Introduction The prevalence of extravagant corpulence(obesity) has been elevating steadily over the last several decades and

is currently at unprecedented levels Albeit exorbitant corpulence is most commonly caused by excess energy consumption (dietary intake) relative to energy expenditure (energy loss via metabolic and physical performance), the etiology of exorbitant corpulence is highly involutes and includes genetic, physiologic, environmental, psychological, gregarious, economic, and even political factors that interact in varying degrees to promote the development of extravagant corpulence (Aronne LJ, Nelinson DS, Lillo JL, 2009)). The food, or built environment has shifted in ways that promote ingurgitating: highly caloric and fat-laden foods are not only affordable but additionally facilely accessible (i.e., numerous expeditious food restaurants, vending machines of energy dense items in schools and offices, etc.). These highly palatable foods are frequently available in sizably voluminous portions, which contribute to incremented daily caloric intake (Rolls BJ, 2003) Not only has commercial portion sizes incremented, the number of processed food items (typically high in sugar, fat, and sodium) available in grocery stores, mini-marts, and accommodation stores has skyrocketed. Today, the majority of products in grocery stores are non-perishable, highly processed, and pre-packaged foods. These products are heavily marketed not only to adults but additionally to children as well. Convenient, facile to prepare, and inexpensive, these high calorie products are frequently consumed by millions of families who are struggling to meet the economic and scheduling authoritative ordinances of todays expeditious paced lifestyle. An exploration of health promotion is envisaged on understanding of health. Like health promotion health is arduous to define as it signifies different things to different people. Health has two prevalent designations in day to day use, one negative and one positive. The most commonly quoted definition of health is that formalized by Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (Beattie, 2012). WHO, a consummate state of physical, mental and gregarious salubrity, and not merely the absence of disease or infirm. Exorbitant corpulence has become a leading public health quandary worldwide. Albeit much is kenned about the prevalence causes, and medical impacts of extravagant corpulence in developed countries, very little is kenned about its incidence and health effects in Africa. Policymakers and researchers hesitate to draw attention to exorbitant corpulence in Africa, due to the sizably voluminous encumbrance of diseases associated with acute infections and the high prevalence of hunger and malnutrition (Abay Asfaw, 2006). Exorbitant Corpulence is an aberrant accumulation of body fat, conventionally 20% or more over an individual's ideal body weight. Extravagant corpulence is associated with incremented risk of illness, incapacitation, and death (Medical dictionary). Extravagant Corpulence is not a single disease, but a variety of conditions resulting from different mechanisms and associated with sundry types and degrees of perils to determine who should lose weight, how much weight should be disoriented, and how to undertake weight loss. The associations of extravagant corpulence with age, ethnicity, gender, and socio economic status are intricate and have transmuted over time (Wang and Beydoun 2007). Albeit exorbitant

corpulence is generally more mundane among lower-SES individuals, there is some evidence that in categorical groups, this association has transmuted. Policies and interventions to reduce inordinate corpulence are appraised by understanding of its causes. The two predominant models used to expound the occurrence of inordinate corpulence? And of health more generally? are the medical model and the public health model. These models are predicated on different posits, derive from different astute traditions, and have very different implicative insinuations for policy and intervention. A major characteristic differentiating the models is that the Beattie model fixates on remedying disease, whereas the public health model concentrates on averting disease (Satcher and Higginbothom, 2008). In additament, the medical model centers on the individual patient and his or her characteristics, whereas the public health model optically canvasses a population's risk factors and the context in which they emerge. This incitement examines the underlying posits and implicative insinuations for policy and the interventions of the two predominant models used to expound the causes of exorbitant corpulence and additionally suggest the role of individuals' health demeanors in weight maintenance. Health Promotion Theories The Public Health Model The public health model differs from the Beattie model not only in its accentuation on aversion but additionally in its consideration of a wider range of causative factors. A key step in addressing health quandaries in a public health model is identifying and modifying disease vectors. The first model for this approach was John Snow's identification in 1849 of contaminated well water as the source of cholera infection and his abstraction of the pump handle to obviate its further spread. Until recent years, the identified disease vectors were toxins and pathogens carried in water, air, and food, and biological and physical sciences and epidemiology provided the scientific underpinning for identifying these vectors. Now the magnification of gregarious epidemiology has elongated this focus to factors in the convivial environment that influence disease risk (Berkman and Kawachi 2000), thereby expanding the public health science base to include the convivial and behavioral sciences. Fixate on the Environment. The public health perspective assigns responsibility for the inordinate corpulence epidemic not primarily to individuals who ingurgitate and move too minute but to the "obesogenic environment." Gregarious and economic conditions have been linked to the prevalence of exorbitant corpulence and its recent increase through their impact on the expenditure versus the intake of energy. Environmental influences have increasingly made insalubrious culls the default, or most facile, cull, which has affected both sides of the equation. Among the factors that may affect the expenditure of energy are technological advances, work patterns, and conveyance. In a review of economic changes that might explicate the growing rates of exorbitant corpulence, Finkelstein, Ruhm, and Kosa (2005) point to the impact of energy preserving

technologies and the decline in manual labor. In the Cumulated States, these conditions are coupled with longer workweeks and commute times. Americans now work longer days than Europeans do. For example, in the 1970s, the workweek was shorter in the Amalgamated States than in France, but now the American workweek is about 50 percent longer (Prescott and Carey 2004). Longer workweeks and commute times leave less time for leisure activities and lead to more repasts not eaten at home. The built environment additionally affects physical activity. Current urban de sign and convey systems favor automobile use over ambulating (Ewing, Pendell, and Chen 2002) and withal limit the opportunities for physical activity (Dannenberg et al.; Frumkin 2003). For example, in California those who spend more time in motor conveyances are more apt to be extravagantly corpulent (Frank, Andresen, and Schmid 2004; Lopez-Zetina, Lee, and Friis 2006). Neighborhood characteristics with all affect the facileness or arduousness of physical activity. Walkability is resolute by the physical and built environment (e.g., sidewalks and greenery) as well as the gregarious environment (e.g., malefaction rates, norms regarding control of canines and their waste). People living in places that are safe or are perceived to be safe and that offer convenient places to ambulate are more active (Giles-Corti and Donovan 2002; Powell, Martin, and Chowdhury 2003; Sallis et al. 2007). Likewise, residents of low-walkability neighborhoods have higher BMIs and are more liable to be relegated as extravagantly corpulent (Doyle et al. 2006; Saelens et al. 2003). The public health model additionally visually examines environmental conditions that contribute to the extravagant corpulence epidemic through their effects on food consumption. The pervasive and potent marketing of energy-dense foods has come under incrementing scrutiny. This marketing includes advertising and the design and presentation of the food itself. The supersizing of frugal sources of energy-dense food and the proliferation of expeditious-food out lets pit salubrious food culls against accomodation and getting "the most bang for your buck." The food industry's marketing of foods that exploit evolutionary programmed human predilections for sugar and fat affects food predilections and their associated caloric intake. As Nestle (2003, p. 781) observed, market forces "turn people with expendable income into consumers of aggressively marketed foods that are high in energy but low in nutritional value, and of cars, television sets, and computers that promote sedentary deportment." There is particular concern about the marketing of food like sweetened cereals, beverages, and snack foods to children (Koplan, Liverman, and Kraak 2005; Kumanyika and Grier 2006). 2. Beattie model of health promotion There are two scales that form four quadrants in the Beattie model. The horizontal spectrum is Individual to Collective, and the vertical spectrum is Authoritative to Negotiated. Extravagant corpulence is an incrementing quandary in many HICs as well as LMICs with the surge of extravagant corpulence in children. The Beattie model can be applied when designing a public health policy. Here Im going to endeavor applying it to a public health promotion

intervention that tackles this issue of exorbitant corpulence by ameliorating the diet of children in deprived areas. Authoritative Collective: Legislation to enforce expeditious food outlets to reduce salt/fat levels of their products to recommended levels, Developing local policies to designate the contents of school repasts, Developing local policies to proscribe younger years in secondary schools from going out of school for lunch, Developing partnerships with food suppliers to increment availability of fresh fruit and vegetable in the community, Subsidized packed lunches for single parent households/most vulnerably susceptible. Community Development: Incrementing cognizance of the consequences of culling insalubrious food for children, Inspiriting parents to verbalize out when they face circumscribed culls in availability of fresh fruit and vegetables, Enhearten the design of more salubrious school repasts that appeal to children. Health Persuasion: Sessions in school on salubrious foods and insalubrious foods at primary school level to increment cognizance, Inspiriting children to endeavor different vegetables and fruit through tasting sessions. Health Counselling: Offering cooking sessions for parents to learn how to cook more salubrious on a budget, cooking sessions for parents to learn how to make more salubrious packed lunches. Analysis and comparison of both theories The Bettie's 1991 model of health strategies are: Legislative actions initiated by experts or professionals to bulwark the health and welfare of a community, personal counselling fixating on the client's categorical needs working on one to one substratum and the community development fixates on interventions targeted at the community level. Health promotion is a mediating strategy between people and environment, incorporating both personal culls and convivial responsibilities in health. The program takes the expert cognizance amassed from subsisting state plans for categorical chronic disease programs (e.g. diabetes, cancer and heart disease), identifies evidence-predicated. To operationalize the model, it is auxiliary to visualize it as consisting of many interior cubes each providing a potential blueprint for action. While the model may appear static, Beattie model focuses primarily on treatment, addressing individuals' personal demeanors as the cause of their exorbitant corpulence. An underlying postulation is that as independent agents, individuals make apprised culls. Interventions are providing information and motivating individuals to modify their demeanors. (2) The public health model concentrates more on obviation and optically discerns the roots of exorbitant corpulence in an obesogenic environment awash in influences that lead individuals to engage in health-damaging demeanors. Interventions are modifying environmental forces through convivial policies. (3) There is a tension between empowering individuals to manage their weight through diet and exercise and inculpating them

for failure to do so. Patterns of exorbitant corpulence by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status highlight this tension. (4) Environments differ in their health-promoting resources; for example, poorer communities have fewer supermarkets, more expeditious-food outlets, and fewer accessible and safe recreational opportunities. People seem to have more arduousness losing weight once they are extravagantly corpulent than eschewing becoming extravagantly corpulent in the first place. That is, they require to eat fewer calories and expend more energy to lose weight than to maintain weight, and being extravagantly corpulent in it makes losing weight more arduous. A second impuissance is the model's failure to account for the epidemic's environmental drivers. The public health model complements these inhibitions by fixating on aversion and a wide range of environmental factors. Albeit addressing environmental features that affect diet and exercise is obligatory, doing so is not enough to eliminate exorbitant corpulence. Prosperous interventions at the population level for other health quandaries have worked by making the more salubrious comportment the "default" deportment. For example, providing clean dihydrogen monoxide has proved over time to be more efficacious and efficient than requiring individuals to boil dihydrogen monoxide afore utilizing it. More recently, in regard to obviating vehicular injuries, rather than convincing people to make an active cull to gird their seat belts, sensors and alarms make it unpleasant not to do so, and air bags provide passive bulwark. In the case of weight management, however, the germane demeanors cannot be addressed without the individual's active and perpetual involution. While public health approaches to inordinate corpulence include health edification aimed at transmuting individual comportment, public health solutions are increasingly looking to the epidemic's environmental drivers (Kahn et al. 2002; Kumanyika et al. 2008), Beatties approach includes legislative and regulatory betokens to abstract obstacles to salubrious eating and activity habits and/or to engender incentives to fortify them. Examples are nutrition standards for school lunch programs; vetoes on sugar-sweetened beverages in schools' vending machines; requisites for physical inculcation in schools; requisites for developers of residential subdivisions to include bicycle paths, sidewalks, and parks; and zoning regulations for expeditious-food outlets.

Conclusion As extravagant corpulence has shifted from being vigorously gregariously patterned to becoming a more pervasive epidemic, we have optically discerned the potency of the environment to inundate individual control. Even so, the environmental constraints on salubrious comportment still are more preponderant among disadvantaged populations. The inequality of opportunity for salubrious demeanor makes inordinate corpulence and other behaviorally mediated health quandaries a gregarious equity issue. A behavioral equity perspective can maintain the principle

of individual control and responsibility but one that is conditioned on adequate resources. Given that health comportments are estimated to account for approximately 40 percent of premature mortality, versus 5 percent attributable to environmental exposures associated with air and water pollution (McGinnis, Williams-Russo, and Knickman 2002), behavioral equity may be even more consequential to health than environmental equity is. The dramatic elevate in the incidence of inordinate corpulence in many countries appears to be due to the intricate inter- action of a variety of factors including genetic, physiologic, environmental, psychological, gregarious, economic, and political. Given the numerous and paramount deleterious health consequences associated with extravagant corpulence, there is an exigent desideratum for the development of highly efficacious interventions that aim to invert these obesogenic drivers, including both regime policies as well as health edification and promotion programs. Gregarious networks may withal contribute to the incrementing prevalence of exorbitant corpulence. One study showed that a persons chance of becoming extravagantly corpulent incremented by 57 % if he or she had a friend who became inordinately corpulent in a given interval (Christakis NA, Fowler JH, 2007) A homogeneous phenomenon was observed among adult siblings and espoused couples. Among adult siblings, the chance of one sibling becoming inordinately corpulent incremented by 40% if the other sibling had become extravagantly corpulent, and among espoused couples, the likelihood of one spouse becoming inordinately corpulent incremented by 37% if the other had become inordinately corpulent. The high precision of body-weight regulation is achieved by a number of integrated homeostatic systems which adjust or match the energy balance constituents. The physiological consequence of this involute machinery is to minimize exorbitant body-weight gain or loss, and represents an advantage during human evolution for survival in periods of affluence or famine. In this context, three main factors appear to participate in bodyweight maintenance: metabolic utilization of nutrients, dietary habits and physical activity. These factors are affected by susceptibility genes which in turn may influence energy expenditure, fuel metabolism, muscle fibre function and appetite or food predilections. However, the incrementing rates of exorbitant corpulence cannot be exclusively expounded by transmutations in the genetic pool, albeit genetic variants that were aforetime silent are now triggered by the high availability of energy- and fat-dense foods and by the increasingly sedentary lifestyle of modern societies.

Recommendations I additionally suggest approaches that clinicians can utilize to inspirit extravagant corpulence aversion among people, including concrete counseling strategies and practice-predicated, systems-level interventions. In integration, I suggest how clinicians may interact with and promote local and verbalize policy initiatives designed to obviate exorbitant corpulence in their communities.

References 1. (2000) Berkman, L.F., and I. Kawachi. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press. 2. (2003)Dannenberg, A.L., RJ. Jackson, H. Frumkin, R.A. Schieber, M. Pratt, C. Kochtitzky, and H.H. Tilson. The Impact of Community Design and Land-Use Choices on Public Health: A Scientific Research Agenda. American Journal of Public Health 93(9): 1500? 1508. 3. (2002)Ewing, R., R. Pendell, and D. Chen. Measuring Sprawl and Its Im pact. Smart Growth America. Available at http://www.smartgrowth america.org. 4. (2005) Finkelstein, E.A., CJ. Ruhm, and K.M. Kosa. Economic Causes and Consequences of Obesity. Annual Review of Public Health 26:239-57. 5. (2002) Giles-Corti, B., and RJ. Donovan.. Socioeconomic Status Dif ferences in Recreational Physical Activity Levels and Real and Perceived Access to a Supportive Physical Environment. Preventive Medicine 25:601-11. 6. (1987) Health Obesity, C. Wayne Callaway, Public Health Reports (1974), Vol. 102, Supplement: Women's Health. Proceedings of the National Conference on Women's Health, pp. 26-29. 7. (2002) Kahn, E.B., L.T. Ramsey, R.C. Brownson, G.W. Health, E.H. Howze, K.E. Powell, EJ. Stone, M.W. Rajab, P. Corso, and the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The Effectiveness of Inter ventions to Increase Physical Activity: A Systematic Review. Amer ican Journal of Preventive Medicine 22(4S):73-107. 8. (2005) Koplan, J.P., C.T. Liverman, and VI. Kraak, eds.. Preventing Child hood Obesity: Health in the Balance. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. 9. (2006) Kumanyika, S.K., and S. Grier. Targeting Interventions for Ethnic Minority and Low-Income Populations. The Future of Children l6(l):187-207. Kumanyika, S.K., E. Obarzanek, N. Stettler, R. Bell, A.E. Field, S.P. Fortmann, B.A. Franklin, et al. 2008. Population-Based Prevention of Obesity: The Need for Comprehensive Promotion of Healthful Eating, Physical Activity, and Energy Balance: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association Council on Epi demiology and Prevention, Interdisciplinary

Committee for Pre vention (formerly the Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science). Circulation 118(4):428-64. 10. (2002) McGinnis, J.M., P. Williams-Russo, and J.R. Knickman. The Case for More Active Policy Attention to Health Promotion. Health Affairs 2l (2):78-93. 11. (2008) Nestle, M. The Ironic Politics of Obesity. Science 299(5608):781. Available at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/299/5608/781 (accessed September 13,). 12. (2004) Prescott, E.C., and W.P. Carey.. Why Do Americans Work So Much More Than Europeans? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 2 8(1): 2-13. 13. (2009) Reducing Obesity: Motivating Action while Not Blaming the VictimAuthor(s): Nancy E. Adler and Judith StewartSource: The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 87, No.1, pp. 4970 14. (2008) Satcher, D., and E.F. Higginbothom. The Public Health Approach to Eliminating Disparities in Health. American Journal of Public Health 98(3)'400-403. 15. (2006), The Effects of Obesity on Doctor-Diagnosed Chronic Diseases in Africa: Empirical Results from Senegal and South Africa, Abay Asfaw, Journal of Public Health Policy, Vol. 27, No. 3 pp. 250-264. 16. (2007) Wang, Y, and M.A. Beydoun.. The Obesity Epidemic in the United States? Gender, Age, Socioeconomic, Racial/Ethnic, and Geographic Characteristics: A Systematic Review and Meta Regression Analysis. Epidemiologic Reviews 29:6-28. 17. (2012, 04). Beattie's Model in Health Promotion. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 04, 2012, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Beattie%27s-Model-In-Health-Promotion-

985364.html.
18. http://unhealthyreflections.wordpress.com/2013/01/07/the-beattie-model-applied-obesity/ 19. http://unhealthyreflections.wordpress.com/category/health-policy-2/