I.

Filing Fees 1. Ruby Shelter Builders and Realty Development Corporation v Formaran 2. Montaner, et al. v Shari a Distri!t Court ". #hilippine First Insuran!e v First $ogisti!s %. Bautista v &nangast '. #roton #ilipinas v Ban(ue )a!ional de #aris *. Re(uest on )ational Committee on $egal +id to ,-empt $egal +id Clients .rom #aying Filing and Do!/et Fees 0. 1uery o. Mr. Roger C. #riores!hi re e-emption .rom legal and .iling .ees o. the 2ood Shepherd Foundation, In!. 3urisdi!tion B# 124 R+ 0*41 1441 Rules on Summary #ro!edure Rules on Small Claims 1. 2. ". %. '. *. 0. 5hornton v 5hornton Far ,ast Ban/ v Shemberg +rriola v )abor +rriola Spouses 6illa!astin v #elae7 De 2u7man v Caminas Figueroa v #eople De Barrera v 8eirs o. $egaspi

II.

III.

Cause o. +!tion 1. Mindanao 5erminal v #hoeni- +ssuran!e 2. #hilip 5urner, et al. v $oren7o Shipping Corporation ". Chua v Metroban/, et al. %. #antran!o )orth ,-press, In!. v Standard Insuran!e Company, In!. '. Spouses #ere7, et al. v +ntonio 8ermano #arties 1. )ag/a/aisang $a/as ng Manggaga9a sa :,I8I) v :,I8I) #hilippines Corp. 2. Republi! v Coalbrine International #hilippines ". Republi! v +gunoy %. Cua, 3r. et al. in their !apa!ity as Dire!tors o. the #hilippine Ra!ing Club, In!. v 5an, et al. '. Banda v ,rmita *. MI++ v Rivera $essee 8omeo9ners +sso!iation 0. )apere v Barbarona ;. Sumal<ag v $iterato 4. 8eritage #ar/ Management v CI+C 1=. +lgura v $2& o. the City o. )aga 6enue 1. $antin v $antion 2. San Miguel Corporation v Monasterio ". Irene Mar!os +raneta v C+ Summary #ro!edure

I6.

6.

6I.

1. 2. ". %. 6II.

Ma!adangdang v 2aviola Bongato v Malvar Banares v Balising Maderada v Mediodea

#leadings 1. 3o!son v C+ 2. +gana v $agman ". Iglesia ni :risto v #on.errada %. Republi! v SB >2=="? '. 3uaban v ,spina *. :orean 5e!hnologies v $erma 0. Filipinas 5e-tile v C+ ;. Sy 5iong v Sy Chim 4. #5+ o. St. Matthe9 +!ademy v Metroban/ 1=. #ermanent Savings Ban/ v 6elarde Dea.ault 1. +nun!a!ion v Bo!anegra 2. Martine7 v Republi! ". Santos, 3r. #)@C ,-ploration Corp. %. +(uino v +ure +mendment and Supplement 1. #+2C@R v $ope7 2. +sean #a!i.i! v City o. &rdaneta ". 5iu v #BC@M Bill o. #arti!ulars 1. Baritua v Mer!ader 2. Reyes v R5C o. Ma/ati ". Republi! v SB >2==0? Servi!e and Filing 1. Domingo v C+ 2. Romulo v #eralta ". Spouses 5opa!io v Ban!o Filipino %. +tlanti! ,re!tor v 8erbal Cove '. St. Mary o. the Boods S!hool v @..i!e o. the Registry o. Deeds o. Ma/ati *. 6i!ente v +vera 0. 8eirs o. $ope7 v ,nru(ue7 ;. F,&C)RMF v F,&C)RMF +FB Summons 1. Cada v 5ime Saver 2. #as!ual v #as!ual ". Manoto! v Ca %. Sansio v Mogol '. Republi! v 2lasgo9 *. #alma v 2amve7 0. +!an!e v C+

6III.

IA.

A.

AI.

AII.

AIII.

Motions 1. Republi! v #eralta 2. #reysler v Manila South!oast ". Ba!elonia v C+ Motion to Dismiss 1. 8eirs o. $oreto Maramag v Maramag 2. &C#B v Beluso ". Manila Ban/ing v &niversity o. Baguio %. Strong9orld Constru!tion v )C #erello Dismissals by the #lainti.. 1. $ima!o v 2a/uen 2. #inga v 8eirs o. Santiago #reCtrial 1. Dia7 v C+ 2. +l!ara7 v Ca ". Ma!asaet v Ma!asaet Intervention 1. $ooyu/o v C+ 2. $impo v C+ ". +sian 5erminals v Ri!a.ort

AI6.

A6.

A6I.

A6II.

A6III. Subpoena 1. Collado v Bravo 2. Ro!o v Contreras AIA. Deposition a. Deposition ta/en in another pro!eeding Cariaga v C+ b. Deposition may be ta/en any time a.ter institution o. any a!tionD &ses o. deposition 3onathan $and @il v Mangudadatu !. Deposition not a substitute .or .a!tual testimony Sales v Sabino d. #eriod to apply .or deposition Rosete v $im e. )onCresident .oreign !orporation to testi.y through deposition San $uis v Ro<as .. +ppli!ation o. Rule 2" in !riminal !ases Manguerra v Risos g. #urpose o. ta/ing deposition #a<arilla v C+ h. $etter rogatory and !ommission Dulay v Dulay i. Failure to ans9er 9ritten interrogatories 3uravata v :arolus <. Conse(uen!es o. .ailure to ans9er interrogatories

Eepeda v China Ban/ing Corporation /. Re(uest .or +dmission not ans9eres Sime Darby v )$RC l. Matters !overed by a re(uest .or admission DB# v Ca m. Re(uest .or +dmission instead o. @..er to Stipulate Man7ano v Despalidares n. Failure to respond to Re(uest .or +dmission $imos v Spouses @dones o. +mparo rule li/ened to #rodu!tion @rder Se!retary o. )ational De.ense v Manalo p. Do!uments to be produ!es should be des!ribed 9ith parti!ularity Solidban/ v 2ate9ay ,le!troni!s AA. 5rial, 5rial by Commissioners, 8earing and Consolidation o. Cases 1. $ourde7 de Castro v Crispino de Castro 2. Eulueta v +sia Bre9ery ". Ro(ue v Magno %. Mega $and v CC, Constru!tion, In!. Demurrer to ,viden!e 1. Radio9ealth v Del Rosario 2. #eople v Ca!hola 3udgment on the #leadings and Summary 3udgment 1. Bood 5e!hnology v ,(uitable Ban/ing 2. Bas!ug v +randay ". ,land #hil. v 2ar!ia

AAI.

AAII.

AAIII. 3udgment 1. Consing v C+ 2. 8eirs o. 6alde7 v C+ ". Intramuros 5ennis v #5+ AAI6. Motion .or Re!onsideration and )e9 5rial 1. Fernande7 v C+ 2. Republi! v #eralta ". #eople v @dilao %. )eypes v C+ '. 5an v C+ AA6. #etition .or Relie. .rom 3udgment 1. +laban v Ca 2. Samartino v Raon

AA6I. ,-e!ution o. 3udgment 1. Capa v C+ 2. )avaros v Comele! ". International S!hool v Ca %. Mana!op v ,(uitable Ban/ '. Curata v ##+

*. 2ar!ia v #+$ 0. +renas v C+ ;. In.ante v +ran Builders 4. 3ose. v Santos 1=. D +rmoured Se!urity v @rpia 11. Ca<a v )an(uil 12. Eamora v 6illanueva 1". $andrito v C+ 1%. Marsmony 5rading v C+ 1'. Benite7 v +!osta 1*. St. +viation Servi!es v 2rand International +ir9ays AA6II. +ppealsF@riginal +!tions in the SC and C+ #etition .or revie9 G @)$H .iled 9ith the C+ o In the SC G .ile R%' o R%2I M5C >9F orig <urisdi!tion? R5C >9F appellate <urisdi!tion? C+ R5C to C+ J R%2 #etition .or revie9 .iled 9ith the C+ &nder R%= >@rdinary +ppeal? onlyI M5C R5C K)@5IC, o. appeal .iled 9ith M5C G !ourt 9hi!h rendered de!ision? LL)@5,I #etition .or R,$I,F .rom <udgment )@5 .iled 9ith ne-t level !ourt, but 9ith the !ourt 9hi!h rendered the de!ision o R%"I +ppeal de!ision o. a 13+ to the C+ LL)@5,I R%' is the @)$H M@D, to go to the SC G !ivilF!riminalD #eople v Mateo >3. 6itug? G R12%.1" 9as amended &)$,SS e-pressly enumerated in R%", loo/ at the 13+ a !harter .irstM 8$&RB @#C+ C+B >amended !harter? S,C R5C >intraC!orporate dispute? GKSC Cir!. 2=='N C+ >on petition .or revie9D instead o. ordinary appeal? Spe!ial <urisdi!tion G poli!y !onsiderationD petition .or relie. easier resolved >.aster? than ordinary appeal. Contents o. #etition o Full names o. the arties o Material Dates Date 9hen appealing party R,C,I6,D the de!ision Date o. .iling MR i. any Date 9hen party re!eived denial o. MR o Dupli!ate original >e-e!uted on or about the same time onion s/in !opy? $ast page should be signed by the <udge or <usti!e o #ertinent re!ords and pleadings >R%2? In R%"I +$$ must be C,R5IFI,D 5R&, C@#I,S o C)FS o 6eri.i!ations o +..idavit o. Servi!e By the person mailing o )otari7ed

Community 5a- Cert. no longer a!!eptedD must be passport or any government issued ID o Signature >o. la9yer? IB# )o. #5R )o. MC$, )o.F,-!eption ,mail address and !onta!t no. only 9hen .iling 9ith the SC #eriodI 1' days o ,-tensionO H,S. 1. Fernando v Santamaria 2. Madrigal 5ransport v $apanday ". )+#@C@R v #aderanga %. State Investment v Delta Motors '. $and Ban/ v +rlene de $eon *. +guilar v Comele! 0. Cardona v +manse! ;. Corne<os v C+ 4. @aminal v Castillo 1=. Sabastian v Morales

AA6III. #etition .or +nnulment o. 3udgment 1. @rbeta v Sendiong 2. )ery v $eyson ". Ceruila v Delantar %. Salera v +C1 Investors '. Cole v C+ AAIA. #rovisional Remedies a. +tta!hment 1. Se!urity #a!i.i! v +melia 5riaCIn.ante 2. 5orres v Satsatin ". Insular Savings v C+ %. Hu v )go Het 5e b. #reliminary In<un!tion 1. &niversal Motors v Ro<as 2. 2reenstar v +ndiong ". $andban/ v Continental Bat!hman %. Ba!olod City Bater v $abayen !. Re!!eivership 1. Citiban/ v C+ 2. Republi! v Saludares d. Replevin 1. 59in +!e 8olding v Ru.ina and Company 2. Superline 5ransportation v #)CC ". Dagudag v #aderanga e. Support #endente $ite 1. Mangonon v C+ AAA. Spe!ial Civil +!tions a. Interpleader

b.

!. d.

e. ..

g.

h. i. <.

1. @!ampo v 5irona 2. Maglente v #adilla ". +rre7a v Dia7 De!laratory Relie. 1. +lmeda v Bathala Mar/eting 2. Malana v 5apa ". DBM v Manila s Finest %. Me<ia v 2abayan Revie9 o. 3udgment o. C@+ and C@M,$,C Certiorari, #rohibition and Mandamus 1. Certiorari Republi! v Carmel Development 2. #rohibition City 2overnment o. 1C v Bayantel ". Mandamus Raul $ambino v Comele! ,s(uivel v @mbudsman 1uo Barranto 1. $iban v 2ordon 2. Divinagra!ia v Consolidated Broad!asting ,-propriation 1. Bardillon v Barangay Masili 2. Republi! v Mangotara ". Republi! v C+ %. )#C v Santa $oro '. +po Fruits v C+ *. Republi! v 8oly 5rinity Development Corp. 3udi!ial Fore!losure 1. 8eurta +lba v C+ 2. Ba!aling v Muya ". Mon7on v Relova 3udi!ial #artition 1. Sepulveda v #elae7 ,<e!tment 1. &y v Santiago 2. Serrano v 2utierre7 Contempt 1. Curata v ##+ 2. Fuentes v +lbarra!in