The meeting was called to order at 10:32 a.m. by Member Stoldt.
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
REPORTS FROM TAC MEMBERS
Member Stoldt invited reports from the TAC. Executive Director Cullem spoke to the City of Marinas workshop indicating it was informative. He spoke to their understanding that this is a regional water supply problem through the county. He then spoke to the handout from the CPUC concerning the surcharge proposals made by Cal Am.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Member Stoldt invited public comment for items not on the agenda and had no requests to speak.
AGENDA ITEMS
1. Receive Report on RFP Process for the Value Engineering (VE) Study of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (MPWSP) and Approve Selection of Rick Riedl as TAC Representative on the VE Review Committee - Cullem.
Executive Director Cullem introduced the item and spoke to the purpose of the request for proposals, the process, timeline and the benefits of the Value Engineering (VE) at the 30% design review point. He requested that the TAC approve appointment of Member Riedl to the review and selection committee which would be made up of four public agency representatives as voting members, as well as a Cal Am representative participating as a non voting member. Member Stoldt invited public comment on the item. David Lifland questioned the purpose of the 30% designation for the VE evaluation. MPRWA Minutes Monday, May 5, 2014
MPRWA TAC Meeting Minutes Regular Meeting Minutes - Monday, May 5, 2014 2 Mr. Crooks indicated that it is the most efficient and cost-effective point to be able to incorporate changes into the design process.
On motion by TAC Member Riley, seconded by Committee Member Israel, and carried by the following vote, the MPRWA Technical Advisory Committee approved the selection of Rick Riedl as TAC Representative on the Value Engineering Review Committee:
2. Receive Report on the Test Slant Well Permits and Construction - Cal Am
Ian Crooks from Cal Am indicated that he is expecting the City of Marina permits for the slant wells to be issued by the end of this week. The project is still on track to begin construction on the test slant wells in November 2014 after receiving Coastal Commission approval in October. He also indicated that the preliminary results from the bore holes were favorable. Member Stoldt invited public comment. David Lifland questioned why construction would not start in October immediately after CC approval. This item was an update for information only. Chair Burnett arrived.
3. Receive Report on Negotiations for GWR Source and Product Water - Isreal
Member Israel presented regarding the status of the Pure Water Monterey project. He spoke to the purpose and make up of the Independent Advisory Panel which provided comments, made suggestions and recommendations including both technical and mechanical changes. He spoke to ongoing activities for the project including continuing Salinas produce wash water tests, reviewing and editing sections of the administrative draft EIR, coordination of meetings with the CPUC EIR team and meetings with parties to solidify source water agreement negotiations and concessions. Mr. Isreal then spoke to the updated project phasing chart provided noting the largest change was regarding the source water agreements. He indicated the key for resolving the current disconnect is mitigating the growers concerns and is hopeful that the source water agreements could be completed by the next meeting. He closed by saying they are trying to get everyone all the water they need, and it will work, if everyone wants to work together. The Members questioned some of the details of the current source water agreements. Mr. Israel spoke to the timeframe of the agreements and the aspects being negotiated. MPRWA Minutes Monday, May 5, 2014
Chair Burnett invited public comment on the item. David Lifland questioned the required processing time for the product water produced by GWR and added to ASR expressing concerns regarding water quality issues. Member Stoldt clarified that travel time is built into the process and the regulation is a 6 month processing storage requirement. This item was for information only.
4. Receive Report on Cost Comparison Study of GWR vs DESAL - Stoldt
Member Stoldt reported that the cost comparison study hinges on the water negotiations and until there is a clear runway with the MRWPCA, the cost comparison cannot be completed. Executive Director Cullem indicated that the TAC has been tasked to track the costs, and the problem is that between the two projects, there is an unequal comparison, since they are so different. Mr. Stoldt indicated that until the feasibility work for plant, injection wells, and source water conveyances are solidified, this cannot be completed. Member Israel agreed. Member Stoldt reported that the MPWMD has received three proposals regarding the solicitation for the externality study. All of the fee quotes were two to three times higher than the amount budgeted and don't all include expert testimony.
Chair Burnett invited public comment and had no requests to speak.
ADJOURNMENT
Member Riley requested a future agenda item to discuss the future longevity expectation for existence of the Water Authority. Chair Burnett indicated that there is no official statement at this time but the general understanding is that the Authority will be phased out after water is flowing. Chair Burnett invited comments from the public. David Lifland expressed concern with accounting from all the water that is projected to be inserted into the Seaside basin, if the quantity is accurate for the needs for peninsula and if there is adequate storage available.
ATTEST:
Lesley Milton, Authority Clerk Jason Burnett, TAC Chair