Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORDER Defendant seeks to introduce into evidence his book Natural Cures They Dont Want You to Know About, a July 19, 2004 infomercial for that book and correspondence from the FTC that said it did not object to defendants dissemination of that version of the Natural Cures infomercial (collectively, the Natural Cures evidence) to: (1) rebut the testimony of government witness, Melissa Joy Dobbins; and (2) show that defendant did not willfully violate the Consent Order. Ms. Dobbins, a dietician, is expected to provide expert testimony about: (1) what 100 grams of protein looks like; (2) how the 500-calorie-per-day requirement of the protocol compares to an average adults daily caloric intake; (3) whether the protocol constitutes a diet; (4) whether the protocol involves portion control or calorie counting; (5) whether the protocol consists only of a magic substance and a few other little things; and (6) what foods contain the substances that the protocol says cannot be consumed, like sucrose and nitrites. She will also provide fact testimony about her purchase of various products that the protocol says must or should be consumed. Defendant says evidence . . . that the FTC explicitly approved Trudeaus description of these exact same items as inexpensive and simple in the Natural Cures infomercial will rebut Ms. Dobbins fact testimony. (See Def.s Reply Nat. Cures at 2.)
Even if the Natural Cures evidence has some relevance to defendants state of mind, it would still have to meet the requirements of Rule 403 to be admissible. See Fed. R. Evid. 403 (allowing courts to exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.). 3