Professional Documents
Culture Documents
t+
)
assumes xed values for the amplitude , Doppler frequency f
,
and phase
SMS
and f
DMS
caused by the motion of the SMS and the DMS, respectively, i.e.,
f
= f
SMS
+ f
DMS
. The transmitted signal s (t) following the
388
Mobile Relay
(MR)
Destination
Mobile Station
(DMS)
Source Mobile
Station
(SMS)
t m
t
1
t
2
(2)
1
(t) + j
(2)
2
(t). This process models the fading channel in
the MR-DMS link. The doubly scattered component (t) denes
the overall fading channel in the link L
MR
. It represents a zero-
mean complex double Gaussian process, which is modeled as
the product of two independent, zero-mean complex Gaussian
processes
(1)
(t) and
(2)
(t), i.e., (t) =
(1)
(t)
(2)
(t). Finally,
the total signal r
DMS
(t) received by the DMS can be expressed as
follows
r
DMS
(t) = r
LOS
(t) + r
MR-DMS
(t)
= m(t) s(t) + A(t) s (t) A
(2)
(t) n
1
(t) + n
2
(t)
= A((t) + m(t)) s (t) + A
(2)
(t) n
1
(t) + n
2
(t)
= A(t) s(t) + A
(2)
(t) n
1
(t) + n
2
(t) (4)
where (t) is a non-zero-mean complex double Gaussian process.
The non-zero-mean complex double Gaussian process (t) models
the overall fading channel between the SMS and the DMS. It
represents the sum of the doubly scattered component (t) and the
LOS component m(t), i.e., (t) =
1
(t) +j
2
(t) = (t) +m(t).
The absolute value of (t) gives rise to an SLDS process (t),
i.e., (t) = |(t)|. Furthermore, the argument of (t) denes the
phase process (t), i.e., (t) = arg{(t)}.
III. ANALYSIS OF THE SLDS FADING CHANNEL
In this section, we present the analytical expressions for the sta-
tistical properties of the SLDS channel introduced in Section II. A
starting point for the derivation of the statistics of the SLDS process
is the computation of the joint PDF p
2
1
2
(u
1
, u
2
, u
1
, u
2
) of
the stationary processes
1
(t),
2
(t),
1
(t), and
2
(t) at the same
time t. Throughout this paper, the overdot indicates the time deriva-
tive. Applying the concept of transformation of random variables
[11], we can write the joint PDF p
2
1
2
(u
1
, u
2
, u
1
, u
2
) as
follows
p
2
1
2
(u
1
, u
2
, u
1
, u
2
) =
d y
2
d y
1
dy
2
dy
1
|J|
1
p
(1)
1
(1)
2
(1)
1
(1)
2
(2)
1
(2)
2
(2)
1
(2)
2
(x
1
, x
2
, x
1
, x
2
, y
1
, y
2
, y
1
, y
2
) (5)
where J denotes the Jacobian determinant, x
i
(i = 1, 2) is
a function of y
1
, y
2
, u
1
, and u
2
, and x
i
(i = 1, 2) is a
function of y
1
, y
2
, y
1
, y
2
, u
1
, u
2
, u
1
, and u
2
. It is
worth mentioning here that the processes
i
(t),
i
(t),
(1)
i
(t),
(1)
i
(t),
(2)
i
(t), and
(2)
i
(t) (i = 1, 2) are uncorrelated in pairs.
Taking into account that the underlying Gaussian processes
and their time derivatives, i.e.,
(1)
i
(t),
(2)
i
(t),
(1)
i
(t), and
(2)
i
(t) (i = 1, 2) are statistically independent allows us to write
p
(1)
1
(1)
2
(1)
1
(1)
2
(2)
1
(2)
2
(2)
1
(2)
2
(x
1
, x
2
, x
1
, x
2
, y
1
, y
2
, y
1
, y
2
) =
p
(1)
1
(1)
2
(1)
1
(1)
2
(x
1
, x
2
, x
1
, x
2
) p
(2)
1
(2)
2
(2)
1
(2)
2
(y
1
, y
2
, y
1
, y
2
).
Furthermore, the joint PDFs p
(1)
1
(1)
2
(1)
1
(1)
2
(x
1
, x
2
, x
1
, x
2
) and
p
(2)
1
(2)
2
(2)
1
(2)
2
(y
1
, y
2
, y
1
, y
2
) can be expressed by the multi-
variate Gaussian distribution (see, e.g., [12, eq. (3.2)]). Thus,
substituting the expressions of p
(1)
1
(1)
2
(1)
1
(1)
2
(x
1
, x
2
, x
1
, x
2
) and
p
(2)
1
(2)
2
(2)
1
(2)
2
(y
1
, y
2
, y
1
, y
2
) in (5) and doing some lengthy
algebraic computations results in
p
2
1
2
(u
1
, u
2
, u
1
, u
2
) =
1
(2)
2
2
1
2
2
_
0
v e
1
2
2
1
_
g
1
(u
1
,u
2
,)
v
2
_
e
1
2
2
2
v
2
e
1
2
1
_
h
1
( u
1
, u
2
,)
v
2
_
2
g
1
(u
1
, u
2
, ) +
1
v
4
e
2
2
1
_
g
1
(u
1
,u
2
,) h
1
( u
1
, u
2
,)
v
2
(
2
g
1
(u
1
,u
2
,)+
1
v
4
)
_
dv (6)
where
g
1
(u
1
, u
2
, ) = u
2
1
+u
2
2
+
2
2u
1
cos(2f
t +
)
2u
2
sin(2f
t+
) (7a)
h
1
( u
1
, u
2
, ) = u
2
1
+ u
2
2
+(2f
)
2
4f
u
2
cos(2f
t+
)
+4f
u
1
sin(2f
t+
) (7b)
1
=2 (
1
)
2
_
f
2
max
1
+f
2
max
2
_
,
2
=2 (
2
)
2
_
f
2
max
2
+f
2
max
3
_
.
(8a,b)
In (8a,b), the quantity
i
(i = 1, 2) is the negative curvature of the
autocorrelation function of the inphase and quadrature components
of
i
(t) (i = 1, 2) presented here for the case of isotropic scatter-
ing [13]. Furthermore,
i
(i = 1, 2) is the characteristic quantity
corresponding to M2M fading process [14]. The symbols f
max
1
,
f
max
2
, and f
max
3
appearing in (8a,b) correspond to the maximum
Doppler frequency caused by the motion of the SMS, the MR, and
the DMS, respectively.
Starting from (6), the transformation of the Cartesian coordinates
(u
1
, u
2
) into polar coordinates (z, ) by means of z =
_
u
2
1
+ u
2
2
and = arctan (u
2
/u
1
) results after some lengthy algebraic
manipulations in
p
_
z, z, ,
; t
_
=
z
2
(2)
2
2
1
2
2
_
0
dv
v e
1
2
2
1
_
z
2
+
2
v
2
_
e
v
2
2
2
2
2
g
2
(z, , ) +
1
v
4
389
e
z cos(2f
t
)
2
1
v
2
e
1
2
_
v
2
_
z
2
+
(
z
)
2
_
+(2f
v)
2
2
g
2
(z,,)+
1
v
4
_
e
2f
v
2
(
z sin(2f
t
)+z
cos(2f
t
))
2
g
2
(z,,)+
1
v
4
(9)
for z 0, || , | z| < , and
). (10)
The joint PDF p
_
z, z, ,
; t
_
in (9) is a fundamental equa-
tion, because it provides the basis for the computation of the PDF,
the LCR, and the ADF of SLDS processes (t), and the PDF of
the phase process (t). We will provide sufcient evidence in rest
of the current section to support our argument by deriving integral
expressions for the PDFs, the LCR and the ADF using (9).
A. PDF of the SLDS Process
The PDF p
_
z, z, ,
; t
_
according to
p
(z) =
_
z, z, ,
; t
_
d
d z d, z 0. (11)
The closed-form solution of (11) can be given as
p
(z) =
_
z
2
1
2
2
I
0
_
z
2
_
K
0
() , z <
z
2
1
2
2
K
0
_
z
2
_
I
0
() , z
(12)
where = /(
1
2
), I
0
() and K
0
() are denoting the zeroth
order modied Bessel function of the rst kind and the second
kind [15], respectively. The PDF p
(z)
of the SLDS process (t) given in (12) reduces to the PDF of the
envelope of the double Rayleigh process [7], i.e.,
p
(z) |
=0
=
z
2
1
2
2
K
0
_
z
2
_
, z 0 . (13)
Furthermore, using the asymptotic expansions of the zeroth order
modied Bessel function of the rst kind and the second kind, i.e.,
I
0
() and K
0
(), respectively [16], the PDF p
(z) |
>>1
_
z
1
2
1
2
e
|z|
2
_
z
p
o
(z) , z 0 (14)
where p
o
(z) represents the Laplace distribution having the mean
value and the variance
2
1
2
2
.
B. PDF of the Phase Process
The PDF p
_
z, z, ,
; t
_
according to
p
(; t) =
_
0
_
z, z, ,
; t
_
d
d z dz, || .
(15)
This results in the following nal expression
p
(; t)=
1
2
_
0
dxe
x
1
x
_
2
1
2
_
2_
1+
_
2
R
1
(x, , f
, )
e
1
2
R
1(x,,f
,)
2
_
1+
_
R
1
(x, , f
, )
2
___
, || (16)
where
R
1
(n, , ) =
cos ( 2f
2n
. (17)
Furthermore, in (16), () represents the error function [15,
eq. (8.250.1)]. From (16), it is obvious that the phase process (t)
is not stationary in a strict sense since p
(; t) = p
of the LOS component m(t). However, for the special case that
f
() |
=0
=
1
2
, < . (18)
C. Mean Value and Variance
The expected value and the variance of a stochastic process
are important statistical parameters, since they summarize the
information provided by the PDF. The expected value E{(t)}
of the SLDS process (t) can be obtained using [11]
E{(t)} =
z p
(z) dz (19)
where E{} is the expected value operator. Substituting (12) in
(19) results in the following nal expression
E{(t)} = K
0
()
_
I
1
() +
2
2
I
0
() L
1
()
2
I
1
() L
0
()
_
+
1
2
1
2
2
I
0
() C
1
(z) (20)
where = /(
1
2
) and
C
1
(z) =
z
2
K
0
_
z
2
_
dz . (21)
In (20), I
n
() and K
n
() denote the nth order modied Bessel
functions of the rst and the second kind [15], respectively, and
L
n
() designates the nth order modied Struve function [15].
The difference of the mean power E{
2
(t)} and the squared
mean value (E{(t)})
2
of the SLDS process (t) denes its
variance Var{(t)} [11], i.e.,
Var{(t)} = E{
2
(t)} [E{(t)}]
2
. (22)
By using (12) and [11, eq. (5.67)], the mean power E{
2
(t)} of
the SLDS process (t) can be expressed as
E{
2
(t)} =
z
2
p
(z) dz
=2
2
K
0
()
_
I
2
()+
2
I
3
()
_
+
I
0
()
(
1
2
)
2
C
2
(z) (23)
where the function C
2
() is dened as follows
C
2
(z) =
z
3
K
0
_
z
2
_
dz . (24)
From (20), (23), and by using (22), the variance Var{(t)} of the
SLDS process (t) can easily be calculated.
390
D. Derivation of the LCR
The LCR of the envelope of mobile fading channels is a measure
to describe the average number of times the envelope crosses a
certain threshold level r from up to down (or vice versa) per
second. The LCR N
(r) =
_
0
zp
(r, z) d z (25)
where p
(r, z) is the joint PDF of the SLDS process (t) and its
corresponding time derivative
(t) at the same time t. The joint
PDF p
_
z, z, ,
; t
_
according to
p
(z, z) =
_
z, z, ,
; t
_
d
d, z 0, | z| .
(26)
After doing some lengthy computations, the joint PDF in (26)
results in the following expression
p
(z, z)=
2 z
(2)
2
2
1
2
2
_
0
1
2
2
1
_
z
2
+
2
v
2
_
e
v
2
2
2
2 e
z cos
v
2
2
1
_
2
g
3
(z, , ) +
1
v
4
e
2(f
v sin )
2
2
g
3
(z,,)+
1
v
4
e
1
2
_
(v z)
2
4f
v
2
z sin
2
g
3
(z,,)+
1
v
4
_
d dv,
z 0, | z| (27)
where
g
3
(z, , ) = z
2
+
2
2z cos . (28)
Finally, after substituting (27) in (25) and doing some extensive
mathematical manipulations, the LCR N
(r)=
2 r
(2)
2
2
1
2
2
_
0
2
g
3
(r, , ) +
1
v
4
v
2
e
v
2
2
2
2
e
g
3
(r,,)
2v
2
2
1 e
1
2
R
2
2
(r,y,,)
_
1+
_
2
R
2
(r, v, , )
e
1
2
R
2
2
(r,v,,)
_
1+
_
R
2
(r, v, , )
2
___
d dv (29)
where
R
2
(r, v, , ) =
2f
v sin
_
2
g
3
(r, , ) +
1
v
4
. (30)
The quantities
1
and
2
are the same as those dened in (8a,b).
Furthermore, g
3
(, , ) is the function dened in (28).
Considering the special case when = 0, then (29) reduces to
the expression of the LCR for the double Rayleigh process given
in [6] as
N
(r) |
=0
=
r
2
2
1
2
2
_
0
_
2
r
2
+
1
v
4
v
2
e
(r/v)
2
2
2
1 e
v
2
2
2
2 dv .
(31)
E. Derivation of the ADF
We will conclude Section III with the discussion on the ADF.
The ADF T
(r), i.e.,
T
(r) =
F
(r)
N
(r)
. (32)
The CDF F
(r) =
r
_
0
p
(z) dz
=
_
r
2
K
0
() I
1
_
r
2
_
, r <
1
r
2
I
0
() K
1
_
r
2
_
, r .
(33)
From (33), (29), and by using (32), the ADF T
(r) |
=0
= 1
r
2
K
1
_
r
2
_
. (34)
This result (34) corresponds to the CDF of the double Rayleigh
process [7]. Thus, substituting (34) and (31) in (32) gives the ADF
of the double Rayleigh process.
IV. NUMERICAL RESULTS
In this section, we will conrm the correctness of the analytical
expressions presented in Section III with the help of simulations.
Furthermore, for a detailed analysis the results for the SLDS
process are compared with those of the classical Rayleigh, clas-
sical Rice, double Rayleigh, and double Rice processes. It is
important to note that the double Rice process is dened as the
product of two independent classical Rice processes, i.e., (t) =
(1)
(t) +
1
(2)
(t) +
2
1
and
2
of the LOS components of the double Rice process are
considered to be equal, i.e.,
1
=
2
= . The concept of sum-
of-sinusoids (SoS) [13] is used to simulate uncorrelated complex
Gaussian processes that make up the overall SLDS process. The
numbers of sinusoids (N
1
and N
2
) considered to generate these
Gaussian processes were selected to be 20. For the computation
of the model parameters, we selected the generalized method of
exact Doppler spread (GMEDS
q
) proposed in [19] for q = 1. The
values for the maximum Doppler frequencies f
max
1
, f
max
2
, and
f
max
3
were set to 91 Hz, 75 Hz, and 110 Hz, respectively.
The results presented in Figs. 2 4 show an excellent tting
of the analytical and the simulation results. In Fig. 2, the envelope
PDF p
(z) of the SLDS process (t) is higher than that of the classical
and the double Rice process for same value of . On the other hand,
the spread of the PDF p
(z) of
the SLDS process (t) has a narrower spread when compared
to the spread of the double Rice process for the same value of
. It should also be noted that with increasing values of the
PDF p
(r)
corresponding to the SLDS process (t) has higher maximum
values and narrower spread as compared to that of the double Rice
process for the same value of . Similarly, Fig. 5 compares the
ADF T
equal to zero.
391
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
z
P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
,
p
(
z
)Theory
Simulation
= 1 (SLDS Process)
= 2 (SLDS Process)
= 1 (Classical Rice)
= 2 (Classical Rice)
= 1 (Double Rice)
= 2 (Double Rice)
Classical Rayleigh
= 0 (Double Rayleigh)
f
= 0
Fig. 2. The PDF p
P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
,
p
)
Theory
Simulation
= 1 (Classical Rice)
= 1 (Double Rice)
= 1 (SLDS Process)
= 2 (Double Rice)
= 2 (SLDS Process) = 2 (Classical Rice)
(Double Rayleigh)
= 0
f = 0
Fig. 3. The PDF p
(
t
)
Theory
Simulation
= 1 (SLDS process)
= 2 (Double Rice)
= 0 (Double Rayleigh)
= 2 (SLDS process)
= 1 (Double Rice)
f
= f
max 1
+ f
max 3
Fig. 4. The LCR N
(
r
)
Theory
Simulation
f =0
= 1 (SLDS Process)
= 2 (SLDS Process)
= 1 (Double Rice)
= 2 (Double Rice)
Fig. 5. The ADF T