Covering my tracks The misuse of an ill-gotten TV broadcasting license

Ofcom license (TLCS) Peoples Voice Broadcasting Limited

By Gary Martin Beaver aka Raymond St. Clair

THE MAN WHO HATES THE SYSTEM THEN PROMOTES THE SYSTEM AS HIS ASSURANCE TO HIS AUDIENCE THAT HE WILL BE TRANSPARENT. YOU

CANNOT MAKE THIS SHIT UP AND GET AWAY WITH IT UNLESS YOURE DAVID ICKE! TPV have just issued a statement on transparency and this is it: When we decided upon a legal structure through which to operate TPV we had to balance the need for transparency against cost and regulation. (No mention of this at all until they came under intense scrutiny. Further and this is a very important point re the regulation: David Icke and team stated that they chose the Private Limited Company vehicle because, to go down the road of a charity or foundation, they say they were advised that this would not allow them to criticise the state or government. So, there you have outright admission that TPVs intention is to do that AND, therefore, TPV is POLITICAL. Now, consider the stance of OFCOM and the fact that no politically based organisation is allowed a licence. You CANNOT be non political for one purpose of regulation and then political on the other hand. So, once more sorry David and sorry OFCOM but you are red handed and checkmated regarding this fundamental question. Lastly, TPV could have been set up as a Private Limited Company by guarantee. It wasnt. It was set up by shares. Well touch on this point later.) After taking advice we decided to incorporate Peoples Voice Broadcasting Limited as a private limited company. Principally because we did not wish to burden TPV with the increased regulatory cost and operational restrictions that apply to Charities and Community Interest Companies (CIC). (Again, the operational restrictions are those of being political and Icke has already stated this is why he chose the Private Limited Company vehicle. Again, therefore, this clashes 180 degrees with OFCOMs rules yet OFCOM are determined to ignore every evidence of TPVs political nature and Ickes involvement) However, transparency is important to us and we are happy to give the following undertakings: (It never was before so why now? People asking for transparency all through late last year were thrown off the David Icke forum, called a whole number of cheap names by TPV staff and crew including Icke and family and were determined by the TPV team as trouble-makers. I guess now that TPV have decided to acquiesce they have no choice if they wish to keep and build any sort of following these people who were vilified, are now vindicated?) 1) That no shareholder of TPV will ever take a dividend from the company.

The Two Ways You Make Money holding shares

1. An increase in share price. Over the long-term, this is the result of the market valuing the increased profits as a result of expansion in the business or share repurchases, which make each share represent greater ownership in the business as a percentage of total equity. In other words, if a business with a 10 share price grew 20% for 10 years through a combination of expansion and share repurchases, it should be nearly 620 per share within a decade as a result of these forces assuming the market maintains the same price-to-earning ratio. What you also have to bear in mind re TPV is that a) Re the balance sheet It will, in time (if all goes to Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dees plan) have a very strong asset to debt ratio simply because it will have no debt except short term (running costs). Its asset side is wonderful because it bought all its assets without any

debt whatsoever from YOUR money (this is what I have meant by money out of nothing and Icke has his own central bank and quantitative easing you cant lose when you work with other peoples money. Its exactly what our government does!). It has ZERO long term debt! No bank loans or any loans! b) P&L (Profit & Loss statement) Again, wonderful. TPV gets its income for nothing, gets its content free AND, regarding the online shop, think about it: YOU are funding the marketing to you of the t-shirts and the caps etc. These will then be sold to you and you will pay even more. So, the reality is that you may have donated say 50 and then bought a t-shirt for 15 (funding the station once more to the extent of the profit in that 15). Altogether then, you have spent 65 for a t-shirt worth, perhaps, a tenner. So the profits in the station are going to be significant when there are, again very little costs except overhead (and volunteers are cheap as was the equipment). Where are the losses to be made? Effectively nowhere (unless these people are seriously incompetent). TPVs Price to earning ratio with a balance sheet and P&L like that can only be good and increase exponentially over the years. And THAT is where the value to Icke and Tabatabai lies. Not in dividends!! Icke saying that a shareholder (of which there are only one or two and by what OFCOM says it can only be one) will not take dividends is PURE RED HERRING! Ive got news for you: BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY DOES NOT PROVIDE ITS SHAREHOLDERS WITH DIVIDENDS! Whos Berkshire Hathaway? Warren Buffet! 2. Dividends. When earnings are paid out to you, these funds are now your property in that you can either use them to buy more stock or go to Vegas and receive a few blow jobs while finding Jesus and Elvis at the Golden Nugget! Occasionally, during market bubbles, you may have the opportunity to make a profit by selling to someone for more than the company is worth. In the long-run, however, the investors returns are inextricably bound to the underlying profits generated by the operations of the businesses which he or she owns. 2) We will voluntarily (not voluntary at all. You screamed like a castrated cat before acquiescence) publish quarterly management accounts on our website, these will be reviewed by our external Chartered Accountants. Our next quarter-end will be 31st January and we aim to publish figures within two months of each quarter end. (Would those be the same accountants for David Icke Books Ltd and Lions Epoch Limited? While are these management accounts going to be of the quality and quantity of the little spreadsheet table you launched at us a few weeks ago which meant absolutely diddly squat to anyone while your audience showed its ignorance once again saying That should shut people up!. It shows you the level of intelligence a lot of your audience has David. Sad but true.) 3) As a small company we are only required to file abbreviated accounts at Companies House, however we voluntarily file full statutory accounts. (No biggie David. Every corrupt company on the planet files full statutory accounts and gets away with it. Youre swimming in the same sea Dave. Youre just trying to say youre a dolphin rather than a shark!) 4) As a small company we are not required by law to have our accounts audited and this is helpful because it reduces our costs, an annual audit would cost in the region of 12,000 plus VAT. However, our statutory accounts will be prepared by our external Chartered

Accountants and as such will carry an Acco untants report in the standard ICAEW format. (No audit eh? Well, you see, its like this Dave. You could do whatever you wished and no one would bat an eyelid at it IF you and your little chum Combataboy had dug into your own pockets with your total of 260K cash at the bank. But you didnt. Suggesting accountants reports are your way of proving your all above board is like saying you come with a government guarantee (which, in fact, you do now I come to think about it). Its like Richie saying no-one in the BBC or MTV would stoop to any malfeasance AND, considering what you yourself preach about the system in its entirety, youre then using Accountants to suggest youre all pukka? Geez a pie David! No, not P.I.E., just a mince pie will do!) 5) Our first statutory period-end is 31st October 2014 and then annually thereafter. We will publish our full statutory accounts on our website by 31st January each year, just four months after each year-end. This is much sooner than the statutory filing requirement of nine months following each year-end. (Whoopee bloody doo!) 6) We will voluntarily hold an annual stakeholders meeting, in London, within five months of our statutory period end, where we will be happy to answer questions from our sponsors, employees, volunteers and donors. We will ask a representative from our external Chartered Accountants to attend that meeting. We envisage that attendance at the meeting will be via a pre-booked ticket, sold at a small charge to cover costs, such as room hire. The precise format of the meeting will depend upon the number wanting to attend. (Note to volunteers and employees: Dont even THINK of being a whistleblower! lol Have you noticed the sheer scale of people being banned from the David Icke Forum and anywhere else run by him and the mob?) 7) Our statutory accounts will voluntarily disclose details of any remuneration paid to any shareholder or director, or to any family member of a shareholder or director. (But youre not a shareholder according to OFCOM David. Only Combataboy! Does he have a family? While, if there will ever only be ONE shareholder, i.e. him then why not just state remuneration paid to Sean ADL Tabatabai as sole shareholder and Director? or are there quiet interests for the moment Dave?) 8) Our statutory accounts will voluntarily include a note showing the number of employees and sub-contractors paid in 10,000 (annualised) bands. We will not be disclosing individual names as we consider that would be an invasion of personal privacy. (Agreed. It would be.)

Finally. Anyone notice anything? TPV and Icke are screaming from the rooftops that, if they dont hit the 400K donations they need, TPV is going to go off air. Yet, here they are telling you that this is how they are going to proceed going forward. It fits with Richie Allen saying he didnt believe they would go off air and die. Funny how on one hand you get told one thing and on another its all business as usual isnt it? ; -) Tagged with: Accountants, David Icke, Sean Adl-Tabatabai, shareholders, Statutory requirements, The People's Voice, TPV 26 comments

David Icke: Sean the businessman

Posted in Media by earthlinggb on January 9, 2014

22 Votes

THIS IS THE ENLIGHTENED ONE YOU ARE SENDING YOUR MONEY TO. BY ALL MEANS CONTINUE TO DO SO IF THIS IS WHAT YOU ASSUME TO BE ENLIGHTENMENT AND LOVE AND INFINITE CONSCIOUSNESS SPEAKING.

Yet, you wonder why I have the audacity to call you stupid if you do? Ask yourself: Would you buy Double glazing or a second hand car from a company about to go bust? Ask yourself: If, on one hand, the company was about to be dissolved due to negligence regarding filing their annual return or, on the other hand, the sole shareholder himse lf was dissolving the company so he did not have to pay his creditors and then could walk away with over 80K in the bank account and the company was about to be struck off the Company Register, would you do business with them? Would you donate any money to another business they had just started and were sole director of?

If you answered Yes to either one of these questions then, be my guest and adopt the in the corner with the D cap on your skull! Its entirely up to you. Again, Im just giving you information. Sean ADL Tabatabai: Sole Director of TPV Limited, Guardian of the ethos and exceptionally gifted businessman and David Ickes right hand man.

MAGUS MEDIA

The above simply illustrates that 1 of share capital in a company does not mean the equity figure is 1 and that is all the company shareholding is worth. As a company grows, that shareholding can become ENORMOUS! That is what Icke and Tabatabai are looking for out of TPV using YOUR money to achieve it! THAT is why they are getting hot under the collar when youre not donating! Next: Look at this -

NO tangible or intangible assets of any kind in this business. CASH at bank is 81,192 Debtors (People who own Magus money): 15,317 Add cash and debtors and you get Total current assets of 96,509 However, Sean has creditors of 90,540. NOT A GOOD POSITION TO BE IN. WHO the creditors may be is another story. A Bank? An individual? Another Corporate person? Who knows? But who cares? IF it is not a bank however and it is trade creditors of one form or another, then what can Sean do? Here is what he can do (and, certainly on paper, it would appear IS doing):

He last submitted his annual return for Magus Media in August 2012. He has lapsed in 2013. So now he has a First notification of strike off. If a company persistently fails to submit its statutory returns (the Annual Return or the Annual Accounts), Companies House MAY decide that the company is dead and will start the process of having the company struck off the Company Register. A company has to have been quite negligent to have allowed the situation to have got to that position. The decision to have the company struck off is always published in the London Gazette and an outside interested party such as a creditor can apply to have the striking off procedure suspended. However, you have a time window of six months within which to file your objection to the striking off.

In many cases, striking off is initiated by the directors of a company when they have decided that they no longer want the company. Had he submitted a return in 2013, it would have been plausible to consider that something had gone wrong in the business and at least he was attempting to fix it. But that is not what is happening here. What has happened is that he has not made a return at all for 2013. It is then, without much doubt, his intention to dissolve the company. If he achieves that without paying back his creditors (again we do not know anything about who these creditors may be) then he walks away with 81,000 in cash. Now FINAL thing is this: David Icke and Sean ADL Tabatabai have pleaded with you for donations of 300K to set up their venture when, between them with their own companies, they have cash at the bank of approx 268,000. They had it then and they have it now and yet, now, they are asking you for an additional 400,000. Im sorry folks but what I am telling you are just facts. Pure unadulterated facts. Do and think as you wish. You know what though? Call me crazy but I just have a sneaking suspicion that Icke, Sean and Sonia might all just kiss and make up. Then who do you think they would ALL turn on? Its just a plausible hunch of course! Just not outwith the bounds of possibility that is all. Imagine the avalanche of support TPV would get if they pulled that off though eh? Think about it. ADDENDUM: DEAR GOD! It just occurred to me what COULD very plausibly be happening here. I AM NOT SAYING IT IS BUT IT COULD BE, TOTALLY PLAUSIBLE AND NOTHING STOPPING IT. The CREDITOR of MAGUS MEDIA could easily be TPV Limited or it co uld be David Icke Books Ltd or Lions Epoch Ltd. Sean then folds THIS particular company and walks away with the 80K cash and TPV are not going to say a word (or Icke) because that COULD exactly be what Icke wants and/or Tabatabai has simply transferred funds as a loan to Magus media from TPV. I am NOT saying that has happened but I AM saying it could so very simply be done. Why is it he did not submit an annual report this very year? Why is he now closing it down? All after the donation drive. Studio equipment was first 20K now its 142K??? There is NO clarity in this table whatsoever (and there was never meant to be). Office rent for 7 months (or even 4 months) 1200? More like 1200 PER month but I was told while I was AT TPV it was 1000 per month! 75K for direct wages when everyone you ever hear of says they dont get paid. Except Richie recently but, trust me, that is a whole other story I can assure you. While I am positive I read somewhere that Sonia Poulton said she was getting 300 a month. Im positive I saw that somewhere but perhaps I am wrong. If it were so though, how come Sonia 300 and Richie at least 1200 (at least). Anyhow back to this bullshit in this table. The one thing that stands out like a giant sore thumb for now is the cost of studio equipment. I stated in a blog before TPV admitted it that

they got the WHOLE LOT for 20K. They then admitted that. So where the HELL has another 120K gone? Let me now ask you this: Does 81,192 fit into 120K? Yes I do believe it does. Would the costs of a very expensive trip for a couple or handful of TPV people to California cost as much as 40K? Probably not (but you NEVER know) but even if not, the rest could be made up by sundry items of spend. This STINKS! The stench is overwhelming now.

CORRECTION: The 81K cash in the bank for Magus was in there at end of August 2012. So the last comments above re transferring that figure do not apply. What STILL potentially applies however is that TPV Limited could act as a creditor to Magus. We will never know because he is closing shop. There COULD have been all sorts of transfers between Aug 2012 and now but there are NO ANNUAL RETURNS for 2013 to give us a view of that. Isnt it good timing? Tagged with: Cash at bank, Corporate equity, David Icke, donations, Magus Media, money, Sean Adl-Tabatabai, TPV. The People's Voice 35 comments

David Icke: The explanation and ONE question David. Just one!
Posted in Finance, Media by earthlinggb on January 9, 2014

18 Votes

On todays show with Richie Allen explaining the transparency situation (or total lack thereof, while you are then going to have a TPV employee provide the evidence of the ins and outs while there is no legal requirement for her to do that so, even if bullshit, theres no legal implications because it is not what TPV are producing for the authorities but lets ignore all that) you mentioned David, that you have nothing to do with TPV and are not a Director. But why did you start off as one and then remove yourself when it got hot with OFCOM? However, again that is an aside there are SO many issues David and your little faked display of emotion and being attacked from the outside by people who dont want the info out there (What info? Ill give Sonia this but not much she was the hardest hitting person in there and while she has an ego and while she is a bit on the bolshy and feminist side (as I read her), she was, of all you, the most outspoken and ready to take anyone on she has 100x more balls than you do Icke, Ill give her that) was just that, a show. Youre damned lucky you have an audience who cant read fake a mile off. But then when they believe in reptilians what does one expect? Seriously! But heres the question David: Youre no longer a Director, the little slag, fish and christian cunts and f*** off bitch Sean is (incredible how so called people believing in love, light and infinite consciousness can totally ignore this little sleaze bags language just because hes your bum chum. I mean people are actually throwing money at a guy who is blatantly coming out with this stuff) BUT WHO IS THE SINGLE (or dual?) SHAREHOLDER(S) IN THE PEOPLES VOICE PRIVATE COMPANY LIMITED? You see David? You WERE a Director but in your explanation today, you werent forthcoming with that information and, therefore, did not explain why you were and are not now? While you dropped the Directorship precisely on 23rd October 2012 when you applied for the OFCOM licence. Every piece of info you have provided your audience, every shred of transparency has not come without it being dragged and ripped out of you. Just like the 20K. You dont offer info, you begrudgingly give it when the shouts get too loud. Even then, you dont give the full story. You leave little bits out (which really are not little at all). People can read you like a book Icke. Not your core cult of course, but everyone else. I never laughed at you at Wogan because I hadnt even heard of you until around 2008/2009. I laugh

at the gullibility of your audience but I dont laugh at you (well perhaps a little I have to admit) I recognise you for what you are and one doesnt laugh at conmen.

Now what about that question that you really do keep avoiding David about the shareholding:

Now please lets not play games and silly buggers David. I realise there are many people out there who wouldnt know the first thing about how shareholding works but Im not one of them. The business has share capital. The business must have people who own that share capital. They are called shareholders. And please dont go down the route of saying Ok, yes they hold 10 of share capital, big deal because you know its a big deal David. The PEOPLE would like to know simply who owns that 10 (whatever it is) worth of share capital. Why is this so difficult for you David? Isnt this precisely the hidden tactics the very people who control the worlds corporations use? Yes, I do believe it is. But youre not one of them are you David? Youre MISTER TRANSPARENCY! Is it, perchance, the same shareholder of David Icke Books Ltd (of which you are neither a Director any longer so then its obvious one does not need to be a Director to be in control and making the money precisely the issue which arises when people say the Rothschilds are not directors of this that or the other Corporation or Bank then isnt it?). David, tell me, do you think all the people who know of you or have read some of your stuff are that dumb man? Could it be that a conversation I had personally with Sean in the early days and the competence shown in the very short time I could stand your bullshit and your teams bullshit, was just not the kind of competence you were looking for and you thought maybe just a little too switched on for our liking? Go for it son if you want to take every swipe you want Davey.

Just tell the people. Show them the Memorandum of Association and Articles of Incorporation of the Private Limited Company by shares and show them who owns those shares (par value 10? maybe?) Just show them who owns them! I KNOW you dont need to make any income from the company David. How long has Sean worked for you now while only now, as you say, he is working elsewhere too to make ends meet. What about the years before that while working for you? Youre telling your audience that you paid him for work on the David Icke website and the moderation job (and Guardian of all that is Icke what is he? Your illegitimate son? Your bum chum? Hes not that bright David so tell me, what is he? Whats he got on you?) but youre not paying him now? Hes spent years with you now Davey. What has he lived on? Yet youre telling the world that, while he is the star of it all and worked his little ass off (mein kampf? No yours babes) on TPV, it is only now he cant afford to feed himself and yet he is the sole director of the entire company? Theres a saying by the Scots David (while I am an earthling and only an earthling. I thought youd understand that of all people?): I wasnt brought up the Clyde on a scooter! So by all means, you show the ins and outs all well massaged Davey (why dont you have Ernst & Young do them for you? lol) but give your cult ONE more fundamental piece of information: WHO IS/ARE THE SHAREHOLDERS OF TPV PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY? Now, for anyone who is interested: The Peoples Voice has no subsidiary companies (it is not a parent company of other companies which would then report their financials to the parent company) BUT and this is ONLY a conjecture, I freely admit that what IF TPV Limited IS a subsidiary company itself? If that turned out to be the case then WHO is the parent company? The Parent company need not even be listed in the sense it could be an offshore shelf company. But do you believe that David Icke has handed entire control, directorship and shareholding to a little jerk like Sean ADL Tabatabai? Do you? Really? If you do Terry, I have a nice seafront bungalow you might like in Birmingham! Look at the audit thresholds. TPV would be exempt. Far less than 50 employees (they want volunteers dont they?) and gross assets 3.26M? With 20K spent on all that outdated Teddington equipment? Gross assets, once depreciation is taken into account will be pretty damned negligible). No turnover as such but your donations are actually considered income as would sponsorship and advertising money but its looking doubtful they would have a turnover of 6.5M a year and they only have to meet two out of the three criteria anyhow. IF it is a subsidiary that is.. The Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts and Audit Exemptions and Change of Accounting Framework) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/2301) amends the Companies Act 2006 so that it aligns mandatory audit thresholds with accounting thresholds, exempts certain subsidiary companies from mandatory audit and dormant subsidiaries from preparing and filing accounts.

It also makes it easier for companies who currently use IFRS voluntarily to switch from IFRS to UK GAAP when preparing their accounts. Date published: 6 September 2012 Effective date: accounting periods ending on or after 1 October 2012

Read the BIS press release

Access the legislation The Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships(Accounts and Audit Exemptions and Change of Accounting Framework) Regulations 2012.

Audit thresholds
Audit thresholds for small companies have been aligned with accounting thresholds for small companies. Small companies will therefore be entitled to an exemption from mandatory audit if they meet two out of the three mandatory criteria:

No more than 50 employees; No more than gross assets of 3.26 million; Less than 6.5 million in turnover.

Audit exemptions for subsidiaries

Subsidiaries will be exempted from mandatory audit if it fulfils all of the following conditions: (a) its parent undertaking is established under the law of an EEA state; (b) the companys shareholders must unanimously agree to dispense with an audit in the financial year in question; (c) the parent must give a statutory guarantee of all the outstanding liabilities to which the subsidiary is subject at the end of the financial year; (d) the company must be included in the consolidated accounts drawn up by the parent undertaking, which must be prepared in accordance with Directive 83/349/EEC (the Seventh Company Law Directive); (e) the use of the exemption by the subsidiary must be disclosed in the notes on the consolidated accounts drawn up by the parent; (f) the following documents must be filed by the directors of the subsidiary at Companies House on or before the date that they file the subsidiarys accounts: i. written notice of the agreement in (b); ii. a statement by the parent that it guarantees the subsidiary company under the particular section of the Act; iii. a copy of the consolidated report and accounts referred to in (d) and the auditors report on those accounts; (g) the company is not quoted within s385(2) of the Companies Act (the Act; (h) it is not an authorised insurance company, a banking company, an e-Money issuer, a MiFID investment firm or a UCITS management company, or carries on insurance market activity; and (i) it is not a trade union or an employers association.

A further 67,000 dormant subsidiary companies will be exempted from the requirement to prepare and file accounts if they fulfil these conditions. An annual return will still be required to be filed at Companies House.

Dormant subsidiaries
Dormant subsidiary companies will be exempted from the requirement to prepare and file accounts if they fulfil these conditions above. An annual return will still be required to be filed at Companies House. http://www.icaew.com/en/technical/financial-reporting/other-reporting- issues/companiesact/audit-exemptions-and-change-of-accounting-framework But lastly, to repeat: 20K for the equipment. David in his explanation video says he put his own money into buying equipment. What was it David? 20K for the equipment we know about? Or 150 for an IPOD? Not only does David Icke Books Limited have 104,000 cash at bank Ill repeat that: CASH AT BANK! but we also have a little known company which David is the sole director of, called Lions Epoch which has 83K CASH AT BANK! Now, going back to school for a moment, that makes 187K CASH IN BANK for the companies David Icke owns/controls outwit TPV. IF he had spent 20K of that cash for the equipment needed (as he told you all it was really expensive stuff and he needed 100K then 300K when, strangely, he had 187K of his own money in the bank and were not even looking at his own PERSONAL bank balances and investments), he would have been left with 167K CASH AT BANK! Still a handsome sum of cash dont you think? If I had that sort of money and I truly believed in what I was doing and KNEW what I was doing, I would have sank my own 20K for the equipment Ive made far worse investments than that with 20K I can assure you but at least I learned from them. But he came to YOU saying how desperately they needed the 300K for, substantially, the equipment and boy did they keep driving the tremendous cost of equipment and the quality of it when and please do not fall for this we did not know there was 20K of equipment at Teddington until later because, if you do, youre simply an idiot and deserve being fleeced, sorry he could have went to either of the companys banks and withdrew it without sniffing (well that might be hard in Davids case I suppose).

Adult and other education???? I thought his books were meant to be educational? lol So what could this be? Ah! I know. It could be collaboration with Daryl Hall & John Oates.. Tagged with: Adult education, Banking, David Icke, David Icke Books Limited, OFCOM, Sean Adl-Tabatabai, shareholders, shareholding, subsidiary companies, The People's Voice Limted, TPV, Transparency 27 comments

David Icke: TPV Corporate statement!

Posted in Media by earthlinggb on January 6, 2014

7 Votes

Sonia Poulton listen to her loving, absolutely committed speeches (all on youtube) about working for TPV and with David and why. Listen to what she told you she was in it for and that she was 110% committed. She was promoted heavily as THE anchor for the whole station. Now, gone! poof! But there will be a CORPORATE statement to explain her departure in the nicest possible terms and Im sure Sonia will support that statement.

Did she finally say: David, youre full of shit!? Or was it Sean? Or was it personal reasons? lol What a train wreck we have here. Anyone surprised? Addendum: Well there WAS a surprise! TPV didnt even try to smooth it all out! Well Sonia hun, after you and all the team stating that I was a pain in the arse and you yourself saying that I was just a nasty (or words to that effect) and that I didnt get my way (all total crap by the way), how does it feel to be on the receiving end when you, thinking youre of such great importance dear, get dropped like a steaming hot pile? I guess where its

YOU walking, it was for reasons of integrity right? Whereas when it was me, and you were still in your honeymoon period, you took the common good side you didnt know the details but you just jumped on the bandwagon and slated me.

Well Sonia, theres a little bit of karma for you dear! Im all for making amends and communicating realities but my impression is (and it is JUST an impression) is that youre far too big for that right? The Common good well, David did say youd all have difference of opinion but, at the end of the day, nothing changes under the sun AND the Common good is a hive mind socialist construct in THAT particular corporation. By the way, for all of you, look up the following: David Icke Books Ltd and Lions epoch Limited. The first one doesnt even have Icke as a director (like TPV then do you think Icke is making no money out of it as he says he isnt for TPV? Shareholding creates long term value for the shareholders and THAT is where the money eventually comes from wake the hell up Ickeans!) but the second one does. The thing is, the cash at bank both have together is about 160,000 YET, David Icke is asking for ANOTHER 400K from you all! lol One other thing, have you noticed how Keith Allen is in on the game now? Now ask yourself, WHO funded A lawful killing for Keith Allen? Please also note there are, as I have said before, two other companies set up as The Peoples Voice (with then slightly different names) and run by a a certain Mr M Islam. They were formed within a month of Ices. That is one HELL of a coincidence dont you think? And who funded A lawful killing again? Ho ho ho! Last thing: Re-read the criticism of Sonia by TPV (sanctioned, therefore, by David Icke if not stated by him) and then consider Davids words once more: Everytime we open our mouths etc. Really need not say more (and its no use trying to repeat it to Davids lobotomised patients): Does he feel the consequences of his actions? Wheres the empathy gone David and Sonia? Cant get along? Truth, honesty and openness and respect for all and you are both of the same mind in that sense but you cant get along? Yes, I do have a big cheesy grin on my face because this is simply hilarious and I foretold it in my first blog on the subject.

The only thing its about is the right kind of energy and seeing things our way!

The Peoples voice eh? Ok. Heres mine: I want back on the team! (Do I hell as like but its the point made here). YOU DONT HAVE A VOICE AS THE PEOPLE, YOU JUST GET A VOICE IF THEY LIKE WHAT YOU SAY! PERIOD! I wonder if that will ever come up and bite Sonia Poulton and she be asked to depart at some stage by one of Davids drivers or other lackeys. I mean if the guy can tell his wife to piss off that way then Im sure he can to anyone! And Sonia has a problem believing the shit he comes out with too:

Going with the flow put a different way. Sonia, did you make contact before deleting to ask me my version of events? No? No hun, it was easier to go with the flow. After all, I was just a volunteer. You had NO part in this and you knew nothing about it. Yet what was your action? Spineless because you certainly would not listen to my version against your new employer would you? Hilarious. Trying to suggest you are all working in an enlightened state. Acting out all the same ways everyone does. What makes it sick is you promote yourselves as better.

That honesty is only appreciated by you however Sonia when it isnt pointed at you or the people you associate with. When it is you simply delete without communication. But Im glad you respect it nevertheless. You cant complain then. ;-) http://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2013/10/12/david- icke-the-turd- in-the-punchbowl/ Perhaps there are certain people, at this point in time, how may (just may) now want to revise their assumptions of me in my original post and ongoing posts about Icke and TPV. The above quotes and comments having been taken from my original blog on the subject where, unlike the support for Sonia that I can see here and there, I had no name and was slated by

Sonia, Icke et al and all you TPV lovers were happy to jump on the bandwagon. Thank you for that. I salute your open-mindedness.

Note to Sonia: It must be your energy honey! They need POSITIVE energy at TPV (aka everything they want must be accepted, achieved and willingly given and anything else is selfishness dear) not the NEGATIVE vibes you must have been giving off. Tsk Tsk!

All those negative waves Son!

Tagged with: David Icke, Sean Adl-Tabatabai, Sonia Poulton, The People's Voice, TPV 28 comments

David Ickes Corporate sponsors

Posted in Gross stupidity within society, Uncategorized by earthlinggb on July 7, 2013

Rate This

Re-publishing this article because it was written PRIOR to my applying to TPV. I have already explained why I did and my change of heart (not so much a change of heart but thinking I need to give these guys the benefit of the doubt). So I did and guess what? I found I shouldnt have! lol
Always go with your gut instinct. I MUST remember that. But the real interesting stuff here is Tabatabais connections. Globalist ones which you will see clearly IF you research them.

Following on from my blog entitled: David Icke: A Central bank of his own (http://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2013/06/12/david-icke-a-central-bank-ofhis-own/)
Icke does it again! He takes yet another step which demonstrates this is about a business venture; a media empire?; Ickes voice not yours. Time and again, we hear the words of politicians and bankers they sound good some of the time and well justified. They say Obamacare will provide healthcare for every family without explaining the massive cost of doing so and the inability for you to opt out while the Congress and Senate do not have Obamacare. We hear him say I wont sign the NDAA and he does. We hear I will close Guantanamo and he doesnt. We hear The Bush administration must stay within the law rather than illegally wiretap and VOILA! NSA and Obama knew all about it. We hear him say This will be the most transparent Whitehouse ever and then journalists are targeted as are whistleblowers. So whats that got to do with Mr Icke? After all, I wrote the previous blog and some of the reactions of Ickes followers were as entirely expected while some were hilarious in their naivety and gullibility. Well, Mr Icke is telling you one thing while he gets 300,000 from you to start up his venture (again, HIS not YOURS hes not giving YOU an interest whatsoever in it EXCEPT that hes going to give you the truth HIS truth. And of course, his followers will accept it as the truth because, to do otherwise, would have them have to admit that where they have spoken to friends, neighbours and family and invested so much of themselves into what he says a lot of it, I admit, is fact but just enough of it is total utter bullshit and helps no-one even if it were fact! they would lose face AND, dont forget, they would then have to opt out of the Icke gang. People HAVE to have and be a member of SOME gang or other otherwise they feel lost. YET, Icke fans will say think for yourselves. I gotta laugh if a lot of them thought for themselves their heads would explode!). That thing being that this is your voice, the Peoples Voice. To a great extent

it may well be BUT thats just like the political parties who ask for their donations from THEIR sheep. Icke now has formally got himself Icke lambs (to the slaughter). These political donations to parties do the parties then truly speak for the people who donate (the little guy whos a member?) or do they speak for the large donors and the corporate donors? Ask yourself that question then give yourself the answer which you know full well! So youve donated to Mr Icke while he asks for 50 for a t-shirt and THEN wait for it! - if you actually do wish for YOUR voice to be heard on his channel (NOT yours) then hes only asking for 10,000 from you for a one half hour slot! You can learn to play guitar with a teacher for 10 per 1/2hour slot! Imagine giving a guitar teacher 10K for lessons. It would last you and hed teach you until you surpassed Jimi Hendrix or Eddie Van Halen for christs sakes! Anyhow, youve donated and get N O T H I N G except the pleasure of watching and listening to what Mr Icke decides to broadcast and you think Hey! My 10 pence contributed to that! YOU ASSHOLE! But dont worry there are a hell of a lot of you so youre in good company part of the gang as I said. After all youre awake (in your dreams!). Like George Carlin once said: Its called the American dream because youve got to be asleep to believe it. Well with Icke its If you dont believe it or me then youre not awake. Sure most of you sense or can see all that is wrong in the world b ut that doesnt mean you have any concept of being used like an evangelist uses his followers in their church where they donate and the evangelist walks away rich as hell and you are left with false hopes. So, before I wrote my last blog on this, Mr Icke hadnt mentioned a word about the donation v investment issue. Then he did. I dont propose it was due to my blog on the subject BUT the timing was immaculate. This is the video he produced to justify what he was doing: He has, since, gone on to accept Indiegogos suggestion/offer of another 10 days of Crowdsourcing funding for the TV channel venture. BUT NOW, hes taken a further step which shows his hand. Now I repeat THIS IS A GUY THAT, UP UNTIL NOW, I PRETTY MUCH TRUSTED AS BEING ON THE LEVEL (with, perhaps, a few reservations but nothing like the reservations I have now) I even shook his hand at Bilderberg 2013. However, I am quite simply stating this: David Icke and Alex Jones whether or not they fully realise it are doing a job for the globalists who are trying to turn this world on its head. The globalist want fear, they also want to show you the corruption and they want to create chaos and have you all in a mental state of confusion and an ignorantly based belief system that capitalism is bad or even socialism or any ism is bad. The fact is yes, they all are BUT this creation of chaos and the opening of Pandoras Box showing the world how corrupt the present system is and our political leaders are is part of the globalist agenda! You even KNOW this when you read and take in what you read of their own documents PLUS if you read the protocols. They want the destruction of the present political system! Im not saying it shouldnt be destroyed, I am just concerned (for good reason) that the populations of the world are not going to be able to arrive at a populist solution but simply take what is offered to them!

JONES AND ICKE ARE NOT PROFFERING ANY SOLUTIONS ARE THEY? NO THEY ARE BLOODY WELL NOT!
But what they ARE doing is profiting from your misery just as the politicians and bankers are doing, From your misery, your ignorance and your gullibility! Oh youre NOT gullible? How, then, is it that you are not demanding what Icke is offering to CORPORATES Sponsorship deals! Now Im sure that he said he didnt want Investors. Didnt he say that? Im sure he did! But, once more, you Ickians will justify and excuse (the exact same behaviour you despise from those still not awake and supporting Obama or a political party or an ism). Sponsorship doesnt mean Investor I hear some (or most) of you say. Like the guy who turned to me and said Hes asking for donations not investment not recognising what a bloody stupid, obvious thing to say considering my point in the last blog was that he was asking for donations because he did not wish to give you an investment in HIS business! So lets look more closely at what Sponsorship means: Corporate sponsorship can take many forms, but generally involves a company or organisation attaching its name to a charity, event, or other promotion in exchange for providing funds or paying a sponsorship fee. Corporate sponsorship is an effective means of advertising for many organisations, because it promotes goodwill. Companies are more likely to spend large amounts of money sponsoring highly publicised events due to the amount of publicity that can be generated and the opportunity to be affiliated with a good cause or popular event. Typically a director of development from a charitable organisation initiates the contact. They begin by approaching marketing directors of different companies to solicit funding. Rather than solicit straight donations, the charity makes the offer sweeter for the company by offering sponsorship opportunities in exchange for monetary donations. The company is more likely to donate money to a charitable cause when they have the ability to gain publicity as a result. The specific terms of the agreement are then outlined in a written contract. For example, a company is sponsoring a charity golf tournament. The terms of the agreement state that the companys name and logo will be used on all marketing and promotional materials leading up to and on the day of the event. The company will be credited as the headline sponsor for the event in all radio and television advertising leading up to the event, and the companys logo will appear on event T-shirts. The company making the donation typically becomes actively involved in the charity after the relationship has been established. For example, the president or other representative of the sponsoring company may sit on the board of directors for the charitable organisation, or a

representative from the sponsoring company takes an active role in helping to plan and organise the charitable event. Now, whether or not those sponsors actually get a say or a chair on the board, the point is that Icke is going to have to keep the message(s) on the Peoples Voice in line with the wishes of his Corporate Sponsors OR he isnt going to get any. Not only that but these sponsors actually get something of value to them out of donating (in this case it IS an investment for them and David is quite happy to allow an investment but with no financial return to them you understand right? ;- )) whereas youre not even being offered anything of value for YOUR donation! (Except that naive belief that hes going to be YOUR voice! LOL). So, once more, Icke creates money out of nothing for himself (The effective Quantitative Easing by creating hundreds of thousands of pounds from the manys small donations) and then hes inviting the sponsors in the advertisers but no matter how much money he gets it will ALL be ploughed back into the station (lets ignore that the Directors and staff essentially Icke and his family and friends will receive probably pretty good salaries out of this venture and as the sponsorship deals come through and advertising, so the salaries will increase. So no profit just damned nice salaries! But Davids going to work for free. Yes SURE he is. He wont take a salary of COURSE not hell take a 6 monthly or yearly dividend. YOU dont need to know that do you? Now, here is the Company vehicle for The Peoples Voice:

Peoples voice Directors So whos the guy with the strange name (with ADL in the middle of it? A strange quirk considering isnt it? Not that Im suggesting anything I just found it funny for obvious reasons). Well Sean is a Producer as stated and is also Ickes David Icke.com webmaster as well as his trusted partner in this venture. But he has strange connections. Now, anyone else with 47 connections on their LinkedIn profile, 2 of which (the most from one organisation) being the BBC, PLUS connections with Newstate Partners LLP (look them up) and EF Education First (first for what? Conditioning students into a globalist mindset AND which has trips to Nazi Concentration Camps in Germany just to keep the holocaust in mind no doubt) would have ANY ONE OF YOU think Ahah!! if it were anyone else but the partner

of David Icke but, since it is the partner of David Icke then there must be some simple sort of explanation (which, you can be assured, there will be Im sure).

Their roots with S.G. Warburg indeed while they advise governments and Central Banks on debt management etc. Yeah, he probably just does their websites too right? Plus the BBCs, plus EF Education First ALL globalist organisations. Sure the guy just has to make a living right?

EF Education First

Each of the circles on the outer ring represents one of his connections. This is where, if you hover over them on his LinkedIn page you find, amongst others, Newstate and EF. The large circle in the middle represents his largest number of connections with one organisation and that is only 2, both with the BBC. Sure, if Icke has a LinkedIn he might even have a couple of people as connections from the BBC who knows? after all he used to work for them (Wogan might even be one of them! ;-)) but Tabatabai having connections with them AND the other two is just a LITTLE teeny weeny bit strange. However, Im sure you dont think so so by all means carry on believing. Why do I write these blogs about Icke these days? Because, to me, hes now transparent. Im not saying hes a bad dude but I despise the way hes actually treating you, his audience. If you enjoy being treated in such a way then more power to your elbow. Personally, however, I dont think youre NEARLY awake. Just naive and FAR too trusting and gullible.

Curly Blue Media Ltd.