Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quantitative constraints on 1. Timing of age of solar system formation 2. Formation of the Earth 3. Genesis of terrestrial units: continents, ocean, mantle, core 4. Climate variability over Earth history What has isotope geochemistry done for you lately? 5. Quantitative timescales a. Hominid evolution b. Landscape evolution Ice Sheet Retreat c. 6. Cultural evolution: 14C dating
Isotope Geochemistry Provides fundamental observational constraints on Earth and solar system processes through time A few examples: Quantitative constraints on 1. Timing or age of solar system formation 2. Formation of the Earth 3. Genesis of terrestrial units: continents, ocean, mantle, core 4. Climate variability over Earth history 5. Quantitative timescales a. Hominid evolution b. Landscape evolution Ice Sheet Retreat 6. Cultural evolution: 14C dating
knowledge of relative decay kinetics linear correlation between systems (i.e., meteorites and Earth) 4.55x109 years
Patterson (1956)
Terrestrial isotopic Fractionation Line ! Common correlation between 17O/16O ratios and 18O/16O ratios measured in lunar rocks and Earth rocks Common source ! planetary impact formed the moon What chemistry/physics is behind this logic?
Earth
! 143Nd
Constraints on: ! Large scale chemical differentiation in mantle ! Timescales ! Models of Earth evolution
DePaolo, 1988
Questions: ! How do observable 18O/16O ratios relate to temperature? ! What chemistry/physics is involved? ! What assumptions are involved?
A W
of: temperature and 18O/16O of water ! global ice volume Epstein (1953) D/H ratio in ice Temp
18O/16O
Temp
18O/16O
Isotopic records allow us to place more recent records into a larger context: Q What is natural variability? What is forced by industrial activity? Where is this headed? Inferred relative temperature (oC)
Is this normal ?
Multiple temperature proxy records from: ! tree rings, ! isotopic composition of snow, coral, stalactites ! and other sources IPCC Climate Change, 2007
! 40Ar
! Knowledge of decay kinetics ! Timing of volcanic eruptions ! Quantify sediment scale ! Antiquity of hominid fossils
Homo erectus: ~1.8 million years ago Koobi Fora Formation, Lake Turkana McDougall and Harrison, 1999
Radiocarbon dating Quantify the age of C-containing organic materials up to ~62,000 years: Archaeological sites nuclear reaction in atmosphere:
14N
+ n ! 14C + p
! 14N
West Antartica Ice Sheet Holocene Deglaciation Stone (2003) Ice surface lowering over time
E A S R s s D H
Glacial erratic
Text books:
Chart of the Nuclides, Lockheed Martin (Required): $25 check give to D. Shuster Check payable to UC Regents, memo = EPS 124/224 Radiogenic Isotope Geochemistry, A.P.Dickin (Required): ~$50 used paperback (Amazon) Introductory Nuclear Physics, K.S.Krane (Recommended): ~$75 used hardback (Amazon) Principles of Stable Isotope Distribution, R.E.Criss (Recommended): ~$20 used (Amazon)
Chart of Nuclides
Protons
Neutrons
! ! !
Potassium uranyl sulfate K2UO2(SO4)2 H2O Some kind of radiation from the salt blackened photographic plate (which penetrated paper, glass and other solid matter) Intensity of radiation " amount of uranium
! ! ! ! ! ! !
Rays are generated by uranium Natural U-ore is more radio-active than pure Uranium Intensity of radiation shown to be a function of time Isolated other radioactive elements: polonium, radium, actinium First use of the word radio-active (Curie & Curie, 1898) Samples with concentrated Ra heated up (100 cal/hour/g Ra) Thorium is radioactive
Rutherford and Thomson (1899) ! ! ! ! ! Studied the nature of rays Radioactivity causes ionization in air Rutherford discovers two types of radiation (Rutherford, 1899) Terms # and $ radiation Both types of radiation absorbed by Al foil ! # rays stopped by thin foil ! $ rays only stopped with much thicker (x100) foil
Bragg (1904) ! introduces the concept of range for " particles, finding that " particles emitted from different elements have different ranges
Incident intensity
!o
! (d)
d
foil
!o
Intensity ! (d)
Incident intensity
!o
d
foil
!o
Intensity ! (d)
Rutherford and Thomson (1899) ! ! ! ! ! Studied the nature of rays Radioactivity causes ionization in air Rutherford discovers two types of radiation (Rutherford, 1899) Terms # and $ radiation Both were absorbed by Al foil ! # rays stopped by thin foil ! $ rays only stopped with much thicker (x100) foil Rutherford postulates an exponential law for $ rays absorption
Where: ! = intensity through d !" = incident intensity = absorption coefficient d = foil thickness
I = I 0e
! d
Bragg (1904) ! introduces the concept of range for # particles, finding that # particles emitted from different elements have different ranges
Rutherford-Soddy transformation hypothesis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Noticed bursts in electrometer readings, other than radiation Could condense a high atomic weight gas (Radon)
then its radioactivity diminished rapidly (time scale)
Radioactivity is accompanied by the transformation of atoms - uranium-x was discovered (234Th) - thorium-x was discovered (224Ra) Radiation is a by-product of transformations Transformation is at a subatomic level
dN = "!N dt
# of parent atoms
dN = !#dt N
N (t2 ) t2
N ( t1 )
"
d ln N = ! " #dt
t1
ln N (t 2 ) ! ln N (t1 ) = !# (t 2 ! t1 ) N (t 2 ) = e ! # (t 2 ! t1 ) N (t1 )
decay rate (!N) is called activity
Radioactive Change
Geiger and Marsden (1909) Scattering experiment not consistent with model The testable hypothesis: If uniform (+) charge density in an atom: Predicted observations:
If concentrated charge:
Geiger and Marsden (1909) Scattering experiment not consistent with model
#&
Rutherford scattering experiments ! If positive charge uniformly distributed in foil ! no scattering is expected. ! Conversely, if charge is non uniform ! the more scattering scattered ions detected here
)&
gold foil
!! Large scattering angles ) were too frequently observed inconsistent with the diffuse charge model !! Occasionally, ) = 180o was observed! It wasas if you fired a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you. (!)
Rutherford scattering experiments ! If positive charge uniformly distributed in foil ! no scattering is expected. ! Conversely, if charge is non uniform ! the more scattering scattered ions detected here
)&
gold foil
Rutherford (1911) Positive charge is concentrated at a point (later named nucleus) Predicted scattering angles using this model and classical physics
n0 = # incident " particles n(!) = # " particles scattered at angle ! t = thickness of scattering foil N = # nuclei/unit volume in foil r = distance between the scattering point and the photo plate M" = mass of alpha v" = velocity of alpha Z = atomic # of scattering material Za = 2 e = unit charge
The Rutherford model ! Was confirmed by systematic scattering experiments ! Led to the determination of nuclear charges ! Led to the realization that the atomic # of an element was equal to its nuclear charge (and # of electrons)
Size of the nucleus ! Electrostatic repulsion predicts that the radius of the nucleus must be smaller the distance of closest approach of the " particles
# particles
nucleus distance d
when the # is at at the distance d from the nucleus, it has a potential energy of:
2 Ze 2 d
! for an # scattered at 180, the potential energy at its turn around point is equal to its original kinetic energy, T": 2 Ze 2 T! = d 2 Ze 2 d= T!
Example:
e2 4!" 0