You are on page 1of 6

IP-Geolocation Mapping for Moderately Connected Internet Regions

ABSTRACT Most IP-geolocation mapping schemes take delay-measurement approach, based on the assumption of a strong correlation between networking delay and geographical distance between the targeted client and the landmarks. In this paper, however, we investigate a large region of moderately connected Internet and find the delay-distance correlation is weak. But we discover a more probable rulewith high probability the shortest delay comes from the closest distance. Based on this closest-shortest rule, we develop a simple and novel IP-geolocation mapping scheme for moderately connected Internet regions, called eo et. In eo et, we take a large number of webservers as passive landmarks and map a targeted client to the geolocation of the landmark that has the shortest delay. !e further use "ava#cript at targeted clients to generate $%%P& et probing for delay measurement. %o control the measurement cost, we adopt a multistep probing method to refine the geolocation of a targeted client, finally to city level. %he evaluation results show that when probing about '(( landmarks, eo et correctly maps )*.+ eo,im -'./ and eo et is percent clients to city level, which outperforms current schemes such as

eoPing -'+/ by 01( and 0)2 percent, respectively, and the median error distance in around '0( km, outperforming eo,im and eoPing by )1 and 1( percent, respectively. EXISTING SYSTEM:

%raditional IP-geolocation mapping schemes are primarily delay-measurement based. In these schemes, there are a number of landmarks with known geolocations. %he delays from a targeted client to the landmarks are measured, and the targeted client is mapped to a geolocation inferred from the measured delays. $owever, most of the schemes are based on the assumption of a linear correlation between networking delay and the physical distance between targeted client and landmark. DISADVANTAGES OF EXISTING SYSTEM: %he strong correlation has been verified in some regions of the Internet, such as 3orth 4merica and !estern 5urope. But as pointed out in the literature, the Internet connectivity around the world is very comple6, and such strong correlation may not hold for the Internet everywhere.

Contact: 040-40274843, 9703109334 Email id: academicliveprojects@gmail.com, www.logicsystems.org.in

IP-Geolocation Mapping for Moderately Connected Internet Regions

PROPOSED SYSTEM: In this paper, we investigate the delay-distance relationship in a particular large region of the Internet 78hina9, where the Internet connectivity is moderate. %he data set contains hundreds of thousands of 7delay, distance9 pairs collected from thousands of widely spread hosts. !e have two observations from the data set. :irst, the linearity between the delay and distance in this region of Internet is positive but very weak. #econd, with high probability the shortest delay comes from the closest distance, and we call this phenomenon the ;closest-shortest< rule. Based on the observations, we develop a simple yet novel IP-geolocation mapping scheme for moderately connected Internet regions, called eo et. In eo et, we map the targeted client to the geolocation of the landmark that has the shortest delay. !e take a large number of webservers with wide coverage and known geolocations as passive landmarks, which eliminates the deploying cost of active landmarks. !e further use "ava#cript at targeted clients to generate $%%P& et probing for delay measurement, eliminating the need to install client-side software. %o control the measurement cost, we step-by-step refine the geolocation of a targeted client, down to city level. In practice, eo et can be deployed in combination with a certain localityaware application such that the application can easily obtain the geolocations of their clients. ADVANTAGES OF PROPOSED SYSTEM: %he contributions of this paper are twofold. :irst, by studying a large data set, we show that most of the traditional IP- eolocation mapping schemes cannot work well for moderately connected Internet regions, since the linear delay-distance correlation is weak in this kind of Internet regions. #econd, based on the measurement results 7M=9, we develop and implement eo et, which uses the closest-shortest rule and works much better than traditional schemes in moderately connected Internet regions. !e acknowledge that we are not the first to apply the closest shortest rule and the mapping accuracy of eo et is still not very high. $owever, we go a large step toward developing a better IP- eolocation system for moderately connected Internet regions. !e believe the accuracy will improve significantly if probing more landmarks.

Contact: 040-40274843, 9703109334 Email id: academicliveprojects@gmail.com, www.logicsystems.org.in

IP-Geolocation Mapping for Moderately Connected Internet Regions

SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE:

Contact: 040-40274843, 9703109334 Email id: academicliveprojects@gmail.com, www.logicsystems.org.in

IP-Geolocation Mapping for Moderately Connected Internet Regions

MODULES: '. %argeted client 0. >?@ Portal #erver ). 8oordination server +. !eb-server ,andmark MODULES DESCRIPTION: 1. Targeted C !e"t: !hen e6ecuting the "ava#cript code, the targeted client visits a non e6isting image in a certain web server by $%%P& et reAuest and records the delay. %he $%%P& et reAuest is sent multiple times and the minimum delay is assumed as the measured delay to the web server. %o bypass the possible web caches, each times the targeted client reAuest for different non e6isting images. !e should make sure that networking delay is the dominant part for the delay measured by $%%P& et probing. In other words, the server processing delay for $%%P& et reAuest should be Auite small compared with networking delay. #. VOD P$rta Ser%er: %he >?@ portal server is deployed for this particular study to attract clients to participate in the measurement study. !e embed some "ava#cript code in the webpages of the portal server. !hen a client visits the portal server, it gets the webpages and e6ecutes the "ava#cript code embedded. %he client interacts with the coordination server to carry out delay measurement during the time period when the client streams video clips from the portal server. %he landmarks are Bust regular webservers and only need to passively respond to the $%%P& et probings from the client. 4ll the measured results are reported to the coordinate server which finally maps each client to a city

&. C$$rd!"at!$" Ser%er:

Contact: 040-40274843, 9703109334 Email id: academicliveprojects@gmail.com, www.logicsystems.org.in

IP-Geolocation Mapping for Moderately Connected Internet Regions

%he coordination server is the core part of our system as it guides the targeted clients to perform all the measurement tasks, and process the measurement results. It consists of seven main componentsC three databases as well as four engines. %hey areC landmark database, measurement result database, location result database, landmark selection engine, landmark maintenance engine, Measurement result processing 7M=P9 engine and M4P 7IP-geolocation mapping9 engine. '. (e)*+er%er La"d,ar-: %o collect webserver landmarks, we have crawled a huge number of webservers and got their IP addresses. %hen, we check the geolocations of the webservers by multiple IP-geolocation mapping databases. ?nly those webservers whose geolocations are agreed by all the databases are chosen as passive landmarks in our system. %herefore, the error rate of the geolocations of the webserver landmarks is neglectable.

SYSTEM CONFIGURATION:* HARD(ARE CONFIGURATION:* Processor =4M $ard @isk Eey Board Mouse Monitor -Pentium DI> 0*. MB7min9

- 0( B #tandard !indows Eeyboard

%wo or %hree Button Mouse #> 4

Contact: 040-40274843, 9703109334 Email id: academicliveprojects@gmail.com, www.logicsystems.org.in

IP-Geolocation Mapping for Moderately Connected Internet Regions

SOFT(ARE CONFIGURATION:* Operating System Programming Language Java Version Data%ase : Windows XP : JAVA/J2EE : JD !"# $ a%ove" : &'S(L

REFERENCE:

@an ,i, "iong 8hen, 8huan6iong

uo, Fun6in ,iu, "inyu Ghang, Ghili Ghang, and Fongguang

Ghang, ;IP*Ge$ $.at!$" Ma//!"g 0$r M$derate 1 C$""e.ted I"ter"et Reg!$"+ <, I555 %=43#48%I?3# ?3 P4=4,,5, 43@ @I#%=IBH%5@ #F#%5M#, >?,. 0+, 3?. 0, :5B=H4=F 0(').

Contact: 040-40274843, 9703109334 Email id: academicliveprojects@gmail.com, www.logicsystems.org.in

You might also like