Some on-street parking Same as for main tunnel Same as for main tunnel spaces may require removal (single drive) see left. (single drive) see left. to allow construction vehicles access to the site. Alternative parking for displaced parking is provided on Carnwath Road and surrounding roads. Parking for workforce could be provided within site boundary. PTAL least suitable. Public transport access issues for workforce. Workforce transport could be provided. On-street parking may require removal, with alternative parking available within close proximity of the Same as for main tunnel Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. (single drive) see left. Mitigation required and conclusions Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Public transport accessibility
PTAL 1-2, as identified within Table 2.3.
Traffic management
Removal of on-street parking on Carnwath Road may be required in order to accommodate HGV access.
Same as for main tunnel Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. (single drive) see left.
Appendix 9 Page 4
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site Comments Existing site access will require widening. The Thames Path will require diversion around the site. A preliminary transport management plan is attached as Appendix 5. Mitigation required and conclusions site. Existing site access will require widening. The Thames Path will require diversion around the site. Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: The site is considered to be suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site as potential road and rail access routes are suitable for HGVs. In the case of the main tunnel single drive option, the site has good access to the river and material import and export is proposed using campsheds that will require construction. For both site options, the route to rail would pass through a high street area. To enable site access, some on-street parking bays on Carnwath Road may require removal if found to affect the turning movements of construction vehicles accessing the site (alternative parking may be available nearby). The potential for the workforce to access the site by public transport is low, however parking for the workforce could potentially be allocated within the site boundary, or workforce transport may need to be provided. The Thames Path will require diversion around the site.
Appendix 9 Page 5
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Designations, including archaeological priority areas Summary of historical uses Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments No designations within the site boundary. Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable.
The site appears to have been largely undeveloped until the early 20th century. By the 1960s, the site was heavily developed and is marked on the map as Hurlingham Wharf. An archaeological evaluation was undertaken in 1996 in the west of the site. This evaluation identified archaeological material likely to be considered of medium value. This does not preclude the possibility of unrecorded archaeological receptors of high value being present elsewhere within the site. An evaluation undertaken in the west of the site in 1996 has identified a prehistoric pit feature and multi-period alluvial deposits containing archaeological material. These archaeological receptors are likely to be considered of medium value; further material of medium value may be anticipated elsewhere within the site. Dewatering of potential waterlogged deposits may be an issue, considering the close proximity of the site to the Thames.
A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A full review of previous archaeological evaluations as part of a detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Potential receptors of very high or high value with the potential to be directly affected Potential receptors of medium value with the potential to be directly affected
A full review of previous archaeological evaluations as part of a detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Other receptors with the potential to be directly affected
A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Appendix 9 Page 6
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Archaeology Site considerations Extent of existing disturbance (if known) Potential issues Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments Previous archaeological investigations have shown that archaeological material, including alluvial deposits, survive within the site. The extent of this survival is not known. Detailed design proposals and an outline method statement will be required to enable initial assessment of development impacts, and to inform mitigation proposals. Archaeological receptors of medium value have been identified in the west of the site. Further archaeological receptors, including alluvial, peat and waterlogged deposits, may be anticipated within the location of the shaft and crane sites. Mitigation required and conclusions A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. Mitigation methods could include: desk-based assessment production of deposits model archaeological monitoring of geotechnical investigations archaeological evaluation archaeological watching brief archaeological excavation.
Summary: Based on current information, the site is considered less suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site as there are records of archaeological receptors of medium value, including alluvial deposits, within the western part of the site. It is reasonable to anticipate that further archaeological receptors of high or medium value may be present elsewhere within the site and that these may include waterlogged deposits. Further desk-based assessment is required to assess in detail the risk posed by archaeological receptors within this site.
Appendix 9 Page 7
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Designations including conservation areas, including trees Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments Listed buildings There are no listed buildings within 250m of the S87HF. Locally listed buildings Although the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham maintains a list of locally listed buildings, this data was not available at the time of this assessment. There are no locally listed buildings within 250m of the site within the boroughs of Richmond upon Thames and Wandsworth. Conservation Aareas Sands End Conservation Area: 0m Hurlingham Conservation Area: 200m Registered historic parks and gardens There are no registered historic parks and gardens within 250m of S87HF. Locally listed parks and gardens There are no locally listed parks and gardens within 250m of S87HF. Protected views There are no protected views within 250m of the site within the borough of Wandsworth. Information on protected views is not currently available for the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. Mitigation required and conclusions In the case of conservation areas, a high-quality scheme design and adequate screening for the development may be required, as discussed below. A detailed desk-based assessment in conjunction with archaeological work will be required to further inform the likely impact of the development, and to determine more detailed mitigation proposals.
Appendix 9 Page 8
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be directly affected Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be directly affected Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments Sands End Conservation Area is likely to be directly impacted on as a result of the development scheme. Mitigation required and conclusions Mitigation to enhance or preserve the character or appearance of Sands End Conservation Area will be required. This is likely to require a high-quality scheme design in order to mitigate potential adverse impacts on the designated area.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
There is potential for the Hurlingham Conservation Area to be indirectly affected by the development.
The conservation area has no direct visual relationship with the site. As such, it is unlikely that the development will result in any impact and consequently no mitigation would be required.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Appendix 9 Page 9
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Sensitive landscape character areas likely to be affected, including trees and TPOs Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments The site is within the Thames Policy Area and in a conservation area. The site is located partly on a vacant plot and partly on an existing, operational industrial estate with commercial units. The mixed-use Piper Building and Carnwath Road lie to the north, the River Thames to the south, a medium-density residential development to the west and Wandsworth Bridge to the east. A designated Thames Path runs through part of the site and is currently diverted around the vacant part of the site. The presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings would potentially result in temporary, adverse direct impacts on the character of the river frontage and temporary, adverse indirect impacts on neighbouring areas. Demolition of buildings will potentially create a void in the streetscape and character of the river frontage. Open views from the river, neighbouring roads, adjacent properties, properties on the opposite side of the river and Wandsworth Bridge of vacant industrial site and adjacent industrial estate. Partial views from the Piper Building. During construction, views of construction activity, storage of materials and machinery from all identified Mitigation required and conclusions Retention of trees where possible and protection in accordance with BS 5837 (where relevant). Introduction of landscape scheme to include appropriate surface treatments and planting to relate to river frontage. Introduction of appropriate new planting along the river frontage. Presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings on site would potentially impact the character of the site and river frontage. Appropriate mitigation such as screening would reduce impacts. Demolition of buildings could, with appropriate mitigation, provide a positive impact on the character of the streetscape and river frontage.
Potential views likely to be affected
Demolition of buildings could create an opportunity to improve visual amenity. During construction, use of hoardings and appropriate lighting to minimise visual intrusion. Design of finished appearance of top structure and ventilation column to be given careful consideration. Introduction of landscape scheme, including
Appendix 9 Page 10
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments viewpoints. Permanent elements would also be visible, especially from the river. Mitigation required and conclusions planting to integrate and screen permanent plant, to maintain and improve visual amenity of the river frontage and neighbouring streetscape. Demolition of buildings would change views and there would be scope for softening views with new planting. Any permanent structures will need to be of a high-quality design in order that their visual intrusiveness is minimised and, in particular, so that they preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sands End Conservation Area and park.
Particular considerations on sites where new permanent structures are required Potential issues
The development site is located within Sands End Conservation Area and, as such, should be of a high-quality design to ensure it preserves or enhances the character of the area.
The main consideration is the development sites The scheme design will have to be of a sufficiently location within the Sands End Conservation Area. There high quality so that it preserves or enhances the is potential to mitigate adverse impacts through a character or appearance of the Sands End high-quality scheme design. Conservation Area.
Appendix 9 Page 11
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: The site is considered suitable from the perspective of built heritage as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site, as impacts on built heritage receptors are likely to be limited to the Sands End Conservation Area and the site is less likely to result in severe adverse impacts on built heritage receptors. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality design (with screening where appropriate) is likely to be required to ensure that the Sands End Conservation Area is preserved or enhanced. This site is considered suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site from the perspective of townscape since its character is industrial in nature, and although during construction the presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings on site would impact the character of the site, the demolition of existing buildings and appropriate mitigation to integrate the permanent elements could potentially enhance the character of the river frontage and surrounding streetscape.
Appendix 9 Page 12
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Hydrogeological conditions (groundwater and surface water). From BGS Geological Model, giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. Single main tunnel drive site Comments Geology (thickness) Superficial geology and made ground (32m) London Clay (20m) Lambeth Group (12m) Thanet Sand (11m) Hydrogeology Piezometric Level: ~ -25mAOD (~30mbgl) from EA Jan 08 water level contouring Groundwater monitoring location EA hydrometry sites: TQ27-159 approximately 915m southwest of the site (other side of the River Thames) (water levels to March 2009) SPZs and SPZ groundwater users Not located in a source protection zone A simple volumetric approach has been used to calculate the total catchment of the Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Mitigation required and conclusions The shaft will be constructed to an invert level of approximately 44mbgl, therefore the shaft will be founded in the London Clay. Piezometric head(1) in Chalk will be approximately 14m above the base of the construction. Reception/intermediate site Comments Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Mitigation required and conclusions Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left.
Appendix 9 Page 13
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site Comments EA licensed groundwater abstractions and details No public water supply Five licensed abstraction borehole within 2km radius Licence numbers: 1. 28/39/42/0071 (1 borehole) 2. 28/39/41/0081 (1 borehole) 3. 28/39/39/0177 (2 boreholes) 4. 28/39/39/0157 (1 borehole) Locations: 1. 325m southeast of the site (other side of the River Thames) 2. 1.25km southwest of the site (other side of the River Thames) 3. 875m northwest of the site 4. 1.7km northeast of the site Operator: 1. Hanson Quarry Prod Europe Mitigation required and conclusions abstraction borehole. A conservative mean annual recharge of 100mm/year was used to calculate a radius for licensed abstraction boreholes as follows: 1. 137m 2. 80 m 3. 109m 4. 425m As a result, the shaft is not located within the theoretical total catchment zone of EA licensed abstractions, a source protection zone (SPZ) defined by Environment Agency (EA) or local authority (LA) unlicensed abstractions. Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 14
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site Comments Ltd 2. London Borough of Wandsworth 3. Trustees of the Hurlingham Club 4. Circadian Limited Abstracted aquifer unit: 1. Chalk 2. Chalk 3. Gravel 4. Chalk Abstraction purposes: 1. Industrial, commercial and public service (mineral products general use) 2. Industrial, commercial and public service (municipal grounds make-up or top-up water) 3. Industrial, commercial and public service (sports Mitigation required and conclusions Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 15
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site Comments grounds/facilities spray irrigation) 4. Production of energy (electricity-boiler feed) Abstraction quantity (annual): 1. 23,515m3 2. 8,000m3 3. 15,000m3 4. 227,300m3 Local authorities (LA) unlicensed groundwater abstractions and details No abstraction borehole within 1km radius. Borehole locations There are 18 historical records and depths of water wells: Fifteen deep wells and three shallow wells within 1km radius. Depth range: 101.8 192.02m Depth range: 6.8 9.1m Not applicable Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Mitigation required and conclusions Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 16
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Potential impacts on surface water features Single main tunnel drive site Comments The site is located adjacent to the River Thames, with campsheds for the loading and unloading of barges directly on the foreshore. There is therefore a direct pollution risk to the Thames during loading and unloading, as well as an indirect route through site drainage. No impact on groundwater at depth is likely since the main shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (unproductive strata). At shallow depth, the shaft is located in alluvium, which is classified as a secondary aquifer. Limited impact on shallow aquifer if water is excluded from the excavation by sheet piling. No mitigation required if groundwater is not impacted. Specific mitigation measures to manage the loading and unloading process and to Mitigation required and conclusions Work needs to be undertaken in consideration of Pollution Prevention Guidelines PPG1, PPG5 and PPS23. Reception/intermediate site Comments While the site is located adjacent to the River Thames, there is no direct pathway for pollution to the River Thames. There is an indirect route through site drainage. Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Mitigation required and conclusions Work needs to be undertaken in consideration of Pollution Prevention Guidelines PPG1, PPG5 and PPS23.
Potential impacts on groundwater (resources and quality)
See below (likely types of mitigation measures that will be required)
Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left.
Likely types of mitigation measures that would be required
Not applicable. Specific mitigation measures to manage the loading and unloading process and to manage drainage (behind
Appendix 9 Page 17
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site Comments manage drainage (behind Thames Flood defences) to prevent pollution should be feasible. Potential issues The main shaft to be excavated in London Clay but to be below piezometric head in Chalk. Potential pressure effects. Limited impact on flow in shallow aquifer. Mitigation required and conclusions Thames Flood defences) to prevent pollution should be feasible. Confined head in Chalk to be considered as part of geotechnical design. Impact on and mitigation for shallow aquifer will depend on construction design. Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: In terms of hydrogeology, this site is considered suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/ intermediate site because the shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (unproductive strata). The Chalk piezometric head is likely to be approximately 14m above the base of construction and should be taken into account in the engineering design. No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected. The superficial deposits at the site comprise alluvium, which is classified as a secondary aquifer at the shaft site. There is potential for a limited impact on flow in the shallow aquifer due to sheet piling. In terms of surface water resources, this site is considered to be less suitable as a main tunnel single drive site because there is a direct pathway for pollution to the River Thames as well as an indirect route through site drainage. Specific mitigation would be required to manage loading and unloading of barges on the campsheds. In the case of the main tunnel reception/intermediate site, it is considered suitable as there is no direct pathway for pollution to the River Thames.
Appendix 9 Page 18
Ecology (terrestrial and aquatic) Site considerations Statutory designations Non-statutory designated wildlife sites Single main tunnel drive site Comments No sites within 2km River Thames and Tidal Tributaries SMI lies immediately adjacent to site. Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable Any construction on the foreshore (such as the campsheds) would potentially require negotiation with the EA, post-works restoration and compensatory habitat provision. Compensatory provision may be required but the areas are small and this is likely to be easily achieved. Great care will be required to ensure no entry/ leaching of spoil into the River Thames. Any construction on the foreshore (such as the campsheds) would potentially require negotiation with the EA, post-works restoration and Reception/intermediate site Comments Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. River Thames and Tidal Tributaries SMI lies immediately adjacent to site. Mitigation required and conclusions Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Not applicable, unless construction is anticipated in the foreshore.
BAP priority habitats
Small amounts of wasteland vegetation appear to be present in the western part of the site. It is possible that the site could be classed as UK BAP habitat Open Mosaic (on previously developed land). Aerial photography is unclear on the quality of the foreshore habitat, but BAP priority habitat mudflats may be present. The adjacent Thames
Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Except, it is not anticipated that there will be any storage of spoil on platforms over the River Thames.
Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Except, mitigation applicable to campsheds is not applicable for the reception/intermediate site.
Appendix 9 Page 19
Ecology (terrestrial and aquatic) Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site Comments Tideway is a London BAP habitat. Storage of spoil on platforms over the River Thames will clearly pose a contamination risk. Protected or otherwise notable species within the study area Wasteland habitat may support uncommon or notable invertebrates, locally notable plant species, and reptiles. Buildings to be demolished could act as roosts for bats and possibly for nesting birds. No direct impacts on aquatic ecology receptors, although piling close to the riverbank could result in impacts on fish in the River Thames. Storage of spoil on platforms over the River Thames will clearly pose a contamination risk. Mitigation required and conclusions compensatory habitat provision. Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
The presence of any notable species within the development area would lead to a need for mitigation, which may include offsite provision. If bat roosts were found to be present, mitigation would be required, possibly including offsite provision. If breeding birds were present, mitigating work practices (eg, avoidance of breeding season) would be required. The construction of the campsheds is likely to require detailed aquatic invertebrate and fish
Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Except, it is not anticipated that there will be any storage of spoil on platforms over the River Thames.
Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Except, mitigation applicable to campsheds is not applicable for the reception/intermediate site.
Appendix 9 Page 20
Ecology (terrestrial and aquatic) Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions investigation. Controls may need to be placed on piling operations, particularly in the river. Negotiation with EA required. Great care will be required to ensure no entry/leaching of spoil into the River Thames. No other issues. Reception/intermediate site Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Potential issues
No other issues.
No other issues.
No other issues.
Summary: The site is considered suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site as impacts to ecological receptors are likely to be limited. There is some potential for buildings on the site to support roosting bats or nesting birds and, should roosts or breeding birds be identified, mitigation, possibly including offsite provision and mitigating work practices, would be required. There is a small area of wasteland habitat present on site which could potentially support uncommon or notable invertebrates, plant species and reptiles and, should this be the case, there may be a need for mitigation, which could include a limited amount of offsite provision. However, for the main tunnel single drive site, the construction of campsheds in the Thames is likely to require negotiation with the EA, and may require compensatory habitat provision and post-works restoration which could result in the site being less suitable. Great care will be required to ensure no entry/leaching of spoil into the River Thames during loading and unloading of barges on the campsheds.
Appendix 9 Page 21
Flood risk assessment Site considerations Flood risk zone Single main tunnel drive site Comments The site is partially within the river channel, therefore Flood Zone 3b, functional flood plain. The area of the site which lies behind the flood defences is Flood Zone 3 and defended to the one in 1,000-year flood level. There is the potential for a breach for which mitigation would need to be considered as part of the FRA. Sewage transmission infrastructure is considered to be water compatible according to Table D.2 of PPS25. Mitigation required and conclusions Construction of campsheds would require the development of a cofferdam and should be protected to the one in 200-year tidal return period. An evacuation plan will be required for this site in the event the dam is breached. Mitigation may also be required for the impact of displacement of floodwater as a result of works on the foreshore. The impact of such a physical construction (the cofferdam) would also have to be assessed for the impact of sediment erosion on the integrity of the defences. An FRA would be required to assess the risk of flooding to the site. Reception/intermediate site Comments The site lies behind the flood defences is Flood Zone 3 and is defended to the 1in1000 year flood level. There is the potential for a breach for which mitigation would need to be considered as part of the FRA. Sewage transmission infrastructure is considered to be water compatible according to table D.2 of PPS25. Mitigation required and conclusions An FRA would be required to assess the risk of flooding to the site.
Appendix 9 Page 22
Flood risk assessment Site considerations Assessment of conditions for SUDS Single main tunnel drive site Comments There is space for SUDS and the site is brownfield open ground. The site would need to be investigated for its suitability for infiltration SUDS because of the geology. Attenuation would be possible. Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable. Reception/intermediate site Comments Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left. Mitigation required and conclusions Same as for main tunnel (single drive) see left.
Potential issues
The site crosses flood Flood defence consent defences and if work was to could be required. be undertaken on or close to the flood defences, a flood defence consent would be required from the Environment Agency.
No other issues.
No other issues.
Summary: This site is considered less suitable as a main tunnel single drive site because it is located partially within the river channel and, as such, is within Flood Zone 3b functional flood plain. The site is located across flood defences and would require flood defence consent before work could commence. There is potentially space for attenuation SUDS to be accommodated on site, but further investigation is required to determine if the site is suitable for infiltration SUDS. This site is considered suitable as a main tunnel reception/intermediate site because there are no campsheds in the foreshore associated with this option and the site is not located across flood defences.
Appendix 9 Page 23
Air quality Site considerations AQMA Sensitive receptors Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments The air quality objective for NO2 is exceeded on major roads in vicinity of the site. There are residential properties along Wandsworth Bridge Road (A217) and along the access route from the A217 to the site. There are residential properties within 20m of the proposed site, although there are relatively few residents directly facing the site. The main traffic issue in this area is exhaust emissions along the A217 corridor. See above. Mitigation required and conclusions There is a need for more site specific data. There are relevant air quality sensitive receptors present along the route the construction traffic is likely to take and close to the proposed construction works.
Existing traffic issues Existing sources of significant air pollutants Notable gaps in existing air quality monitoring Potential issues
Additional vehicle emissions have a high potential to interfere with local air quality action plan policies. See above.
There is no data available at the likely access to A217 and the nearest existing data indicates AQLV exceeded. The risk from additional exhaust emissions from construction HGVs is undefined at present. The risk from dust impacts is moderate, although there are relatively few residents directly facing the site.
Collect a minimum of six months diffusion tube data at site access to A217 or other point of access to major road network. Minimise HGV movements on the local road network during the peak hour. Standard dust control measures will minimise the effect of fugitive dust on nearby sensitive receptors.
Appendix 9 Page 24
Air quality Summary: This site is considered less suitable for use as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site from an air quality perspective. There are residential properties in close proximity to the site, therefore there is potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at these properties. These impacts could be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts in areas of already poor air quality. This could be somewhat mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
Appendix 9 Page 25
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Noise Site considerations Noise band level (from Defra noise maps) Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments Information from Defra noise maps indicates daytime noise levels of between less than 58dB and 63dB LAeq and night-time noise levels of between less than 50dB and 55dB LAeq at residential properties on Carnwath Road, located to the east and west of the site, and at the Piper Building to the north. The residential properties facing the site are likely to experience moderate to low daytime and night-time noise levels due to their distance from major roads. Noise levels from the Defra noise maps provide an indication of prevailing noise levels only, and will not be employed in any detailed assessments for chosen sites. There are sensitive receptors located in close proximity to the site boundary. Residential properties at 89-101Carnwath Road, located to the west of the site, consist of three- to four-storey dwellings. The works boundary is located within 10m of the properties and the shaft location at a distance of approximately 30m. Some of these properties have habitable room windows orientated towards the site, although there are relatively few residents directly facing the site. Residential properties located at 5 Carnwath Road, located to the east of the site, consist of four-storey dwellings. These properties are approximately 85m from the shaft location. The Piper Building receptors, six storeys in height, are located approximately 15m to the north. The configuration of the Piper Building is designed as an L-shape, with residential dwellings to the north side of the building and some further residential and commercial units to the south. Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable
Sensitive receptors
Not applicable
Appendix 9 Page 26
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Noise Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments The lift shaft is located on the southern point of the building nearest to the proposed site. This arrangement, along with a blank two-storey office facade fronting Carnwath Road, could provide a degree of shielding to the residential units behind from noise impacts. To the south of the site, on the opposite side of the Thames, are seven- to eight-storey residential flats on Smugglers Way. There are a number of sensitive receptors adjacent to the site access route on Carnwath Road which will be considerably affected by HGV traffic. Existing traffic issues Local road traffic on Carnwath Road and other nearby residential streets, coupled with more distant road traffic on the A219 to the east of the site, will contribute to the local noise climate in the area of the sensitive receptors. Not applicable Mitigation required and conclusions
Existing sources Local road traffic on Carnwath Road and other nearby residential streets, of significant noise coupled with more distant road traffic on the A219 to the east of the site, emissions will contribute to the local noise climate in the area of the sensitive receptors. There are no railway lines or significant industrial noise sources evident in the area. Potential issues Construction: The construction period is estimated at six to seven years for the single drive option and four to five years for the reception/intermediate option. For both options, the working hours will be 24 hours per day, Monday to Sunday. This has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts on the sensitive receptors on Carnwath Road.
Not applicable
Adherence to the good site practices provided in BS5228. Siting of noisy equipment and construction activities as far as is practicable from sensitive receptors.
Appendix 9 Page 27
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Noise Site considerations Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Comments A relatively large number of daily HGV movements are anticipated. This number of vehicle movements has potential to result in adverse noise impacts upon properties on Carnwath Road. Proposed 3m site boundary fencing will provide useful noise mitigation to some plant and construction activities. Situating plant in the central area of the site, along the boundary with the River Thames, would maximise the distance between them and the nearest receptors, and minimise the potential disturbance. Vibration resulting from general construction works is not anticipated to result in an adverse impact. The nearest receptors to the proposed shaft location are at a distance of approximately 15m and it is unlikely that vibration levels will result in minor cosmetic damage during shaft sinking. Vibration levels may give rise to annoyance. Vibration from tunnelling should be considered on a case-by-case basis at particular sensitive locations Operation: With appropriate attenuation (if necessary), there is no reason why noise from the ventilation column and associated permanent structures should result in adverse noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Mitigation required and conclusions Provision of site boundary noise fences. Noisy construction activities, or activities which may cause vibration, to be undertaken during daytime hours only to reduce the noise impact during night-time construction.
Summary: The site is considered less suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site due to the relatively short separation distances between the site and the closest sensitive receptors. The number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and their access route has the potential to cause disturbance to properties lining those streets. Due to the short distance of the shaft location and the nearest sensitive properties, vibration levels during construction may give rise to complaints.
Appendix 9 Page 28
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Land quality Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Grid reference: 525641, 175573 The site Carnwarth Road Riverside is currently vacant and has not been used as an operational wharf for 13 years, as well as Whiffin Wharf to the east and a number of industrial and warehouse units to the west. Generally flat None identified at this stage
Site considerations Site location Current site use
Topography Field evidence of contamination (ie, visual/olfactory) Current surrounding land use (immediately adjacent to site)
Northwest: Industrial and commercial buildings, including the Hurlingham Business Park West: Residential properties, the Hurlingham Club (a private members club) is situated within Hurlingham Park Northeast: Residential properties North: The Piper Building, a large mixed-use building with high-density residential properties including car parking provision. East: Currys superstore Geology (thickness) Superficial geology and made ground (32m) London Clay (20m) Lambeth Group (12m) Thanet Sand (11m)
Geological and hydrogeological information Geological strata1
Appendix 9 Page 29
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Land quality Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Unproductive strata: London Clay Secondary aquifer: River terrace deposits, Lambeth Group, Thanet Sand, Harwich Formation Principal aquifer: Chalk River terrace deposits minor aquifer/London Clay non-aquifer High leaching potential of soils (U) (Note: Information for urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere in the country. Therefore, a worst case vulnerability (H) is assumed until proven otherwise). Not located in a source protection zone. River Thames (adjacent to southern boundary)
Site considerations Underlying aquifer classes Groundwater vulnerability/Soil classification (High/Intermediate/Low/ Not applicable)2 Source protection zone details Surface water receptor
Relevant information within a 250m radius of the site Historical potentially contaminating activities On site Open land, riverside 1874 1896 Wharf/transport support and cargo handling operations listed on site 1896 present Ambulance station on site 1920 1950 Numerous industrial buildings 1920 present Numerous tanks contents unknown 1951 1971 2 no. electrical substation 1951, 1971- present Off site Wharf operations/transport support and cargo handling (closest directly adjacent west of site) 1948 1999
Appendix 9 Page 30
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Land quality Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Pollution incidents to controlled waters Landfill sites Other waste sites Registered radioactive substances Fuel stations/depots Contemporary trade directory entries Tanks contents unknown (closest located 12m west) 1951 - 1976 Concrete works (15m north) 1954 1962 Electrical substations (closest 30m north) 1951 1976 Works use unspecified (40m northwest) 1962 1977 Petroleum storage facility (98m west) 1976 Paper works (120m north) 1954 1962 Broom House Dock (170m west) 1896 present Historical building plans listing underground fuel tanks (closest located 175m east) 1958 Historical building plans listing asbestos (closest located 175m east) 1958 1970 Historical building plans listing above ground building tanks (235m east) 1970 Historical building plans listing oil refinery/oil storage (240m east) 1958
Site considerations
None None None None One Shell Wandsworth Bridge, obsolete (187m northeast) Twelve Car body repairs, inactive (on site) Garage services, inactive (on site)
Appendix 9 Page 31
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Land quality Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site Catering equipment, inactive (on site) Printers, inactive (on site) Car accessories manufacture, active (60m north) Scrap metal merchants, active (91m northeast) Kitchen furniture manufacture, active (97m northwest) Wrought ironwork, inactive (101m northwest) Lighting manufacture, inactive (125m northeast) Cabinet makers, inactive (128m north) Electrical goods sales, manufacture and wholesaler, active (133m northwest) Musical instrument manufacture, inactive (133m north) Activity Potential site contaminants derived from surface sources (eg, contaminants in made ground) 1) Some potential for made ground from potential filling operations during development 2) Wharf operations (transport support and cargo handling) 3) Tanks contents unknown 4) Electrical substation Distance and direction to site 1) On site, directly adjacent to site 2) On site, directly adjacent to site 3) On site 4) On site 5) On site Contaminants 1) Metals, TPH, PAHs 2) Metals, TPH, PAHs, asbestos 3) Metals, TPH, PAHs, solvents 4) PCBs 5) TPH, PAHs, metals 6) TPH, PAHs, metals
Site considerations
Site classification based on above information
Appendix 9 Page 32
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Land quality Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site 5) Historical potentially industrial buildings use not specified 6) Car body repairs/garage services 7) Printers Potential site contaminants derived from offsite sources and transported to site 1) Tanks contents unknown 2) Concrete works 1) 12m west 2) 15m north 1) TPH, PAHs, metals, solvents 2) TPH, PAHs, solvents 6) On site 7) TPH, metals, solvents
Site considerations
7) On site
Potential contamination Source 1: A1, A2, A3, B4 pathways to site Source 2: D6, E1 (Conceptual Site Refer to schematic Conceptual Site Model for explanation of site-specific source-pathway-receptors. Model)3 Contamination category Category 2 assessed as medium risk
Summary: The site is considered less suitable as a main tunnel single drive and main tunnel reception/intermediate site based on the moderate potential for contamination of the site to have occurred, specifically from wharf operations, tanks, electrical substations, garage services, printers and industrial buildings located on site and, to a lesser extent, tanks and a concrete works located in the near vicinity of the site. The potential sources outlined above may impact on site workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact/vapour inhalation exposure pathways. There is also the potential for surface water (the River Thames) to be impacted.
Appendix 9 Page 33
Site suitability report S87HF Appendix 9 Land quality Single main tunnel drive site and reception/intermediate site
Site considerations
Notes: 1. From BGS Geological Model, giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. 2. Soil information for urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere in the country. Therefore, a worst case vulnerability (H) is assumed until proven otherwise. 3. Refer to schematic Conceptual Site Model for explanation of site-specific source-pathway-receptors.
Appendix 9 Page 34
Contacts
For information about the Thames Tideway Tunnel Call: 0800 0721 086 Lines are open 24 hours a day Visit: www.thamestidewaytunnel.co.uk Email: info@tidewaytunnels.co.uk For our language interpretation service call 0800 0721 086
For information in Braille or large print call 0800 0721 086

For information about acceptance of our application and the examination process please contact the Planning Inspectorate. Call: 0303 444 5000 Visit: http://infrastructure.planningportal.gov.uk

Site Suitability Report - S87HF (Carnwath Road Riverside) D Riverside)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Site Suitability Report - S87HF (Carnwath Road Riverside) D Riverside)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Autumn 2011

Site suitability report S87HF

110-RG-PNC-S87HF-000619 | Autumn 2011

Site suitability report S87HF

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Thames Tunnel Site suitability report S87HF

Site information ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 2.2

Engineering assessment ................................................................................. 6 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4

Planning assessment ...................................................................................... 8 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Socio-economic and community assessment............................................. 15

Property assessment ..................................................................................... 16

Site conclusions by discipline ...................................................................... 18

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

TLRN TPA UDP UXO

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF

Introduction Purpose and structure of the report

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site information Site and surroundings

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF

Proposed use of site construction phase

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Proposed use of site operational phase Introduction

4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Restoration and after-use

Engineering assessment Access

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Construction works considerations

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Permanent works considerations

Health and safety

Planning assessment Introduction

Planning applications and permissions

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF

Thames Policy Area

South Fulham Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Nature conservation areas

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Environmental appraisal Introduction

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF

Built heritage and townscape

Water resources hydrogeology and surface water

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Socio-economic and community assessment Introduction

Issues and impacts

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Property assessment Introduction

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF

Crown land and special land comments

Property valuation comments

Site suitability report S87HF Carnwath Road Riverside

Site suitability report S87HF