Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
and Theology
Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible
DOI: 10.1177/014610799902800406
1999; 28; 165 Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology
F. Scott Spencer
ACTS. Cambridge, UK: University Press, 1996. Pp. xx + 374. Cloth, n.p
Book Reviews: Ben Witherington, III, ed., HISTORY, LITERATURE, AND SOCIETY IN THE BOOK OF
http://btb.sagepub.com
The online version of this article can be found at:
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Biblical Theology Bulletin Inc.
can be found at: Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology Additional services and information for
http://btb.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Email Alerts:
http://btb.sagepub.com/subscriptions Subscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Reprints:
http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Permissions:
by RONALD ROJAS on April 5, 2009 http://btb.sagepub.com Downloaded from
165
Book Reviews
Ben
Witherington, III, ed., HISTORY, LITER-
ATURE, AND SOCIETY IN THE BOOK OF
ACTS.
Cambridge,
UK:
University Press,
1996.
Pp.
xx
+
374. Cloth, n.p.
This collection of fourteen
essays by
leading
Lukan scholars
explores
various fac-
ets of the book of Acts in its formative
first-century setting.
While
broadly
reflect-
ing
the traditional historical interests of F. F.
Bruce and C.
J
Hemer-two well
known,
con-
servative British
interpreters
of
Acts, to
whose
memory
this volume is dedi-
cated-these studies also
exemplify
certain
newer, interdisciplinary approaches
elucidat-
ing
the ancient
literary
and social contexts of
Acts.
Part I contains five
essays dealing
with
fundamental
questions concerning genre
and
historiography
from different
compara-
tive
perspectives.
W.
J. McCoy,
a classicist,
offers a detailed introduction to the work of
the
pioneering
Greek
military historian,
Thucydides;
in a substantial addendum com-
paring Thucydides
and
Luke, particularly
in
their treatment of historical
speeches,
Ben
Witherington suggests
that
Thucydides pro-
vides a &dquo;close&dquo; model for the author of Acts
&dquo;who means to write
accurately
on a serious
subject
without
neglecting
certain concerns
for
style
and rhetorical convention&dquo;
(p. 26).
C. K. Barrett
presents
a critical
comparison
of the distinctive accounts of the
Jerusalem
conference in Acts 15 and Galatians 2
through
the
eyes
of two eminent nine-
teenth-century
historians of
early
Christian-
ity,
F. C. Baur and
J.
B.
Lightfoot. Although
often
pitted against
one
another,
each
scholar,
in Barretts estimation, still com-
mends himself to modern students of Acts
continuing
to wrestle with
(apparent)
dis-
crepancies
between Lukes narrative and
Pauls letters: where Baur
admirably pro-
motes unfettered critical
inquiry (philoso-
phy), Lightfoot
models
judicious sifting
of
available
linguistic
evidence
(philology).
Charles Talbert
recapitulates
his case
that Luke-Acts
represents
a
type
of Greco-
Roman
biographical
literature in the mold
of
Diogenes
Laertius LIVES.
focusing
on the
careers of a
founding philosopher-teacher
(Jesus
in Luke) and his
successor-disciples
who
perpetuate
his work and emulate his life
(apostels
in Acts). Analyzing
the
preface
to
Acts, Loveday
Alexander finds that it, like its
counterpart
in Luke 1:1-4, best
occupies
a lit-
erary
niche &dquo;where
historiography
intersects
with the
broader, non-rhetorical tradition of
philosophical
and technical
prose&dquo; (or &dquo;scien-
tific literature,&dquo; p. 101). Jacob Jervell
stresses
more the
uniqueness
of Lukes work in
Greco-Roman
antiquity, viewing
it as a de-
liberate extension of &dquo;salvation
history,&dquo;
a
scriptural commentary demonstrating
the
fulfillment of Gods
holy purpose (boure) for
Israel in the mission of
Jesus
and his follow-
ers.
Part II features five studies
tackling spe-
cific &dquo;historical and
theological
difficulties in
Acts.&dquo;
Craig
Hill
challenges
the dominant
paradigm (since F. C. Baur) dividing early
Jewish Christianity,
as
presented
in Acts
6-8,
into two clear-cut factions of &dquo;conserva-
tive,&dquo; &dquo;legalistic&dquo; Hebraists, on the one hand,
and more &dquo;liberal,&dquo; &dquo;universalist&dquo; Hellznists,
on the other. As Hill sees
it, the fluid and
complex
nature of
Jewish Christianity
defies
facile
parsing
into
tidy
cultural and
&dquo;ideologi-
cal
pigeonholes.&dquo;
Richard Bauckham contrib-
utes two
analyses
of
speech
material: the first,
exposing
the
sophisticated,
&dquo;skilled
exegesis&dquo;
of the
Jewish scriptures
in
James
address in
Acts
15:13-21-drawing
on both Hebrew
and Greek versions (further complicating
the
supposed
Hebrew-Hellenist dichot-
omy)-and
the
second, isolating
a
typical pat-
tern of
early
Christian
preaching (kerygma)
summarized in Acts
2:22-24, 32-33; 3:13;
10:36-42; 13:23-31, reflecting
a basic
yet
flexible form of oral tradition
underlying
the
kerygmatic
outlines in Pauls
writings (1 Cor
15:3-7) and certain
early second-century
works (Ascension of
Isaiah; letters of
Ignatius).
David Moessner discovers in the
speeches
of Acts an
overarching emphasis
on
the
crucifixion, exaltation, and
proclama-
tion
of Jesus
Messiah as the three
&dquo;necessary&dquo;
(dei) planks
of Gods ultimate
plan (boule)
for
redeeming
Israel and the
nations, a
plan
already pre-&dquo;scripted&dquo;
in the
scriptural
ac-
counts
surrounding Moses, David, and the
suffering
Servant of God in Isaiah (cf. Jervell,
above). Within this
plan,
Moessner
argues,
against
standard critical
opinion,
that the
death of
Jesus
carries
&dquo;atoning&dquo; significance
as the means for
effecting
&dquo;release of sins.&dquo; In
the most distinctive
methodological
contri-
bution in this
sections, Jerome Neyrey
effec-
tively
utilizes the
comprehensive
model of so-
cial stratification in
agrarian
societies devel-
oped by
Gerhard Lenski, along
with
anthropological grids
of honor-shame cul-
tures, to describe the social status of Paul
portrayed
in Acts. The
emerging picture
re-
veals a
thoroughly
&dquo;urban and urbane Paul,&dquo;
a
&dquo;forensically adept&dquo;
member of the &dquo;re-
tainer class&dquo; able to hold his own before
Jew-
ish and Roman elites.
Part III
presents
four studies of
peculiar
literary phenomena
in Acts.
Focusing
on the
numerous intertextual echoes between Acts
and both the
Gospel
of Luke and the Greek
First Testament (LXX), Joel
Green detects a
markedly
&dquo;overcoded&dquo; narrative (in the
terms of
literary
critic Umberto Eco) in
which readers are
expected
to
interpret
the
story
of the
early
church (Acts) as
fully
&dquo;in-
scribed&dquo; within the web of
preceding
stories
surrounding
the
person
of
Jesus (Luke) and
the
people
of Israel (LXX). Bill Arnold fur-
ther takes
up
the matter of Lukes
employ-
ment of the First
Testament, suggesting
the
the narrators
placement
of First Testament
citations and
phrases
on the
lips
of
key
speechmakers
in
Acts-Stephen, Peter,
and
Paul-serves to
identify
these characters and
their
viewpoints
with the
figures
of
Moses,