Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1, FEBRUARY 1993 23
Abstract-The paper deals with the basic concepts, mathemat- converters. This reason predetermined both the high ef-
ics, and design aspects of variable structure systems as well as ficiency of sliding mode control for electric drives and the
sliding modes as a principle operation mode. The main argu-
ments in favor of sliding mode control are order reduction, author choice of the application selection topic in this
decoupling design procedure, disturbance rejection, insensitivity paper.
to parameter variations, and simple implementation by means of
power converters. The control algorithms and data processing 11. SLIDING
MODESIN VSS
used in variable structure systems are analyzed. The potential of Variable structure systems consist of a set of continu-
sliding mode control methodology is demonstrated for versatility
of electric drives and functional goals of control. ous subsystems with a proper switching logic and, as a
result, control actions are discontinuous functions of sys-
tem state, disturbances (if they are accessible for mea-
I. INTRODUCTION surement), and reference inputs. In the course of the
entire history of control theory, intensity of discontinuous
Al high level of scientific and publication activity, an
nremitting interest in variable structure control en-
hanced by effective applications to automation problems
control systems investigation has been maintained at a
high enough level. In particular, at the first stage, on-off
or bang-bang regulators are ranked highly due to ease of
most diverse in their physical nature, and functional pur- implementation and efficiency of control hardware.
poses are a cogent argument to consider this class of Futhermore, we shall deal with the variable structure
nonlinear systems as a prospective area for study and systems governed by
applications.
The term “variable structure system” (VSS) first made X = f ( x , t , u ) , x E Rn,U E R”
its appearance in the late 1950’s. Since that time, the first
expectations of such systems have naturally been reevalu- u + ( x , t ) if s ( x ) > 0 (for each component)
ated, their real potential has been revealed, new research
u - ( x , t ) if s ( x ) < 0
directions have been originated due to the appearance of
new classes of control problems, new mathematical meth- (1)
ods, recent advances in switching circuitry, and (as a
consequence) new control principles.
The paper is oriented to base-stone ideas of VSS design
methods and selected set of applications rather than the The VSS (1) with continuous functions f,s, U + , U - con-
survey information or a historical sequence of the events sists of 2” subsystems and its structure varies on m
accompanying VSS development since at its different surfaces at the state space. From the point of view of our
stages survey papers on theory [1]-[4] and applications [51, later treatment, it is worth quoting the elementary exam-
161 have been published. In addition, monographs [7]-[12] ple of a second-order system with bang-bang control and
summarize the results of these stages. sliding mode:
Furthermore, it will be shown that the dominant role in
VSS theory is played by sliding modes, and the core idea x + a2X + a , x = U ,
of designing VSS control algorithms consists of enforcing
this type of motion in some manifolds in system state U = - M signs
spaces. Implementation of sliding mode control implies
high-frequency switching. It does not cause any difficulties s = cx + X,M , c , a , , a 2 - const ( 2 )
when electric drives are controlled since the “on-off”
operation mode is the only admissible one for power which was considered by Andronov et al. [131 in connec-
tion with his study of autopilot dynamics. It follows from
Manuscript received June 6, 1992. A revised version of the paper was
analysis of the (X,x) state plane (Fig. 1) that, in the
presented at the IEEE VARSCON ’91 Workshop, Reno, NV, June 6, neighborhood of segment mn on the switching line s = 0,
1991. the trajectories run in opposite directions, which leads to
The author is with the Institute of Control Sciences, 117 806, Moscow,
Russia.
the appearance of a sliding mode along this line. The
IEEE Log Number 9204071. switching line equation s = 0 may be treated as a motion
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
24 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 40, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1993
Fig. 1. Sliding mode in a second-order relay system. Fig. 2. State planes of linear structures.
one
cx+x=o (3) \ i
with solutions depending only on the slope gain c and
invariant to plant parameters and disturbance (should the
plant be subjected to).
x
The sliding mode domain is bounded in the above
example, but if the amplitude of discontinuous control is
made state dependent ( M = klxl, k = const), it may coin-
cide with the whole switching line. The system consists of
two linear structures (U = krc and U = -la) shown in Fig.
2 for a, = 0, a2 < 0. Due to the sliding mode (Fig. 3) after Fig. 3. Sliding mode in a variable structure system.
the state reaches s = 0, it decays exponentially in accor-
dance with (3).
The systems with discontinuous control (1) are known
to generate sliding modes with state trajectories running
in discontinuity surfaces as well. Similar to the above
examples, state velocity vectors may be directed toward
one of the surfaces and sliding mode occurs along it (arcs
ab and cb in Fig. 4). It may arise also along their intersec-
tion (arc bd). Fig. 5 illustrates the sliding mode at the
intersection even if it does not exist at each of them taken
separately.
Let us discuss major reasons why sliding modes were
and are of exceptional significance in VSS control Fig. 4. Sliding mode in discontinuity surfaces and their intersection.
methodology. First, in sliding mode the input of the ele-
ment implementing discontinuous control is close to zero
while its output (exactly speaking its average value U,)
takes finite values (Fig. 6). Hence the element implements
high (theoretically infinite) gain, that is the conventional
mean to suppress influence of disturbances and uncertain-
ties in system behavior. Unlike systems with continuous
control, the invariance is attained using finite control
actions. Second, since sliding mode trajectories belong to
some manifold of a dimension lower than that of the
Fig. 5. Sliding mode in the intersection of discontinuity surfaces.
system, the order of a motion equation is reduced as well.
This enables simplification and decoupling design proce-
dure. Both order reduction and invariance to plant dy-
namics are transparent for the above second-order exam-
ple. And, finally, a pure technological aspect of using
sliding mode control should be mentioned. To improve
the performance, inertialess power thyristor and transistor f
converters are increasingly used as actuators in control
systems. Even if continuous algorithms are employed, the
control is shaped as a high-frequency discontinuous signal
with an average value equal to the desired continuous
control since a switching mode is the only operation one Fig. 6. Implementation of high-gain control via the sliding mode.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
UTKIN: SLIDING MODE CONTROL DESIGN PRINCIPLES 25
1 S L X D X N a MODE CONTROL I
,
M a t h c
m a t Ic a 1
Methods
M
0
-
E
x
1 Applications
1
P
T?
t I. 0
I s C
-
e
-
0 t
n c a
n a
c
9 V =
U
a c i n
t 0 m n
i n 0 I
.
0 & t i 0
0 n
d
U
=
t
I rl
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
26 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 40, NO. 1 , FEBRUARY 1993
solution to the system with ideal sliding modes. Otherwise Uniqueness of sliding mode equations explains why the
we have to recognize that the equations beyond disconti- study of control systems with linear dependence on con-
nuity surfaces do not derive unambiguously the motion trol has turned out the main (if not the only) stream in
equation in their intersection. VSS theory. Note that in the above second-order example,
Boundary-layer regularization enables substantiation of nonlinear dependence of the motion equation on control
the so-called equicalent control method [ 141 intended for resulted in the ambiguous sliding mode equations.
deriving a sliding mode equation in the systems depending The second mathematical problem relates to conditions
on linear control: for a sliding mode to exist. They are equivalent to condi-
tions of state trajectory convergence to the intersection of
X =f(x,t) + B(x,t)u (4) discontinuity surfaces s = 0. Therefore, the existence con-
where B ( x , t) is an n x m matrix. In accordance with the ditions may be formulated in terms of stability of the
method control, U should be replaced by the equivalent origin in m-dimensional space s, or subspace of the dis-
control, which is the solution to tances to discontinuity surfaces. To derive existence con-
ditions in analytical form, the equation of the projection
S = Cf + GBu,, = 0, G = (as/ax) of overall motion on subspace s
For det GB # 0 (ue! = - ( G B ) - ' G f ) , the sliding mode S = Gf + GBu (7)
equation in the manifold s = 0 is
should be analyzed for example by designing a Lyapunov
i = [I - B(GB)-'G]f. (5) function. The simplest case is for GB being an identity
matrix. Then for U = - M signs ((signs)T = (signsl;..,
Since s ( x ) = 0 in sliding mode m components of the state signs,)) with M exceeding the upper estimates of vector
vector x may be found as a function of the rest ( n - m) Gf elements, the functions S, and s, ( i = 1;",m) have
ones: x 2 = so(x,), x 2 , s o E R", x , E R"-'" and, corre- different signs. It means that the sliding mode will occur
spondingly, the order of the sliding motion equation may in each discontinuity surface.
be reduced by m : The most interesting fact is that the Lyapunov function
testifying to convergence to the manifold s = 0 is a finite
function of time. It vanishes after a finite time interval. AS
The idea of the equivalent control method may be easily a result, sliding mode arises in a finite time instant in
explained with the help of geometric consideration. Slid- contrast to continuous systems with only asymptotic tend-
ing mode trajectories lie in the manifold s = 0 and the ing to any manifold consisting of system trajectories [111.
equivalent control ueq being a solution to the equation
S = 0 implies replacing discontinuous control by such a IV. DESIGNPROCEDURE
continuous one that the state velocity vector lies in the The discussed methods pertaining to sliding mode
tangential manifold. equations and existence conditions constitute the back-
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
UTKIN: SLIDING MODE CONTROL DESIGN PRINCIPLES 27
ground for the variety of design procedures in VSS. De- v. SLIDING MODECONTROL 1N LINEARSYSTEMS
coupling or invariance or both are inherent in any of Consider conventional control tasks for linear plants
them. High dimension and uncertainties in system behav-
ior are known to be serious obstacles in applying efficient i =Rx + B u , x Rn,U E R"
E (10)
control algorithms and using both analytical and computa- ( A , B are constant matrices, rank B = m ) to demonstrate
tional methods. the sliding mode design procedure based on the decou-
In connection with control of high-dimensional plants, pling principle.
the design methods permitting decoupling of the overall The system (10) may be transformed to the regular
motion into independent partial components are of great form [151
interest. Decoupling in discontinuous control systems (4) i ,= A , , x ,+A,?X,
is easily feasible. The sliding mode equation (6) is of a i2= A 2 , x , + A,?xz + B 2 u (11)
reduced order, does not depend on control, and does
depend on the discontinuity surface equation. The design where A , , (i, j = 1,2), B, are constant matrices of rele-
procedure consists of two stages. At stage 1, the function vant dimensions, x, E R"-"', x 2 E R'", det B , # 0. As-
s,, is handled as a control in (6) and designed in accor- suming that control vector components have discontinu-
dance with some performance criterion-a standard con- ities on linear surfaces,
trol task. In stage 2 selection of discontinuous control s = cx,+I,, s E R"' ( 12)
follows to switching logic in (1) to enforce the sliding
we find that, when the sliding mode appears on manifold
mode, which is equivalent to stability task in s space ( 7 ) of
s = 0 (i.e., x2 = -Cx,),the system behavior is governed
a reduced order as well. It should be noted that the last
by the ( n - m)th-order equation
problem is not very difficult since its dimension and that
of control coincide. As a result, the control design is i , = ( A , ,- A & > x , . (13)
decoupled into two independent tasks of lower dimen- One of the possible ways of obtaining the required
sions: ( n - m)th order at the first stage and mth order at dynamic properties of the control systems is assigning
the second. In a thus-designed system starting from some eigenvalues of a closed-loop system with linear feedback.
finite time instant, the motion with the prescribed proper- However, whereas in the context of initial system (10) we
ties will arise. are concerned with a task of full dimensionality, introduc-
Time interval preceding the sliding mode decreases ing a sliding mode reduces it, since the order of the sliding
with the growth of control magnitude ill], and if it is equation (13) is decreased by an amount equal to the
small enough it is the very sliding equations that predeter- control dimension. For controllable systems (lo), there
mine control system properties. always exists a matrix C, ensuring the desired eigenvalues
What shall we expect of sliding modes in systems oper- of the system (13) [16]. The matrix C being a solution to
ating under uncertainty conditions? Suppose that in the the (n-m)th-order eigenvalue assigning task determines
system equation the equation of discontinuity surfaces (12). The second
stage of the design procedure is choice of discontinuous
i =f(x,t) + B ( x , t ) u + h(x,t) (8) control such that the sliding mode always arises at the
manifold s = 0, which is equivalent to stability of the
origin in m-dimensional space s. The motion projection
vector h(x, t ) represents all the factors whose influence
on the s space is described by an equation similar to (7):
on the control process should be eliminated. If for each x
and t S = Rx + B , u ,
fi = ( C A , , + A , I ) X , + ( C A , , + A 2 2 ) X 2 .
h E range { B ) (9) The discontinuous control
U = -alxlB,' sign s, a - const
which means that disturbances act in control space, then
there exists control U , such that Bu, = -h and hence (1x1 is the sum of vector x component moduli) leads to
the system is invariant to h(x,t). But control U,, would S = Rx - alxlsigns. (14)
hardly be implementable since the disturbances may be
There exists such positive value of a that the functions S,
inaccessible for measurement. and s, ( i = l;.., m) have different signs. It means that the
As we had established the sliding mode equation in any
sliding mode will occur in each discontinuity surface.
manifold does not depend on control. Similarly, via the Within the same framework a discontinuous control
equivalent control method, it can be shown that sliding may be designed in accordance with a mean square crite-
mode is independent on h(x,t) as well, therefore condi-
rion
tion (9) is the invariance condition for sliding mode con-
trol. It is important that for the design of an invariant I = ['kTQxdt, Q 2 0.
system there is no need to measure vector h. To ensure
sliding mode existence, only an upper estimate of h (a If we are concerned with optimization of sliding motions,
number or function) is needed. then the sliding manifold should be linear while coeffi-
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
28 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 40,NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1993
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
~
TABLE I
CONTROL
OF E L K IRIC MO I ORS
__
IgWCTIOB HOlVR
LPosition and flux a, it,^^ n, dn/dt
LR
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
30 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIALELECTRONICS, VOL. 40, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1993
Let n,(t) be a reference input, then the second-order motion components may be separated by rates and then
motion equation with respect to the error x , = n,(t) - n the fast one is neglected. A similar situation may happen
is of form when controlling a dc motor with a mechanical motion
being much slower than an electromagnetic one. Formally
it means that L a J in (15), (16), which may be presented
as
di
where a,, a 2 , and b are positive parameters, f(t)-a time
function depending on M,(t), n & t ) and their time deriva-
L - = -ir - k,(n,, - A n ) u
dt
(15‘) +
tives. d An
For discontinuous control J-- = -k,i + M , + Jiz,
dt
u = U() sign s, s = cxl + x2 ul,,c - const (18) with a control error An = no - n. Let us write down
the error x , decays exponentially should the sliding mode formally the equation for An making L be equal to zero.
occur on the line s = 0 since its equation Then, substitution of the solution of (15’) with L = 0
cxl + il= 0 I = --
ke
(n, - An) + -Ur
1
r
is linear and does not depend on f ( t ) ,
As follows from into (16‘) yields
S = cx2 - a l x l - a 2 x , +f ( t ) - bu, sign s
in the system (17), (18) with
Equation (23) is taken as a reduced-order model of a dc
> 1~x2- ~ 1 x 1- ~ 2 x 2+ f ( t > I (19) motor. Within the framework of the model (23), discontin-
the values of s and S have opposite signs and the state uous control U = uOsign A n , depending only on the con-
reaches the sliding line s = 0 after a finite time interval. trol error (in contrast to (18), depending on its time
Inequality (19) determines the voltage needed for enforc- derivative) for high enough U , , provides the sliding mode
ing the sliding mode, as a result, the control error is in “manifold” An = 0; and, as a result ideal tracking the
steered to zero. reference input n,,(t) by the shaft rotation speed. How-
For implementation of control (181, angle acceleration ever, as it was discussed in Section VI, the unmodeled
is needed ( x 2 = ii, - iz). Under the assumptions that the dynamics (15‘) may excite nonadmissible chattering. Fol-
angle speed n and the current i can be measrued directly lowing the recommendation of Section VI, chattering may
and the load torque varies slowly or be eliminated by using asymptotic observers.
Bearing in mind that M , = 0, let us design an asymp-
dM,/dt = 0 (20) totic observer to estimate An (23) and M,:
a conventional Luenberger reduced-order observer may
d An k,,k, krn
be designed: J- = -(no - An) - -U
dt r r
dM/dt = 1/J( -1M + l’n + lk,i) (21) + M, + .hio+ l,(An - A n ) (24)
with 1 - const, as an estimate of M = M , + In. Ac-
dML
cording to (161, (2!), and (21) the equation for the mis- ~ = /,(An - An)
match M = M - M is of the form dt
1- where A n and kLare estimates for An and M,, li and 1,
dM/dt= --M. are constant. Control is a discontinuous function of the
J error estimate
By a proper choic? of gain 1, the desired convergence rate
u = u0 sign A n . (26)
of to zero or M - In to M , may be provided. It means
that the load torque is known and the time derivative The values of A, and its time derivative (24) have differ-
d n / d t may be found from (16). ent signs if
Similarly, the sliding mode control may be designed for
position and torque control with or without measurement U, > k,(n, - An)
r ,. Jr
+ -MI> + -iz, + - ( A n
1,r A
- An) .
of the motor current. In addition to control of mechanical krn k km
coordinates, optimization in accordance with a power
consumption criterion may be provided for dc motors with
a controlled excitation current [6]. Origination of the sliding mode means that the discyntin-
Section VI was dedicated to sliding mode control in the uous control (26), (27) reduces the error estimate An to
systems with unmodeled dynamics in which the partial zero. To derive a sliding mode equation in accordance
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
UTKIN: SLIDING MODE CONTROL DESIGN PRINCIPLES 31
JAri= -
kekm
-An
r
a - 1, An
-
and c,, c2 are const positive values.
The static inverter forms three independent controls
u R , u s , u T , so one degree of freedom can be used to
ML = -1, An
satisfy some additional criterion. Let the voltages
Apparently the eigenvalues of the homogeneous system uR,u s , uT constitute a three-phase balanced system, which
may be assigned at our will by a proper choice of 1, and 1, means that the equality
and the desired rate of the control error An decay may be
guaranteed.
The principal advantage of the reduced-order-based
method is that the angle acceleration is not needed for should hold for any t .
designing sliding mode control. If all three functions s,, s2,s3 are equal to zero then, in
addition to balanced system condition (32), the speed and
IX. INDUCTION
MOTORS
flux mismatches decay exponentially since s, = 0, s, = 0
The most simple, reliable and economic of all with c1,c2> 0 are first-order differential equations. This
motors-maintenance-free induction motors-supersede means that the design task is reduced to enforcing the
dc motors in today's technology, although, in terms of sliding mode in the manifold s = 0, sT = (sl, s,, s3) in the
controllability, induction motors seem the most compli- system (31) with control uT = ( u R ,u s , U , ) . Projection of
cated. Their behavior is described by a nonlinear high- the system motion on subspace s can be written as
order system of differential equations:
ds
dn 1 ' H . -==++U (33)
_ -- - ( M - M L ) ,M = - ip4,) dt
dt J XR
where vector F = (f l , f 2 , 0) and matrix D do not depend
'4a
- - - -4,
'R
- n4b + rR-z,
x H . on control and are continuous functions of the motor
dt xR XR state and inputs. Matrix D is of form
D= I':[ D, =
di, -
_
dt
dip
-
x,xR
'R
- X;
i--
'H
x R dt
'4,
- r,i, + U,
and
_ - - rsi, + up
d = (1,1, l ) , k - const,det D f 0.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
32 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 40, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1993
dt
= -4,
xR
- n4,
Find its time derivative on the state trajectories of system
(33): d p -
- - - -
'R
-4, + n$,. (37)
du/dt = s T (F + Du). (34) dt XR
provide negativeness of du/dt and hence the origin in the Under the assumption that the load torque M L varies
space s* (and by virtue of det D f 0 in the space s as slowly the value of dn/dt may be found using the ob-
well) is asymptotically stable. Hence sliding mode arises in server (21) designed for a dc motor.
the manifold s = 0, which enables one to steer the vari- The maintenance of an electric drive would be simpli-
ables under control to the desired values. Note that the fied considerably if it can be designed with no transducers
existence condition (35) are inequalities, therefore the of mechanical coordinates. A rotor flux and angle speed
only range of parameter variations and a load torque may be found simultaneously with the help of a nonlinear
should be known for the choice of necessary values of observer with discontinuous parameters and stator cur-
phase voltages. rents and voltages as its inputs [30]:
The equation of discontinuity surfaces s* = 0 depend
on an angle acceleration, rotor flux, and its time deriva-
tive. These values may be found using asymptotic ob-
servers under the assumption that an angle speed n and
stator currents iR,is, i , are measured directly. Bearing in
mind that
di,
-_
dt
- xR
x,xR - x i i--
xH
xR dt
d6a - r,i, +U,
dt
-
rR
-4,
XR
A
- n4, + rR-ia
xH.
XR
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
UTKIN: SLIDING MODE CONTROL DESIGN PRINCIPLES 33
is steered to zero due to enforcing sliding modes. The first a,(t) = a ( t ) - -(12
- sgn a ) (T = n o ( t ) - n (42)
design method is oriented to induction motors with a high
inertia moment reduced to the rotor shaft. where a ( t ) is continuous function depending on the con-
Neglecting the electromagnetic dynamics means that trol algorithm (in particular a ( t >= ~ , t o1 , = const cor-
the rotation speeds of the flux and voltage coincide and responds to voltage rotation at constant speed). Similarly,
w1 = n + s, where s is a motor slip. The above procedure to (41) the discontinuous control (42) makes the signs of U
results in and 6 opposite, and due to origination of sliding mode
the rotor speed tracks the reference input.
Jri = M ( s ) - ML (39) For the above control algorithms it is assumed that the
motor slip or the phase of the voltage are discontinuous
where M ( s ) is the well-known induction motor “torque-
functions of the control error. However, the only motor
slip” characteristics (Fig. 16). slip control with constant voltage amplitude may result in
The maximum value of the motor torque M,, corre-
too high magnitude of the current (the flux) at low rotor
sponds to the critical value of slip and for Is1 < s,,
speed, also the only phase control is unable to provide the
wide range of rotor speed control. Then the system com-
bining both control methods will be needed since chang-
ing the voltage phase by n- means that inversion of its sign
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
34 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 40, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1993
and switching at high frequency is equivalent to reducing magnets governed by differential equations:
average value of voltage amplitude.
Let the value of the input voltage rotation speed be did
xd- dt = - ~ df xd iq n f ud
formed in correspondence with the slip control algorithm.
w1 = n + s,, sgn a
Taking into account the phase control algorithm (42) and
relationships
IT
CY, = ( w , dt - -(1 - sgn a )
2 dY -
_ -n (44)
obtain dt
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
UTKIN: SLIDING MODE CONTROL DESIGN PRINCIPLES 35
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
36 IEEE TUNSACTICINS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 40, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1993
tinuity planes in multidimensional structure variable systems,” [30] D. B. Izosimov, “Sliding-mode nonlinear state observer of an
Aut. Remote Contr., vol. 39, no. 10, pt. 1, 1978, pp. 1466-1470. induction motor,” in Control of Multiconnected Systems, M. V.
B. Drazenovic, “The invariance conditions in variable structure Meerov and N. A. Kuznetsov, Eds. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 133-139,
systems,” Automafica, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 287-295, 1969. 1983, (in Russian).
P. V. Kokotovic, R. B. O’Malley, Jr., and P. Sannuti, “Singular [31] Y. Dote, T. Manabe, and Murakami, “Microprocessor-based force
perturbation and order reduction in control theory,” Automafica, control for manipulator using variable structure with sliding mode,”
vol. 12, pp. 123-132, 1976. in Proc. IFAC Conf: on Control in Power Electronics and Electrical
A. G. Bondarev, S. A. Bondarev, et al. ., “Sliding modes in systems DriL,es, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1983, pp. 145- 149.
with asymptotic state observers,” Aut. Remofe Contr., vol. 46, no. 6, [32] F. Harashima, H. Hashimoto, and K. Maruyama, “Practical robust
pt. 1, pp. 679-684, 1985. control of robot arm using variable structure control,” in Proc.
[201 J. J. Slotine and S. S. Sastri, “Tracking control of nonlinear 1986 IEEE Int. Conf: on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 7-10, San
systems using sliding surfaces, with applications to robot manipula- Francisco, pp. 532-539, 1986.
tor,” Inf. J. Contr., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 465-492, 1983.
[33] H. Hashimoto et al., “Sliding mode control of induction motors
1211 J. J. Slotine, “Sliding controller design for nonlinear systems,” Int. based on reduced order models,” in Korean Automatic Control
J. Contr., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 421-434, 1984. Con$, vol. 2, pp. 1607-1610, 1991.
[221 J. A. Burton and A. S. I. Zinober, “Continuous approximation of
variable structure control,” Inc. J. System Sci., vol. 17, no. 6, pp.
875-885, 1986.
[231 D. B. Izosimov, B. Matic, et al., “Using sliding modes in control of
electrical drives,” Dokl. A N S S S R , vol. 241, no. 4, pp. 769-772,
1978. (In Russian). Vadim 1. Utkin was born in Moscow, USSR in
Y. Dote and R. C. Hoft, “Microprocessor based sliding mode 1937. He received the Dipl. Ing. degree from the
controller for dc motor control drives,” in IEEE U S Con$ Rec., Moscow Power Institute in 1960 and the Candi-
Cincinnati, OH, 1980. date (Ph.D.) and Doctor degrees from the Insti-
A. Sabanovic and D. Izosimov, “Application of sliding modes to tute of Control Sciences in 1964 and 1971, re-
induction motor control,” IEEE Trans. Industiy Applications, vol. spectively.
LA-17, no. 1, pp. 41-49, 1981. Since 1960 he has been with the Institute of
A. Sabanovic, D. Izosimov, 0. Music, and F. Bilalovic, “Sliding Control Sciences, since 1973 he has been Head
modes in controlled motor drives,” in Proc. IFAC Conf. on Control of the Diwmtinuous Control Systems Labora-
in Power Electronics and Electrical Drice~,Lausanne, Switzerland, tory He is d part-time Professor at Polytechni-
1983, pp. 133-138. cal Institute He was a Visiting Professor at the
F. Harashima, H. Hashimoto, and S. Kondo, “MOSFET converter- University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, from 1975 to 1976 and the
fed position servo system with sliding mode control,” IEEE Trans. University of Tokyo in 1991.
Ind. Elecrron., vol. IE-32, no. 3, pp. 238-244, 1986. Dr. Utkin is Honorary Doctor at the University of Sarajevo, Yu-
H. Hashimoto, H. Yamomoto, S. Yanagisava, and F. Harashima, goslavia (1978). Dr. Utkin was awarded the Lenin Prize in 1972. His
“Brushless servomotor control using variable structure approach,” research interest$ are sliding mode controls, discontinuous dynamic
in ConJ Rec. 1986 IEEE Industry Application Society Annu. Meet., systems, infinite dimensional systems, and control of electric drivers,
pt. 1, 1986, pp. 72-79. vehicles, manipulators, and industrial processes He has published four
G. P. Matthew, R. DeCarlo, and Lefebvre, “Towards feasible books and more than 170 technical papers.
variable structure control design for a synchronous machine con- Dr. Utkin is an Associate Editor of the IFAC JournalAutomatica and
nected to an infinite bus,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. the Intemational Journal of Control He was a Chairman of the Interna-
AC-31, no. 12, 1986. tional Program Committee of the l l th IFAC Congress in 1990.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Sejong University. Downloaded on November 11, 2009 at 06:52 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.