Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Laser Pointer
Bluetooth
Laser Plummet
2 and 5
Windows
CE Touchscreen
SURVEY PRO
| Silverlight
| JavaScript
Copyright 2009 ESRI. All rights reserved. ESRI, the ESRI globe logo, ArcGIS, and www.esri.com are trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of ESRI in the United States, the European Community,
or certain other jurisdictions. Other companies and products mentioned herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective trademark owners.
With ArcGIS
Web Mapping APIs, you can create and deploy GIS applications that are best suited for
your environment. To save time and resources while learning how to use these APIs, ESRI offers live
samples, training seminars, sample applications, and free maps and GIS tasks such as geocoding and
routing. Discover how ArcGIS Web Mapping APIs can deliver mapping and GIS functionality in your
Web applications; visit www.esri.com/mappingapis.
For ESRI locations worldwide, visit www.esri.com/distributors.
Czech Republic
www.arcdata.cz
Denmark
www.informi.dk
Estonia, Latvia,
and Lithuania
www.hnit-baltic.lt
Finland
www.esri-fnland.com
France
www.esrifrance.fr
F.Y.R.O.M.
www.gisdata.hr
Germany
www.esri-germany.de
Georgia
www.geographic.ge
Greece and Cyprus
www.marathondata.gr
Austria
www.synergis.co.at
Belgium and Luxembourg
www.esribelux.com
Bosnia and Herzegovina
www.gisdata.hr
Bulgaria
www.esribulgaria.com
Croatia
www.gisdata.hr
Hungary
www.esrihu.hu
Iceland
www.samsyn.is
Israel
www.systematics.co.il
Italy
www.esriitalia.it
Malta
www.geosys.com.mt
Moldova
www.trimetrica.com
The Netherlands
www.esrinl.com
Norway
www.geodata.no
Poland
www.esripolska.com.pl
Portugal
www.esri-portugal.pt
Romania
www.esriro.ro
Russia
www.dataplus.ru
Slovak Republic
www.arcgeo.sk
Slovenia
www.gisdata.hr
Spain
www.esri-es.com
Sweden
www.esri-sgroup.se
Switzerland
www.esri-suisse.ch
Turkey
www.esriturkey.com.tr
Ukraine
www.ecomm.kiev.ua
UK/Ireland
www.esriuk.com
BD NASA is committed to ensuring that
MODIS imagery is available for as long as pos-
sible. In fact, NASA continues to make
improvements to the MODIS data products
and to the public access of those products.
The NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP)
which is scheduled for launch in January 2011
and the operational NPOESS program are
in the queue to ensure that these daily, lower
resolution observations are available in the
long-term.
GP Turning next to your new position as
a program manager within NASAs Applied
Sciences Program, your published respon -
sibilities will once again include agricul-
ture. Presumably this will again involve
you in the monitoring and forecasting of
both global and domestic agricultural pro-
duction, but not directly as is being done
in USDA/FAS. So which specific aspects of
agriculture will you be focussing on in
your new role at NASA?
decade? Will the work on water resources
be carried out in-house within NASA or
will this be contracted out to be executed
by universities, by other federal agencies
or by private consultancies?
BD Global water resources are a key issue
for our program. We understand that the
water cycle is global in scope, but it clearly
has regional impacts and responses that vary
across landscapes. NASA has numerous
assets both in-orbit and scheduled for the
future that focus on the water cycle issues.
One example of how NASA is addressing
water cycle science is the Soil Moisture Active
& Passive (SMAP) mission. SMAP is utilizing
passive and active sensors together to mea-
sure soil moisture and it has an applications
working group that is defining how to use the
science data from this mission for applications
before the instrument is launched. As with
all other NASA applied sciences, help from
NASA centers, universities, federal agencies
BD My new role will allow me to work with
NASA earth scientists and other researchers
to identify, develop and demonstrate how
NASA missions and science can be utilized by
agriculture decision makers. There are numer-
ous policy issues surrounding agriculture
today such as water resources, climate change
and international trade. The challenge is to
work with those agencies and programs that
need to make critical agriculture decisions and
determine how (and if ) NASA missions and
science can be used to help them. One key
issue is how do we use global agriculture
monitoring data and technology to address
applications that are often very local or
regional in scope.
GP Your responsibilities within the
Applied Science Program also include
water resources. Again does this involve
the monitoring of these resources on a
global scale using NASAs satellites? How
will this be carried out during the coming
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
I nt er vi ew
31
October/November 2009
An artists impression of the NPOESS (National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System) which will form the basis of the next generation of low
earth orbiting environmental satellites and will act as a replacement for both the U.S. Department of Defense DMSP satellites and the NOAA Polar Operational
Environmental Satellites (POES) satellite series.
and the private sector is being
sought to provide the best
applications possible.
GP As the current presi-
dent of the ASPRS in the
year when the Society cele-
brates its 75th anniversary,
how do you see it develop-
ing in the future, given the
ever changing and rapidly
developing digital imaging
and scanning technologies
that are being used for data
acquisition in both
photogrammetry and
remote sensing?
BD In our 75th year, ASPRS
members and the science and
technology that they represent
are more important than ever.
My message when I took over
as President of ASPRS was that
monitoring and measuring
change is of highest value
when uncertainty in general is
also high. For example, as
demands on our Earths
resources continue to grow and the impact of
climate change becomes more visible, while
remaining uncertain as to cause or effect,
ASPRS members are extremely critical in
ensuring that we are accurately and reliably
measuring this change. ASPRS members are
also key to understanding how and why this
change is occurring. Furthermore our collec-
tive resultant findings are vital in identifying
alternative solutions and in supporting effec-
tive monitoring regimes to respond to this
critical global challenge.
GP While the photogrammetric side of
ASPRS includes a large number of com-
mercial air survey and mapping compa-
nies who are sustaining members of the
Society and who supply a substantial part
of the membership, it is noticeable that
the number of universities in the U.S. that
offer higher-level photogrammetry pro-
grammes has declined markedly over the
last 10 to 15 years. Is the Society plan-
ning to try and redress this situation so
that the professionals (e.g. technologists
and managers) that will be required by
the industry in the future will be available
when the present generation of experi-
enced staff retire?
32
I nt er vi ew
October/November 2009
(a) The SMAP (Soil Moisture Active-Passive) satellite will use a combined microwave radiometer and high-resolution radar in conjunction with a shared mesh
antenna to measurethe soil moisture and freeze-thaw state of the ground. This information will enable improvements to be made in weather, flood and drought
forecasts and in predictions of agricultural productivity.. (b) This diagram shows the measurement geometry and ground coverage of the radiometer and radar
imaging combination that will be mounted on the SMAP satellite.
[a]
[b]
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
33
October/November 2009
BD There are many factors affecting the current situation related to pho-
togrammetry education, and we probably cant address all of them here.
However, ASPRS is most definitely concerned with the decline in the number
of large photogrammetry programs in the U.S. Indeed ASPRS staff members
have worked with our colleagues at the American Congress on Surveying and
Mapping (ACSM) and through the Accreditation Board on Engineering and
Technology (ABET) [ACSM is the ABET member society for these curriculum
areas] to ensure the continued viability of photogrammetric education in the
U.S. We are especially concerned that the U.S. programs awarding advanced
degrees in this area are suffering, which leaves the nation with a potentially
critical strategic shortage of native-born talent a situation which has recent-
ly caught the attention of some of the largest government agencies involved
with this discipline. In addition, we have been called upon to provide advice
and consultation to several institutions hosting four-year photogrammetry
programs as they work to address related issues.
More generally, our highest priorities at ASPRS include our student members,
along with the development of a highly trained workforce to meet the global
challenges we have just discussed. The growth in the number of student
chapters in recent years, our robust awards and scholarships program (fund-
ed through the ASPRS Foundation), and the many related student outreach
activities have been notable successes due to the efforts of my predecessors
and the ASPRS staff. We continue to adapt our certification program to be
sure that we are meeting the needs of the industry, and the photogrammetry
certifications are by far the largest group. We are also working with 2-year
post-secondary programs as well as developing material for the growing num-
ber of interdisciplinary programs that integrate photogrammetry and remote
sensing into solutions-oriented curricula (e.g. GIS). This will be a big chal-
lenge for us as the current generation retires, but I am convinced that ASPRS
is ready and accessible, and will continue to meet the needs of our nations
image-based workforce.
For more information regarding the activities
of NASA and USDA in global agricultural monitoring,
please see the following Web sites:-
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/
NasaNews/Agriculture2009
www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer
http://jointmission.gsfc.nasa.gov
http://smap.jpl.nasa.gov
www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/glam.cfm
www.fews.net
Gordon Petrie is Emeritus Professor of
Topographic Science in the Dept. of
Geographical & Earth Sciences of the University
of Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. E-mail - Gordon.Petrie@ges.gla.ac.uk
Laser Scanners for , mobile,
terrestrial & industrial applications
airborne
LASER MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS
RIEGL
RIEGL USA Inc.,
Orlando, Florida,
info@rieglusa.com
RIEGL Japan Ltd.,
Tokyo, Japan,
info@riegl-japan.co.jp
RIEGL LMS GmbH,
A-3580 Horn, Austria,
office@riegl.co.at
www.riegl.com
Innovation in
3D
RIEGL
Geomaat is an independent surveying company founded in 2002. From its head office in
Groningen, the Netherlands, the company performs a variety of different projects, from mea-
surements on the ground, road and water construction, and profile measurements for water
boards to GPS volume definitions and topographic measurements for communities and devel-
opers.
Geomaat was the first company in the world to buy the Streetmapper 360 system. This is a
surveying system that can perform 360-degree laser scans from a moving car. Complete
motorways and urban areas can be surveyed at speeds of more than 100 kilometers per
hour.
Director Jolle Jelle de Vries explains why the company bought this system: Right from
the start Geomaat has been engaged in innovative solutions, and every year we look for
new methods and equipment that can sustain our work. Three years ago we started with
surveying 3D data using GPS stations that were mounted on quads, so we already had
experience with mobile surveying systems. In 2008 we first came into contact with the
supplier of Streetmapper 360, the English company 3D Laser Mapping, and after going
through trial trajects in May and June we bought the system in November. Where the former
Streetmapper solution made use of four stationary scanners, our system uses two rotating laser
scanners. Also, our system offers more options because the resolution is higher than the
previous version.
34
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
The acquisition of survey data is a time-consuming thing in itself, but it can be even more difficult
when the data has to be acquired in a place that has a lot of traffic. Dutch company Geomaat found
a solution that not only reduces surveying time, but also is suitable for heavily trafficked areas.
By Lambert-Jan Koops
Streetmapper 360 for Acquiring Topography
Geomaat Acquires 3D Data
without Traffic Obstruction
Scanners
Streetmapper 360 contains not only
two rotating laser scanners, but also
a GPS module so that the position
of the system can be defined. In
addition, the entire system is provid-
ed with a delay navigation system.
De Vries explains why this is need-
ed: The scanners are mounted on
top of the car and scan the sur-
rounding environment. If the car is
on a hill or if the road surface is not
bumpy, this can cause large devia-
tions in the surveying data. The scan-
ners can survey objects within a
radius of 300 meters, so if the laser
beams are wired underneath a small,
distorted angle, this causes a discrepancy of a few meters at the fringe
of the surveying circle. The delaying navigation system is able to keep
track of these deviations so that scan data can be corrected.
Streetmapper 360 can survey 600,000 points per second. The resolu-
tion of the surveyed trajects depends, of course, on the speed of the
car and varies from 5 millimeters to 5 centimeters. For projects on pub-
lic roads it is desirable to have another car drive along in the normal
traffic flow to avoid causing a nuisance. Surveying can be performed at
a speed between 80 and 100 kilometers per hour and with an average
point density of around 400 per square meter.
A32
One of the projects that Geomaat has already carried out with the
Streetmapper 360 system is surveying an 11 kilometer course on the
A32 between Steenwijk and Wolvega. The motorway has bumps on the
full width of the track, particularly in the northern direc-
tion, with severe rutting. This is caused by a bro-
ken foundation that is not supporting
the road. The only right solution
to this problem is to remove the road
surface and foundation completely
and reconstruct this part of the
motorway. The Dutch water board will
be starting these activities based on
a design supplied by Geomaat. De
Vries explains what the company did
here: First we surveyed the traject
with Streetmapper. This yielded a file
of 50 million points in different cate-
gories that we post-processed and
categorized in MicroStation. The data
was classified into different cate-
gories such as soil, art works and
high and low vegetation. Also, the
captured data was checked because
we surveyed the height with the aid
of leveling. This yielded a standard deviation of 8 millimeters.
When the models were created, they were loaded into AutoCAD Civil
3D where length profiles and cross sections were created. Also, a new
road design was created by Geomaat employees. This fits in with
Geomaat activities, De Vries explains: We are not an engineering com-
pany that creates a completely new design, but its easy for us to con-
vey improvements. This means that we not only removed bumps in the
course, but we also had a look at the super-elevation of the entries
and exits. Also, we looked for a solution that requires a minimum
amount of earth moving, so the activities can be carried out optimally.
Video Imagery
The 3D model created by Geomaat will be used later for driving build-
ing machinery. When the work has been finished the Streetmapper 360
will survey the course again, and after that the surveyors will check if
the activities have been carried out correctly based on the data.
To make the digital activities easier Geomaat has provided video
imagery data captured with digital video cameras that are also part of
the Streetmapper system. The video images are directly linked to the
digital model so every view from the surveying vehicle can be verified
on the screen when post-processing. This, however, is only meant as a
visual support for the data. De Vries: It may be clear that the camera
images are never meant to be used as a foundation for measure-
ments. The data are more reliably available in the 3D model
we provide on the basis of surveying data.
Internet: www.geomaat.nl
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
Ar t i cl e
35
October/November 2009
Using RapidEye Data without Ground Control
A fully automated high-speed system to produce
high-accuracy multispectral orthos and mosaics for optical
data from all over the world is now possible with the
availability of RapidEye satellite data and graphic
processing unit processor. Time-sensitive applications,
such as agricultural or disaster management, can now
access high-accuracy orthos as soon as the data
is available.
By Philip Cheng and Jiri Sustera
RapidEye Satellites
RapidEye is a constellation of five satellites launched simultaneously
on August 29, 2008. Each satellite measures less than one cubic meter
and weighs 150 kg (bus + payload). On board digital recorders store
image data until the satellite passes within range of the ground receiv-
ing station located in Svalbard, Norway. The satellites have a global
revisit time in 1 day and it can image more than 4 million km2 every
day.
Each satellite carries a pushbroom multi-spectral sensor, capable of col-
lecting image data in five distinct bands of electromagnetic spectrum
at GSD 6.5 meters: Blue, Green, Red, Red-Edge, and Near-Infrared.
RapidEye's satellites are the first commercial satellites to include the
Red-Edge band, which is sensitive to changes in chlorophyll content.
Additional research will be necessary to realize the full potential of the
Red-Edge band, however, preliminary studies show that this band can
assist in monitoring vegetation health, improve species separation and
help in measuring protein and nitrogen content in biomass.
RapidEye Applications
There are many potential applications for RapidEye satellites: (1)
Agriculture Field boundary extraction, crop identification, acreage
determination, yield forecasting, management and harvest zone map-
ping, damage assessment and risk management for agricultural insur-
ances, etc. (2) Forestry Tree species separation, stem volume estima-
tion, infestation detection, volume estimation, harvest mapping, etc.
(3) Security and emergency Disaster management after tornadoes,
hurricanes, drought, floods, landslides, hail, fires, earthquakes, etc. (4)
Environment Change detection for any environmental purpose. (5)
Spatial Solutions Background imagery services, updating road net-
work databases, ortho-image maps, etc. (6) Energy and infrastructure
Pipeline monitoring, land cover classification, clutter mapping, etc.
Further information on RapidEye applications can be found at
http://www.rapideye.de.
When comparing with other optical satellites, the biggest advantage of
RapidEye is the speed to provide high-resolution multispectral satellite
imagery within 12-48 hours because of the constellation of five satel-
lites. The second advantage, which will be described in this article, is
the ability to generate high accuracy orthos and mosaics using no
ground control information.
36
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
Figure 1: Overview image of RapidEye Irvine data
Automated High-Speed High-Accuracy
Orthorectification of
RapidEye Data
For most applications, the
data must be corrected to a
map projection before it
becomes useful; this correc-
tion process is called
orthorectification or geomet-
ric correction. The process
requires the use of a rigor-
ous geometric model,
ground control points
(GCPs), and a digital eleva-
tion model (DEM). The col-
lection of GCPs presents a
significant problem for
orthorectification. An existing
source of GCPs may not be
available. It is often too
expensive to collect new
points, especially for areas
inaccessible by road. In
some cases, the collection of
GCPs is made almost impos-
sible by local conditions
such as floods or earth-
quake.
The RapidEye satellite plat-
forms have been constructed
by Surrey Satellite
Technology Ltd (SSTL). Each
satellite uses a star tracker
known as the Altair HB. It
was developed as an alter-
native low cost, high accura-
cy, spacecraft attitude deter-
mination and control sensor.
The accurate attitude infor-
mation could potentially help
to orthorectify the RapidEye
data accurately to any map
projection without the need
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
Ar t i cl e
37
October/November 2009
Figure 3: Full resolution orthorectified RapidEye image of Irvine corrected without GCPs
overlaid with Google Earth
Figure 2: Full resolution orthorectified RapidEye image of Irvine corrected without GCPs
overlaid with USGS 1:24000 vectors
Orthorectification and Mosaicking
for GCPs. This would be an immense benefit to numerous applications
where accurately-corrected orthos are needed as soon as possible. In
this article, we will use different RapidEye data to test and explore
orthorectification accuracy without the use of GCPs.
RapidEye Test Data
RapidEye Standard Image Products can be purchased in two product
levels, depending on the task at hand. (1) RapidEye Basic Product
(level 1B): This data has had radiometric and sensor corrections applied
to it, as well as on-board spacecraft attitude and ephemeris. (2)
RapidEye Ortho Product (level
3A): Offers the highest level pro-
cessing available. Radiometric,
sensor and geometric correc-
tions have been applied to the
data. These have been rectified
using a DTED level 1 SRTM DEM
or better, and with appropriate
GCPs can meet an accuracy of
6m 1-sigma (12.7 CE90). The
highest accuracy that can be
achieved by these products
meets 1:25,000 NMAS stan-
dards.
Most users would prefer to use
Level 1B data because they can
use their own GCPs and DEMs
to generate orthos. In this arti-
cle we will test the correction
accuracy of 1B data with and
without GCPs. Level 1B data were obtained for the following areas: (1)
Irvine, California, USA. (2) Phoenix, Arizona, USA, and (3) Zlin and
Koprivnice regions, Czech Republic.
Geometric Correction Method and Software
Each RapidEye 1B data is supplied with 5 bands in NITF format. In addi-
tion, rational polynomial coefficients (RPC) are provided with the data,
which enables the use of RPC model to orthorectify the data. More
details about the RPC model can be found in the paper written by
Grodecki and Dial (Block Adjustment of High-Resolution Satellite Images
Described by Rational Functions
- PE &RS January, 2003). Since
biases or errors still exist in the
RPCs, the results can be post-
processed with a polynomial
adjustment and several accurate
GCPs.
The latest version of PCI
Geomatics OrthoEngine soft-
ware was used for this testing.
This software supports reading
of the data, manual or automat-
ic GCP/tie point (TP) collection,
geometric modeling of different
satellites using Toutins rigorous
model or the RPC model, auto-
matic DEM generation and edit-
ing, orthorectification, and
either manual or automatic
mosaicking.
38
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
Figure 5: Full resolution orthorectified RapidEye Phoenix data corrected without GCPs
overlaid with Google Earth
Figure 4: Full resolution orthorectified RapidEye Phoenix data corrected without GCPs overlaid with USGS 1:24000 vectors
Irvine, California
The data has a coverage of approximately 76 km by 230 km. Figure 1
shows an overview of the image. 14 GCPs were collected from USGS
1:24000 scale maps and 0 order RPC adjustment was used. The root
means square (RMS) GCP residuals were about 3.6m in X and 7.0m in Y
with a maximum residual of 6.5m in X and 11.5m in Y. The results were
similar when using 1st order RPC adjustment. When all the GCPs were
changed to independent check points (ICPs), the RMS ICP errors were
about 5.7m in X and 7.5m in Y with
a maximum error of 11.7m in X and
13.6m in Y. Although the errors are
slightly higher when no GCPs were
used, the RMS errors are still close
to the resolution of the sensor, i.e.,
6.5m. The accuracy of the GCPs
using 1:24000 scale maps could also
contribute the errors in the result.
Figure 2 and 3 show examples of the
orthorectified image corrected with-
out GCPs overlaid with 1:24000
USGS vectors and Google Earth,
respectively.
Phoenix, Arizona
A block of three 1B RapidEye data
set with overlaps was tested in this
case. Each image has a coverage
of approximately 76 km by 162 km. 14 DGPS GCPs with sub-meter
accuracy were collected from the data set. The RMS GCP residuals were
about 2.3m in X and 2.1m in Y with a maximum residual of 3.3m in X
and 4.7m in Y. When all the GCPs were changed as ICPs, the RMS ICP
errors were 3.5m in X and 4.2m in Y with a maximum error of 6.3m in
X and 6.5m in Y. Hence, RMS errors when no GCPs were used are with-
in the resolution (6.5m) of the sensor in this case. Figure 4 and 5 show
examples of the orthorectified image corrected without GCPs overlaid
with 1:24000 USGS vectors and
Google Earth, respectively.
Czech, Republic
RapidEye 1B data set of Zlin and
Koprivnice regions were acquired
on June 14, 2009. The size of each
scene was around 76 km by 60 km.
The GCPs were collected from 0.5m
aerial orthophotos and elevations
of GCPs were extracted from DEM
that was generated using 2m con-
tours originated from 1:10 000 topo-
graphic maps. For testing purposes
more than 30 GCPs were prepared
for each scene. The 1st order of RPC
adjustment was used for all scenes.
In the case of scene acquired over
Zlin region 34 GCPs were collected.
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
Ar t i cl e
39
October/November 2009
Figure 6: Full resolution orthorectified RapidEye Zlin data corrected without GCPs overlaid with Google Earth
Figure 7: Full resolution orthorectified RapidEye Koprivnice data corrected
without GCPs overlaid with Google Earth
The RMS GCP residuals
were about 2.0m in X
and 1.9m in Y with a
maximum residual of
5.4m in X and 4.4m in
Y. When all the GCPs
were changed to ICPs,
the RMS ICP errors
were about 3.7m in X
and 4.6 m in Y with a
maximum error of 6.6m
in X and 9.5m in Y.
In the case of scene
acquired over Kopriv -
nice region 30 GCPs
were collected. The
RMS GCP residuals
were about 2.6m in X and 2.3m in Y with a maximum residual of 5.8m
in X and 5.4m in Y. When all the GCPs were changed to ICPs, the RMS
ICP errors were about 5.1m in X and 3.9m in Y with a maximum error
of 10.5m in X and 8.6m in Y.
Hence, both data have RMS error within the resolution of the sensor
when no GCPs were used. Figure 6 and 7 show the orthorectified images
using no GCPs overlaid with Google Earth.
Automatic Mosaicking
The successful generation of high accuracy RapidEye orthos means that
it is possible to create seamless mosaics of RapidEye data without
GCPs. However, mosaicking and color balancing are usually extremely
time consuming processes. The PCI automatic cutline searching,
mosaicking and color balance tools could be used to perform the entire
process automatically. No human intervention would be required dur-
ing the process. To test the automatic mosaicking of RapidEye data,
the block of three Phoenix data were used. The mosaic file has a size
of approximately 5.6 Gigabytes. Figure 8 shows the overview of the
mosaic image and figure 9 shows a full resolution of the mosaic image
overlaid with the cutline in red color. It can be seen from figure 9 that
the roads are aligned to each other perfectly at the cutline between
the two images.
Automated Batch Processing using GPU
Since high accuracy RapidEye orthos and mosaics can be generated
automatically without GCPs, it is possible to integrate all the processes
in a fully automated batch system.
The batch programs required to per-
form all the steps are available
inside PCI software. It can be run
through python or PCI EASI scripts.
The advantages of automated pro-
cessing are that it will: (1) maximize
production, (2) automate repetitive
time-consuming tasks to produce
consistent results, (3) improve oper-
ating efficiencies, (4) reduce labor
costs, and (5) shorten throughput
time for the delivery cycle. The gen-
eration of a large quantity of high
accuracy orthos or mosaics, such as
a mosaic of an entire country, can
be generated easily with the auto-
mated system. Multi -
ple computers can also
be used to speed up
the processes. The
fully automated pro-
cess means that it is
easy to generate Ra -
pid Eye orthos/mosaics
for many critical appli-
cations for quick
turnaround.
Modern computer hard-
ware such as multi-core
processors and graphi-
cal processing units
(GPU) have been found
to improve the speed
of computation-bound
processes. The model for GPU computing is to use a CPU and GPU
together in a heterogeneous computing model. The sequential part of
the application runs on the CPU and the computationally-intensive part
runs on the GPU. From the users perspective, the application simply
runs faster because it is using the high-performance of the GPU to boost
performance. PCI GeoImaging Accelerator (GXL) has taken advantage
of this modern computer hardware by integrating the use of GPU com-
puting to perform intense computation tasks such as pansharpening,
orthorectification and automatic mosaicking. It provides speed im -
prove ments of approximately 6 times for pansharpening, 10 times for
orthorectification and 5 times for automatic mosaicking. These improve-
ments in processing speed will help the user to obtain results much
faster without any change in accuracy.
Conclusions
It is possible to generate high accuracy orthos and mosaics of Rapideye
data without ground control points for quick turnaround. The test results
show RMS errors consistently around one resolution of the data. The
fact the GCPs are not required for RapidEye geometric correction
translates to very significant cost and time savings for the user. In
addition, automated batch processing to generate a large quantity of
RapidEye orthos/mosaics is now possible using single or multiple
computers. The use of GPU computing can improve the speed of
orthorectification to 10 times faster and automatic mosaicking up to
5 times faster.
Dr. Philip Cheng cheng@pcigeomatics.com
is a senior scientist at PCI Geomatics.
Mr. Jiri Sustera jiri.sustera@gisat.gz is
remote sensing expert at GISAT.
The authors would like to acknowl-
edge RapidEye Company and JRC
European Commission for
providing the test data.
40
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
Figure 8: Automatic mosaicked RapidEye image of Phoenix
Figure 9: Full resolution automatic mosaicked RapidEye image of Phoenix over-
laid with cutlines
WWW.c|||a.eu 2009 SOKKlA TOPCON CO.,LTD
FeeI the freedom to move
Sokkia's SRX offers you the ultimate freedom to move in the feld of robotic measuring. Whatever the application,
the SRX delivers reliable and high precision results without losing target. Moreover the SRX total station range
offers an economic entry model which makes it accessible for everyone. All hard- and software components can
be confgured to your individual needs.
The SRX is equipped with the RED-tech EX EDM, the latest in Sokkia's innovative refectorless measurement
technology, which makes it possible to perform highly accurate refectorless measurements from 30cm up to
500m.
Experience 8okkia's 8RX total stations
Topcon GMS-2
The Office for Surveying and Registration in Mnster is responsible for the municipal mapping of the 302.9 square
kilometer city. In order to include detailed features within an accuracy range of less than one meter on the maps, the office
decided to use Topcons handheld GMS-2 receiver. Using the GMS-2 means that graduate engineer Erich Taube is able to
collect precise position information for areas that cannot be covered by existing aerial photography. In the future, this
information will be uploaded to the internet.
During a walk through the survey area, Mr
Taube described his work to us. The basic
1:5000 mapping and aerial photography of
Mnster form the basis for our work. This
existing information is completed by carrying
out measurements with the GMS-2, and thus
creates the basis of the municipal cartogra-
phy. We can compare a map on the spot with
the real world and record details. This, of
course, is only possible outdoors!
Updating the Mapping
An Important Task
Extending 21 kilometers from east to west
and 22 kilometers from south to north,
Mnster is the second largest city of
Northrhine-Westphalia in terms of area.
Currently, the Office for Surveying and
Registration employs around 100 people. One
of our tasks is the creation of all forms
of topographic mapping as well as con-
tinuous updating. All services derived
from this data, like the production of
prints etc., are also within our field of activi-
ty. During this process, quick and reliable
access to this data is essential. Therefore, we
use our own file server on which all geo-
graphic information is stored. Citizens are able
to chose from different thematic maps such
as Points of Interest and others.
Geographical Information
Current mapping of the city is needed not only
by the many civic offices and institutions but
also by companies and private individuals.
The Police Department and Emergency
Medical Services have a permanent need for
current maps and use our mapping products.
These maps are house-number accurate.
A key reason for purchasing the GMS-2 is its
ability to connect to the Panasonic CF-19
ToughBook running the HHK GEOgraf software
which makes use of SAPOS real-time correc-
tion data.
The GMS-2 is the most compact single-fre-
quency receiver that is able to process SAPOS
correction data and export corrected coordi-
nates as NMEA strings. The option of moni-
toring real-time measuring accuracy via HDOP,
VDOP and PDOP on the display is a great
advantage.
The use of the GMS-2 in connection with the
Panasonic CF-19 has stood the test of time.
Additionally, due to the great color display
and the software extension eTopPlus for
ArcPAD7 (developed by Topcon) it is possible
to use the GMS-2 without CF-19 in difficult
environments.
Internet: www.topcon-positioning.eu
42
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
Survey of the Munster
By one of the Editors
An Evolution of the Millennial Pair (Pt.1)
By Joc Triglav
From Anniversaries into the Future
This years 250-th anniversary of the inven-
tion of the famous watch H-4 that ultimately
resolved the longitude problem and the 400-
th anniversary of the first use of an astro-
nomical telescope is also an opportunity to
look at geodesy as a science of measuring
the Earths shape as a function of time. The
paper gives an insight in some basic devel-
opments and describes the historical devel-
opment of geodesy by pointing out and
demonstrating the relations between the
Earths shape, geolocation and time measure-
ments from the ancient times to the present
time. Since the ancient times the flow of time
was a natural measure of mans movements
in the physical space and of movements of
the Sun, the Moon, the planets and all the
other celestial bodies in the vastness of
space. Providing the scientific means of how
to reference the where and when through
millennia, geodesy enables to put the who
or what in the spatio-temporal space and to
present the answers to why and how ques-
tions. Astronomy, geodesy, surveying and
geography along with cartography, are the sci-
ences that naturally combine the knowledge
about space and time providing the natural
and social sciences a framework for the devel-
opment of the constantly growing knowledge
of humankind. One of the crucial tasks of
geodetic science in the modern era is to pro-
vide its unified spatial and temporal reference
to geoinformation science and its wide area
of application fields. Geodesy in the begin-
ning of 21st century is defined essentially by
the development of the Global Navigation
Satellite System (GNSS), which enables the
national geodetic organizations a gradual
transition from their specific national terres-
trial reference systems to the global terrestri-
al reference system. This way standardised
information on geolocation is becoming a
ubiquitous global utility, opening new win-
dows of opportunities for geoinformation sci-
ence and the humankind.
1 Introduction
This year we remember 250-th anniversary of
the John Harrisons H-4 (Figure 1, Figure 1(a),
1(b)), the famous watch that ultimately
resolved the longitude problem, one of the
toughest and most intriguing scientific prob-
lems of the larger part of human history. The
watch, the perfect Timekeeper for the
Longitude as the inventor called it, was fin-
ished in 1759 and provided with an excellent
timekeeping mechanism a purely mechanical
solution to the longitude problem.
On the other hand, the most brilliant scientif-
ic minds from all over Europe were searching
for centuries to provide an accurate and use-
ful solution for measuring the longitude, pur-
suing their astronomic measurements and
mapping the movements of the chosen known
celestial bodies in the sky. The year 2009 has
yet another important anniversary to remem-
ber. As a global celebration of astronomy and
its contributions to society and culture and
as a promotion of a greater appreciation of
the inspirational aspects of astronomy that
embody an invaluable shared resource for all
nations this year is declared as The
International Year of Astronomy 2009 and
marks the 400th anniversary of the first use
of an astronomical telescope (Figure 2(b)) by
Galileo Galilei (Figure 2(a)) and the resulting
journey of discovery for humanity.
Though the invention of the accurate watch
overran astronomers scientific efforts and
reached the ultimate longitude determinan-
tion goal first 250 years ago, we can see from
historic records and from todays perspective
that we need the best of both time mea-
surements and astronomic measurements
in order to define accurately a global founda-
tion for measuring objects in space and time.
In present times, the technology of accurate
time measurements has moved from mechan-
ical watches to cesium and rubidium atomic
clocks, while in the technology of astronomic
measurements the observations of natural
celestial bodies retain their fundamental value
44
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
Figure 1. Portrait of John Harrison (16931776)
painted in 1766. He invented the first practical
marine chronometer, which enabled navigators to
compute accurately their longitude at sea. (Image
source: https://history-wiki.wikispaces.com)
Figure 1(a). John Harrisons marine timekeeper H4,
obverse, diameter 132 mm.
(Repro ID: D0789_1, National Maritime Museum,
Greenwich, London).
Figure 1(b). Marine timekeeper H4 with open
upper plate and visible signature John Harrison &
Son A.D. 1759. (Repro ID: D789-B, National
Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London).
Geolocation and Time
in providing a unified reference of a modern
global terrestrial reference system.
However, since the middle of the 20th centu-
ry the natural celestial bodies are not the
only objects of observation for astronomers
and geodesists any more. With the Russian
Sputnik I in the year 1957, we entered into
the era of artificial satellites, which has
evolved in a few decades to such a level, that
the satellite techniques have gained an
essential and actually indispensable role in
global positioning, navigation and timing.
The US Global Positioning System (GPS) and
the Russian Global Navigation Satellite
System (GLONASS) system were established
as Global Satellite Navigation Systems
(GNSS), while the European Galileo and the
Chinese BeiDou2-Compass systems are
already in their initial operating phases. All
these systems are actually based on the
same concepts, i.e. on a constellation of
Earth orbiting spacecraft emitting signals with
precise orbital and time data. Suitable receiv-
er equipment combines the signals from at
least four spacecraft yielding the time and
the three spatial coordinates.
In a certain way, the humanity is in a similar
position nowadays as it was two and a half
centuries ago, when H-4 was made. Then the
long sought solution of the longitude prob-
lem was finally found and put into a mechan-
ical pocket watch to serve the sailors and the
public. Today, after a long and winding road
filled with innumerable new technological
inventions, we have reached a point of devel-
opment, when we are able to put not only
longitude, but also latitude, heighth and time
solution all together in a small electronic
2 A Short History of Relations
between Geolocation and Time
Common sense tells us that spatial aspects
of all existence are fundamental. Before an
awareness of time, there is an awareness of
relations in space. Space seems to be that
aspect of existence to which most other
things can be analogized or with which they
can be equated. The concept of spatial relat-
edness is a quality without which it is diffi-
cult or impossible for the human mind to
apprehend anything. For this reason, a man
in the earliest era of development developed
a sense of relations between here and there
and wanted to communicate these relations
to the others. At the same time, a man want-
ed to acquire them from these others. The
easiest way to do it was through maps. Maps
constitute a common language used by men
of different races and tongues to express the
relationship of their society to a geographic
environment.
Maps have changed and developed through
history as much as human mind and knowl-
edge did. The ways used to represent and
organize these spatial relationships in a form
of map changed and developed as well, from
the simplest forms up to present sophisticat-
ed digital products. Astronomy, geodesy, sur-
veying and geography along with cartography,
are the sciences that enabled this develop-
ment.
2.1 The Shape and the Size of Earth
Through the ancient times, several ideas and
opinions regarding the shape of the Earth
were prevailing among scholars, from a slab
to a drum- or pillar-shaped world and through
device to serve positioning, navigation and
timing professionals as well as the widest
public across the globe. The article outlines
in a few glimpses how the geodetic, survey-
ing, positioning and navigation science have
come this far and what steps can and should
be done in order to allow the humanity to
get the best use of knowing the combined
geolocation and time data as accurately as
possible. Due to the limited space of the
paper, the presented contents are obviously
selective and without a presumption or
attempt of historical completeness.
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
Ar t i cl e
45
October/November 2009
Figure 2(a). Portrait of Galileo Galilei (1564-1642),
painted in 1636 by J. Sustermans. Galileo has been
referred to as the "father of modern astronomy", as
the "father of modern physics", and as the "father
of science". (Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org).
Figure 2(b). Two of Galileos first telescopes; in the
Institute and Museum of the History of Science,
Florence.
Figure 3. Eratosthenes has used the same specific moment in time the summer solstice on both ends of
the arc to measure the central angle and calculate the circumference of the Earth.
an idea of a circular form eventually to a
spherical form. This spherical concept as a
fundamental idea for later progress apparent-
ly had its beginnings among the ancient Greek
Pythagorean philosophers in the 6th century
BC and elaborated through the works of the
philosopher Plato and his followers, includ-
ing Aristotle. By the time of Aristotle (384-322
BC), the spherical form of earth was general-
ly accepted. The ancient Greeks also applied
a system of dividing the circle into 360 equal
parts, which they inherited from the
Babylonian sexagesimal system (base-60) and
their astronomers. Temple records from the
city of Uruk in the late fourth millennium BC
already include evidence of dividing a year
into 12 months of 30 days each, i.e. in 360
days. Through observations of the Sun, Moon,
stars and the visible planets, they noticed the
circular track of the Sun's apparent annual
path across the sky and knew that it took
about 360 days to complete one year's cir-
cuit. Remember, in those times geocentric sys-
tem was adopted. We have confirmed much
later, that actually the Earth is revolving
around the Sun and not vice-versa. In order
to track each day's passage of the Sun's
whole journey they therefore divided the cir-
cular path into 360 degrees. Egyptians made
a step further around 1500 BC, dividing the
day into 24 hours. Originally, the hours var-
ied with the seasons, but Greek astronomers
with their systematic approach made later the
hours equal. About 300 to 100 BC, the
Babylonians subdivided the hour into base-
60 fractions: 60 minutes in an hour and 60
seconds in a minute. Based on actually the
same roots of the Baylonian base-60 number
system we have got a natural connection
between measuring time, angles, and geo-
graphic coordinates which with slight modifi-
cations lives up to present times. The shape
of Earth is thus logically inter-connecting the
measurement of geolocation and time for
thousands of years.
In addition, the first experimental defining of
the size of Earth in the third century BC is
closely connected with time by an ingenious
measurement method of Eratosthenes (276-
195 BC), the founder of geodesy. In his mea-
surement (Figure 3), Eratosthenes used a
known phenomenon at the well in Syene on
the river Nile, present Aswan.
There the Sun shone directly into its deep
46
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
Figure 4. World map from Claudius Ptolemy's ''Geographia'' published in Ulm, 1482 by Lienhart Holle, engraved by author Johannes Schnitzer (Credits: BPL).
Figure 5. Portrait of Johannes Kepler (1571 1630)
painted in 1610. He is the founder of celestial
mechanics and was a key figure in the 17th centu-
ry scientific revolution. 2009 is also the 400th
anniversary of his publication of Astronomia
Nova with his discovery of elliptical moving of the
planets around the sun and description of the first
two laws of planetary motion. (Image courtesy of
Sternwarte Kremsmnster)
waters at high noon on the longest day of the
year, the summer solstice on June 21, while
in Alexandria which lied approximately north
of Syene, no such event had ever been seen.
Instead, in Alexandria the Suns rays on the
same day formed an angle with the direction
of the plumb line. From the length of the
shadow of a vertical staff produced in a hemi-
spherical shell, Eratosthenes determined the
angle as approximately 1/50 of a complete cir-
cle. This angle is equal to the central angle
between these two places, as if measured
from the centre of a spherical Earth.
Eratosthenes applied the then estimated dis-
tance of 5000 stadia between Alexandria and
Syene to provide the circumference of the
Earth as 252000 stadia. Eratosthenes used
the stade III = 158.73 m as the unit of length.
Calculating in metric units the measurements
of Eratosthenes give a result of 40000km for
the circumference of the Earth and conse-
quently the result of 6365 km for the radius
of the Earth ( = 252000/2 = 40100 stadia =
6365 km). This value is differing minimally
from the radius 6371 km of the mean spheri-
cal Earth as derived with WGS 84 Ellipsoid,
which represents the best global geodetic ref-
erence system for the Earth available at this
time for practical applications of mapping,
charting, geopositioning and navigation. The
principle that Eratosthenes has used is the
measurement of the meridian arc in which he
used the same specific moment in time on
natural phenomena to fix it down to the body
of Earth. Ptolemy in his time has decided to
put its origin at the western edge of the
known world through the Fortunate (present
Canary) islands in the Atlantic Ocean north-
west of Africa. Through the centuries, the lon-
gitude line origin has been moved back and
forth across the maps almost at the free will
of later cartographers, until it finally settled
in Greenwich, UK by an international political
agreement. Namely, only in 1884 a conference
in Washington of 25 world nations agreed that
Greenwich would be the world's Prime
Meridian of longitude, world time and time
zones.
2.3 From the Spherical to the
Ellipsoidal Earth
With latitude and longitude the principles of
mapping the world were organized using a
both ends of the arc to measure the cen-
tral angle. The principle of meridian arc
measurements was used with modifica-
tions in geodetic observations up to
modern times.
2.2 Latitude, Longitude and
Time
Being known at least three centuries BC,
the lines of latitude and longitude were
by A.D. 150 drawn also in the first world
atlas by Ptolemy, the ancient scholar
with many scientific interests whos mil-
lennial fame and influence are mostly
the result of his two books, one on
astronomy and other on geography. In
astronomy, he introduced among other
things a simple but invaluable concept
of subdividing an arc degree in 60 min-
utes (lat. partes minutae primae) and
then further every minute in 60 seconds
(lat. partes minutae secundae). Thus, we
have minutes and seconds of time and
minutes and seconds of arc degrees. In
his book Geography Ptolemy defined
geography as a presentation in pictures
of the whole known world together with
the phenomena which are contained
therein, combining data on geolocation
and time. He also defined the task of
cartographer, which is to survey the
whole in just proportions that is, to
draw maps to scale. In his maps (Figure
4), Ptolemy used a grid system of lati-
tude and longitude lines as a reference
to geolocate the known items such as
lands, coasts, islands and towns on a
map. Longitude was expressed in frac-
tions of hours while latitudes were des-
ignated by the number of hours in the
longest day of the year. Once again, we
come across relating a grid of geoloca-
tions on a map to the measures of time.
The Equator as the zero-degree parallel of lat-
itude was already known then and fixed from
the laws of nature, i.e. from the observations
of the apparent movements of the Sun and
other celestial bodies. The astronomers knew
from astronomic observations, that during the
year the Sun is crossing the celestial equator
twice a year on its way between the two
extreme lines, where it turned around again
on its yearly path. The celestial equator is an
imaginary line, dividing the celestial sphere
in half, and the Suns path intersects this
equator on the beginning of spring and
autumn, marking the vernal and autumnal
equinox. Two imaginary extreme lines are
known as tropics, positioned at the latitudes
approximately 23.5 degrees north and south
of the equator. On the other hand, the zero-
degree longitude meridian line has no such
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
Ar t i cl e
47
October/November 2009
Figure 6. Portrait of Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
painted in 1689. He was a mathematician and
physicist, one of the foremost scientific intellects
of all time. Newton identified gravitation as the
fundamental force controlling the motions of the
celestial bodies. In his work Mathematical
Principles of Natural Philosophy, known as the
Principia, he developed the mathematics of orbital
motion round centres of force.
Figure 7.The Triangulation of France, 1792-1799. The meridi-
an arc stretching from Dunkerque in the north to Barcelona
in the south was measured along the Paris meridian
between 1792 and 1799 by French geodesists Delambre and
Mchain. Based on these measurements the metric system
was defined and introduced first in France and then gradu-
ally around the globe. (Image courtesy of Ken Alder, The
Measure of All Things)
simple geometric proposition, that the inter-
section of two lines is a point, i.e. to geolo-
cate a point on the Earth, we need to know
the lines of its latitude and longitude.
However simple this task may seem in princi-
ple at the first thought, its realisation in order
to make an accurate map of any terrain pre-
sents an enormous effort and demands going
into the field and actually measure and sur-
vey it. One of the crucial and fundamental
goals in this process is to define those refer-
ence lines, to establish them physically in the
field as a series of base lines from which later
surveys can be made.
Since the Ptolemys times, during the dark
middle ages up to the middle of the second
millennium the question of the figure of the
Earth has stood still. Then the arc measure-
ments, based still on a spherical model of the
Earth but benefiting from the advances in
instrumentation technology and methodolo-
gy, were pursued further in several European
countries, mainly in France, Holland, Denmark,
England and Italy. In that period of scientific
renaissance new ideas from astronomy and
physics have influenced the development of
geodesy and fundamentally changed the view
on the Earth and its position in space.
Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) formulated a
scientifically based heliocentric cosmology
that displaced the Earth from the center of
the universe. Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
(Figure 5) introduced the eponymous laws of
planetary motion, while Galileo Galilei (1564-
1642) opened a new era of astronomic obser-
vations with his improvements of the tele-
scope and established the fundamental laws
of falling bodies and of pendulum motion.
In the second half of 17th century, astronom-
ic observations revealed the flattening of the
poles of Jupiter and pendulum time measure-
ments confirmed the effect of increase of grav-
ity from the Earth equator towards the poles.
Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727) (Figure 6) com-
bined these observations and his theoretical
work on gravitation and hydrostatics in his
famous book Philosophiae Naturalis Principia
Mathematica, published in 1687. In the book,
Newton proposed as a model of the Earth a
rotational ellipsoid, flattened at its poles by
1/230 because of the Earths rotation. Several
geodetic arc measurements at various lati-
tudes were performed in the next century to
verify and possibly confirm Newtons theory.
The results of geodetic measurements
financed by the French Academy of Sciences
finally confirmed that the flattening of the
Earth exists and is large enough to be mea-
sured.
Related to these arc measurements, there is
a particularly significant year 1799 to remem-
ber. Namely, 210 years ago the French National
Assembly specified, constructed and deposit-
ed the platinum metre bar, on 22 June 1799,
in the Archives de la Rpublique in Paris, as
the final standard of length defined as 1 /
10,000,000 of the meridional distance from
the North Pole to the Equator. In order to
establish the length of the meridian as the
universally accepted foundation for the defi-
nition of the metre as the natural unit of
length, the Bureau des Longitudes commis-
sioned an expedition led by two astronomers
and geodesists, Jean Baptiste Joseph
Delambre and Pierre Mchain. Between the
years 1792 and 1799, they measured the
length of the meridian arc through Paris
between Dunkerque and Barcelona as the
basis for calculating the length of the half
meridian, connecting the North Pole with the
Equator (Figure 7). With this new definition of
the unit of length, France introduced the met-
ric system. The creation of the decimal metric
system at the time of the French Revolution
and the subsequent deposition of two plat-
inum standards in 1799 representing the
metre and the kilogram was the first step in
the development of the present International
System of Units. Almost one century later,
after agreeing upon a definition for the meter
at the diplomatic Conference of the Metre and
signing the Metre Convention in Paris in 1875,
a more stable international prototype of plat-
inum-iridium was realized and sanctioned in
1889 by the 1st General Conference on
Weights and Measures. This original interna-
tional prototype is still kept at the
International Bureau of Weights and Measures
(BIPM - Bureau International des Poids et
Mesures) under conditions specified in 1889.
2.4 Transition to the Geoid and the
Third Dimension in Geodesy
With the development of geodetic instrumen-
tation and methodology in the early 19th cen-
tury it was soon realized that in pursuing the
measurements of high accuracy level the
nature of the Earth is complicated more than
an ellipsoidal model of the Earth can handle,
therefore scientists attempted to define the
figure of the Earth more precisely. In 1832,
Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) (Figure 8)
strongly promoted the application of the met-
ric system, together with the second defined
in astronomy, as a coherent system of units
for the physical sciences. Gauss was the first
to make absolute measurements of the Earths
magnetic field in terms of a decimal system
based on the three mechanical units millime-
tre, gram, and second for, respectively, the
quantities length, mass, and time. Gauss
developed his theory of surfaces and intro-
duced the geoid as the mathematical figure
of the Earth, defined as a level surface of the
gravity field. The geoid deviates from a well-
fitting ellipsoid by less than 100 meters. The
efforts of geodesists in the 19th and in the
early 20th century have concentrated on the
measurements of large triangulation chains in
order to provide the parameters of ellipsoids,
fitting best to the geoid in the areas of mea-
surements. Based on such geodetic measure-
ments, which have often demanded enormous
human and scientific efforts of geodesists and
their crews, several referential ellipsoids were
introduced to support the triangulation of the
national geodetic surveys, which provide con-
trol points for national geodetic reference sys-
tems, mapping, positioning, etc. up to pre-
sent time (Figure 9).
Within these national geodetic surveys, the
geodesists observed and evaluated horizon-
tal and vertical control networks separately,
because heights were calculated regarding to
the mean sea level as a surface close to the
geoid, defined by long-term observations at
a tide gauge.
Further development of the geodetic method-
ology demanded a common mathematical
model for calculations of horizontal and verti-
cal networks. After the first ideas on such
three-dimensional concept of geodesy in the
48
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
Figure 8. Portrait of Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss
(17771855) at the age of 63. He was one of histo-
ry's most influential mathematicians and a scien-
tist who contributed significantly to many fields,
including geodesy. Gauss developed his theory of
surfaces and introduced the geoid as the mathe-
matical figure of the Earth, defined as a level sur-
face of the gravity field. 2009 is also the 200th
anniversary of the method of least squares, a proce-
dure used in all sciences to this day to minimize
the impact of measurement error, and which
Gauss was able to prove in 1809.
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
49
October/November 2009
second half of the 19th century, the concept
revived after the Second World War, especial-
ly with the invention of the electromagnetic
distance measurements in the 1950s and with
the first artificial satellite Sputnik I in 1957.
Geodetic observations to orbiting satellites
started providing data for determination of
control point geolocation in three-dimension-
al system and led to the development of
satellite geodesy.
Also in the second half of the 20th century, a
new essential space geodetic method and
technique of Very Long Baseline Inter -
ferometry (VLBI) was developed for measur-
ing a large selection of quasars, which has
lead to the present definition of the celestial
reference frame as a realization of a highly
accurate and stable inertial reference system.
Space geodesy developed its techniques in
the last decades of 20th century through sev-
eral characteristic periods based on measure-
ment method or technique. The periods over-
lap and begin with the optical period,
followed by Doppler, Satellite and Lunar Laser
Ranging (SLR, LLR), VLBI, Doppler Orbito -
graphy and Radiopositioning Integrated by
Satellite (DORIS), altimetry, SAR, InSAR, gravi-
ty and present GNSS period.
In the 1980s, the USA started to establish the
NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS)
and since the 1990s this system became fun-
damental in the geodetic measurement tech-
niques worldwide. This way, using GPS and
other satellite techniques, the geometry of the
Earth can be determined to a great level inde-
pendently of the gravitational field and glob-
al reference system is established. This devel-
opment allows geodesy to concentrate on
solving practical problems of transformation
of the existent horizontal and vertical net-
works of control points to the global refer-
ence system and of establishing high quality
relations between the geoid and the global
reference ellipsoid (end of Part 1, to be con-
tinued in the next issue of GeoInformatics).
Joc Triglav jtriglav@geoinformatics.comis a
professional surveyor and editor of
GeoInformatics. In the last 20 years, he published
more than 300 articles in various professional and
technical magazines, mostly in the fields of
geoinformatics and geodesy. Geoinformation
science and applications determine the entire
authors professional life, while geodesy,
cartography and geography since the early
childhood never ceased to fuel his
enthusiasm and imagination.
Figure 9. Exaggerated differences between common reference ellipsoids and WGS84
(Credits: Wolfram Research, Inc.).
Jena-Optronik GmbH
jas@jena-optronik.de
Our space
experience for your
benet on Earth
Three decades of aerospace
business enable high quality
spaceborne and airborne
cameras for Earth observation.
We have built a bridge from
space right into our everyday life.
Our surveying camera
Jena Airborne Scanner for
Remote Sensing and Mapping
provides you data with
- High geomeLrical accuracy
from 4000m altitude
- horizonLal less Lhan S cm
- verLical less Lhan 8 cm
- high spaLial resoluLion
- ol 17cm lrom 4000m alLiLude
- very high posiLional accuracy
- S dilerenL panchromaLic sLereo
chanels to reduce blind spots
- high radiomeLric resoluLion
Multi-spectral imagers
from Jena
Combining GPS, Satellite Communications and GIS
Knowing The Exact Vessel Location
Established March 2004 in Singapore, 3i
Technologies Pte is a provider of Electronics
Security and asset monitoring solutions. It
also operates a 24x7 command centre that
seagoing vessels with a Ship Security Alert
System can alert in the event of a security
incident.
The companys suite of asset monitoring solu-
tions, which make up about half of its total
business, consists of an automated vehicle
tracking system and a vessel monitoring sys-
tem. Called 3iVMS, the latter system is the
mainstay of 3i Technologies asset monitoring
business. Combining GPS, satellite communi-
cations and geographical information sys-
tems, it allows vessel owners to pinpoint the
location(s) of their sea craft at user-definable
time intervals and view their routes on a map.
Owners can also set up geo-fencing zones and
receive notifications as their vessels leave or
enter these zones.
Besides piracy, pilferage of cargo and fuel is
a problem for vessel owners. With geo-fenc-
ing, they can be alerted when their assets are
sent off their intended routes, whether by
hijackers or by a less than honest crew, said
Kenneth Tan, CEO of 3i Technologies.
When a vessel leaves a pre-defined geo-
fenced zone and does not enter another one
shortly after, he explained, an alert is sent via
email to the vessel owner, who can then turn
to 3i Technologies, port authorities or mar-
itime policing agencies for help in recovering
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
figure a, b, c, d and e: 3i Vessel Monitoring System (3iVMS) Powered by MapXtreme: Combining GPS, satellite communications and geographical information sys-
tems, 3iVMS allows vessel owners to pinpoint the location(s) of their seacraft at user-definable time intervals and view their routes on a map.
[a]
[b] [c]
50
it. In piracy incidents, crew members can trig-
ger alerts by pressing covert panic buttons
located on-board.
MapXtreme
The first application to be launched by 3i
Technologies, 3iVMS was developed using
Pitney Bowes Business Insights MapXtreme,
the software development kit (SDK) for inte-
grating location intelligence into both desk-
top and Web-based systems.
We did look at one other SDK but found
MapXtreme to be superior. MapXtreme also
came highly recommended by our hardware
partners so the choice was an easy one to
make, said Mr. Tan. MapInfo consultants,
whom he described as very responsive,
were involved in the development of 3iVMS
at the initial stage, helping to map the appli-
cation core with Inmarsat and telco gateways
as well as GUI integration.
3i Technologies delivers the 3iVMS applica-
tion to its customers as a service, with access
via the companys website. Users range from
individual tugboat owners to fleet operators
whose vessels ply routes connecting
Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam.
Full Steam Ahead
Going forward, 3i Technologies is working on
a low-power portable tracking unit that does
not have to be hard-installed on vessels or
other assets, and on a satellite broadband
link that will deliver vessel owners live video
of their vessels journeys. The company also
plans to introduce new applications that can
be accessed either via its website or as down-
loadable applications.
Were also looking at setting up offices or
partnerships in Malaysia, Indonesia and
Vietnam. Whichever local business model we
eventually choose, the MapXtreme-based
application core is already in place and
deployment should be a quick affair, said Mr.
Tan.
Kenneth Tan, CEO, 3i Technologies.
www.pbinsight.com
Implementation is a breeze, Mr. Tan said, with
just a few hours needed to install the neces-
sary hardware and make the system opera-
tional.
While competing vessel monitoring systems
are available in Singapore, these have only
generic functions. Thanks to the open archi-
tecture of MapXtreme, our 3iVMS application
is extremely customizable. This allows us to
custom-fit the application to each customer
such that all their unique needs are met.
The ease of integrating new technologies into
the 3iVMS core has also enabled 3i
Technologies to make two major enhance-
ments to the application. The first incorpo-
rates flow-meter sensors and allows vessel
owners to remotely and accurately check the
amount of fuel being used by their vessels.
Besides preventing pilferage of fuel, this
enables owners to do a better job of provi-
sioning voyages. The second enhancement,
draught sensing, makes it possible for gov-
ernment bodies responsible for natural
resources to ensure that dredging contractors
or concessionaires do not remove from the
seabed more material than they are allowed,
or dredge outside authorized areas.
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
[d] [e]
51
The Photogrammetric Week celebrated its centenary in Stuttgart from
7-11 September 2009. This was the 52rd Photogrammetric Week,
organised by Professor Dieter Fritsch, head of the Institute of
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing at Stuttgart University. On this
occasion nearly 500 participants attended from 62 countries.
Photogrammetric Week is a weeklong event which features details of
many of the latest developments in photogrammetry, remote sensing
and GIS, but it concentrates on photogrammetry as its name suggests.
The format is based on invited lectures each morning on academic
research and the latest developments of hardware and software from
manufacturers, followed by demonstrations of equipment during the
afternoons from Monday to Thursday. Evenings involve typical German
hospitality.
This years topics included a keynote presentation on Cloud Computing,
a review of the products available from the various photogrammetric
software and hardware providers and then papers on; image based
data acquisition; aerial, terrestrial and mobile lidar; and value-added
photogrammetry. Most papers covered the very latest developments
in these topics, so the event was an excellent conference to bring atten-
dees up-to-date with the status of developments in photogrammetry.
The presentations revealed that the number of medium format cam-
eras now available on the market with between 40 and 60Mpixels is
growing rapidly. They include Leica RC105, Intergraph RMK D, Vexcel
UltraCamL, DiMAC, Applanix DSS, Rollei AIC, and IGI DigiCam. Tests
on the new Intergraph RMK D medium format camera with 42Mpixels
demonstrate accuracies approaching those achievable by the large for-
mat cameras. The applications of the medium format cameras in the
future will be interesting to watch. There was a plea by several aca-
demics for photogrammetrists to embrace computer vision community
to develop more advanced techniques for processing images and to
ensure that the photogrammetric community is included in new possi-
bilities of image acquisition and processing, such as crowd sourcing of
images. Examples of crowd sourcing of images for later processing
were given.
There was a spirited debate on the application of airborne lidar com-
pared with multiple overlapping images for precise elevation determi-
nation. Some believe that lidar is an unnecessary technology, while
the others recognise the advantages of lidar with its high density point
sampling where no texture exists in images and its ability to penetrate
the canopy of forest vegetation. Accuracies of current lidars are now
better than 5cm on hard surfaces.
3D city models are increasingly being acquired for many cities in
Europe; for example, the company Blom will have 200 cities in Europe
covered with 3D models by end of 2009 using Pictometry technology.
A 3D city model of Berlin encompassing 500,000 buildings is now avail-
able. Bing, formerly Microsoft Virtual Earth, aims to collect 3D infor-
mation on 3000 cities around the world in 5 years and present the
information in 3D. The overall cost of acquiring the 3D city models is
planned to be reduced by 90%. There were some impressive demon-
strations of the completely automatic procedures being used to extract
buildings and display them in 3D. In order to facilitate the develop-
ment of 3D city models a new graphics standard has been developed
CityGML.
The conference was also an excellent opportunity to view develop-
ments in photogrammetry in Europe, which one could say is the birth
place of photogrammetry. Along with the centenary of Photogrammetric
Week, the Austrian societys involvement in the field of photogramme-
try turned 100 in 2008, the German Society for Photogrammetry and
Remote Sensing celebrated its centenary in March 2009 while The
International Society for Photogrammetry
and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) will cele-
brate its centenary on 4 July 2010 in
Vienna.
Column
52 52
October/November 2009
Participants of the Photogrammetric Week in 2009
Photogrammetric Week celebrates its
Centenary in Stuttgart, Germany
John Trinder, Visiting Emeritus Professor at
the School of Surveying and Spatial Information Systems
at The University of NSW, Sydney, Australia.
www.topcon.eu
Handheld with GPS & GLONASS
from meter to cm RTK
One 4 all
g
r
a
f
i
t
-
w
e
r
b
e
a
g
e
n
t
u
r
.
d
e
Processing of Data Downloaded in the
First Year of Observation
The study of deformations and crustal dynamics has found in GPS technology a very valuable and flexible tool that can
support and, in many cases, replace the traditional and complex geodetic measurements processed in long and expensive
survey campaigns. The European Project Interreg III B ALPS GPS QuakeNet - Alpine Integrated GPS Network has aimed to
be at the forefront in using this technology, distributing a network of permanent GPS stations on the Alps targeted at
monitoring this highly-active seismic area. The study and processing of the data will permit crustal deformation models
of the Alpine area to be confirmed or modified, with particular attention to seismogenetic areas for the prevention
of seismic hazards.
By Antonio Cavinato, Mirco Pollet, Cristiano Bellio and Roberto Piol
54
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
Monumentation of Geodetic
Permanent GPS stations
ARPA VENETO, a partner in the project coordinated by the University of
Triestes Department of Earth Sciences, installed three GPS stations: two
of them along the well-known geophysical profile TRANSALP, among areas
characterized by high deformations (the Feltre area and the Montebelluna-
Montello area), and a third in the Lessini Mountains.
These GPS stations provide the database for three processing centers:
Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, University Joseph Fourier of
Grenoble, Regione Lombardia.
The study and processing of the data will permit crustal deformation mod-
els of the Alpine area to be confirmed or modified, with particular atten-
tion to seismogenetic areas for the prevention of seismic hazards.
Selection Criteria for the Installation of Three ARPAV
Stations
The site choices were made in accordance with project objectives. The
requirements were to place two of the stations in the southern alpine
zone (between the Valsugana fault and the Southern Alpine front if
possible along the geophysical profile TRANSALP), to locate a station
in the Verona area, to have an obstruction-free sky, to be located in a
public site, to have geological stability, to have a power supply avail-
able, to have good GSM / GPRS network coverage and last but not
least, to have good accessibility. With these selection criteria, the fol-
lowing sites were identified in an early phase:
Monte Avena in Pedavena (BL), within the meteorological ARPAV sta-
tion (acronym MAVE coordinates GBO 1718811, 5101525)
City of Montebelluna (TV), within a water supply reservoir (acronym
MBEL - coordinates GBO 1737062, 5074465)
Bosco Chiesanuova (VR), within a Primary School (acronym BOSC -
coordinates GBO 1658670, 5051589)
Preliminary Investigations and Plan of the Three Sites
The identification of the three sites in the preliminary screening involved
the analysis of each sites geological stability and rock substrate position.
This screening was carried out for the Monte Avena (BL) and Bosco
Chiesanuova (VR) stations by surface analysis and verification of plans of
existing buildings in the areas. The screening for the station located in
Montebelluna (TV) involved a geognostic excavation that confirmed the
presence of the Montello Conglomerate at 1.50 m from the surface. From
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
Ar t i cl e
55
October/November 2009
Figure 1 The GPS network stations already existing (red), stations realized with the project (yellow).
Figure 2 on the left a planning solution with a surface foundation in the pres-
ence of hard substrate in outcrop.
Figure 3 on the right a planning solution with a drilled deep foundation with
micro-pillar in the lack of an outcropping substrate.
the geological and geomorphological points of view, these sites appeared
suitable for the planned GPS stations.
This preliminary investigation showed the suitability of the sites and led
to the definitive planning of the stations. After careful verification of the
available literature and technical instructions from UNAVCO
(www.unavco.org), the basic planning choices were:
a pillar in reinforced concrete, equipped with a surface foundation only
in the presence of hard substrate in outcrop
a deep drilled foundation with micro pillar in the absence of an out-
cropping substrate
an Electric UPS able to guarantee at least 48-72 hours of work with-
out power supply
With these considerations, two planning solutions with different founda-
tional typologies were developed as reported below.
Monumentation
The executive phase began with the installation of deep foundations.
The micro pillars were drilled 8.0 m deep; a steel pile 60.3 mm in diame-
ter and 4.0 mm thick was immediately inserted into the borehole. After
the installation of the framework, the hole was immediately saturated with
a gravity injection of liquid concrete to reinforce the concrete pillar.
At the Monte Avena site, the presence of a hard and outcropping sub-
strate on the surface allowed the framework to be built directly into the
rock. Some holes were made in the substrate in which the framework was
inserted and sealed with a special mortar.
The framework was welded to the micro pillar and to the support of the
GPS antenna to ensure optimal ground connection. After the welding of
the antenna base to the framework, the pipe for the antenna wires was
prepared and then the concrete for the monument was laid.
The construction of the concrete monument was followed by the electrical
and antenna connections. The completion of the monumentation and the
electrical connection allowed the installation and calibration of the GPS
receivers. The installed GPS and related accessories were a GPS Leica
GRX1200, a Leica AT504 antenna-type choke ring, a Siemens MC75 GSM /
GPRS modem, plus UPS and Leica Spider V.1.5 management and data
transmission software. The GPS installation and calibration, and the instal-
lation of software at the data centre in the ARPAV- Belluno Department
were conducted by technical staff of the GPS provider firm. Any malfunc-
tion was verified and connection and receiving data from the time of acti-
vation were regularly sent to the data centre in Belluno and archived.
Acquisition and Processing of Data
The acquired data includes a complete record of the three stations run-
ning from March 2006 until the present, and its availability made it possi-
ble to compile a one-year record of the three stations in order to verify
behavior, stability and accuracy.
The analysis was carried out using Topcon Pinnacle software version 1.0.
In addition, RINEX files from May 2006 to October 2007, together with
associated navigation files and IGS Final Orbit data, were also used.
Three lines and their relative level differences were analyzed:
Bosco Chiesanuova - Monte Avena, Montebelluna-Bosco Chiesanuova and
Monte Avena-Montebelluna: this first report was to evaluate the function-
ality and the quality of the installation. The results are reported below:
Base Bosco Chiesanuova - Monte Avena (BOSC-MAVE) average distance:
78155.96 m. Average height GPS station Monte Avena: 1466.2421 m.
Average height GPS station Bosco Chiesanuova: 910.4202 m.
Base Chiesanuova Bosco - Montebelluna (BOSC-MBEL) average distance:
81634.12 m. Average height GPS station Bosco Chiesanuova: 910.4202 m.
Average height GPS station Montebelluna: 214.7411 m.
Base Monte Avena - Montebelluna (MAVE-MBEL) average distance:
32645.07 m. Average height GPS station Monte Avena: 1466.2421 m.
Average height GPS station Montebelluna: 214.7411 m.
Final Considerations
The distribution of values recorded at these three stations shows a cyclic-
ity with distances lower in winter and increasing in summer. These fluctu-
ations are larger than the instrumental medium error rating, that is 2.0
mm, and sometimes exceeds 4.0 mm. This shows that factors such as
thermal expansion and crustal deformation may affect measurements.
While the already detected trends indicate clearly a phenomenon of expan-
sion / shortening with thermal seasonal cycling, the crustal deformation
related to the dynamics of the study area will be verified only during a
longer period (at least 10 years) contributing to the GPS-QuakeNet project
goals for the Alpine area.
Dr. Antonio Cavinato, acavinato@arpa.veneto.it,
Arch. Mirco Pollet, mpollet@arpa.veneto.it,
Dr. Cristiano Bellio cbellio@arpa.veneto.it,
Dr. Roberto Piol, rpiol@arpa.veneto.it.
ARPAV (Environmental Agency of Veneto Region) - Belluno Department - via
Tomea 5, 32100, Belluno (Italy).
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. Karim Aoudia - Department of Earth Sciences University of
Trieste, Dr. Rodolfo Bassan - Manager of ARPAV Environmental Systems
Department of Belluno and all the Partners involved in the Alps-GPS QuakeNet.
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
Figure 4 Welding of the framework to the micro pillar.
Figure 5 Detail of a
choke-ring GPS antenna
56
2010 FOIF NEW PRODUCT
Suzhou FOIF Co.,Ltd.
For more information please visit at:
or email to:
www.foif.com.cn
internationalsales@foif.com.cn
Since 1958
A20 GNSS Receiver
3G Satellites tracking (GPS,
Glonass, Galileo)
All-in-one Flexibility
Voice messages
OLED display with super
brightness & weatherability
Advanced GNSS tracking
performance
Advanced multipath mitigation
Advanced rugged design
TS650/680 can work together
with data collector by bluetooth
Total Station
RTS/OTS650 series
OLED display with super brightness
& weatherability
Arctic option for a wide range of
applications
Bluetooth cable-free connection
RTS/OTS680 series
RTOS & GUI platform
3D road design and stake out
SD card and internal memory
Bluetooth cable-free connection
RTS/OTS810 series
Windows CE 5.0 Operating system
Large full color graphic display
Touch screen
Guide light system
Professional onboard software:
FOIF Survey_TS or FOIF FieldGenius
FOIF Geomatics CAD desktop
software
FOIF FieldGenius field software
R o u t i n g B y L a n d ma r k s
A novel landmark identification and selection process enables now to incorporate landmarks in driving directions.
This process was implemented in Whereis.com, an Australian webmapping and routing service owned by Sensis.
According to Whereis.com commercial manager Fred Curtis, current trends in technology all point to increased
functionality alongside ease of use, so that's the direction we're heading.
By Stephan Winter, Matt Duckham and Michelle Robinson
Why is it easier to follow directions if they
are explained through a series of landmarks
instead of street names? Street names are fine
when you know the area or if it is adequately
signed, but how often do you tell someone to
turn left after the park or turn right at the 7
Eleven? In fact, research has shown that peo-
ple nearly always refer to landmark.
Sensis, the Telstra subsidiary that operates the
Whereis.com maps and directions service, now
incorporates landmarks in the driving direc-
tions it generates.
Landmarks are outstanding features in an envi-
ronment. Landmarks play a central role in
human spatial cognition. They are fundamen-
tal to the way humans learn an environment
and construct mental representations of it.
Landmark knowledge is the first level of spa-
tial knowledge a person develops in a new
environment: the tourist in Paris will quickly
learn about the Eiffel Tower and Montmartre,
but it will take her some time to learn a route
from the first to the latter or to use this and
other routes for combining a route not trav-
eled before. She will remember the caf close
to the Eiffel tower rather than the exact route
to the caf. To find the caf again, she might
first try to reach the Eiffel tower, which now
serves as a cognitive anchor point. And so on.
Because of their dominance in human mental
representations of space, landmarks are wide-
ly used in human communication about routes.
A reference left of Montmartre, not far away
is far more likely than a reference on Rue du
Cardinal Dubois, head West for 231m.
By contrast, today's web routing services and
car navigation services rarely make reference
to landmarks. Why is that? The main reason for
this omission is the lack of understanding what
a landmark is, and then, of course, a lack of
available data about landmarks. We do not
have data sets of the landmarks in an environ-
ment (which are different from Points of
Interest, see the following discussion). Recent
research on identifying landmarks in spatial
data sets typically relies on information about
the detailed visual or geometric characteristics
of the environment, such as 3D city models,
cadastral data sets, and/or imagery of building
facades. While data about these characteristics
is becoming more commonplace (at least in
urban areas), all too often such highly detailed
information about the spatial environment
does not exist, is proprietary, is infrequently
updated, or is otherwise unavailable except in
restricted spatial locations. Also, the proposed
landmark identification procedures are not yet
tested in practice, and hence, not readily avail-
able.
The Solution
So, how can we address this dilemma? First it
is important to acknowledge the difference
58
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
Figure 1: A local landmark, prominently
characterizing a street intersection
A
New
Direction
Latest News? Visit www.geoinformatics.com
Ar t i cl e
October/November 2009
between landmarks and points of interest. The
prior must be selected based on perceptive and
cognitive principles. The latter is rather a list of
a recommender service.
Deciding which landmarks are most useful is
really based on the uniqueness of the land-
mark, and this can be determined by three main
things; the landmark's meaning, its visual
salience and where the landmark is located, rel-
ative to the decision point on the route, said
Matt Duckham, senior lecturer in geographic
information science at the University of
Melbourne.
While computers can work out how far it is to
the next interaction, humans find it much easi-
er to use instructions that refer to places with
meaning and that we can easily identify.
Matt Duckham and Stephan Winter from the
Department of Geomatics at the University of
ture of the route, such that landmarks are cho-
sen at locations where the traveler has to turn,
or along long segments for confirmation. While
more and more categories are added, and rules
are tuned, routing by Whereis.com has already
access to 170,000 landmarks nationwide.
Let us study an example. Figure 2 shows the
ranked landmarks along one street segment
that are currently available in Whereis.com to
produce routing directions. Figure 3 shows
route directions along this street segment. Only
two landmark candidates were selected and
included in the directions, and both at strategi-
cally important locations along the route.
Stephan Winter and Matt Duckham, Department
of Geomatics, The University of
Melbourne, Australia.
Michelle Robinson, Sensis Pty Ltd, Australia
Melbourne developed for Sensis a model for
incorporating landmarks into routing instruc-
tions that does not depend on the visual or
geometric characteristics of individual buildings
and streetscapes. Instead the model relies sole-
ly on information about the types of landmarks
present in the environment, in addition to the
road network and route geometry. The motiva-
tion for this approach is primarily practical:
these information sources are much more com-
monly available and easily accessible, for exam-
ple in the form of a geocoded directory service.
This model was applied on Sensis Yellow Pages
business directory and directories of points of
interests from city maps. A set of cognitively
motivated rules ranks categories for their typi-
cal landmarkness, and then helps to pick up
the most salient landmarks along a particular
route. The second step considers also the struc-
Figure 2: Landmarks along
Spring Street in Melbourne.
Figure 3: Route directions with
selected landmarks along
Spring Street.
59
GITA is very pleased to announce that our 2010 Solutions Conference will be co-located with the American Congress on Surveying
and Mapping and Arizona Professional Land Surveyors 2010 Annual Conference and Technology Exhibition!
Calendar 2009/2010
November
10-12 November ESRI Middle East and North Africa User
ConferenceManama,
The Diplomat Radisson Blu Hotel, Bahrain
Tel: +973 1726255
E-mail: meauc2009@esri.com
Internet: www.esri.com/meauc
12 November NAV09 Conference & Exhibition
Southampton, U.K.
Internet: www.rin.org.uk/news-events/
events/nav09-conference-exhibition-0
15-21 November 24th ICC2009
Santiago, Chile
Internet: www.icc2009.cl/06_activities.html
16-19 November ASPRS/MAPPS 2009 Specialty Conference
San Antonio, TX, Texas Crowne Plaza Hotel, U.S.A.
Internet: www.asprs.org/sanantonio09/
19-20 November NAV09 Land & Timing
Teddington, Middlesex, U.K.
Internet: www.rin.org.uk/news-events/
events/nav09-conference-exhibition
25-27 November 3rd Workshop of the EARSeL Special
Interest Group on Land Use and Land Cover
Bonn, Germany
E-mail: zfl@uni-bonn.de
Internet: www.zfl.uni-bonn.de/earsel/
earsel.html
December
01-03 December 4th International Conference "Earth from
Space - The Most Effective Solutions"
Moscow, Russia
Tel: +7 (495) 739 73 85
Fax: +7 (495) 739 73 53
E-mail: conference@scanex.ru
Internet: http://conference.transparent
world.ru
02-04 December 5th gvSIG Conference "We keep growing"
Valencia, Spain
E-mail: contacto-jornadas-gvsig@gva.es
Internet: http://jornadas.gvsig.org/home/
view?set_language=en
07-08 December Web & Wireless GIS, W2GIS 2009
Maynooth, Ireland
Tel: 353 1 402 32 64
E-mail: carswell@dit.ie
Internet: www.w2gis.org
16-20 December 4th International Congress Geotunis 2009
Tunis, Tunisia
Tel: + 216 71 341 814
Fax: + 216 71 341 814
E-mail: info@geotunis.org
Internet: www.geotunis.org
January
18-19 January GIS in Oil & Gas 2010
Abu Dhabi, UAE
Internet: www.gisinoilandgas.com/
Event.aspx?id=207824
25-28 January DGI Europe 2010 6th Annual European
Geospatial Intelligence Conference & Exhibition
London, QEII Conference Centre, U.K.
E-mail: dgi@wbr.co.uk
Internet: www.dgieurope.com
26 January Civil Contingencies Conference
London, QEII Conference Centre, U.K.
Internet: www.govnet.co.uk/civil
February
02-04 February Gi4DM 2010 Conference Geomatics for
Crisis Management
Torino, Centro Congressi Torino Incontra, Italy
E-mail: info@gi4dm-2010.org
Internet: www.gi4dm-2010.org
08-10 February SPAR 2010 - 3D Imaging & Positioning for
Engineering, Construction, Manufacturing
The Woodlands , TX, Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel &
Convention Center, U.S.A.
Internet: www.sparllc.com/spar2010.php
March
03-05 March 10th International LiDAR Mapping Forum 2010
Denver, CO, Hyatt Regency, U.S.A.
Internet: www.lidarmap.org
09-11 March Oi10 - Oceanology International
London Excel, U.K.
Internet: www.oceanologyinternational.com
24-25 March GEO-10 The complete GEO Event
Ricoh Arena, Coventry, U.K.
Internet: www.worldofgeomatics.com
April
11-16 April XXIV FIG International Congress 2010 Facing the
Challenges - Building Capacity
Sydney, Sydney Convention & Exhibition Centre, Australia
Tel: +61 (02) 2 9265 070
Fax: +61 (02) 2 9267 5443
E-mail: fig2010@arinex.com.au
Internet: www.fig2010.com
12-16 April SPIE Photonics Europe
Brussels, Belgium
Internet: www.spie.org
26-30 April 2010 ASPRS Annual Conference
San Diego, CA, Town and Country Hotel, U.S.A.
Internet: www.asprs.org/SanDiego2010/
index.html
27-29 April GEO-Siberia 2010
Novosibirsk, Russia
E-mail: mazurova@sibfair.ru
Internet: www.geosiberia.sibfair.ru/eng
27-29 April SIBMINING 2010
Novosibirsk, Russia
E-mail: mazurova@sibfair.ru
Internet: www.mining.sibfair.ru and
www.petroleum.sibfair.ru
28-29 April CERGAL 2010
Rostock, Germany
Internet: www.dgon.de
May
25-29 May 4th International Scientific Conference
BALWOIS 2010
Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia
E-mail: secretariat@balwois.com
Internet: www.balwois.com
06-07 May INTERGEO East
Istanbul, Istanbul Convention & Exhibition Centre, Turkey
Internet: www.intergeo-east.com
18-20 May POSITIONALE
Stuttgart, Germany
Internet: www.positionale.de
June
21-22 June 2nd Open Source GIS UK Conference
Nottingham, University of Nottingham, U.K.
Internet: www.opensourcegis.org.uk
22-24 June Mid-Term Symposium of ISPRS Commission
V: Close range image measurement techniques
Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle University, U.K.
E-mail: j.p.mills@newcastle.ac.uk
Internet: www.isprs-newcastle2010.org
July
06-09 July GI_Forum 2010
Salzburg, Austria
Internet: www.gi-forum.org
October
05-07 October INTERGEO 2010
Cologne, Germany
Internet: www.intergeo2010.de
September
22-24 September GEO India 2010
New Delhi Expo XXI, India
Internet: www.oesallworld.com
Please feel free to e-mail your calendar notices to:calendar@geoinformatics.com
62
October/November 2009
Advertiser Page
Applanix Corp. www.applanix.com 19
ASPRS www.asprs.org 27
Cardinal Systems www.cardinalsystems.net 51
ESRI www.esri.com 30
FIG 2010 www.fig2010.com 43
FOIF www.foif.com.cn 57
GeoEye / Telespazio www.e-geos.it 10,11
GITA www.gita.org/gis 60
INPHO www.inpho.de 13
Jena-Optronik www.jena-optronik.com 49
Leica Geosystems www.leica-geosystems.com 63
Advertiser Page
Magellan www.promagellangps.com 64
Racurs www.racurs.ru 15
Riegl www.riegl.com 33
Sokkia www.sokkia.net 24,41
Spectra Precision www.spectraprecision.com 8
Stonex www.stonexsurveying.com 2
SuperGeo www.supergeotek.com 61
Topcon www.topcon.eu 53
Unigis www.unigis.org/uk 21
Advertisers Index
2009 2010
I believe in excellence.
Excellence gives you leverage by boosting
the market value of your imagery deliverables.
You want to collect terrain imagery in minimal time, with the
highest productivity, beneting from a complete digital workow
you want sharp, accurate data. Thats why Leica Geosystems is
on a constant quest for excellence. Our comprehensive spectrum
of solutions covers all your measurement needs for surveying,
engineering and geospatial imaging. And they are all backed by
world-class service and support that deliver answers to your
questions. When it matters most. When your work is airborne.
When it has to be right.
You can count on Leica Geosystems to provide an excellent
solution for every facet of your job.
The new Leica ADS80 Airborne Digital Sensor features advanced
line sensor technology and acquires imagery with equal resolution
across all bands for all applications from photogrammetry to
remote sensing.
Leica Geosystems AG
Switzerland
www.leica-geosystems.com
MobileMapper
6
True Mobile GIS for Everyone
MobileMapper 6 provides a complete set of all necessary features required of a
mapping device for anyone who needs productive data collection and efficient asset
management in the field. Through post-processing, the positions of every GIS
feature you collect can be better than meter-level accuracy.
The MobileMapper 6 comes with Microsoft Windows Mobile 6, a color touch-screen,
and has Bluetooth for wireless connectivity. This handy feature-rich GPS includes an
integrated 2-megapixel camera, an embedded speaker and microphone to enrich
the collected data with pictures and voice notes.
With MobileMapper 6, Magellan Professional innovates and fills a market gap in GIS
data collection between high-cost devices and consumer-grade products.
Contact us today to receive the white paper and read how MobileMapper 6
beats its competition. Visit www.promagellanGPS.com or email
professionalsales@promagellanGPS.com
2009 Ashtech LLC All rights reserved. MobileMapper is a trademark of Ashtech LLC. All other products and brand names are trademarks of
their respective holders.
Features
High-sensitivity GPS
Windows Mobile 6
Bluetooth connectivity
Submeter post-processing
For more information:
France (HQ) +33 2 28 09 38 00
Russia +7 495 980 5400
Netherlands +31 78 61 57 988
Affordable GIS/GPS with
nothing missing
NEW Submeter accuracy
with post-processing
professionalsales@promagellanGPS.com