You are on page 1of 4

Final Verdict: JFKs Murder SOLVED!

by Kal K. Korff Copyright 2013 by Kal K. Korff ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

50 years ago on November 22, 1963, American president John Fitzgerald Kennedy was murdered in Dallas, Texas. As the world pays tribute to this fallen historic gure on this anniversary, CONtroversy still rages over whether JFK was killed by a lone assassin (Lee Harvey Oswald) or by a larger conspiracy involving more than one shooter. In this Daily Post special, we prove that Oswald indeed murdered Kennedy. Murder Weapon CONspiracy nuts falsely claim that, Oswalds ngerprints were never found on the assassins rie. This is not true. Daily Post has obtained ofcial photos from the Dallas, Police Department which show Oswalds prints on the murder weapon. Pictures of Oswald holding this rie were taken by his Russian wife, Marina, in their backyard. While CONspiracy nuts say these photos are faked, forensic examination of their lm grain proves they are authentic. Six Seconds Myth CONspiracy nuts deliberately minimize the shooting time of the assassination. They say it is impossible for Oswald to have red three shots in six seconds from his bolt action rie. This six seconds claim is a wholly CONtrived gure. In truth, the time window of the killing was closer to nine seconds, not six. Since the bullet for the rst shot was already loaded into the chamber of his rie, all Oswald had to do was aim and squeeze the trigger and pull the bolt back to reload just two more times. Nearly nine seconds is plenty of time to do so. First Shot Thanks to the existence of the Zapruder lm, which shows Kennedys gruesome murder in enough detail, it is possible to scientically determine the real timing of the three shots which Oswald red. The rst one, which missed JFK, took place at frames

Page 2 of 4

160-161 of the Zapruder lm, was deected by tree branches which obscured some 75% of Oswalds view through his ries telescope. We know the timing of this shot because a small girl is shown running along side Kennedys limousine as hes waving. Suddenly, at frames 160-161, she slows down and stops, and said she did so after hearing the rst shot. In further supportive evidence, both JFK and Texas Governor John Connally suddenly look over towards their right. This is because a shot has been red from their right side, above them from the sixth oor window where Oswald worked and was seen that day. Second Shot This is the crux of the case. In frames 223-224 of the Zapruder lm, the lapel from Connallys suit suddenly ips up (see arrows) in just a fraction of a second. Originally discovered by this writer in the late 1980s, this is the moment that a bullet strikes him, the second shot. It enters Connallys back, having tumbled sideways, shatters his fth rib; exits just below his right nipple, strikes his wrist (breaking his radius bone) and barely penetrates the skin of his leg. It was later recovered at Parkland Hospital. CONspiracy nuts falsely claim that no bullet could cause so much damage and still emerge in the condition it was found. Therefore, it must have been planted. The size of Connallys entrance wound proves that the bullet which struck him rst tumbled sideways before it entered into his back. What caused it to tumble? The answer is Kennedy, who was hit by this same bullet rst, which then exited from his throat and next slammed into Connally. 3D computer reconstructions done by this writer in the late 1980s prove that both Kennedy and Connally were in the correct positions for a single bullet to hit and pass through both men. CONspiracy nuts typically misrepresent the actual seating positions of JFK and Connally, they falsely depict them as sitting directly in front of one another when in fact Connally was seated several inches to the left of Kennedy. Subsequent 3D reconstructions done by independent researchers and forensic analysis rms have since conrmed this fact. Third Shot Frame 313 of the Zapruder lm shows Kennedys head exploding in a reddish haze of blood, brain matter and bone. This shot also came from the rear, and certainly not from the grassy knoll area located to right side and front of JFK.! It is a myth that when being shot, the body always falls backwards. People get this incorrect idea from watching Hollywood movies where the bad guys not only always fall backwards, but dramatically do so through windows, etc.!

Copyright 1977-PRESENT by Kal K. Korff - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form nor by any means without the express, written consent of Kal Korff. Fair use, does NOT apply. By reading this document, you willingly agree to be legally bound by its terms and conditions as specified here. Violators of this policy will have a felony DMCA Copyright infringement notice filed against them with law enforcement. First time offenders may be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for five years, or both. For repeat offenders, the maximum penalty increases to a fine of $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both. This is a DMCA protected document, illegal copying and/or reproduction of its contents are tracked on the Internet and reported to law enforcement accordingly.

Page 3 of 4

Hollywood doesnt use real bullets, Lee Harvey Oswald did. A frame-by-frame analysis of the Zapruder lm proves that JFKs head moved slightly forward rst, at the moment of the fatal headshot, before it snapped back suddenly. It jerks back because of the enormous exit pressure from the loss of his brain matter which splattered up and in front of him. Its simple physics, as grotesque as it is. Fourth Shot There was no fourth shot. While the U.S. Government wrongly concluded in the 1970s that there had been one from a second shooter, based on an acoustical recording of the alleged event, subsequent analysis by the National Academy of Sciences and others proved that the shot captured on an old Dictabelt recording was no shot at all and was in fact recorded at an entirely different location minutes after Kennedy had already been killed. Grassy Knoll Eyewitnesses Predictably, there are a few individuals who falsely claim that they saw or chased a second shooter on the grassy knoll. Jean Hill is a prime example.! Hill says that she saw a second assassin and started chasing him right after Kennedy was shot. However, photos taken that day prove that Jean Hill did not run across the street nor did she chase anyone. In fact, unlike dozens of others, she stayed on the other side of the road and only crossed the street minutes later. Gordon Arnold was another hoaxer who falsely claimed he was standing on the grassy knoll when he heard a shot whiz right past his ear. Arnold does not show up in any imagery taken that day, theres no evidence he was present.! Conclusion While the Warren Commission which originally investigated JFKs murder did not have an airtight case proving that Oswald killed Kennedy, it turns out they were right. The idea that a lone nut could buy an inexpensive rie and kill the most powerful man in the world, Kennedy, dees the imagination of many people, especially Americans. Stranger things, however, have indeed occurred throughout history.! What matters is that we now know the truth about what happened. The time has long passed to accept this truth and pass it down to future generations. When one allows CONspiracy nuts to deceive and hijack the narrative, we disgrace not only history, but! also the legacy of John F. Kennedy. END

Copyright 1977-PRESENT by Kal K. Korff - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form nor by any means without the express, written consent of Kal Korff. Fair use, does NOT apply. By reading this document, you willingly agree to be legally bound by its terms and conditions as specified here. Violators of this policy will have a felony DMCA Copyright infringement notice filed against them with law enforcement. First time offenders may be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for five years, or both. For repeat offenders, the maximum penalty increases to a fine of $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both. This is a DMCA protected document, illegal copying and/or reproduction of its contents are tracked on the Internet and reported to law enforcement accordingly.

Page 4 of 4

Copyright 1977-PRESENT by Kal K. Korff - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form nor by any means without the express, written consent of Kal Korff. Fair use, does NOT apply. By reading this document, you willingly agree to be legally bound by its terms and conditions as specified here. Violators of this policy will have a felony DMCA Copyright infringement notice filed against them with law enforcement. First time offenders may be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for five years, or both. For repeat offenders, the maximum penalty increases to a fine of $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both. This is a DMCA protected document, illegal copying and/or reproduction of its contents are tracked on the Internet and reported to law enforcement accordingly.

You might also like