Professional Documents
Culture Documents
distributed power factor correction; group power factor correction; centralized power factor correction; combined power factor correction; automatic power factor correction.
Diagram 1
Diagram 2
Diagram 3
Starter
Starter
Starter
manently connected bank is possible only if the absorption of reactive energy is quite constant all day long. The centralized solution allows an optimization of the costs of the capacitor bank, but presents the disadvantage that the distribution lines on the load side of the power factor correction device shall be sized keeping into account the full reactive power absorbed by the loads.
C LV feeders
In centralized power factor correction automatic assemblies are normally used (see below automatic power factor correction) with banks divided into steps, installed directly in the main distribution boards; the use of a per-
11
where: EPi and EQi are the values of active and reactive energy read at the beginning of the work cycle; EPf and EQf are the values of active and reactive energy read at the end of the work cycle. To carry out a centralized power factor correction, the average monthly power factor can be obtained as previously illustrated or directly from the bills of the power supply authority.
S1 S2
Q1
Q2 P
Once the initial cos is known, Table 7.1 allows to calculate (in kvar per kW installed) the power of the capacitor bank necessary to obtain a dened power factor. In a three-phase system, the capacitor bank constituted by three capacitors having the same capacitance, can be delta- or star-connected. When selecting the connection modality, it is necessary to keep into account that with delta connection, each capacitance is subject to the supply line-to-line voltage, but, at the same level of generated reactive power, it has a value equal to 1/3 of the value it will have in case of star-connection: QcY = Qc CY = 3 C
[7.2]
Indicating by: P the installed active power 1 the phase displacement angle before power factor correction 2 the phase displacement angle to be obtained with the power factor correction the power of the capacitor bank Qc is:
Qc = (tg1 - tg2) P = K P
Table 7.1 [7.1]
In the low voltage eld, where insulation problems are less important, the delta connection is usually preferred for the capacitor bank, since it allows a smaller sizing of the capacitances of each phase.
1
. .
. .
Factor K ( kvar/kW )
nal cos
0.80 0.583 0.549 0.515 0.483 0.451 0.419 0.388 0.358 0.328 0.299 0.270 0.242 0.214 0.186 0.159 0.132 0.105 0.079 0.052 0.026 0.85 0.714 0.679 0.646 0.613 0.581 0.549 0.519 0.488 0.459 0.429 0.400 0.372 0.344 0.316 0.289 0.262 0.235 0.209 0.183 0.156 0.130 0.104 0.078 0.052 0.026 0.90 0.849 0.815 0.781 0.748 0.716 0.685 0.654 0.624 0.594 0.565 0.536 0.508 0.480 0.452 0.425 0.398 0.371 0.344 0.318 0.292 0.266 0.240 0.214 0.188 0.162 0.135 0.109 0.082 0.055 0.028 0.91 0.878 0.843 0.810 0.777 0.745 0.714 0.683 0.652 0.623 0.593 0.565 0.536 0.508 0.481 0.453 0.426 0.400 0.373 0.347 0.320 0.294 0.268 0.242 0.216 0.190 0.164 0.138 0.111 0.084 0.057 0.029 0.92 0.907 0.873 0.839 0.807 0.775 0.743 0.712 0.682 0.652 0.623 0.594 0.566 0.538 0.510 0.483 0.456 0.429 0.403 0.376 0.350 0.324 0.298 0.272 0.246 0.220 0.194 0.167 0.141 0.114 0.086 0.058 0.93 0.938 0.904 0.870 0.837 0.805 0.774 0.743 0.713 0.683 0.654 0.625 0.597 0.569 0.541 0.514 0.487 0.460 0.433 0.407 0.381 0.355 0.329 0.303 0.277 0.251 0.225 0.198 0.172 0.145 0.117 0.089 0.94 0.970 0.936 0.903 0.870 0.838 0.806 0.775 0.745 0.715 0.686 0.657 0.629 0.601 0.573 0.546 0.519 0.492 0.466 0.439 0.413 0.387 0.361 0.335 0.309 0.283 0.257 0.230 0.204 0.177 0.149 0.121 0.95 1.005 0.970 0.937 0.904 0.872 0.840 0.810 0.779 0.750 0.720 0.692 0.663 0.635 0.608 0.580 0.553 0.526 0.500 0.474 0.447 0.421 0.395 0.369 0.343 0.317 0.291 0.265 0.238 0.211 0.184 0.156 0.96 1.042 1.007 0.974 0.941 0.909 0.877 0.847 0.816 0.787 0.757 0.729 0.700 0.672 0.645 0.617 0.590 0.563 0.537 0.511 0.484 0.458 0.432 0.406 0.380 0.354 0.328 0.302 0.275 0.248 0.221 0.193 0.97 1.083 1.048 1.01 5 0.982 0.950 0.919 0.888 0.857 0.828 0.798 0.770 0.741 0.713 0.686 0.658 0.631 0.605 0.578 0.552 0.525 0.499 0.473 0.447 0.421 0.395 0.369 0.343 0.316 0.289 0.262 0.234 0.98 1.130 1.096 1.062 1.030 0.998 0.966 0.935 0.905 0.875 0.846 0.817 0.789 0.761 0.733 0.706 0.679 0.652 0.626 0.599 0.573 0.547 0.521 0.495 0.469 0.443 0.417 0.390 0.364 0.337 0.309 0.281 0.99 1.191 1.157 1.123 1.090 1.058 1.027 0.996 0.966 0.936 0.907 0.878 0.849 0.821 0.794 0.766 0.739 0.713 0.686 0.660 0.634 0.608 0.581 0.556 0.530 0.503 0.477 0.451 0.424 0.397 0.370 0.342 1 1.333 1.299 1.265 1.233 1.201 1.169 1.138 1.108 1.078 1.049 1.020 0.992 0.964 0.936 0.909 0.882 0.855 0.829 0.802 0.776 0.750 0.724 0.698 0.672 0.646 0.620 0.593 0.567 0.540 0.512 0.484
initial cos
0.60 0.61 0.62 0.63 0.64 0.65 0.66 0.67 0.68 0.69 0.70 0.71 0.72 0.73 0.74 0.75 0.76 0.77 0.78 0.79 0.80 0.81 0.82 0.83 0.84 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.90
13
Example
In a plant with active power equal to 300 kW at 400 V and cos = 0.75, we want to increase the power factor up to 0.90. In the table 7.1, at the intersection between the row initial cos 0.75 with the column nal cos 0.9, a value of 0.398 for the coefcient K is obtained. Therefore a capacitor bank is necessary with power Qc equal to: Qc = K P = 0.398 300 = 119.4 kvar The factor K can be determined also using the following nomograph2.
Figure 7.1: nomograph for the calculation of the correction power
0.60
Efficiency
cos
0.40
K
0.45 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
cos
1.00 0.99
0.50
0.55
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.75
0.80 0.85
Qc= K . P
0.70
If this motor runs at 40% of the rated power, from the following diagram of coefcient reduction, it can be obtained that: cos = cosn 0.67 = 0.52 = n 0.9 = 0.77
As shown in the gure, tracing a line segment from the value of the initial cos to the value to be obtained, the intersection of the line with the middle graduated scale, gives the value of K which, multiplied by the active power P of the load, denes the necessary reactive power Qc.
Motor load (% of the rated power) Pn% 20 1 0.95 0.90 Reduction coefficient 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50
of the rated cos of the rated efficiency
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
whereas the reactive power Qc necessary to correct the power factor and get cos= 0.9 with K=1.15 derived from the nomograph above is: Qc = K P = 1.15 5.68 = 6.53 kvar A general rule to release the power factor correction from the utilization conditions of the motor is using, for a motor with power Pn, a compensation reactive power Qc not higher than 90% of the reactive power Q0 absorbed by the motor with no load at the rated voltage Un, so that an anticipated power factor can be avoided. Besides, thanks to this measure, it is possible to reduce the disconnection overvoltage of the motor from the network; in fact, when still running, the motor may operate as a self-excited generator and may generate voltages considerably higher than the network ones [IEC 60831-1]. Considering that without load the absorbed current I0 [A] is purely reactive (sen = 1), the compensation reactive power shall be: Qc = 0.9 Q0 = 0.9 3 Un I0
1000 [kvar]
The current I0 is usually given in the documentation of the motor manufacturer. Table 7.3 shows the reactive power values to correct the power factor of some types of ABB motors, as a function of the rated power and of the number of poles.
Pn [kW]
7.5 11 15 18.5 22 30 37 45 55 75 90 110 132 160 200 250 315
Qc [kvar]
2.5 2.5 5 5 5 10 10 12.5 15 15 15 20 30 30 30 40 50
cos2
0.98 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.97 0.94 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96
I2 [A]
12.7 18.6 24.2 29.7 35.8 47.9 58.8 72.2 87.3 122.2 143.9 181.0 210.9 252.2 317.5 391.0 486.3
15
Pn [kW]
7.5 11 15 18.5 22 30 37 45 55 75 90 110 132 160 200 250 315
Qc [kvar]
2.5 5 5 7.5 10 15 15 20 20 20 20 30 40 40 50 50 60
cos2
0.96 0.96 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93
I2 [A]
12.7 18.2 25.3 30.5 35.1 47.5 59.1 71.1 86.9 122.8 145.9 174.8 209.6 257.4 320.2 399.4 507.9
Example
For a three-phase asynchronous motor, 110 kW (400 V - 50 Hz - 4 poles), the suggested value of power factor correction is 30 kvar.